Atheists don't see nature as being only savage! Well, i guess some might, just as some religious people also have a similar perspective that nature is something for mankind to master and tame.
It is true that various attitudes and beliefs exist on both sides, but the fact still remains that when you remove God from the picture - we are nothing more than highly fortunate animals. In which case, it is survival of the fittest - and there is no reason or basis for ethics. Some Christians have had the wrong idea about what it means to rule over the earth, but the Bible is clear that we are stewards of God's Creation - and we are commanded to tend and care for it.
symbiotic relationship can be mutualistic, parasitic, commensal. In this case, aphid-ant is a mutualistic relationship
dol345 1 year ago
More like the cows of the ant world.
klober23 4 years ago
aphits,the sheep of the ant world
newyorkny5023 4 years ago
Is the atheist's so called "nature" savage only? Obviously not.
kaydenraine 4 years ago
Atheists don't see nature as being only savage! Well, i guess some might, just as some religious people also have a similar perspective that nature is something for mankind to master and tame.
Camilo83 3 years ago
It is true that various attitudes and beliefs exist on both sides, but the fact still remains that when you remove God from the picture - we are nothing more than highly fortunate animals. In which case, it is survival of the fittest - and there is no reason or basis for ethics. Some Christians have had the wrong idea about what it means to rule over the earth, but the Bible is clear that we are stewards of God's Creation - and we are commanded to tend and care for it.
PeterSchriemer 3 years ago