Added: 2 years ago
From: SSL9000Down
Views: 25,750
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (41)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • all the la2a emus suck but the waves is the best sounding

  • can i please get the drum loop?

  • There is little to NO audible difference between the two>But I tell you this>Run that drumloop through an actual Hardware Unit, AND YOU'LL HEAR A BIG CHANGE IN THE TONE RIGHT AWAY>>>PLUGINS ARE A BIG HYPE!! They add little to no sonic change in the sound>place 7 DAW compressors on the same source>set at the same settings, and you'll hear they all mainly sound the same>with only a 12% variation of change from each other. and they do not add the warmth as that the Hardware units add at all. HYPE

  • gracias!

    

  • Not that drum loop again!!

  • Don't forget that the Waves Compressors are actually modelled on Chris Lord Alge's 2A's which may not be the teletronix ones??

  • im confused dam it ! ! ! !

  • It's hard to tell much from this, but the Waves is clearly much faster in the release both in metering and in sonics. The word on the street is the LA-2A has a fairly slow release, not that emulating is that important.

    

  • ...just sell, I meant...

  • Comment removed

  • waves plugins look better in my opinion and that counts too.

  • @ColdGripHandle You better be trolling.

  • @webbguitar He's probably not :D

  • @webbguitar That's a definite troll

  • Fine!

  • WTH is this =O

  • Thumbs up if you read the first page of the argument between quathar and regaltipper and think they both behaved like children lol

    At any rate, I feel like demo'ing compressors on YouTube is about as pointless as listening for the dynamic range of a song on pop radio:S Thanks for these videos anyway, SSL9000Down. They're good for drooling over even if the sonic comparisons are somewhat difficult to gauge:)

  • AGAIN< IF YOU"RE GONA A/B, MAKE SURE YOUR SETTINGS ARE THE SAME!!!!!! Isn't that common sense??????????

  • @regaltipper No. You are not testing if the units sound the same at the same settings, but only if they sound the same.

  • @quathar 's .... ",but only if they sound the same"... at different settings? Your comment makes no sense. The only way you can test to see if they are the same is to A/B them. Which means they both have the same input and output levels. If not, of course you're going to get two different sounds and therefore not be able to compare them.. I'd think that would be obvious... obvious to someone that knows even the slightest about audio engineering.

  • @regaltipper Comparing the settings only compare what they sound like at THAT particular setting. That can be different depending on the algorithm used, and the only thing that tells you is if the units work exactly the same. It is a good starting point, but what I would be really interested in, in this case, is testing if they SOUND similar, i.e. if the sound quality matches of Waves matches UAD i.e. if you are able to get the same, good, sound/compression out of both.

  • @quathar The flaw in what your saying is that you may like one setting on one, but like a different setting on the other. So how would you know which one to get? You have to a/b in order for it to be a comparison and for you to be able to put a "vs" in the video title.

  • @regaltipper That doesn't change anything. If you like the plugs equally but on different settings, then it's a toss up and you could get either. The point here is functionality, not specific settings. You could for instance test compressing different instruments and vocals and see which one performs to your liking. It's about comparing circumstances and sound under those circumstances, not specifically exact settings. Clear as mud?

  • @quathar Yes it's clear. It's clear you don't understand how to a/b.

  • @regaltipper Is that it? You have some desperate youtube need to win even tho you've clearly run out of arguments? Go look at some A/B tests between plugs and outboard units on gearslutz and educate yourself instead of being a wiseass.

  • @quathar Ya I am telling you that this is not how you a/b test. That is all I am saying. I have not run out of arguments, you just don't understand so I've decided to give up on talking to you. Thanks, and good luck.

  • @regaltipper Well, you haven't refuted anything of what I said with any sensible arguments, so there is nothing TO understand. Just being obstinate isn't an argument.

  • @quathar HAHAHA Are you fucking kidding me. If you knew two shits about what I was saying, you'd know I have already made my point. You're too excited about winning an argument, you've lost your common sense. I'm sorry but it's hard to argue with an ignoramus. Take care quather. I won't be responding.

  • @regaltipper Your point was flawed, and I disproved it. Simple as that, cheers, Einstein.

  • @quathar My point was not flawed. You just can't fuckin understand it! Please, before you reply, try to understand what I am saying. Go back and look at what I've already said. Then try to process that. Then process that I have been an engineer for 20 some years and I know what I am talking about. Then think to yourself, is it worth it to argue with someone that knows they are right? Then realize it's not. And don't comment.

  • @regaltipper It was flawed. If you really have been an engineer for 20 years you should know better: Again, if the point of the A/B test is to see how well the effects match up in ALL ASPECTS, then you are right. But you usually test the functionality and SOUND. If you wanna test a certain amount of audible and measurable compression in this case (gain reduction etc), you HAVE TO dial in the settings so the compression matches up. This really isn't that complicated.

  • @quathar Yes, I agree with what you are saying. I am disagreeing with how this video is comparing. They should have tested them at the same settings increasing input and gain reduction at the same times to hear how they differ. However they changes levels in no particular order so it makes it very difficult to compare the two plugins.

  • @regaltipper Fine. Agreed. Then.

  • cla2a rocks ua2a period.

  • nice

  • You absolutely have to also include dynamic Vocals in any compression test--nothing shows the differences like Vocals.

  • @Rizzy55

    damn straight!!!! nice post!! i'm just getting the hang of the CLA-2A oer the past year or so...it's rather simple, but will make or break your mix...

  • Can't really tell what's going on here... Is it soloing the track that is selected?

  • plus, to really compare you have to apply the same settings and listen it in WAV !

    : )

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more