Hm. Interesting piece. I don't know if I like the whole thing - there are several places where the piano just starts zipping around playing extremely-difficult runs that are barely audible in the performance and have pretty much no effect on the overall piece. The overall piece being generally good, though, I think. I need to listen a few more times.
@OrangeSodaKing Yeah. I don't think I dislike the piece. In fact, I think it's brilliant. I'm just not sure the piano has anything to do with it... I mean, it's sort of providing little flourishes for most of the piece while the orchestra does all the important stuff. More like concerto for orchestra and piano than piano and orchestra, perhaps? Either way... not the most rewarding piano part, but nice piece.
@BenMcCormack91 I agree with you. Have you heard Saint Saen's 4th piano concerto? It's kind of similar in concept... The piano seems to just complement the orchestra, and is still beautiful!
There was a big aesthetic debate in the 19th century concerning Romanticism. Hoffmann (c.1813) thought that non-representational music was Romantic. Liszt sort of countered that with Annees de Pelerinage/Symphonic Poems/etc., but Brahms was Liszt's aesthetic rival - he wrote the more 'absolute' music; hence the generally-accepted "Brahms the Classicist".
This is quite literally the final word in concertos..I'm all for saying that Prokofiev 2, Rach 3, and Tchaik 1 will totally destroy everyone..but even the can't stand up to this ...thing...i mean 4 mvmts with awesome choir?! 2 cadenza in the 4th mvmt alone..its just too awesome..rehearsal has to suck tho
But despite my great affection for this piece, I personally can not say that it is better than any other. Such decisions make me head. I think this piece is as good as the rest, with a cadenzatic flair at the end
You can't say hardness exactly. It depends on which parts of your technique are the most advanced. For example, octaves could be good, but your fine chromatic technique could be quite horrendous
Great music - I see Busoni was a child prodigy. I heard that Ogdon was enormously popular ahead of Askhenatzy even in Russia. Ogdon committed suicide - had much depression etc
this music grows on one I feel...the more I play it the better it sounds.
A former student of Ogdon's at Indiana has the original and allowed me to make a xerox copy of it. I have no idea how you could see it. How would that work?
You know, it occurred to me, if you want the music you should contact Breitkopf and Hartel. They'll make a a nice copy for you from their microfiche. Ten years ago they did it for me for the Liszt-Busoni Ad Nos Ad Salutarem Undam, which of course has also been out of print for eighty years. They charged me about 50 Deutschmarks.
I was fortunate enough to hear these musicians in this work just before they recorded it,(Fairfield Hall, Croydon!), I was about fourteen and i remember even now how my hair stood on end & my spine tingled, pinned to the back of my seat for the whole hour and?......It's just the same when i hear it now. Thanks for the chance to hear it again and to present it to many new admirers.
I remember travelling all the way from Accrington to the Albert Hall to hear Peter Donohoe give a performance of this concerto back in 1988, and it was well worth the travel. I think Ogdon captured the Brahmsian gravitas and magisterium of the first movement better than Donohoe, esp. as the piano has to make a forceful, molto robusto impact after the long intro, but Donohoe captured the Italian elements of the inner movements rather better. The last movement belongs more to the choir, tho'.
Donohoe is amazing! I actually heard him play John Ogdon's 1st Piano Concerto some time ago. It was breathtaking, and quite an exquisite account of Ogdon's genius!
This concerto has grown on me, I've listened to it over 50 times now and it gets better each and every time. I like the tempo in Ogdon's performance it definitely has a much heavier feel to it, the Hamelin one is excellent although the intro is a little more sprightly. Both performances are simply outrageous as far as I'm concerned.
The greatest concerto ever written!!!
Sword1479 10 months ago
Hm. Interesting piece. I don't know if I like the whole thing - there are several places where the piano just starts zipping around playing extremely-difficult runs that are barely audible in the performance and have pretty much no effect on the overall piece. The overall piece being generally good, though, I think. I need to listen a few more times.
BenMcCormack91 1 year ago
@BenMcCormack91 The beginning is sure beautiful, though!!
OrangeSodaKing 1 year ago
@OrangeSodaKing Yeah. I don't think I dislike the piece. In fact, I think it's brilliant. I'm just not sure the piano has anything to do with it... I mean, it's sort of providing little flourishes for most of the piece while the orchestra does all the important stuff. More like concerto for orchestra and piano than piano and orchestra, perhaps? Either way... not the most rewarding piano part, but nice piece.
BenMcCormack91 1 year ago
@BenMcCormack91 I agree with you. Have you heard Saint Saen's 4th piano concerto? It's kind of similar in concept... The piano seems to just complement the orchestra, and is still beautiful!
OrangeSodaKing 1 year ago
Op 39... maybe he was trying in some way to parallel the alkan concerto... ;)
88alan8800 1 year ago
"PER ME L'OPERA D'ARTE È LO SCOPO SUPREMO DI OGNI ATTIVITÀ UMANA." (Ferruccio Busoni)
tsbsartini 1 year ago
Odgon in this is magistral! certainly, definitly the best key touch " profondis" of this piece of music.
trehinoonagh 1 year ago 2
Tghe entrance of the Piano at 4:36 is the best how I was ear. Great Ogdon and Busoni!
LisztBusoni 1 year ago 4
So beautiful! I bought this and listen to it religiously! :D
OrangeSodaKing 1 year ago
@Sword1479
There was a big aesthetic debate in the 19th century concerning Romanticism. Hoffmann (c.1813) thought that non-representational music was Romantic. Liszt sort of countered that with Annees de Pelerinage/Symphonic Poems/etc., but Brahms was Liszt's aesthetic rival - he wrote the more 'absolute' music; hence the generally-accepted "Brahms the Classicist".
Hope this helps
danjuan88 1 year ago
Brahms suffused w/ Mediterranean light? Yes! - at least in this movement. Ogdon's playing is magisterial - few, if any, can match him.
kapariz44 1 year ago
This is quite literally the final word in concertos..I'm all for saying that Prokofiev 2, Rach 3, and Tchaik 1 will totally destroy everyone..but even the can't stand up to this ...thing...i mean 4 mvmts with awesome choir?! 2 cadenza in the 4th mvmt alone..its just too awesome..rehearsal has to suck tho
OniyukiRyuken 2 years ago
It is quite a monumental piece isn't it?
But despite my great affection for this piece, I personally can not say that it is better than any other. Such decisions make me head. I think this piece is as good as the rest, with a cadenzatic flair at the end
ciliaspippi 2 years ago
how hard is this exactly.
maydengarNSBHS 2 years ago
You can't say hardness exactly. It depends on which parts of your technique are the most advanced. For example, octaves could be good, but your fine chromatic technique could be quite horrendous
ciliaspippi 2 years ago
great!!! Thanks a lot for posting it
astrofizzi12 2 years ago
It's one hundred and eighty legal size pages. that sounds like the same number of PDF's to me.
dorfmanjones 2 years ago
Even Tchaikovskiy's 97 page concerto doesn't stand up to it!
ciliaspippi 2 years ago
che meraviglia MERAVIGLIOSA.Ciao
napoleoneterzo 2 years ago
Great music - I see Busoni was a child prodigy. I heard that Ogdon was enormously popular ahead of Askhenatzy even in Russia. Ogdon committed suicide - had much depression etc
this music grows on one I feel...the more I play it the better it sounds.
quagapp 2 years ago
Ogdon didn't kill himself; he died from complications resulting from diabetes, not suicide.
jiolsmolimassunemo 2 years ago
Comment removed
maydengarNSBHS 2 years ago
actually, yes. I I have the two piano reduction by Egon Petri with John Ogdon's handwritten notations.
dorfmanjones 2 years ago
Comment removed
maydengarNSBHS 2 years ago
A former student of Ogdon's at Indiana has the original and allowed me to make a xerox copy of it. I have no idea how you could see it. How would that work?
dorfmanjones 2 years ago
you could convert the image into a pdf file. which shouldnt take too long =/
maydengarNSBHS 2 years ago
You know, it occurred to me, if you want the music you should contact Breitkopf and Hartel. They'll make a a nice copy for you from their microfiche. Ten years ago they did it for me for the Liszt-Busoni Ad Nos Ad Salutarem Undam, which of course has also been out of print for eighty years. They charged me about 50 Deutschmarks.
dorfmanjones 2 years ago
Amazing that it's all available online now, for free. It's so good for ambitious pianists.
Brianjonestown 2 years ago
I was fortunate enough to hear these musicians in this work just before they recorded it,(Fairfield Hall, Croydon!), I was about fourteen and i remember even now how my hair stood on end & my spine tingled, pinned to the back of my seat for the whole hour and?......It's just the same when i hear it now. Thanks for the chance to hear it again and to present it to many new admirers.
NOSEhow2LIV 2 years ago
One of the greatest ever concerto for piano. Busoni is a genius who starts now to be known. I have this CD from EMI recordings, it's superb!
Horushu 2 years ago 2
inimitable majesty to the piano entrance - does anyone else think that a comment on the tchaikovsky concerto no. 1?
kasyapa 3 years ago
This is much superior!
LifeSurferer 2 years ago
A treat. A concerto that shows how pointless the Brahms or Liszt arguments were in the 19th century, this work managing to be both, and more.
ianduckworth 3 years ago 2
@ianduckworth Which arguments?
Sword1479 1 year ago
I first heard this concerto in 1968 on KFAC. I bought the recording (The Ogden one). It is an incredible, dare I say, unique piece of music.
iamkwk 3 years ago 3
just breathtaking...
jiolsmolimassunemo 3 years ago 5
I remember travelling all the way from Accrington to the Albert Hall to hear Peter Donohoe give a performance of this concerto back in 1988, and it was well worth the travel. I think Ogdon captured the Brahmsian gravitas and magisterium of the first movement better than Donohoe, esp. as the piano has to make a forceful, molto robusto impact after the long intro, but Donohoe captured the Italian elements of the inner movements rather better. The last movement belongs more to the choir, tho'.
kapariz44 3 years ago
Donohoe is amazing! I actually heard him play John Ogdon's 1st Piano Concerto some time ago. It was breathtaking, and quite an exquisite account of Ogdon's genius!
scriabinwasmydad 2 years ago
This concerto has grown on me, I've listened to it over 50 times now and it gets better each and every time. I like the tempo in Ogdon's performance it definitely has a much heavier feel to it, the Hamelin one is excellent although the intro is a little more sprightly. Both performances are simply outrageous as far as I'm concerned.
KeithWhalen11 3 years ago 2
actually there are only 5 at the Moment who can play it!
Khalisnight 3 years ago
At last, i`m going to listen to this concerto, there are very few pianists who recorded it... Thanks for sharing it!!
andrevazpereira1980 3 years ago 3