Pretty funny that this video talks about a new way to learn and teach, but the person who made this video has trouble creating proper sentence structure or spelling the word "lose". Doesn't do much for your case...yikes.
@chrismca. Exactly, the human brain needs a theory or as u put it "Each of these theories has abundant data to support it: DATA is the language a group of people understand and communicate with. But education has gone beyond what can b perceived through the physical senses, therefore making DATA(agreeable facts of proof) irrelevant!
It just gives emerging and ever changing industry more ways to use talents as opposed to what it needed when education evolved during 19th century industrialism. Back then it needed math sciences and later languages. Today the way business is done have changed, so evolution is taking place. he makes the most sense as of now. Do u have a better argument?
@SplineTol Sure, there are at least four better arguments. 1. Spearman's theory better explains the facts gathered when measuring intelligence. 2. Cattell's theory of chrystalized and fluid intelligence better explains an array of mental performances. 3. Sterberg's triarchic model better explains intelligence when used in practical situations, and 4, Simon & Newel's theory better defines intelligence.
Each of these theories has abundant data to support it, whereas Mult Intell has none.
if M.I. theory is so obvious "people are smart in different areas" then why has it taken the industrialism model of education supporters more than a century to figure this out. Math and English are hardly the only two areas/subjects that students show high levels of intelligence in.
Thumbs up if you came from UP.
Darknight24x 5 months ago
Interpersonal is placed twice, you forgot naturalist in the listings. But this video is excellent! I plan on showing it in my college class
Immortal0Gypsy 5 months ago
esse video é um lixo
marinha0123 6 months ago
POST LYRICS PLEASEEE!
bieberfeverlovers 1 year ago
Pretty funny that this video talks about a new way to learn and teach, but the person who made this video has trouble creating proper sentence structure or spelling the word "lose". Doesn't do much for your case...yikes.
mikeofstedal 1 year ago
this is so right! unfortunately Florida is still teaching the old way. FCAT they still think one size fits all!
lasrivi 1 year ago
Excellent! This is a fun way to learn about a fun way to learn!
20wgm11 1 year ago
Perceived needs of a society supersede any other theories!
SplineTol 2 years ago
great video and very informative by the way which song is this??
mau181 2 years ago
@chrismca. Exactly, the human brain needs a theory or as u put it "Each of these theories has abundant data to support it: DATA is the language a group of people understand and communicate with. But education has gone beyond what can b perceived through the physical senses, therefore making DATA(agreeable facts of proof) irrelevant!
SplineTol 2 years ago
It just gives emerging and ever changing industry more ways to use talents as opposed to what it needed when education evolved during 19th century industrialism. Back then it needed math sciences and later languages. Today the way business is done have changed, so evolution is taking place. he makes the most sense as of now. Do u have a better argument?
SplineTol 2 years ago
@SplineTol Sure, there are at least four better arguments. 1. Spearman's theory better explains the facts gathered when measuring intelligence. 2. Cattell's theory of chrystalized and fluid intelligence better explains an array of mental performances. 3. Sterberg's triarchic model better explains intelligence when used in practical situations, and 4, Simon & Newel's theory better defines intelligence.
Each of these theories has abundant data to support it, whereas Mult Intell has none.
chrismca 2 years ago
If you simplify it. what it says is 'some people are good at somethings and some at other things'. But obviously!!!
Because of all the silly need to provide facts to prove a theory "logical", academics cannot believe where it is not proved.
SplineTol 2 years ago
@SplineTol
if M.I. theory is so obvious "people are smart in different areas" then why has it taken the industrialism model of education supporters more than a century to figure this out. Math and English are hardly the only two areas/subjects that students show high levels of intelligence in.
industrialists < academics
:)
coloradoangler2 1 year ago