Fused pair of handguns found in parked car and photoed in Fresh Kills as retained evidence. Of what, one is tempted to ask. But please Dr Judy, drop nicknames for phenomena eg toast, snowball, dustification. Like K Barrett DRGriffin and SJones, you can sound flippant - which is the temptation when illogic is boldy shoved at you and you're asked to swallow. I get it. But tone must be maintained & serious
Right guys everyone here that sees this video demands the American Government reopens the investigation with an independent team of scientist's, engineer's, explosive experts etc. give a thumbs up to this comment. We have had enough of the lies and demand JUSTICE!!!
All of you denigrators, name callers, ridiculers, armchair quarterbacks who haven't gone the distance, slugging back your beers in front of the TV while she works tirelessly......Dr. Wood has more brains in her little toe than all of your heads put together...silly twits imagining that your comments will be taken seriously. Maybe you're just not using enough terms like Dingbat, Moron, Pseudoscience, and tinfoil hats,,,come on,,,say more of them, maybe it will work...or Not.
Instant rust..., cars with "vanished" engine blocks..., selective "toasting" on this-or-that vehicle...
Have a look at this, where many of the "toasted cars" wound up:
watchv=w1aXxIVitZU&feature=channel_video_title
All the fantastic high-tech resources used to pull-off this treasonous crime -- and Dr. Judy, with an off-kilter projection screen and rickety mic, puts the LIE to this abominable deception. :D
The Monsters' Pets caught their sweater caught on a nail and now IT'S UNRAVELLING.
If this dingbat had any scientific explanation for what she thinks explains all the discrepancies she thinks she sees in her photos, she wouldn't have to make up her own retardified language. She should also look into the definition of "concise". This fools science fiction fans, but not those who've actually studied science. 59:33 Is the most relevant question asked from the audience, and nope, she doesn't explain anything almost an hour into part 2.
@belowthepovertyline She's asking a lot of questions. One thing we DO know is the "official theory" is load of BS for starters. To find the culprits you need to follow the money trail
@belowthepovertyline Yes, dingbat,,,terms like these, and "tinfoil hat",,,,etc. you people still think that Ridicule will dissuade people from looking a little bit closer at the LIES we are being told. The LIES aren't working anymore,,,and so they must rush to Police State, or World War, etc. to create such chaos that their Crimes will become irrelevant. But they Won't. The World is waking up. Whether or not HER takeis correct - it is clear that the Official Story is BUNK.
@TwitSpotter Yes, but JW's theory is based on faulty premises, cherrypicked photos, and pseudoscience. Therefore, it should be discredited--even the truth movement has disowned her. If you're searching for the truth and want a new investigation, wouldn't you want a unified movement? As they say, it's good to have an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out. That's exactly what's happened with JW's crowd. And many others.
@belowthepovertyline As a physicist who worked with NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion Physics program I question words like Pseudoscience. Who decides what is pseudoscience - is it really nonsense - or perhaps science which is just not yet understood or widely known? Do YOU know? I don't...and a mind so open that "your brain falls out"...well you can worry about such a mishap for yourself,,,but it's certainly nothing that will keep me from sleeping at night...I prefer wide open
@TwitSpotter OK, pick whatever term you like. Maybe non-science. Hell, call it science if you want, but that's not what it is. Calling a collapsing building an ice cream cone or burning cars cheetos or dust/smoke "fumes" is silly. If your wide open mind keeps you considering impossibilities, that's a problem--like those fools who still believe perpetual motion is possible. Not being able to rule things out is like mental hoarding, and it's anathema to science.
@belowthepovertyline And YOU are determining what is and isn't science? I don't think so...only in your own mind. No one appointed you. Some of the craziest ideas turned out to be the Right ones. Max Planck said that a certain theory wasn't likely the right one as it wasn't crazy enough. There is a difference between "Perpetual Motion" and "overunity generators" which most are referring to...Modern "science" is a Church - a set of "paradigms" with a very limited "Shelf-Life"
@TwitSpotter Yes, I am determining what is and isn't science in this case--we ALL should be able to do that, but most people are scientifically illiterate. JW looks at pictures of a building clearly falling, cars clearly burned, fires clearly burning and attributes these phenomena to the effects of a man who makes videos that can't be replicated, and who apparently doesn't document his experimental protocols.
Max Planck's quote doesn't apply across the board, I'm afraid.
@belowthepovertyline You're just arrogant, man...and pretty much unteachable. You think you a lot more than you do - you're a Poser...there are thousands like you...If you make a "strong" statement (strong in YOUR mind) you think you've won an argument. You've won nothing and will win nothing-but don't let that stop you from looking in the mirror and telling yourself how smart you are. You're not worthy of carrying Dr. Wood's books. Nothing can be determined from this video.
@TwitSpotter Should say you think you KNOW a lot more than you do-You might want to apply for a gig with the Skeptical Inquirer...I think they could use a guy like you-or maybe even "Quackwatch"-there's a guy who hasn't practiced a day of medicine in his life, didn't pass his boards, and rags on sincere doctors doing unusual and wonderful work outside the mainstream. You paint too simple a picture - a crime scene was criminally destroyed. Bless her for trying to make sense of it.
@TwitSpotter But her arguments are based on JH's work, which hasn't been proven, apparently can't be replicated, and have only been poorly explained by the man himself. Well of course I'm skeptical!! As they say in medicine (since you brought it up), when you see hoof prints, think horse before zebra. She sees overturned cars in the midst of collapsed skyscrapers and thinks "ah yes, levitation".
@TwitSpotter Yes, I have made up my mind about JW, and there isn't anything in her arguments that I (or anyone) need to remain teachable about. Her website is 1) a mess, 2) full of questions in lieu of assertions, and 3) seriously flawed observations. I haven't won anything because we're just bickering, not having an argument about JW's "evidence". I would not deign to carry this woman's books, thank you very much, her insanity might be contagious.
@belowthepovertyline Ah, now you're qualified to determine her "sanity," You're an expert on so many things. And so confident in your pronouncements. I would recommend sales work for you, but not science. Having worked with very advanced physics applications of next step propulsion, etc. which is beyond the training of mainstream physics, I am very accustomed to know-nothings casting aspersions. It used to bother me. Now I just smile, like I am smiling right now.
@TwitSpotter As an example, JW thinks the burned cars look funny. They don't; they look like many other burned cars I've seen pics of. Plastic door handles burn, upholstery burns, and sometimes the engine compartment burns without the gas tank igniting. Paper covered in dust doesn't necessarily ignite efficiently, and pictures of overturned cars in the context of two skyscraper collapses isn't compelling evidence for levitation. That's wild speculation.
@belowthepovertyline Something I found out recently. Most door handles are made of aluminium. I always thought they were plastic until I started pulling many apart and sanding them back as part of the profession. "Oh, aluminium, cool" Also, many engines are made of alloy blocks and heads, some with alloy heads and cast iron blocks...overall mix of alloy, iron, steel parts. Also the detail of ONE car turned over while a half dozen right next to it aren't does seem odd
@belowthepovertyline Dr. Wood is anything but silly...she is making analogies, etc. It is only a way to "talk" about things that are not yet entirely clear. Thinking outside the box is not a bad thing...and sometimes is necessary. There will always be naysayers and Inquisition type minds that discourage and denigrate, and often turn out to be the ones who are wrong. You have to be careful about being too opinionated, especially when you don't have enough information.
Yeah, alka seltzer and wheat chex and fumes and "toasted" cars. You need to use those words to exclude the bias of scientific terms, right? Like the subsequent confusion and ridicule you introduce won't outweigh that. Did this woman seriously attend grad school?
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
She was very clear when she said a few times that she was going over the data, not to make an conclusion, just to show facts. Remember, what happened, how it happened..so on. She is just showing what happened. She made some very interesting observations that others have overlooked. She did a great job at raising some questions that noone thought to ask. She did her job. Now the pros need to find out the answers to the questions she helped us to ask.
Dr? How did this moron earn a Phd? Great job on pointing out random shit and not providing any backing. 'This doesn't look like smoke to me' welcome to the world of atmospheric study 'DR' Judy Dumbass, that's called steam or FOG. Ever seen what smoke does on an early morning? It doesn't rise into the atmosphere, it stays low due to the high humidity. 'Doesn't look like a collapse to me' ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS? You are a blatant idiot and a disgrace. You really are.
@0TheChinaSyndrome0 ..yeah but now what...now what do we do? Nobody has an answer for that. All these 911 truthers say is we need to educate the public....yeah, it's been 10 years, the people who know and accept the truth have already done so.....and nothing is happening. SO...
SUPPORT THE SEPT 11TH, 2001 RESEARCH AND DISCOVERY PROJECT!
She keeps pointing out weird shit. What I am missing, is why? If the cars are toasted, explain it, for pete's sake. Two hours of questions, but Judy, for the love of god, postulate some answers!!
Another eloquent theory. I hope she's wrong, because an official re-examination of 9/11 will never be allowed to investigate something so top-secret. Of course, there's probably not much chance we'll get a re-examination at all. The military-industrial complex is now in complete control of our governmental infrastructures, including courts.
without having to listen to this incredibly boring woman i would say she's saying that they used a HAARP type Tesla technology to disintegrate the towers, i agree with her but she needs to learn how to present this
@nebula25x Ok, I will have a look into it then. I don't believe it was an inside job, but for sure, somebody on the inside knows who it was. And they don't want the public to know who it is. I have an faint idea...
@Marcus538 Why should the British and American's apologize....it's the elite global criminals that need to bow down...the "Islamic" people need to WTFU too.
Everyone lives in a psyop for perceptions from birth.
HOW MANY know about the U.S. CORPORATIONS 180,000 CAFR reporting, DUN&BRAD STREET rated, "gov/depts" CORPORATIONS, that are the majority share holder of the crony-FORTUNE500..
Then of course there is the meaning behind CAPITAL LETTERS used. Check your own "official documents".
As you can see instead of going down its going all over the city into peoples lungs into peoples blood streams and destroying peoples immunities what else can I say
The book is called "Where did the towers go?" by Dr. Judy Wood. Try to find a book about controlled demolition that is more comprehensive than Judy Wood's book. If you're still on the controlled demolition story it must hurt to consider the buildings barely hit the ground
@oversober I used to believe in the "controlled demolition" theory, until I discovered Dr Judy Wood's research. Her research is BY FAR the best research ever completed to date, on what really happened to the WTC and all the strange anomalies which occurred around the area that day.
@slverman@slverman explosives just dont turn 1M tons of steel and concrete into dust no larger than 80 microns in diameter. you're on that disinformation trail. thermite, controlled demolition, that's the official-unofficial story
@slverman explosives just dont turn 1M tons of steel and concrete into dust no larger than 80 microns in diameter. you're on that disinformation trail. thermite, controlled demolition, that's the official-unofficial story
@slverman explosives just dont turn 1M tons of steel and concrete into dust no larger than 80 microns in diameter. you're on that disinformation trail. thermite, controlled demolition, that's the official-unofficial story
@multisr16 then why haven't the "911 truthers" or their leaders filed a court case? judy wood has. i guess you think controlled demolition also rusted cars and turned cars into piles of junk? controlled demolition may have been used but it wasn't the only thing used.
hahah this is the most speculation ive ever seen jammed into an hr n half.., fuzzystuff? snowballs? maybe this maybe that, lathering up?? maybe maybe maybe., thats all she says., this is 100 percent disinfo?? she is taking everybody elses hard won research and taking a shit all over it., there were no space beams on 911, only controlled demolitions., this is so laughable its not even funny.,i like how she says shes been researching since right on 911 but only came out in 08 haha yeah right bitch
@MultiSr16 You're too fast man, immediately you came to the conclusion of controlled demolition without doing any work. You're head must hurt to think outside of the official-unofficial story. Dr. Wood knows what she is talking about, she's more than qualified to shed light on the WTC. she took a long time to do the work and present it. and she's not leaving out any evidence in her book
@oversober uhh i dont think so pal., and ive been researchin 911 since 04, so the only one who aint put in enough work ., is your mom.., dr woods is full of SHIT
@MultiSr16 uhh shuttup pal, you didn't research a damn thing. you're on that corporate mass media tip faggot. I used to think it was controlled demolition too, but then i started looking at evidence.
@slverman This is just a observation of the evidence present. Its all concrete! Shes not offering a hypothasis of what happened, she is just showing us why the offical story dosnt make sense, and is horribly flawed!!
.. just when you think americans are complete dumb ass's - one of them pop's up to remind you why they hold most of the worlds IP. Brilliant job! well done. Please help solve this one.
nano-haze, fuzzy balls? - no way would media bookers use Dr Wood - a shame, where the evidence does require an explanation like hers
newsmanbluesman 2 weeks ago
Fused pair of handguns found in parked car and photoed in Fresh Kills as retained evidence. Of what, one is tempted to ask. But please Dr Judy, drop nicknames for phenomena eg toast, snowball, dustification. Like K Barrett DRGriffin and SJones, you can sound flippant - which is the temptation when illogic is boldy shoved at you and you're asked to swallow. I get it. But tone must be maintained & serious
newsmanbluesman 2 weeks ago
Right guys everyone here that sees this video demands the American Government reopens the investigation with an independent team of scientist's, engineer's, explosive experts etc. give a thumbs up to this comment. We have had enough of the lies and demand JUSTICE!!!
maneatslion 1 month ago
All of you denigrators, name callers, ridiculers, armchair quarterbacks who haven't gone the distance, slugging back your beers in front of the TV while she works tirelessly......Dr. Wood has more brains in her little toe than all of your heads put together...silly twits imagining that your comments will be taken seriously. Maybe you're just not using enough terms like Dingbat, Moron, Pseudoscience, and tinfoil hats,,,come on,,,say more of them, maybe it will work...or Not.
TwitSpotter 1 month ago
Instant rust..., cars with "vanished" engine blocks..., selective "toasting" on this-or-that vehicle...
Have a look at this, where many of the "toasted cars" wound up:
watchv=w1aXxIVitZU&feature=channel_video_title
All the fantastic high-tech resources used to pull-off this treasonous crime -- and Dr. Judy, with an off-kilter projection screen and rickety mic, puts the LIE to this abominable deception. :D
The Monsters' Pets caught their sweater caught on a nail and now IT'S UNRAVELLING.
911TruthWillOut 1 month ago
If this dingbat had any scientific explanation for what she thinks explains all the discrepancies she thinks she sees in her photos, she wouldn't have to make up her own retardified language. She should also look into the definition of "concise". This fools science fiction fans, but not those who've actually studied science. 59:33 Is the most relevant question asked from the audience, and nope, she doesn't explain anything almost an hour into part 2.
belowthepovertyline 3 months ago
@belowthepovertyline She's asking a lot of questions. One thing we DO know is the "official theory" is load of BS for starters. To find the culprits you need to follow the money trail
HardcoreJungFunk 3 months ago
@belowthepovertyline Yes, dingbat,,,terms like these, and "tinfoil hat",,,,etc. you people still think that Ridicule will dissuade people from looking a little bit closer at the LIES we are being told. The LIES aren't working anymore,,,and so they must rush to Police State, or World War, etc. to create such chaos that their Crimes will become irrelevant. But they Won't. The World is waking up. Whether or not HER takeis correct - it is clear that the Official Story is BUNK.
TwitSpotter 1 month ago
@TwitSpotter Yes, but JW's theory is based on faulty premises, cherrypicked photos, and pseudoscience. Therefore, it should be discredited--even the truth movement has disowned her. If you're searching for the truth and want a new investigation, wouldn't you want a unified movement? As they say, it's good to have an open mind, but not so open that your brain falls out. That's exactly what's happened with JW's crowd. And many others.
belowthepovertyline 1 month ago
@belowthepovertyline As a physicist who worked with NASA's Breakthrough Propulsion Physics program I question words like Pseudoscience. Who decides what is pseudoscience - is it really nonsense - or perhaps science which is just not yet understood or widely known? Do YOU know? I don't...and a mind so open that "your brain falls out"...well you can worry about such a mishap for yourself,,,but it's certainly nothing that will keep me from sleeping at night...I prefer wide open
TwitSpotter 1 month ago
@TwitSpotter OK, pick whatever term you like. Maybe non-science. Hell, call it science if you want, but that's not what it is. Calling a collapsing building an ice cream cone or burning cars cheetos or dust/smoke "fumes" is silly. If your wide open mind keeps you considering impossibilities, that's a problem--like those fools who still believe perpetual motion is possible. Not being able to rule things out is like mental hoarding, and it's anathema to science.
belowthepovertyline 1 month ago
@belowthepovertyline And YOU are determining what is and isn't science? I don't think so...only in your own mind. No one appointed you. Some of the craziest ideas turned out to be the Right ones. Max Planck said that a certain theory wasn't likely the right one as it wasn't crazy enough. There is a difference between "Perpetual Motion" and "overunity generators" which most are referring to...Modern "science" is a Church - a set of "paradigms" with a very limited "Shelf-Life"
TwitSpotter 1 month ago
@TwitSpotter Yes, I am determining what is and isn't science in this case--we ALL should be able to do that, but most people are scientifically illiterate. JW looks at pictures of a building clearly falling, cars clearly burned, fires clearly burning and attributes these phenomena to the effects of a man who makes videos that can't be replicated, and who apparently doesn't document his experimental protocols.
Max Planck's quote doesn't apply across the board, I'm afraid.
belowthepovertyline 1 month ago
@belowthepovertyline You're just arrogant, man...and pretty much unteachable. You think you a lot more than you do - you're a Poser...there are thousands like you...If you make a "strong" statement (strong in YOUR mind) you think you've won an argument. You've won nothing and will win nothing-but don't let that stop you from looking in the mirror and telling yourself how smart you are. You're not worthy of carrying Dr. Wood's books. Nothing can be determined from this video.
TwitSpotter 1 month ago
@TwitSpotter Should say you think you KNOW a lot more than you do-You might want to apply for a gig with the Skeptical Inquirer...I think they could use a guy like you-or maybe even "Quackwatch"-there's a guy who hasn't practiced a day of medicine in his life, didn't pass his boards, and rags on sincere doctors doing unusual and wonderful work outside the mainstream. You paint too simple a picture - a crime scene was criminally destroyed. Bless her for trying to make sense of it.
TwitSpotter 1 month ago
@TwitSpotter But her arguments are based on JH's work, which hasn't been proven, apparently can't be replicated, and have only been poorly explained by the man himself. Well of course I'm skeptical!! As they say in medicine (since you brought it up), when you see hoof prints, think horse before zebra. She sees overturned cars in the midst of collapsed skyscrapers and thinks "ah yes, levitation".
I'll check out Quackwatch, thanks.
belowthepovertyline 1 month ago
@belowthepovertyline But you've got spirit man,,,good for you,,,stay with it...no hard feelings, good luck to you...
TwitSpotter 1 month ago
@TwitSpotter Same to you, and have a good night.
belowthepovertyline 1 month ago
@TwitSpotter Yes, I have made up my mind about JW, and there isn't anything in her arguments that I (or anyone) need to remain teachable about. Her website is 1) a mess, 2) full of questions in lieu of assertions, and 3) seriously flawed observations. I haven't won anything because we're just bickering, not having an argument about JW's "evidence". I would not deign to carry this woman's books, thank you very much, her insanity might be contagious.
belowthepovertyline 1 month ago
@belowthepovertyline Ah, now you're qualified to determine her "sanity," You're an expert on so many things. And so confident in your pronouncements. I would recommend sales work for you, but not science. Having worked with very advanced physics applications of next step propulsion, etc. which is beyond the training of mainstream physics, I am very accustomed to know-nothings casting aspersions. It used to bother me. Now I just smile, like I am smiling right now.
TwitSpotter 1 month ago
@TwitSpotter As an example, JW thinks the burned cars look funny. They don't; they look like many other burned cars I've seen pics of. Plastic door handles burn, upholstery burns, and sometimes the engine compartment burns without the gas tank igniting. Paper covered in dust doesn't necessarily ignite efficiently, and pictures of overturned cars in the context of two skyscraper collapses isn't compelling evidence for levitation. That's wild speculation.
belowthepovertyline 1 month ago
@belowthepovertyline Something I found out recently. Most door handles are made of aluminium. I always thought they were plastic until I started pulling many apart and sanding them back as part of the profession. "Oh, aluminium, cool" Also, many engines are made of alloy blocks and heads, some with alloy heads and cast iron blocks...overall mix of alloy, iron, steel parts. Also the detail of ONE car turned over while a half dozen right next to it aren't does seem odd
papapetad 3 weeks ago
@belowthepovertyline Dr. Wood is anything but silly...she is making analogies, etc. It is only a way to "talk" about things that are not yet entirely clear. Thinking outside the box is not a bad thing...and sometimes is necessary. There will always be naysayers and Inquisition type minds that discourage and denigrate, and often turn out to be the ones who are wrong. You have to be careful about being too opinionated, especially when you don't have enough information.
TwitSpotter 1 month ago
Yeah, alka seltzer and wheat chex and fumes and "toasted" cars. You need to use those words to exclude the bias of scientific terms, right? Like the subsequent confusion and ridicule you introduce won't outweigh that. Did this woman seriously attend grad school?
belowthepovertyline 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dimitri Khalezov's 9-11 Nuclear Demolition Videos ....Quite frankly the only explanation that makes sense ....
democracyoreugenics 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dimitri Khalezov's 9-11 Nuclear Demolition Videos Being Scrubbed Off Web!
democracyoreugenics 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
An actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was captured on film. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is currently parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything...I'm just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG contains the peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers" (use search words "Sam Zurick" & "BLOG"). THANKS!!
peopledick 4 months ago
What did she prove? The official story is a lie.
AikenBruce 4 months ago
She was very clear when she said a few times that she was going over the data, not to make an conclusion, just to show facts. Remember, what happened, how it happened..so on. She is just showing what happened. She made some very interesting observations that others have overlooked. She did a great job at raising some questions that noone thought to ask. She did her job. Now the pros need to find out the answers to the questions she helped us to ask.
quickdrawboi 4 months ago
2 hrs waiting for an explanation that never came. Ok I got it, it's dust and there's missing material but HOW was this done???
Thumbs up but really wtf!!!
AAAXXX9999 5 months ago
@AAAXXX9999 To everyone who still is wondering how it happened I would like to direct you to the research of Nikola Tesla.
AikenBruce 4 months ago 2
Please Judy.. Please kill yourself.
ThePeepee225 5 months ago
Dr? How did this moron earn a Phd? Great job on pointing out random shit and not providing any backing. 'This doesn't look like smoke to me' welcome to the world of atmospheric study 'DR' Judy Dumbass, that's called steam or FOG. Ever seen what smoke does on an early morning? It doesn't rise into the atmosphere, it stays low due to the high humidity. 'Doesn't look like a collapse to me' ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS? You are a blatant idiot and a disgrace. You really are.
bullzisnipr3 5 months ago
@bullzisnipr3 Go turn on the television and watch the news for your daily feed of propaganda.
AikenBruce 4 months ago
thank you judy for finally finding the truth about how it was done.
0TheChinaSyndrome0 5 months ago 8
@0TheChinaSyndrome0 ..yeah but now what...now what do we do? Nobody has an answer for that. All these 911 truthers say is we need to educate the public....yeah, it's been 10 years, the people who know and accept the truth have already done so.....and nothing is happening. SO...
SUPPORT THE SEPT 11TH, 2001 RESEARCH AND DISCOVERY PROJECT!
SUBSCRIBE TODAY!
Sept11Discovery 3 months ago
She keeps pointing out weird shit. What I am missing, is why? If the cars are toasted, explain it, for pete's sake. Two hours of questions, but Judy, for the love of god, postulate some answers!!
thirtythree303 5 months ago
excuse me it can't be possible that this is recorded on a cell phone or smth, can't we get some better quality of this video?
forugh3 5 months ago
Worst. Public. Speaker. Ever.
DannelDoo 5 months ago
dr. judy wood is 100% DISINFORMATION AND MISINFORMATION.
Case closed - Nano Thermite + other explosives were used to bring down all THREE World Trade Centers.
Your favorites look ok , lets not forget
"The Tavistock Institue of Human Relations" & "the commitee of 300" by Dr John coleman.
secret societes Fabians, Freemasons, Jesuits,etc...& Bankers.
search: Norman Dodd, Depopulation (Georgia Guide Stones), Bolshevik Revolution, UNCED agenda 21, codex alimentarius, Niels Harrit
Fetzer=Shill
letsgomd 6 months ago
@letsgomd if you can make a distinction between DISINFORMATION AND MISINFORMATION I'll give it a thought.
forugh3 5 months ago
Another eloquent theory. I hope she's wrong, because an official re-examination of 9/11 will never be allowed to investigate something so top-secret. Of course, there's probably not much chance we'll get a re-examination at all. The military-industrial complex is now in complete control of our governmental infrastructures, including courts.
FirstUsedBooks 7 months ago
without having to listen to this incredibly boring woman i would say she's saying that they used a HAARP type Tesla technology to disintegrate the towers, i agree with her but she needs to learn how to present this
dreadblitz 7 months ago
@dreadblitz this is one of the interesting speakers, as far as I have noticed
forugh3 5 months ago
@nebula25x Ok, I will have a look into it then. I don't believe it was an inside job, but for sure, somebody on the inside knows who it was. And they don't want the public to know who it is. I have an faint idea...
manoman0 7 months ago
@nebula25x I didn't look much into it, but is Dr. Wood basically saying some ELFs/Scalar weapons or Nukes went off?
manoman0 7 months ago
It looks like the WTC instantly disintegrated into dust as it came down..
manoman0 8 months ago
Maybe the British and Americans we should apologize to Islam
Marcus538 8 months ago
@Marcus538 Why should the British and American's apologize....it's the elite global criminals that need to bow down...the "Islamic" people need to WTFU too.
Everyone lives in a psyop for perceptions from birth.
HOW MANY know about the U.S. CORPORATIONS 180,000 CAFR reporting, DUN&BRAD STREET rated, "gov/depts" CORPORATIONS, that are the majority share holder of the crony-FORTUNE500..
Then of course there is the meaning behind CAPITAL LETTERS used. Check your own "official documents".
IronRangeSurvival 7 months ago
@IronRangeSurvival Does this sound like America, We the People, or Constitutional rule of law?
911 was just part of a coup....one part.
IronRangeSurvival 7 months ago
Is DR Woodhas still alive?
Marcus538 8 months ago
As you can see instead of going down its going all over the city into peoples lungs into peoples blood streams and destroying peoples immunities what else can I say
essy111 8 months ago
She's naive about Hiroshima. Sigh.
rerevisionist 8 months ago
Thank you so much Dr Judy Wood! Please don't give up, keep speaking the truth..keep reporting your findings, because nobody else will.
fox2 8 months ago
The book is called "Where did the towers go?" by Dr. Judy Wood. Try to find a book about controlled demolition that is more comprehensive than Judy Wood's book. If you're still on the controlled demolition story it must hurt to consider the buildings barely hit the ground
oversober 8 months ago
@oversober I used to believe in the "controlled demolition" theory, until I discovered Dr Judy Wood's research. Her research is BY FAR the best research ever completed to date, on what really happened to the WTC and all the strange anomalies which occurred around the area that day.
Dr Judy Wood is a strong, brave lady.
fox2 8 months ago
@slverman @slverman explosives just dont turn 1M tons of steel and concrete into dust no larger than 80 microns in diameter. you're on that disinformation trail. thermite, controlled demolition, that's the official-unofficial story
oversober 8 months ago
@slverman explosives just dont turn 1M tons of steel and concrete into dust no larger than 80 microns in diameter. you're on that disinformation trail. thermite, controlled demolition, that's the official-unofficial story
oversober 8 months ago
@slverman explosives just dont turn 1M tons of steel and concrete into dust no larger than 80 microns in diameter. you're on that disinformation trail. thermite, controlled demolition, that's the official-unofficial story
oversober 8 months ago
@multisr16 then why haven't the "911 truthers" or their leaders filed a court case? judy wood has. i guess you think controlled demolition also rusted cars and turned cars into piles of junk? controlled demolition may have been used but it wasn't the only thing used.
alt132000 8 months ago
hahah this is the most speculation ive ever seen jammed into an hr n half.., fuzzystuff? snowballs? maybe this maybe that, lathering up?? maybe maybe maybe., thats all she says., this is 100 percent disinfo?? she is taking everybody elses hard won research and taking a shit all over it., there were no space beams on 911, only controlled demolitions., this is so laughable its not even funny.,i like how she says shes been researching since right on 911 but only came out in 08 haha yeah right bitch
MultiSr16 8 months ago
@MultiSr16 You're too fast man, immediately you came to the conclusion of controlled demolition without doing any work. You're head must hurt to think outside of the official-unofficial story. Dr. Wood knows what she is talking about, she's more than qualified to shed light on the WTC. she took a long time to do the work and present it. and she's not leaving out any evidence in her book
oversober 8 months ago
@oversober uhh i dont think so pal., and ive been researchin 911 since 04, so the only one who aint put in enough work ., is your mom.., dr woods is full of SHIT
MultiSr16 8 months ago
@MultiSr16 uhh shuttup pal, you didn't research a damn thing. you're on that corporate mass media tip faggot. I used to think it was controlled demolition too, but then i started looking at evidence.
oversober 8 months ago
@slverman This is just a observation of the evidence present. Its all concrete! Shes not offering a hypothasis of what happened, she is just showing us why the offical story dosnt make sense, and is horribly flawed!!
uchimomogeri 9 months ago
Wow ! Makes the mystery come out into the open , never could put together all the dots , til now !
craigdhueser 10 months ago
.. just when you think americans are complete dumb ass's - one of them pop's up to remind you why they hold most of the worlds IP. Brilliant job! well done. Please help solve this one.
srkh28 1 year ago
@srkh28 fantastic, isn't it?
manoman0 8 months ago