"He has feet with a level sole (Pali: supati thapado). Note: "feet with level tread,/ so that he places his foot evenly on the ground,/ lifts it evenly,/ and touches the ground evenly with the entire sole." (Lakkhana Sutta) - from wikipedia ; the first of the 32 great signs of a man listed by Shakyamuni - Scion of the Shakya Clan
@sharmax7 he was born in modern Nepal, but he was born into a high caste Hindu Kshatriya so he was very much an "Indian". And his small kingdom was in both modern India and Nepal.
@JacobTheIndoAmerican no you wrong. Buddha was not Hindu Aryan. Buddha was Mongoloid in race. He was from Shakya family, Mongoloid race. Mongoloid are called Kirat in ancient Hindu texts. Still today Kiratas live in Nepal. check this video--> "sakela, the greatest festival of Kirat people"
this festival was onced suppressed by Hindu Kings. It was only officially recognized in 2002 after overthrowing Nepal Hindu King. The indigenous Nepalese are all Mongoloid race.
@diliprai Nope, he was a high caste in the Hindu faith.He was also a part of the Shakya clan, who were apart of the solar race.King Janamejaya was also apart of the solar race. Ikshvaku was the first king of the Ikshvaku dynasty and founder of the Solar Dynasty of Kshatriyas in Vedic civilization in ancient India..Mahavamsa traces the origin of the Sakyas (Śākyas) to king Okkaka (Ikshvaku). These people were high caste in the caste system, no Mongoloid.
JacobTheIndoAmerican don’t just assume he was Hindu Aryan race. Now Shakya and Koliya (clans of the Father and Mother of Buddha) were Mongoloid. The Sutta Lakkhana (Buddhist scripture) well describes Buddha as the "yellow-skinned men".
@JacobTheIndoAmerican In that time the Himalayas region was populated by Mongoloid race and were segregated into 5 groups: Kiratas, Vajji, Malla, Shakya and Koliya, however, these kingdoms were very close and maintained excellent relationships because they were all brothers Mongoloid. The Aryan invasion broke this harmony and sentenced to inequality. Watch this video for facts --> "4.-Shakyamuni Buddha...Revolucionario Inédito (Segunda Parte del Episodio II) "
@diliprai This is not true, Indians have been there for 60,000 years.In a 2009 study of 132 individuals, 560,000 SNPs in 25 different Indian groups were analyzed, providing strong evidence in support of the notion that modern Indians are a hybrid population descending from two pre-historic, genetically divergent populations, one of which, referred to as the 'Ancestral North Indians', aged 40.000 years and the other, called the 'Ancestral South Indians', aged 60.000 years.
@diliprai The intermingling of ANI's and ASI's happened in the same period as the ANI's first appeared, 40.000 years ago. Buddha was described as "golden colored" not yellow. And he was said to have blue eyes. He was part of the solar linage which were very much Indians. He was also a high caste Hindu of birth, which caste system did not allow Mongoloids, because they thought they were inferior.
@JacobTheIndoAmerican you do not know son. but i suggest you come to Nepal and see Shakya community yourself to believe it. "Indians have been there for 60,000 years" ....LOL you mean Indians are dinosaurs. Only dinosaurs live around that time. Also you are only telling me from Veda, which was written by Aryan themselves. Read Buddha scriptures as well my son.
And yeah check this video--> "Sakela~the greatest festival of Kirat people"
@diliprai Are you slow? "Only dinosaurs live around that time." 60,000 years ago? Only dinosaur are crocodiles and modern raptors(birds).I didnt say from vedas, Lol!This is modern data.How can vedas know anything that happened 60,000-40,000 years ago? ANI Ancestral North Indians has been there sense, 40,000 years ago. ASI Ancestral South Indians have been in India sense 60,000 years ago.Modern Indians are mutts of these people.
@diliprai Buddha is from a high caste hindu family, from a solar linage. It doesnt matter what they look like know. Like the Gurkhas say they are from a rajput linage, but look nothing like them. Many people would want to be connected to the Shakyas heritage. Caste system back then thought the Mongoloids as inferior people. Buddhas was born from a Hindu family, from a high caste lineage. =)
@JacobTheIndoAmerican well that's coming out from your mouth. It was Aryan Brahmins who destroy Buddhism in India. But in Nepal Buddhism survived because of Mongoloid race. And yeah Buddhism spread far and wide among Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Vietnamese, Korean who are all Mongoloid race.
Buddhism and Buddha was absorbed into Hindusim in later date by the Aryan to protect their culture from becoming minority. Very smart. Well the scholars and historian have already dug out all the facts.
@JacobTheIndoAmerican Along with Buddhism, Sivaism was also absorbed into Hindusim by Aryan. There is never a mention of Siva or worshiping of linga(phallus stone) in RigVeda the oldest vedic book. There is also never mention of Buddha in RigVeda. Still cannot believe,
watch this video---> "Kirat Temple" in Nepal
My son only truth is coming out now because we kicked out Hindu King who suppressed indigenous Mongoloid Nepalese for over 240+ years.
@diliprai "There is also never mention of Buddha in RigVeda" Rig Vedas was created around 1700 BC, Buddha around 500 BC. So thats pretty baseless, and so are the other things you are saying :-)
@JacobTheIndoAmerican exactly that's why Aryan later absorbed Buddhism as part of vedic culture aka Hinduism. Buddhism was a great danger to Hinduism. When Aryan emphasized caste system in Hinduism, Buddhism caters towards all race and did not allowed animal to be slaughtered unlike Hindusim. To protect people from leaving Buddhism, the Aryan Brahmins cleverly put Buddha as one of their own.
If you come to Nepal, you also see ppl of Iranian/Pakistanis looks. where did these people came from?
@diliprai "Buddhism was a great danger to Hinduism" Nope, it grow side by side with Hinduism, Jainism, etc. Many Indian empires were Buddhist and many emperors came from Hinduism to Buddhism like Mauryans, Guptas, Palas, etc,etc. It wasnt until Islamic invasion Buddhism was felt a huge decline in India.Majority of the things you are saying is baseless."If you come to Nepal, you also see ppl of Iranian/Pakistanis looks." I have already said, they are came 40,000 years ago.
@JacobTheIndoAmerican these Aryan(people of Iranian/Pakistanis/Afghanis) looks was aresult of Aryan invasion. The Himalayas region is even recorded as Kiratdesh or Land of Kiratas in Veda and other ancient texts. Kirat means Mongoloid race.
The term Nepal came to exist from 4th BCE. The Neolithic tools found in Nepal also proved that Mongoloid race have been living here for past 10,000 years.
So son accept the fact. Nepal was never a Hindu nation.
@diliprai Nepal is a Hindu nation know that is what I mean. "Neolithic tools found in Nepal also proved that Mongoloid race have been living here for past 10,000 years." This doesnt porve nothing, but some people have been making tools, any skulls?I said ANI have been dated to be migrates to India 40,000 years ago.No surprise they have been in Nepal.
@JacobTheIndoAmerican the oldest Mongoloid skull is found in China. Nickname "Peking Man" it is believed to be between 500,000 ---750,000 years old. So you don't have to a rocket scientist to know the extent of distributions of Mongoloid race. Nepal being closer to China, Thailand, Tibet of course Mongoloid race settled in Himalayas first. The Aryan invasion resulted in people of middle-eastern to be in Nepal. And yeah they are strictly Hindus and practiced caste system.
@diliprai I am sorry, do you know what you are talking about? "Peking Man" isn't even Homo sapien. Homo sapiens are only 200,000 some years old. Humans moved out of Africa 70,000 years ago. You are making yourself seem more and more baseless and have no creditability with me. Aryan invasion is theory and a not so good one matter a fact.Theorized from British man that wasnt so "fond" of Indias culture and people ;-)
@JacobTheIndoAmerican don't worry son. Tide is turning. Nepal Mongoloid race is awaken. The Mongoloid race in Nepal have been discriminated in running of Nepal. Mongoloid culture-language and their religion was suppressed before. Nepal as a failure state is attributed to Hindu Aryan rulers who practiced caste system, corruption and nepotism. It's matter of time before Mongoloid in Nepal take back their land from Hindu Aryan. Already the Nepal Hindu King is booted out. So good nite.
@diliprai I believe you do not know what you are talking about. From dinosaurs in 60,000, Peking man garbage,etc, etc, etc are totally baseless. ANI are 40,000 years old and ASI 60,000 years old. And modern Indians mix of these.No surprise they have been in Nepal. I am thinking your pulling garbage from you ass to make your conclusion true, which is, because mostly every thing you said is completely baseless. Its been fun talking to someone that doesn't even know what they're talking about =)
@JacobTheIndoAmerican oh yeah typo error. The Peking man is around 50,000-75,000 years. Period.
Lastly i urged ppl following our comments to watch this video--> "Sakela~the Greatest festival of Kirat People" in Nepal.
This festival was only recognized in 2002. Before it was suppressed by Hindu Aryan King. Buddha was born during Kirat dynasty and he came to Kathmandu valley during the rule of 7th Kirati King. But in Nepal, this was hidden by Hindu Aryan King. Email me and i give you more info.
@diliprai baseless man goes at it again. Peking man is 50,000-75,000 but 680,000-780,000 years old. And not even a homo sapiens, but was apart of the Homo erectus family. XD ROFL. Oh man you have no clue what you talking about. Bye =)
@diliprai Did you just reply to like a 9 month old conversation? Yes, China was the first to cultivate rice. I know. Wheat was cultivated first in the Fertile Crescent, and Corn in the South America.
You realize you are taking credit for China right? Wheat and Corn are equally important.
No one would "eat mud". Thats the dumbest shit I have ever heard..
@JacobTheIndoAmerican yeah chinese domistacted rice and miilets. kiratas, native of the himalayas used to meet chinese at yangtze valley for trade, business and culture. the kiratas introudced the rice, millets and pigs in the himalayas regions of nepal, assam, sikkim, maniopur, nagaland.
later the kiratas living at the foothills of the himalalays introduced rice and millets to early indians living in the plains of indian sub-continent. wacth the documentary and learn something new today.
@diliprai Ok, I thank the Chinese for cultivating rice. I already know this. And the people of the Fertile crecent, and the indigenous people in South America for wheat and corn.
And no, I am not going to watch your shitty video. 9 month old conversation, LMAO.. Always trying to make yourself feel a little better.
@JacobTheIndoAmerican no need for foul language, and losing your cool. I suggest you read up on some Netiquette guidelines before you post anything online. :P
@diliprai The oldest term Aryan comes from Rig Vedas. Aryan isnt a racial term,in Rig Vedas, any one that doesn't belong to the Vedic culture are not "Arya".Vedic people thought of the Iranian(Other Middle easterners also),Chinese,Greeks,etc as inferiors and not "Arya"(Aryan). Aryan means in the RigVedas as people that are noble,honest,etc. Like the modern word Gentlemen
@diliprai There was not no mass murder of non-Hindu people like Arabs did to pre-Islamic middle east and N. Africa. Or pre-Christian Pagan religions in Europe. Buddhism wouldn't get his far if there wasn't tolerance. Like when the Romans adopted Christianity, it spread in a fast rate all over Europe.
@diliprai Buddhism decline was started in the Islamic invasion, who destoryed nalanda? Ashoka the Great spread Buddhism to far flung places.With out him we would not know anything Buddha either. And you forgot Sri Lanka and South East Asia. Buddhism grew side by side with Jainism,Hinduism,and other pagan religions. "Buddhism and Buddha was absorbed into Hindusim in later date by the Aryan to protect their culture from becoming minority." I am sorry, but his doesnt make sense.
kapilmuni was from kapilavastu before siddharth gautama buddha,shakya caste of buddha still exist in nepal yet but neither nepal or india was called from it's present name.
"He has feet with a level sole (Pali: supati thapado). Note: "feet with level tread,/ so that he places his foot evenly on the ground,/ lifts it evenly,/ and touches the ground evenly with the entire sole." (Lakkhana Sutta) - from wikipedia ; the first of the 32 great signs of a man listed by Shakyamuni - Scion of the Shakya Clan
dilkashh 2 months ago
Shakyamuni Buddha was born in Nepal
MsPapameow 7 months ago
Kapilvastu is in Nepal not in India
MsPapameow 7 months ago
Thanks for uploading something with english sub :)
Is this a Japanese anime, but dubbed in Chinese?
dearest88 1 year ago
@dearest88
Yes this is what I think.
joshoadrian 1 year ago
NEPAL is never a part of india.......n Buddha was born in kapilvastu, NEPAL...
sharmax7 1 year ago
@sharmax7 he was born in modern Nepal, but he was born into a high caste Hindu Kshatriya so he was very much an "Indian". And his small kingdom was in both modern India and Nepal.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican no you wrong. Buddha was not Hindu Aryan. Buddha was Mongoloid in race. He was from Shakya family, Mongoloid race. Mongoloid are called Kirat in ancient Hindu texts. Still today Kiratas live in Nepal. check this video--> "sakela, the greatest festival of Kirat people"
this festival was onced suppressed by Hindu Kings. It was only officially recognized in 2002 after overthrowing Nepal Hindu King. The indigenous Nepalese are all Mongoloid race.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai Nope, he was a high caste in the Hindu faith.He was also a part of the Shakya clan, who were apart of the solar race.King Janamejaya was also apart of the solar race. Ikshvaku was the first king of the Ikshvaku dynasty and founder of the Solar Dynasty of Kshatriyas in Vedic civilization in ancient India..Mahavamsa traces the origin of the Sakyas (Śākyas) to king Okkaka (Ikshvaku). These people were high caste in the caste system, no Mongoloid.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
JacobTheIndoAmerican don’t just assume he was Hindu Aryan race. Now Shakya and Koliya (clans of the Father and Mother of Buddha) were Mongoloid. The Sutta Lakkhana (Buddhist scripture) well describes Buddha as the "yellow-skinned men".
diliprai 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican In that time the Himalayas region was populated by Mongoloid race and were segregated into 5 groups: Kiratas, Vajji, Malla, Shakya and Koliya, however, these kingdoms were very close and maintained excellent relationships because they were all brothers Mongoloid. The Aryan invasion broke this harmony and sentenced to inequality. Watch this video for facts --> "4.-Shakyamuni Buddha...Revolucionario Inédito (Segunda Parte del Episodio II) "
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai This is not true, Indians have been there for 60,000 years.In a 2009 study of 132 individuals, 560,000 SNPs in 25 different Indian groups were analyzed, providing strong evidence in support of the notion that modern Indians are a hybrid population descending from two pre-historic, genetically divergent populations, one of which, referred to as the 'Ancestral North Indians', aged 40.000 years and the other, called the 'Ancestral South Indians', aged 60.000 years.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@diliprai The intermingling of ANI's and ASI's happened in the same period as the ANI's first appeared, 40.000 years ago. Buddha was described as "golden colored" not yellow. And he was said to have blue eyes. He was part of the solar linage which were very much Indians. He was also a high caste Hindu of birth, which caste system did not allow Mongoloids, because they thought they were inferior.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@diliprai So your idea of Indians coming in very recently to the Indian subcontinent, is false.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican you do not know son. but i suggest you come to Nepal and see Shakya community yourself to believe it. "Indians have been there for 60,000 years" ....LOL you mean Indians are dinosaurs. Only dinosaurs live around that time. Also you are only telling me from Veda, which was written by Aryan themselves. Read Buddha scriptures as well my son.
And yeah check this video--> "Sakela~the greatest festival of Kirat people"
and tell me if they look Aryan or Mongoloid.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai Are you slow? "Only dinosaurs live around that time." 60,000 years ago? Only dinosaur are crocodiles and modern raptors(birds).I didnt say from vedas, Lol!This is modern data.How can vedas know anything that happened 60,000-40,000 years ago? ANI Ancestral North Indians has been there sense, 40,000 years ago. ASI Ancestral South Indians have been in India sense 60,000 years ago.Modern Indians are mutts of these people.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@diliprai Buddha is from a high caste hindu family, from a solar linage. It doesnt matter what they look like know. Like the Gurkhas say they are from a rajput linage, but look nothing like them. Many people would want to be connected to the Shakyas heritage. Caste system back then thought the Mongoloids as inferior people. Buddhas was born from a Hindu family, from a high caste lineage. =)
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican well that's coming out from your mouth. It was Aryan Brahmins who destroy Buddhism in India. But in Nepal Buddhism survived because of Mongoloid race. And yeah Buddhism spread far and wide among Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Vietnamese, Korean who are all Mongoloid race.
Buddhism and Buddha was absorbed into Hindusim in later date by the Aryan to protect their culture from becoming minority. Very smart. Well the scholars and historian have already dug out all the facts.
diliprai 1 year ago
Comment removed
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican Along with Buddhism, Sivaism was also absorbed into Hindusim by Aryan. There is never a mention of Siva or worshiping of linga(phallus stone) in RigVeda the oldest vedic book. There is also never mention of Buddha in RigVeda. Still cannot believe,
watch this video---> "Kirat Temple" in Nepal
My son only truth is coming out now because we kicked out Hindu King who suppressed indigenous Mongoloid Nepalese for over 240+ years.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai "There is also never mention of Buddha in RigVeda" Rig Vedas was created around 1700 BC, Buddha around 500 BC. So thats pretty baseless, and so are the other things you are saying :-)
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican exactly that's why Aryan later absorbed Buddhism as part of vedic culture aka Hinduism. Buddhism was a great danger to Hinduism. When Aryan emphasized caste system in Hinduism, Buddhism caters towards all race and did not allowed animal to be slaughtered unlike Hindusim. To protect people from leaving Buddhism, the Aryan Brahmins cleverly put Buddha as one of their own.
If you come to Nepal, you also see ppl of Iranian/Pakistanis looks. where did these people came from?
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai "Buddhism was a great danger to Hinduism" Nope, it grow side by side with Hinduism, Jainism, etc. Many Indian empires were Buddhist and many emperors came from Hinduism to Buddhism like Mauryans, Guptas, Palas, etc,etc. It wasnt until Islamic invasion Buddhism was felt a huge decline in India.Majority of the things you are saying is baseless."If you come to Nepal, you also see ppl of Iranian/Pakistanis looks." I have already said, they are came 40,000 years ago.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican these Aryan(people of Iranian/Pakistanis/Afghanis) looks was aresult of Aryan invasion. The Himalayas region is even recorded as Kiratdesh or Land of Kiratas in Veda and other ancient texts. Kirat means Mongoloid race.
The term Nepal came to exist from 4th BCE. The Neolithic tools found in Nepal also proved that Mongoloid race have been living here for past 10,000 years.
So son accept the fact. Nepal was never a Hindu nation.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai Nepal is a Hindu nation know that is what I mean. "Neolithic tools found in Nepal also proved that Mongoloid race have been living here for past 10,000 years." This doesnt porve nothing, but some people have been making tools, any skulls?I said ANI have been dated to be migrates to India 40,000 years ago.No surprise they have been in Nepal.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican the oldest Mongoloid skull is found in China. Nickname "Peking Man" it is believed to be between 500,000 ---750,000 years old. So you don't have to a rocket scientist to know the extent of distributions of Mongoloid race. Nepal being closer to China, Thailand, Tibet of course Mongoloid race settled in Himalayas first. The Aryan invasion resulted in people of middle-eastern to be in Nepal. And yeah they are strictly Hindus and practiced caste system.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai I am sorry, do you know what you are talking about? "Peking Man" isn't even Homo sapien. Homo sapiens are only 200,000 some years old. Humans moved out of Africa 70,000 years ago. You are making yourself seem more and more baseless and have no creditability with me. Aryan invasion is theory and a not so good one matter a fact.Theorized from British man that wasnt so "fond" of Indias culture and people ;-)
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican don't worry son. Tide is turning. Nepal Mongoloid race is awaken. The Mongoloid race in Nepal have been discriminated in running of Nepal. Mongoloid culture-language and their religion was suppressed before. Nepal as a failure state is attributed to Hindu Aryan rulers who practiced caste system, corruption and nepotism. It's matter of time before Mongoloid in Nepal take back their land from Hindu Aryan. Already the Nepal Hindu King is booted out. So good nite.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai So you keep making you things up about Peking man and dinosaurs in the 60,000 ok? Try to make it a little beliveable for me next time. =)
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@diliprai I believe you do not know what you are talking about. From dinosaurs in 60,000, Peking man garbage,etc, etc, etc are totally baseless. ANI are 40,000 years old and ASI 60,000 years old. And modern Indians mix of these.No surprise they have been in Nepal. I am thinking your pulling garbage from you ass to make your conclusion true, which is, because mostly every thing you said is completely baseless. Its been fun talking to someone that doesn't even know what they're talking about =)
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican oh yeah typo error. The Peking man is around 50,000-75,000 years. Period.
Lastly i urged ppl following our comments to watch this video--> "Sakela~the Greatest festival of Kirat People" in Nepal.
This festival was only recognized in 2002. Before it was suppressed by Hindu Aryan King. Buddha was born during Kirat dynasty and he came to Kathmandu valley during the rule of 7th Kirati King. But in Nepal, this was hidden by Hindu Aryan King. Email me and i give you more info.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai baseless man goes at it again. Peking man is 50,000-75,000 but 680,000-780,000 years old. And not even a homo sapiens, but was apart of the Homo erectus family. XD ROFL. Oh man you have no clue what you talking about. Bye =)
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican my friend china and nepal also taught india how to cultivate rice. beside rice, nepal introduce millet and pig to india.
watch this documentary --> chapani le chan chan:Story of Rice-N-Millet in the Himalayas
and you realize that for without Nepal, Indians would today be eating mud.
diliprai 9 months ago
@diliprai Did you just reply to like a 9 month old conversation? Yes, China was the first to cultivate rice. I know. Wheat was cultivated first in the Fertile Crescent, and Corn in the South America.
You realize you are taking credit for China right? Wheat and Corn are equally important.
No one would "eat mud". Thats the dumbest shit I have ever heard..
JacobTheIndoAmerican 9 months ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican yeah chinese domistacted rice and miilets. kiratas, native of the himalayas used to meet chinese at yangtze valley for trade, business and culture. the kiratas introudced the rice, millets and pigs in the himalayas regions of nepal, assam, sikkim, maniopur, nagaland.
later the kiratas living at the foothills of the himalalays introduced rice and millets to early indians living in the plains of indian sub-continent. wacth the documentary and learn something new today.
diliprai 9 months ago
@diliprai Ok, I thank the Chinese for cultivating rice. I already know this. And the people of the Fertile crecent, and the indigenous people in South America for wheat and corn.
And no, I am not going to watch your shitty video. 9 month old conversation, LMAO.. Always trying to make yourself feel a little better.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 9 months ago
@JacobTheIndoAmerican no need for foul language, and losing your cool. I suggest you read up on some Netiquette guidelines before you post anything online. :P
TheAstroChild 6 months ago
@diliprai The oldest term Aryan comes from Rig Vedas. Aryan isnt a racial term,in Rig Vedas, any one that doesn't belong to the Vedic culture are not "Arya".Vedic people thought of the Iranian(Other Middle easterners also),Chinese,Greeks,etc as inferiors and not "Arya"(Aryan). Aryan means in the RigVedas as people that are noble,honest,etc. Like the modern word Gentlemen
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@diliprai There was not no mass murder of non-Hindu people like Arabs did to pre-Islamic middle east and N. Africa. Or pre-Christian Pagan religions in Europe. Buddhism wouldn't get his far if there wasn't tolerance. Like when the Romans adopted Christianity, it spread in a fast rate all over Europe.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@diliprai Nepal is majority Hindu state. Buddhism also survived in India, barely. Sri Lanka was the one that kept it alive in South Asia.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@diliprai Buddhism decline was started in the Islamic invasion, who destoryed nalanda? Ashoka the Great spread Buddhism to far flung places.With out him we would not know anything Buddha either. And you forgot Sri Lanka and South East Asia. Buddhism grew side by side with Jainism,Hinduism,and other pagan religions. "Buddhism and Buddha was absorbed into Hindusim in later date by the Aryan to protect their culture from becoming minority." I am sorry, but his doesnt make sense.
JacobTheIndoAmerican 1 year ago
@cheko911 I was not there
@qws yes, animation
joshoadrian 3 years ago
Japanese animation?
qws10055 3 years ago
Yes but was translated and dubbed in Chinese audio and subtitles.
jacobay 2 years ago
The Prince was not crying when He was born like an ordinary baby.
It's correct. There was not even India, but there was Jamputhipa which included present India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afganistan.
Laowest 3 years ago 2
were you there?
cheko911 3 years ago
on the time of Shakyamuni there was no Nepal and kapilavastu was in an Indian state.but nowadays, it is indeed situated in Nepal.
joshoadrian 3 years ago
were you there?
cheko911 3 years ago
who said Kapilvastu is in India?
joshoadrian 3 years ago
Kapilvastu is in nepal dude not in india
9846058330 3 years ago
kapilmuni was from kapilavastu before siddharth gautama buddha,shakya caste of buddha still exist in nepal yet but neither nepal or india was called from it's present name.
dorjetharu 3 years ago
At that time nepal was still part of Great India
jacobay 2 years ago