OK, to all those who are not patriotically blinded, I ask you this; The biggest lie in history, in your opinion is- (A) religion? or (B) 911? To all those who are blinded, I say to you this; FUCK YOUR NATIONAL PRIDE!! YOU GOT BRAIN-FUCKED!!!!!
i think ive ended this myth. research the Piper Alpha oil platform disaster in the 1980s. a 6" thick steel oil platform was subjected to 1800f temp for an hour due to an accident and toppled under the weight. steel melts at over 2600f, but you have to take into account the upper pressures. if 1832f can topple 6" thick steel with less upper weight, then i am sure jet fuel at 1560f can topple and buckle a tower with more top weight. having been a cynic, i now feel the fires toppled them all.
i think ive ended this myth. research the Piper Alpha oil platform disaster in the 1980s. a 6" thick steel oil platform was subjected to 1800f temp for an hour due to an accident and toppled under the weight. steel melts at over 2600f, but you have to take into account the upper pressures. if 1832f can topple 6" thick steel with less upper weight, then i am sure jet fuel at 1560f can topple and buckle a tower with more top weight. having been a cynic, i now feel the fires toppled them all.
nano-thermite was used to destroy the towers along with traditional cutter charges. 9/11 = Inside Job. Your government did it. Now go back to sleep so you can continue to be raped and pillaged blind by your government.
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Scholars for 911 Truth split into two groups?
Why are there NO professional/academic peer reviewed journals or papers substantiating 911 truther theories?
In a world (and nation) of Bush haters, why has no one taken your absolute proof" to the courts to convict the guilty conspirators? It only took 5 years for Jim Garrison to bring charges on the Kennedy assassination (clearly a much smaller conspiracy than 911).
#1 - Who knows, who cares? Infiltrate various groups then divide and conquer. Classic play book.
#2 - Career suicide. Academia has close ties with government funding. No one wants to go there.
#3 - Trying to, but judges don't want to go there either. April Gallup sued, Beverly Eckert sued, among others. If you can't impeach Bush for his war crimes, that should tell you something about the courts. It's rigged.
"#1 - Who knows, who cares? Infiltrate various groups then divide and conquer. Classic play book."
Scholars For 911 Truth split ON THEIR own because some wackos kept insisting the WTC was destroyed by mini nukes or critical mass weapons. 911 twoofer NWO govt. had NOTHING to do with it. Ask 911 twoofer messiah Dr. Steven Jones, he initiated the split.
"#3 - Trying to, but judges don't want to go there either. April Gallup sued, Beverly Eckert sued, among others. If you can't impeach Bush for his war crimes, that should tell you something about the courts. It's rigged."
Yeah, I know it's the New Wookie Order (NWO). Big Brother. They control it all.
They have soooo much control that they couldn't even keep it secret that they leaked a CIA agent's identity.
Q#1: Why Bush tried to block investigation of worst terrorist attack on American soil? Q#2: Why evidence was never tested for explosives and then heavily guarded and hastily shipped overseas? Q#3: Why FBI claims they have no hard evidence connecting OBL to 9/11? Q#4: Why 47 story high rise falls straight down in 7 seconds. IMPOSSIBLE without controlled demolition. 9/11 = INSIDE JOB.
You don't sound like a paid shill, just someone naive of the realities of history and government sponsored terrorism. You may want to study USS Liberty, a botched Israeli false flag, also USS Cole. Not to mention OKC Murrah, WTC 1993 where FBI supplies the bomb! 7/7 London false flag, Putin Russia bombing their own apartments, etc. etc. Bomb your own shit and blame it on the enemy. Get your own people fired up to fight the enemy and go to war.
So the fact that NIST lied about what happened means nothing to you?
I would think that anyone with elementary level cognitive thinking would at least start to question what they had to hide. Do I really need to prove to you that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel? It's funny how you guys always demand proof that they are lying but can never provide evidence to back up your claims.
I find it hard to believe that you could even debunk the flat earth theory let alone 911inside job.
If your so called "absolute proof" was worth the paper it was printed on you wouldn't be selling it on youtube to teenagers, you'd be in a court room.
So you claim that just because this argument is taking place on youtube and not a court room I must be wrong but by that logic you just debunked yourself as well good job.
Also I never claimed to have "absolute poof" you're the one throwing that word around. I believe there needs to be a real investigation because it's obvious to anyone with a basic understanding of physics that the NIST report is full of holes. Like what melted the metal and why the building came down at almost free fall speed.
Supposedly it was "mistaken" for an Egyptian ship half its size. BS! The Liberty had a huge satellite dish almost as wide as the ship. In 1967 satellite dishes were not in common use as they are today. Likely explanation: LBJ wanted to get into the war against Egypt and planned a "false flag" operation to be carried out by Israel and blamed on Egypt. The Israeli military at the time did not understand how to sink a US Navy ship with a good crew. False flag, like 9/11.
It's called Nano-thermite. Listen to the "AE 911 truth" video conference in response to the NIST blsht press conference. WE WANT A NEW INVESTIGATION NOW. Here are some ideas:
1. We must make 911 truth as visible as possible to the non-internet crowd.
-bring portable screen, pc, projectors to public places and play movies like ZERO An Investigation into 911, David Icke on 911 and Mysteries.
-pass out 911 t-shirts, stickers, papers with links to key sites, i.e. New American Century & RAD.
What cause the WTC's to collapse was the oven effect. That would account for some of the molten steel and as for the molten steel after they collapsed well I can for sure say that there were fires below the rubble creating the oven effect.
oven effect? that's a new one. complete rubbish too. No way any fires kept burning after the collapse. Fire needs air to keep burning and would've been completely smothered. No fires were visible during the collapse. Fires from jet fuel and office supplies do not create molten metal. think first.
Any1 with a brain knows that fire alone wont melt the steel but because the towers were aligned with a fire retardent material nothing else burned except for the floors that were hit with the plane. Now because the fire couldnt expand the heat built up to collapse the building. There was enough of a constant supply of oxygen inbetween the rubble to keep a fire going. The fire under the rubble would hav been surrounded by CEMENT so the eat would reflect off of it to heat the steel. More below
So u know if u didnt catch it b4, fire needs oxegyn. And just cus fire wasnt visible wen the towers fell doesn mean shit. U probably havent heard of EMBERS which can ignite a a flammable object. I would tell you to think first but I know 4 u CT's thats just impossible for u guys to do.
c'mon, you can't possibly believe this stuff you're spitting. Sure, cement is used in some furnaces but the cement doesn't increase the heat. Besides, reflected heat is not as hot as the original source. I doesn't really matter though because fire burning ANY material at ground zero, regardless of whether or not there was some sort of alien heat reflecting cement close by, would NOT melt steel.
great video. It was an inside job using thermite and small demolition charges to ignite the thermite, resulting in a remarkably quiet demolition. I think these may be the only thermite demolitions in history.
Nice work man, with some much crap on youtube about this its good to see ppl actually posting something that has facts in it. The funny thing is I remember having numberous conversations with ppl at the time of 9/11 and we were all saying there is no way that planes alone could bring those buildings down like that.
The source is City in the Sky, Times Books, Henry Hold and Company, LLC, 2003, page 131, as quoted by Jim Hoffman's page at 911researchdotwtc7dotnet/wtc/analysis/designdothtml#ref4
Here is what the Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice site says:
Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson White Paper
A white paper on the structure of the Twin Towers carried out by the firm of Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson contained eleven numbered points, including:
(cont.) The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707-DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.
Next time you'll be telling us that a flight school dropout who couldn't fly a Cessna was suddenly capable of flying a Boeing 757 with such aplomb that he could drop from about 266 feet a mile out to have the engines clear the lawn by a couple of feet as he hit the Pentagon 10 seconds later. And apart from the pitch, he managed to get the correct yaw and roll, and all whilst being thrown about by lateral forces varying from 1/2g to 2g. Or that burning paper can melt concrete. lol.
The aim was to fit as much as possible into the allotted ten minutes, but even at that pace, it would need much longer to really do justice to the subject. I would recommend that people first view the whole thing nonstop, and then go back and pause on some of the text frames.
Nice work Poseidon, but some of the text frames move too quickly for the rate at which I read. I read at the same speed at which the average person speaks, and going by that measure, the video is too fast-paced.
Five stars for the info therein, though: some of your research is beyond compare.
Two ten-minute slots would have allowed more time for some of the text frames, and additional info such as how a typical WTC 1 office floor in the fire zone had 56 tons of Cafco Blaze-shield II fireproofing which has independent laboratory test ratings of 360 psf for cohesion / adhesion and 2,380 psf compressive strength. And how the upper office floors had about 333 tons of steel and 785 tons of concrete. But that would have meant splitting into several parts.
OK, to all those who are not patriotically blinded, I ask you this; The biggest lie in history, in your opinion is- (A) religion? or (B) 911? To all those who are blinded, I say to you this; FUCK YOUR NATIONAL PRIDE!! YOU GOT BRAIN-FUCKED!!!!!
SuperNorthAmerica 1 year ago
plus the aluminum wings or fuselage couldnt possibly have damaged the solid steel beams of the inner core,
Its a much softer metal and should have crumpled.
However something took those steel beams out.
zenoist2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i think ive ended this myth. research the Piper Alpha oil platform disaster in the 1980s. a 6" thick steel oil platform was subjected to 1800f temp for an hour due to an accident and toppled under the weight. steel melts at over 2600f, but you have to take into account the upper pressures. if 1832f can topple 6" thick steel with less upper weight, then i am sure jet fuel at 1560f can topple and buckle a tower with more top weight. having been a cynic, i now feel the fires toppled them all.
ianupton 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i think ive ended this myth. research the Piper Alpha oil platform disaster in the 1980s. a 6" thick steel oil platform was subjected to 1800f temp for an hour due to an accident and toppled under the weight. steel melts at over 2600f, but you have to take into account the upper pressures. if 1832f can topple 6" thick steel with less upper weight, then i am sure jet fuel at 1560f can topple and buckle a tower with more top weight. having been a cynic, i now feel the fires toppled them all.
ianupton 2 years ago
@ianupton nut
mooners40 1 year ago
enginears built the towers and enginears brought them down
iam600yearsold 3 years ago
nano-thermite was used to destroy the towers along with traditional cutter charges. 9/11 = Inside Job. Your government did it. Now go back to sleep so you can continue to be raped and pillaged blind by your government.
felicity5150 3 years ago
3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:
Why did Scholars for 911 Truth split into two groups?
Why are there NO professional/academic peer reviewed journals or papers substantiating 911 truther theories?
In a world (and nation) of Bush haters, why has no one taken your absolute proof" to the courts to convict the guilty conspirators? It only took 5 years for Jim Garrison to bring charges on the Kennedy assassination (clearly a much smaller conspiracy than 911).
smartasa911twoofer 3 years ago
#1 - Who knows, who cares? Infiltrate various groups then divide and conquer. Classic play book.
#2 - Career suicide. Academia has close ties with government funding. No one wants to go there.
#3 - Trying to, but judges don't want to go there either. April Gallup sued, Beverly Eckert sued, among others. If you can't impeach Bush for his war crimes, that should tell you something about the courts. It's rigged.
felicity5150 3 years ago
"#1 - Who knows, who cares? Infiltrate various groups then divide and conquer. Classic play book."
Scholars For 911 Truth split ON THEIR own because some wackos kept insisting the WTC was destroyed by mini nukes or critical mass weapons. 911 twoofer NWO govt. had NOTHING to do with it. Ask 911 twoofer messiah Dr. Steven Jones, he initiated the split.
DEBUNKED.
smartasa911twoofer 2 years ago
"#2 - Career suicide. Academia has close ties with government funding. No one wants to go there."
Dr. Jones has tried and failed. Why would anybody endorse a paper that has NO FACTS backing it up.
DEBUNKED AGAIN.
smartasa911twoofer 2 years ago
"#3 - Trying to, but judges don't want to go there either. April Gallup sued, Beverly Eckert sued, among others. If you can't impeach Bush for his war crimes, that should tell you something about the courts. It's rigged."
Yeah, I know it's the New Wookie Order (NWO). Big Brother. They control it all.
They have soooo much control that they couldn't even keep it secret that they leaked a CIA agent's identity.
DEBUNKED YET AGAIN.
THREE STRIKES, YOU'RE OUT felicity5150!
smartasa911twoofer 2 years ago
Q#1: Why Bush tried to block investigation of worst terrorist attack on American soil? Q#2: Why evidence was never tested for explosives and then heavily guarded and hastily shipped overseas? Q#3: Why FBI claims they have no hard evidence connecting OBL to 9/11? Q#4: Why 47 story high rise falls straight down in 7 seconds. IMPOSSIBLE without controlled demolition. 9/11 = INSIDE JOB.
felicity5150 3 years ago
'Oven Effect' My backside-it was done by experts using some advanced form of thermite.
ric55 3 years ago
The NWO really blew it -- now that 9/11 has been exposed as a fraud people are waking up to all of their evil tactics to keep the people suppressed.
We now know the truth and it spells the end for the controlling elite. We will no longer voluntarily be slaves to their NWO.
kiaora12 3 years ago
OMG you're right!
The NWO DID blow it!
They even stopped sending me my weekly $911 checks for keeping the 911 cover up a secret.
smartasa911twoofer 3 years ago
You don't sound like a paid shill, just someone naive of the realities of history and government sponsored terrorism. You may want to study USS Liberty, a botched Israeli false flag, also USS Cole. Not to mention OKC Murrah, WTC 1993 where FBI supplies the bomb! 7/7 London false flag, Putin Russia bombing their own apartments, etc. etc. Bomb your own shit and blame it on the enemy. Get your own people fired up to fight the enemy and go to war.
felicity5150 3 years ago 2
So this is your so called "absolute proof" 911 was an inside job.
ROFL! When's the trial? I want to see you prove it with this "absolute proof".
I'll just add you to the list of hundreds of 911 twoofers I DEBUNKED.
It's so funny. You 911 twoofers HAVE NOTHING proving your dozen different theories.
KEEP WASTING YOUR TIME!
ROFL!
smartasa911twoofer 2 years ago
So the fact that NIST lied about what happened means nothing to you?
I would think that anyone with elementary level cognitive thinking would at least start to question what they had to hide. Do I really need to prove to you that jet fuel doesn't burn hot enough to melt steel? It's funny how you guys always demand proof that they are lying but can never provide evidence to back up your claims.
I find it hard to believe that you could even debunk the flat earth theory let alone 911inside job.
slider576 2 years ago
If your so called "absolute proof" was worth the paper it was printed on you wouldn't be selling it on youtube to teenagers, you'd be in a court room.
slider576 DEBUNKED!
smartasa911twoofer 2 years ago
So you claim that just because this argument is taking place on youtube and not a court room I must be wrong but by that logic you just debunked yourself as well good job.
Also I never claimed to have "absolute poof" you're the one throwing that word around. I believe there needs to be a real investigation because it's obvious to anyone with a basic understanding of physics that the NIST report is full of holes. Like what melted the metal and why the building came down at almost free fall speed.
slider576 2 years ago
RE: USS Liberty
Supposedly it was "mistaken" for an Egyptian ship half its size. BS! The Liberty had a huge satellite dish almost as wide as the ship. In 1967 satellite dishes were not in common use as they are today. Likely explanation: LBJ wanted to get into the war against Egypt and planned a "false flag" operation to be carried out by Israel and blamed on Egypt. The Israeli military at the time did not understand how to sink a US Navy ship with a good crew. False flag, like 9/11.
Skeptic121 2 years ago
It's called Nano-thermite. Listen to the "AE 911 truth" video conference in response to the NIST blsht press conference. WE WANT A NEW INVESTIGATION NOW. Here are some ideas:
1. We must make 911 truth as visible as possible to the non-internet crowd.
-bring portable screen, pc, projectors to public places and play movies like ZERO An Investigation into 911, David Icke on 911 and Mysteries.
-pass out 911 t-shirts, stickers, papers with links to key sites, i.e. New American Century & RAD.
ramjet73 3 years ago
wicked video.
jeroliver 3 years ago
What cause the WTC's to collapse was the oven effect. That would account for some of the molten steel and as for the molten steel after they collapsed well I can for sure say that there were fires below the rubble creating the oven effect.
goosehunter3492 3 years ago
oven effect? that's a new one. complete rubbish too. No way any fires kept burning after the collapse. Fire needs air to keep burning and would've been completely smothered. No fires were visible during the collapse. Fires from jet fuel and office supplies do not create molten metal. think first.
jeroliver 3 years ago
Any1 with a brain knows that fire alone wont melt the steel but because the towers were aligned with a fire retardent material nothing else burned except for the floors that were hit with the plane. Now because the fire couldnt expand the heat built up to collapse the building. There was enough of a constant supply of oxygen inbetween the rubble to keep a fire going. The fire under the rubble would hav been surrounded by CEMENT so the eat would reflect off of it to heat the steel. More below
goosehunter3492 3 years ago
So u know if u didnt catch it b4, fire needs oxegyn. And just cus fire wasnt visible wen the towers fell doesn mean shit. U probably havent heard of EMBERS which can ignite a a flammable object. I would tell you to think first but I know 4 u CT's thats just impossible for u guys to do.
goosehunter3492 3 years ago
That is some good stuff. cement reflecting rubble fire to melt steel. you sir, are on crack.
jeroliver 3 years ago
Learn and understand how a furnace works. Then u smell what Im steppin in.
goosehunter3492 3 years ago
c'mon, you can't possibly believe this stuff you're spitting. Sure, cement is used in some furnaces but the cement doesn't increase the heat. Besides, reflected heat is not as hot as the original source. I doesn't really matter though because fire burning ANY material at ground zero, regardless of whether or not there was some sort of alien heat reflecting cement close by, would NOT melt steel.
jeroliver 3 years ago
"well I can for sure say that there were fires below"
no. you can't. You weren't down there.
jeroliver 3 years ago
Awsome! Glad to see some REAL evidence on here for once!
zdagen 3 years ago
great video. It was an inside job using thermite and small demolition charges to ignite the thermite, resulting in a remarkably quiet demolition. I think these may be the only thermite demolitions in history.
noisecape 3 years ago
Nice work man, with some much crap on youtube about this its good to see ppl actually posting something that has facts in it. The funny thing is I remember having numberous conversations with ppl at the time of 9/11 and we were all saying there is no way that planes alone could bring those buildings down like that.
ProwlerDrummer 3 years ago
Nice work, some of the clearest shots-
what is the "white paper released 2/3/64" @ 6:53?
dfwtexxas 4 years ago
The source is City in the Sky, Times Books, Henry Hold and Company, LLC, 2003, page 131, as quoted by Jim Hoffman's page at 911researchdotwtc7dotnet/wtc/analysis/designdothtml#ref4
exposedeceivers 4 years ago
Here is what the Scholars For 9/11 Truth & Justice site says:
Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson White Paper
A white paper on the structure of the Twin Towers carried out by the firm of Worthington, Skilling, Helle & Jackson contained eleven numbered points, including:
exposedeceivers 4 years ago
(cont.) The buildings have been investigated and found to be safe in an assumed collision with a large jet airliner (Boeing 707-DC 8) traveling at 600 miles per hour. Analysis indicates that such collision would result in only local damage which could not cause collapse or substantial damage to the building and would not endanger the lives and safety of occupants not in the immediate area of impact.
--City in the Sky, p 131
stj911dotorg/evidence/wtcdothtml
exposedeceivers 4 years ago
Yea right. Next time we know you'll be telling us that black water boys did it and that some of the thermate was fired by helicopters...
Rastamafata 4 years ago
Next time you'll be telling us that a flight school dropout who couldn't fly a Cessna was suddenly capable of flying a Boeing 757 with such aplomb that he could drop from about 266 feet a mile out to have the engines clear the lawn by a couple of feet as he hit the Pentagon 10 seconds later. And apart from the pitch, he managed to get the correct yaw and roll, and all whilst being thrown about by lateral forces varying from 1/2g to 2g. Or that burning paper can melt concrete. lol.
exposedeceivers 4 years ago
well said, the lack of intelligence some people display is an utter disgrace
*glares at rasta*
noisecape 3 years ago
u r the best youtuber ever
moppix 4 years ago
The aim was to fit as much as possible into the allotted ten minutes, but even at that pace, it would need much longer to really do justice to the subject. I would recommend that people first view the whole thing nonstop, and then go back and pause on some of the text frames.
exposedeceivers 4 years ago
Nice work Poseidon, but some of the text frames move too quickly for the rate at which I read. I read at the same speed at which the average person speaks, and going by that measure, the video is too fast-paced.
Five stars for the info therein, though: some of your research is beyond compare.
InfensusMentis 4 years ago
Two ten-minute slots would have allowed more time for some of the text frames, and additional info such as how a typical WTC 1 office floor in the fire zone had 56 tons of Cafco Blaze-shield II fireproofing which has independent laboratory test ratings of 360 psf for cohesion / adhesion and 2,380 psf compressive strength. And how the upper office floors had about 333 tons of steel and 785 tons of concrete. But that would have meant splitting into several parts.
exposedeceivers 4 years ago