They also seem to use to different models, when we look at the Video evidence of 911 twin towers, we see the plan go in to the building and make a 'MASSIVE' impact.. in the Pentagram, we see a Tiiiiny little whole..
There's another film of the pentagon being hit LOOK and see the truth it's a small plane or missle. The youtube world aka people just type in pentagon 911 and look you'll see this new post of a good looking view of NO commercial aircraft weighing 60 tons going 400mph!!
The simulation of the plane forming into an artillery shell fireball and making the 16 foot hole totally violates the laws of physics. First, the plane had already been torn to shreds and gone up in a 1st fireball, so it's physically impossible for it to have any energy left to form this 2nd fireball. It's also a violation of the laws of motion for this fireball to accelerate itself from near 0 to a super high speed. Further, the Purdue simulation of the attack looks COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.
Only the officials of the secret service, and a few members of the government know what has happened that day. What came public is another story. We can not be sure 100% of that the official story of 9/11 is true (or not).
When they say the collapse was caused by the impact of the plane it doesn't make sense. The buildings were hit so high up that it couldn't of affected the foundation of the building, which as we all know is located at the very bottom.So how does a fire at the top,cause the whole building to collapse demolition style without the foundation being hit? Wouldn't it make sense that if the steel melted it would've caused the above portion off the build to fall sideways? and not demolish the building
@BuddyIStalking Because Americans blew out the supports under it and seconds later it came crashing down. Everyone knows that Americans blew up their own towers to try and get the world against Al-Qaeda.
what bullshit this whole series is! it's so obvious that the official theory is bunk. just think about a steel structure built to scale in your living room. think about how long it would take for a fire to burn 2/3 of the way up that structure in order for the steel structure to collapse as it did on 9/11. it just can't happen like that and anyone who says otherwise is a fool or getting money from someone who is dictating the results in advance.
@ho2cultcha You can't just pull stuff like that out of your butt and expect veteran fire fighters to buy it. The structure was already damaged, and the damage was assymetrical. the heat applied to it was asymetrical. Even undagaed steel structures have collapsed from the same kind of heat. Don't get started about "no steel skyscraper..."There was never that kind of damage to one like the towers before, either.
They also seem to use to different models, when we look at the Video evidence of 911 twin towers, we see the plan go in to the building and make a 'MASSIVE' impact.. in the Pentagram, we see a Tiiiiny little whole..
kundalini77 2 months ago
What gets me is the people that are on the conspiracy side are not considered "experts" i think this doco is one sided.
farley34 2 months ago
There's another film of the pentagon being hit LOOK and see the truth it's a small plane or missle. The youtube world aka people just type in pentagon 911 and look you'll see this new post of a good looking view of NO commercial aircraft weighing 60 tons going 400mph!!
inacarjam 4 months ago
The simulation of the plane forming into an artillery shell fireball and making the 16 foot hole totally violates the laws of physics. First, the plane had already been torn to shreds and gone up in a 1st fireball, so it's physically impossible for it to have any energy left to form this 2nd fireball. It's also a violation of the laws of motion for this fireball to accelerate itself from near 0 to a super high speed. Further, the Purdue simulation of the attack looks COMPLETELY DIFFERENT.
fanof2012 5 months ago
@fanof2012
and they omitted that before the outer wall of pentagon collapse there was a very small hole.....where are the engines holes?...the marks of the wings
and that fireball simulation is so ridiculous....and wtc7 they say that wtc4,5,6 collapsed too FALSE, they were really destroyed but standing.....
the "wing" scar of united93 crash was there in 1994 how?, the simulation of the crash with 0 momentum after crash....so stupid too
truth will be reavealed wait 40 years
craksracing0com 4 months ago
I wonder, if a plane flew into mcdonalds how many bullshit conspiracy theroies will pop up.
NathanRaven 5 months ago 3
After painstaking research it seems to me that the following took place.
1) US government fired a missile into its own military headquarters
2) Organised to have plane debris placed at the scene directly after
3) Doused the impact zone with aviation fuel
4) and convinced over 130 eyewitnesses to lie about what they saw.
It all makes sense. Wake up people!
amul83 5 months ago
Only the officials of the secret service, and a few members of the government know what has happened that day. What came public is another story. We can not be sure 100% of that the official story of 9/11 is true (or not).
joefrey007 5 months ago
im saying no americans did not blow up the towers...
BuddyIStalking 6 months ago
When they say the collapse was caused by the impact of the plane it doesn't make sense. The buildings were hit so high up that it couldn't of affected the foundation of the building, which as we all know is located at the very bottom.So how does a fire at the top,cause the whole building to collapse demolition style without the foundation being hit? Wouldn't it make sense that if the steel melted it would've caused the above portion off the build to fall sideways? and not demolish the building
BuddyIStalking 7 months ago
@BuddyIStalking Because Americans blew out the supports under it and seconds later it came crashing down. Everyone knows that Americans blew up their own towers to try and get the world against Al-Qaeda.
Kutittaa 6 months ago
@Kutittaa no Americans blew those towers up
BuddyIStalking 6 months ago
@BuddyIStalking That's what I said.
Kutittaa 6 months ago
truthers = retards
terrymanning1 9 months ago
That Shafquat woman is so dim! I'd like to clunkity clunk her 100 times. WITH A FUCKING PICK AXE!
terrymanning1 10 months ago 2
wow, this docco is really bad. At least the History Jock could let obrien talk without muting him them speaking for him.
srkh28 10 months ago
what bullshit this whole series is! it's so obvious that the official theory is bunk. just think about a steel structure built to scale in your living room. think about how long it would take for a fire to burn 2/3 of the way up that structure in order for the steel structure to collapse as it did on 9/11. it just can't happen like that and anyone who says otherwise is a fool or getting money from someone who is dictating the results in advance.
ho2cultcha 10 months ago
@ho2cultcha You can't just pull stuff like that out of your butt and expect veteran fire fighters to buy it. The structure was already damaged, and the damage was assymetrical. the heat applied to it was asymetrical. Even undagaed steel structures have collapsed from the same kind of heat. Don't get started about "no steel skyscraper..."There was never that kind of damage to one like the towers before, either.
leftysergeant 10 months ago
@leftysergeant then why didn't their fall end up being asymetrical? it didn't.
ho2cultcha 10 months ago
@ho2cultcha It was assymetrical, moron. Didn't you see the tilt in the top of the south tower?
leftysergeant 10 months ago