Added: 4 years ago
From: rockgeir
Views: 73,200
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (19)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Were you too scared to actually whip on them? :)

  • Dear CCH shills - you owe me 24 seconds.

  • All companies put out defective units. I had a c3 camalot bust on a fall just a couple months ago. Of course, they're made in China which makes quality control more difficult.

  • @JayT017

    What's to say the unit was defective and that you didn't place it incorrectly? It's not that hard to destroy a cam by falling on it if you place it wrong. So many people are ready to shoot down manufacturers yet never consider their own failures. Gear is rated for A1 perfect placements, if you place the cam incorrectly - oriented wrongly, incorrect contact points or where the wrong part of the cam will take the impact - there is a chance it will break.

  • @DjNefarious well said man people never see it that way my cams are all still in working order because i use them properly. and video is waste of time thank for that CCH shills or what ever

  • How much force exactly did you exert on this unit? How many units did you test? See what I'm saying here? This is kind of cool as a curiosity, but scientifically, it says very little, if anything at all.

  • Did you send this in to CCH and request a new alien?

    (and ask them not to outsource to a foreign country?)

  • i really like aliens and c4's

    those are the best

  • Proof that aliens are real.

  • ...

  • wow, what a kickass video.

  • ah. i see. you gave some slack, accelerated to (something) and let the protection "brake" the car? quite brave, i never knew any part of a car could take 31kN...

  • Depends on the car...or more likely, the Ford F-150.

  • Holy crap that must of been one bomber placement, what was on the end of the rope?

  • Really, this is neither here nor there. The exact charge that has been leveraged at CCH is that their process is inconsistent. It's perfectly capable of churning out good units, but there's been a LOT of abnormal Alien failures over the past couple years.

    Put simply, I don't like their odds well enough to bet on them.

  • anyone still using aliens is a fool

  • easy enough to do with the old-school alien you've got there. Try getting similar results with any of them manufactured after 2003

  • uffffffff

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more