Ultimate Wellness with Dr. James Carlson. Part 2 of 8.

[wjestick]

This is the first time I have heard such a clear explanation as to why calories are irrelevant. Even when we digest food, we do not reduce it to its combustion products. But that is what is done to measure the calorific value of food.

Just because a food has 100 calories, it does not mean that 100 calories will be used in the body or even retained in the body.

WoW.

One more time "Calories are relevant to human nutrition" WRONG!

[RickHignett]

Sorry, but if this 'Doctor' went toward the Raw Food side of things - he'd find he wouldn't need his glasses any more. What proof will he need that Raw Food is the way to go.... ?

[StopTheRobbery2]

@RickHignett

The idea that raw foods are better is your BELIEF.

Check out both sides of the story, get the book catching fire: how cooking made us human and then decide instead of being ignorant.