You have an engineer here who wants to go to jail. If that bell isn't on 1/4 of a mile from the crossings and the train were to hit someone, then that engineer would be in big trouble.
@Railroader007 No man, the bell must be on 1/4 of a mile from the crossing. The horn is the one that can be timed to the speed. Faster ... start at the whistle post. Slower ... start where you will still be able to provide your 20 seconds or warning. Here in Canada the bell does not need to be rang if the horn is being blown for a crossing but that doesn't apply in the U.S. 1/4 of a mile from the crossing until occupied no matter what the speed.
@Railroader007 It says that in the CROR (Canadian). This is from the GCOR - 5.8.1 Ringing Engine Bell -
• Approaching public crossings at grade with the engine in front START SIGNAL AT THE CROSSING SIGN. If no sign, or if movement begins between sign and crossing, start signal soon enough before crossing to provide warning. Continue ringing bell until the crossing is occupied.
@GEES44DC I dont deal with NORAC. That's a new one to me. Vary true they sue because they can. I remember the first thing they told me to do if and when we hit a car was to make sure those gates where down. (sad we had to think like that) The one thing I find as odd is that the bell is considered as working even if it only dings once or twice. Doesn't do a bit of good if it claps 3 times and dies....
@Railroader007 The NORAC rule book just says it must be rung when approaching and passing through public crossings at grade. Now, we have that kind of language in our rule book too. When you dig deeper and find out what the interpretation of 'approaching" is ... CN says 1/4 of a mile. That may not be the same for all railroads but in a society where people will sue for anything, starting the bell as late as this engineer is foolish.
Enjoyed the video, as all of my commuter experience is on the 2 coasts (NY, PH, LA, SF). Sounded like a real hen party going on in the head car. Old ladies day out to the Chicago museums?
I'll have to try doing that. When you did it did you pay the conductor before you got on the train or did you let the conductor see your video camera and pay while it was recording?
@UnionPacificGuy Nope, no one said anything. If you do it on a weekday rush hour, it tends to be less of a problem (i.e., the conductors then have better things to do than pointlessly harass riders for videotaping/photographing.). I've had the most trouble with filming this way on the BNSF Line and Electric District, probably because they are some of the busiest lines. All three of the UP lines have been less problematic for filming, personally.
@Nachtwolf1: Since "quiet zones" were instituted. People complain about the noise for some reason...
JM: Odd, I wonder why they moved near a railroad and then complain about the noise. I'm almost positive that most railroads were there before the people moved in. But anyway, I bet the engineer likes not having to sound the bloody horn all the time. Sounds like a good deal all around. Thanks. Great video. I loved it.
You have an engineer here who wants to go to jail. If that bell isn't on 1/4 of a mile from the crossings and the train were to hit someone, then that engineer would be in big trouble.
GEES44DC 3 months ago
Comment removed
Railroader007 2 months ago
Comment removed
Railroader007 2 months ago
@GEES44DC The law only applies to the horn, not the bell
Railroader007 2 months ago
@Railroader007 No man, the bell must be on 1/4 of a mile from the crossing. The horn is the one that can be timed to the speed. Faster ... start at the whistle post. Slower ... start where you will still be able to provide your 20 seconds or warning. Here in Canada the bell does not need to be rang if the horn is being blown for a crossing but that doesn't apply in the U.S. 1/4 of a mile from the crossing until occupied no matter what the speed.
GEES44DC 2 months ago
@GEES44DC I challenge you to find me the law the states that in my years of railroading I have never heard that.
Railroader007 2 months ago
@Railroader007 It says that in the CROR (Canadian). This is from the GCOR - 5.8.1 Ringing Engine Bell -
• Approaching public crossings at grade with the engine in front START SIGNAL AT THE CROSSING SIGN. If no sign, or if movement begins between sign and crossing, start signal soon enough before crossing to provide warning. Continue ringing bell until the crossing is occupied.
GEES44DC 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@GEES44DC I dont deal with NORAC. That's a new one to me. Vary true they sue because they can. I remember the first thing they told me to do if and when we hit a car was to make sure those gates where down. (sad we had to think like that) The one thing I find as odd is that the bell is considered as working even if it only dings once or twice. Doesn't do a bit of good if it claps 3 times and dies....
Railroader007 2 months ago
@Railroader007 The NORAC rule book just says it must be rung when approaching and passing through public crossings at grade. Now, we have that kind of language in our rule book too. When you dig deeper and find out what the interpretation of 'approaching" is ... CN says 1/4 of a mile. That may not be the same for all railroads but in a society where people will sue for anything, starting the bell as late as this engineer is foolish.
GEES44DC 2 months ago
Comment removed
Railroader007 2 months ago
Enjoyed the video, as all of my commuter experience is on the 2 coasts (NY, PH, LA, SF). Sounded like a real hen party going on in the head car. Old ladies day out to the Chicago museums?
brassspitoon 6 months ago
Comment removed
lordbemylight 8 months ago
Why did you skip Park Ridge?
brushcreek42 8 months ago
@brushcreek42 I had to dump my camera's memory card on my laptop right about then. Card was full.
Nachtwolf1 8 months ago
I'll have to try doing that. When you did it did you pay the conductor before you got on the train or did you let the conductor see your video camera and pay while it was recording?
UnionPacificGuy 11 months ago
@UnionPacificGuy I paid before filming.
Nachtwolf1 11 months ago
I wanted to go to the front vestibule window of the cab car and was told that I could look but not film. When you did it did anyone object?
UnionPacificGuy 11 months ago
@UnionPacificGuy Nope, no one said anything. If you do it on a weekday rush hour, it tends to be less of a problem (i.e., the conductors then have better things to do than pointlessly harass riders for videotaping/photographing.). I've had the most trouble with filming this way on the BNSF Line and Electric District, probably because they are some of the busiest lines. All three of the UP lines have been less problematic for filming, personally.
Nachtwolf1 11 months ago
How were you able to do this cab car ride? I'm trying to do a cab car ride on Metra but was told I couldn't.
UnionPacificGuy 11 months ago
@UnionPacificGuy Well, it's not from the cab itself; this was taken from the front vestibule window of the cab car.
Nachtwolf1 11 months ago
My God, look how tall Chicago is.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
No horn at a crossing? Since when?
JetMechMA 1 year ago
@JetMechMA Since "quiet zones" were instituted. People complain about the noise for some reason...
Nachtwolf1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Nachtwolf1: Since "quiet zones" were instituted. People complain about the noise for some reason...
JM: Odd, I wonder why they moved near a railroad and then complain about the noise. I'm almost positive that most railroads were there before the people moved in. But anyway, I bet the engineer likes not having to sound the bloody horn all the time. Sounds like a good deal all around. Thanks. Great video. I loved it.
JetMechMA 1 year ago
Cab car View CTA Green Line Oak Park to Cottage Grove
TheDqwt 1 year ago
hey, that's where I live in this illinois
poopybooyah 1 year ago