Added: 4 years ago
From: Gilmorish
Views: 90,427
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (65)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • What do you want to do ....?

  • What was the game? Bop the baloney!

  • @belinda2118 Now, that's funny. I love this movie, and I'm a professor (math).

  • She looks so old, was that the intention for the movie? She looks like a woman, not a child

  • 3 years and we still dont have the rest of the movie.........

  • All the Best Men Shave Twice A Day!

  • Ah the good old days when actors actually ate real food in scenes instead of just making it look like they're eating haha :)

  • I know the professor is a "dirty old man" but James Mason is sooo sexy.

  • Sue Lyon is the hottest girl EVER. Sue, If you're out there, I'm your BIGGEST fan and will never forget you.

  • The know-nothing U ptight S exual A ssholes will say next that no one knows enough to wank until they're 18! LOL-ita.

  • that girl (Sue Lyon) is much prettier and sweetier than 1997. She's really adorable :)

  • @Kicakicakica That's what black and white, good hair and makeup and good lighting can do. In the 1997 version, they made her look more child like, less put together and more carefree.

  • this lolita's alot sweeter and more likable than the 1997 lolita she just comes off as sort of a brat,i mean i get that shes rebellious,but it was to the point where ppl didnt like her

  • @yfset8 true Lolita was bitchy T.T trust me, I readed a book 3 times. She was a cruel kid.

  • epic green screen at 2:50

  • O.O

  • this is...

  • I thought Dominique did a better job. Sue looked much older and acted like a much more grown-up kid which I thought kinda removed some of the shock factor. Sue looks way older than she is-think it's partly the over styled hair.

  • i cant believe how mild this is...

  • The girl playing Lolita in the '97 version is bland with all the '90's affectations that you would never see in a girl from the 1940's. The practiced Angelina Jolie sleepy eyed sexiness and all knowing smarminess that makes the current crop on teen aged girls insufferable... Like, ummm.. OK?

  • i think sue lyon was gorgeous and a perfect lolita, but domique plays the role way better, as fou H.H jeremy irons is the one

  • There's definitely more chemistry between Irons and Swan.

  • The movie was controversial. The idea of an old man being obsessed with a child bothered people. You shouldn't hate the movie over something that none of the writers had control over. The best they could do was let us use our imagination as to what they did.

  • @Oukow the first intelligent answer i've seen on yt for a long time. teaching people about sexual liberation is the hardest liberation there is.

  • @Oukow umm he wasnt just obsessed they were having a relationship.

  • Sorry, my mistake....the boy was actually 4 years old...

  • In 1954, a 16 year-old girl babysitting a 5 year-old boy waited until grandmother left the house, then sexually abused the boy, at one point actually sitting on his face without panties...the grandmother came back unexpectedly and beat the .... out of her...the police were NOT called because the family feared a scandal...Incidentally, the girl was beautiful and grew up to be a stunning model....The point is, women are EXACTLY like men when it comes to getting what they want, only more devious.

  • Holy crap.

  • lol i love how they manage to disguise the the contraversy in this movie

  • What's a 'Malt'?

  • some thing along the lines of milkshakes

  • its the same thing as a milkshake... You usually make it in a blender. ^^ They are delicious.

  • im so jealous of her chips and coke in this scene.

  • this scene is creepier than the remake 4 the simple fact that we dont hear what shes whispering so were forced 2 think about it

  • in the remake you cant hear what shes whispering either...

  • lol i forgot i watched this movie. that comment seemed so long ago. anyway i think what i was saying was that in this one it was more in the vain of innuendo unlike the remake we saw lolita do all the sexual stuff.

  • oh, i see what you mean.. and i do agree, but on the other hand an over sexualised child could be creepy than the audience being forced to think about what shes saying, rather than just watching it... but its all about tastes really i suppose.. and i guess the newer one could get away with much more overtly sexual stuff, plus modern audiences are more obsessed with sex and easily distracted if its not as in your face... omg i went around the houses a bit there, but i hope you get what i mean :D

  • "Sue Lyon is marvelous. She is Lolita." -Vladimir Nabokov

  • Except that she's blonde, but yes, she really fits for this role. She is adorable and yet a bit vulgar. I love her laugh, and I think the man that plays H.H. is better than Jeremy Irons, 'cause in the book they put him like really attractive and cynical.

  • But I think the Humbert in this movie is better, because he's kind of creepy and if you've read the book, you don't want to symphatize with him. That's what happens in Jeremy Irons' case.

  • I think the version from 1997 follows the book much better, and Dominique Swain is more convincing as Lolita, although none of them are 12 years old, but I guess they couldn't have such a young girl to play the part. That ruins a bit, because now you just have an elderly man who simply falls in love with a young girl - not like a childish, pubescent one.

  • I've read the book, and I think the 1997 film is far more accurate than this one.

    She's too mature, too old, and he's conveyed as just being creepy. Irons really makes you believe the role of Humbert...

    this is just kind of flat.

  • She seems a bit too mature for this role. Besides, the book describes Lolita as having reddish brown hair and tan skin. She is blonde and dresses like she's 30.

  • @papadontpreach123 I agree, I don't find this movie hard to watch or controversial at all because Lolita seems to be a woman.

  • They decided not to show the part where he says " I was not even her first lover" Also I thick Dominque swain is a better Lolita.

  • also, what is 'malt' ?

  • malt is a germinated grain or some they term it as an alcoholic drink fermented. like ale...

  • can anyone hear what she whispers?

  • Someone know what game that might have been? :D

  • In book in this moment Lolita had sex with Humbert - that's all. She just called it "game".

  • hawt

  • No, if you're referring to the 1997 film, they clearly slept together, being that she says "I hurt inside" in the car after they leave the hotel.

  • oh i gotta watch the movie again thanks for letting me know that

  • blowjob.

  • No one knows for certain, but most people think it's a blow job. It could just be sex, though XD

  • Although Lolita's playfulness suggests a lot of well... fun and out of the ordinary game...

  • MissJ: In the book Hum self-justifies by explaining that she straddled him - imagine the rest. LOL-ita.

  • Yeah... sadly it's plainly obvious that he is lying xD That's what irritated me about the book. Humbert was writing IT to show that he hadn't done any thing wrong, so of course he would say things like that. Heehee, love the 'LOL-ita' xD

  • yeah- what is with that?

  • where's the rest of the movie???

  • will be uploading soon

  • thank you :D

  • @Gilmorish

    Hi there, where did part 11 go? because the next one is after this, the only one I can find is 12

    Thanks :)

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more