All the vids I have seen on Ka 52 compare to the AH64LB. Now I know that dissing USA is all the rage these days, but do you think you might compare with a weapon thats not almost 30 years old? Im glad to see that Russia is coming up in the world, but our new Helos and planes don't even need pilots, and can be stamped out en mass. Its like comparing the Su 34 to the F-4 Phantom. As usual, 30 years too late. Im not saying the KA isn't awsome, but it dosn't mean USA sucks.
@Jerimiah10 Maybe you have no idea when the AH64 was build. And the KA50 and KA52 are only heavy ground attack helicopter not Air and ground defense helicopters like AH64 or Mi-28. And the armor of AH64 is just average like the Mi-24.The russian took the armor from the Su-25 for the KA-50 and KA-52, the armor of Su-25 is best armored jet this is confirmed by all countries.It can hold 40mm explosive shells and 80mm rpg rounds. AH64 can hold 23mm.Mi-28 can hold 23mm till 30mm litle more than AH64
@Talshet , @Jerimiah10 that is what US fanboys do all the time they think they are so good because they fight against a opponent who got stuff that is 10-30 years older than their own US stuff. You think you are awesome because they can shoot down with their jets a other who got no radar and you wonder why you win that? but look at your f4 how the fuckt up in Vietnam against the simple MIG. The Ah64 LB is a HGAC and no anti air... the KA 52 is able do handle both things.
@videogames73 ahw talk about you? Really that will say where I came from? But ok I will tell you when you can find the city where this guy was born: Boris Becker. This is the same City I was born and so you know where I am from.
And for the AH64 LB, most of the infantry carry gun 12,7mm heavy MG can do damage to this Chopper. And that is only a infantry gun, when the LB is under attack from a ZU-23-2 he will be dead soon but most of them are to far away for the range of a ZU-23-2
@Vanadium Son, I didn't call you a red, put that small little Asian cock into your pants, we ain't talking to you.
It doesn't matter who has the better weapon, it matters who will pull the trigger first. That's why nuclear war is a close to no chance of happening in this century.
@videogames73 haha, the fuck is it. Without German tech the US only got airplanes and some Guns but not the heavy ones. Check out what the M1 do without German tech. And ohh I forget the Nuke Bombs are German tech too. Pull the Tiger first? Only for Nuclear war. History show you what happens when you pull the trigger first.
@Vanadium That isn't really fair to say, because the United States' society is a mix of just about all races and cultures. Saying it was just made of German tech is kind of like saying that the first British tank was created by the Spanish. All races are created by man. We all come from one man, and one woman. The difference is just many adaptions. All Russians, Europeans, Americans, Asians and Africans are all humans traced back to two humans. It matters who pulls any trigger. A gun is bad too.
@videogames73 Are you trying to say that the yanks WOULDN'T have used nukes if the Russians hadn't armed their adversaries ? For fucks sake, there have been several yank generals WANTED to use nukes against Koreans, Vietnamese and even China for God's sake. Starting with that nutcase McArthur, Curtis LeMay - etc etc etc
@PhilK5100 We don't want to nuke them. Where did that come from, cold war propaganda or something? We wish our ancestors didn't use our nukes, but I guess it was best for us, because we would have gained more casualties. McArthur was a crazy man who profited off of fear. Are you going to tell me that the reds have NEVER had such a crazy man in your civilization? Do you forget how your people would kill jews for lulz? No one is great, We threatened China but reds threatened us. Fear is key.
@videogames73 Look pal, I dunno if your head is in the sand, or up your arse, but you haven't a clue about your own military history. Have alook on google. There'll be a few wanting to mention it. Mention LeMay and McArthur. But theres a few more who wanted it.
Kennedy had all sorts of problems keeping the nuke 'em hawks in line.
But - you're as bad as a muslim revisionist, or an american-irish catholic - ignore truth because its inconvenient.
everybody here is an expert on this shit. I think you should sit back , relax, have a beer, enjoy the technology... Let's hope we don't get to see these machines in use. PS ... Only in a Call of Duty ...
@dima1978 Chechen rebels did see this monster attacking them, they were hiding up in the high mountains once where no tail rotor helicopter could go, and thought they were safe, until they were attacked by a Kamov
Golly :) You'd have to be an idiot to stil wana dog Russia!! Holy hell, this chopper is sick and alongside the other kick ass Havoc and even the Hind there's just nothing like em. Designed for doomsday WW3 and perform like it too - well thats all you can ask and the Russians have done it. Also love that new Pak Fa design - and this all happened this year with latest modifications - outfuckinstanding XD
its Sound Rocks xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
lol. mercanaries calm down man. the comment was not directed to attack any other country. he was just trying to correct someone. Im sure japan, russia and germany has a lot of good technology there
@75426168 Russland braucht sein Militär nicht mit Designs zu verschönern, die Fähigkeiten dieser Maschinen sind viel wichtiger als das Aussehen und gerade deswegen lieben viele Menschen russische Militärtechnik.
But your silly comment pretty much says you got no clue about what are you talking at all...
AH-64 'Apache' is the project finished in the 70ies... Yep... The seventies... And still it's one of the best(probably THE best) attack helicopter yet made...
So... Please... Don't talk random about things you don't know much about...
@videogames73 If the US tries to be clever with the Russkis, they'd get a nasty surprise. Its one thing taking on a bunch of Pakis and Arabs in Afghanistan (and even a few Afghans !), quite another taking on Russians. While American hardware is great, it also requires ridiculous backup, and has far too many showboating pricks piloting them - evidence is the disgusting amount of friendly fire deaths from the Yanks.
@PhilK5100 Hahaha, you call us Yanks, and we call Brits Yanks...Funny. Any how, we are each brought up through propaganda. You have been told that friendly fire happens often. That is not true. In fact, that is very rare, excluding Vietnam. The average friendly fire kill rate is roughly 2%. If you are going to tell me your army doesn't do the same, you are a liar. You are also told that "showboating pricks" are most of our pilots. That is not true. In fact, most pilots are very professional.
@videogames73 The term "yank" began when the original Dutch of New Amsterdam invented their own version of the British "John Bull" and called him "Jan Kies" the British therefore called them all "Jan Kies" = "Yankees" - hardly insulting.
And since when have the Brits been called "Yanks" ? Limeys, Poms, and various others, few complimentary. But thats nicknames for you.
And friendly fire does happen often. More often with American forces than others .
@videogames73 The Americans were arming fanatical muslim extremists with the latest weapons, and even had advisors in Afghanistan doing it.
THATS why the Russians got out (Hardly "ran away"") The Russians AREN'T arming the Taliban. Thats the difference.
Then the weapons and money yanks gave the Afghani extremists (who were mainly Arab and Pakistani as now) were turned on other countries, and the money went to pay for attacks on American targets.
@PhilK5100 Cool 2 comments bro. Anyhow, let me get this straight, you reds can arm the Vietnamese and the Koreans, but if we dare try to play your game with the Afgans, we are doing the wrong thing? Yep, perfect argument. I see why your government(s) haven't lasted longer than 1 third of ours since the 1900s. Too tough? It's ok.
Stereotypical names are passed around all over with different meanings. Some people call Russians AND Germans reds. We call brits yanks, others dont. We arent all alike.
@videogames73 They have every reason to get angry about American double standards - note that even the Americans never try to accuse Russia for arming muslim extremists like THEY did ?
@PhilK5100 So, you're saying that classic Korean "I NUKE YOU BECRUS I CAHN" attitude wouldn't have been obtained if the reds didn't arm them for a civil war? Because ever since, they sure are trying to look feisty. And to my man, Kim Jong IL, Good night sweet prince! And yes, we blamed you for their attitude, but i'm sure when someone nukes someone else, that nuclear deterrence would kill us all. Cheers my friend, because we're all gonna die! Great job stealing our nuke idea, it worked so well!
Only one thing you are forgetting, the Ka-52 is untested for length of service and battle time. The numbers are fine but don't mean anything until it is has been tested. Too many superior designs have looked great on the boards but failed in battle. Give it a few years and let the Chinese come north maybe, and then compare them again...lol
KA-50/KA-52!!!
Because Nightmares counts in quantity of rotors.
Talshet 4 months ago
the best helicopter number 01 and the ka 50
MaFiaqllpCoeuR 5 months ago
All the vids I have seen on Ka 52 compare to the AH64LB. Now I know that dissing USA is all the rage these days, but do you think you might compare with a weapon thats not almost 30 years old? Im glad to see that Russia is coming up in the world, but our new Helos and planes don't even need pilots, and can be stamped out en mass. Its like comparing the Su 34 to the F-4 Phantom. As usual, 30 years too late. Im not saying the KA isn't awsome, but it dosn't mean USA sucks.
Jerimiah10 8 months ago
@Jerimiah10 Maybe you have no idea when the AH64 was build. And the KA50 and KA52 are only heavy ground attack helicopter not Air and ground defense helicopters like AH64 or Mi-28. And the armor of AH64 is just average like the Mi-24.The russian took the armor from the Su-25 for the KA-50 and KA-52, the armor of Su-25 is best armored jet this is confirmed by all countries.It can hold 40mm explosive shells and 80mm rpg rounds. AH64 can hold 23mm.Mi-28 can hold 23mm till 30mm litle more than AH64
Talshet 4 months ago
@Talshet , @Jerimiah10 that is what US fanboys do all the time they think they are so good because they fight against a opponent who got stuff that is 10-30 years older than their own US stuff. You think you are awesome because they can shoot down with their jets a other who got no radar and you wonder why you win that? but look at your f4 how the fuckt up in Vietnam against the simple MIG. The Ah64 LB is a HGAC and no anti air... the KA 52 is able do handle both things.
Vanadium 3 months ago
@Vanadium Absolutely ,- thumbs up from this Brit
PhilK5100 2 months ago
@Vanadium If you are willing to talk about me, at least feel free to reply to me too, it really says something about where you come from...
videogames73 2 months ago
@videogames73 ahw talk about you? Really that will say where I came from? But ok I will tell you when you can find the city where this guy was born: Boris Becker. This is the same City I was born and so you know where I am from.
And for the AH64 LB, most of the infantry carry gun 12,7mm heavy MG can do damage to this Chopper. And that is only a infantry gun, when the LB is under attack from a ZU-23-2 he will be dead soon but most of them are to far away for the range of a ZU-23-2
Vanadium 2 months ago
@Vanadium Son, I didn't call you a red, put that small little Asian cock into your pants, we ain't talking to you.
It doesn't matter who has the better weapon, it matters who will pull the trigger first. That's why nuclear war is a close to no chance of happening in this century.
videogames73 2 months ago
@videogames73 haha, the fuck is it. Without German tech the US only got airplanes and some Guns but not the heavy ones. Check out what the M1 do without German tech. And ohh I forget the Nuke Bombs are German tech too. Pull the Tiger first? Only for Nuclear war. History show you what happens when you pull the trigger first.
Vanadium 2 months ago
@Vanadium That isn't really fair to say, because the United States' society is a mix of just about all races and cultures. Saying it was just made of German tech is kind of like saying that the first British tank was created by the Spanish. All races are created by man. We all come from one man, and one woman. The difference is just many adaptions. All Russians, Europeans, Americans, Asians and Africans are all humans traced back to two humans. It matters who pulls any trigger. A gun is bad too.
videogames73 2 months ago
@videogames73 Are you trying to say that the yanks WOULDN'T have used nukes if the Russians hadn't armed their adversaries ? For fucks sake, there have been several yank generals WANTED to use nukes against Koreans, Vietnamese and even China for God's sake. Starting with that nutcase McArthur, Curtis LeMay - etc etc etc
PhilK5100 2 months ago
@PhilK5100 We don't want to nuke them. Where did that come from, cold war propaganda or something? We wish our ancestors didn't use our nukes, but I guess it was best for us, because we would have gained more casualties. McArthur was a crazy man who profited off of fear. Are you going to tell me that the reds have NEVER had such a crazy man in your civilization? Do you forget how your people would kill jews for lulz? No one is great, We threatened China but reds threatened us. Fear is key.
videogames73 2 months ago
@videogames73 Aye good point, let say that Humans are stupid because they create things like that.
Vanadium 2 months ago
@videogames73 Look pal, I dunno if your head is in the sand, or up your arse, but you haven't a clue about your own military history. Have alook on google. There'll be a few wanting to mention it. Mention LeMay and McArthur. But theres a few more who wanted it.
Kennedy had all sorts of problems keeping the nuke 'em hawks in line.
But - you're as bad as a muslim revisionist, or an american-irish catholic - ignore truth because its inconvenient.
PhilK5100 2 months ago
@Talshet AH64 was made from the 70s, but they keep updating it
PhilK5100 2 months ago
america sucks....great work russia
uzair3033 8 months ago
@uzair3033 Hahaha, hows that soviet union doing? Sounds like your political spectrum of rainbows always hits the thunderstorm.
videogames73 2 months ago
RUSSIA No.1 !!! uraaaaaaa..
1968drale 9 months ago
im glad to see they pratice sprialing out of control and crashing bc thats all they are gonna do against the U.S.
jkg01231 10 months ago
everybody here is an expert on this shit. I think you should sit back , relax, have a beer, enjoy the technology... Let's hope we don't get to see these machines in use. PS ... Only in a Call of Duty ...
dima1978 1 year ago 18
@dima1978 Chechen rebels did see this monster attacking them, they were hiding up in the high mountains once where no tail rotor helicopter could go, and thought they were safe, until they were attacked by a Kamov
VERGIS92 1 week ago
Golly :) You'd have to be an idiot to stil wana dog Russia!! Holy hell, this chopper is sick and alongside the other kick ass Havoc and even the Hind there's just nothing like em. Designed for doomsday WW3 and perform like it too - well thats all you can ask and the Russians have done it. Also love that new Pak Fa design - and this all happened this year with latest modifications - outfuckinstanding XD
strizhi 1 year ago
Sweet!
lst1195 1 year ago
its Sound Rocks xDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
chotuzwazzz 1 year ago
lol. mercanaries calm down man. the comment was not directed to attack any other country. he was just trying to correct someone. Im sure japan, russia and germany has a lot of good technology there
villaguitarist309 1 year ago
It's beautiful lol
LastRussianEmporer 1 year ago 3
china will go west first than east if u know what i mean
obilic85 1 year ago
Thats modern???
omg it looks like from the 70s or something -.-
75426168 1 year ago
@75426168 Russland braucht sein Militär nicht mit Designs zu verschönern, die Fähigkeiten dieser Maschinen sind viel wichtiger als das Aussehen und gerade deswegen lieben viele Menschen russische Militärtechnik.
SovjetPhoenix 1 year ago 8
@75426168
Yeah, it looks like shit...
But your silly comment pretty much says you got no clue about what are you talking at all...
AH-64 'Apache' is the project finished in the 70ies... Yep... The seventies... And still it's one of the best(probably THE best) attack helicopter yet made...
So... Please... Don't talk random about things you don't know much about...
Orthodoxcrusader 1 year ago
@Orthodoxcrusader
wow you are pathetic fucking dumb ass putting down every country as you wish..
uh news flash the U.S only makes WMD's... other country get more advanced like Japan,Germany and Russia..
while the charger fags in the U.S only think of ways on how to destroy congrats you people earned a metal in hell.
mercanaries3 1 year ago
@mercanaries3
You're a moron... And i'm not putting any country down... The FACT is Ka-52 is CRAP!
It is one of two PROTOTYPES... Plus it doesn't have the AIMING AVIONICS onboard; but on a Mi-8 that FOLLOWS...
Do you know crap? AH64 is THE BEST attack helicopter for now, weather you agree with that or not... It IS a fact...
Get your facts straight....
Orthodoxcrusader 1 year ago
@Orthodoxcrusader
its not a prototype :D
it have all the avionics :D
you are so funny :DDD
sirhalyavshik 1 year ago
@75426168
Hahahahahahahaha
MuerteyMalevolencia 1 year ago
beware if chinese come east..
surv91ilmari 1 year ago
@surv91ilmari Why, Rickshaws don't float
SteveHandlebar 1 year ago
wild Russian helicopter appears!
Russian chopper instills fear upon its enemies.
America uses ac130.
america wins. LOLOL
videogames73 9 months ago
@videogames73 Makes no sense.
clawbog2 7 months ago
@clawbog2 It never does, does it.
videogames73 7 months ago
@videogames73 I hope you were trying to make a joke.:)
clawbog2 7 months ago
@clawbog2 Kinda, It was a while ago, I honestly couldn't remember.
videogames73 7 months ago
@videogames73 Russians use S-300.
C-130 lose.
Talshet 4 months ago
@Talshet
Wild Afghanistan appears!
Russians run away.
got away safely.
united states uses operation enduring freedom!
united states attempts to catch Afghanistan
*click* Afghanistan was caught.
*Warning*-Afghanistan is a wild country and will not respond to most commands unless forced to.
videogames73 4 months ago
@videogames73 If the US tries to be clever with the Russkis, they'd get a nasty surprise. Its one thing taking on a bunch of Pakis and Arabs in Afghanistan (and even a few Afghans !), quite another taking on Russians. While American hardware is great, it also requires ridiculous backup, and has far too many showboating pricks piloting them - evidence is the disgusting amount of friendly fire deaths from the Yanks.
PhilK5100 2 months ago
@PhilK5100 Hahaha, you call us Yanks, and we call Brits Yanks...Funny. Any how, we are each brought up through propaganda. You have been told that friendly fire happens often. That is not true. In fact, that is very rare, excluding Vietnam. The average friendly fire kill rate is roughly 2%. If you are going to tell me your army doesn't do the same, you are a liar. You are also told that "showboating pricks" are most of our pilots. That is not true. In fact, most pilots are very professional.
videogames73 2 months ago
@videogames73 The term "yank" began when the original Dutch of New Amsterdam invented their own version of the British "John Bull" and called him "Jan Kies" the British therefore called them all "Jan Kies" = "Yankees" - hardly insulting.
And since when have the Brits been called "Yanks" ? Limeys, Poms, and various others, few complimentary. But thats nicknames for you.
And friendly fire does happen often. More often with American forces than others .
And many of the US pilots ARE showboaters.
PhilK5100 2 months ago
@videogames73 The Americans were arming fanatical muslim extremists with the latest weapons, and even had advisors in Afghanistan doing it.
THATS why the Russians got out (Hardly "ran away"") The Russians AREN'T arming the Taliban. Thats the difference.
Then the weapons and money yanks gave the Afghani extremists (who were mainly Arab and Pakistani as now) were turned on other countries, and the money went to pay for attacks on American targets.
But thats the Yanks for you
PhilK5100 2 months ago
@PhilK5100 Cool 2 comments bro. Anyhow, let me get this straight, you reds can arm the Vietnamese and the Koreans, but if we dare try to play your game with the Afgans, we are doing the wrong thing? Yep, perfect argument. I see why your government(s) haven't lasted longer than 1 third of ours since the 1900s. Too tough? It's ok.
Stereotypical names are passed around all over with different meanings. Some people call Russians AND Germans reds. We call brits yanks, others dont. We arent all alike.
videogames73 2 months ago
@videogames73 Red ??? Me ?? Nothing could be further from the truth
Just a realist.
PhilK5100 2 months ago
@PhilK5100 Sorry, just a guess because most Russians get butthurt.
videogames73 2 months ago
@videogames73 They have every reason to get angry about American double standards - note that even the Americans never try to accuse Russia for arming muslim extremists like THEY did ?
PhilK5100 2 months ago
@PhilK5100 So, you're saying that classic Korean "I NUKE YOU BECRUS I CAHN" attitude wouldn't have been obtained if the reds didn't arm them for a civil war? Because ever since, they sure are trying to look feisty. And to my man, Kim Jong IL, Good night sweet prince! And yes, we blamed you for their attitude, but i'm sure when someone nukes someone else, that nuclear deterrence would kill us all. Cheers my friend, because we're all gonna die! Great job stealing our nuke idea, it worked so well!
videogames73 2 months ago
@Talshet The yanks aren't stupid. They have their own version and have equipment to deal with the S300 too (great as it is)
PhilK5100 2 months ago
Only one thing you are forgetting, the Ka-52 is untested for length of service and battle time. The numbers are fine but don't mean anything until it is has been tested. Too many superior designs have looked great on the boards but failed in battle. Give it a few years and let the Chinese come north maybe, and then compare them again...lol
Sapper194th 1 year ago
@Sapper194th Ka-50 was tested in Chechnya and very successfully. Ka-52 is brutally modernized Ka-50
kibabiba 1 year ago