Drew Peterson: "I murder her"

[smokekindherb]

As a bolingbrook resident, and an acquaintance of the missing; This backmasking is RIGHT ON! She was talking in the weeks and days beforehand about wanting a divorce but not knowing what to do because she had no way out, and he could find her anywhere. There WAS NO OTHER MAN!!! She loved her kids and wasnt going to leave them behind. I hope he rots in his jail cell.

[corebare]

You idiots. IDIOTS!!!!

[polskie90]

obviously this isn't a credible way of proving anything. The courts won't even admit it as evidence.

[horrorscope71270]

People have been brain washed into thinking solving ANYTHING is complicated and hit and miss...and that the people solving are supposed to be EDUCATED and INTELLIGENTLY capable. Instead when we find that WE can do ANYTHING anyone else can do but EASIER...we can't believe the power was with us THIS WHOLE TIME and we feel stupid and lied to...THAT is why we don't believe how EASY all this shit is for US to take our OWN responsibility.

[arieswitch376]

So never get involved with a guy named peterson. Period!!

[Midnightryder7]

did they ever find her?

[TheWanderinMinstrel]

My friggin dog just chewed my best sneekers up, or was my dog requesting another slice of toast. Iwannanotherpeeseatoashhhhhhhh­hhhhht.

[robbassbass]

"I had to put a lady into the fishy bottomy?" CASE CLOSED MOTHER FUCKERS!

Thanks detective ShaunHS, you solved this baffling case!!!

[DeadFearProductions]

@robbassbass ROFL that was my favorite reversal part, they never check the fishy bottomy!!!!!

[Eudie64]

Speech reverse: CRAP!

[zellballen]

wait actually sounds more like "I never hurt her"

[zellballen]

sounds like "A nerd herder". This is fucking retarded. Who is so fucking gullible they would buy in to this bullshit?

[AfroSchmuck]

It even sounds Scandinavian xD Why is he saying "I murder her?" Did he? Or does he fell responsible for her death?

[AfroSchmuck]

Okay I had no idea there are more quotes, DAMN! Especially the RS, "Must fly, throw her shit over..." and he OWNS a micro plane...

[penbus492]

wow they have a daughter named Lacy like Lacey Peterson the one that was murdered by her husband Scott Peterson when she was prego and he drowned her odd.

[jibbity99]

this is great, considering her body has just been found and it will prove he killed her

[zubernick]

Do you think that because a body was found (not yet determined to be Stacy's) that event somehow validates this video? If so, I'd really like to know why you think so. I'm also curious to know why, if the body is Stacy's, you think it will prove Drew killed her. This I gotta hear.

[jibbity99]

who are you? drew's girlfriend LOL

shes the only one retarded enough to think he didnt kill those two women.

[zubernick]

I think he could have killed both of his last two wives, but there's a vast gulf between thinking and proving, especially using this RS nonsense. The only certain thing finding Stacy's body would prove is that she's dead. Just because she's dead and her husband's an asshole, I don't think the standard of proof required for a conviction would be met.

Maybe Shawn here can Ouija up some spirit RS from Stacy and find out where her appendages are. (Theme from Twilight Zone)

[1011010]

CNN News: Wednesday May 27 2009. Headline:

"Remains found in Illinois are not Stacy Peterson"

[xXxHellvictoriaxXx]

mmk a lil odd

[1aeromed]

this is stupid

[JillianHallFan765]

that 1st picture of Drew Peterson scared me! I think..no..I KNOW hes guilty!

[hinsdale19]

ahh thats scary!

[atrickpay11]

Man, that is creepy.

[allenamerica]

if only i could reverse the time i spent watching this video

[1011010]

I recorded myself reading aloud your responses to my posts. Then I reversed the audio. No, I'm not kidding. I found: "They say it's the body fact." "Valid he sheep server" "sheep server" "sheep server" "It didn't involve me" and my favorite, "exploit zilla resisting the senate will leave your wolf's hair off and a shave gets happening in the V8." This was the reverse of "...aid in an investigation. RS will reveal innocence as well as guilt."

[AtomicAlchemist]

OMG, I'm sorry, but ARE YOU FUCKING CRAZY OR SOMETHING!?!?!?!?!? I think you are; you are fucking insane.

[zubernick]

The burden of proof is on you, brah. What exactly is the "provable track record"? Who proved it and how? What cases have been broken by its use? Is it admissible in court? If people are so subconsciously hell bent on incriminating themselves, why isn't there an RS expert on every Nancy Grace show?

Because it's crap. Just because you've invested heavily in it don't make it so. I am able to change my mind in the face of incontrovertible evidence - how 'bout you? Wow me.

[ShawnHS]

Perhaps you could "wow me" and do your own diligence.

I'll make it easy for you. Go to David Oates website "Reverse Speech". Read the multitude of documents available, and listen to the thousands of examples. There are hundreds of examples on my site

Then you could venture into the paranormal where you will find that those in spirit often have additional messages in RS. An excellent source - "The International Ghost Hunters Society".

[zubernick]

It's called "due diligence". You persist in making unsupportable, self-referential claims. RS can help you make better investment decisions? A clean colon for health and wealth? You're in the snake oil biz. These clips are advertisements. Too bad you're inflicting this on your trusting children - that should really give them a leg up in life. Don't worry about learning economics or the time value of money kids, the ghosts will tell you how to invest if you just listen hard enough.

[ShawnHS]

It would appear all you have to offer to support your position are derogatory comments.

So loud each tongue, so empty was each head, So much they talked, so very little said. - Charles Chuchill

[zubernick]

I ask for facts and you're "an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing." I quote poetry too, but that's not the point. If you had a leg to stand on, you would have dragged it out by now and beat me with it.

I read a study of schizophrenics' writings and it was an eerie insight into the workings of the mind - they all started out sane enough and suddenly I felt as if I had walked onto mental quicksand. However compelling the lead in, there are places I can't go, turns I can't make.

[Debbin]

Had a strong feeling you would be with IGH

[ShawnHS]

IGHS was the first to discover reverse speech exists with those in spirit.

[Debbin]

Good enough, but I remember it as "discovered" many, many years prior...as your statement above also explains.

At any rate, this is something I expect will be further researched into :)

[zubernick]

Utterly specious fabrication. I'm not saying your premise that Peterson is guilty is incorrect, only that you are literally cramming your words into his mouth.  .ylf t'nod tsuj tI Wierd juju.

[ShawnHS]

Are you nuts? Do some research on Reverse Speech and come back when you when you have something to support your opinion.

[zubernick]

I've done hostile interrogations and, yes, I did do my research before commenting. This process has no credibility and better represents the interpreter's projected beliefs than anything in the subject's mind. Some pseudo-scientist dropped his tape recorder in the crapper (now that's Freudian) and when he tried to fix it, he reversed the current and it devolved from there. Ranks with the reading of burnt entrails or Scientology's E meter. Have fun but don't hurt yourselves or others!

[zubernick]

What, no witty, erudite rebuttal replete with solved cases, court admissibility, rewards earned, scientific proof, credible endorsements, or sales offers? The more I think about this the more it insults the intelligence. If true, every speech should be a dialogue in reverse - not snippets of garbled Ouija Board nonsense. Tenacity of belief is manifested when someone invests so many resources into a belief system that when it is found to be untrue they still cannot afford to give it up.

[ShawnHS]

The evidence is in the results of more than 25 years of research. You conveniently have left out the provable track record of RS. By the way, I don't see that you have provided anything to support your "opinion".

[zubernick]

"In order for me to fully appreciate and understand the importance of speech reversals, I believe I've had to experience and explore many aspects of the paranormal and mystical."

OK, now I understand why we'll never agree.  I'm not big on past life regression and listening for spirits' RS or the efficacy of colon cleansers. I don't think you're wrong per se, just that RS is mystical and not objective. You've as much as admitted that on your web site. PS, the word is insight, not incite.

[1011010]

Fun stuff! If backward masking was good enough in the 80s and 90s to persecute rock musicians for corrupting our nation's youth, why wouldn't it be good enough in 2009 as evidence of murder?

[ShawnHS]

Actually "backmasking" is the intentional placement of reversed speech into music, and has nothing to do with the phenomena of Reverse Speech. With the lawsuit of Judas Priest they did not use backmasking, it was RS in their music. Since RS is the ultimate truth detector, it absolutely should be used as another tool by law enforcement to aid in an investigation. RS will reveal innocence as well as guilt.

[1011010]

Move over magnetic healing and psi-balls, it's the ultimate truth detector, reverse speech. So where do I find the "stats" on RS? If Peterson is found guilty of murder, you will say "See, there was the 'evidence'." It is a clever scheme. RS and Backmasking have similarities because they operate around the presumption that the human mind processes sound and speech in two directions and I don't know that this has ever been proven. Source? RS seems flawed in that it relies on human interpretation.

[ShawnHS]

What is open to interpretation are polygraph tests. Which in this case RS has clearly stomped on. The polygraph should go the way of the dinosaurs to make way for RS! To be specific I have previously documented prior to DP's arrest from an interview he did on WBBM on 9-30-09. In the interview he is reading the questions from the polygraph, his response, and the polygraph results. (cont.)

[ShawnHS]

(cont.) Quote: "Did you have any involvement in the death of your ex-wife Kathy in 2004? I answered "no". There was no deception there."

Reversal: "Beside the fact that involved me."

This audio can be heard on my website "Backward State" a link is on my You Tube home page.

you can find plenty of "stats" on the internet regarding the validity and accuracy of RS. (cont.)

[ShawnHS]

(cont.) You can go to David Oates' site "Reverse Speech", see the library section. Read the article "Brain can decode speech backwards"

I can say "There's the 'evidence' now". Once again, I document his reversals (currently approx. 63) all prior to his arrest. Assuming the prosecution does their job, once he is convicted the naysayers can be certain RS had it right all along!

If it is right about Kathy how about Stacy?

Correction: date of interview previously mentioned should read 9-30-"08"

[1011010]

That's exactly the problem I'm having in parsing this: Peterson is already a strong suspect and you are attempting to find incriminating RS snippets to justify the validity of RS accuracy. That's circular logic. There are numerous logical fallacies going on here: improper authority, circular arguments, & stacking the deck to name a few. If Peterson's missing wife is found in a forest instead of a "fishy bottomy", does that count as a success or a failure for RS?

[1011010]

I wish to remain respectful of you on your channel. With that, I am having serious trouble digesting this RS stuff. I notice, for example that you are focusing on people who are already major suspects of crimes. How can RS be used to find suspects, for example? Are RS pratitioners looking for "I didn't kill her" in the reversals or just the "I killed her" messages? I'm also troubled by the questionable interpretation of the words. "Fishy bottomy" was cool, buuut...

[krissy3409]

I find this interesting.Can you reverse speech casey anthony? now THAT I would love to see!!

[ShawnHS]

I have a couple of You Tube videos posted on my You Tube home page and many reversals of Casey on my web site Backward State where their is a link on the home page too. There are also reversals of Cindy, Lee, and Caylee.

[djbethell]

Now this is so, so desperate.

[ShawnHS]

Is that you Drew?

[djbethell]

etarepsed si YLLAER taht won

[deadIyx]

sooooooooooooooooooooo

[gridlocksystem]

Some people still can not believe that you can double-face and triple-face text and speech.

Double cross, and tell something that is ment in a sarcasting way.

Those people have one thing in common : agressive talking, and saying something without a reasonable explanation. So try to wake the fuck up before your Heimat Security locks you up in the Femacamps.

[Kingmarysue]

Guilty! This is one of the funniest videos ever!

[astrolifter]

All you skeptics that are so adamant that reverse speech isn't valid need to start doing your own random reversals. This is what I've done, and I guarantee you that this phenomena is very real!

[SpectreCGR]

Actually reverse speach isn't even an accepted science by main stream forensic researchers. It has not been proven as 100 percent accurate (as previously claimed) and most folks that are in or close to forensic investigation think of David John Oates and his devotees as a bunch of fruit loops.

I Personally believe Peterson is guilty by shear probabilities (although I can't be absolutely certain) but I wouldn't be the one to convict him based on this crap.

[idiottester]

whoever made this is an ASSHOLE!!!!!!!!!!

[ShawnHS]

Refer to my previous response!

[Metalstr8jacket]

Oh. for Christ's sake.... Grow up. My god, I won't say he's innocent but WTF man? you thing the Deutsch bag planned to secretly give up his position in the situation, to be heard backwards? either your really REALLY smart.... or he's a total fucking, nimrod n I doubt he is. Please relax with the conspiracy type BS. He'll get caught, but not due to this video. I assure you.

[ShawnHS]

You obviously know nothing about reverse speech. It's amazing the type of people like yourself that come out of the woodwork with such strong opinions on a subject they are totally oblivious to. Here is a clue. Reverse speech was discovered over 25 yrs. ago and has proven to be 100% accurate.

This video is only a sample of info. that's revealed through reverse speech on Drew P. More details are on the Backward State site. The only thing missing at this time is a pinpoint location of Stacy.

[idiottester]

i always played records in reverse when i was a kid.this is just nonsense end of story.if this asshole came right out & said he did it they would still have trouble putting him away.

[GLENNTILE]

the mind is like a parachute. it only works when its open. do more research on this. download the free program the audio reversl program its free. and if you still have win xp or any windows os  besides vista. you can get a mic and ask your self ?'s and reverse them to get some freakish results. but u know everthing already dont bother

[musicmylifemalay]

everything happens for a reason. YOU grow up!

[petertan2]

Exactly, I mean if you really are planning on giving these reversed messages, then why the fuck do the messages sound so awkwardly structured and farfetched? I mean "You must fly, throw her shit over" Come ON!! What the hell has flying got to do with this. This shows that some ppl are really REALLY desperate for answers, and this really pisses me off.

[Metalstr8jacket]

:-D Thank you!!!

[stok3d99]

this is amazing

[krazykelly4]

omg this is s0o0o stupid!

[milliondustopeners]

great reversal man. i just got into this. you should hear my reversals

[Ovechkin81]

You are a fucking joke

[busdrivergal]

You've got to be kidding.