Added: 3 years ago
From: PublicResourceOrg
Views: 5,049
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (6)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Wow! I totally forgot about the FAA's old SAS studies.

  • @TigerGrumman Why isn't this in airplanes today?

  • @SgtRevan:

    This is available in many commercial airframes (Part 121/135), but the technology is not the same. In commercial aviation they are typically called Full Flight Envelope Protection Systems, or LAS (Load Alleviation Systems). However, this video is about General Aviation (Part 91) and in that regulatory regime, you won't have a hard time finding impediments to actually improving flying efficiency - sometimes created by the manufacturer and sometimes by the FAA itself.

  • @SgtRevan:

    One of the other reasons has to do with the design philosophy of the manufacturer. Boeing -vs- Airbus is a great example. Airbus was not only the first commercial airframe manufacturer to do bottom-up design of commercial airframes using CATIA, but it was the first to implementation computer controlled fly-by-wire with encoded flight control limits. Boeing believes that ultimately the crew should have final control authority. So, its 777's FBW can be overridden by the crew.

  • good info!

  • loooooooool

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more