usa your time is over. China - Russia - Germany - India. - And this is it... for you this is it. Time of your dirty empire will soon be over. BYE BYE - murders!
By the end, the ruble collapsed as Soviet consumers turned to imports to satisfy their needs. They could not buy a good pair of leather boots or a good television set or a computer made in the Soviet Union, because all the boots and the electronics were swallowed up by military procurement. And, needless to say, there were no quality goods to export in order to balance imports.
The immediate cause of the Soviet collapse was economic, as the Soviet Union lost the arms race and international competition with the West. The United States was able to profit from its imperialist exploitation of other countries, while socialism could only lose economically in that competition.
The collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the 1980's was a great blow to the hopes of revolutionaries. Why did it collapse? The primary causes were political and economic and they were the result of the culture of war.
Amazing. Check out my video response for the timeline for Su fighters from 1940s till today in my channel. From Su 2 in 1939 till 2016, where this monster will soar the skies
@rsilver1211 F-22 ready, but does US budget ready for such expensive jets?
US military spendings with supplies, veterans payments, energy dept over than 1.2 trillion
And Lokcheed prepared new toy for 200 mln. $ per one unit.
We in Russia already know what is that military tech which country can not afford to itself.
And when F-35 will be in US Army your country should prepare itself for a new war for democracy...Because Wall Street in some way need return their military founds.
@mphet26 Moscow Times reported on Feb. 8 that the inclusion of FSB chief Fradkov in the Russian trip to Syria with Foreign Minister Lavrov shows how important Syria is to Russia's strategic interest. Igor Korotchenko, a military expert and an editor of the Natsionalnaya Oborona magazine, is quoted saying that "Russia can provide Assad intelligence information that foreign countries might be behind the opposition."
@devinhallsworth su47 was abandoned because of catastrophic wing cracks. russians do not possess the materials or technology to make successful forward swept wings.
I wish they'd kept designing the Foxhound. Now that plane was hella interesting and unique. I mean come on russia, you really need to have more faith in your own designs instead of just trying to reverse engineer your own F 22.
@daniGRewc haha ya its true. I didnt even know about the T50 and this was on NEWS over seas? Holy shit... alls I had to do was see something on T50 and saw it on F22. T50 out does F22 in something which all SIM pilots prefer. Personally I dont care Im all for giving you a run for your money.
Im not sure if it does but just looking at it on a YOUTUBE video. I bet it does.
I already caught onto the exhaust. Thats why F22 is like that sacraficing "dancing" capability.
Just load the jet up with chaff. Top left and right and bottom left and right. Im sure someone can design this. There has always been ways to evade missles and so on. Heat detection thing ya they will pick you up on radar. Theres ways to evade radar too. Always has been ways to do this. lol
This aircraft is quite attractive in the looks department. It is very much up for debate what the RCS of the aircraft is? The skin is clearly metalic and has no radar absorbant coating applied but this is still a proto-type. Secondly an earlier post noted the conventional engine exhaust. This too is very poor on the RCS scale. Third, no room for internal stores. Completely negates any RCS bonus the aircraft had if you have to store your weapons on pylons. A+ on looks but F-22 superior.
@HornetVF103 Exhaust shape is more about IR than RCS; F-22's rectangular exhaust is covered in heat-absorbing materials to mask IR. PAK-FA is meant to be less stealthy and more agile, like the F-22 was vs the YF-23. It's said to have two internal bays at ~4.6x1.1 metres, possibly with a set of side bays for R-73's like the F-22 has for AIM-9's. It's said to have 6 external hardpoints, much like the F-22's 4. Research is going into stealthy weapons pods and fuel tanks on both sides to use these.
Looks like a mix between the F-22 and YF-23. The rear exhausts don't look typical to "stealth" designs, but since I honestly wouldn't have any way of proving that, it's just my opinion.
@fire8746 I didn't claim they are copy cats, I just said it looks like a mix between the F-22 and YF-23. Far as "copy cats" comment, you must not know much about WW2. Russia had a technology boom after WW2, through a combination of US assistance (we helped with planes and radios) and capture of German rocket scientists after the war. This is not an insult to Russia!. This is what any wise country would do to advance technology.
@C4P1T4L15M Well, unlike eag11e, you had the brains to figure it out :D Well, ofcourse, you cant just go ahead and judge by the age, even a 13 year old can be more educated and smart than a 51 year old.
I enjoy watching the video of pak fat 50 catching on fire....OMG, so funny. I see this engine problem with pak fat 50 is more serious than originally thought. And now with the phase 2 engine in redesign, it is doubtful pak fat will ever reach or meet it's advertised specs. BTW...how is that AESA Radar coming along? LOL
if usa has one, russians had to have one. balance of terror. i whuld not be suprised if this thing is more advanced then f-22. this one is newer. then america starts the 6th generation and they have the most advanced planes of planet for that time. then russians make one. and then next gen, and so on and so on.
any model that is meant to be good! he will have some properties of f-22 f-22 because it is a model created by computer programs that if I'm not mistaken, "and all computer makes everyone knows is great to lol"
THE F-22 HAD COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS WITH THE AWACS IN TRAINING MISSIONS OVER THE GULF OF MEXIXO, FOX NEWS THEN TOLD THE WORLD.
THE AIM-120C WAS ORIGIONALY DESIGNED TO HAVE THE SAME FRONTAL FIN AS THE AIM-120A/B BUT THE ENGINEERS WERE TO STUPID TO REALISE IT WOULDNT FIT IN THE INTERNAL WEAPONS BAY.
@warriorxp111 So what, the Amraam can now be loaded no problem onto the F-22. Problems happen. That's why there are exercises...to discover them before going into real combat. You don't think Russia has problems of its own with its military weapons and aircraft. You're sadly mistaken, if that's the case.
@warriorxp111 Sure they do... and in many instances. Just look at the failures with bulava missile, or the groundings of over 75% of the Mig 29 fleet, plus many more. It's just that you have a lopsided anti-US opinion.
@TheTequilaShooter The F-22 has demonstrated it's ability to employ all of it's weapons at high supersonic speeds. No russian aircraft and certainly the euro fighter have ever demonstrated the same ability. Amraam works just fine on F-22.
@eag11e Yea, I know. When you ask them to support something they say with proof, i.e a valid source, they change the subject. Oh well.... Nice to see someone here with logic and reasoning.
@TheTequilaShooter Yes, it is funny to see semi retarded ruskies try so hard to be somebody by posting bull shit on fcuktube. I am beginning to realize the failed russian government education system is producing idiots who are not capable of functioning in the real world. No wonder the ussr failed so badly! And the current russian economy is in 3rd world status. Most of these embaciles are to stupid to feel ashamed for their failures, rather they brag about them. LOL!
chinas J-20 would fuck the F-20JEW sideways. they have the economy to build more aswell and will never be short of pilots. there government isnt a ZOG either so they dont make military cuts to save money
@warriorxp111 Here are some facts about the J-20 dumbass, and from a Russian source: "Electronic equipment, primarily radar, in China stands at approximately the same level as its engines. Chinese designs fall short of the capabilities of their Russian, European and American counterparts. A fifth-generation stealth fighter must be able to evade radar, and so it must be made from modern composite materials. However, China does not produce such materials in commercial amounts, and experts
doubt that it can develop and produce them for its Air Force. The guided weapons used in the Chinese Air Force were mostly copied from U.S., Israeli and Russian prototypes made in the 1960s through 1980s. China will have to spend a great deal of time and effort to develop its own weapons, even if it borrows elements of prototypes bought from other countries."
@warriorxp111 china has produced no engines for their f20. The only engines tested in it were russian! So china will only produce as many j20s as russia lets them. And I assure you, Fucktard, it will not be very many! Are you really as stupid as your posts indicate? Or did someone have you post your shit as a joke? I'm thinking your posts are just a joke. you could not be able to even type on a keyboard and write the stupid shit you post here.
@warriorxp111 OMG, when and if? you even have your doubts about the j20! The chinks need to learn how to make engines. Until then they will have no viable air force. And, that is not going to happen any time soon!
The quote about the PAK engine trouble is from the Moscow Times. Here's one link about the F-22's engines, inlcuding stats on its thrust: pw .utc. com/media_center/assets/me_f119_product_card. pdf
You can also find the same info at the USAF Fact Sheet on the F-22 at af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet. asp?id=199
It's not easy to find stat sheets on the PAK, unless perhaps you know Russian, so unfortunatley the only source I could find was Wiki. What's your source for the
FYI, I did find this on the PAK's engines, which is contrary to your info: "The PAK FA will use on its first flights 2 Saturn 117S engines (about 14.5 tons of thrust each). The 117S is an advanced version of the AL-31F, but built with the experience gained in the AL-41F program. The Saturn AL-41F powered the Mikoyan MFI fighter (Project/Article 1.44). Later versions of the PAK FA will use a completely new engine (17.5 tons of thrust each), developed by NPO Saturn or FGUP MMPP Salyut."
And finally, here's a link that shows the speed and range of the Pak and F-22 are rougly equal, but it's based on the PAK getting new engines, which we'll hae to wait and see: en .rian. ru/infographics/20100219/157939986. html
i was discussing the subject with a friend last night and we both concluded that we wont know which is better until they are in combat with each other, to me that sounds like a perfectly reasonalbe conclusion
big deal, it might not have stealth or thrust vectiring, it has a better turning capability than the F-22 without thrust vectoring, what does that say about the F-22's thrust vectors, waste of time. but we have pilots trained to the highest standard. the US simply puts as many units as possible on the battlefield. just think what would happen if the US went to war with China, China would win on man power alone. one of our Eurofighter pilots would treat an F-22 as training
@warriorxp111 [it has a better turning capability than the F-22 without thrust vectoring] What proof do you have, & is it with the EF flying unrealistically clean or w/ stores?
[Eurofighter pilots would treat an F-22 as training] Hey, I actually like the EF, but don't BS around. Your EF lost to the Rafale 7-1 in UAE, lost 3-0 to Paki F-16's, and avoided engaging the F-22 in UAE after they saw them beat all other opponents, & w/ rookie F-22 pilots behind the stick, too.
dont know where u get it from but paki F-16s and rafale have never fought, can u not realise yet u r just a little fan boy, go and play some ace combat or sumet
@warriorxp111 U relly are a dip-shit. Read up on the UAE exercises where the EF lost over and over to the Rafale. And, yes, Paki F-16's beat the EF three times with zero losses. And, the J-20 sucks ass. Even Russian's are lauging at it. I'm tired of your anti-US bullcrap. All talk, no facts, just bullshit time & time again.
also from projections conducted by sukhoi PAK FA T-50 only costs around 50 million dollars where as the F-22 costs around 140 million dollars. the PAK's overall program cost is around 8 billion dollars where as the F-22 project costs 60 billion. i think that the PAK is what the yankees call "more bang for your buck". less cost=more units and more money to spend on improvements and modifications
@warriorxp111 From what I've read is that the Pak will cost ~100 mil, and that figure is likely to go up, like the cost of most aircraft do over time.
@warriorxp111 your theory of more bang for the buck seems logical. But when the USA has a defense budget of over 650 Billion Dollars and russias defense budget is only around 50 Billion Dollars. The unit cost becomes mute!
no becausenot much information has been released to the general pubic because russia, unlike the stupid americans, does not make the mistake of bragging to the world about new tech allowing other nations to counter it. i know that the F-22 raptor has a top speed of 1500mph and the PAK FA T-50 has a top speed of 1560-1600 mph. it also has a climb rate of 68,900ft/min. well in excess of most aircraft. judging by the fact that the design is similar to the MIG-29 and SU-27...
@warriorxp111 Actually, the top speed of the F-22 is still classified; therefore, so much on your theory that we brag about it. + you'll find times where the actual ablities of our weapons published are understated. You never want to tell your foes the true abilites, and of couse won't make all of it public. The PAK's power projections that you cited are based on its getting new engines, where these is now some doubt will occur. In addition, the range of the PAk is projected to be ~as the
F-22, but that' with the PAK getting its new engines. Now when it comes to stealth, avionics, plus the fact that the F-22 is already in service and has done outstanding in exercises, gives it a huge edge. The PAK has a long way to go.
It took me a little time, but here's a quote: "Finally, major questions remain regarding Russia’s production of military aircraft engines. Although the first stage of research and development has been successfully completed for the 117 family of engines for the Su-35S and T-50 aircraft, it is unclear whether it will prove possible to create a full-fledged fifth-generation engine for the PAK FA second stage. The obstacle is not a lack of funding or innovative capacity
at the Saturn plant, but the need for basic technologies — especially in materials science — that could require a great deal of time and money to develop." cast. ru/eng/?id=426
and going on the fact that your origional reply has been marked as spam just 2 hours after being posted, looks like mother russia must be backing my poinr
@franknbeans4761 From what I've read the frontal RCS of the F-22 is much smaller than the PAK. I even read an article where Russian officals said that the PAK doesn't currently meet the definition of a 5th gen fighter, and one of the reasons is it's not stealthy enough. Another reason is because it's avionics aren't up to such standards.
@TheTequilaShooter That is actually fairly believable. I heard they were having problems making the cockpit stealthy. Also, the rear-top area of the engines seem completely exposed & lacking RAM.
And former deputy defense minister Vitaly Shlykov has "cast doubt on the industrial capacity of Russia to produce the aircraft in significant numbers."
It is also stated that India is responsible for 35% of it's funding. So if they drop out for say, the F-35, the whole program is lost.
@franknbeans4761 The PAK FA is just prototype, the final production version will fix all those problems ,and you got your numbers wrong, India is responsible for 25% of the funding not 35%. Russia has 565 billion in currency reserves so even if India drops out, it will have no problem funding the program. Talking about engines did know that PAK FA 5th generation engine being developed right now called item 129 will have 20% more trust then F-119.
@Russiasuperpower1 Yes, it is way too soon to give any real estimation as to who is better. Which is what I said in other comments.
I did get the % of Indian funding wrong though. And I imagine that all the problems will be fixed. It is just annoying when people say plane A is better than plane B. Especially when not a lot is really even known about either.
@Russiasuperpower1 I have some serious doubts about the PAK's engine power especially considering the latest news releases about the troubles developing it's engines. There's even doubt that they might never get produced. We'll see...
And, how the heck are they going to "fix all those problems"? Tech doesn't just magically appear. It takes many years. Heck, Russia still hasn't even fielded it first generation AESA. I believe the US is now on its 4th to 5th. It takes time.
@Russiasuperpower1 Your link refers to the second stage of development, which is shere they are having difficulty: "Although the first stage of research and development has been successfully completed for the 117 family of engines for the Su-35S and T-50 aircraft, it is unclear whether it will prove possible to create a full-fledged fifth-generation engine for the PAK FA second stage." thefrontierpost. com/?p=51566
im not retarded, i listed some minor facts, the stupid americans go and release facts about: radar range, radar strength, the problemt they had with comunication between F-22 and AWACS, the unsucessful tests of the
AIM-120C air to air missile with a larger frontal fin and even the infrared missile guidence system that wouldnt pick up a drone, all these were mentioned in an episode of future weapons and planes that never flew (focusing on the YF-23 and 22 development)...
@warriorxp111 Well, the problem with stealth aircraft is that they have to remain hidden. So they won't communicate with AWACS planes & AWACS planes can't detect them with their radar, so yes, they would have communications problems.
And just so you know, I wouldn't base your conclusions on future weapons.
Nothing has really been given away about the F-22 in general. Not a whole lot is known about it so I can't say they gave any secrets away.
@warriorxp111 Dude the Amraam works just fine. And the BS about the F-22 not being able to communicate is just that, BS. According to former Air Force ISR chief, Lt. Gen. David Deptula, "F-22s can communicate securely just fine with other aircraft," writes Deptula. You may be talking about data links, but if you applied that standard (multi-connectivity of all aircraft tied together by common data link) then many of the aircraft flying in the coalition would fail in that ability, also?"
russia releases some info on an engine problem, USA goes out and tells TV shows about all the problems they have with the F-22 then allows the show to release detailed info on radar effectiveness, sounds pretty stupid to me
@warriorxp111 Hahahahha, you dumb ass you do not know the top speed of the Raptor! you read an estimate on wiki and then like the idiot you are quote it as a fact. NONE of the performance specs of the Raptor have been made public.....now go back into your closet!
@warriorxp111 I was trying to be nice in last post. Let's just put it this way, Fucktard, the speed of the Mighty F-22, Worlds ONLY Gen 5 Fighter Jet in operational status, is CLASSIFIED! No you DUMBASS, you do NOT know the true speed or capabilities of the Amazing F-22. Now go talk your shit to the little boys down the street. Cause I don't have time to entertain FOOLS like you! Be Gone!
why is it u fat bastard pro american spakers are so full of your selfs that u cant take it when something is better that your shit. for fuck sake, u stupid twats mistook squadrens of japanise planes as your own. i read in my aviation book that u stupid sods told britain that we couldnt get a vulcan long range bomber anywhere near your coast in the cold war, u headcases didnt know it was there until it was directly over washington. america just cant see it is slowly fucking up
@warriorxp111 Dude, u r a mental case. We're only talking about the F-22 here, not EVERYTHING. Yes, the F-22 is the best A2A fighter in the world. Get over it. Is it the best A2G, NO. We're not saying everything in the US is the best, it's just your narrowsighted opinion that comes to that conclusion. &for you to say the J-20 is better is a laughing joke, and I think you know better. There's speculation that it might just be a test-bed aircraft that doesn't go into production. We'll see.
@warriorxp111 your from uk and you call Americans "fat bastards"? So funny, LOL! Go take your bald crooked tooth fat ass, and look in the mirror at your national image. WOW!
i do have doubts about china having the ability to keep developing and improving the J-20. if they have to get parts from other countries then it will make life so much more difficult for them
it will also have the same, probobly better stability and extreem maneuverability capabilities. The F-22 pratt and whitney F119-PW-100 engines put out 35,000lb of thrust per engine where as the PAK FA T-50
AL-41-F1 engines put out around 38,000lb of thrust per engine. the F-22 has a range of 2000miles and the T-50 has a range of 3500. and you said i cant tell you why its superior
@warriorxp111 The Mighty F-22 is the only 5th Gen Fighter Aircraft period. Hahahaha, russia is left with a pile of rusting delapatated legacy planes. So funny! Now russia tries to build pak fart, but cannot get the engines to work. First they downgrade them, so all specs are way over rated and now the downgraded POS engine catches on fire in front of everyone. you people are a joke, and so funny to watch. hahahahahahah
I'm looking forward to seeing the T-50 do some impressive turns like the prototype SU-37. I haven't even seen it do a hard and fast vertical turn like the F-22 Raptor. It could be that the SU-37 was JUST a prototype like the X-31.
@eag11e Oh wow he can read.. Im glad you noticed my mistake and got my point.. Yuor a Bicth! U get that too? Copy what i say and word it differently...lol haha Good job man i actually clapped for you on that one. your one of those faggot white boys that keeps naggin til you get your ass wooped..lol man i wish i can reach you through this screen and stomp ur face out then write RUSSIA on your forhead! Your by far the lamest little bitch on youtube!
Who gives a crap about superior warplanes when you have other ways of "waging war" that don't involve millions of dollars in research&development, like economic warfare? Read "The Zion Protocols" or Sun Tzu's"The art of war" for reference on this.
@eag11e Your lame as fuck get a life and lear how to write a good come back comment andmake sure that it makes sense. Ur a sad and a discrace to ur country! Ur getting schooled in ur own language pussy. I understand, id be mad too! Bitch!!!!
@23mikemack What does lear how to write mean? Apparently your English sucks! Hahahahaha. your post makes absolutely no sense. you are like a little tiny girl who has lost her temper. So funny!
@Nickael7 LOL, No people willingly give me there money. And, they are more than happy with what they get in return. I can teach even you how to become wealthy beyond your wildest imagination. But, it is better for you to remain poor. It is your place.
@Nickael7 Hahahaha, yes you are correct in the sense I do not have a job working for someone else like your stupid ass does. I do not subject myself to working for other people. I only work for myself. I have no Boss, like you do. your life must really suck!
@Nickael7 Wow, I see you are full of your self. so you own a failed business and have no one to sell your toys to. Who cares. you work for others and are repaid in pittance. Go and learn how to make something of yourself other than internet troll and toy maker.
@Nickael7 Jesus will you ever stop? You say he is the king of trollers when you always pull things out your ass. You are an idiot. And by the way, you are also very pathetic for blocking me to try to shut me out. Nice job running from your problems. Kind of like how when I would prove you wrong, you would randomly say the BRIC would crush the US. You are insane.
@Nickael7 Aren't you only 14? That is what you have told me. Or which brother is this?
Remember how you told me I was "NAZI WHITE TRASH SCUM THAT CAME TO INVADE US IN EL SALVADOR AND GOOD FOR THEM" in your personal message to me? You are just a nut job.
Keep running from your problems.
And stop talking smack on the Abrams vs T-90 video. You are like a disease that just won't go away.
@TheTequilaShooter lOL, nickali told me he made 1.5 million a year as a robotic engineer. I believe it was him that designed that armatron thing in the canadian olympics. The one where the arm wouldn't work and the whole damn thing sat there embarrassing the whole canadian country of goof balls. Nice........
@eag11e Too bad, not only the PAK-FA makes your plastic F-35 and F-22 toys look like sjit, now the T-90MS overpowers your M1A2 TUSK, better hurry up with that M1A3 pal!
usa your time is over. China - Russia - Germany - India. - And this is it... for you this is it. Time of your dirty empire will soon be over. BYE BYE - murders!
airforliferomario 3 days ago
bye bye USA! russia,china,germany= new world superpowers haha!
MultiAbdelrahim 4 days ago
Russia...The way they test things is to see how many test pilots they kill until it comes down to a reasonable number.
rsilver1211 1 week ago
By the end, the ruble collapsed as Soviet consumers turned to imports to satisfy their needs. They could not buy a good pair of leather boots or a good television set or a computer made in the Soviet Union, because all the boots and the electronics were swallowed up by military procurement. And, needless to say, there were no quality goods to export in order to balance imports.
rsilver1211 1 week ago
The immediate cause of the Soviet collapse was economic, as the Soviet Union lost the arms race and international competition with the West. The United States was able to profit from its imperialist exploitation of other countries, while socialism could only lose economically in that competition.
rsilver1211 1 week ago
The collapse of the Soviet Union at the end of the 1980's was a great blow to the hopes of revolutionaries. Why did it collapse? The primary causes were political and economic and they were the result of the culture of war.
rsilver1211 1 week ago
Stealth? I dont know... the radar (computer) and the thrust vectoring on the after burners (engines) is what got my attention.
This already out turns the F22?
DarkPrinceNH5570 1 week ago
What? Did I see a set of parachutes to land or was that typical BS (ours goes so fast we need parachutes to stop it!) LOL
I gotta say they sure do look like the F-22s, like the much copied F-15 design of the past (cough cough).
Anyway, the future is unmanned fighters launched by a mothership (if you will) - they are small, fast, and able to withstand ridiculous g-forces.
AmericannPie08 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Amazing. Check out my video response for the timeline for Su fighters from 1940s till today in my channel. From Su 2 in 1939 till 2016, where this monster will soar the skies
BisherDeirki 2 weeks ago
Wont be ready until 2015- 2017 The F22 and 35 are ready now.
rsilver1211 2 weeks ago
@rsilver1211 Eh? The russia airforce is waiting for 2014 to get some T-50.
jaromT 1 week ago
@rsilver1211 F-22 ready, but does US budget ready for such expensive jets?
US military spendings with supplies, veterans payments, energy dept over than 1.2 trillion
And Lokcheed prepared new toy for 200 mln. $ per one unit.
We in Russia already know what is that military tech which country can not afford to itself.
And when F-35 will be in US Army your country should prepare itself for a new war for democracy...Because Wall Street in some way need return their military founds.
mphet26 1 week ago
@mphet26 Did you every notice that Russia has been backing terrorists like for as long as I could remember.
rsilver1211 1 week ago
@mphet26 Who is Backing the Terrorists in Syria?
rsilver1211 1 week ago
@mphet26 Moscow Times reported on Feb. 8 that the inclusion of FSB chief Fradkov in the Russian trip to Syria with Foreign Minister Lavrov shows how important Syria is to Russia's strategic interest. Igor Korotchenko, a military expert and an editor of the Natsionalnaya Oborona magazine, is quoted saying that "Russia can provide Assad intelligence information that foreign countries might be behind the opposition."
rsilver1211 1 week ago
@rsilver1211 hello, stupid spamer.
mphet26 1 week ago
@mphet26 Enjoy Living in Russia? Good stay there.
rsilver1211 1 week ago
@rsilver1211 Not in this century... Russian is too small after collapse of USSR...
mphet26 1 week ago
FAKE!
darnel605 3 weeks ago
Argh, my bad. I Meant the Su 47. Golden Eagle. I dont know why I thought it was named FoxHound. -..-
devinhallsworth 3 weeks ago
@devinhallsworth su47 was abandoned because of catastrophic wing cracks. russians do not possess the materials or technology to make successful forward swept wings.
eag11e 3 weeks ago
@eag11e Really? I'd never actually heard that in the stuff Ive read about the plane. Makes sense though, thanks for filling me in!
devinhallsworth 2 weeks ago
I wish they'd kept designing the Foxhound. Now that plane was hella interesting and unique. I mean come on russia, you really need to have more faith in your own designs instead of just trying to reverse engineer your own F 22.
devinhallsworth 3 weeks ago
Cool a new plane. As an American, I'm supposed to be scared? Why? We know barely anything about this plane. Keep crying kids.
BXAssasinatorXS 3 weeks ago
Why fix it if it's not broken. I still think the MIG 29 are a one of the greats aircraft ever built and SU-27.
clsmz 1 month ago
0:04 FAIL! that's the F-22 at the background
dakiler2028 1 month ago
@dakiler2028 no dude its not, look closely on the engines.
PutinIsABitch 1 month ago
Comment removed
FRgod 1 month ago
Comment removed
FRgod 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PutinIsABitch No dude, if you look at the Pak Fa T-50 engines, you see there's a triangular piece between them. 0:04 compared to 0:46
The journalist kinda failed there.
FRgod 1 month ago
Comment removed
PutinIsABitch 1 month ago
@dakiler2028 That's an older 5th generation study by Sukhoi that was abandoned.
vukashin88 1 month ago
lol at all the angry americans haha!!
AnthonyB465 1 month ago
@AnthonyB465 Where do you live in the Toilet?
rsilver1211 1 week ago
@rsilver1211 LOL No... What's that got to do with what I said?
AnthonyB465 1 week ago
@AnthonyB465 You did not answe my question....Where do you live that you are saying angry Americans
rsilver1211 1 week ago
@rsilver1211 No I do not live in a toilet.
AnthonyB465 1 week ago
@AnthonyB465 Why don't you want to say where you live?
rsilver1211 1 week ago
@rsilver1211 Why do you want to know where I live? And I live in the U.K
AnthonyB465 1 week ago
@AnthonyB465 You say you live in the UK but you are anti American and pro Russia?
rsilver1211 1 week ago
@rsilver1211 Nope I'm not anti American , nor am I pro Russia. I actually like America more than most country's.
AnthonyB465 6 days ago
Russia has much better fighters than USA ones ... CRY BITCHES !!!
daniGRewc 1 month ago 11
@daniGRewc haha ya its true. I didnt even know about the T50 and this was on NEWS over seas? Holy shit... alls I had to do was see something on T50 and saw it on F22. T50 out does F22 in something which all SIM pilots prefer. Personally I dont care Im all for giving you a run for your money.
Im not sure if it does but just looking at it on a YOUTUBE video. I bet it does.
DarkPrinceNH5570 1 month ago
@daniGRewc cool story, bro
BXAssasinatorXS 3 weeks ago
@daniGRewc Stunning performances, on paper, as usual...
Let' s this thing face a French Rafale. Surprise, surprise...
F22 pilots would tell you a lot about Rafale (if they could,
beause officially they "won" their confrontation by 1-0,
My foot. French pilots have a clear kill proof on the F-22).
QuicksortX64 1 week ago
@daniGRewc Now all they need to do is something good in the world Like take out Iran instead of backing them. Russia Sucks and you know it.
rsilver1211 1 week ago
@daniGRewc What do they do with them?
rsilver1211 1 week ago
Мне как-то похер что америкосы бормочат, Россия всегда будет лучше!
CriticalPerception 1 month ago
I already caught onto the exhaust. Thats why F22 is like that sacraficing "dancing" capability.
Just load the jet up with chaff. Top left and right and bottom left and right. Im sure someone can design this. There has always been ways to evade missles and so on. Heat detection thing ya they will pick you up on radar. Theres ways to evade radar too. Always has been ways to do this. lol
DarkPrinceNH5570 1 month ago
yes yes its cost very cheap compared whit the f22 because they pay whit food to the russian people ! Welcome to the comunist!!! PIRATES....
x0lox 1 month ago 4
you guys russophobes
kolysha 1 month ago
Oh Wow! Russia! you got a big dick! Congrats.. Now put it back in your pants.
Friedstuffsable 2 months ago
Looks like the shape of the aircraft was copied from the YF 23...
PeytonManningguy 2 months ago
@MrGgff32 Boring!
darnel605 2 months ago
The Russians have lost that battle long time ago. They should better buy the Eurofighter :-)
grosquipue 2 months ago
This aircraft is quite attractive in the looks department. It is very much up for debate what the RCS of the aircraft is? The skin is clearly metalic and has no radar absorbant coating applied but this is still a proto-type. Secondly an earlier post noted the conventional engine exhaust. This too is very poor on the RCS scale. Third, no room for internal stores. Completely negates any RCS bonus the aircraft had if you have to store your weapons on pylons. A+ on looks but F-22 superior.
HornetVF103 2 months ago
@HornetVF103 Exhaust shape is more about IR than RCS; F-22's rectangular exhaust is covered in heat-absorbing materials to mask IR. PAK-FA is meant to be less stealthy and more agile, like the F-22 was vs the YF-23. It's said to have two internal bays at ~4.6x1.1 metres, possibly with a set of side bays for R-73's like the F-22 has for AIM-9's. It's said to have 6 external hardpoints, much like the F-22's 4. Research is going into stealthy weapons pods and fuel tanks on both sides to use these.
TheRunefox 2 months ago
When the Alien come, it does not matter what generation, you are all get FUCKED.
moistfaucet 2 months ago
@moistfaucet xD
DarkPrinceNH5570 1 month ago
Looks like a mix between the F-22 and YF-23. The rear exhausts don't look typical to "stealth" designs, but since I honestly wouldn't have any way of proving that, it's just my opinion.
RaaronR 2 months ago
@RaaronR how are the RUSSIANS COPY CATS? HUH THEY MAKE THERE OWN SHIT CHINA JUST COPIES EVERYTHING........
fire8746 2 months ago
@fire8746 I didn't claim they are copy cats, I just said it looks like a mix between the F-22 and YF-23. Far as "copy cats" comment, you must not know much about WW2. Russia had a technology boom after WW2, through a combination of US assistance (we helped with planes and radios) and capture of German rocket scientists after the war. This is not an insult to Russia!. This is what any wise country would do to advance technology.
RaaronR 2 months ago
looks too much like an F-22.The Su-47 is more of an original design. The Chinese and Russians are copy cats.
miamimilk 2 months ago
@miamimilk Hi, Welcome to the world of weapons devellopment.
benusmc6154 2 months ago
@MrGgff32 So what?
darnel605 2 months ago
@MrGgff32 With what?
darnel605 2 months ago
@C4P1T4L15M I know certain stuff, but aswell, even an elder may not have knowledge in aerospace engineering.
RockRebel1998 2 months ago
@C4P1T4L15M Well, unlike eag11e, you had the brains to figure it out :D Well, ofcourse, you cant just go ahead and judge by the age, even a 13 year old can be more educated and smart than a 51 year old.
RockRebel1998 2 months ago
This is just a mock-up. I doubt they can build more than 2 working models.
darnel605 3 months ago
I enjoy watching the video of pak fat 50 catching on fire....OMG, so funny. I see this engine problem with pak fat 50 is more serious than originally thought. And now with the phase 2 engine in redesign, it is doubtful pak fat will ever reach or meet it's advertised specs. BTW...how is that AESA Radar coming along? LOL
eag11e 3 months ago
it's just a fucking cheap copy of the F22 USA is alway the first in everything... ;-)
emachete1 3 months ago
@ 1:47, SU 47 Berkut looks way cooler, think id rather have one of those lol...t50 rocks anyway
sesamestreetsquad 3 months ago
if usa has one, russians had to have one. balance of terror. i whuld not be suprised if this thing is more advanced then f-22. this one is newer. then america starts the 6th generation and they have the most advanced planes of planet for that time. then russians make one. and then next gen, and so on and so on.
gethsoftware 3 months ago
!:30
Defence against who?? Aliens?
mininow 3 months ago
is this to be the su-50?
TheNinjaCowboys 3 months ago
any model that is meant to be good! he will have some properties of f-22 f-22 because it is a model created by computer programs that if I'm not mistaken, "and all computer makes everyone knows is great to lol"
fabriciobrisola1 3 months ago
THE F-22 HAD COMMUNICATION PROBLEMS WITH THE AWACS IN TRAINING MISSIONS OVER THE GULF OF MEXIXO, FOX NEWS THEN TOLD THE WORLD.
THE AIM-120C WAS ORIGIONALY DESIGNED TO HAVE THE SAME FRONTAL FIN AS THE AIM-120A/B BUT THE ENGINEERS WERE TO STUPID TO REALISE IT WOULDNT FIT IN THE INTERNAL WEAPONS BAY.
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 So what, the Amraam can now be loaded no problem onto the F-22. Problems happen. That's why there are exercises...to discover them before going into real combat. You don't think Russia has problems of its own with its military weapons and aircraft. You're sadly mistaken, if that's the case.
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
yea, russia doesnt let their news channels tell the worls
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 Sure they do... and in many instances. Just look at the failures with bulava missile, or the groundings of over 75% of the Mig 29 fleet, plus many more. It's just that you have a lopsided anti-US opinion.
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter The F-22 has demonstrated it's ability to employ all of it's weapons at high supersonic speeds. No russian aircraft and certainly the euro fighter have ever demonstrated the same ability. Amraam works just fine on F-22.
eag11e 3 months ago
@eag11e Yea, I know. When you ask them to support something they say with proof, i.e a valid source, they change the subject. Oh well.... Nice to see someone here with logic and reasoning.
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter Yes, it is funny to see semi retarded ruskies try so hard to be somebody by posting bull shit on fcuktube. I am beginning to realize the failed russian government education system is producing idiots who are not capable of functioning in the real world. No wonder the ussr failed so badly! And the current russian economy is in 3rd world status. Most of these embaciles are to stupid to feel ashamed for their failures, rather they brag about them. LOL!
eag11e 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
chinas J-20 would fuck the F-20JEW sideways. they have the economy to build more aswell and will never be short of pilots. there government isnt a ZOG either so they dont make military cuts to save money
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 Here are some facts about the J-20 dumbass, and from a Russian source: "Electronic equipment, primarily radar, in China stands at approximately the same level as its engines. Chinese designs fall short of the capabilities of their Russian, European and American counterparts. A fifth-generation stealth fighter must be able to evade radar, and so it must be made from modern composite materials. However, China does not produce such materials in commercial amounts, and experts
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
doubt that it can develop and produce them for its Air Force. The guided weapons used in the Chinese Air Force were mostly copied from U.S., Israeli and Russian prototypes made in the 1960s through 1980s. China will have to spend a great deal of time and effort to develop its own weapons, even if it borrows elements of prototypes bought from other countries."
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 china has produced no engines for their f20. The only engines tested in it were russian! So china will only produce as many j20s as russia lets them. And I assure you, Fucktard, it will not be very many! Are you really as stupid as your posts indicate? Or did someone have you post your shit as a joke? I'm thinking your posts are just a joke. you could not be able to even type on a keyboard and write the stupid shit you post here.
eag11e 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
your just a stupid pro american. fuck america. america should never have got indipendance from the UK. america has a ZOG government FUCK AMERICA
warriorxp111 3 months ago
Comment removed
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
we will see about the J-20 production, no doubt it will be a good aircraft if it is brought into service though
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 OMG, when and if? you even have your doubts about the j20! The chinks need to learn how to make engines. Until then they will have no viable air force. And, that is not going to happen any time soon!
eag11e 3 months ago
ohh my gosh... the debates which fighter is better are still goin..!! what a waste of time. But still funny.
rulezz123 3 months ago
The quote about the PAK engine trouble is from the Moscow Times. Here's one link about the F-22's engines, inlcuding stats on its thrust: pw .utc. com/media_center/assets/me_f119_product_card. pdf
You can also find the same info at the USAF Fact Sheet on the F-22 at af.mil/information/factsheets/factsheet. asp?id=199
It's not easy to find stat sheets on the PAK, unless perhaps you know Russian, so unfortunatley the only source I could find was Wiki. What's your source for the
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
38,000lb of thrust per engine? And, is that engine in service, or is it based on projections of the engine under development?
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
FYI, I did find this on the PAK's engines, which is contrary to your info: "The PAK FA will use on its first flights 2 Saturn 117S engines (about 14.5 tons of thrust each). The 117S is an advanced version of the AL-31F, but built with the experience gained in the AL-41F program. The Saturn AL-41F powered the Mikoyan MFI fighter (Project/Article 1.44). Later versions of the PAK FA will use a completely new engine (17.5 tons of thrust each), developed by NPO Saturn or FGUP MMPP Salyut."
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
Source pravda. ru/russia/economics/28-01-2010/111914-fifth_generation-0/
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
And finally, here's a link that shows the speed and range of the Pak and F-22 are rougly equal, but it's based on the PAK getting new engines, which we'll hae to wait and see: en .rian. ru/infographics/20100219/157939986. html
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
i was discussing the subject with a friend last night and we both concluded that we wont know which is better until they are in combat with each other, to me that sounds like a perfectly reasonalbe conclusion
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
big deal, it might not have stealth or thrust vectiring, it has a better turning capability than the F-22 without thrust vectoring, what does that say about the F-22's thrust vectors, waste of time. but we have pilots trained to the highest standard. the US simply puts as many units as possible on the battlefield. just think what would happen if the US went to war with China, China would win on man power alone. one of our Eurofighter pilots would treat an F-22 as training
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 [it has a better turning capability than the F-22 without thrust vectoring] What proof do you have, & is it with the EF flying unrealistically clean or w/ stores?
[Eurofighter pilots would treat an F-22 as training] Hey, I actually like the EF, but don't BS around. Your EF lost to the Rafale 7-1 in UAE, lost 3-0 to Paki F-16's, and avoided engaging the F-22 in UAE after they saw them beat all other opponents, & w/ rookie F-22 pilots behind the stick, too.
China?? HAHA
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago 2
@TheTequilaShooter
dont know where u get it from but paki F-16s and rafale have never fought, can u not realise yet u r just a little fan boy, go and play some ace combat or sumet
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 U relly are a dip-shit. Read up on the UAE exercises where the EF lost over and over to the Rafale. And, yes, Paki F-16's beat the EF three times with zero losses. And, the J-20 sucks ass. Even Russian's are lauging at it. I'm tired of your anti-US bullcrap. All talk, no facts, just bullshit time & time again.
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
our eurofighter typhoon has a tighter minimum radius turn than the F-22 and they dont have thrust vectoring
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 Got proof to back that up? And, is the EF flying clean?
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 The eurofighter doesn't have TV as you say. It also does not have Stealth!
eag11e 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
also from projections conducted by sukhoi PAK FA T-50 only costs around 50 million dollars where as the F-22 costs around 140 million dollars. the PAK's overall program cost is around 8 billion dollars where as the F-22 project costs 60 billion. i think that the PAK is what the yankees call "more bang for your buck". less cost=more units and more money to spend on improvements and modifications
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 From what I've read is that the Pak will cost ~100 mil, and that figure is likely to go up, like the cost of most aircraft do over time.
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 your theory of more bang for the buck seems logical. But when the USA has a defense budget of over 650 Billion Dollars and russias defense budget is only around 50 Billion Dollars. The unit cost becomes mute!
eag11e 3 months ago
why is it all the american fan boys come and try and fail to prove the F-22 is better than russian aircraft, its just not true
warriorxp111 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@warriorxp111 Then why don't you tell us how the T-50 is superior? You can't, and you know it.
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
no becausenot much information has been released to the general pubic because russia, unlike the stupid americans, does not make the mistake of bragging to the world about new tech allowing other nations to counter it. i know that the F-22 raptor has a top speed of 1500mph and the PAK FA T-50 has a top speed of 1560-1600 mph. it also has a climb rate of 68,900ft/min. well in excess of most aircraft. judging by the fact that the design is similar to the MIG-29 and SU-27...
warriorxp111 4 months ago
@warriorxp111 Actually, the top speed of the F-22 is still classified; therefore, so much on your theory that we brag about it. + you'll find times where the actual ablities of our weapons published are understated. You never want to tell your foes the true abilites, and of couse won't make all of it public. The PAK's power projections that you cited are based on its getting new engines, where these is now some doubt will occur. In addition, the range of the PAk is projected to be ~as the
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
F-22, but that' with the PAK getting its new engines. Now when it comes to stealth, avionics, plus the fact that the F-22 is already in service and has done outstanding in exercises, gives it a huge edge. The PAK has a long way to go.
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
In addition to my earlier comments, your thrust figures are wrong:
Al-41F-1 147 kN (33,000 lbf)
P&W F-119 35,000 lbf (160 kN)
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
It took me a little time, but here's a quote: "Finally, major questions remain regarding Russia’s production of military aircraft engines. Although the first stage of research and development has been successfully completed for the 117 family of engines for the Su-35S and T-50 aircraft, it is unclear whether it will prove possible to create a full-fledged fifth-generation engine for the PAK FA second stage. The obstacle is not a lack of funding or innovative capacity
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
at the Saturn plant, but the need for basic technologies — especially in materials science — that could require a great deal of time and money to develop." cast. ru/eng/?id=426
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
what are your sources?
and going on the fact that your origional reply has been marked as spam just 2 hours after being posted, looks like mother russia must be backing my poinr
warriorxp111 4 months ago
@warriorxp111 Sources to what? That the development of engines isn't going so well, or the thrust figures that I provided?
My comments are probably marked SPAM because many Russian fanbois don't like to read the truth.
TheTequilaShooter 4 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
yea, well what sources are u getting your information from? dont tell me wikipedia or u will automaticaly be classed as an idiot lol
warriorxp111 4 months ago
@warriorxp111 Are you retarded?
You say Russia doesn't release information on the T-50 but then listed off several statistics. Get a life.
How do you know the T-50 is stealthier than the F-22? In terms of frontal RCS, they are roughly equal. But in a 3 dimensional sense, no way.
The T-50 is having a lot of engine troubles so don't go off & say it is in any way better when it is still a developing aircraft.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 From what I've read the frontal RCS of the F-22 is much smaller than the PAK. I even read an article where Russian officals said that the PAK doesn't currently meet the definition of a 5th gen fighter, and one of the reasons is it's not stealthy enough. Another reason is because it's avionics aren't up to such standards.
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter That is actually fairly believable. I heard they were having problems making the cockpit stealthy. Also, the rear-top area of the engines seem completely exposed & lacking RAM.
And former deputy defense minister Vitaly Shlykov has "cast doubt on the industrial capacity of Russia to produce the aircraft in significant numbers."
It is also stated that India is responsible for 35% of it's funding. So if they drop out for say, the F-35, the whole program is lost.
franknbeans4761 3 months ago
@franknbeans4761 The PAK FA is just prototype, the final production version will fix all those problems ,and you got your numbers wrong, India is responsible for 25% of the funding not 35%. Russia has 565 billion in currency reserves so even if India drops out, it will have no problem funding the program. Talking about engines did know that PAK FA 5th generation engine being developed right now called item 129 will have 20% more trust then F-119.
Russiasuperpower1 3 months ago
@Russiasuperpower1 Yes, it is way too soon to give any real estimation as to who is better. Which is what I said in other comments.
I did get the % of Indian funding wrong though. And I imagine that all the problems will be fixed. It is just annoying when people say plane A is better than plane B. Especially when not a lot is really even known about either.
franknbeans4761 3 months ago
@franknbeans4761 I will send a link on engines too.
Russiasuperpower1 3 months ago
@Russiasuperpower1 I have some serious doubts about the PAK's engine power especially considering the latest news releases about the troubles developing it's engines. There's even doubt that they might never get produced. We'll see...
And, how the heck are they going to "fix all those problems"? Tech doesn't just magically appear. It takes many years. Heck, Russia still hasn't even fielded it first generation AESA. I believe the US is now on its 4th to 5th. It takes time.
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter Ok then I will send you a link.
Russiasuperpower1 3 months ago
@Russiasuperpower1 Your link refers to the second stage of development, which is shere they are having difficulty: "Although the first stage of research and development has been successfully completed for the 117 family of engines for the Su-35S and T-50 aircraft, it is unclear whether it will prove possible to create a full-fledged fifth-generation engine for the PAK FA second stage." thefrontierpost. com/?p=51566
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@franknbeans4761
im not retarded, i listed some minor facts, the stupid americans go and release facts about: radar range, radar strength, the problemt they had with comunication between F-22 and AWACS, the unsucessful tests of the
AIM-120C air to air missile with a larger frontal fin and even the infrared missile guidence system that wouldnt pick up a drone, all these were mentioned in an episode of future weapons and planes that never flew (focusing on the YF-23 and 22 development)...
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 Well, the problem with stealth aircraft is that they have to remain hidden. So they won't communicate with AWACS planes & AWACS planes can't detect them with their radar, so yes, they would have communications problems.
And just so you know, I wouldn't base your conclusions on future weapons.
Nothing has really been given away about the F-22 in general. Not a whole lot is known about it so I can't say they gave any secrets away.
franknbeans4761 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 Dude the Amraam works just fine. And the BS about the F-22 not being able to communicate is just that, BS. According to former Air Force ISR chief, Lt. Gen. David Deptula, "F-22s can communicate securely just fine with other aircraft," writes Deptula. You may be talking about data links, but if you applied that standard (multi-connectivity of all aircraft tied together by common data link) then many of the aircraft flying in the coalition would fail in that ability, also?"
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@franknbeans4761
russia releases some info on an engine problem, USA goes out and tells TV shows about all the problems they have with the F-22 then allows the show to release detailed info on radar effectiveness, sounds pretty stupid to me
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 Hahahahha, you dumb ass you do not know the top speed of the Raptor! you read an estimate on wiki and then like the idiot you are quote it as a fact. NONE of the performance specs of the Raptor have been made public.....now go back into your closet!
eag11e 3 months ago
@eag11e
no, i read multiple aviation books to reasearch the top speed of the F-20JEW raptor (pile of yankee shit)
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 I was trying to be nice in last post. Let's just put it this way, Fucktard, the speed of the Mighty F-22, Worlds ONLY Gen 5 Fighter Jet in operational status, is CLASSIFIED! No you DUMBASS, you do NOT know the true speed or capabilities of the Amazing F-22. Now go talk your shit to the little boys down the street. Cause I don't have time to entertain FOOLS like you! Be Gone!
eag11e 3 months ago
@eag11e
why is it u fat bastard pro american spakers are so full of your selfs that u cant take it when something is better that your shit. for fuck sake, u stupid twats mistook squadrens of japanise planes as your own. i read in my aviation book that u stupid sods told britain that we couldnt get a vulcan long range bomber anywhere near your coast in the cold war, u headcases didnt know it was there until it was directly over washington. america just cant see it is slowly fucking up
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 Dude, u r a mental case. We're only talking about the F-22 here, not EVERYTHING. Yes, the F-22 is the best A2A fighter in the world. Get over it. Is it the best A2G, NO. We're not saying everything in the US is the best, it's just your narrowsighted opinion that comes to that conclusion. &for you to say the J-20 is better is a laughing joke, and I think you know better. There's speculation that it might just be a test-bed aircraft that doesn't go into production. We'll see.
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 your from uk and you call Americans "fat bastards"? So funny, LOL! Go take your bald crooked tooth fat ass, and look in the mirror at your national image. WOW!
eag11e 3 months ago
@eag11e
i do have doubts about china having the ability to keep developing and improving the J-20. if they have to get parts from other countries then it will make life so much more difficult for them
warriorxp111 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter
it will also have the same, probobly better stability and extreem maneuverability capabilities. The F-22 pratt and whitney F119-PW-100 engines put out 35,000lb of thrust per engine where as the PAK FA T-50
AL-41-F1 engines put out around 38,000lb of thrust per engine. the F-22 has a range of 2000miles and the T-50 has a range of 3500. and you said i cant tell you why its superior
warriorxp111 4 months ago
@warriorxp111 pakfart engines have already demonstrated how well they burn on the runway.......so sad!
eag11e 3 months ago
@warriorxp111 Prove otherwise, and usually, it's pro-Russians that bash American equipment in the first place.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@warriorxp111 The Mighty F-22 is the only 5th Gen Fighter Aircraft period. Hahahaha, russia is left with a pile of rusting delapatated legacy planes. So funny! Now russia tries to build pak fart, but cannot get the engines to work. First they downgrade them, so all specs are way over rated and now the downgraded POS engine catches on fire in front of everyone. you people are a joke, and so funny to watch. hahahahahahah
eag11e 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I'm looking forward to seeing the T-50 do some impressive turns like the prototype SU-37. I haven't even seen it do a hard and fast vertical turn like the F-22 Raptor. It could be that the SU-37 was JUST a prototype like the X-31.
MrGriff305 4 months ago
Love flying it in Ace Combat Assault Horizon. ^_^
266BULLDOG 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HAHAHA THAT WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT!!!! GO RUSSIA GO!!!!!!
sergeikozin47 4 months ago
@eag11e Oh wow he can read.. Im glad you noticed my mistake and got my point.. Yuor a Bicth! U get that too? Copy what i say and word it differently...lol haha Good job man i actually clapped for you on that one. your one of those faggot white boys that keeps naggin til you get your ass wooped..lol man i wish i can reach you through this screen and stomp ur face out then write RUSSIA on your forhead! Your by far the lamest little bitch on youtube!
23mikemack 4 months ago
Who gives a crap about superior warplanes when you have other ways of "waging war" that don't involve millions of dollars in research&development, like economic warfare? Read "The Zion Protocols" or Sun Tzu's"The art of war" for reference on this.
luisengineer23 4 months ago
@eag11e Your lame as fuck get a life and lear how to write a good come back comment andmake sure that it makes sense. Ur a sad and a discrace to ur country! Ur getting schooled in ur own language pussy. I understand, id be mad too! Bitch!!!!
23mikemack 4 months ago
@23mikemack What does lear how to write mean? Apparently your English sucks! Hahahahaha. your post makes absolutely no sense. you are like a little tiny girl who has lost her temper. So funny!
eag11e 4 months ago
@eag11e You don't have a job do you ???
Nickael7 4 months ago
@Nickael7 No I am independently wealthy!
eag11e 4 months ago
@eag11e That means you steal money from others.
Nickael7 4 months ago
@Nickael7 LOL, No people willingly give me there money. And, they are more than happy with what they get in return. I can teach even you how to become wealthy beyond your wildest imagination. But, it is better for you to remain poor. It is your place.
eag11e 4 months ago
@eag11e What childish brain you have. Troll, you're in the welfare !!! Jobless.
Nickael7 4 months ago
@Nickael7 Hahahaha, yes you are correct in the sense I do not have a job working for someone else like your stupid ass does. I do not subject myself to working for other people. I only work for myself. I have no Boss, like you do. your life must really suck!
eag11e 4 months ago
@eag11e Insults, insults, insults, what filled fart headed you are. I own my own business company in advance robotics, you twerp.
Nickael7 4 months ago
@Nickael7 Wow, I see you are full of your self. so you own a failed business and have no one to sell your toys to. Who cares. you work for others and are repaid in pittance. Go and learn how to make something of yourself other than internet troll and toy maker.
eag11e 4 months ago
@eag11e Each year I make 1.5 Million $ minimum. BTW, you're the king of trollers !!!
Nickael7 4 months ago
@Nickael7 Jesus will you ever stop? You say he is the king of trollers when you always pull things out your ass. You are an idiot. And by the way, you are also very pathetic for blocking me to try to shut me out. Nice job running from your problems. Kind of like how when I would prove you wrong, you would randomly say the BRIC would crush the US. You are insane.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@Nickael7 Really, that is all? Less than I thought you made. It must suck to be poor! BTW you are king of the liers! Hahahahahaha!
eag11e 4 months ago
@eag11e Actually it suck to be you ! You don't have any job and you don't have any accomplishments to show !!!
Nickael7 4 months ago
@Nickael7 Aren't you only 14? That is what you have told me. Or which brother is this?
Remember how you told me I was "NAZI WHITE TRASH SCUM THAT CAME TO INVADE US IN EL SALVADOR AND GOOD FOR THEM" in your personal message to me? You are just a nut job.
Keep running from your problems.
And stop talking smack on the Abrams vs T-90 video. You are like a disease that just won't go away.
franknbeans4761 4 months ago
@franknbeans4761 hehe It just kills me some of the retarded comments people make. That one about "NAZI WHITE TRASH ..." is a priceless example.
TheTequilaShooter 3 months ago
@TheTequilaShooter lOL, nickali told me he made 1.5 million a year as a robotic engineer. I believe it was him that designed that armatron thing in the canadian olympics. The one where the arm wouldn't work and the whole damn thing sat there embarrassing the whole canadian country of goof balls. Nice........
eag11e 3 months ago
@franknbeans4761 Listen up, we are 4 brothers. Does this respond to your minuscule NAZI brain.
Nickael7 3 months ago
@eag11e Too bad, not only the PAK-FA makes your plastic F-35 and F-22 toys look like sjit, now the T-90MS overpowers your M1A2 TUSK, better hurry up with that M1A3 pal!
Roc