It's incredibly bizarre today to think that everyone watching this, if they traced their parentage back through hundreds of millions of years we would all be the direct descendants of a creature very much like that who took a chance, perhaps a very desperate chance, to see what things were like beyond the upper firmament of the only world it had ever known. It approached the shallower shores of the waters, perhaps paused for a second, then said, "Now or never", and jumped.
The "perfect link" is not so perfect after all. Four months after this video was posted fossil footprints found in Poland with digets predates Tiktaalik by tens of millions of years making video's such as this nothing more than story telling.
@fellowservant34 Footprints have been found that suggest tetrapods took to the land 18 million years earlier than the fossil record found so far. You do understand do you not, that the fossils found so far of tiktaalik arent the earliest form of that species. I bet you're a creationist because you are defining the findings in the wrong contexts, that it all must be wrong. Why though?
Plus, how can this video be wrong about the time this happened when it didnt give one. Watch again!!
@01101100d Tiktaalik can’t be the transitional fossil it has been claimed to be. This very video says "it was the first vertebrate to walk on land" and we now know that this is not true by tens of millions of years! Despite your claim of "earlier species," at the present time, they have absolutely zero body fossils to illustrate the evolutionary transition from fish to tetrapods that now must predate the Eifelian stage of the Devonian system. This video has nice graphics, but it's total fiction.
@fellowservant34 ol, can't you hear yourself. So your telling me that land walking tetrapods hadnt evolved yet during the time the footprints were made. That's what was dated to be earlier than the LATEST tiktaalik found so far. Ooh i wonder what made those footprints then, spooky. Okay, your knowledge and understanding is very poor here. Have you never heard of Icthyostega, acanthyostega. You might want help from gensis.com on that too mate.
@fellowservant34 (comment 2) what do you mean when you put in brackets "earlier species." Is this the famous work of creationist quote mining wonder? I didnt say earlier species. I'm not talking of a different species to tiktaalik before it. I was stating that more fossils can and should exist of tiktaalik. I know very well we dont have that yet. However, it's a safe bet that one will be found eventually, it's a pretty safe bet since creationists didnt think we'd find any transitional forms.
@01101100d Oh,you mean a tiktaalik fossil that predates the Eifelian stage of the Devonian system by tens of millions of years..but the only thing that would prove is stasis..Don't you get it? Tiktaalik is a evolutionary dead-end The only possibility would be for the rocks to be assigned to a different stage on the stratigraphic chart which would be a huge job I doubt they would be willing to do. But evolutionist's have been known to make the evidence fit the theory so I'd put nothing past them
@fellowservant34 "Tiktaalik is a evolutionary dead end." What, how so. It's you creationists who make things up clearly based on your lack of understanding ofthis subject, go back and read my comments again. How can the creature be a dead end when Icthyostega and acanthyostega come after it. You still havent answered what made those footprints if it wasnt te earlier forms of tetrapods tha the fossils dated so far. I'm not interested in god of the gaps so make a valid point will you.
Ever seen a pidgeon, streets sparrow, or perhaps an eagle at the Zoo, if nothing else? How about a chicken, a goose, a duck, or lizard of sorts perhaps? Welcome to the world of dinosaurs.The only diffrence now is that they're smaller, and most have wings (which most didn't in the past!), and feathers too.
@TurokSwe Possible, but not proven, so I'm not sticking my hand into a jar when I don't know the contents of it.Though it wasn't once that they found sharks, and other creatures (sea creatures in perticular), that humans believed to be extinct for millions of years. :l
@TurokSwe There's proof for a very little amount of species, sadly :l
But remains of bones (new remains of animals thought to be extinct) are found just about daily.It's just that certain things can't always be published, but those that are, people wave their hand at, saying it's fake. :l
@TurokSwe And to your next post... What the hell? Dinosaurs don't exist anymore at all, we've never seen a single one. If even just one of every species of ancient creature was still around we'd have THOUSANDS of prehistoric forms around us.
@TheropodKid Well, in fact, countless people around the world have seen thousands of different dinosaurs. Do some research, dinosaurs are not extinct, without a single doubt.
@TurokSwe Yes, non-avian dinosaurs are extinct. I HAVE researched them. Kasai Rex, Mokele Mbembe (SP?), ect. No, not countless people have seen them. Kasai Rex has been proven a Hoax, and Mokele Mbembe is just as plausible as the Loch Ness Monster and Bigfoot. Avian Dinosaurs, however, do survive today.
@TheropodKid No, non-avian dinosaurs are not extinct. I HAVE ALSO researched more of them. Kasai Rex has not been proven to be a hoax, thats only what you believe. Mokele Mbembe, Nessie and Bigfoot are indeed real, nothing to talk about really, theres to much that point to their existence. And these are not the only living dinosaurs, there are countless more, you will realize it after doing as much research as I have, in fact, every single kind of dinosaur and relatives has been reported alive.
@TurokSwe ...Actually, you're right. You have some really good points there. I just looked up a little more about bigfoot and nessie. They're obviously not faked. Same with, for instance, hemeklodons. And I bet even DRAGONS exist. Do you think it's possible that alligators could be dragon babies?
@TurokSwe Yeah. It would be pretty cool if they were, eh? Oh by the way, I want to learn more about evidence for dragon existance and what kind of ecological role they might fit. Can you tell me about them?
Tiktaalik could be considered the pioneer transition towards amphibian evolution. Others would have followed and still others continue today. Mudskippers are very close to what you describe.
Evolution is not something that just 'did' happen, but is ongoing.
The truism 'Change is the only constant' certainly applies here.
@bencubed Evolution is an unproovable theory, thats obvious. Mythology is more close to truth than science will probably ever be. Actual fact is very important, you seems to have been taught lies.
@bencubed Mythology, is actually truth, despite its old meaning, but every person desides for themselves what they want to believe in, wether it´s reliable "mythology" or unreliable science. Oh, so I am sixteen? And you are ten years old, right? Uneducated, laughable! I know what shit they are learning people.
@bencubed What? Did you know that in reality, you are not told everything, and we all live in only one actual reality, but we have different views of it.
@bencubed What a coincidence! I can tell when someone is trying to escape from some personal reality too! What is it for you? Some kind of abuse? Probably because you mentioned it. I feel sorry for you, I do!
Does anyone think like I do: I don't think a god created life, but I don't see evolution as plausible. I find it hard to believe we came from monkeys when there isn't any solid fossil evidence. There is evidence of MICROevolution which are adaptations which is obvious, but there is zero solid evidence (that I've found) for MACROevolution, which is single cells to proteins and eventually a fish to amphibians to mammals. Am I the only one who thinks there is a better explanation than evolution?
@thatgreggguy There is evidence of macro evolution, and if you really care about the truth you'll do some research and find it. Asking people on the comments section of youtube isn't the way. The thing about science is it doesn't matter what we think but what can be proved.
@jappud I would listen to you, but getting information from people in a comments section isn't the way to get helpful advice. I care about the truth so apparently I'll do some research to find it, which totally isn't what I would do by asking (mostly) well informed people if they have the same opinion I do.
@CarlosSpicyWeiner7 You are wrong on multiple levels, religion uses it's scripture as the only evidence for physical(natural) or metaphysical events that occur(without the followers book of truth's they would have no foundation of be"lie"fs) Science uses the natural, and physical realm to gather evidence for it's claims, then tests it's evidence. You seem like a bible thumper, to which I hope you enjoy the fruits of your personal hell when and if you get there.
u know that can be 50% bs, first they say T rex was moving speed of light and pwn all, later he was slow like a slime and a scavenger...so U COULD at LEAST TAKE OUT THE JUMP OF THOSE PRE FISHES ><
@MrDerby2u 1 all fish amphibians insects there all animals but i will assume you mean mammals 2 amphibians and fish reproduce very simialirly by putting eggs in the water to see how they reproduced we should look at modern walking fish who are amphibious just google mudskipper
The animation in this was inexcusably poor, (seriously, missile fish?), and the logic was sloppy at best. Those fish were adapted to move along a substrate because they inhabited ecosystems with shallow water. They didn't suddenly start migrating onto land, and they almost certainly didn't live in cohesive family units. F-
wow! and even though it has a root fossil and can be traced genetically, it's so sad that this animal never existed. too bad that the selfish fish wanted to go against Born-Again ideas and kill itself before it ever truly existed, after it didn't really. i bet this beauty isn't anti-God. probably just anti-crackpot. and that's why it's a fable. cuz THOSE people run religion nowadays. maybe when the good humans are religious again, Tiktaalik will exist again.
@hotwhire That's not true. We have females to do certain things. Look, my point is that you cannot say something is true that isn't proven to be correct. I do not say that God doesn't exist, but I do not say that he's the thing that created everything. You always have to question the theory of others. If you do that you'll be more tolerant to different ideas. For example...the endless war betweer religion. If we just accept that God and Allah are the same being..one huge problerm solved.
@hotwhire But that source told wrong ;). First it was that God created 2 humans and then you got animals and stuff, but humans weren't there until like a huge time after the first animals Your source is wrong about that, so we can conclude that it's wrong about that. So how do you know it's not wrong about some other things too? How do you know it's not c ompletly wrong? You can't. The book is written by men, so how do you know they weren't psycholocially disturbed and wanted to write something?
i kno wat you mean sometimes i need a explanation why god did all this stuff and why did he do it you kno wat i mean i to beileve in both science and god
@poochyboy666 good for you! while i and most atheists would prefer it if you and other theists gave up religion its overall best if you at the very least reconcile your beliefs with reality while this make take a non literalistic interpretation of the bible you at the very least wil be far less ignorant than young earth creationists so in conclusion good for you!
@TurokSwe You believe there's no proof for evolution yet still think it happens, and think extinction doesn't exist? LOL! We've seen both happen. Caribbean Monk Seals have gone extinct, passenger pigeons, ect. And we've been able to see evolution happen too. There is a bacteria that eats nylon and only nylon, which had to evolve because nylon never existed before we created it. And there's a new species of mosquito better adapted to the conditions of North America than their african descendants.
@TheropodKid Ok, its true that there are no known evidence of evolution, but I believe organisms can evolve and adapt, is it so hard to believe? And for those supposed "extinct animals" you just mentioned, it seems very unlikely that they have gone extinct, there are even no proof for it. Ive heard everything you told before.
@TurokSwe I never once said there is no proof of evolution, or that I don't believe in it. The only thing I was correcting you about is that there is in fact proof of evolution.
Thank you for keeping me informed on these thing - I enjoy you video's very much - I don't agree with alot of the comment's That people leave - Some of them are so stupid - LOL
It's incredibly bizarre today to think that everyone watching this, if they traced their parentage back through hundreds of millions of years we would all be the direct descendants of a creature very much like that who took a chance, perhaps a very desperate chance, to see what things were like beyond the upper firmament of the only world it had ever known. It approached the shallower shores of the waters, perhaps paused for a second, then said, "Now or never", and jumped.
trilobright 1 month ago
It could be they weren't first as this video tells us, maybe they shared the first place with the arthropods. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Cyfrlingk 1 month ago
whoa wait. I thought tiktaalik had not yet developed limbs that could support it's weight outside of water.
TechnicallyTechnical 2 months ago
why th f is this gone i neeed this!!!...
ecoman32 2 months ago
It reminds me of crocodiles
FashionDiva181 3 months ago in playlist Animal Armageddon
Bad animations and short bad episode, bad series. It could have been better. And I absolutely believe Tictalic may still be alive.
TurokSwe 6 months ago
The "perfect link" is not so perfect after all. Four months after this video was posted fossil footprints found in Poland with digets predates Tiktaalik by tens of millions of years making video's such as this nothing more than story telling.
fellowservant34 6 months ago
@fellowservant34 Footprints have been found that suggest tetrapods took to the land 18 million years earlier than the fossil record found so far. You do understand do you not, that the fossils found so far of tiktaalik arent the earliest form of that species. I bet you're a creationist because you are defining the findings in the wrong contexts, that it all must be wrong. Why though?
Plus, how can this video be wrong about the time this happened when it didnt give one. Watch again!!
01101100d 5 months ago
@01101100d Tiktaalik can’t be the transitional fossil it has been claimed to be. This very video says "it was the first vertebrate to walk on land" and we now know that this is not true by tens of millions of years! Despite your claim of "earlier species," at the present time, they have absolutely zero body fossils to illustrate the evolutionary transition from fish to tetrapods that now must predate the Eifelian stage of the Devonian system. This video has nice graphics, but it's total fiction.
fellowservant34 5 months ago
@fellowservant34 ol, can't you hear yourself. So your telling me that land walking tetrapods hadnt evolved yet during the time the footprints were made. That's what was dated to be earlier than the LATEST tiktaalik found so far. Ooh i wonder what made those footprints then, spooky. Okay, your knowledge and understanding is very poor here. Have you never heard of Icthyostega, acanthyostega. You might want help from gensis.com on that too mate.
01101100d 5 months ago
@fellowservant34 (comment 2) what do you mean when you put in brackets "earlier species." Is this the famous work of creationist quote mining wonder? I didnt say earlier species. I'm not talking of a different species to tiktaalik before it. I was stating that more fossils can and should exist of tiktaalik. I know very well we dont have that yet. However, it's a safe bet that one will be found eventually, it's a pretty safe bet since creationists didnt think we'd find any transitional forms.
01101100d 5 months ago
@01101100d Oh,you mean a tiktaalik fossil that predates the Eifelian stage of the Devonian system by tens of millions of years..but the only thing that would prove is stasis..Don't you get it? Tiktaalik is a evolutionary dead-end The only possibility would be for the rocks to be assigned to a different stage on the stratigraphic chart which would be a huge job I doubt they would be willing to do. But evolutionist's have been known to make the evidence fit the theory so I'd put nothing past them
fellowservant34 5 months ago
@fellowservant34 "Tiktaalik is a evolutionary dead end." What, how so. It's you creationists who make things up clearly based on your lack of understanding ofthis subject, go back and read my comments again. How can the creature be a dead end when Icthyostega and acanthyostega come after it. You still havent answered what made those footprints if it wasnt te earlier forms of tetrapods tha the fossils dated so far. I'm not interested in god of the gaps so make a valid point will you.
01101100d 5 months ago
Lol @ people claiming dinosaurs don't exist..
Ever seen a pidgeon, streets sparrow, or perhaps an eagle at the Zoo, if nothing else? How about a chicken, a goose, a duck, or lizard of sorts perhaps? Welcome to the world of dinosaurs.The only diffrence now is that they're smaller, and most have wings (which most didn't in the past!), and feathers too.
Wolfgirl2321 7 months ago
@Wolfgirl2321 The big ones still live too.
TurokSwe 7 months ago
@TurokSwe Possible, but not proven, so I'm not sticking my hand into a jar when I don't know the contents of it.Though it wasn't once that they found sharks, and other creatures (sea creatures in perticular), that humans believed to be extinct for millions of years. :l
Wolfgirl2321 7 months ago
@Wolfgirl2321 In fact, there are proof that would be enough to say they are still alive or lived very recently along with Humans.
TurokSwe 7 months ago
@TurokSwe There's proof for a very little amount of species, sadly :l
But remains of bones (new remains of animals thought to be extinct) are found just about daily.It's just that certain things can't always be published, but those that are, people wave their hand at, saying it's fake. :l
Wolfgirl2321 7 months ago
@Wolfgirl2321 Totally true.
TurokSwe 7 months ago
the bible just say what u need to know (my opinion)
JAYRYNGEL 8 months ago
@MagicAssProductions Yes, absolutely!
TurokSwe 8 months ago 5
@TurokSwe And to your next post... What the hell? Dinosaurs don't exist anymore at all, we've never seen a single one. If even just one of every species of ancient creature was still around we'd have THOUSANDS of prehistoric forms around us.
TheropodKid 7 months ago
@TheropodKid Well, in fact, countless people around the world have seen thousands of different dinosaurs. Do some research, dinosaurs are not extinct, without a single doubt.
TurokSwe 7 months ago
@TurokSwe Yes, non-avian dinosaurs are extinct. I HAVE researched them. Kasai Rex, Mokele Mbembe (SP?), ect. No, not countless people have seen them. Kasai Rex has been proven a Hoax, and Mokele Mbembe is just as plausible as the Loch Ness Monster and Bigfoot. Avian Dinosaurs, however, do survive today.
TheropodKid 7 months ago
@TheropodKid No, non-avian dinosaurs are not extinct. I HAVE ALSO researched more of them. Kasai Rex has not been proven to be a hoax, thats only what you believe. Mokele Mbembe, Nessie and Bigfoot are indeed real, nothing to talk about really, theres to much that point to their existence. And these are not the only living dinosaurs, there are countless more, you will realize it after doing as much research as I have, in fact, every single kind of dinosaur and relatives has been reported alive.
TurokSwe 7 months ago
@TurokSwe ...Actually, you're right. You have some really good points there. I just looked up a little more about bigfoot and nessie. They're obviously not faked. Same with, for instance, hemeklodons. And I bet even DRAGONS exist. Do you think it's possible that alligators could be dragon babies?
TheropodKid 7 months ago
@TheropodKid Sure you did. Dragon babies? Possible, yes. Likely, no.
TurokSwe 7 months ago
@TurokSwe Yeah. It would be pretty cool if they were, eh? Oh by the way, I want to learn more about evidence for dragon existance and what kind of ecological role they might fit. Can you tell me about them?
TheropodKid 7 months ago
which episode is this??
TheAwsomeChloeFan 9 months ago
is tiktaalik still alive because the sort of look like giant salamanders?
groudimon123 10 months ago
@groudimon123 What?
TurokSwe 8 months ago
The bible doesn't mention anything about youtube so therefore youtube doesn't exist.
lukebccb 10 months ago
@lukebccb Please!
TurokSwe 8 months ago 3
I believe these animals are definetely not extinct!
TurokSwe 11 months ago
@TurokSwe ..
Tiktaalik could be considered the pioneer transition towards amphibian evolution. Others would have followed and still others continue today. Mudskippers are very close to what you describe.
Evolution is not something that just 'did' happen, but is ongoing.
The truism 'Change is the only constant' certainly applies here.
bencubed 11 months ago
@bencubed I dont really believe in evolution.
TurokSwe 11 months ago
@TurokSwe ..
Evolution is not a philosophy to believe in, but a science to understand that explains diversity of life.
Mythology might seem like more fun, but only if actual truth is less important to you.
bencubed 11 months ago
@bencubed Evolution is an unproovable theory, thats obvious. Mythology is more close to truth than science will probably ever be. Actual fact is very important, you seems to have been taught lies.
TurokSwe 11 months ago
@TurokSwe ..
Mythology is by definition, not truth. You are sixteen years old and uneducated.
Why the fascination with mythology? It's okay, just keep your world real and consider your sources.
Most people enjoy fiction of one sort or another.
bencubed 11 months ago
@bencubed Mythology, is actually truth, despite its old meaning, but every person desides for themselves what they want to believe in, wether it´s reliable "mythology" or unreliable science. Oh, so I am sixteen? And you are ten years old, right? Uneducated, laughable! I know what shit they are learning people.
TurokSwe 11 months ago
Comment removed
TurokSwe 11 months ago
@TurokSwe ..
What reality are you running from ?
bencubed 11 months ago
@bencubed What? Did you know that in reality, you are not told everything, and we all live in only one actual reality, but we have different views of it.
TurokSwe 11 months ago
Comment removed
bencubed 11 months ago
@bencubed What a coincidence! I can tell when someone is trying to escape from some personal reality too! What is it for you? Some kind of abuse? Probably because you mentioned it. I feel sorry for you, I do!
TurokSwe 11 months ago
Comment removed
bencubed 11 months ago
@bencubed Yeah.
TurokSwe 11 months ago
Does anyone think like I do: I don't think a god created life, but I don't see evolution as plausible. I find it hard to believe we came from monkeys when there isn't any solid fossil evidence. There is evidence of MICROevolution which are adaptations which is obvious, but there is zero solid evidence (that I've found) for MACROevolution, which is single cells to proteins and eventually a fish to amphibians to mammals. Am I the only one who thinks there is a better explanation than evolution?
thatgreggguy 11 months ago
@thatgreggguy There is evidence of macro evolution, and if you really care about the truth you'll do some research and find it. Asking people on the comments section of youtube isn't the way. The thing about science is it doesn't matter what we think but what can be proved.
jappud 11 months ago
@jappud I would listen to you, but getting information from people in a comments section isn't the way to get helpful advice. I care about the truth so apparently I'll do some research to find it, which totally isn't what I would do by asking (mostly) well informed people if they have the same opinion I do.
thatgreggguy 11 months ago
@thatgreggguy Um, okay buddy, sure.
jappud 11 months ago
@thatgreggguy I think there is! And I also believe that it could be possible that we originates from extraterrestrials.
TurokSwe 11 months ago
@TurokSwe The problem with the extraterrestrials is that I think they would have done something to let us know that they created us or put us here.
thatgreggguy 11 months ago
Evolutionists and Creationists do not take different evidence, they take the same evidence and interpret it differently
CarlosSpicyWeiner7 1 year ago
@CarlosSpicyWeiner7 You are wrong on multiple levels, religion uses it's scripture as the only evidence for physical(natural) or metaphysical events that occur(without the followers book of truth's they would have no foundation of be"lie"fs) Science uses the natural, and physical realm to gather evidence for it's claims, then tests it's evidence. You seem like a bible thumper, to which I hope you enjoy the fruits of your personal hell when and if you get there.
Atheist18505 11 months ago
im not even sure if that thing would be able to survive. it has 4 shitty limbs lol. what a tard.
erickshun01 1 year ago
wow tiktaliik was huge!
Cicadafilms 1 year ago
u know that can be 50% bs, first they say T rex was moving speed of light and pwn all, later he was slow like a slime and a scavenger...so U COULD at LEAST TAKE OUT THE JUMP OF THOSE PRE FISHES ><
qpae123 1 year ago
who filmed this? im sure they didnt just jump to land -.-
Zuippi 1 year ago
@Zuippi Nobody Filemd this, This is Aniamtino, sicne these animasl are extinct
eagc7 1 year ago
so, did they reproduce like fish? or like amphibians? or like animals? its not making sense.
MrDerby2u 1 year ago
@MrDerby2u 1 all fish amphibians insects there all animals but i will assume you mean mammals 2 amphibians and fish reproduce very simialirly by putting eggs in the water to see how they reproduced we should look at modern walking fish who are amphibious just google mudskipper
lonewolfM16 1 year ago
The animation in this was inexcusably poor, (seriously, missile fish?), and the logic was sloppy at best. Those fish were adapted to move along a substrate because they inhabited ecosystems with shallow water. They didn't suddenly start migrating onto land, and they almost certainly didn't live in cohesive family units. F-
GalacticChimp 1 year ago
@GalacticChimp yeah, that was kinda weak...
MrDerby2u 1 year ago
wow! and even though it has a root fossil and can be traced genetically, it's so sad that this animal never existed. too bad that the selfish fish wanted to go against Born-Again ideas and kill itself before it ever truly existed, after it didn't really. i bet this beauty isn't anti-God. probably just anti-crackpot. and that's why it's a fable. cuz THOSE people run religion nowadays. maybe when the good humans are religious again, Tiktaalik will exist again.
docdrew87 1 year ago
God created these fossil to test our faith! Either that or he was bored as hell and decided to fuck with us.
Supercucu123 1 year ago
@Supercucu123 OR God created these animals, where the natural disasters were God's Tests and Trails.
hotwhire 1 year ago
@hotwhire How can you tell that God ain't homosexual.
Keall230 1 year ago
@Keall230 then he won't have made females if that was true.
hotwhire 1 year ago
@hotwhire That's not true. We have females to do certain things. Look, my point is that you cannot say something is true that isn't proven to be correct. I do not say that God doesn't exist, but I do not say that he's the thing that created everything. You always have to question the theory of others. If you do that you'll be more tolerant to different ideas. For example...the endless war betweer religion. If we just accept that God and Allah are the same being..one huge problerm solved.
Keall230 1 year ago
@Keall230 i can't just accept it when the theories don't hold weight. there is nothing to use to help prove creation but 1 source retold and retold.
hotwhire 1 year ago
@hotwhire But that source told wrong ;). First it was that God created 2 humans and then you got animals and stuff, but humans weren't there until like a huge time after the first animals Your source is wrong about that, so we can conclude that it's wrong about that. So how do you know it's not wrong about some other things too? How do you know it's not c ompletly wrong? You can't. The book is written by men, so how do you know they weren't psycholocially disturbed and wanted to write something?
Keall230 1 year ago
@Keall230 for the record, I'm Anti-creation but Pro-God if that makes sense.
hotwhire 1 year ago
@hotwhire Ah ok. Let's end this discussion now, was nice talking to you.
Keall230 1 year ago
@Keall230 Fine. I'm not interested in internet arguing nor do I plan to.
hotwhire 1 year ago
Tiktaalik was real but the way it's portrayed seems ridiculous:
The assumption it lives in family groups
The speed it swims
It's movement onto land by rocketing out of the water !
It's movement on land using a lizard-like gait bespite it's heavy body and puny hindlimbs. Surely it would have walked more like a mudskipper?
axorozzas 1 year ago 2
hey that fish thing can swim in air too :D
another super revolutionary thing in evolution ^_^
Peusterokos1 2 years ago
Global warming? So, we aren't responsible for global warming? It was these guys!
Inutenma 2 years ago
i agree.
they are not the first vertebrate,they are earliest amphibians and the first tetrapoda.
subculturalgirl89 2 years ago 5
another frail evolution theory ....
faezbach 2 years ago
Another? I'm pretty sure there's only one Theory of Evolution.
Unless of course you have some great hidden knowledge which you're hiding from the scientific community?
Havokreator 2 years ago 2
This video is labeled wrong... they are not the first vertebrates... they are early amphibians...
CyberVyrus 2 years ago 4
I am catholic too. That doesn't mean you can't beleive in evolution.
astrophysics1997 2 years ago 2
i kno wat you mean sometimes i need a explanation why god did all this stuff and why did he do it you kno wat i mean i to beileve in both science and god
pwrstryka 2 years ago
Is it just me, or is it that the older an animal is, the bigger it gets O-o
PrematureEgo 2 years ago 2
I love paleontology!!!
silverstarz1000 2 years ago 2
Everybody just remember that all of this is just entertainment.
djfdogg 2 years ago
well since it's the Animal Planet it shouldn't be "just entertainment"
xXturbo86Xx 2 years ago 2
First Vertebrate not.
The earliest Amphibians!
Samjapa 2 years ago 2
kinda looks like an alligator if u look at it closely
BLADesCOre 2 years ago 3
AWESOME
forest under the water!
SusSell 2 years ago 3
Im catholic. But I can't beat the facts that evolution does exist.
poochyboy666 2 years ago 55
You think?
If you look more closer you'll see that it isn't like that.
BlackCatLeah 2 years ago
@poochyboy666
good to find another middle of the road guy like me!
SonicSanctuary 1 year ago
@poochyboy666 good for you! while i and most atheists would prefer it if you and other theists gave up religion its overall best if you at the very least reconcile your beliefs with reality while this make take a non literalistic interpretation of the bible you at the very least wil be far less ignorant than young earth creationists so in conclusion good for you!
lonewolfM16 1 year ago
@poochyboy666 There are no evidence of evolution, but I think there maybe is little evolution in the world, and I dont believe in extinction.
TurokSwe 11 months ago
@TurokSwe You believe there's no proof for evolution yet still think it happens, and think extinction doesn't exist? LOL! We've seen both happen. Caribbean Monk Seals have gone extinct, passenger pigeons, ect. And we've been able to see evolution happen too. There is a bacteria that eats nylon and only nylon, which had to evolve because nylon never existed before we created it. And there's a new species of mosquito better adapted to the conditions of North America than their african descendants.
TheropodKid 7 months ago
@TheropodKid Ok, its true that there are no known evidence of evolution, but I believe organisms can evolve and adapt, is it so hard to believe? And for those supposed "extinct animals" you just mentioned, it seems very unlikely that they have gone extinct, there are even no proof for it. Ive heard everything you told before.
TurokSwe 7 months ago
@TurokSwe I never once said there is no proof of evolution, or that I don't believe in it. The only thing I was correcting you about is that there is in fact proof of evolution.
TheropodKid 7 months ago
@TheropodKid Well, maybe.
TurokSwe 7 months ago
@poochyboy666 lol, this shit was just disproved XD
itsmeadin 4 months ago
I don't believe they come out of the water and -SPLAT!- on land.
fire1ce 2 years ago
everyone thinks god created the world should see dinosaurs,a lot MORE then 5000 years ago
xerke 2 years ago 2
They believe god created fossils to fool them, hehe.
Inverness01 2 years ago 32
@Inverness01 I don't be believe that, not at all.
hotwhire 1 year ago
@Inverness01 hehehehehehehehehehe
iztrix 7 months ago
@Inverness01 lol this shit was just disproved xD
itsmeadin 4 months ago
apocalypse? the guy said the wrong thing it's armageddon. there are survivors in armageddon. everything dies in an apocalypse
choirsucks 2 years ago
choirsucks
apocolypse is the immenent destroying of the world
so he means their habitat is getting destroyed
GnoixGenp 2 years ago
he meant apocalypse in a different context..
-points to gnoixgenp's comment-
VenomousWhispers 2 years ago
Thank you for keeping me informed on these thing - I enjoy you video's very much - I don't agree with alot of the comment's That people leave - Some of them are so stupid - LOL
playmate659 2 years ago 5
omg snakeheads!!!
papstbenni 2 years ago
wow
paperin1212 2 years ago
I had one of those as a kid
Dissonant1975 2 years ago
LoL haha.. 50000 years ago XD?
PSGpaintball4LYFE 2 years ago
Comment removed
unkown77777777777777 2 years ago
woot.
interesting. :|
Amprenta2222 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ujsdjhasdjhasd
Fpsdown 2 years ago
wow omg first!!!
XxHaze24xX 2 years ago
wow haha you where first on discovery channel video. gratz on the acomplishment (heavily sarcasm)
mlkeysfullofshit 2 years ago 4