Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (45)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 7:09 - is that the Pentagon ?!

    P.S. No 4 ACTA !

  • Anybody who seriously believes that 9/11 was the work of a handful of hi-hackers really needs treatment.

  • All you "Inside Job" people really are pathetic, parts of the plane WERE retrieved, eyewitness conformation...why do I even bother, the WTC was clearly struck by two planes and there is plenty of video footage and yet idiots still say that the building were detonated inside (get a life people and be happy you or your family were not involved in this tragic event)

  • AT 9:00 also note that a car that just skidded sideways with brakes or not.. DID NOT LEAVE SKID MARKS.?

  • Inside Job and Coverup!

  • if a plane hit the Pentagon they would show the film that they have. But since the film shows the global hawk hitting it they will NOT show any one of 80 cameras would have captured the accident. Abundance of wreckage was absent!!!

  • The big question? When is the law going to be involved? When is it going to be when charges are brought forth and laid? Surely the US hasn't been infiltrated to the extent where the law doesn't apply, am i to believe a few individuals can do something on this scale and avoid prosecution? Has the US become that infiltrated that all the judges,prosecutors,law ppl are either corrupt and are with these ppl or are unwilling to speak up for fear of what? I find it astounding nothing is done about 911

  • no plane on video and no wreckage in site = inside job

  • They always show the CRASH of the NASA 707 plane, but they never show the END of that same video, where, after the fire, only the NOSE, TAIL and wingtips survived.

    ALL The rest of that aircraft burned, right to the Tarmac, and that's WITHOUT hitting an armored building like the Pentagon.

  • 911=Inside Job=Anthrax attacks

  • i saw this on National Geografic , they explain whats happening in the airplane and who survived  in the building.

  • National Geographic can't be trusted... I saw that same video, and the one concerning "thermate". This was the worst work I've ever seen NG involve itself in. ...the same is true for Popular Mechanics ...plus, guess who owns NG? Inside Job and Coverup!

  • it is cleary - cruise missile. america - you are brainwashed nation of zombies...dangerous zombies

  • there is no evidence at all of a cruise missil.

  • question...doesnt the pentagon have cameras?..if so that would show it was a plane that hit..my opinion it wasnt!!!

  • so what did hit the pentagon? in your intelligent opinion.

  • @Sweetp424 Uh ask the FBI they have all the surveillance footage.

  • @JulietsMan lmao wow this comment was posted 2 yrs ago and i just got a reply!!! :) no need for the sarcasm hun it was a comment made at the moment

  • @Sweetp424

    The Pentagon certainly does have cameras. Hundreds of them.

    On the roof, on the perimeter fence and inside the building on every corridor. And it appears not one of them recorded the impact

  • My big unanswered questions about 9-11.

    Where is the 757 wreckage that hit the Pentagon ?

    Where is the 757 wreckage that crashed in Philladelphia ?

    Why did WTC 7 collapse ?

    Why did the twin towers both collapse at free fall speed ?

    I'm not a conspiracy theorist, I'm only asking questions !

  • And why did bush state that he saw the the television in the class room that the first tower was hit before he was informed the second was hit when the first video of the first tower being hit wasn't released untill the next day....inside job to start a war, its exactly how hitler did it...

  • Pensylvania, not philladelphia; yes, I agree with you; whenever there's a crash, at least the tail can be visible. They don't even want to show the videos of the cameras, they took all the video evidences from the nearby hotels

  • bullshit. "whenever theres a crash, atleast the tails visible". bullshiiiit lmao. a nose dive at 580mph? lmfao

  • 4:Why did the twin towers both collapse at free fall speed ?

    -they did not. unless ur nly looking at the smoke cloud.

    south tower. 15.25 seconds.

    north tower. 22 seconds.

  • @Cornerforward

    I'm pretty sure that it didn't fall at 9.8m/s

  • @Cornerforward

    There was no plane that hit the pentagon it was a missle

    There was no plane

    WTC Building 7 was brought down on a controlled collapse and it's been admitted by the owner of the building

    The twin towers were hit by planes with exploseives planted on them and pre planted explosives inside the building

    I'm not a conspiracy theorist just someone who doesn't believe in the US Government

  • @Cornerforward NOOO Noo no no...YOU dont get off that easy! you tin hat wearing lunaitc fringe anti american obama loving socialist nazi communist fag pig dog! YOU ask questions YOU better GENERATE some answers from ur puny prehistoric brain. If you dont cook up some answers then YOU ARE a conspiracy theorist. Dont just ask questions. Postulate silly bullshit answers that have no basis in logic and dont challenge the official story (lie) then you are a true patriot.

  • Comment removed

  • @Cornerforward ONCE again youtubers who dont know what 'sarcasm' is STRIKE AGAIN. Its a sarcastic comment you doe doe bird. Save your watered down pious critique for someone else. As a matter of fact, keep working on it until its not so watered down and pious and then you MIGHT have some real critical power to use on someone who's ACTUALLY OPPOSING YOUR VIEW!! You Dummy!

  • Comment removed

  • @Cornerforward There indeed was wreckage found in the pentagons facility. pieces of the fuselage, engine and landing gear.

    I can’t answer the second question due to the fact that i have not read enough about it.

    WTC 7 collapsed due to the sheer amount of debris and activity colliding with the building.

    They fell at free fall speed due to the fact that there was no downwards pressure on the building. more so the fact that the building was at 2000 degrees! the steel simply melted.

  • @soymuydebil Some wreckage was found in the Pentagon, but non has been independently identified as 77's

    Same with U93. In any event of a civilian air disaster, every single piece of the aircraft if collected & put together again for the investigation

    NIST said WTC7 collapsed due to a fire (from the towers) causing column 79 to fail on floor 12, not cuz debris directly hitting it. Watch this video /watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw

    So you know, 'free fall' is measured by acceleration, not speed. WTC7

    (cont)

  • @soymuydebil (from prev)

    free fell for the 8 stories (100ft). For a building to go from motionless to free fall instantly, there is only 1 explanation. I don't understand your 'no downward pressure' statement, can you explain please.

    In an normal office fire, temps do not reach high enough to melt steel, even with added jet fuel. At 800C, steel does lose 80-90% of its strength, but as proved by British Steel in 95 & other steel building fires in history, it doesn't collapse.

    (cont)

  • @soymuydebil (from prev)

    However, orange/yellow molten metal was recorded coming out of WTC2 7min before collapse. Prof Steven Jones determined this metal to be iron by the method of 'Planck's Law'. NIST tried to claim it was molten aluminium (AL) from the plane or WTC skin, mixed with office furnishings, but Jones also proved that molten AL is silver when poured in the air & won't mix with organic material due to its density, they simply burn on it.

    Watch this video /watch?v=3PawC4u1U7k

    (cont)

  • @soymuydebil Jones, as well as the USGS, Dr Niels Harrit, RJ Lee Group & Livermore Labs all found residues of an incendiary material called thermite. These were micro iron spheres, unreacted red-grey chips & high levels of sulphur & barium (S & B)

    When S&B are added to thermite, it reduced the melting temp of steel & is called thermate, a military grade form used for disabling abandoned artillery. Dr Gunnar Ries has tried to say this is primer paint used on steel (Golden Gate Bridge) but

    (cont)

  • @soymuydebil (from prev)

    barium is a highly toxic metal & is not used in paint. Also paint isnt explosive

    Dr F Greening tried to theorize that the sulphur came from the WTC drywall as it sat in the rubble. But after numerous experiments by AE911Truth engineer Jonathan Cole he withdrew his theory saying that "drywall just wouldn't do it"

    All these residue come from thermite. Nat Geo says thermite of any kind cannot destroy steel columns,

    (cont)

  • @soymuydebil (from prev)

    but as Cole again showed it can. There have also been thermitic demolition charges patented to cut steel & concrete columns. Patent No #5532449 - Murakami July 2nd '96

    Thermite charges can be used "with high efficiency, while preventing a secondary problem due to noise, flying dust & chips, & the like"

    Here's Cole's channel /user/physicsandreason

    Hope I have been of some help and if you need any more sources to confirm what i said, just ask

  • If you think that a 757 airliner hit the Penetagon, well.....OK then.

    WHERE'S THE FRIGGING RECKAGE !!!!

  • take 10 god damn seconds of ur life to look for it. its not hidden.

  • IT WAS A CRUISE MISSLE !!

  • No, cruise missiles do not explode into a fireball. They are usually filled with a dry fuel compound and use dry explosives. Fireballs like the one seen were created by fuel such as jet fuel. Obviously you have never been in the military.

  • I want some of what you're smoking!

  • i think your heads been hit a few times to many on the football field lmao.if you have any information video or pics to prove this video wrong i'd like to see and hear it ,if not stop spewing from the mouth.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more