Added: 1 year ago
From: RTAmerica
Views: 57,107
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (1,808)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Despite the "dumb fucks", "deluded idiots" & all the infantile tunnel-visioned unsuccessful attempts to intimidate & distract people which are quite plentiful here, I STILL would like to know what generated the ENERGY & FORCE to propel those steel girders, some weighing tons, 100's of feet away, & embed them into the facades of other buildings,

    Scores of surviving firefighters said they heard bombs going off in the buildings. Are they ALL dumb deluded fucks too or was it just mass hysteria?

  • These bulidings had to come down,it was a occult site.This was a inside job,everybody knows this!!!!!!!!!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE; You can't deny the facts or the truth.

  • Yes, Dr. Paul also said it was planned.

    Let support honest people and not money maker of the world.

    No more manipulation.

    Wake up world!

  • 9/11 liars are like scared children. Wake up little one!

  • 9/11 truthers are gullible idiots.

  • @JVDnh3 go back to sleep sheep

  • Did you loose anything that day? Well? Plenty of people lost and not the one's who had investments planned to benefit from murder and extortion and treason- You might learn what 'truther' stands for- It is support to those who can take action- Were it your spouse, child,or sibbling,and you figured out that they were dead for greed and not forgien terrorists as you were fooled with altered videos+ false reports- You may not feel so in denial- When U C Nibiru beside the Sun- Deny it 2- nasa 1983

  • Hasn't the word gotten to you yet that they used holograms in place of real planes on 9/11

    Is everyone dragging their feet until the Earth covers the treason actions of the administration and all the bad guys are in their nests underground and the truthers are wasted above ground in the changing and volatile Earth's surface????

  • @westhampton Did you know that many cameras are set to record the [above ground] action for the underground viewers? I guess the pope will give a hand gesture when millions of Christians are consumed by natural causes and the Catholic Church and the pope can save their money this time- Supporting Hitler during the war had its advantages to thinning the Christian population as did selecting great Christian Cities in Japan to bomb- When is the real Darth Vader going to stand up-

  • @westhmpsn Don't fall for this tactic, stick to the facts!

  • for america to shut up they just gotta look at building 7 that's all never got hit just had a couple of fires on a couple of levels... and it came down... people better wake up... once shtf its game over... GAME OVER! WAKE UP... or move aside real patriots will protect this country not sell outs...

  • @WAKEUP2XXX

    it was hit by a collapsing 110 story building, had major fires and the FDNY proclaimed the building in danger of collapse, stopped rescue operations and coordinated a collapse zone

    so how is this game over? FDNY part of the crime?

  • Some people will say that "Israel did 911"...but come on, this is only PARTLY true.

    There is NO WAY that Israel did it alone without the help of the US, Britain and Saudi Arabia components. Look at the PNAC document wheere they call for "cadalysing event like a new pearl harbor". No way Mossad did it alone - NO WAY.

    911 was a ZIONIST inside Job

  • WATCH : The Millitary KNOWS Israel did 911 , on YouTube .

  • Truthers are the most retarded morons on the planet. I would love to punch Dylan Avery's smug ugly face into the middle of next week.

  • 9/11 Truthers are all liars and retards

  • @terrymanning1 Wow you're a fool. Just another ignorant sheep that believes whatever the media tells them..

  • @AlienBeliever897 Fuck off truther retard scum

  • @terrymanning1 Kid, grow up.

  • @terrymanning1 I think you're the retard here. I used to be like you, and I used to think truthers were idiots, but then I decided to actually educate myself and look at the facts.

    Ever heard of WTC 7?

  • @AlienBeliever897 Derrrrrrrrr. Ever hear of demolition preparation?

  • @AlienBeliever897 /watch?v=k8VAsoVuShM

  • @ZDanielRogers The link didn't work..

  • @AlienBeliever897 omg... copy it in front of youtube.com

  • @AlienBeliever897 You are in a cult, save yourself.

  • @900DucatiSS Haha you're the one that's in a cult buddy. Wake up and stop drinking the koolaide.

  • @AlienBeliever897 I so agree with you.  People do not want to look at facts... Straight Objective Facts! It angers me anymore. I try to tell about the truth and facts and even say "Don't believe me! Research it yourself!" NO ONE DOES! Instead they recite the"official story" and character assassinate me. I have asked this question many times, Do you 100% trust your government? Most people would say no not in the slightest, but yet so many people just accept the GOVERNMENT's offical story.

  • @MrPeltman73 You're right.

  • Comment removed

  • @AlienBeliever897

    Your a sheep

  • @TheWhiteboy3431 Nope. I'm a goat

  • @terrymanning1

    Your right

  • @terrymanning1 ignorance is bliss huh?

  • moon landing was a hoax,9/11 was an inside job, soilent green is people and Atlantis was just discovered....lol.

  • The Biggest "ENEMY" these (Hidden from Public Scrutiny) Zionist/Jewish Parasites have is "TRUTH!" They'll do absolutely ANYTHING in Their POWER To prevent it getting to the WORLD Masses and because They Own/Control ALL of The WORLDS Media; how can the TRUTH ever be EXPOSED? Well firstly; These Evil Parasites/Freemasons/Secrete Societies and European Aristocracy(British Royalty) are on the RUN! WHY? Because too many are "Waking-UP" to their outrages and Psychopathic "New World (ENSLAVING)Order!"

  • '9/11 may have been an inside job'.

    Really? Wow. I'd never thought of that possibility before. I though Bush just kept me safe.

  • The clown below is a joke who will just whine and yap and say, someone else says this and that so Im too stupid to say it in my own words. He ignores fundamentals of physical reality and is just a plain boring time wasting JoKe. I cant read english and will constantly demand that someone translate force equals mass into a formula so i can sound like i actually know what the fuck im talking about. EL o EL. What a Laugh.

  • @Denierbud11, @12weasel100

    Funny how I am getting called "an idiot truther" when I am simply asking a question to try to find out the truth. Please refer me to a link that shows:

    (a) Bin Laden admitting involvement in 9/11, and

    (b) Any evidence of the Pentagon aeroplane debris.

    You are making the assertions. I'm simply asking.

  • @patrickcorliss

    feel free to use google

    the pentagon is well documents - try the FBI FOIA reading room, available on line

    also feel free to google the Moussaoui trial exhibits -- plenty of photos there as well

    BTW - did I call you an idiot? I thought that was directed at another, may be wrong, you all sound alike -- almost like a cult or something

  • Buildings don't collapse from the top downwards. This was a controlled explosion and a few heartless people made millions out of the disaster. Veritas!

  • @dxbguy82

    controlled explosions do not start from the top down

    you are an idiot

  • What happened to flight93, plane that disappeared into the ground and only left a small hole? And didn't leave any trace of it being a plant crash site? No bodies, no plane parts, no luggage? Every. Other crash in history always leaves some trace, bodies, parts, luggage? Even when it's at sea. But this flight vanished into thin air. Isn't that strange?

  • @KDips18

    the crash did in fact leave parts, pieces of luggage, plane parts and other items

    why do you lie?

  • @Denierbud11

    Can you show me debris anywhere in relation to the Pentagon crash?

  • @patrickcorliss

    google

    United States v. Zacarias Moussaoui trial exhibits

    but somehow, i think you will dismiss it all out of hand, won't you?

  • @Denierbud11

    I merely asked you a question and you are already making assumptions about me without any evidence. That's seems to be what you are complaining about.

    I asked about evidence of debris. Are you telling me that bits of the Pentagon plane were submitted as evidence in the prosecution of Moussaoui?

    If so could you please give me the specific link.

  • @patrickcorliss

    photos of the crash site, including photos of the plane debri -- they did not carry a part of the plane into the court room (at least not to my knowledge) . The authenticity of any exhibit could have been questioned by his counsel.

    again, try google, find the site, review the exhibits and the pleadings

  • @Denierbud11 Very good, this is something no one can debate.

    During that trial, the FBI, testified under oath, that NO Calls were Connected longer than "0" Zero, Seconds.

    That is the FBI.

  • @americanbandwidth

    that is not true, there were calls connected but they could not identify the number called

    why do you lie?

  • @Denierbud11 That is not the Testimony of the Agents during the Trial.

    "No Calls Were Connected that Lasted more that Zero Seconds" That is the Quote.

    No one could have made a call above 8,000 feet. No one could have made a call moving at 450 mph, much less 600 mph.

    This is Science and Fact. It is also Court Documented under Oath.

    You have Your opinion, you are entitled to that.

    You can't have Your own Facts.

  • @americanbandwidth

    you are wrong and you are a liar

    if you think you are correct, send me the link to the court transcript

    bet you can't

  • @Denierbud11 Just read the Trial Transcript.

    The real issue that proves 9/11 was an inside Job is the Molten Steel.

    Where did it come from?

    Nothing in the buildings or planes burns hot enough.

  • @americanbandwidth

    where do you think it dame from and what caused it? how does molten steel make it an inside job?

  • @Denierbud11 Ok, Explain to all of us how Kerosene, wood, computers, people and dry wall got hot enough to Melt Steel.

    Kerosene is Jet Fuel. Open air burn 599 F.

    Wood and everything else is max. 900 F. open air fire.

    NIST Claims 1800 F.

    Ok Fine. Steel Melts, Becomes Molten, like Lava at 2700+ F.

    You're still missing 900 F.

    So, Explain how this Impossibility is Possible.

  • @americanbandwidth

    you are the one claiming its proof of an inside job, so explain why it is proof -- what causes "molten steel" for several weeks?

    is sure as hell is not thermite, so what could it be?

  • @Denierbud11 What part of "Nothing inside the buildings or planes burns hot enough to melt steel", Do you not understand?

    So, now the issue has moved on.

  • @americanbandwidth

    that in your mind, there must have been something that caused the temperature and that something is PROOF of an inside job

    so what is it?

  • @Denierbud11 Where did all the Molten Steel come from?

    That's the only issue.

    As i have stated 4 times now, Nothing in the buildings or the planes was hot enough to melt Steel.

    Where did the Molten, melted steel Come from

    USGS, Univ of Copenhagen, FEMA and R.J. Lee Group All Report Molten Steel.

    Where did it come from?

    This is the Lynch Pin issue, this is Proof 9/11 could never have happened the way Gov. States.

    This is the issue No one can explain, It's Impossible.

  • @americanbandwidth

    no, the issue is why do you think this is a smoking gun -- what caused it if it was not uncontrolled fires underground? and how do you know it was molten steel and not some other metal? there was a lot of aluminum in that pile

  • @Denierbud11 USGS, Univ. of Copenhagen, FEMA and R,J, Lee Group all Report Molten Steel.

    FEMA Detail it in Appendix C.

    Nothing in the buildings or the planes burns hot enough to Melt Steel.

    Where did the Molten, Melted Steel come form?

    It is Impossible for this to have happened the way Gov. Claims.

  • @americanbandwidth

    I do not believe FEMA used the term melted steel, or molten steel

    and you still can't explain why it is significant -- saying it is does not make it so

  • @Denierbud11 Read the Report, Appendix C.

    Oxidation and Heat.

    They detail the "Swiss Cheese" Effect of a Melted Girder.

    I don't have to say this, All I have to do is be able to Add.

    Math does all the rest.

    Look up Open Air Burn, Kerosene, Wood, Plastic, Drywall and You'll see that it is well below the melting point of Steel.

    The point is that It is not possible to have happened the way Gov. States.

    Physics doesn't change and neither does Chemistry.

  • @americanbandwidth

    appendix c does NOT say there was melted steel -- it even places the heat at a temperature that could be reached by an office fire

    so you evidence does not support your summary of the report

  • @Denierbud11 FEMA: "iron in the form of spherical particles" Appendix C 3-7.

    RJ Lee Group

    "metallic microspheres were once molten, surface tension pulled the droplets into a spherical shape. Then the molten droplets solidified in air, preserving the information that they were once molten in the spherical shape as well as chemical information." And RJ Lee report continues

    "Exposure of phases to high heat results in the formation of spherical particles due to surface tension."

  • @americanbandwidth

    so on what page does FEMA say they found molten steel?

  • @Denierbud11 I just posted the exact quote, page, subsection and line.

    As well as the R.J. Lee Group defined understanding of the issue.

    5th report "Journal of 9/11 Studies"

    "the presence of metallic microspheres implies that these metals were once molten, so that surface tension pulled the droplets into a roughly spherical shape. Then the molten droplets solidified in air, preserving the information that they were once molten in the spherical shape as well as chemical information."

  • @americanbandwidth

    "iron in the form of spherical particles"

    this does not say molten steel -- iron is not steel

    and when did RJ Lee publish in journal of 911 studies?

  • @Denierbud11 R.J. Lee Group was hired by the Deutsche Bank.

    In a Law Suit between the Bank and The Insurance Company.

    Read what I just typed.

    How does Molybdenum Melt?

  • @KDips18 not to mention the missile, i mean "plane", that hit the pentagon..

  • we jews did 911 HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

  • 9/11 = inside job

  • only in a twoofer world can those massive monds of debri at ground zero be considered emply holes -- how stupid

  • @Denierbud11 The holes were made by the PLANES dear & the empty spaces were left in the air where 2 110-storey buildings stood only a few seconds before. Don't pretend I said there was no debris & that you don't know what cut-off point means. You FIRST responded to me from the question I asked about it. Now you are clueless. Read the question slowly again. It doesn't appear English is your 1st language so if the question was too complicated & it makes you conflate different things I understand.

  • @bajanzelly

    I have no idea what you mean by cut off point - cut off point to what? I'm not going to guess as to what some paranoid idiot claims or thinks he/she knows

    so when did you stop beating your wife and how many voices do you hear in your head?

  • since the buildings did not pulverize in mid air - questions concerning how did they pulverize are a logical fallacy

  • What you see on all message boards is a microcosm of society. Everybody fighting with each other whether it is Intellectual debate, or people just spewing profanity. Doesn't matter point is we aren't on the same page. Nobody should have to put up with tyranny or oppression. There should be a common denominator between all humans no matter what race or religion. And that is a peaceful existence.The people attacking others are the ones who should be scrutinized.

  • The problem is infighting that is facilitated and perpetuated by our "leaders" and main stream media. Both by example give the public a sense that it is okay to slander, personally attack and belittle anybody who disagrees with the government. All questionable events in our history would have been exposed in this way if the internet and alternative media were as prevalent. Don't let other people dictate the way you think. ESPECIALLY the establishment.

  • the American media dont cover 9/11 or ask questions because 99% of the networks are owned or controlled by Jews or pro-Zionist Neo-Cons like Rupert Murdoch..

    so why would the Jews who have total control over the media expose their Zionist friends,,the friends who wired up those towers with explosives..

    the Jewish race is a tight knit group,they dont even have to be told whats expected its almost instinctual.. so dont ever expect American MSM to clue you in..thank god for RT

  • Typical Russian Times left-wing (well, FAR left-wing) conspiracy theory bullshit. No reputable news organisation, engineering firm, or scientific organisation in the world believes the "theories" of the "truthers". Try CNN, BBC, Reuters, or the Encyclopedia Britannica, for instance.

    The "truthers" are just the sort of people who believe that the CIA had something to do with the time they were overcharged $1.45 for their groceries. Paranoid and irrational.

  • @richard20bris richard gage would shit on you with his knowledge of this shit, so fuck up ya wanker

  • @jayot33 what an intelligent reply. Keep trying, guys...no one believes you, nor affords any weight to the useless sources you put forward. Your conspiracy theories are garbage and are treated as such by the vast majority of news agencies, researchers, academics, politicians, and ordinary citizens.

  • i watched loose change or something. what bull shit!!!! people with a simple technical knowledge can immediately understand what kind of crap this so called journalist are trying to sell. i am a former aviation mechanic so you can sell the story to any idiot in US but not to the person who knows what jet airliner can or can't to do. the story deserves to be scary fairy tail for children..

  • @dmtmir1971 i agree loose change is the biggest load of shit i have ever seen, have u seen the guys who made it what abunch of cunts!!!!

  • Better to be a 9/11 TRUTHER than a 9/11 LIAR.

    3 QUESTIONS 9/11 LIARS CAN'T ANSWER:

    Why didn't the Empire State building & its contents pulverise into dust in MID-AIR when that bomber hit it?

    Why does Osama's family business STILL get contracts from the US GOV'T to build US military bases in Africa & Asia including Iraq when he 'perpetrated' the WORST terrorist act on hallowed American soil?

    Why did the FBI NEVER want OBL for 9/11 despite ALL the propaganda spewing from the Presidents & media?

    

  • @bajanzelly cos it was a slower plain probably with less fuel on it maybe there could be many reasons!!

  • @biss14able Do you mind telling what those many reasons may be? What is the CUT-OFF point where the plane's speed & the fuel load determine whether or not a building & it's contents including humans will remain intact or will totally pulverise into dust in mid-air in mere seconds while steel girders some weighing tons are propelled100's of feet away causing them to EMBED into the facades of other buildings? How exactly would that process work? Could you also please answer the 2 other questions?

  • @bajanzelly

    the towers did not pulverize into dust in mid air

    let me guess, you believe in Judy Woods space beams

  • @Denierbud11 What's all that dust that covered EVERYTHING & EVERYONE & travelled miles? One second they were standing there upright but for 2 big holes & the next they miraculously converted into 2 huge clouds of dust leaving just empty space. What caused those clouds & where did they suddenly come from at the same exact time of disintegration? Are you saying the dust didn't exist at all or that the towers pulverised but not mid-air? Pataki himself said the towers pulverised.

    'Space beams'?????

  • @bajanzelly

    the buildings collapsed, when buildings collapse there is a ton of dust

    if you watch closely, you can even see the towers collapse in videos -- as they collapse, dust is created -- just as dust is created evertime a building collapses

  • @bajanzelly

    the bomber that hit the empire state building was 1/10th the size, traveling at 1/3 the speeed and hit a building that had concrete along the exterior wall

  • @Denierbud11 I will ask you the same question I asked biss14able. What is the cut-off point & how did that process take effect?

  • @bajanzelly

    "What is the cut-off point & how did that process take effect?"

    cut off point to what?

  • @Denierbud11 but the twin towers were 11 times stronger

  • @ikmagic123

    how do you know the towers were 11 times stronger -- show your math

    bet you can't

  • @bajanzelly I believe the third questions in inaccurate because according to Loose Change, they did put out a warrant for arrest. The question is: why didn't they indict him or present formal charges against him as a reason for a warrant for arrest?

  • @sayidfas713 What was the reason for the warrant then? According to the FBI web page of most wanted that I again checked as of 17 Jan 2012 at 0410 GMT both he & Al-Zawahiri were/are wanted for murder & conspiracy to murder US nationals OUTSIDE the US which were the embassy bombings in Africa, for an attack on a Federal facility (location unstated) & he was a suspect in other attacks throughout the world (9/11 not mentioned at all). Al-Zawahiri & not he was indicted for the bombings.

  • @bajanzelly

    He was already wanted on capital charges, no need for a new warrant -- additionally, the FBI was not charged with his capture -- the DOD was after him

  • @bajanzelly your questions are bullshit and have been answered

    1- no building including WTC was pulverised to dust. (pulverised dust is an illogical statement to make) and Emipre was hit by a smaller plane at a slower speed and had a concrete core. And fires were smaller and put out quickly

    2- I am not sure of all contracts provided to the Bin Laden family (and I highly doubt you do too) however the Bin Laden's denounced Osama and they cut ties with each other (continued)

  • @bajanzelly (continued) logic would dictate that the Bin Ladens are still doing business with the US because they run legitimate companies and have the same right to do so as any other business. Your logic in asking this question is fucked. It would be like asking if you commit a crime why would your parents still be allowed to have a job. Osama's actions are not those of his families. Besides your question is based on assumption and opinion not fact (continued)

  • @12weasel100 If someone killed 3000 people I would not accept as logical that my gov't would enrich his business & it's subsidiaries with $million contracts from my taxes & we're supposed to be hunting his ass down. IF someone murdered YOU, would you expect your family to help enrich their family just because they said they 'denounced' him? Would that mean all is forgiven for killing your ass? Multi-million $ contracts are not mere 'jobs'. How do you know I'm 'assuming'? Are we reading minds?

  • @bajanzelly as I have already stated the Bin Laden family broke all ties with Osama. What you think as logical is only bullshit opinion that is not logical at all. Logic fails you. As I asked (and using your own question) IF someone killed you would you expect the entire killers family to be fired from their jobs. Based on your logic Ted Bundy's entire family should not be allowed to work in the US because Bundy was a killer. Or Laden family should not work because of Osama. Logic fails you

  • @12weasel100 If Osama committed the WORST act of terrorism on American soil as the American Gov't says, his family could keep on working as it pleases but that same gov't should not be constantly enriching them. The contracts since 9/11 could certainly have been awarded to lets see..AMERICAN companies. You keep talking about firing from jobs (your logic) but I'm talking about multi-million $ corporate deals. If someone killed me my family would be INSANE to offer contracts to my killer's family.

  • @12weasel100 go away shill go blow your FBI buddies, you're gonna burn in hell, have fun fucktard!!

  • @Wrothchild yeah thanks for the typical little delude truther crying response. when you have no facts to support your shit you just cry. You are following your truther manual well young truther. All you need to do now is spew out some shit that you cannot support with fact call people sheep, troll and shillthen run away and you will earn your tin foil hat.

    boo hoo truther mommy will down to the basement soon to give you a big hug and make you feel better.

  • @bajanzelly (contineud) and the FBI did want Bin Laden he was on the top 10 most wanted list. However it was Shiek Kelick Mohammad that was the mastermind behind 911. All people associated with Al Qaeda were wanted.

    your questions are pointless bullshit that are assumption and opinion based. None of it any facts to prove your bullshit.

    You are a dumb fuck

  • @12weasel100

    You said "the FBI did want Bin Laden". Yes, but not for 9/11.

  • @patrickcorliss because in 2001 Bin Laden denied any involvement in 911 and though it was suspected no hard evidence surfaced at that time. It was not until 2004 when Bin Laden finally admitted to being involved and tapes to support it appeared. By then the DoD was after him. Also Khalid Sheikh Mohamid was the main mastermind behind the attacks. (continued)

  • @patrickcorliss (continued)however going back to the original questions they are pointless and irrelevant. It is all based on opinion and speculation. None of it is any type of proven fact to clearly prove controlled demo. Sorry you idiot truthers fail again.

  • @12weasel100 Osama was on the top 10 but he was NOT wanted for 9/11. Go check the FBI website. If KSM was the mastermind of 9/11 are you saying Osama was not? As for KSM some good old water-boarding made him admit to EVERYTHING under the sun including a plan to attack Plaza bank in Seattle that was established in 2006 AFTER his capture in 2003. Swallowing & inhaling some stinking water will make a mare fly Mr. Johnny Weasel.

    As for your myopic attempt at insult my dear, water off a duck's back.

  • @bajanzelly (continued) and Osama was not wanted in 2001 because the FBI had no hard evidence against him (he funded it Sheik Mohammed was the mastermind). Osama did not admit to it until 2004 (also when vids were found of him organizing it) by then the DoD was after him as an international manhunt. And Sheik Mohammud was captured in Sept 2002. he bragged about 911 in vids in April 2002 BEFORE he was CAPTURED and subsequently "water boarded". You logic fails you again. Mr. Johnny Bajanzelly

  • @12weasel100 As for those Osama tapes-you mean fatty Bin Laden? His family appreciates your support I'm sure. KSM was captured in March 2003-easily verified.

    These red herrings you throw out do not negate the fact that those 3 buildings came down in the manner they did. I would dearly love to know what force turned whole human beings (as of 2005) into nearly 20,000 pieces & fragments, 6,000 of which could fit in a test tube & some of which were propelled on top of Deutsche Bank 400 feet away.

  • @bajanzelly yes I made an error KSM was captured in March 2003 thank you for making your point more illogical. KSM released tapes admitting he masterminded in 2002. He was captured (by your own correction) in 2003 therefore his admission was not one made in torture but of his own free will. And again your reference to Bin Laden family is pointless and illogical not only is it merely your shit opinion it does nothing to prove controlled demo. You are just a rambling fucking idiot.

  • @12weasel100 Mirror mirror, Johnny. Typical-insults are taken not given & I'm not taking any because you don't mean 1 shit to me. Your pathetic puerile attempts only lead down one endless road fucking idiots ALWAYS take.That is school yard mentality. Points can only be discussed with people who actually have functioning brain cells & I realise yours unfortunately are MIA so you can't help yourself. It's your prerogative to believe whatever you wish. Off you go & don't forget to eat your veggies.

  • @bajanzelly "points can only be discussed..." you have no facts to support the bullshit points you are making. We are all right here waiting for you to provide facts and logically explain all the shit you spew out. If you cannot support the shit you state then I am not "name calling" I am pointing out the obvious that you are retarded. So big mouth now that you opened your stinkhole prove us all wrong and provide facts to support your points you want to discuss.

  • @bajanzelly (continued) you asked three shitty questions. I clearly answered them and proved you wrong you choose to ignore my answers and substitute in your deluded fantasy as some type of fact. Making shit up is not discussing points it is creating a fantasy world. If you open your stinkhole mouth and spew out shit points you want to discuss then you should support it with facts. If you do not then it is not name calling to tell you that you are fucked up in a deluded world you dumb fuck

  • 3 QUESTIONS 911 TRUTHERS DON'T WANT YOU TO ASK THEM:

    If explosions were heard in the basement of WTC 1, why did the building fail at the point of impact?

    If the WTC was destroyed in a controlled demolition, how did the nanothermite charges survive the plane impacts and how did the perpetrators know exactly where the planes would hit the building?

    How do you explain Khalid Sheikh Mohammed’s confession to planning 911 in an Al Jazeera interview back in 2002?

  • @ctcole77 dude, why would a plane destroy all the nanothremite. if it did the building would have incinerated.

  • @PitBullsBiteHard question number one easy. so you could ask that dumb question. and i'm not being sarcastic. that is the answer. it was on purpose.

  • @bajanzelly as well as.. who made NORAD stand down..

  • @oldford71 There are so many anomalies & it's unbelievable that people ignore ALL. It's like 'my mind is made up, don't confuse me with facts'. I guess that's why innocent people get convicted despite the exculpatory evidence & vice versa. What they do is try to bog you down with minor issues in order to distract you from the main points which can't be explained or insulted away. I just want someone to explain what produced the energy to turn those tons-heavy girders into projectiles.OBL or KSM?

  • @bajanzelly

    "Why didn't the Empire State building & its contents pulverise into dust in MID-AIR when that bomber hit it?"

    ARE YOU FOR REAL UNEDUCATED GULLIBLE SHILL?

    First off, the Empire State Building was hit by a B-25 weighing 40,000 lbs at 160 mph with a 200 gallon fuel tank.

    The WTC was hit by a 400,000 lbs Boeing 767 at 500 mph with a 10,000 gallon fule tank.

    Even a 911 twoofer can do that math!

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

  • @ctcole77 You fucking idiot! Even if it was hit by 10 boeings, it still wouldnt cause it to fall perfectly with no resistance. It would tilt lean and fall on other buildings and not just desinegrate in its own footprint. Maybe you should take a course on architecture and engeneering before you go spouting off some bs NIST statistics.

  • @ctcole77 The law of consevation of momentum cannot be violated.

    Nothing takes the path of MOST resistance.

    Equal and OPPOSITE reaction.

    Steel does not weaken or melt in jet fuel. That is completely idiotic.

    Dog tags do not melt in jet fuel. There are no family members of passengers.

    Firemen set fire to burn buildings all the time, over and over and over again.

    Now, address the points and keep in mind shill boy. IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ME. Cause all you got is personal attacks.

  • @Psy0psAgent Address the points and dont say one fraking word to me. If you do not address the points and make any insult whatsoever to me. You lose.

  • @Psy0psAgent

    "Steel loses about 50 percent of its strength at 1100°F," notes senior engineer Farid Alfawak-hiri of the American Institute of Steel Construction. "And at 1800° it is probably at less than 10 percent." NIST also believes that a great deal of the spray-on fireproofing insulation was likely knocked off the steel beams that were in the path of the crashing jets, leaving the metal more vulnerable to the heat.

    911 TRUTH DEBUNKED!

  • @ctcole77 One point and you failed at it. I know a guy living 4 blocks away. He moves houses for a living. You took that quote from some bitch who you think is a master. You do not know for yourself. That is heresay evidence. Not science. FACT No jet fuel or office fires can heat a steel beam, let alone 47 of them to cause them to turn to liquid like licorice. Its idiotic. Have you ever seen a steel beam first hand. Ever dumped gallons of jet fuel on a small piece of steel & burn it?

  • @ctcole77 Also, you ignore the laws of physics and use that appeal to authority crap instead of grown up science. I see no formulas. I see nothing that can expain violations of the law of conservation of momentum. Nothing to do with the fact that jet fuel cannot do what the loser you quote claims. Ridiculous. Talking to a flat earth asshat that brings no science to the table. You cannot refute my evidence. No family members of passengers. Nothing takes the path of MOST resistance.

  • @ctcole77 You have trolled these vids for years now. That qualifies for participation in war crimes and treason. I will bet your entire commercial liability on it. It does not change the fact that you or your kind RUN like cockroaches whent he lights on if you ever try to deal with real physics. Just talk, appeals to authority, personal attacks, etc. There is no statute of limitations on treason. You better hope ppl dont learn grade 5 science.

  • @Psy0psAgent

    I'll be waiting for my subpoena.

    I'm still waiting for you to list ALL the laws of physics violated on 911.

    Feel free to include your sample equations and calculations.

    911 TRUTH = 911 LIES

  • @ctcole77 EL o EL. I listed them already. If you cant grasp the formulas that are equated with the words, that's not my problem. You are then incompetant & arrogantly mouthy about it. The law of consevation of momentum cannot be violated. I need not offer proof. Its called a law of physics for a reason. Any claim that the laws were violated requires proof of claim. All you do is yap and play flip flop. Nothing can take the path of MOST resistance. Again. Like a hammer. Self explanatory

  • @Psy0psAgent

    Oh, I must have missed your sample equations and calculations.

    Can you list them again?

  • @ctcole77 oh yea and with the new NDAA nobody needs one of those pesky subpoenas anymore. There are two in the message below. Did you not read it? Is this another example of your feigned or real incompetance? Just another flip flop yap that leads to a circle? Do you know how predictable you are? I know you dont care. Like someone told me, what you dont know will be your undoing. I can feel how creepily diplomatic you are trying to be. It must tear your guts out, trying to be nice.

  • @Psy0psAgent

    Still waiting for your sample equations and calculations proving newton's laws.

    Can you list them again?

  • @ctcole77 ROFLMAO. Let me get this straight. You cannot grasp what nothing takes the path of Most resistance means. You cannot grasp what the law of conservation of momentum means. Therefore you do not know what these things are. Im screenshotting this for the lulz. What the $%&#? HEY everyone. THIS GUY just asked me for calculations PROVING newtons laws. IS THAT RICH OR WHAT? What part of equal and opposite reaction cant you grasp. Dont answer. Your a silly waste of time.

  • Comment removed

  • @ctcole77 Psst. There's 3 in the message below. BeGone FooL.

  • @Psy0psAgent

    Do you even know what an equation is troll?

    w = mg

    w = (20 kg)*(9.81 m/s/s)

    I'll keep it simple because I know 911 twoofers don't like math.

  • @ctcole77 add equal and opposite reaction to your bullshit above, kid. or do the words not make sense to you. weight equals mass times acceleration. so the fuck what? you forgot equal and opposite reaction. you ignore consevation of momentum. you ignore that nothing can take the path of MOST resistance. FOOOOOL. EL o EL. There are no family members of passengers either. You fail. Get lost. Amatuer. LMAO. What a joke.

  • @Psy0psAgent

    WHERE ARE YOUR EQUATIONS AND CALCULATIONS?

  • @ctcole77 weight equals mass times acceleration - you obviosly cannot correlate the words and the formula. Stating the obvious is ridiculous. I do not need to state the equation for weight equals mass times acceleration of gravity lol, just to make you happy, it does not change the fact that you are ridiculous or that the laws of physics cannot be violated. you ignore fundamental laws of the universe, so have PROVEN you are incompetant or just full of shit. Congrats. Have a nice day.

  • @Psy0psAgent

    Well uneducated gullible troll, 200,000 engineers at the American Society of Civil Engineers seem to disagree with your magical theories.

    I guess we should just close all the civil and mechanical engineering schools in America and let 911 twoofers design all of our structures.

    911 WAS AN OUTSIDE JOB!

    So I guess we

  • @ctcole77 Took you an hour and a half to come up with that one. Appealing to authority again. I could care less if the council of mars said this and that dipstick. Thats not how the law works. I stated the laws of the universe. In the statements are the equations shithead. Force equals mass times acceleration is the equation. I gave 3 like that. If you need me to spell out f=ma, you can go fys. If you claim the laws of physics were violated PROOF OF CLAIM IS ON YOU. Thats how the law works! LOL

  • @ctcole77 If these civil and mechanical engineering schools cant do grade 5 science or talk about like grown ups then yea, something is wrong. For sure. Oh and you missed out on equal and opposite reaction AGAIN. So yea, ignore it again and all the other facts and then ask me again ffs where my facts are. Sick game, U are Boring and incompetant. Enjoy my background pic snookums.

  • @ctcole77 did you waste all that time bullshitting to look that up like it meant something? Just so you could pretend to know what you are talking about. Did you consider I was messing with you cause I know you will do everything possible to avoid facts of physical laws? Chatter chatter chatter. DISQUALIFIED.

  • @ctcole77 I bet it hurt so bad not being able to call me all kinds of names.

  • 2:52

    "I don't support violence."?

    If you actually believed that the government attacked and killed 3,000 of it's own citizens in a covert act of "treason," why wouldn't you support violence?

    I see no evidence of meaningful activism here.

    It reminds me of the PEOPLES FRONT OF JUDEA in "The life of Brian." Turthers have endless meetings and can't come up with a plan of action other than silly stuff like, low-budget documentaries, book sales, heckling, bumperstickers, and posting on Youtube.

  • @HellRehab LOL - that the best you got? WEAK! ROFL!

  • @C4P1T4L15M AND 9-11 WAS NO DOUBT AN ATTACK BY BINLADEN BECAUSE GWB & WOLF BLITZER SAID SO!! AND WE NEEDED TO SNUFF OUT THOUSANDS OF US SOLDIERS LIVES IN IRAQ & AFGHANISTAN BECAUSE THE US CONGRESS IS MADE UP OF TOTALLY HONEST MEN & WOMEN WHO MAKE IMPECCABLE DECISIONS FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY & THE WORLD. BECAUSE GOVERNMENTS NEVER LIE OR TAKE BRIBES AND ARE NOT COMPRISED OF WHORES WHO'D SELL THEIR OWN GRANNIES DOWN THE TOILETTE FOR A POTATO. BECAUSE GOVERNMENTS ARE ALWAYS TRANSPARENT, DUH!!

  • @C4P1T4L15M osama is dead but he died in 2001

  • Tell me how they just happened to find both terrorists passports on the sidewalk down the street from wtc. Isn't that weird how everything was blown to bits except they just happened to find those flimsy little paper booklets? How convenient to back up the plot... :\ i dont know why it was planned or who did it but this stuff is weird. there are no weird things like this with katrina, or other disasters. no fake witnesses or government lies etc.