@so-called cleverfeller, if one could be dumber n sin, you would certainly be there. Are you really so frakken retarded spiritually that you can't even discern the simplest truth, sheesh the person puts the video up, with BOTH forwards AND reverse speech (at 3 different speeds no less) and so you have ALL the scientific proof, and you still act like a pure dumbasz without even the barest of comprehension...you must be so lacking in knowledge it hurts...
What a load of rubbish! Putting into peoples heads that she is dead, means that she may not be noticed if those persons happened to see her at some point down the line - Un reported because she is "dead" so it couldnt be her... You people are too cruel. Suspect the parents all you like i say, but for christ sake dont spout off that she's dead or a sighting may be over looked
No one noticed the mother is talking in the past about Maddie? If she was so certain about Maddie being alive, she would talk about her like she ís alive..
@anoniem04 Hey well spotted, that reminds me of Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr when they were interviewed by the press, they spoke about holly wells and Jessica Chapman in past tense before the girls were found.
Good work - def. something to this. Have suspected them right from the start. Something is very sinister here and the abduction story just doesn't add up.
There needs to more petitions for the case to be re-investigated and these lying fraudsters to be behind bars - child neglecting drunken liars n fraudsters - all the money they made n they're not even her legal guardians anymore and know she's dead - most likely killed her themselves the way they looked so happy and played tennis the next day!
"I seen as involved with this" "My wife says there is no other avenue" "Slay with fists, Madeleine" "My honesty scandalous" - What the H***? What is that supposed to mean???
You're fitting the sounds to what you want - the sounds are so vague, if one listens to the backward speech without reading your interpretations one could come up with anything. '" It's unbelievable" sounded to me like ...." a Marguerita"...perhaps Kate's favourite cocktail. Personally I believe they know what happened to their child and are covering up, maybe accidental death due to negligence and over medicating. There are so many inconsistenioes - political decision to close the file
Oh well that proves it. They decided to get rid of one of their three kids and cleverly planned a mass media campaign to raise cash for a lavish lifestyle which they couldn't afford on two doctors' salaries alone. It wasn't enough to be earning around $400,000 per year between them. The tempation to escape their $400,000 per year poverty trap was just too great. They couldn't stand the pressuer of that poverty any more so they decided for the less pressurized life of murder and a media spotlight
We all communicate in a bi-language which originates from the unconscious mind and has been dubbed as reverse speech. If you want to learn about it. See my previous posts on this thread. Do an internet search. Go to my website Backward State. Go to David Oates website Reverse Speech. Otherwise you're just making yourself look silly with each post you make by not backing up your opinion with any facts.
I'm not sure what you mean. I found the speech reversals on the McCann's. I haven't manipulated anything to send any type of message. The reversals are the McCann's own words. If the message bothers you, contact the McCann's and ask them about it.
The court in Portimão released a DVD with the police files to those who had requested it .They are now available in the net.Google "The maddie case files".Lots of information the majority of the public has never seen.Pictures, statements given by the mccanns, friends and witnesses to the police (see the discrepancies).It contains also the lab reports and dog's results.See what the filthy british media has been hiding from you.
Its bullshit standards of 'evidence' like this that are partly responsible for most people being skeptical of the proper evidence, e.g. that produced by the sniffer dogs.
The truth is only distorted by this kind of quackery, never helped. Im sure there is more than enough proof out there, speech reversal isnt it...
The dogs indicated a dead body was in the apartment. The McCann's reverse speech imply she is dead, so what the heck are you talking about? Secondly I doubt you know anything at all about Reverse Speech to qualify you to make any negative comments about it. If you do, please be specific with your enlightenment.
Someone posted a comment here in regards to micro-expressions and how they're as a tool to detect the truth or lack therefore. further stating reverse speech doesn't have the credentials. I'm paraphrasing because I accidentally hit the "remove" tab instead of "reply. Whoever that was please feel free to re-post.
My response to that is, determining a micro-expressions meaning is pretty subjective. Whereas the results of reverse speech are available for all to scrutinize as to its accuracy. There are thousands examples of reverse speech available that prove its validity AND accuracy.
Its another example of information quackery - you are searching for meaningful patterns in random data, its the same nonsense as people who write about the bible code.
Give me a link to a proper scientific study demonstrating reverse speech.
Again what are you talking about. Are you saying you can't hear any of Gerry and Kate's reverse speech? Are you saying that over 60 reversals on them are "patterns in random data"? I wonder what the odds are on that one.
Wilm0chimp,what evidence do u have that gerry and kate are responsible for maddies death,if you have none(which i suspect u aint)please "shut the fuck up"
Let me first say i believe this man and the evidence is damning. But I don't get is if she did die "accidentally" would the parents take the massive risk of trying to get rid of the body?
Know this is where it gets scary, i believe if it was simply an accident under normal circumstances if the body didnt have daming evidence they would simply go to the police but imo the body may have been abused and held tarces of semon from Jerry or one of the Tapas 9 lot, also maybe high traces of sedatives.
A friend of the McCanns, Katharine Gaspar, gave a statement to the police after Madeleine was killed, telling them about the time David Payne was describing to Gerry McCann how Madeleine sucked his cock. You can read the full transcript on the mccannfiles . com website. Search for 'david payne' on the site.
Reverse Speech is a real phenomenon of bi-level communication. EEG test show significant changes when someone hears a speech reversal. In other words, our subconscious minds pick up the on the reversal perfectly.
Well done Shawn, I hope John Oates....or assocciates has reversed the McCann's speech, we may find out one day eh! Something's missing, and MUST be revealed imho.
As far as I know I have done the most extensive research of the McCann's interviews for reverse speech. I have found over 60 combined reversals of the McCanns which tells a different story than their daughter being abducted. These can be heard on my website Backward State.
Praia De Luz = 'Sacrifice of the 33rd Degree Spinal Bone' = $ = Freemasons Nazi NHS using reverse psychology medical term's like A.D.H.D for Punch & Judy, and Armarna for Panzer!
Do you really think that Madeleine would be burried under a bridge being that both parent's and their Tapa Crew were all in the Medical Industry, and everyone of them was involved in REASERCH, especially Ketamine = Anesthesia = "We let her down" = Medical Surgery Theatre Jargon for anesthesisit's, and Jerry's brother John McCann's a traveling sale's rep for a Global Pharmasutical company; so whose trying to kid a Hi$ler!
Obviously you don't read enough of a right hemisphere Syn(SINE)aestheis Thesurus Book called a Bible often enough t understand right hemisphere conscious coherence then!
ref near a bridge: quote from message on the help find madeleine mccann video;
sugga (10 months ago) 0
Reply | Spam
Polish clairvoyant Mr Krzysztof Jackowski from Czluchow said that Madeleine has been killed by her parents...Her body is covered with stones under the bridge...I think that police should keep on searching her...
Whether or not they were directly involved in this childs death, they are guilty of inexcusable negligence and abuse of their children. They left them night after night unattended! Gave them Paracetamol regularly, which is chemical abuse! Shame on you both, and you both took the Hippocratic oath! Clarence Mitchell is so pompous, arrogant and obnoxious.The McCanns are chillingly suspicious, enjoy the pseudo-celebrity status they have created, and perpetuate the story for their own financial gain
I have a weird suspicion about the recognition device for their NWO security. If they just bring it in, it,s violation of our privacy. If it's for a little girl with a mark in her eye. (born in vitro maybe the dad never accepted her. Maybe she was a selected gene. Who knows. But their recognition system will flow through because we all still have a heart for kids and elders and such.
Your unconscious mind does not backmask your thoughts. That's the biggest pile of bullshit I've ever heard, and this is coming from someone who knows a scientologist ¬_¬
If they want to swim in the river of Denile then let them, I just wish they would shut up or loose thier other kids. THE BRITSIH PEOPLE ARE SICK OF YOU BAD PARENTS
Interesting videos. Their theory is a little off according to Kate's reverse speech. Amaral believes the child died in the apartment and it was accidental. His theory is Madeleine may have climbed on the couch, and fell. By Kate's reversals "Slay with fists, Madeleine." and "only swat her" suggests she was angry when she hit Madeleine accidentally killing her.
@ShawnHS why all this on going drama from them over the years?..looks like kate is about to have a nervous breakdown..don't they want to lay at least low?
Shawn, you're right. My comment was made towards the parents in that thye've made some very wild accusations while never taking responsibility for the fact they left their children alone, in harms way.
It doesn't matter who killed Maddy if she is in fact dead. Her parents, who were legally and morally bound to do EVERYTHING within their power to protect her failed miserably by leaving her alone in an unlocked apartment in a foreign country at night. Would any of us even do this at home? NO, absolutely not, and as such they are completely responsible, They should be arrested. In the US you can be arrested for leaving a child in a locked car alone - what the the McCanns did was far worse.
I think it does matter who killed her. According to Kate's speech reversal she did it. Although her reversals seem to indicate it was accidental, I don't know what you call when the parents then cover it up and weave a tale of being victims generating sympathy around the world. It appears the McCann's are politically connected. Perhaps that is how they were able to deflect the investigation. I think Kate sums it up in her reverse speech when she says "But we're still the shield of murder".
Funny, you allow comments but don't like them when they don't agree with your view-point. Now that is hardly an open-mind. You're playing with real peoples' lives. As they are in the media you seem to forget the person and see them as nothing more than something to judge and rip apart. Your claim I know nothing about RS is more gibberish. I've known about it for about 20 years. I was interested for a while until everything I heard was just the interpretator's transference.
Your "comments" are baseless. True speech reversals have proven to be 100% accurate over the past 25 years. Therefore it can be said the truth will be found in one's Reverse Speech. In the case of the McCann's I have posted 37 reversals of Kate and 24 of Gerry on my Backward State site. Their combined reversals tell the truth of the story, and it doesn't involve their daughter being abducted. Where a polygraph relies on the opinion of the tester, a reversal is for all to hear objectively.
"True speech reversals have proven to be 100% accurate over the past 25 years." Facts and figures please? Independent studies please? So accurate that law agencies are using this process? Of course not! Wishing it were true doesn't make it true. All guess work, projection and transference of the listener. 5.34 still not answered. That's just one little example out of so many more I could chose from. The listener will hear what they want to hear. Thankfully this will never be allowed in court.
Once again if you've actually had ever done any research on the phenomena you would already know the answers to your questions. Go to David Oates site - Reverse Speech. Go to the "Library - Archived Audio & Video". From there he has dozens of articles. Some of the articles:
I'm well acquainted with David Oates. Most academics in the field of linguistics have not paid attention to Oates' work, and it has been called a pseudoscience.universities and research institutes have refused to test Oates' theories because of a lack of theoretical basis to make his predictions even worth testing, and the fact that many of his claims are untestable, but one of the few scientific experiments to evaluate Oates' claims did not support his findings.
From David Oates' site "Frequently Asked Questions";
Is there any academic endorsement of Reverse Speech?
Many individual academics have taken Reverse Speech classes and privately endorse Reverse Speech. However wide spread acceptance of the work has not yet taken place. The Oregon state police have accepted Reverse Speech as an optional extra in there training program. Additionally California State University recently published a paper that found the brain was able to decode speech backwards.
Others have criticized "reverse speech" as lacking a rigorous methodology and not being informed by an understanding of issues in linguistics and characterized Oates as "more interested in making a profit than educating others," pointing out the large amount of merchandise and services his website sells. Reverse speech has been compared to the controversial field of neuro-linguistic programming.
It would appear that you are vaguely referencing the article from the Skeptical Inquirer written by Tom Byrne and Mathew Normand called "An Analysis of Reverse Speech, The Demon-Haunted". The well written response to that article can be found on David Oates' site and is called "Our Reply to the Skeptical Inquirer".
Because of the "dogmatic" tone of Oates' material, reverse speech has been compared to "fringe literature."
Oates' own claims about the applications of reverse speech have also been challenged. One report has questioned whether reverse speech was ever really used in police work, as Oates claimed. His claim that reverse speech has applications in psychology and psychotherapy is not supported by mainstream research in those fields.
You're labeling his position as "dogmatic". Is it because he refuses to back down in his rightful stance in the validity and accuracy of Reverse Speech. Who specifically has compared it to "fringe literature"? Which "report" has proof that RS has not been used in police work? Where is your evidence that RS is not supported in psychology and psychotherapy? Would it be those in the field that would have their income reduced by actually helping people in a short period of time instead of years?
Oates' work has been described as "dangerous" because of its potential for misuse and the likelihood of leading to false accusations of people in criminal courts, similarly to the controversial practice of facilitated communication. The human brain automatically tries to make sense out of any noise as soon as it expects that noise to be a spoken language. The power of suggestion is then used to nudge the listener to hear what the presenter wants them to hear.
Your posts are becoming redundant, and you are not backing up your opinion with any specifics let alone facts. Oh, but wait, you're still referencing the article from the Skeptical Inquirer aren't you?
David John Oates almost always tells the listener in advance what they should expect to hear, thereby planting a suggestion that would make the listener more likely to actually "hear" that phrase. A study has shown that when listening to the same clips without being told in advance what to expect, the results have a higher variation. Oates claims that RS has applications in psychotherapy, and criminology. His claims have been rejected by mainstream science and academia. 5.34?
You've done nothing to advance your position other than regurgitating garbage from the Skeptical Inquirer. Perhaps it is the only thing you have to hang your hat on to support your personal belief that RS does not exist.
I would imagine there are many people, maybe even yourself, who are made nervous of RS by the idea that the pure honesty of one's true thoughts can be revealed to others on a conscious level by taking their recorded speech and reversing it.
But where more importantly is your proof? You can't even answer 5:34!!! I've nothing to prove, whereas you do. You can quote David Oates all you like and that's all you quote even about Oregan police; that's one man's voice regurgitating his own unbacked-up personal beliefs. That's not 'specifics' or tested and proven facts, just hot air. Give me proper independent studies and we'll talk but until that time I'm really not here to listen to recycling. It's your page so have the last word. Adios.
This guessing game's intolerable. Play this to 10 different people and your get 10 different ideas. This all depends on whether you think they're guilty or not. That's how the interpretations come about. Transfering what's in your head to what you want to hear. Listen without seeing the subtitles and it's rubbish. Hear it with the subtitles and it's still rubbish. Take 5.34 for example; if you can hear "I won't surrender" there, you're just completely trolling. Its drivel. Pretty sad, really.
What's sad is someone posting something negative about a subject they know nothing about. Try watching the You Tube video "The reverse speech blind test".
What specifically is "sick"? Does it bother you that the McCann's may be responsible for their daughters disappearance and the ensuing cover up, of which they would then appear to be getting away with it?
Maybe if you actually did a little research on the subject you might qualify as having an opinion on it, but until then I'll have to question who is the one that is full of it!
I also find it interesting that by their own words the "pattern", the overall analysis of their combined speech reversals, that seems to be as to what actually happened to Madeleine was not an abduction.
Why are the Voices of kate and greey reversed the same voice they dont have the same voice when they speak normally so why when they are reversed hmmmmm
when she first went missing they informed sky news then 2 hours later they imformed the police. Why the fuck would you do that if your child had gone missing god i fucking hate her parents they are pure evil filth who don't deserve children
its the kidnappers fault an i dont think the parents did anything you no thats probably what the abducter wants you to think that the parents did something to her so the police an people would do more blaming the parents then finding maddie so the abducter would get away with the horrific crime the kidnapper commited dont blame the parents for leaving the kids alone it was a mistake people make mistakes its a fact of life they havent done anything to maddie she was abducted i no it find maddiex
According to the reverse speech analysis of the McCann's, there is nothing to indicate they believe their daughter was abducted. It does reveal something far different. It is not a "fact of life" they had not done anything to their daughter.
Obviously you're referring to The Beatles when they intentionally put words into some of their songs backwards, so that when a record was played backwards they could be heard. This is known as backmasking, and has nothing to do with the natural phenomena of Reverse Speech!
Of all the totally ridiculous and laughable anti-McCann theories or 'evidence' I've encountered, this is the most ridiculous and laughable of them all. Some people really will believe in any old rubbish!
This video represents a small sample of the McCann's speech reversals. The rest can be heard at my Backward State web site. These are their words, not mine nor anyone else. Therefore how can it be "anti-McCann"?
Reverse Speech was discovered over 25 yrs. ago and has proven to be 100% accurate. Whether you want to believe it or not is irrelevant!
The McCann's speech reversals could just as easily prove their innocence. By their own words they appear to have proven otherwise.
Do you also have fairies at the bottom of your garden by any chance?
The only thing that this example of reversed speech proves is that you are an imbecile.
Of course they are your words, you are the one who did the 'translation'. If I was as sad and misguided as you, I could probably interpret this 'reversed speech' to say something else entirely.
I prefer to rely on facts rather than your overactive imagination. Gerry and Kate McCann are entirely innocent.
HUELVA ACID
ingeboorg 1 week ago
@so-called cleverfeller, if one could be dumber n sin, you would certainly be there. Are you really so frakken retarded spiritually that you can't even discern the simplest truth, sheesh the person puts the video up, with BOTH forwards AND reverse speech (at 3 different speeds no less) and so you have ALL the scientific proof, and you still act like a pure dumbasz without even the barest of comprehension...you must be so lacking in knowledge it hurts...
21Trinity7 1 week ago
This creeps me out.
lookintothesky123 1 month ago
What a load of rubbish! Putting into peoples heads that she is dead, means that she may not be noticed if those persons happened to see her at some point down the line - Un reported because she is "dead" so it couldnt be her... You people are too cruel. Suspect the parents all you like i say, but for christ sake dont spout off that she's dead or a sighting may be over looked
dotdotkatie 2 months ago
Look at the faces of her parents.. Ever watched lie to me? Those people can't lie. They give all the signs they killed Maddie.
anoniem04 5 months ago
No one noticed the mother is talking in the past about Maddie? If she was so certain about Maddie being alive, she would talk about her like she ís alive..
anoniem04 5 months ago
@anoniem04 Hey well spotted, that reminds me of Ian Huntley and Maxine Carr when they were interviewed by the press, they spoke about holly wells and Jessica Chapman in past tense before the girls were found.
BOGNORregisSUCKS 2 months ago
wonder if u can send this link to the portugal police
Midnightryder7 8 months ago
battlestar galactica soundtrack from 0:00 to 0:52, nice :D
Morphlett 8 months ago
Good work - def. something to this. Have suspected them right from the start. Something is very sinister here and the abduction story just doesn't add up.
Catandthespoon 8 months ago
backwards speech is the most common thing in the world
x0xtinydancerx0x 9 months ago
4:05 - sounds like Bob Marley
takeuchi40 10 months ago
There needs to more petitions for the case to be re-investigated and these lying fraudsters to be behind bars - child neglecting drunken liars n fraudsters - all the money they made n they're not even her legal guardians anymore and know she's dead - most likely killed her themselves the way they looked so happy and played tennis the next day!
scarletjamable 11 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
It was a Pedophile ring , Goncalo Amaral (PJ Police) set up the Mccanns like he did with Joana Cipriano's mother years earlier.
RUI PEDRO was also stolen by the Pedophile ring. Search for "Madeleine Mccann + Bald Man" on Google
Also check here
pedophileringilluminati blogspot com/2009/10/madeleine-mccann-disappeared-on-evening html
ElleCM2 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It was a Pedophile ring , Goncalo Amaral (PJ Police) set up the Mccanns like he did with Joana Cipriano's mother years earlier.
RUI PEDRO was also stolen by the Pedophile ring. Search for "Madeleine Mccann + Bald Man" on Google
Also check here
pedophileringilluminati blogspot com/2009/10/madeleine-mccann-disappeared-on-evening html
ElleCM2 1 year ago
is the world led to believe this child is still alive and unharmed?
MarcusOfficial 1 year ago
"I seen as involved with this" "My wife says there is no other avenue" "Slay with fists, Madeleine" "My honesty scandalous" - What the H***? What is that supposed to mean???
NinaY76 1 year ago
what aload of bollox
badharvz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
KaOssis is a woman who allowed her partner to inerfere with her own kids while she went shopping.
luckily for them they were taken into care,but how can she comment on anyones parenting skills?
lewiable 1 year ago
You're fitting the sounds to what you want - the sounds are so vague, if one listens to the backward speech without reading your interpretations one could come up with anything. '" It's unbelievable" sounded to me like ...." a Marguerita"...perhaps Kate's favourite cocktail. Personally I believe they know what happened to their child and are covering up, maybe accidental death due to negligence and over medicating. There are so many inconsistenioes - political decision to close the file
linclinc5 1 year ago
Oh well that proves it. They decided to get rid of one of their three kids and cleverly planned a mass media campaign to raise cash for a lavish lifestyle which they couldn't afford on two doctors' salaries alone. It wasn't enough to be earning around $400,000 per year between them. The tempation to escape their $400,000 per year poverty trap was just too great. They couldn't stand the pressuer of that poverty any more so they decided for the less pressurized life of murder and a media spotlight
cleverfeller 1 year ago 11
This has been flagged as spam show
KaOssis allowed her children to be molested by the pedophile she loved,luckily they were taken into the care of the local authorities.
This woman has no right whatsoever to criticize the mccanns for anything.
mrarches 1 year ago
guilty until proven rich and connected...
Floodlezoot 1 year ago 3
guilty until proven innocent
bluewhale18 1 year ago
Apparently, the Pope reckons that condoms 'make things worse' in regards to the AIDS epidemic.
The day I take sex advice from an 82-year-old virgin, is the same day I take parenting advice from Kate and Gerry McCann.
reno573 1 year ago 5
The child died in the apartment.
due to a fall from sofa onto hard floor.
parents found child dead.
father moved the body, mother called the police.
BLOOD DNA evidence in car + flat + teddy.
NO sign of any forced entry. other kids undistrubed.
GUILTY AS SIN.
buganna1 2 years ago 2
You have waaaay too much time on your hands.
dickmarellan 2 years ago
But they're still guilty of wreckless abandonment leading to death.
vikkipollard5 2 years ago 21
That's pretty funny mrarches. I agree.
vikkipollard5 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SKCOLLOB DEKAF
mrarches 2 years ago
We all communicate in a bi-language which originates from the unconscious mind and has been dubbed as reverse speech. If you want to learn about it. See my previous posts on this thread. Do an internet search. Go to my website Backward State. Go to David Oates website Reverse Speech. Otherwise you're just making yourself look silly with each post you make by not backing up your opinion with any facts.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
@mrarches hay arches are you here making a cunt of your self here too,like all vermin you certainley get around
CHANNELOMD 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FAKED BOLLOCKS
mrarches 2 years ago
LOL LOL lol lol lol ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
This takes the fucking biscuit,ive never seen so much crap,funny but crap,surely the poster cant be serious.
mrarches 2 years ago
Far more serious than you may ever be able to comprehend ;)
ShawnHS 2 years ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nice 1,i think its brill how you did it,but i dont agree with the message it sends.
mrarches 2 years ago
I'm not sure what you mean. I found the speech reversals on the McCann's. I haven't manipulated anything to send any type of message. The reversals are the McCann's own words. If the message bothers you, contact the McCann's and ask them about it.
ShawnHS 2 years ago 8
IT DONT BOTHER ME,ITS JUst odd and weird,did you do the reversing or did you find it done somewhere?
mrarches 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
How the fuck can"we would like to say a few words" when said backwards be"slay with fists madeline,i dont think its true.clever but faked.
mrarches 2 years ago
@ShawnHS
well said.
MarcusOfficial 1 year ago
The court in Portimão released a DVD with the police files to those who had requested it .They are now available in the net.Google "The maddie case files".Lots of information the majority of the public has never seen.Pictures, statements given by the mccanns, friends and witnesses to the police (see the discrepancies).It contains also the lab reports and dog's results.See what the filthy british media has been hiding from you.
TheLia82 2 years ago
Whoever have this child please return to her parents
01intan 2 years ago
Its bullshit standards of 'evidence' like this that are partly responsible for most people being skeptical of the proper evidence, e.g. that produced by the sniffer dogs.
The truth is only distorted by this kind of quackery, never helped. Im sure there is more than enough proof out there, speech reversal isnt it...
Wilm0chimp 2 years ago 2
The dogs indicated a dead body was in the apartment. The McCann's reverse speech imply she is dead, so what the heck are you talking about? Secondly I doubt you know anything at all about Reverse Speech to qualify you to make any negative comments about it. If you do, please be specific with your enlightenment.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Someone posted a comment here in regards to micro-expressions and how they're as a tool to detect the truth or lack therefore. further stating reverse speech doesn't have the credentials. I'm paraphrasing because I accidentally hit the "remove" tab instead of "reply. Whoever that was please feel free to re-post.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
My response to that is, determining a micro-expressions meaning is pretty subjective. Whereas the results of reverse speech are available for all to scrutinize as to its accuracy. There are thousands examples of reverse speech available that prove its validity AND accuracy.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
BULLSHIT. It is absolute garbage.
Its another example of information quackery - you are searching for meaningful patterns in random data, its the same nonsense as people who write about the bible code.
Give me a link to a proper scientific study demonstrating reverse speech.
Wilm0chimp 2 years ago
Again what are you talking about. Are you saying you can't hear any of Gerry and Kate's reverse speech? Are you saying that over 60 reversals on them are "patterns in random data"? I wonder what the odds are on that one.
Do your own research!
ShawnHS 2 years ago
What a load of shit. Ive no doubt that Gerry and Kate are directly responsible for maddies death or the cover up of it.
But this is not evidence. Reverse speech has been debunked by the scientific community as pseudoscience, and rightly so.
You are selecting for patterns in huge stretches of audio that have been reversed, and applying your own intepretation to the sounds you hear.
Most of these dont even make any sense, 'Slay with fists, madeline'.
Wilm0chimp 2 years ago
Wilm0chimp,what evidence do u have that gerry and kate are responsible for maddies death,if you have none(which i suspect u aint)please "shut the fuck up"
mrarches 2 years ago
abused child who probably died on the evening of may 2nd, the day before everyone suspects......
sweetness2follow 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Let me first say i believe this man and the evidence is damning. But I don't get is if she did die "accidentally" would the parents take the massive risk of trying to get rid of the body?
Know this is where it gets scary, i believe if it was simply an accident under normal circumstances if the body didnt have daming evidence they would simply go to the police but imo the body may have been abused and held tarces of semon from Jerry or one of the Tapas 9 lot, also maybe high traces of sedatives.
nemeth2009 2 years ago
A friend of the McCanns, Katharine Gaspar, gave a statement to the police after Madeleine was killed, telling them about the time David Payne was describing to Gerry McCann how Madeleine sucked his cock. You can read the full transcript on the mccannfiles . com website. Search for 'david payne' on the site.
Lizaplenty 2 years ago 2
Does any1 no if this is jus coincidence or does it psychologically mean something?
Setiri07 2 years ago
Reverse Speech is a real phenomenon of bi-level communication. EEG test show significant changes when someone hears a speech reversal. In other words, our subconscious minds pick up the on the reversal perfectly.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Well done Shawn, I hope John Oates....or assocciates has reversed the McCann's speech, we may find out one day eh! Something's missing, and MUST be revealed imho.
mumof5granof2 2 years ago 2
As far as I know I have done the most extensive research of the McCann's interviews for reverse speech. I have found over 60 combined reversals of the McCanns which tells a different story than their daughter being abducted. These can be heard on my website Backward State.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
this is total shit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Greig1424 2 years ago
that's very scary. someone must know something. i wish this thing would end and we could find out what happened to her!
Alannah11X 2 years ago 3
Praia De Luz = 'Sacrifice of the 33rd Degree Spinal Bone' = $ = Freemasons Nazi NHS using reverse psychology medical term's like A.D.H.D for Punch & Judy, and Armarna for Panzer!
KaOssis 2 years ago
interesting. So is there a hidden agenda or satanic agenda going on here. Blonde Hair/Blue eyed girl goes missing, innocent girl, no body found.
was she taken for a ritual, a sacrifice. what day was she taken etc?
Praia da luz means 'Bay of Light', right?
TaigaSibirskaya 2 years ago 2
Do you really think that Madeleine would be burried under a bridge being that both parent's and their Tapa Crew were all in the Medical Industry, and everyone of them was involved in REASERCH, especially Ketamine = Anesthesia = "We let her down" = Medical Surgery Theatre Jargon for anesthesisit's, and Jerry's brother John McCann's a traveling sale's rep for a Global Pharmasutical company; so whose trying to kid a Hi$ler!
KaOssis 2 years ago
What the heck do their medical credentials have to do with a reversal from Jerry McCann saying "she's near a trestle"?
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Obviously you don't read enough of a right hemisphere Syn(SINE)aestheis Thesurus Book called a Bible often enough t understand right hemisphere conscious coherence then!
KaOssis 2 years ago
You're so right rudyell!
This video's scaring me to death. especially when they play the lowest pitched voice.
firstconcubine 2 years ago
what a waste of time.
utter rubbish
lyonsdp 2 years ago
I had to stop this video. It gave me the heebeegeebees.
rudyell 2 years ago 2
Good Job
godin007 2 years ago
see 6:51 she's near a trestle and description of what a trestle actually is!!!
uncanny.
gazzaman44 2 years ago 3
Things that make you go hmmm.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
ref near a bridge: quote from message on the help find madeleine mccann video;
sugga (10 months ago) 0
Reply | Spam
Polish clairvoyant Mr Krzysztof Jackowski from Czluchow said that Madeleine has been killed by her parents...Her body is covered with stones under the bridge...I think that police should keep on searching her...
gazzaman44 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
gazzaman44 2 years ago
"I mean I did" How the feck did this woman become a doctor?
loopylou007 2 years ago
Whether or not they were directly involved in this childs death, they are guilty of inexcusable negligence and abuse of their children. They left them night after night unattended! Gave them Paracetamol regularly, which is chemical abuse! Shame on you both, and you both took the Hippocratic oath! Clarence Mitchell is so pompous, arrogant and obnoxious.The McCanns are chillingly suspicious, enjoy the pseudo-celebrity status they have created, and perpetuate the story for their own financial gain
snaebjorn53 2 years ago 5
I have a weird suspicion about the recognition device for their NWO security. If they just bring it in, it,s violation of our privacy. If it's for a little girl with a mark in her eye. (born in vitro maybe the dad never accepted her. Maybe she was a selected gene. Who knows. But their recognition system will flow through because we all still have a heart for kids and elders and such.
godin007 2 years ago
Utter nonsense.
sjbrez 2 years ago
Your unconscious mind does not backmask your thoughts. That's the biggest pile of bullshit I've ever heard, and this is coming from someone who knows a scientologist ¬_¬
ReloadPsi 2 years ago 2
If they want to swim in the river of Denile then let them, I just wish they would shut up or loose thier other kids. THE BRITSIH PEOPLE ARE SICK OF YOU BAD PARENTS
Xear 2 years ago 4
her parents are making us nervous wrecks! and we are searching for nothing??? just a girl who is dead?? i cant belive them!
pachirisu228 2 years ago 2
The documentary the McCanns don't want you to see
Watch the documentary on Youtube:
Senhor Goncalo Amaral - The Truth of the Lie - with English subtitles (PART 1 of 6)
elmobuffy 2 years ago 4
Interesting videos. Their theory is a little off according to Kate's reverse speech. Amaral believes the child died in the apartment and it was accidental. His theory is Madeleine may have climbed on the couch, and fell. By Kate's reversals "Slay with fists, Madeleine." and "only swat her" suggests she was angry when she hit Madeleine accidentally killing her.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
@ShawnHS why all this on going drama from them over the years?..looks like kate is about to have a nervous breakdown..don't they want to lay at least low?
Midnightryder7 8 months ago
MURDERERS !!! MURDERERS !!!
toomanyrocks 2 years ago 6
Shawn, you're right. My comment was made towards the parents in that thye've made some very wild accusations while never taking responsibility for the fact they left their children alone, in harms way.
soma90405 2 years ago
It doesn't matter who killed Maddy if she is in fact dead. Her parents, who were legally and morally bound to do EVERYTHING within their power to protect her failed miserably by leaving her alone in an unlocked apartment in a foreign country at night. Would any of us even do this at home? NO, absolutely not, and as such they are completely responsible, They should be arrested. In the US you can be arrested for leaving a child in a locked car alone - what the the McCanns did was far worse.
soma90405 2 years ago 4
I think it does matter who killed her. According to Kate's speech reversal she did it. Although her reversals seem to indicate it was accidental, I don't know what you call when the parents then cover it up and weave a tale of being victims generating sympathy around the world. It appears the McCann's are politically connected. Perhaps that is how they were able to deflect the investigation. I think Kate sums it up in her reverse speech when she says "But we're still the shield of murder".
ShawnHS 2 years ago
This is brilliant findings in there speech. Have u got any more on the Macanns?
bugsyashton 2 years ago
Over 60 reversals on my website "Backward State". Link is on my You Tube home page.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Stop acting like victims and confess!
adammiller84 2 years ago 2
thats freaky....
guywitpizzaz 2 years ago
Reminds me of The Witchfinder General.
djbethell 2 years ago
Witch Hunter General:
Brutally torturing confessions out of suspected witches.
Reverse Speech Analysis:
Reverse recorded audio to consciously hear messages already perfectly received by ones subconscious mind.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Guilty as can be!!!
SouthSuavest 2 years ago 2
Funny, you allow comments but don't like them when they don't agree with your view-point. Now that is hardly an open-mind. You're playing with real peoples' lives. As they are in the media you seem to forget the person and see them as nothing more than something to judge and rip apart. Your claim I know nothing about RS is more gibberish. I've known about it for about 20 years. I was interested for a while until everything I heard was just the interpretator's transference.
5.34?
djbethell 2 years ago
Your "comments" are baseless. True speech reversals have proven to be 100% accurate over the past 25 years. Therefore it can be said the truth will be found in one's Reverse Speech. In the case of the McCann's I have posted 37 reversals of Kate and 24 of Gerry on my Backward State site. Their combined reversals tell the truth of the story, and it doesn't involve their daughter being abducted. Where a polygraph relies on the opinion of the tester, a reversal is for all to hear objectively.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
"True speech reversals have proven to be 100% accurate over the past 25 years." Facts and figures please? Independent studies please? So accurate that law agencies are using this process? Of course not! Wishing it were true doesn't make it true. All guess work, projection and transference of the listener. 5.34 still not answered. That's just one little example out of so many more I could chose from. The listener will hear what they want to hear. Thankfully this will never be allowed in court.
djbethell 2 years ago
Once again if you've actually had ever done any research on the phenomena you would already know the answers to your questions. Go to David Oates site - Reverse Speech. Go to the "Library - Archived Audio & Video". From there he has dozens of articles. Some of the articles:
RS & its forensic applications
The track record of RS
Some Case Studies
Operation Desert Storm
ShawnHS 2 years ago
I'm well acquainted with David Oates. Most academics in the field of linguistics have not paid attention to Oates' work, and it has been called a pseudoscience.universities and research institutes have refused to test Oates' theories because of a lack of theoretical basis to make his predictions even worth testing, and the fact that many of his claims are untestable, but one of the few scientific experiments to evaluate Oates' claims did not support his findings.
djbethell 2 years ago
From David Oates' site "Frequently Asked Questions";
Is there any academic endorsement of Reverse Speech?
Many individual academics have taken Reverse Speech classes and privately endorse Reverse Speech. However wide spread acceptance of the work has not yet taken place. The Oregon state police have accepted Reverse Speech as an optional extra in there training program. Additionally California State University recently published a paper that found the brain was able to decode speech backwards.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Others have criticized "reverse speech" as lacking a rigorous methodology and not being informed by an understanding of issues in linguistics and characterized Oates as "more interested in making a profit than educating others," pointing out the large amount of merchandise and services his website sells. Reverse speech has been compared to the controversial field of neuro-linguistic programming.
djbethell 2 years ago
It would appear that you are vaguely referencing the article from the Skeptical Inquirer written by Tom Byrne and Mathew Normand called "An Analysis of Reverse Speech, The Demon-Haunted". The well written response to that article can be found on David Oates' site and is called "Our Reply to the Skeptical Inquirer".
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Because of the "dogmatic" tone of Oates' material, reverse speech has been compared to "fringe literature."
Oates' own claims about the applications of reverse speech have also been challenged. One report has questioned whether reverse speech was ever really used in police work, as Oates claimed. His claim that reverse speech has applications in psychology and psychotherapy is not supported by mainstream research in those fields.
djbethell 2 years ago
You're labeling his position as "dogmatic". Is it because he refuses to back down in his rightful stance in the validity and accuracy of Reverse Speech. Who specifically has compared it to "fringe literature"? Which "report" has proof that RS has not been used in police work? Where is your evidence that RS is not supported in psychology and psychotherapy? Would it be those in the field that would have their income reduced by actually helping people in a short period of time instead of years?
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Oates' work has been described as "dangerous" because of its potential for misuse and the likelihood of leading to false accusations of people in criminal courts, similarly to the controversial practice of facilitated communication. The human brain automatically tries to make sense out of any noise as soon as it expects that noise to be a spoken language. The power of suggestion is then used to nudge the listener to hear what the presenter wants them to hear.
djbethell 2 years ago
Your posts are becoming redundant, and you are not backing up your opinion with any specifics let alone facts. Oh, but wait, you're still referencing the article from the Skeptical Inquirer aren't you?
ShawnHS 2 years ago
Comment removed
djbethell 2 years ago
David John Oates almost always tells the listener in advance what they should expect to hear, thereby planting a suggestion that would make the listener more likely to actually "hear" that phrase. A study has shown that when listening to the same clips without being told in advance what to expect, the results have a higher variation. Oates claims that RS has applications in psychotherapy, and criminology. His claims have been rejected by mainstream science and academia. 5.34?
djbethell 2 years ago
You've done nothing to advance your position other than regurgitating garbage from the Skeptical Inquirer. Perhaps it is the only thing you have to hang your hat on to support your personal belief that RS does not exist.
I would imagine there are many people, maybe even yourself, who are made nervous of RS by the idea that the pure honesty of one's true thoughts can be revealed to others on a conscious level by taking their recorded speech and reversing it.
ShawnHS 2 years ago
But where more importantly is your proof? You can't even answer 5:34!!! I've nothing to prove, whereas you do. You can quote David Oates all you like and that's all you quote even about Oregan police; that's one man's voice regurgitating his own unbacked-up personal beliefs. That's not 'specifics' or tested and proven facts, just hot air. Give me proper independent studies and we'll talk but until that time I'm really not here to listen to recycling. It's your page so have the last word. Adios.
djbethell 2 years ago
This guessing game's intolerable. Play this to 10 different people and your get 10 different ideas. This all depends on whether you think they're guilty or not. That's how the interpretations come about. Transfering what's in your head to what you want to hear. Listen without seeing the subtitles and it's rubbish. Hear it with the subtitles and it's still rubbish. Take 5.34 for example; if you can hear "I won't surrender" there, you're just completely trolling. Its drivel. Pretty sad, really.
djbethell 2 years ago
What's sad is someone posting something negative about a subject they know nothing about. Try watching the You Tube video "The reverse speech blind test".
ShawnHS 2 years ago
I listened to the reverse audio (without the video subtitles) and it was complete unintelligible gibberish.
Conclusion:
This is bullshit.
Raul48819 2 years ago 4
this is a sick video to post. Its a load off bullshit and whoever believes this crap is just seriously insane.
liverpoolhill 3 years ago 3
What specifically is "sick"? Does it bother you that the McCann's may be responsible for their daughters disappearance and the ensuing cover up, of which they would then appear to be getting away with it?
Maybe if you actually did a little research on the subject you might qualify as having an opinion on it, but until then I'll have to question who is the one that is full of it!
ShawnHS 3 years ago
I also find it interesting that by their own words the "pattern", the overall analysis of their combined speech reversals, that seems to be as to what actually happened to Madeleine was not an abduction.
ShawnHS 3 years ago
Interesting.. i never thought of this reverse speech picking up unconsciouss patterns. Very nice find.. little scary
M0rrigan1 3 years ago
Why are the Voices of kate and greey reversed the same voice they dont have the same voice when they speak normally so why when they are reversed hmmmmm
victoriaxxneal 3 years ago
when she first went missing they informed sky news then 2 hours later they imformed the police. Why the fuck would you do that if your child had gone missing god i fucking hate her parents they are pure evil filth who don't deserve children
skylinen1 3 years ago
well said Skylinen ,imo maddie was murdered the day before they rang Sky news/Diplomat/Police in that order
flippingflops 3 years ago
its the kidnappers fault an i dont think the parents did anything you no thats probably what the abducter wants you to think that the parents did something to her so the police an people would do more blaming the parents then finding maddie so the abducter would get away with the horrific crime the kidnapper commited dont blame the parents for leaving the kids alone it was a mistake people make mistakes its a fact of life they havent done anything to maddie she was abducted i no it find maddiex
GirlsLovePink08 3 years ago 2
According to the reverse speech analysis of the McCann's, there is nothing to indicate they believe their daughter was abducted. It does reveal something far different. It is not a "fact of life" they had not done anything to their daughter.
ShawnHS 3 years ago
These parent's need locking up !!
A) I would never leave my children, all of whom where under 4 on there own, let alone in a different country while i swan out on wine and food
B) No human being would ever drug children to go to sleep...period!!!
C) Just because they are DR's doesnt mean there behaviour is acceptable.
D) They met the POPE, famous popstars/actors, flew all round the world with their story, million flying around etc..
winston200789 3 years ago
Paul is dead!
Raul48819 3 years ago 3
Haven't heard that one before!LMAO
Obviously you're referring to The Beatles when they intentionally put words into some of their songs backwards, so that when a record was played backwards they could be heard. This is known as backmasking, and has nothing to do with the natural phenomena of Reverse Speech!
ShawnHS 3 years ago
Very interesting, thank you!
wytchypoo 3 years ago
Of all the totally ridiculous and laughable anti-McCann theories or 'evidence' I've encountered, this is the most ridiculous and laughable of them all. Some people really will believe in any old rubbish!
mattybaldy 3 years ago 2
Absolutely agree with you, what a load of total nonsense.
navymanuk 3 years ago 2
This video represents a small sample of the McCann's speech reversals. The rest can be heard at my Backward State web site. These are their words, not mine nor anyone else. Therefore how can it be "anti-McCann"?
Reverse Speech was discovered over 25 yrs. ago and has proven to be 100% accurate. Whether you want to believe it or not is irrelevant!
The McCann's speech reversals could just as easily prove their innocence. By their own words they appear to have proven otherwise.
ShawnHS 3 years ago
Do you also have fairies at the bottom of your garden by any chance?
The only thing that this example of reversed speech proves is that you are an imbecile.
Of course they are your words, you are the one who did the 'translation'. If I was as sad and misguided as you, I could probably interpret this 'reversed speech' to say something else entirely.
I prefer to rely on facts rather than your overactive imagination. Gerry and Kate McCann are entirely innocent.
mattybaldy 3 years ago 2
Your ignorance is showing.
Try checking out the You Tube video entitled:
The Reverse Speech Blind Test
ShawnHS 3 years ago
Go to the police with this , you may have a new lead!!♥ Ohh poor poor Madeleine, if this is found to be true.
MadelineWillComeHome 3 years ago
kate is scary just look into her eyes there is nothing.
viciazzo 3 years ago
exactly,you'd think a mother of three whos child has just been kidnapped would shed a tear or two..hn
KyuChaaan 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
shes never shed one single tear ,shes a disgrace ,may she rot in hell
flippingflops 3 years ago
..mhmm
KyuChaaan 3 years ago
mhmm ?
flippingflops 3 years ago
heh,sorry. let em try the response again " yup,your right "
KyuChaaan 3 years ago
of course im right !!im flippingflops !!! lol
flippingflops 3 years ago
-laughs-
KyuChaaan 3 years ago
She's near a trestle? I found this quite disturbing...
ellajo1209 3 years ago 6
well investigated
hellokitty12394 3 years ago 11
they are liers, all 9 of them know what happened.
bign3ck 3 years ago 5