Added: 2 years ago
From: m5boarddotcom
Views: 67,018
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (157)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Must have been a 3.6l Tuscan rather than the 4.0l

  • The driver of that TVR must have been a retard...no way on this earth would a piece of shit BMW beat a TVR.

  • man that tuscan is sweet

  • A Tuscan will definitely out accelerate an M3, absolutely. The M3 is a better car though, hate to admit it. 

  • for BMW owners video...thats enough

  • @linn1000 this M3 was not stock.. or this Tuscan was terrible running power to weight ratio M3 Coupe (e92) 256hp/to Tuscan Mk I 325hp/to Tuscan S Mk I 335hp/to Tuscan Mk II 314hp/to Tuscan S Mk II 351hp/to 1/4mile trap speed M3 114mph Tuscan MKI 115mph Tuscan S MKI 119mph Tuscan MKII 121mph under normal conditions the Tuscan should be the quicker acclerating car..
  • @nagmashot 256 Hp m3? the first e30 m3 was 240hp,this one is,with the 4.0V8 is 420hp...i'm not surprised that it beat the tvr with smg3 paddle gear box:)

  • No way the M3 is stock.

    Either that, or the driver of the tuscan is terrible.

    Ill race any M3 in my Lingenfelter Z06. Would put this NON STOCK M3 to shame.

  • 0:29

  • 0:29 !!!!

  • where is this track

  • i will take the TVR anyway...

  • We are expected to believe an M3 out paced a TVR Tuscan, Do me a favour!

  • BMW FOR EVER!!

    from Poland

  • There's no way that BMW is standard power. Absolutely no way that it is faster than a tuscan to 150!

  • @bowenslim9415 sounds like the bmw is turbocharged...

  • dam the car the camera man is in is faster!

  • these m5 board videos suck balls, the tvr would destroy that m3

  • @Dinocfs depends, if it's a normal Tuscan it has only 350 hp (0-100 4.2 top speed 290km) if it's the S model yes 0-100 3.9 top speed 314km this one seems to be the normal 350 hp version, so yeah could be very close with the m3

  • @Dinocfs why?

  • bollox, i got a tuscan s and she'll hit 60 in the dry in 3.8 secs a full second faster than your beemer which, incidentally is limited to 155mph whilst my tvr will cap out at over 180? bit bias i reckon

  • theres actually one tuscan-i in Slovenia, close to my home (city Velenje :DD)

  • As previously stated, the M3 ultimately has more power, and more aerodynamic, thus have significantly more acceleration than the lighter Tuscan at higher speeds. That's pretty much all there is to it.

  • @RatboyLimited actually aerodynamics have very little play at lower speeds and more in high speed acceleration and top speed..power to weight will aid acceleration..and horsepower and aerodynamics top speed

  • gallardo is so sexy

  • More crap from the BMW team..lets stop the lies people. in the other videos the TVR beats the Lambo, Ferrari, and others for aleast 80% of the race. Here a PISSY little M3 is beating this car LOAD OF RUBBISH. Of course the BMW will win because the team at BMW wont post videos on here of there beloved car losing. I will race any BMW in my TVR and crush them all maybe the new M6 might keep up but the rest are dust.

  • Have to say I thought the TVR would be a lot quicker than that !

  • @s1914 it is this is bollox

  • they work fine.

  • not that bad really, i was expecting the tvr to lag ay behind

  • rich bastards!

  • WOW watching this here race at 29 seconds see a flash like a lambos rear or some thing of the like... maybe i just seeing things. good race though!...

  • very interesting comparison

  • I hope that was sarcastic

  • @LPHGardinerRFC

    well it do has a weird noise but i think it comes from the gearbox..

    anyways, a straight line race is no race at all! i'd like to see how they go on a circuit

  • The line-up was baller status!

  • Not sure if an S would win, but it would most certainly be closer.

  • lol @ subliminal yellow lambo

  • tuscan the abuser of cars its range

  • m3 vs enzo? hahaha!

  • bmw all the way baby:) and bmw 500kg heavier :) bmw 4life!

  • I don't know what TomHoldsworth667 is going on about do you have a BMW!? if so i'll let you warm it up with my RX 7 then i'll show you what my 17 grand Tuscan can do to your car.From the vid the guy was not even trying if he was it would not be on youtube!

  • @looksamc

    I dont know whats not to understand.

    Hey im with you, i have a TVR i love TVR's and would take a TVR over almost anything, certainly BMW's, they dont do anything for me at all. The thought of spending £60k on an M3 to me is rediculous.

  • TVR is awesome because its fast more beatiful and it sounds far better

  • Also for the price of a E92 BMW M3 you could but £10-15,000 worth of Tuscan. Take it to Melling sportscars and have either 518bhp or 550bhp (dyno result verified) at a cost of £7,500 or £8,500 and it would be a car that weighs 1100kg and has 550bhp and would be 599 or carrera GT beating in these drag races from 50-250kph. At a cost of anly between £18,500 to £23,500!! Pluss it solves most of the reliability problems of the engine because of the changes and comes with a 2 year p+l warranty

  • I dont know what all the arguing is about

    A very predictable result really, BMW has a proper 414hp the TVR claims to have 380 but in reality has more like 320-330bhp, the BMW got a jump on it and the TVR clawed back the distance and stayed with the BMW untill the end of 4th wich owning a TVR i know is about 135mph+ which you never go past in the real world. Then the huge outright power advantage of the BMW meant it pulled away in 5th. I personally would have the TVR every time 135- is accademic.

  • well said.

  • LOL 6inline vs V8 =D

    TVR are the best cars =D

    They are great on curves, accelerating, top speed...etc...

    Always go for TVR!!!

    Amazing Straight 6 engines with amazing sound =D

  • suprised that tvr didnt fall apart by the end of the runway

  • tvr anytime

  • That TVR is 500kg ligher than the BMW and has 327hp/t compared to 250hp/t.

    It should eat that BMW at low speeds.

  • salonicaaa, the m3's manual gearbox is regarded as rather good, and the dct gearbox , although a gr8 automated manual, doesnt increase flat out performance especially from a rolling start very much, annoyes me all these uninformed comments from people tht probably dnt even drive...

  • +1,  my favorite thing is to hear people make comments about something they have never driven. It brightens my day.

  • lets make this a fair fight then. In this video it was a standard TVR Tuscan Vs M3(special) now lets swap it around for a standard M3 vs a Tuscan S

    for results..... watch?v=Y8sS07NJWqI

  • it was A STOCK M3 SO SHUT THE FUCK UP and read the description

  • kiss my ass u gay lord! its not a stock!

  • @ 0:29 we get a subliminal message. "Buy a Gallardo"....

  • @PijnigeR haha

  • m3 manual is shit.But the m3 with dct gearbox fuck all cars in his category.

  • dude it's still the same car and plus i owned a guy in a m3 dct with my m3 6spd abd plus i dont think it's worth 3k and plus i bet you didnt even drive one

  • dct has much faster gearshift from manual and all gears from 1 to 7 are much much shorter because it has 7 gears so it run much much faster than manual......so....

  • The E92 is not a mod of the M3..Is just an M3.

  • Yeah M3 V8 and all that but u r racing against the standard Tuscan. A good test would be against the Tuscan S...which is a modified version (much like the E92 is a mod of the M3) and I think that car would kick BM's butt all over the place.

  • E92? Mod of the M3?

    It's an age indicator - just like E30, E36, E46 then E92...

  • M3 E92 is 4.0 V8 stock, not moded, starting at model year 2008.

  • E92 is the model number of the car, the 335i and 328 are also e92's/

  • is there 328 E92 ?

  • model number/code of the chassis more precisely

  • are you stupid e92 is the body number just like mine for e93 (conver tible) E92-coupe E93-convertible e90-sedan

  • That's right - what I said.

    E30, E36, E46, E90/2/3. If you had common sense you would notice that it is an age indicator as well as the newly introduced body numbers, as above.

    Learn to read.

  • M3 V8 fellas...

  • I love the Tuscan but I thought it would dissappear on the Bimmer...guess not

  • yeah it's ugly but the motherfucker is fast...

  • Even though the Tuscan lost, that is a hell of a car. If you want to be unique not much else can touch it...maybe a Spyker C8 (that's what I would get)

  • They don't?

  • yeah they are lagging hardly

  • Try it fro ma faster computer and let them load first.

  • @PindzMedia well it works perfectly for me..

  • now it works .) now there is a choice to play it in 3 formats .. this option wasnt there 10 months ago

  • @PindzMedia

    or are they hardly lagging?

  • Nej Gustav, jag är en utav alla som haft enorma problem med just HD-filmer på din channel. De laggar extremt mycket, och i många fall spelas ljudet endast upp på vänsterkanalen när man väljer HD. Du ska nog snacka med Youtube Staff om detta, då felet troligen inte ligger hos slutanvändaren då det fungerar i många andra channels.

    MVH Funkis_jackson

  • use google chrome

  • how do you work out that's the wrong context?

    seems fine to me

    and I'm not retarded

    anyway I'd argue you're wrong since Jaguar come 2nd in the JD Power Quality surveys almost every year and usually 1st in the custoemr satisfaction survey

  • Comparing astons to jags? Since they were both owned by ford, i would guess that AM took some of the jaguar quality with them when they left.

    With that in mind, why would you disagree that astons arent ugly or unreliable? Last time I checked they were gorgeous, and aston reliability (as with most british cars) isn't amazing but isn't too bad.

    That is, unless you meant 2nd from the bottom in the quality surveys, in which case you should stop criticizing other grammar and worry about your own.

  • erm I think you misunderstand me,I said Aston Martins and Jaguars both have good reliability and AREN'T ugly.You didn't see which comment I replied to I guess?

  • lol got me

  • ey the Aston Martin DBS and V12 Vanquish isnt ugly nor unreliable

  • M3 is real badass . . .

  • I have both, and I have to say, both have their pro's and con's... By the way... I am very shure the Grandpa in his e55 thought so too whe i kissed him good night in my piece of junk Chimaera 500 ;-)

  • m3 is amazing with that top end power

  • TVR Cerbera is what I would like to see race here. 4.5 liters model with 420 hp and about 1100 kg. You would be amazed by what this car can do. I am saving all the money I can to buy me a Cerbera, either a 4.2 or 4.5 model. They are so darn cheap here in Europe. I have seen a Cerbera 4.0 for 15 000 euros (19 000 $) here in Sweden...

  • dont be sucked in. TVRs are one of the most unreliable and temperamental cars on the market. There's a reason they're so cheap, its because they're rubbish

  • thats true. but I think they got something that many other cars don't have. First of all I think they look brilliant in a individual kind of way. And yes they're temperamental. thats what makes them TVR, its part of their CHARACTER. They got character thats what i'm talking about.

    Plus they're just puristic with no luxuries at all, no electronics just the most important things

  • szakalakaka: the TVR has a 360 hp 6 cyl n.a engine. It is faster in a 1/4 mile run then a new Bmw M3. However, in speeds over 120+ mph the TVR gets beaten by new M3.

  • what speed does the tvr stop excelerating so hard?

    all the vids show it doing really well agaist some heavy hitters and then just slowing down near the top end

    is that a common charactoristic with the tvr engine which is a flat six? or is it a straight six?

  • its an inline 6

  • what the M3? he said E92

    i think you should do your research before you say something stupid over the internet

  • i replyed to someone asking if the tvr had an inline 6 or or a flat 6

  • haha im sooo sorry!! my bad really!

    i thought you meant on the E46

    do you understand?

    srry

  • i understand lol it ok

  • sneeky lil Lambo pic @ 0:29 lol

  • Uh, I was just about to say that was an amblance: but for somee reason it was a yellow Gallardo there? :S

  • Yep, I've seen it in several of your recent videos, at 0:30 exactly...

  • Ouch. Somethign I forgot,. Damn,

  • I wish they made more cars like the TVR, just nice and simple no turbo chargers but a stout straight six and light weight.

  • they do. its called Caterham. ;P

  • don't get me wrong i love the seven (oddly enough Im making one but i dont expect ppl to believe that) but you just dont see cars anymore without the absurd wieght of AC and power steering crap

  • british power, silent killer

  • That TVR is impressive.

  • TVR Tuscan HP?????

  • I think its a speed six.

  • the Tuscan is fast..but BMW M3 is very good,<3

  • M3 V8 fellas... BMW

  • the m3 u were driving is that the one with the green wheels ?

  • No, this was a stock M3 E92.

  • i just love the video after the race. it's like a supercar parade!

  • Yeah go m3!!!

  • I'm surprised with the result in a way. I have driven a Tuscan S and an E92 M3 and I would say the TVR definitely felt a lot faster. I know this is a standard Tuscan but I can't imagine there is huge acceleration difference between this and the S model. M3 is still a hugely impressive car nonetheless.

  • What years did the M3's have v8's? Awesome video! 5/5 as always.

  • The new one is the first with a V8.

  • Correct, I hope they make a Z4 M coupe with that engine.

  • that would be awesome.

  • It would be the first Z car for men!

  • In stead of a car for rich girls with fake boobs!

  • the newest BMW m3s have the V8, i'm not sure but i would say 2008 models onwards

  • 2008 m3 untill the next generation of m3 which will have a inline 6

  • hahahahahaa @ 112namrepus

    i live near scottsdale, arizona, and this rings truer here than probably most of the world.

  • my eyes sees the tuscan is a beautiful machine

  • the tuscan is very good in accelerating however it loses its edge at top speed

  • 5th gear on BMWs was always the killing one

    direct 1:1

  • they're built for top end speed, as they are built-for-track cars. it is great to watch the 5th gear rip though.

  • correct all BMW`s M cars better after 3rd gear!

  • Youre eyes is wrong))) kiddig

  • "Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder" as they say...M POWAA!!!!

  • too bad it lost!

  • VIDEO SPELL ERROR .. STARTS AT 0:50

    you misspelled "owners"

  • Thanks. Too bad its close to impossible to fix it withotu deleting this video :(

  • you guys have the best videos, just felt the need to mention it !! keep up the good work

  • Thank you dodi2007!

  • AMAZING VIDEOS!! i have seen atleast 100 videos from you!!!

  • Thanks you. Be sure to subscrive and pos these videos online.

  • subscribed almost 2 years ago. ;P

  • m powa

  • The M´s as always great top end.

  • RWD is WAY better at the top end. If you see a Ford GT stock 550hp race an LP640 stock 640hp about. The GT will pull ahead from about 140mph to wherever they want to top out at. AWD creates so much drag, but off the line it's great. That's why the RS4 does not leave the M3 in the dust.

  • on a straight line AWD is not too good. and on a quarter mile or shorter AWD is good kuzz you got good grip. really AWD is amazing. i drove a porshce 911 turbo, and i drove another cayman S, and i knew i had more power on the 911, but i had more grip

    and i think AWD will be better on a track like lemans or nurburgring, even tho they are the hardest race trakcs

  • bmw 's top end... amazing

  • that was the best race yet

  • Top end on the V8 & V10 of the M5 &M6 are impeccable! BMW power!

  • nice

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more