i still think global warming is a hoax. i don't see it at all. Its december 2011, exactly 7 years ago at exactly this date, my friends and i were boiling at the beach. Today its cloudy and cool outside. Global warming = political scam.
The debate in Australia is even worse than in the US. Lots of hostile treatment of skeptics and disrespect for dissenters. And of course the repetition "the science is settled, the science is settled!"
@FantasticBob7000 Right, so because I'm telling you that you're wrong, I'm a troll?
Nonetheless, the science is pretty settled. In fact I could link you to hundreds of peer-reviewed papers, show you statements by highly respected scientific institutions and organisations and show you survey statistics that ~99% of scientists agree upon human activity has an adverse effect on global warming
And yet, people such as yourself still continue to 'deny'. What will it possibly take for me to show you?
@Borridd You're such a confused ditz you don't even know what I'm wrong about. Hell you don't even know what the scientific consensus is that you keep repeating like a trained pet.
"Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change" - Journalist source gives an overview of it if you don't wish to read.
and
"Expert credibility in climate change" - Pnas has the full paper, skip to the results if you again don't wish to read, it outlines the conclusions of the paper.
I'm not repeating anything here, I'm giving you some papers to support my claim. I believe it is you who is repeating yourself.
@Borridd HA HA HA you freaks are all the same. You're not the first GW daffodil I've come across who likes pasting document references in place of his own arguments.
So what was I wrong about Einstein? Read my posts again and and explain it to me.
My comment referred to the GW tactics seen in this vid. I said nothing about the science itself. Now try articulating what you think the scientific consensus is. If you say it's that climate change is real or if you drop more references I will reach into my monitor and bitch slap you like the logically challenged bundle of nonsense that you are.
300,000 Scientists saying global warming is a Swindle... Research Climate Gate... Algore sacrifises children in robes at his Bohiem Grove secret society with the most richest Banking Familys in the world... look it up .. Bohiem Grove.....
World money powers would rather reduce population by profiting from it by making war, lending monies to both sides, diseases+ineffective healthcare treatments, famine, commodity shortages.
Instead they should educate everyone more, prevent poor people who cannot support children from having them, stop sequestering useful inventions for fake purposes of national security, stop dumbing down the education systems, reverse any propaganda for fake science studies & theories involving advanced tech.
there has been no statistically significant global warming for 16 years, we've had global cooling for 10 years, since 2001 the earth has been cooling, since 2003 the oceans have been cooling. there are 5 times as many polar bears as there were 40 years ago.550 million years ago during the cambrian era, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere where 20 times today's levels, and the oceans didn't acidify, the seas didnt rise. all in all global warming is a hoax
Ahhh... The climate change scaremongers. Proven to be a pack of left-wing dills, all of whom are hypocrites who drive cars, use electricity, fly in aircraft, etcetera.
@Enricom23 Coming from a 'left wing dill', what do you suggest I do to get to university (other than catch the bus I already take)? For those of us willing to make changes, we do. Some of those changes include reducing the amount of km's our food travels by growing our own food, reducing our power consumption by diligently watching how many lights are on etc, and where possible, buy cars that are fuel efficient. Unfortunately, I was born into a world in which I am having to responsibly change.
That collective, liberal leftie sigh...oh, just so ignorant aren't you. You don't understand the 'science' and you don't care about your environmemt...nasty, stupid people. Why don't you just zip it and let us get on with our superior in every way agenda?
Don't ask me what the agenda is though, because I myself am not really sure. Though I think it's something to do with rich people who like to do selfish stuff like driving cars and flying off on holiday and going to work...bastards, the lot.
@scudlington They're sighing at yet another misrepresentation of Phil Jones, who agree there has been no significant warming only because the time frame is too short to make any sense of the statement - you need about 30 years to claim statistical significance. the IPA has been told this over and over and yet they peddle their lies still.
That's why people are sighing - it's tiring work to correct someone and have them serially lie in the face of it.
Who is this Mungo bearded clown who hasn't heard Phil Jones' statement!!?? And who doesn't know who Phil Jones is?!! The answer is that he's a journalist!! He has no authority to diagnose the issue as a "huge scare campaign funded by vested interest groups.." He is a political commentator! And go to hell mr. Malcolm Turnbull, politician, saying that the science is "unequivocal!" Phil Jones himself just said that he doesn't believe the scientific debate is over- Damn journalists and politicians!
@4:50 Margaret Thatcher plea to reduce CO2 emissions was a way she could get public support in order to break trade unions like the Coal Union. This had to do with political economics not the environment.
Very good point!! We ought to be focusing on all the ways we can clean up our act! But to try and group it all together with man made global warming is not going to help the cause. I am an environmentalist but I don't buy the catastrophic theories, and I don't like it when politicians get involved, because then it's all about money and talking points. We should be worried about plastics, air and water quality, deforestation and a thousand other common sense things! The climate isn't on a switch!
This has been flagged as spam show
-CO2 is not a main driver of the climate, (and never has been)
-Sea level is falling at more than 2.5mm/year. see; Topex, ENVISAT, ERS2, GFO, Jason-1 & 2.
-Expected sea level rise by 2100 is 10cm. (4")
-All IPCC models have been proven to be incorrect (Lindzen & Choi 2009, Christy, Brasswell, ect)
-Polar bears are doing just fine, (and have survived many warmer periods than now)
-Global temperatures are falling,
-Greenland and Antarctica have net ice gain,
-ect ect
Any questions?
1000frolly 2 weeks ago
ever heard of climate gate
vmgqie 2 months ago
i still think global warming is a hoax. i don't see it at all. Its december 2011, exactly 7 years ago at exactly this date, my friends and i were boiling at the beach. Today its cloudy and cool outside. Global warming = political scam.
halflifeproductionz 2 months ago
What I hate, is that if you don't agree with the Labor parties policies, suddenly you're an ignorant racist fuck.
mescalero78 2 months ago
The debate in Australia is even worse than in the US. Lots of hostile treatment of skeptics and disrespect for dissenters. And of course the repetition "the science is settled, the science is settled!"
FantasticBob7000 2 months ago
@FantasticBob7000 Deniers not skeptics.
Probably because the science is settled.
Borridd 2 months ago
@Borridd Nice trolling smartass & good job parroting the party line.
Idiot.
FantasticBob7000 2 months ago
@FantasticBob7000 Right, so because I'm telling you that you're wrong, I'm a troll?
Nonetheless, the science is pretty settled. In fact I could link you to hundreds of peer-reviewed papers, show you statements by highly respected scientific institutions and organisations and show you survey statistics that ~99% of scientists agree upon human activity has an adverse effect on global warming
And yet, people such as yourself still continue to 'deny'. What will it possibly take for me to show you?
Borridd 2 months ago
@Borridd You're such a confused ditz you don't even know what I'm wrong about. Hell you don't even know what the scientific consensus is that you keep repeating like a trained pet.
FantasticBob7000 2 months ago
@FantasticBob7000 Google:
"Structure of Scientific Opinion on Climate Change" - Journalist source gives an overview of it if you don't wish to read.
and
"Expert credibility in climate change" - Pnas has the full paper, skip to the results if you again don't wish to read, it outlines the conclusions of the paper.
I'm not repeating anything here, I'm giving you some papers to support my claim. I believe it is you who is repeating yourself.
Borridd 2 months ago
@Borridd HA HA HA you freaks are all the same. You're not the first GW daffodil I've come across who likes pasting document references in place of his own arguments.
So what was I wrong about Einstein? Read my posts again and and explain it to me.
You tit.
FantasticBob7000 2 months ago
@FantasticBob7000 You made a satirical comment about how the science is settled, which you implied that it isn't.
Borridd 2 months ago
@Borridd It's like freaking pulling teeth.
My comment referred to the GW tactics seen in this vid. I said nothing about the science itself. Now try articulating what you think the scientific consensus is. If you say it's that climate change is real or if you drop more references I will reach into my monitor and bitch slap you like the logically challenged bundle of nonsense that you are.
FantasticBob7000 2 months ago
300,000 Scientists saying global warming is a Swindle... Research Climate Gate... Algore sacrifises children in robes at his Bohiem Grove secret society with the most richest Banking Familys in the world... look it up .. Bohiem Grove.....
MultiABCDE123 3 months ago
malcom just say it: tony is stupid
judicum 3 months ago
Q&A: Questions, Answers, no action...
big1gangsta2clink 4 months ago
World money powers would rather reduce population by profiting from it by making war, lending monies to both sides, diseases+ineffective healthcare treatments, famine, commodity shortages.
Instead they should educate everyone more, prevent poor people who cannot support children from having them, stop sequestering useful inventions for fake purposes of national security, stop dumbing down the education systems, reverse any propaganda for fake science studies & theories involving advanced tech.
oldspammer 6 months ago
Realize that the funding for all the CO2 science is done by the world controllers: Rockefeller+Rothschild.
Video search (George Hunt UN UNCED)
Monckton claims that even if all human production of CO2 is cut off for 30 years, the levels of CO2 would only be reduced by about 14%.
Better solution is to nationalize fresh water sources & grow green plants to absorb CO2 & produce oxygen.
New taxes+enforcement will just cause price increases, job losses, shortages, starvation, riots
R we learning yet?
oldspammer 6 months ago
there has been no statistically significant global warming for 16 years, we've had global cooling for 10 years, since 2001 the earth has been cooling, since 2003 the oceans have been cooling. there are 5 times as many polar bears as there were 40 years ago.550 million years ago during the cambrian era, carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere where 20 times today's levels, and the oceans didn't acidify, the seas didnt rise. all in all global warming is a hoax
sexcwog2010 10 months ago
China and India, please cut your emissions immediately. These two countries alone have 2 Billion plus people contributing to "global warming"'
Enricom23 1 year ago
Ahhh... The climate change scaremongers. Proven to be a pack of left-wing dills, all of whom are hypocrites who drive cars, use electricity, fly in aircraft, etcetera.
Enricom23 1 year ago
@Enricom23 Coming from a 'left wing dill', what do you suggest I do to get to university (other than catch the bus I already take)? For those of us willing to make changes, we do. Some of those changes include reducing the amount of km's our food travels by growing our own food, reducing our power consumption by diligently watching how many lights are on etc, and where possible, buy cars that are fuel efficient. Unfortunately, I was born into a world in which I am having to responsibly change.
ToyMaster83 1 year ago
the crowd is just a little left wing, isn't it? made up of greens a labor supporters no doubt, not really a representation of society is it?
whessly 1 year ago
@whessly: Representative of the society members that bothered to show up i'd say.
Draziw923 1 year ago
@Draziw923 More likely the usual ABC audience.
DuketonRoberts 1 year ago
Beardy weirdy...A huge scare campaign?
By people who suspect, or at least sniff a wee little bit of fraud?
So what would the IPCC reports amount to then?...little Johnny's nursery rhymes?
Libtards are just so, so clever.
scudlington 2 years ago
That collective, liberal leftie sigh...oh, just so ignorant aren't you. You don't understand the 'science' and you don't care about your environmemt...nasty, stupid people. Why don't you just zip it and let us get on with our superior in every way agenda?
Don't ask me what the agenda is though, because I myself am not really sure. Though I think it's something to do with rich people who like to do selfish stuff like driving cars and flying off on holiday and going to work...bastards, the lot.
scudlington 2 years ago 2
@scudlington amen. capitalists basterds...
ToyMaster83 1 year ago
@scudlington They're sighing at yet another misrepresentation of Phil Jones, who agree there has been no significant warming only because the time frame is too short to make any sense of the statement - you need about 30 years to claim statistical significance. the IPA has been told this over and over and yet they peddle their lies still.
That's why people are sighing - it's tiring work to correct someone and have them serially lie in the face of it.
topologyrob 9 months ago
Who is this Mungo bearded clown who hasn't heard Phil Jones' statement!!?? And who doesn't know who Phil Jones is?!! The answer is that he's a journalist!! He has no authority to diagnose the issue as a "huge scare campaign funded by vested interest groups.." He is a political commentator! And go to hell mr. Malcolm Turnbull, politician, saying that the science is "unequivocal!" Phil Jones himself just said that he doesn't believe the scientific debate is over- Damn journalists and politicians!
keithmlarsen 2 years ago
@4:50 Margaret Thatcher plea to reduce CO2 emissions was a way she could get public support in order to break trade unions like the Coal Union. This had to do with political economics not the environment.
rusty1491 2 years ago
Why do we need to prove 'climate change' in order to stop degrading and polluting the planet?
GabrielNoWings 2 years ago 2
Very good point!! We ought to be focusing on all the ways we can clean up our act! But to try and group it all together with man made global warming is not going to help the cause. I am an environmentalist but I don't buy the catastrophic theories, and I don't like it when politicians get involved, because then it's all about money and talking points. We should be worried about plastics, air and water quality, deforestation and a thousand other common sense things! The climate isn't on a switch!
keithmlarsen 2 years ago
money talks and our world gets nailed in the butt
superfuzz 2 years ago
ur three hours ahead of me!!. that's cheating!!
superfuzz 2 years ago
Now you can go to bed early.
nonameisacat 2 years ago
@nonameisacat damn!! forensic investigators is keeping me up!
superfuzz 2 years ago