That was supposed to be FUNNY?????? Talk about your PR own goal...I don't see ANYTHING funny in that advertisement. That film is entirely INDEFENSIBLE, my fine fellow. If you can't see that, there are no words in the English language to describe how sick you are.
Do we want to take the risk of following your bs? The risk of doing something about our innefficient technologies is less than doing nothing if we get it right it can save lots in the long run. Money, air pollution, etc.
I want to take a hammer and smash your teeth out because it think it is fucking hilarious, don't you? And, the message would serve to teach everyone to lower "carbon emissions" by making this sociopath dolt in the video unable to consume more than he needs to stay alive and continue being a debt slave to the bankers and corporations that fund the AGW hoax for their new money making scheme. HILARIOUS!
That commercial is very disturbed. I didn't watch it hoping to dislike it. I watched it and felt very disturbed seeing children who had a valid disagreement with their teacher being blown up. The kids were not "dickheads". They simply didn't want to participate in something which they disagreed with.
As easy as it would be to just call you stupid and be satisfied with myself, I am inclined to educate you first. There is no such thing as environazis, they are not an evil cult, it’s not a scare tactic it is humour, Granted quite shocking humour. But this advert was pulled.
The group haven’t used this advert for AGES. How the world works did his video about this add AFTER IT WAS PULLED. And he knew this. It’s on one of his own links that he put on that video, its not the first time he has put up a link to support his view only for it to be incorrect or a blatant lie.
I know what you are trying to say but some or a lot of children that watch this don't understand some kind of humor and not all people find that funny. I can honestly say I don't find it funny because I don't have that humor. At its core it is just a bit sick to think that 5 to 8 year olds watch this video, and see people being napalmed. I am though one of the people that has actually studies thermodynamics and physics properly and there is more evidence against the green theory than for it.
@callingheyzeus, wishful video, but only pure research with no practical cost effective implementation. Can't rely on what might be, must make do with what is.
"I see your point", no you missed it. Again, the "Green Police" ad seems to be saying ecofascists want to outlaw:
1. plastics
2. battery garbage
3. incandescent bulbs
4. water bottles
5. hot water
and those that don't comply will be arrested and jailed.
Is that an ACCURATE ad "fanatical and demented" message?
@callingheyzeus, watch the 1933 video YlLZE23EJKs and compare that to modern day ubiquitous mini-vans, 5th wheels, RVs. Still think the Dymaxion car (many ideas lifted from a 1929 Zaschka car) didn't go any where? Compare that to your nearest geodesic dome.
"the domes did [take off]" sorry domes and the strength of a triangle have been around in architecture for milleniums. Fuller's innovation was a cheap/modular unhidden support structure.
"synergetics-systems where the whole is greater than the sum of the parts", this concept is as old as man, as soon as you build anything this is true. The obvious example is a car.
"in other words systems of doing more with less", no that's efficiency.
Synergetics is a broad term for creating new properties by combining things with different properties.
@callingheyzeus, "wastes your time and it annoys the pig", you omitted half of this famous quote, the famous half, as well as omitted the quotes marks thus representing the words as your own. Both less then honest. "Never let [your] schooling get in the way..."
"Saying in the 1960's", way before my time, you're old.
"except Bucky Fuller", sorry never heard that one.
Fuller doesn't compare to DaVinci's broader range. Fuller's peak in my opinion was the Dymaxion car not the Geodesic dome
The Global Warming debate is controversial to begin with, seeing as some leaders in its movement are somewhat hypocritical. But when is making someone who disagrees with you explode "funny"?
Would killing everyone against the mosque at ground zero be funny?'
Would killing everyone "pro mother's-choice" be funny.(mother's-choice because the baby has none)
Would killing everyone against your least favorite world dictator be funny?
Some people actually see this sick "humor" as a threat.
@callingheyzeus, "burned out on looking", as I see it things are trivial and self-evident:
1. human walking is a 100s of 1000s of years sustainable activity that takes less calories then to mine, manufacture, fuel, and provide infrastructure for a 4000lb car
2. over time manufacturing/farming becomes MORE efficient not less as you claim
3. CO2 concentrations are rising fast in lock step with man made CO2 increases, not population growth.
@callingheyzeus, "problem of sustainability...changes in farming practices...fertilizers...feed livestock corn and grain...maximize production...irrigation...pesticides...herbicides...about 33% of our oil use" and your point is we are running out of oil and can't sustain the 33% required? If so go green technology.
The above dances around the fact that modern techniques increase efficiency more than enough to offsets the added cost, ie big net gain.
@callingheyzeus, AGAIN you didn't answer any of my questions. Scared the answers will prove my point?
"Got some more numbers...1940...2.3 calories of food energy for very calorie of fossil energy...by 1974 1:1...today...10:1...In the 1940s...100 barrels of oil back for every barrel of oil we spent getting it...Today...ten", where's the link?
If the above is true, then food production is 94% LESS efficient, and oil production 90% LESS efficient then in 1940. Negative improvement. Smell BS.
@callingheyzeus, "spent 8 hours looking for the answer to your questions", after all that you can only offer vagueness which in turn throws all your declared factoids out the window
AGAIN, repeat question "Earth's population is relatively stable, and yet CO2 output is increasing exponentially. Not bodies, but what then?"
You complain about humans walking, milk production, cows grazing, etc, all sustainable for 100s of 1000s years, yet THOSE ARE PROBLEMS and FOSSIL FUELS AREN'T. How so?
@callingheyzeus, "found one number that suggested it takes the energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gas to produce 1 gallon of gas", do you believe any nonsense that tends to support your bias? Trivial logic in trivial time will address this "factoid". If a gallon produced is off set by a gallon in production, then the net gain is ALWAYS zero. Obviously your "factoid" is BS without a link.
"Do we...?" first be a good sport and answer the previous 3 questions in my previous post.
At the Live Earth Concert at Giants Stadium, one of the non musical acts, Robert Kennedy Jr., shouted himself hoarse. He called those people who doubt either that global warming exists or that it is man-made or that it matters traitors and that they should be dealt with as such.
And of course, David GInola, great French footballer, love the guy. Im very into soccer (football, I live in America, I dont call it soccer by choice, just throwing that out there) and Im sure that Tottenham Hotspur arent eco-terrorists, Giovani dos Santos played for them (Im half Mexican). And I dont think that HTWW ever thought of it in literal terms either. Hes not stupid, no one is that stupid to suggest that these people are actually dying. Its a bit of s trawman your doing just saying.
@arikkonn, "Bomb, Bomb Iran" or "IEDs" or "Bush on fake WMD", doesn't compare to CGI deaths. The first batch of commetns have real and dealy consequences while CGI doesn't, even if you take CGI and edgy humor literally.
Ok are you serious man? "Two dickheads" You mean two CHILDREN who maybe just didnt want to hear the teacher, wanting to go home? Maybe the children werent politically motivated, no child is. Theres no way the video was hinting that the two kids were against 10:10 SOLELY because they disagree with it. Its not funny in the least bit. THe saying "No pressure" then killing them, tthats not funny, thats cruel. Its simply not funny.
OMG, you are SO right..the FUNNY side.. thats prolly why i was lmao at movies like SCANNERS and BODY SNATCHERS or other movies like that where they had scenes of ppl exploding while everyone else was screaming ... yeah, ppl need to loosen and laugh some more ...
@callingheyzeus, the point you dance around is comparing the total TRACED BACK cost of 1L of milk to burning 1L of petrol WITHOUT ANY TRACE BACK costs. QUESTION: Is that comparison grossly misleading or not?
The commonality is "humans walking", and how one human walking off 1L of milk (and it's traced back costs) compares to the 1000s of humans walking required to mine, manufacture, transport, etc. a car, oil, petrol while "you are sleeping".
@callingheyzeus, "producing 1 liter of milk is equivalent to burning 1 liter of petrol...1 liter=2kg CO2 for a car". Comparing an apple to pumpkin seed, instead of a giant punpkin?
1L milk is traced back to the ACCUMULATION of transportation, cow, its food, etc. and then compared to "burning 1 liter of petrol" WITH NO TRACE BACK.
That 1 liter of petrol had to be found, drilled, transported around half the world, stored, sold, and used in a car with an even bigger footprint. Clear?
@callingheyzeus, "my [one] source..."How to Live A Low-Carbon Life", does indeed claim on page 151 "walking 1.5 miles would generate...2kg of global warming gases, 4 or 5 times the amount...from driving". As the author considers the 140 calories requierd as TRACED BACK TO ROOT FOOD PRODUCTION versus gas burnt with NO TRACE BACK. Now add in all those calorie burning humans working hard (not on a Sunday afternoon stroll) to produce the car/oil/gas/roads/etc and get back to me.
@Hotrodrogers91, "an idiot for thinking I did" no only an idiot would think I was serious about you being an idiot.
"don't understand my humor...how in the crap could I double my emissions", oh I got your humor, in contrast to you completely missing the 1010 humor. While you were bent out of shape spouting outraged over the 1010 skits, I called you on your comment, and you admitted it was BS humor. Had you called out 1010 they'd have done the same, admit it was BS humor. "use your brain"
@Hotrodrogers91, "swearing makes you look dumber", and what swear words were used exactly? You don't say. Weren't any?
"Nobody should ever kid about blowing people up. Even in satire" is that is, or do you have other personal decrees a free society and speech must adhere to? Or what execatly? You'd press a red button and blow them up? LOL.
@Cnservative0rbust, "HTWW's comment on-screen... replace with an abortion issue THEN see who's laughing", obviously HTWW doesn't see the difference between edgy humor of a button being pressed with no actual consequences, and that of actual abortion procedure. A room full of babies with those being actually aborted blowing up (real implied deaths), is a far cry from the edgy humor in the video.
@Hotrodrogers91, "killing children", talk about "look dumber". No children or adults were harmed in the skits, and before you ask, no Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, etc, etc are not mass murderers.
"I am going to double my emissions", well at least you have goals, lets us know when you've paid off your doubled fuel bill.
@callingheyzeus, "walking can produce as much as 4 times the Carbon emissions as driving...Who's laughing with me now", LOL I'm laughing at you and your nonsense opinion.
How about you:
1. provide a reputable link proving this "factoid"
2. explain how atmospheric CO2 content rises with fossil fuel burning not the population.
@bulabula1, thing is humor is individualistic and various widely. Saying "NOTHING funny", doesn't prove anything other then a delusion that your personal opinion is a defacto standard that trumps reality.
The obvious intent, was to gain wide attention through edgy humor. However even though the skits were pulled near immediately from the 1010global(dot)org site, thanks to loud cry-baby detractors (such as yourself) the skits and 1010's goals have attained for more exposure. Keep it up.
@MyOwnYTAccount, "murdering children" you do realize that science is very from a button that can direct 5lbs of TNT limited to a child's body? Edgy humor obviously not meant to be taking LITERALLY by anyone, but obviously that reality flew over the head of some.
Then again why don't you forward this undeserving video to everyone you know, and spread 1010's goals of 10% CO2 reducation during 2010. The more exposure the better, and the right wing wingnuts have been doing a great job.
@MyOwnYTAccount, "the technology to buid for remotely detonated shaped charges is actually very easy to improvise", well I've been pressing a button over here and it you respond that will prove that the 5lbs of TNT supposedly in your watch didn't go off, let alone the force field restricting the blast to your body.
Are you done claiming science fiction is science fact?
"suffering so many casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan", IEDs are a far cry from the Sci-Fi you claim is already here.
@revelinabandon, "It wasn't funny", well good for you, glad you shared your personal opinion, now poll the rest of humanity, or better yet, go tell everyone you know about this video. Spread 1010's goals of reducing carbon emmissions by 10% this year, 1010 couldn't have dreamed of a wider exposure then what the right has already given it.
@ZangaroZen Hate to break it to you, but no one cares. Global warming has been delegitimized by the introduction of profiteering. It's a scam, and nobody believes the scientists because they don't trust their employers' motives. It doesn't matter how much attention this gets. It's going to turn more people off than on. Poll the rest of humanity itself. You'll find most don't care to follow shrill zealots that would have them bottling their farts.
@revelinabandon, "no one cares", really? funny how Annie Leonard's videos got 10 million views in one year, and spawned other videos and a book. Maybe YOU don't care, then again you did comment.
"delegitimized by...profiteering", filling a need, is part of capitalism, which apparently you dispise as well.
"nobody believes the scientists" if YOU feel that strongly, then eat only junk food, have unprotected sex, never see a doctor, etc.
"bottling...farts" you pwn yourself that nonsense.
@ZangaroZen Since you want to play semantics I'll speak in absolutes. Many fewer people care much about this issue than you would like.
I don't despise capitalism. I despise paying something for nothing, especially when that nothing is government sponsored and mandatory. Any kind of carbon emissions tax is going to be opposed and defeated.
I don't trust most global warming scientists you twit, not all scientists.
Bottling farts is hyperbole. As a leftist you should be familiar with that.
@ZangaroZen You're ridiculous. I don't do numbers on this stuff. That's someone else's job. I'll assume you want everyone to care like you do, and I'm confident most do not. When the zealots get so shrill they have to blow up childrens heads and splatter everyone with gore for attention, it's clear they are desperate for an audience. My environment is clean and sustainable now. I'm not buying some false product. Thank a vet? Apples and oranges. The quacks are the progressives. Fuck em and fuck u
@revelinabandon, "You're ridiculous", apparently so is calling you out to back your empty nonsense opinions with facts.
"I don't do numbers on this stuff" agreed you only make up BS; reread the above sentence.
"I'll asume you want everyone to care like you do", WRONG, do hope experts in the know are the basis for those in power making the right decisions. What Monckton-like quacks do is irrelevant.
"desperate for an audience" and got a world wide one.
@ZangaroZen Then fuck yourself. Everything I'm saying common sense. It doesn't matter if these kooks got a world wide audience. The general consensus is they got a bad review, which will furthur turn people away. So good for them. Dickheads like you can only do the job piecemeal.
Encouraging people to reduce pollution, conserve and increase cleaner, renewable sources is fine because it's the right thing to do. Ramming it down their throats by falsifying a global scare is not.
If you think this is funny you are a sick human being. Some of us don't think it's funny to blow up children or anyone else who disagrees with you. Many man-mad global warming alarmists have said that those who disagree with their nonsense should be jailed or killed. That's the people you associate with.
@nadeau, this may come as a surprise to you but no "children or anyone else" were harmed in the production of the skits.
"Many man-mad global warming alarmists have said that those who disagree with their nonsense should be jailed or killed", how much is many? More than ZERO?
@ZangaroZen You're not very bright are you? Unlike most environmentalists I can tell the difference between fantasy and reality.
E. Ralph Hostetter
The global warming debate within certain minority groups of the far left has become confrontational. Now circulating is such shocking language as, "At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers? Shouldn't we start punishing them now?" These words came from Talking Point Memo, an agenda-setting website of the far left.
@nadeau, "You're not very bright are you?...I can tell the difference between fantasy and reality...execute global warming deniers...words came from...website of the far left", so what's your point? That anyone can find any nonsense opinion on the internet? Don't have to be very bright to know that. Got to be incredibly stupid to think you can and pass off internet nonsense as mainstream fact.
@ZangaroZen In 2006, the eco-magazine Grist called for Nuremberg-Style trials for skeptics. In 2008, Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki called for government leaders skeptical of global warming to be thrown “into jail.” In 2007, The Weather Channel's climate expert called for withholding certification of skeptical meteorologists.
@nadeau, "Nurembery-style trials...thrown into jail...withholding certification of skeptical meteorologists", and this proves what? That people say all sorts of things during idle talk and don't act on any of it? Not worth a moment's gossip
As for meteorologist, they generally have a BSc, and aren't PhD scientists nor experts, so who cares what they believe.
"2009 comment" and what do you want me to do about it? Only proves any idiot can make moronic posts, and other idiots will quote it.
@ZangaroZen A comment on Joe Romm's Climate Progress blog threatens physical harm to those skeptical of man-made climate fears. The June 5, 2009 comment, posted at 3:01 PM, under the name "Creative Greenius" warns any dissenters from man-made global warming fears that "an entire generation that will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you sleep in your beds." A man named Joe Galliani appears to be the man behind the comments and the Creative Greenius website.
It's not funny, unless you are an EnviroMentalCase.
When I first saw it I had no idea what was coming, and you trying to explain it away like this is LAME.
And how about that Enviro-whacko from your movement that broke into the Discovery Channel last month with a bomb, screaming that the Human Race needed to die in order to save the Earth?
The first of many, I'll bet.
Go pester the Sun for burning so hot, and keep your Nihilistic/Genocidal/Orwellian evilness away from me!
@Sushulana, "Eniro-whacko from your movement", isolated cases are on both sides, only a dishonest person would dream of holding up a rare example as the norm.
"Sun for burning so hot", actually the 11 year Sun cycle is at it's lowest point, and yet this has been the warmest decade on the instrumental record. Scientist tell us it's because of man made CO2.
You don't find this disturbing at all? You really think this is ironic, or funny or... what? I just... man... They're joking right? But then its serious about some global warming project. I know enviro-statists tend to not like descent but... i just don't get it.
@Reckless3057, "enviro-statists tend to not like descent", funny I'm reading your comment no problem. You want censorship? Post factual descent on HTWW channel and he'll delete your comments and block you just as soon as he notices the posts.
@ZangaroZen No one likes to be disagreed with but those who couch their arguments in absolute moral terms like, "those who disagree with me are equivalent to holocaust deniers". Don't like descent. I am not HTWW. I don't care what he does. He's not the issue. the issue is enviro-statism.
@Reckless3057, "no one likes to be disagreed with", sorry most discussions within a free speech forum on youtube are disagreements, very few people just echo agreement as that adds nothing to a discussion.
"those that couch their arguments in absolute moral terms...don't like descent", HTWW to a tee, and I agree with you.
"the issue is enviro-statism", and what specifically?
@ZangaroZen What are you apologizing for? Saying most folks don't like to be disagreed with does not mean people should not disagree.
You missed my point on the rest. It is enviro-statist who couch their arguments in absolute moral terms. Those who do not agree with the science or policies of global warming proponents are in their words ignorant, contrarian, or morally deficient.
This backlash is what people see when they see dissidents to 10/10/10 being blow up.
@Reckless3057, "what are you apologizing for", not apologizing, just stating fact, people generally post when they have something to add and most likely disagree.
"enviro-statist who couch their arguments in absolute moral terms...those who do not agree...ignorant, contrarian, or morally dificient", and would a flat-earther be considered "ignorant, contrarian, or morally dificient"? The point is fact based science trumps BS empty opinions. Agreed?
Of course if you take into account things like the carbon footprint from the manufacturing of the vehicle, the running of it, the effects of the infrastructure needed the effects of petrol deliveries and the infrastructure that requires, it becomes clear that his original statement was cretenous. He had just heard something which already confirmed what he believed and he didn’t question it.
Of course... What could be more funny than watching a teacher kill two students in a gory fashion for not falling in line with a political ideal? Hilarious
Meanwhile, the liberal ninnies shrieked that a pro-life commercial that aired during the super bowl advocated violence against women because during the commercial an NFL star "tackled" his mother, immediately followed by her chiding him for rough housing.
If the shoe were on the other foot, you wouldn't be laughing. Don't pretend otherwise.
@bldgy, thought that Super Bowl commercial was hilarious. Problem was abused women didn't. So all you have to do is find some children that were blown up to complain about the 1010 skits and you'll be set. Until then spread the word far and wide about these 1010 skits and 1010's goal of reduing man made CO2 emmissions by 10% this year. You're going a great job so far, far beyond 1010's wildest dreams of exposure.
@ZangaroZen It had absolutely nothing to do with abused women being offended, and everything to do with the pro-choice people being offended that others could exercise their freedom of speech. Thanks for the intellectual dishonesty, though...
And funny how my commenting on a video you made is spreading the word about man-made CO2. Keep living in your dream world...
@bldgy, you say "had absolutely nothing to do with abused women being offended", so what do you call it when a woman is slammed to the ground? That's the abused woman part reported in the media.
As for "the pro-choice people being offended" by what? That given the choice of an abortion, some women will CHOOSE TO OR NOT. That's what's pro-CHOICE means. A CHOICE.
The above proves your "intellectual dishonesty, though..."
Wake up from your "dream world". I didn't make the video
His apparrant refutation doesnt really hold water if you think about it. Perhaps a joke wouldnt be funny if you changed its context, motivation and subject matter
@reckingmachine lol man, you have no morals or respect for life. if you find blood and gore funny, then i have great pity on you. now your calling people stupid? you lost the battle buddy
@kchomer1, this may come as a surprise to you, no children or adults were harmed during the making of the skits.
You don't find edgy "blood and gore funny", well good for you, now go poll the rest of humanity, or maybe realize that the edgy humor was meant to gain wide exposure, which in part thanks to those like you, has exceeded 1010's wildest expectations. Tell everyone you know, to watch this video, spread 1010's goals, keep it up.
@kchomer1, "dont reply i'll block you" ROTFLMAO, do your worse! Block me, cast a spell, pray against my soul, bring on your empty threats. Think anyone cares?
How sad and pathetic you sound as you run crying from a dialog while offering up a weak threat.
Unlike your delicate sensibilities, I never feel the need to block or censor anyone, however if they act first, I'll return the favor.
In any event blocking only works on your channel, not here or any where else; didn't you know that?
@kchomer1, "if you find blood and gore funny, then i have great pity on you", tip, avoid any "Chucky" movies, or action movies, in fact stick to chick flicks.
No. Look .Rule number 1. You call him crazy, your calling almost everyone else crazy. 2. Money= Power. 3. You should go look at prisonplanet..com and then tell us were crazy. And really? How on earth can you find this funny? They are trying to scare people into forcing them into doing something they want. You know what? What if that was you blowing up? Whos laughing now. Not you.
Never forget the core of the eco-fascist cult demands mindless obedience , and hate your individuality . These nuts will show you the correct behavior, thought processes, attitudes, and beliefs you must have to partake in there green world . . .
They will dictate to you , point at you if you don 't conform . If you eat the none green food they will laugh . They know better than you and you will obey becaue it is nt in the little green book of do's and don'ts . Think hard people
I blame cultural differences for 'Mr. World" literal interpretation. I have to admit I was surprise by the intensity of the humor. But once you understand and read between the lines, it the message becomes quite clear.
CAN I PUSH A BUTTON AND BLOW YOU UP NOW. IS THAT LITERAL ENOUGH FOR YOU. NOW IS THE PROOF FOR GLOBAL WARMING. OH FORGET IT YOUR ALREADY BLOWN UP SO YOU CANT ANSWER. OH WELL AT LEASET THATS ONE LESS IDIOT IN THE WORLD.
@carlsethjen, "CAN I PUSH A BUTTON AND BLOW YOU UP NOW", yes the technology exists, please think of all the people you hate and press that button, in fact LEAN on the button, it will be faster. Have fun. Be sure to keep that button down though as cloning technology is just as fast as recreating everyone you button blow up.
Oh yes, and don't forget to take your meds between button pushing.
HIS video? It's not "his" video, it's a collection of pro-envirofascist advertisements, which made me very confused, because they are made AS IF to portray ALL environmentalists in a bad light. A video making fun of blowing to pieces people who don't adhere to a specific worldview about a lifestyle a bunch of ecofascists approve of? Fuck. I am all in favor of developing better technologies to reduce the use of fossil fuels, but it's not inflammatory to compare them to Nazis.
+You make the mistake of calling it "eco terrorism' when the real meaning is that environmentalists have some very strong totalitarian desires to kill unbelievers,
Eco terrorism???? Can you please show me a site or building where eco terrorists have actually blown something up?? Or someone they have assassinated????
@niceperson709, "environmentalists have some very strong totalitarian desires to kill unbelievers", yeah and they already got button technology to do it! You really should concentrate on finishing that cardboard spaceship, and escaping the planet, before they button you next.
+You make the mistake of calling it "eco terrorism' when the real meaning is that environmentalists have some very strong totalitarian desires to kill unbelievers,
Eco terrorism???? Can you please show me a site or building where eco terrorists have actually blown something up?? Or someone they have assassinated????
The tone of the advert was a bit too serious, the fun humourous intent is probably ment to get their point across, that it is a serious issue to them, if you respond to the people blowing up with "OH MY GAWD, THIS IS DISGRACEFUL" then you are better off questioning why you are getting so angry about it, which leaves the whole advert and debate in your mind longer than usual; WHICH IS THE WHOLE POINT OF AN ADVERT YOU FUCKWITS.
bullshit... saying "no pressure" is not what makes it funny, its what makes it seem like harrasment... you need to read between the lines? oh c'mon mate just because you think you can read between the lines (and totally miss the issue) not everyone can... take a child for example. i dont know what countries this aired in, but any child watching this is clearly going to think, that being for reducing carbon emmisions is the right side of the fence. and therefore carbon taxes are good.. etc..
I imagine this will be shown after 9 pm so kids shouldn’t really see it. I imagine an advert about carbon emissions would be lost on a child anyway, and it is meant to be aimed at adults because they are the ones who take control of there lives. So I couldn’t really give a shit if a kid saw it.
If people cant understand the point of something it isn’t necessarily the adverts fault, it may just be that the watcher is overtly thick.
This was funny only to a few cloistered members of the chattering classes who are so alienated from the real word (and real people) that they've become borderline autistic.
Surely, it must have been obvious that this advert was going to be interpreted as a threat; the Earth isn't going to push buttons and selectively blow up those who don't buy into the green agenda - only eco-terrorists are likely to do that.
Maybe the point they are making is that there is no pressure because people DONT have red buttons they can just push to explode people who don’t chip in. It’s a joke you fuck nut, people are accusing them of being eco terrorists and the point of the video is that they aren’t because no one has these big red buttons.
Show me an eco terrorist bomb site, or someone who has been assassinated by an eco terrorist.
"the point of the video is that they aren’t because no one has these big red buttons"
Do you read what you write? All that tells me that they don't have the means, not that they don't have the desire (which I suspect they do). The means to act and the desire to act are two different things. Considering that these groups have a history of threatening people with violence ( watch?v=BY7875_rv1s ), this is just another kodak moment in the history of the green movement.
@Guncriminal, "All that tells me that they don't have the mans, not that they don't have the desire (which I suspect they do)", so you have ESP too, well good for you.
"these groups have a history of theatening people with violence", only a moron would take rare isolated cases and hold it up as the norm.
The skits' obvious intent was using edgy humor to get wide exposure, and thanks to those like you and others taking things literally, that goal has been far exceed.
"only a moron would take rare isolated cases and hold it up as the norm."
If Greenpeace doesn't speak for "mainstream" environmentalism, then who exactly does?
"that goal has been far exceed"
LOL! It suceeded alright; everyone is saying what psychos they are. Bravo! What do they do for an encore?
Here's a more plausable explanation, taking into account the removal of the video, complete with apology: when the public's response wasn't as they expected, they recanted.
@Guncriminal, "If Greenpeace doesn't speak for "mainstream" environmentalism", OK how many fire bombings, environmental genocides, etc has Greenpeace financed? Name a few with reputable links. Bet you can't back your BS.
"Everyone is saying what psychos they are" that and how psychos can't tell edgy humor and SciFi from reality.
"removal of the vido...apology" yes minor apology and much coverage.
"public's response" the skits were elaborate, likely expected descent and the publicity.
@Guncriminal, "sound of shifting goal posts fill the air", in other words you were called on naming a single greenpeace financed fire bombing, genocide, etc. and couldn't.
"When your audience isn't laughing at the joke", there goes your ESP again, NO YOU'RE not laughing, others did laugh, others didn't laugh, and I thought it was stupid. "adusing the audience for" not thinking like you "isn't going to change that".
"not the sort of dissent and publicity they were expecting" ESP again.
@Guncriminal, "only eco-terrorists are likely to do that [blow up those who don't buy into the green agenda]. And that's precisly what we're seeing here". You must think life is so unfair, after all in your LITERAL mind Arnold Schwarzenegger is a mass murdering robot from the future, that can still be Governor of California.
@Guncriminal, "Fuck you"? Sorry I'm not gay, but good luck finding a boyfriend.
"your quote mining" what quote mining? You don't quote ANYTHING, which is extreme quoting mining on YOUR part. LOL.
"since when does guessing someone's motives...ESP", when you state your BS opinion as fact as in "not that they don't have the desire [to blow kids up]".
"You don't quote ANYTHING, which is extreme quoting mining on YOUR part. LOL."
And how am I quote mining of I'm not quoting anything? That's a good trick. Besides, I accused you of quoting out of context and you start talking about me not quoting anything. Nice red herring.
"when you state your BS opinion as fact as in "not that they don't have the desire [to blow kids up]"."
i realy don't see anything funny about exploding children. i'm sure they could have found a better way to get thier piont across. at least less graffic.
@Cihl280777, Yes, seing the minority of true believer Christians being blow up would be funny, if you don't take it literally like a complete moron. Good point.
When we finish with you you ll wish you had as much rights as a tree . This was a quote from maurice strong and big big player in the eco cult . . . And i can tell you he was nt joking , these creeps at the top want total control of everything you need for life . Your food water , energy on and on . . . . Think very hard people because if you let them have this control you will deserve eveything thats comeing down the pike .
@ozzycriss, "these creeps at the top want total control of everything you need for life. Your food water, energy on and on...let them have this control you will deserve everything thats comeing down the pike", yes aren't corporations evil?
as a film i just couldnt see the funny side, it was over produced and obviously completely lost track of itself during production. the utter lack of soul within this video is why advertising agencies should not do humour. i have no problem with sick or dark comedy but in my opinion i honestly couldnt see how anyone could find it funny.
@aliencrap, "reduce our freedoms over fraudulent science", obviously you want to trade science for the eternal truth in the bible. What could go wrong with returning to the middle ages?
@chevick, didn't see any "green zealots", or global warming hysterics, or any other inflammatory named extremists. But Yes.
The obvious intent, was to gain wide attention through edgy humor. However even though the skits were pulled near immediately from the 1010global(dot)org site, thanks to loud cry-baby detractors (such as yourself) the skits and 1010's goals have attained for more exposure then they could've ever hoped for.
You're doing a great job spreading 1010's message. Keep it up!
I honestly don't get the humor of blowing up whatever opposition you have to your viewpoint. I believe it's rather direct symbolism. They wouldn't be able to put that ad on out here in the USA because it would be ruled as a threat.
As for the message, I firmly believe these people want us to appease them. First, we cut emissions by 10% and that's not satisfying, they want an other 10%, then an other and an other. It never ends, NEVER, because the world will always be ending.
@pooltoo, ironically your name resembles "PooToo" LOL
You say "video is NOT funny" thing is humor is individualistic and various widely. Saying "NOT funny", doesn't prove anything other then a delusion that your personal opinion is a defacto standard that trumps reality.
It takes less than "shit instead of brains" to realize your empty declaration followed by an infantile insult, are both moronic.
As for your comment being the highest rated with 5 thumbs up (socks?), you have company.
@ZangaroZen Apparantely you lead a rather dull life if you find my name amusing, but good for you... Yes, humor can be tricky to grasp, especially for people unable to see the essence of things - relativists.
Joke stops being funny when someone gets seriously hurt or when the intention to hurt is disguised as humor. The ad shows individuals disagreeing with majority opinion being intentionally killed. For me, as one of dissenting, the message is clear - obey, or else... And THAT's NOT funny.
@pooltoo, "my name amusing", the IRONY of you saying "you have shit instead of brains" while naming yourself "pooToo" escapes you.
"Humor can be tricky to grasp, especially for people unable to see the essence", humor is not a mensa brain teaser. AGAIN "humor is individualistic and various widely...your personal opinion is [not] a defacto standard"
"stops being funny when...hurt is disguised as humor" then ignore everyone else's politically incorrect jokes.
If you're having to explain this fucking shite video to everyone it's kinda failed hasn't it, dickhead? Too clever by half for the purpose it was intended for. In fact I'd go so far to say that it comes over as a piss take on the greens, and then the muppets helped promote it. Not very clever after all.
sounds like someone is wearing his grumpy pants today. Perhaps the reason it had to be explained is because the people who dont understand it happen to be idiots.
@marmoset3 , "Not very cleaver after all" got you and thousands like you to talk about it and propagate the 1010 goals of reducing CO2. You've been had, but keep pushing the video.
If that video is comedy then it is of the "Emperor Has no Clothes" variety. In other words, everyone says it is funny because they don't want to admit that they don't get it.
I'll make it simple for you - it wasn't funny.
The environmental movement has a long history of "population control" (i.e. genocide) and this video was simply a masturbatory fantasy for them. If you actually liked it then you are a sick fuck.
@thegoodlocust - You're right. Maurice Strong, among others including international union leaders like Andy Stern and activists like Medea Benjamin have stated the purpose of the Green movement is not to save the world but to institute an international wealth redistribution scheme. Andy Stern and Maurice Strong have both come out in favor of mass murder as a means of population control because overpopulation is supposedly such a huge problem.
@Slipknotyk06, "wealth redistribution", how aweful, taxing people what they can afford while effecting the less numbers. How about we exchange "wealth redistribution" for "war death redistribution" and "exploitation redistribution". Funny now the rich rarely put their necks out in the wars to defend their country or do the back breaking work that made them rich.
@ZangaroZen - First, screw your theories of exploitation. It's been proven throughout Asia and in India that Capitalism enriches the people. Also, that back breaking work common in developing countries is stuff those people would rather do than live on subsistence agriculture and wait for the next plague or famine to kill them! It's not equality of outcome that matters, it's equality of opportunity. Not everyone can act like John Travolta but everyone can try out!
@Slipknotyk06, "proven throughout Asia...India...Capitalism enriches the people", funny how India and Asia had capitalism for a hundred years and it's only kicking in now. Why is that? Anything to do with exporting western jobs, globalization?
"back breaking work...stuff those people would rather do than live on subsistence agriculture", no one likes breaking their back, when did ever work that hard? You don't speak for indentured peoples.
@ZangaroZen - Many Asian economies didn't open up until the 80s, and were hostile to outside interests with import quotas and tariff walls.
These people aren't indentured. They have a choice, a better life through difficult work or subsistence agriculture waiting for the next disaster to end their lives. I've worked hard and don't EVER doubt that. You don't know me, so don't make assumptions.
@Slipknotyk06, "Many Asian economies didn't open up until the 80s", obviously we weren't talking about the strictly communistic ones.
"people aren't indentured", you have no any idea third world hires. Think paid off middle men, multi-year commitments, etc.
"Equality of Opportunity exists. Prove me wrong" take your Travolta example, do YOU have an equal acting opportunity against him? No. Opportunity does not equal equality. Buying a lottery ticket does make you a millionaire.
@ZangaroZen - China actually started opening up in the 80s, about 5-10 years after the death of Chairman Mao and guess what happened? Starvation stopped practically overnight.
The people of the third world would rather work in industry than subsistence agriculture, and have benefited greatly. Check out Absolute Poverty figures in India.
Equality of opportunity does exist. I can try out, and if I've worked on my acting and put in the EFFORT, I might just get the role.
@Slipknotyk06, you proclaim "opening up in the 80s...Starvation stopped practically overnight". The last Chinese famine was 1958-61 as caused by Mao confiscating harvests to finance industrialization (trade lives for industrial growth). Your "over night" is actually 20 years. You pwn yourself.
"people of the third world would rather work in industry", where's the reputable poll?
"Poverty figures in India" credit globalization/job shifts.
@ZangaroZen - Starvation was still going on inside China into the 80s, as food production lagged behind population growth.
There is no poll, but there is the increased rate of urbanization among developing nations.
Why did those jobs move to India? Could it be because of decreased business regulations?
The chances would be 50/50 assuming equal skills. That's the way it should be; a highschool cheerleader lacks the skills to be a doctor, but is fine as a waitress..
@thegoodlocust, "I'll make it simpel for you - it wasn't funny", any more personal opinions you'd like to declare as universal law?
"The environmental movement has a long history of "population control" (ie genocide) and thsi video was simply a a masturbatory fantasy", LOL name some non-war non-crazy dictator "environmental genocides". Just one or admit you're spouting crazy nonsense.
That was supposed to be FUNNY?????? Talk about your PR own goal...I don't see ANYTHING funny in that advertisement. That film is entirely INDEFENSIBLE, my fine fellow. If you can't see that, there are no words in the English language to describe how sick you are.
smartalek65 2 weeks ago
HTWW is such a tool :P
HomoCyborgZombie 11 months ago
Do we want to take the risk of following your bs? The risk of doing something about our innefficient technologies is less than doing nothing if we get it right it can save lots in the long run. Money, air pollution, etc.
luc59457 1 year ago
Most of these video responses to howtheworldworks sucks, just like how howtheworldworks sucks
luc59457 1 year ago
I want to take a hammer and smash your teeth out because it think it is fucking hilarious, don't you? And, the message would serve to teach everyone to lower "carbon emissions" by making this sociopath dolt in the video unable to consume more than he needs to stay alive and continue being a debt slave to the bankers and corporations that fund the AGW hoax for their new money making scheme. HILARIOUS!
biped19 1 year ago
That commercial is very disturbed. I didn't watch it hoping to dislike it. I watched it and felt very disturbed seeing children who had a valid disagreement with their teacher being blown up. The kids were not "dickheads". They simply didn't want to participate in something which they disagreed with.
DarthMaul8065 1 year ago
As easy as it would be to just call you stupid and be satisfied with myself, I am inclined to educate you first. There is no such thing as environazis, they are not an evil cult, it’s not a scare tactic it is humour, Granted quite shocking humour. But this advert was pulled.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
The group haven’t used this advert for AGES. How the world works did his video about this add AFTER IT WAS PULLED. And he knew this. It’s on one of his own links that he put on that video, its not the first time he has put up a link to support his view only for it to be incorrect or a blatant lie.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
I know what you are trying to say but some or a lot of children that watch this don't understand some kind of humor and not all people find that funny. I can honestly say I don't find it funny because I don't have that humor. At its core it is just a bit sick to think that 5 to 8 year olds watch this video, and see people being napalmed. I am though one of the people that has actually studies thermodynamics and physics properly and there is more evidence against the green theory than for it.
Halofanbiggest 1 year ago
potato
daviddevall 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@callingheyzeus, wishful video, but only pure research with no practical cost effective implementation. Can't rely on what might be, must make do with what is.
"I see your point", no you missed it. Again, the "Green Police" ad seems to be saying ecofascists want to outlaw:
1. plastics
2. battery garbage
3. incandescent bulbs
4. water bottles
5. hot water
and those that don't comply will be arrested and jailed.
Is that an ACCURATE ad "fanatical and demented" message?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, good video, thanks. Was pursuing becoming an architect, so I have an appreciation for this type of thing.
"basically they are saying not driving their car is like a criminal act...fanatical and demented about it", how about, ecofascists want to outlaw
1. plastics
2. battery garbage
3. incandescent bulbs
4. water bottles
5. hot water
and if people don't comply they should be arrested and thrown in jail.
Is that an accurate "fanatical and demented" message?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, it's only fair to let your opponent know when a game is in progress and they're suppose to be playing.
Time to move on, now that the name-that-famous-quote game is over
Watch this video zVhT7P0lDfI
What's the message?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, (con't) you didn't catch Mark Twain's famour quotes? How so? I put it in quotes and used "...", not familiar with it?
"Never let [your] schooling, get in the way of [your] education"- Mark Twain
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, watch the 1933 video YlLZE23EJKs and compare that to modern day ubiquitous mini-vans, 5th wheels, RVs. Still think the Dymaxion car (many ideas lifted from a 1929 Zaschka car) didn't go any where? Compare that to your nearest geodesic dome.
"the domes did [take off]" sorry domes and the strength of a triangle have been around in architecture for milleniums. Fuller's innovation was a cheap/modular unhidden support structure.
Watch zVhT7P0lDfI what's the message?
(con't)
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
(con't) see my other reply posted minutes earlier
"synergetics-systems where the whole is greater than the sum of the parts", this concept is as old as man, as soon as you build anything this is true. The obvious example is a car.
"in other words systems of doing more with less", no that's efficiency.
Synergetics is a broad term for creating new properties by combining things with different properties.
Watch zVhT7P0lDfI what is the message?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
Comment removed
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, "wastes your time and it annoys the pig", you omitted half of this famous quote, the famous half, as well as omitted the quotes marks thus representing the words as your own. Both less then honest. "Never let [your] schooling get in the way..."
"Saying in the 1960's", way before my time, you're old.
"except Bucky Fuller", sorry never heard that one.
Fuller doesn't compare to DaVinci's broader range. Fuller's peak in my opinion was the Dymaxion car not the Geodesic dome
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, you've made the following hollow proclamations:
1. "walking can produce as much as 4 times the Carbon emissions as driving"
2. "producing 1 liter of milk is equivalent to burning 1 liter of petrol"
3. "takes the energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gas to produce 1 gallon of gas"
etc
All of which defy trivial logic and reputable reference links.
Now you suggestion the solution to being in "deep trouble", is "Pigs will have to learn how to sing". Go luck with that. Bye bye
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
The Global Warming debate is controversial to begin with, seeing as some leaders in its movement are somewhat hypocritical. But when is making someone who disagrees with you explode "funny"?
Would killing everyone against the mosque at ground zero be funny?'
Would killing everyone "pro mother's-choice" be funny.(mother's-choice because the baby has none)
Would killing everyone against your least favorite world dictator be funny?
Some people actually see this sick "humor" as a threat.
handheldgamer144 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, "exactly the opposite", so tell me in constant dollar terms and per acres terms are crops and profits:
1. increasing
OR
2. decreasing
"we are in deep trouble" and your solution is?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, "burned out on looking", as I see it things are trivial and self-evident:
1. human walking is a 100s of 1000s of years sustainable activity that takes less calories then to mine, manufacture, fuel, and provide infrastructure for a 4000lb car
2. over time manufacturing/farming becomes MORE efficient not less as you claim
3. CO2 concentrations are rising fast in lock step with man made CO2 increases, not population growth.
Any questions?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, "problem of sustainability...changes in farming practices...fertilizers...feed livestock corn and grain...maximize production...irrigation...pesticides...herbicides...about 33% of our oil use" and your point is we are running out of oil and can't sustain the 33% required? If so go green technology.
The above dances around the fact that modern techniques increase efficiency more than enough to offsets the added cost, ie big net gain.
Your sustainability point on all this?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, AGAIN you didn't answer any of my questions. Scared the answers will prove my point?
"Got some more numbers...1940...2.3 calories of food energy for very calorie of fossil energy...by 1974 1:1...today...10:1...In the 1940s...100 barrels of oil back for every barrel of oil we spent getting it...Today...ten", where's the link?
If the above is true, then food production is 94% LESS efficient, and oil production 90% LESS efficient then in 1940. Negative improvement. Smell BS.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, "spent 8 hours looking for the answer to your questions", after all that you can only offer vagueness which in turn throws all your declared factoids out the window
AGAIN, repeat question "Earth's population is relatively stable, and yet CO2 output is increasing exponentially. Not bodies, but what then?"
You complain about humans walking, milk production, cows grazing, etc, all sustainable for 100s of 1000s years, yet THOSE ARE PROBLEMS and FOSSIL FUELS AREN'T. How so?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, "found one number that suggested it takes the energy equivalent of 1 gallon of gas to produce 1 gallon of gas", do you believe any nonsense that tends to support your bias? Trivial logic in trivial time will address this "factoid". If a gallon produced is off set by a gallon in production, then the net gain is ALWAYS zero. Obviously your "factoid" is BS without a link.
"Do we...?" first be a good sport and answer the previous 3 questions in my previous post.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, how many times are you going to ignore my question about comparison fairness?
Is comparing 1L of milk and ALL its related background costs to 1L of petrol with NONE of its related background costs honest or not?
Next how about adding in all the 1000s of people "walking" etc to product a car, oil, petrol, etc, etc, and now compare that to the 1L. Well?
Earth's population is relatively stable, and yet CO2 output is increasing exponentially. Not bodies, but what then?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
At the Live Earth Concert at Giants Stadium, one of the non musical acts, Robert Kennedy Jr., shouted himself hoarse. He called those people who doubt either that global warming exists or that it is man-made or that it matters traitors and that they should be dealt with as such.
nadeau 1 year ago
And of course, David GInola, great French footballer, love the guy. Im very into soccer (football, I live in America, I dont call it soccer by choice, just throwing that out there) and Im sure that Tottenham Hotspur arent eco-terrorists, Giovani dos Santos played for them (Im half Mexican). And I dont think that HTWW ever thought of it in literal terms either. Hes not stupid, no one is that stupid to suggest that these people are actually dying. Its a bit of s trawman your doing just saying.
GermanConquistador08 1 year ago
Funny? I imagine you think it's funny when John McCain sings "Bomb, Bomb Iran" or jokes about IED's, or Bush joking bout WMD's.
arikkonn 1 year ago
@arikkonn, "Bomb, Bomb Iran" or "IEDs" or "Bush on fake WMD", doesn't compare to CGI deaths. The first batch of commetns have real and dealy consequences while CGI doesn't, even if you take CGI and edgy humor literally.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
Ok are you serious man? "Two dickheads" You mean two CHILDREN who maybe just didnt want to hear the teacher, wanting to go home? Maybe the children werent politically motivated, no child is. Theres no way the video was hinting that the two kids were against 10:10 SOLELY because they disagree with it. Its not funny in the least bit. THe saying "No pressure" then killing them, tthats not funny, thats cruel. Its simply not funny.
GermanConquistador08 1 year ago
OMG, you are SO right..the FUNNY side.. thats prolly why i was lmao at movies like SCANNERS and BODY SNATCHERS or other movies like that where they had scenes of ppl exploding while everyone else was screaming ... yeah, ppl need to loosen and laugh some more ...
IDIOT
bolatluver29 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, the point you dance around is comparing the total TRACED BACK cost of 1L of milk to burning 1L of petrol WITHOUT ANY TRACE BACK costs. QUESTION: Is that comparison grossly misleading or not?
The commonality is "humans walking", and how one human walking off 1L of milk (and it's traced back costs) compares to the 1000s of humans walking required to mine, manufacture, transport, etc. a car, oil, petrol while "you are sleeping".
Cars are far more addicted to oil.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, "producing 1 liter of milk is equivalent to burning 1 liter of petrol...1 liter=2kg CO2 for a car". Comparing an apple to pumpkin seed, instead of a giant punpkin?
1L milk is traced back to the ACCUMULATION of transportation, cow, its food, etc. and then compared to "burning 1 liter of petrol" WITH NO TRACE BACK.
That 1 liter of petrol had to be found, drilled, transported around half the world, stored, sold, and used in a car with an even bigger footprint. Clear?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
How can you try to take the moral high ground whilst being racist???
reckingmachine 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, "my [one] source..."How to Live A Low-Carbon Life", does indeed claim on page 151 "walking 1.5 miles would generate...2kg of global warming gases, 4 or 5 times the amount...from driving". As the author considers the 140 calories requierd as TRACED BACK TO ROOT FOOD PRODUCTION versus gas burnt with NO TRACE BACK. Now add in all those calorie burning humans working hard (not on a Sunday afternoon stroll) to produce the car/oil/gas/roads/etc and get back to me.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@Hotrodrogers91, "an idiot for thinking I did" no only an idiot would think I was serious about you being an idiot.
"don't understand my humor...how in the crap could I double my emissions", oh I got your humor, in contrast to you completely missing the 1010 humor. While you were bent out of shape spouting outraged over the 1010 skits, I called you on your comment, and you admitted it was BS humor. Had you called out 1010 they'd have done the same, admit it was BS humor. "use your brain"
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@Hotrodrogers91, "swearing makes you look dumber", and what swear words were used exactly? You don't say. Weren't any?
"Nobody should ever kid about blowing people up. Even in satire" is that is, or do you have other personal decrees a free society and speech must adhere to? Or what execatly? You'd press a red button and blow them up? LOL.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@Cnservative0rbust, "HTWW's comment on-screen... replace with an abortion issue THEN see who's laughing", obviously HTWW doesn't see the difference between edgy humor of a button being pressed with no actual consequences, and that of actual abortion procedure. A room full of babies with those being actually aborted blowing up (real implied deaths), is a far cry from the edgy humor in the video.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@Hotrodrogers91, "killing children", talk about "look dumber". No children or adults were harmed in the skits, and before you ask, no Arnold Schwarzenegger, Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, etc, etc are not mass murderers.
"I am going to double my emissions", well at least you have goals, lets us know when you've paid off your doubled fuel bill.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@callingheyzeus, "walking can produce as much as 4 times the Carbon emissions as driving...Who's laughing with me now", LOL I'm laughing at you and your nonsense opinion.
How about you:
1. provide a reputable link proving this "factoid"
2. explain how atmospheric CO2 content rises with fossil fuel burning not the population.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@bulabula1, thing is humor is individualistic and various widely. Saying "NOTHING funny", doesn't prove anything other then a delusion that your personal opinion is a defacto standard that trumps reality.
The obvious intent, was to gain wide attention through edgy humor. However even though the skits were pulled near immediately from the 1010global(dot)org site, thanks to loud cry-baby detractors (such as yourself) the skits and 1010's goals have attained for more exposure. Keep it up.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
Comment removed
MyOwnYTAccount 1 year ago
@MyOwnYTAccount, "murdering children" you do realize that science is very from a button that can direct 5lbs of TNT limited to a child's body? Edgy humor obviously not meant to be taking LITERALLY by anyone, but obviously that reality flew over the head of some.
Then again why don't you forward this undeserving video to everyone you know, and spread 1010's goals of 10% CO2 reducation during 2010. The more exposure the better, and the right wing wingnuts have been doing a great job.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
Comment removed
MyOwnYTAccount 1 year ago
Comment removed
MyOwnYTAccount 1 year ago
@MyOwnYTAccount, "the technology to buid for remotely detonated shaped charges is actually very easy to improvise", well I've been pressing a button over here and it you respond that will prove that the 5lbs of TNT supposedly in your watch didn't go off, let alone the force field restricting the blast to your body.
Are you done claiming science fiction is science fact?
"suffering so many casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan", IEDs are a far cry from the Sci-Fi you claim is already here.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
Comment removed
MyOwnYTAccount 1 year ago
Hey fatass. Lay off the Toblerones and pork pies. It wasn't funny.
revelinabandon 1 year ago
@revelinabandon, "It wasn't funny", well good for you, glad you shared your personal opinion, now poll the rest of humanity, or better yet, go tell everyone you know about this video. Spread 1010's goals of reducing carbon emmissions by 10% this year, 1010 couldn't have dreamed of a wider exposure then what the right has already given it.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen Hate to break it to you, but no one cares. Global warming has been delegitimized by the introduction of profiteering. It's a scam, and nobody believes the scientists because they don't trust their employers' motives. It doesn't matter how much attention this gets. It's going to turn more people off than on. Poll the rest of humanity itself. You'll find most don't care to follow shrill zealots that would have them bottling their farts.
revelinabandon 1 year ago
@revelinabandon, "no one cares", really? funny how Annie Leonard's videos got 10 million views in one year, and spawned other videos and a book. Maybe YOU don't care, then again you did comment.
"delegitimized by...profiteering", filling a need, is part of capitalism, which apparently you dispise as well.
"nobody believes the scientists" if YOU feel that strongly, then eat only junk food, have unprotected sex, never see a doctor, etc.
"bottling...farts" you pwn yourself that nonsense.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen Since you want to play semantics I'll speak in absolutes. Many fewer people care much about this issue than you would like.
I don't despise capitalism. I despise paying something for nothing, especially when that nothing is government sponsored and mandatory. Any kind of carbon emissions tax is going to be opposed and defeated.
I don't trust most global warming scientists you twit, not all scientists.
Bottling farts is hyperbole. As a leftist you should be familiar with that.
revelinabandon 1 year ago
@revelinabandon, "many fewer people care much about this issue than you would like", how "many fewer"? "you would like" how many? That's 2 questions.
"paying something for nothing", a clean sustainable environment isn't nothing, and it's cheaper to act now then later "you twit".
"that nothing is government sponsored and mandatory" so don't thank a vet like normal people, spit on them instead.
"I don't trust most global warming scientists, not all scientists" you trust quacks. Like who?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen You're ridiculous. I don't do numbers on this stuff. That's someone else's job. I'll assume you want everyone to care like you do, and I'm confident most do not. When the zealots get so shrill they have to blow up childrens heads and splatter everyone with gore for attention, it's clear they are desperate for an audience. My environment is clean and sustainable now. I'm not buying some false product. Thank a vet? Apples and oranges. The quacks are the progressives. Fuck em and fuck u
revelinabandon 1 year ago
@revelinabandon, "You're ridiculous", apparently so is calling you out to back your empty nonsense opinions with facts.
"I don't do numbers on this stuff" agreed you only make up BS; reread the above sentence.
"I'll asume you want everyone to care like you do", WRONG, do hope experts in the know are the basis for those in power making the right decisions. What Monckton-like quacks do is irrelevant.
"desperate for an audience" and got a world wide one.
"fuck u"? you're not my type
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen Then fuck yourself. Everything I'm saying common sense. It doesn't matter if these kooks got a world wide audience. The general consensus is they got a bad review, which will furthur turn people away. So good for them. Dickheads like you can only do the job piecemeal.
Encouraging people to reduce pollution, conserve and increase cleaner, renewable sources is fine because it's the right thing to do. Ramming it down their throats by falsifying a global scare is not.
revelinabandon 1 year ago
@revelinabandon, have to cry empty obscenities and insults? Then you've lost the arguement. Who said "fuck yourself...dickheads like you", YOU did
"Everything I'm saying common sense", and mindless followers hang on your every pronouncement. I prefer facts, and you've offered none
"consensus is they got a bad review" you conveniently left out from zero to world wide 1010 campaign exposure
"falsifying a gobal scare" another baseless declaration. Facts?
Green Police ad, prove anything?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
If you think this is funny you are a sick human being. Some of us don't think it's funny to blow up children or anyone else who disagrees with you. Many man-mad global warming alarmists have said that those who disagree with their nonsense should be jailed or killed. That's the people you associate with.
nadeau 1 year ago 2
@nadeau, this may come as a surprise to you but no "children or anyone else" were harmed in the production of the skits.
"Many man-mad global warming alarmists have said that those who disagree with their nonsense should be jailed or killed", how much is many? More than ZERO?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen You're not very bright are you? Unlike most environmentalists I can tell the difference between fantasy and reality.
E. Ralph Hostetter
The global warming debate within certain minority groups of the far left has become confrontational. Now circulating is such shocking language as, "At what point do we jail or execute global warming deniers? Shouldn't we start punishing them now?" These words came from Talking Point Memo, an agenda-setting website of the far left.
nadeau 1 year ago
@nadeau, "You're not very bright are you?...I can tell the difference between fantasy and reality...execute global warming deniers...words came from...website of the far left", so what's your point? That anyone can find any nonsense opinion on the internet? Don't have to be very bright to know that. Got to be incredibly stupid to think you can and pass off internet nonsense as mainstream fact.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen In 2006, the eco-magazine Grist called for Nuremberg-Style trials for skeptics. In 2008, Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki called for government leaders skeptical of global warming to be thrown “into jail.” In 2007, The Weather Channel's climate expert called for withholding certification of skeptical meteorologists.
nadeau 1 year ago
@nadeau, "Nurembery-style trials...thrown into jail...withholding certification of skeptical meteorologists", and this proves what? That people say all sorts of things during idle talk and don't act on any of it? Not worth a moment's gossip
As for meteorologist, they generally have a BSc, and aren't PhD scientists nor experts, so who cares what they believe.
"2009 comment" and what do you want me to do about it? Only proves any idiot can make moronic posts, and other idiots will quote it.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen A comment on Joe Romm's Climate Progress blog threatens physical harm to those skeptical of man-made climate fears. The June 5, 2009 comment, posted at 3:01 PM, under the name "Creative Greenius" warns any dissenters from man-made global warming fears that "an entire generation that will soon be ready to strangle you and your kind while you sleep in your beds." A man named Joe Galliani appears to be the man behind the comments and the Creative Greenius website.
nadeau 1 year ago
Comment removed
nadeau 1 year ago
It's not funny, unless you are an EnviroMentalCase.
When I first saw it I had no idea what was coming, and you trying to explain it away like this is LAME.
And how about that Enviro-whacko from your movement that broke into the Discovery Channel last month with a bomb, screaming that the Human Race needed to die in order to save the Earth?
The first of many, I'll bet.
Go pester the Sun for burning so hot, and keep your Nihilistic/Genocidal/Orwellian evilness away from me!
Sushulana 1 year ago
@Sushulana, "Eniro-whacko from your movement", isolated cases are on both sides, only a dishonest person would dream of holding up a rare example as the norm.
"Sun for burning so hot", actually the 11 year Sun cycle is at it's lowest point, and yet this has been the warmest decade on the instrumental record. Scientist tell us it's because of man made CO2.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
You don't find this disturbing at all? You really think this is ironic, or funny or... what? I just... man... They're joking right? But then its serious about some global warming project. I know enviro-statists tend to not like descent but... i just don't get it.
Reckless3057 1 year ago
@Reckless3057, "enviro-statists tend to not like descent", funny I'm reading your comment no problem. You want censorship? Post factual descent on HTWW channel and he'll delete your comments and block you just as soon as he notices the posts.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen No one likes to be disagreed with but those who couch their arguments in absolute moral terms like, "those who disagree with me are equivalent to holocaust deniers". Don't like descent. I am not HTWW. I don't care what he does. He's not the issue. the issue is enviro-statism.
Reckless3057 1 year ago
@Reckless3057, "no one likes to be disagreed with", sorry most discussions within a free speech forum on youtube are disagreements, very few people just echo agreement as that adds nothing to a discussion.
"those that couch their arguments in absolute moral terms...don't like descent", HTWW to a tee, and I agree with you.
"the issue is enviro-statism", and what specifically?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen What are you apologizing for? Saying most folks don't like to be disagreed with does not mean people should not disagree.
You missed my point on the rest. It is enviro-statist who couch their arguments in absolute moral terms. Those who do not agree with the science or policies of global warming proponents are in their words ignorant, contrarian, or morally deficient.
This backlash is what people see when they see dissidents to 10/10/10 being blow up.
Reckless3057 1 year ago
@Reckless3057, "what are you apologizing for", not apologizing, just stating fact, people generally post when they have something to add and most likely disagree.
"enviro-statist who couch their arguments in absolute moral terms...those who do not agree...ignorant, contrarian, or morally dificient", and would a flat-earther be considered "ignorant, contrarian, or morally dificient"? The point is fact based science trumps BS empty opinions. Agreed?
"backlash" to what edgy fictional humor?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
Of course if you take into account things like the carbon footprint from the manufacturing of the vehicle, the running of it, the effects of the infrastructure needed the effects of petrol deliveries and the infrastructure that requires, it becomes clear that his original statement was cretenous. He had just heard something which already confirmed what he believed and he didn’t question it.
This is because he is stupid.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
Although there is a huge carbon footprint from the meat trade and perhaps it is time for us to go veggie.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
@reckingmachine screw that bs
kchomer1 1 year ago
@reckingmachine, "This is because he is stupid", I disagree, stupid is much to mild a term. Pin-head Imbecilic is more accurate.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
Of course... What could be more funny than watching a teacher kill two students in a gory fashion for not falling in line with a political ideal? Hilarious
Meanwhile, the liberal ninnies shrieked that a pro-life commercial that aired during the super bowl advocated violence against women because during the commercial an NFL star "tackled" his mother, immediately followed by her chiding him for rough housing.
If the shoe were on the other foot, you wouldn't be laughing. Don't pretend otherwise.
bldgy 1 year ago
@bldgy, thought that Super Bowl commercial was hilarious. Problem was abused women didn't. So all you have to do is find some children that were blown up to complain about the 1010 skits and you'll be set. Until then spread the word far and wide about these 1010 skits and 1010's goal of reduing man made CO2 emmissions by 10% this year. You're going a great job so far, far beyond 1010's wildest dreams of exposure.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen It had absolutely nothing to do with abused women being offended, and everything to do with the pro-choice people being offended that others could exercise their freedom of speech. Thanks for the intellectual dishonesty, though...
And funny how my commenting on a video you made is spreading the word about man-made CO2. Keep living in your dream world...
bldgy 1 year ago
@bldgy, you say "had absolutely nothing to do with abused women being offended", so what do you call it when a woman is slammed to the ground? That's the abused woman part reported in the media.
As for "the pro-choice people being offended" by what? That given the choice of an abortion, some women will CHOOSE TO OR NOT. That's what's pro-CHOICE means. A CHOICE.
The above proves your "intellectual dishonesty, though..."
Wake up from your "dream world". I didn't make the video
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
I'm laughing at you, so that will have to do.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
His apparrant refutation doesnt really hold water if you think about it. Perhaps a joke wouldnt be funny if you changed its context, motivation and subject matter
reckingmachine 1 year ago
ya you are a bastard
kchomer1 1 year ago
how is see load sof blood and gore thrown against other people funny? it cheapens life.
kchomer1 1 year ago
Your anglish not gode
reckingmachine 1 year ago
@reckingmachine your sensitivity to the handicap isn't gode!
kchomer1 1 year ago
If you are even handicapped, four things.
I had assumed from what you said that you where just a stupid person.
If you are handicapped you have more worries then some stupid advert.
How the fuck was I supposed to know???
Should I just assume retard???
Actually…..
reckingmachine 1 year ago
@reckingmachine lol man, you have no morals or respect for life. if you find blood and gore funny, then i have great pity on you. now your calling people stupid? you lost the battle buddy
kchomer1 1 year ago
@kchomer1, this may come as a surprise to you, no children or adults were harmed during the making of the skits.
You don't find edgy "blood and gore funny", well good for you, now go poll the rest of humanity, or maybe realize that the edgy humor was meant to gain wide exposure, which in part thanks to those like you, has exceeded 1010's wildest expectations. Tell everyone you know, to watch this video, spread 1010's goals, keep it up.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen sure when you pay attention to what i say. dont reply i`ll block you
kchomer1 1 year ago
@kchomer1, "dont reply i'll block you" ROTFLMAO, do your worse! Block me, cast a spell, pray against my soul, bring on your empty threats. Think anyone cares?
How sad and pathetic you sound as you run crying from a dialog while offering up a weak threat.
Unlike your delicate sensibilities, I never feel the need to block or censor anyone, however if they act first, I'll return the favor.
In any event blocking only works on your channel, not here or any where else; didn't you know that?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@kchomer1, "if you find blood and gore funny, then i have great pity on you", tip, avoid any "Chucky" movies, or action movies, in fact stick to chick flicks.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@kchomer1, "blood and gore thrown against other people funny?", so restrict yourself to chick flicks.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
No. Look .Rule number 1. You call him crazy, your calling almost everyone else crazy. 2. Money= Power. 3. You should go look at prisonplanet..com and then tell us were crazy. And really? How on earth can you find this funny? They are trying to scare people into forcing them into doing something they want. You know what? What if that was you blowing up? Whos laughing now. Not you.
TheXD8D 1 year ago
Never forget the core of the eco-fascist cult demands mindless obedience , and hate your individuality . These nuts will show you the correct behavior, thought processes, attitudes, and beliefs you must have to partake in there green world . . .
They will dictate to you , point at you if you don 't conform . If you eat the none green food they will laugh . They know better than you and you will obey becaue it is nt in the little green book of do's and don'ts . Think hard people
ozzycriss 1 year ago
rubbish response
Jandevries82 1 year ago
I blame cultural differences for 'Mr. World" literal interpretation. I have to admit I was surprise by the intensity of the humor. But once you understand and read between the lines, it the message becomes quite clear.
lafther210 1 year ago
CAN I PUSH A BUTTON AND BLOW YOU UP NOW. IS THAT LITERAL ENOUGH FOR YOU. NOW IS THE PROOF FOR GLOBAL WARMING. OH FORGET IT YOUR ALREADY BLOWN UP SO YOU CANT ANSWER. OH WELL AT LEASET THATS ONE LESS IDIOT IN THE WORLD.
carlsethjen 1 year ago
WRIGHTING IN CAPS MAKES THINGS MORE CLEAR AND CORRECT.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
@carlsethjen, "CAN I PUSH A BUTTON AND BLOW YOU UP NOW", yes the technology exists, please think of all the people you hate and press that button, in fact LEAN on the button, it will be faster. Have fun. Be sure to keep that button down though as cloning technology is just as fast as recreating everyone you button blow up.
Oh yes, and don't forget to take your meds between button pushing.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
"His gay video... "
HIS video? It's not "his" video, it's a collection of pro-envirofascist advertisements, which made me very confused, because they are made AS IF to portray ALL environmentalists in a bad light. A video making fun of blowing to pieces people who don't adhere to a specific worldview about a lifestyle a bunch of ecofascists approve of? Fuck. I am all in favor of developing better technologies to reduce the use of fossil fuels, but it's not inflammatory to compare them to Nazis.
Akatam0t0ma 1 year ago
+You make the mistake of calling it "eco terrorism' when the real meaning is that environmentalists have some very strong totalitarian desires to kill unbelievers,
niceperson709 1 year ago
Eco terrorism???? Can you please show me a site or building where eco terrorists have actually blown something up?? Or someone they have assassinated????
Grow up.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
@niceperson709, "environmentalists have some very strong totalitarian desires to kill unbelievers", yeah and they already got button technology to do it! You really should concentrate on finishing that cardboard spaceship, and escaping the planet, before they button you next.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
+You make the mistake of calling it "eco terrorism' when the real meaning is that environmentalists have some very strong totalitarian desires to kill unbelievers,
niceperson709 1 year ago
Eco terrorism???? Can you please show me a site or building where eco terrorists have actually blown something up?? Or someone they have assassinated????
Grow up.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
The tone of the advert was a bit too serious, the fun humourous intent is probably ment to get their point across, that it is a serious issue to them, if you respond to the people blowing up with "OH MY GAWD, THIS IS DISGRACEFUL" then you are better off questioning why you are getting so angry about it, which leaves the whole advert and debate in your mind longer than usual; WHICH IS THE WHOLE POINT OF AN ADVERT YOU FUCKWITS.
atombat 1 year ago
Obviously some people are taking our british dark sense of humour far too seriously, this is the signal ,....plan X has been initiated.
atombat 1 year ago
bullshit... saying "no pressure" is not what makes it funny, its what makes it seem like harrasment... you need to read between the lines? oh c'mon mate just because you think you can read between the lines (and totally miss the issue) not everyone can... take a child for example. i dont know what countries this aired in, but any child watching this is clearly going to think, that being for reducing carbon emmisions is the right side of the fence. and therefore carbon taxes are good.. etc..
MCDouga11 1 year ago
I imagine this will be shown after 9 pm so kids shouldn’t really see it. I imagine an advert about carbon emissions would be lost on a child anyway, and it is meant to be aimed at adults because they are the ones who take control of there lives. So I couldn’t really give a shit if a kid saw it.
If people cant understand the point of something it isn’t necessarily the adverts fault, it may just be that the watcher is overtly thick.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
Don't hurt your brain.
dwegner 1 year ago
This was funny only to a few cloistered members of the chattering classes who are so alienated from the real word (and real people) that they've become borderline autistic.
Surely, it must have been obvious that this advert was going to be interpreted as a threat; the Earth isn't going to push buttons and selectively blow up those who don't buy into the green agenda - only eco-terrorists are likely to do that.
And that's precisely what we're seeing here.
Guncriminal 1 year ago 3
Maybe the point they are making is that there is no pressure because people DONT have red buttons they can just push to explode people who don’t chip in. It’s a joke you fuck nut, people are accusing them of being eco terrorists and the point of the video is that they aren’t because no one has these big red buttons.
Show me an eco terrorist bomb site, or someone who has been assassinated by an eco terrorist.
Grow up.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
@reckingmachine
"the point of the video is that they aren’t because no one has these big red buttons"
Do you read what you write? All that tells me that they don't have the means, not that they don't have the desire (which I suspect they do). The means to act and the desire to act are two different things. Considering that these groups have a history of threatening people with violence ( watch?v=BY7875_rv1s ), this is just another kodak moment in the history of the green movement.
Guncriminal 1 year ago
@Guncriminal, "All that tells me that they don't have the mans, not that they don't have the desire (which I suspect they do)", so you have ESP too, well good for you.
"these groups have a history of theatening people with violence", only a moron would take rare isolated cases and hold it up as the norm.
The skits' obvious intent was using edgy humor to get wide exposure, and thanks to those like you and others taking things literally, that goal has been far exceed.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen
"only a moron would take rare isolated cases and hold it up as the norm."
If Greenpeace doesn't speak for "mainstream" environmentalism, then who exactly does?
"that goal has been far exceed"
LOL! It suceeded alright; everyone is saying what psychos they are. Bravo! What do they do for an encore?
Here's a more plausable explanation, taking into account the removal of the video, complete with apology: when the public's response wasn't as they expected, they recanted.
Guncriminal 1 year ago
@Guncriminal, "If Greenpeace doesn't speak for "mainstream" environmentalism", OK how many fire bombings, environmental genocides, etc has Greenpeace financed? Name a few with reputable links. Bet you can't back your BS.
"Everyone is saying what psychos they are" that and how psychos can't tell edgy humor and SciFi from reality.
"removal of the vido...apology" yes minor apology and much coverage.
"public's response" the skits were elaborate, likely expected descent and the publicity.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen
"OK how many fire bombings etc."
The sound of shifting goalposts fills then air.
"psychos can't tell edgy humor and SciFi from reality."
When your audience isn't lauging at the joke, it's not edgy humour, it's edgy fail. Abusing the audience for not laughing isn't going to change that.
"expected descent and the publicity"
And as I said, they got it. Just not the sort of dissent and publicity they were expecting.
Guncriminal 1 year ago
@Guncriminal, "sound of shifting goal posts fill the air", in other words you were called on naming a single greenpeace financed fire bombing, genocide, etc. and couldn't.
"When your audience isn't laughing at the joke", there goes your ESP again, NO YOU'RE not laughing, others did laugh, others didn't laugh, and I thought it was stupid. "adusing the audience for" not thinking like you "isn't going to change that".
"not the sort of dissent and publicity they were expecting" ESP again.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@Guncriminal, "only eco-terrorists are likely to do that [blow up those who don't buy into the green agenda]. And that's precisly what we're seeing here". You must think life is so unfair, after all in your LITERAL mind Arnold Schwarzenegger is a mass murdering robot from the future, that can still be Governor of California.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen
Fuck you and your quote mining.
And since when does guessing someone's motives require ESP?
Guncriminal 1 year ago
@Guncriminal, "Fuck you"? Sorry I'm not gay, but good luck finding a boyfriend.
"your quote mining" what quote mining? You don't quote ANYTHING, which is extreme quoting mining on YOUR part. LOL.
"since when does guessing someone's motives...ESP", when you state your BS opinion as fact as in "not that they don't have the desire [to blow kids up]".
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@ZangaroZen
"You don't quote ANYTHING, which is extreme quoting mining on YOUR part. LOL."
And how am I quote mining of I'm not quoting anything? That's a good trick. Besides, I accused you of quoting out of context and you start talking about me not quoting anything. Nice red herring.
"when you state your BS opinion as fact as in "not that they don't have the desire [to blow kids up]"."
I said it was speculation, not a fact.
Guncriminal 1 year ago
i realy don't see anything funny about exploding children. i'm sure they could have found a better way to get thier piont across. at least less graffic.
wjc3wjc 1 year ago
Okay.
Now what if this was a video of groups/classrooms of Christians with a few atheists in there. No pressure. No pressure. (Press button) BOOM.
Still think it's funny?
Cihl280777 1 year ago
@Cihl280777, Yes, seing the minority of true believer Christians being blow up would be funny, if you don't take it literally like a complete moron. Good point.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
When we finish with you you ll wish you had as much rights as a tree . This was a quote from maurice strong and big big player in the eco cult . . . And i can tell you he was nt joking , these creeps at the top want total control of everything you need for life . Your food water , energy on and on . . . . Think very hard people because if you let them have this control you will deserve eveything thats comeing down the pike .
ozzycriss 1 year ago
@ozzycriss
you are absolutely right,
maurice strong is a disturbingly fucked up minded person who is in a position of power
MrCrowley9000 1 year ago
@ozzycriss, "these creeps at the top want total control of everything you need for life. Your food water, energy on and on...let them have this control you will deserve everything thats comeing down the pike", yes aren't corporations evil?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
as a film i just couldnt see the funny side, it was over produced and obviously completely lost track of itself during production. the utter lack of soul within this video is why advertising agencies should not do humour. i have no problem with sick or dark comedy but in my opinion i honestly couldnt see how anyone could find it funny.
tallnhairychild 1 year ago
Just like there are nuts who want to use eugenics to cut the population drastically (including you) and reduce our freedoms over fraudulent science?
aliencrap 1 year ago
When did i ever suggest eugneics??
total spaz fail
reckingmachine 1 year ago
@aliencrap, "reduce our freedoms over fraudulent science", obviously you want to trade science for the eternal truth in the bible. What could go wrong with returning to the middle ages?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
Would it still be funny if they pushed a button and the green zealots exploded?
chevick 1 year ago 2
@chevick, didn't see any "green zealots", or global warming hysterics, or any other inflammatory named extremists. But Yes.
The obvious intent, was to gain wide attention through edgy humor. However even though the skits were pulled near immediately from the 1010global(dot)org site, thanks to loud cry-baby detractors (such as yourself) the skits and 1010's goals have attained for more exposure then they could've ever hoped for.
You're doing a great job spreading 1010's message. Keep it up!
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@chevick, Yes. The religious corporate imperialist right should make such a video.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
stupid fat cunt wake the fuck up and smell the coffee
daviddevall 1 year ago
I honestly don't get the humor of blowing up whatever opposition you have to your viewpoint. I believe it's rather direct symbolism. They wouldn't be able to put that ad on out here in the USA because it would be ruled as a threat.
As for the message, I firmly believe these people want us to appease them. First, we cut emissions by 10% and that's not satisfying, they want an other 10%, then an other and an other. It never ends, NEVER, because the world will always be ending.
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago 2
dude, the video is NOT funny and you have shit instead of brains
pooltoo 1 year ago 3
@pooltoo, ironically your name resembles "PooToo" LOL
You say "video is NOT funny" thing is humor is individualistic and various widely. Saying "NOT funny", doesn't prove anything other then a delusion that your personal opinion is a defacto standard that trumps reality.
It takes less than "shit instead of brains" to realize your empty declaration followed by an infantile insult, are both moronic.
As for your comment being the highest rated with 5 thumbs up (socks?), you have company.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen Apparantely you lead a rather dull life if you find my name amusing, but good for you... Yes, humor can be tricky to grasp, especially for people unable to see the essence of things - relativists.
Joke stops being funny when someone gets seriously hurt or when the intention to hurt is disguised as humor. The ad shows individuals disagreeing with majority opinion being intentionally killed. For me, as one of dissenting, the message is clear - obey, or else... And THAT's NOT funny.
pooltoo 1 year ago
@pooltoo, "my name amusing", the IRONY of you saying "you have shit instead of brains" while naming yourself "pooToo" escapes you.
"Humor can be tricky to grasp, especially for people unable to see the essence", humor is not a mensa brain teaser. AGAIN "humor is individualistic and various widely...your personal opinion is [not] a defacto standard"
"stops being funny when...hurt is disguised as humor" then ignore everyone else's politically incorrect jokes.
"obey, or else" or else what?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
If you're having to explain this fucking shite video to everyone it's kinda failed hasn't it, dickhead? Too clever by half for the purpose it was intended for. In fact I'd go so far to say that it comes over as a piss take on the greens, and then the muppets helped promote it. Not very clever after all.
marmoset3 1 year ago 2
sounds like someone is wearing his grumpy pants today. Perhaps the reason it had to be explained is because the people who dont understand it happen to be idiots.
reckingmachine 1 year ago
@marmoset3 , "Not very cleaver after all" got you and thousands like you to talk about it and propagate the 1010 goals of reducing CO2. You've been had, but keep pushing the video.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
If that video is comedy then it is of the "Emperor Has no Clothes" variety. In other words, everyone says it is funny because they don't want to admit that they don't get it.
I'll make it simple for you - it wasn't funny.
The environmental movement has a long history of "population control" (i.e. genocide) and this video was simply a masturbatory fantasy for them. If you actually liked it then you are a sick fuck.
thegoodlocust 1 year ago
@thegoodlocust - You're right. Maurice Strong, among others including international union leaders like Andy Stern and activists like Medea Benjamin have stated the purpose of the Green movement is not to save the world but to institute an international wealth redistribution scheme. Andy Stern and Maurice Strong have both come out in favor of mass murder as a means of population control because overpopulation is supposedly such a huge problem.
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago
@Slipknotyk06, "wealth redistribution", how aweful, taxing people what they can afford while effecting the less numbers. How about we exchange "wealth redistribution" for "war death redistribution" and "exploitation redistribution". Funny now the rich rarely put their necks out in the wars to defend their country or do the back breaking work that made them rich.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen - First, screw your theories of exploitation. It's been proven throughout Asia and in India that Capitalism enriches the people. Also, that back breaking work common in developing countries is stuff those people would rather do than live on subsistence agriculture and wait for the next plague or famine to kill them! It's not equality of outcome that matters, it's equality of opportunity. Not everyone can act like John Travolta but everyone can try out!
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago
@Slipknotyk06, "proven throughout Asia...India...Capitalism enriches the people", funny how India and Asia had capitalism for a hundred years and it's only kicking in now. Why is that? Anything to do with exporting western jobs, globalization?
"back breaking work...stuff those people would rather do than live on subsistence agriculture", no one likes breaking their back, when did ever work that hard? You don't speak for indentured peoples.
"equality of opportunity" LOL you're dreaming.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen - Many Asian economies didn't open up until the 80s, and were hostile to outside interests with import quotas and tariff walls.
These people aren't indentured. They have a choice, a better life through difficult work or subsistence agriculture waiting for the next disaster to end their lives. I've worked hard and don't EVER doubt that. You don't know me, so don't make assumptions.
Equality of Opportunity exists. Prove me wrong.
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago
@Slipknotyk06, "Many Asian economies didn't open up until the 80s", obviously we weren't talking about the strictly communistic ones.
"people aren't indentured", you have no any idea third world hires. Think paid off middle men, multi-year commitments, etc.
"Equality of Opportunity exists. Prove me wrong" take your Travolta example, do YOU have an equal acting opportunity against him? No. Opportunity does not equal equality. Buying a lottery ticket does make you a millionaire.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen - China actually started opening up in the 80s, about 5-10 years after the death of Chairman Mao and guess what happened? Starvation stopped practically overnight.
The people of the third world would rather work in industry than subsistence agriculture, and have benefited greatly. Check out Absolute Poverty figures in India.
Equality of opportunity does exist. I can try out, and if I've worked on my acting and put in the EFFORT, I might just get the role.
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago
@Slipknotyk06, you proclaim "opening up in the 80s...Starvation stopped practically overnight". The last Chinese famine was 1958-61 as caused by Mao confiscating harvests to finance industrialization (trade lives for industrial growth). Your "over night" is actually 20 years. You pwn yourself.
"people of the third world would rather work in industry", where's the reputable poll?
"Poverty figures in India" credit globalization/job shifts.
"might just get the role" are the odds 50/50?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@ZangaroZen - Starvation was still going on inside China into the 80s, as food production lagged behind population growth.
There is no poll, but there is the increased rate of urbanization among developing nations.
Why did those jobs move to India? Could it be because of decreased business regulations?
The chances would be 50/50 assuming equal skills. That's the way it should be; a highschool cheerleader lacks the skills to be a doctor, but is fine as a waitress..
Slipknotyk06 1 year ago
@Slipknotyk06, "Starvation was still going on into the 80s" product a reputable link for 1960-80s famine deaths.
"There is no poll", As usual you can't back your empty claims.
Who lives in shanty towns that ring third world cities? Typically peasants conned into exchanging land for sweat shop jobs in the city.
"jobs move to India...decreased business regulation" don't forget sweat shops and cheap lives.
"50/50 assuming equal skills", assume you're Travolta's twin, who gets the job?
ZangaroZen 1 year ago
@thegoodlocust, "I'll make it simpel for you - it wasn't funny", any more personal opinions you'd like to declare as universal law?
"The environmental movement has a long history of "population control" (ie genocide) and thsi video was simply a a masturbatory fantasy", LOL name some non-war non-crazy dictator "environmental genocides". Just one or admit you're spouting crazy nonsense.
ZangaroZen 1 year ago