@CrzyManVideos The counter outputs only one signal. The decoder turns that signal into multiple different signals, each going to the right segments on the display. It is still necessary.
@johntzwei so you suggest rather than having one counter and one decoder, i have 7 counters and no decoder? That would just be less efficient and slower probably.
This has been flagged as spam show
hi plz check out my channel, i liked and subbed :)
TheDarkRaider126 4 months ago
Could you replace the many piston counters with one horizontal one, and a line of repeaters passing the current to the ‘active’ number?
aberbeta 5 months ago
can u make a tutorial??
techguy19 6 months ago
@techguy19 oh wait lol XD nvm
techguy19 6 months ago
@techguy19 no wait forget the one below! XD
techguy19 6 months ago
you could also skip the decoder completely, and just use the counter instead
CrzyManVideos 6 months ago
@CrzyManVideos The counter outputs only one signal. The decoder turns that signal into multiple different signals, each going to the right segments on the display. It is still necessary.
SubAtomicStudios 6 months ago
@SubAtomicStudios
But then you have 7 different counters, with glass and all that, wired so when the button is pressed 7 counters move, and it is wired as a decoder
johntzwei 6 months ago
@johntzwei so you suggest rather than having one counter and one decoder, i have 7 counters and no decoder? That would just be less efficient and slower probably.
SubAtomicStudios 6 months ago
@SubAtomicStudios I'll give you my save file to look at. It is a bit unresponsive, but I'm sure it is just the settings with the repeaters.
I'll PM you the link, I do not think youtube allows links.
The save file is actually part of a clock. I'd love to work on the clock with you :)
johntzwei 6 months ago
@SubAtomicStudios can i get a link for the map too?
techguy19 6 months ago
That is the most practical counting method I have ever seen! Great job!
LegendaryRath 6 months ago