Added: 4 years ago
From: parentstv
Views: 4,163
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (59)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • PTC = Pissing Toadfuck Cunts.

    seriously, go fuck yourselves PTC. stop telling people what's appropiate. you think kids are stupid enough to watch a TV-14 show? or better yet, you think parents are retarded enough to say: "hey billy, this show called South Park is so funny, watch it!" you're just trying to excuse yourselves from being horrible parents.

  • Garbage video is garbage

  • [Comment removed by the PTC]

  • Lolz... Parents Media Council

    Spamming those who are smarter than them

  • You guys really suck. You spamed the comments on your channel that say that you suck or talk about how bad you are.

  • i flaged this video and clicked INFRINGES MY RIGHTS!

  • it's also "unamerican" that PTC feels that they can try to get everything censored.

    Conservative pricks. Just turn your tv's off and quit letting your kids watch adult programs. If you don't like it, change the channel

  • Thanks PTC, for ruining TV for everyone :D!

  • hey, if the majority of us posting comments hate the PTC, why are we getting so many thumbs down?

  • how about you stop bitching. it's not like sex and nudity is a bad thing. yeah, i jack off 8 hours a day and all i get is pleasure. i'm a perverted atheist and proud of it!!!!

  • wow this video really shows how cheap these PTC idiots can be. any way why the hell do they care what other parents children waches... damn it just cuz they cant handle there own kids does not mean that they should punish other peoples children. its the PTC's fault shows like Boy Meets Worldand Invader Zim got canseld. They would rather hav there kids wach telle tubbies and hannah montana that teahes them jnothng. when they can be waching a show like boy meets world and learning crap the need

  • @mindfreakloyal92 well technically IZ got cancelled cuz of low rating but i TOTALLY agree. PTC needs to go fuck itself

  • PTC= Mainstream Media Nazis

  • They ironically are angry over the Janet Jackson thing which was YEARS ago and was an A-C-C-I-D-E-N-T. Can't they accept the fact it wasn't intentional?

  • @BuddyComics What was the Janet Jackson thing?

  • The PTC Sucks!!!! They want to make everything "young Children Friendly" SCREW YOU PTC!!!!

  • who would want to go to mexico? that one ghetto field trip

  • "oh, yeah. Thats like getting hate mail from Hitler. Theyre literally terrible human beings. Ive read their newsletter, Ive visited their website, and theyre just rotten to the core. For an organization that prides itself on Christian values—I mean, Im an atheist, so what do I know?—they spend their entire day hating people. They can all suck my dick as far as Im concerned." Seth MacFarlane

    seth you da man

  • Some of these impudent fools comments are so pitiful and make so little sense it makes us look all better. Fight on!

  • F-U-C-K the PTC! They are a bunch of dumb ass conservatives who rely on TV to teach their kids morals, they criticize south park, even though they make fun of racism, and teach morals, "I will never know how it feels to be a black person when that word comes out" Fuck them, and fuck the douche bags who donate to them, and fuck the douche bags who cave into their FCC complaints!

  • Hell yeah! Those bastards don't even know that there are also teenagers watching television. That's right- TEENAGERS!

  • i hate ptc they complained abouth south park saying the n word 42 times. but the episodes was actually against racisim and all the time shte n word was said it was only people in the episode saying stuff like "i cant believe they said the n word"

  • r u serious????

  • Update on the case (especially for those that thought it'd never get this far): Go to broadcastingcable . com and search for PTC. Click on the first article entitled: PTC Praises Court for Hearing Cable Class-Action Suit Date: Jun 27, 2008 | Author: By John Eggerton.

  • Why the hell should I have to pay ANYTHING for channels that show commercials??? That's the main reason why I don't have cable, also most channels keep their logos on the screen so it's impossible to actually watch anything.

    Internet service works differently; I probably wouldn't pay for that either if my provider was being paid for each junk e-mail I get.

  • I just find it funny that the only reason the Parents Television Council gives to shakes about this issue is that they just want to buy channels that live up to their expectations of decency instead of just making sure they kids don't watch stuff they don't want them to watch......

  • Uh, that's not true at all. We care because no one should have to pay for something they don't want in order to get what they do want. Why pay for the Disney Channel to get FX? It works for everyone and will lower the cost of cable/satellite services despite the lies they tell otherwise.

  • zogby. com/ news/ ReadNews. dbm?ID=1377 (close the gaps) People prefer to not pay for what they don't watch.

  • Im going to call up my newspaper and tell them I dont want the sports section or the front page as all I read are the business and comic sections.Personally I doubt that those niche channels will be able to survive. MTV and Comedy Central will survive but how many people will want the History channel when they must pay more? It would be more expensive and probably cause my bill to be higher than it is now. If you want a popular channel it may be cheaper but those less watched ones wont make it.

  • But the idea is to give people a choice. If they want to pay for less channels and pay more, that's up to them. But if they don't they can stay with the bundles. It's not one or the other. :D

  • I'm worried that those niche channels will die. I see one of two things happening. 1) Channels consolidate. You see kid time around noon and then turns over to "adult" stuff. That way they can make the most money all the time. Bring the best of all channels into one. or 2) They kill off the niche channels and only keep those that make money. Which means my Sci-Fi channel might not make it at all. I'd rather pay for programing I "dont want" than not pay for programming I do.

  • That's a point but you're safe with Sci-Fi. That channel is VERY popular. And keep in mind that this isn't just for people who don't want what they consider offensive, it's also for people that don't want pay for the kiddie channels when they want the adult content.

  • That is what is scary. If people buy less programs prices rise and we get less channels for our money. Bundles will go up as well because less people will have bundles. The industry isn't the one that is going to get hurt. We are. They will raise their prices and we will pay the same with less overall choice. That isn't what I want. PS Sci-fi isn't "very popular." It has only a couple rating makers at most. But you think there is enough content on there to pay more per month? No way.

  • Also, it's not all or nothing. Cable choice is just that. It's another choice that consumers would have. If they, like you, would rather keep the bundled package, then they can but if they'd like to just pay for a couple of channels, then they can do that, too.

  • I dont use Long st. I dont use Market. But I still have to pay taxes to keep them up. Why is that? People should only pay taxes on streets they use. Why is it fair I have to pay for a bad road to be fixed up if Ill never use it? Because when lots of people pay a little it is better than a few people paying alot. Same for cable. There are many more people than cable channels and so that lowers the overall price. If 30 people paid for 5 channels it would be more expensive than 3000 paying for 100.

  • Yo, ThePolishYak, what does this video have to do with the word "shoot"? It makes sense, I DO pay for channels I don't watch. Sucks. I'll vote just to see if something happens!

  • Yeah that had nothing to do with this video and all to do with the idiotcy of the Parents Television Council. Granted it has nothing to do with this. Accutally now that I think of it this has nothing to do with why I hate the Parents Television Council therefore I'm sorry for wasting space. :(

  • First of all if he sells all those magazines he will get to Mexico quicker. Its the same with the television companies. If you don't like it use your V chip which apparently dosen't work. Get off your butt and quit blaming the television companies for your bad parenting. And whats so wrong with the word shoot? You say cars isn't for people above the age of six because profanity such as "shoot" is used? Are you kidding me?

  • How does turning off my TV stop me from paying for channels I don't want? How about if they charged you for 5 movies at the theater when you only wanted to watch one? Stupid idea, right? That's what they cable/satellite cos. are doing. I am totally for Cable Choice. & check the laws, it's illegal for them to charge you for channels you don't want just so you can get what you do want.

  • That is like saying newspapers are illegal because they bundle the sports section with the business section. Give me a break. Are ISPs illegal? Because I only want to access Youtube but I have to pay to be able to access all those other sites. I don't want to pay for that. Just youtube. Think about it as you are paying for access to streaming 24/7 video. What you see is what they have available. Kind of like a Netflix. Except they send you all the movies instead of just the ones you want.

  • No, they're not the same. A newspaper is clearly selling news ... all the news. And ISP give you the Internet from which you can pick where you go. Cable is selling individual stations that often differ in content completely and since they already break them up somewhat, why can't they break them up more? Money for them is why, not for us.

  • Like ISPs you can pick where you go. And newspapers are only slightly more focused than cable. How is the comic section newsworthy? It isn't. They add as much non-news as they do news. Why should I pay for the comic section? You really think a niche channel will survive? If you don't like how cable is stop buying it. No one makes you. No reason to over regulate something when there is no market failure.

  • Because it's illegal to do what they're doing. If you don't want cable choice, fine. I do and millions of others do, too. It's not the same as paying for a newspaper, which you can get online for free. I want to pay only for the channels I want in my house. I don't want to support stations I don't want or like.

  • It isn't illegal. They can sell you a product however they want. You don't have to buy it. Don't like it? Don't buy it. Simple as that. Make a stand with your wallet. You don't NEED cable television. Buy something else.

  • It is illegal. There is already a class action suit against the cable and satellite companies. No law firm would take this on if there wasn't a law to support it. Don't assume it's legal because it's been happening. It _is_ illegal.

  • Class action lawsuits lose all the time. Don't assume just because there is a lawsuit it is illegal. That is a naive stance. See if a judge rules that way. I really doubt it though.

  • I never said they'd win (though, of course I hope they do). I said that a law firm won't take on a case (any case) that doesn't have a law to back it up. You said it wasn't illegal, I gave you the class action suit as proof that it is illegal.  Nuff said.

  • That is like saying if the police arrest you you broke the law. They wouldn't arrest someone who didn't break the law. The DA wouldn't take on a case if that person didn't break the law. Well, guess what. They go to court for that. Of course there are laws that they can use to get into court. Anti-monopoly ones come to mind (just like Microsoft got hit with). But I don't see cable being found guilty under that as there is more than enough competition.

  • You're switching your point. This was your comment ::Don't assume just because there is a lawsuit it is illegal. :: The class action law suit disproves your comment. I've already said I didn't say they'd win. You're going in circles. Case closed.

  • No, you missed the point. Im saying they aren't breaking any laws. Just because they go to court doesn't mean they broke anything. There are so many laws that they can use to get someone into court but that doesn't mean a law was actually broken. I can sue the guy down the street for pretty much anything doesn't mean he actually did something illegal. Read a comment fully before jumping to conclusions. If the class action loses that proves cable isn't breaking any laws.

  • No, you're missing the point. No reputable law firm will take your case of suing the guy down the street if no law's been broken. Why waste their time? & a judge deciding against the plaintiffs also doesn't mean a law was not broken. How many guilty people go free every day after their day in court? I'll find the law to cite it for you.

  • Yes they will. They make money off it. And this is civil, not criminal. So that means if a judge finds them legal they are indeed legal. That is how it works. It becomes precedent. Then the law needs to be changed.

  • No they won't. No money unless they win.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more