@charliepioneer Bitch-slap yourself right now! SS is a Chevy thing, never to be used on a Dodge. SRT is already the Chrysler equivalent of the SS, but for something like you're talking about, namely a competitor to the Camaro ZL1, we'd need something like a Challenger SRT8 ACR. The past ACR models from Chrysler (the Viper and Neon both come to mind) have positively dominated the competition, and reserved only enough courtesy to allow everyone else to fight for second place.
Two awesome cars, they are YES. Saw on TV Discovery how they build a Challenger. 1st class job! I was impressed. Engine built in Mexico = also 1st class factory. Engine --> Canada and put together there. There is no chance to get a Monday ex.if you buy a Challenger. And I'm sure its the same with the Mustang. Go America Go!!! Wrrooom the muscle cars are back on the highway!
@geclay That's the lamest ideea i`ve ever heard. If you wanna go down that road... how about puttin` that Viper against a Ford GT. Hell, i`ll let you tie another dodge to it's rear and it'll still smoke the Viper ;) I don't even wanna bring the GTX-1 in this discussion ;)
Myhusbands getting ready to buy me a numbered limited edition 08 Mustang Bullitt for our wedding ann. I don't care about buttons on the steering wheel! I care about having a car that's hard to find and will have my friends and co-workers drinking glass after glass of hater-aid!!!
@n1u2t3z4 ? wtf u stoopid ass fuckeer..muscle is the best..better than tiny ass import fuckers....a fully hooked up import can beat a stock muscle....but a fully hooked up muscle can kick any cars ass
@n1u2t3z4 ill take the 5.0 GT with the manual trans, 3.55 gears interrior upgrade and the brembo brake kit. 40grand leaving me with 10 for mods. (vortech blower? tune suspension drop and beefed up control arms.) what import are you getting (new)? an STI or evo i suppose? there good cars but they offer no theatre for me. And for a 2.5 they offer very poor epa ratings. The mustang matches the M3 for performance and stock vs stock ill take the mustang over the STI.. (canadian prices)
I am totally Mopar and that is what I drive, but with the 5K difference in price, you can easily put the SRT 8 in its place with some motor work/mods. SRT 8 though can't be beat for looks, the Challenger is just nothing but BADASS hands down, no matter what motor is in it!
I have a 2011 challenger rt automatic, same car. I got the 0-60 timer on evic, and did it in 4.82 seconds, stock. Whoever said 0-60 in 5.7 seconds doesnt know how to drive.
But then at the same time, once in a while the car has some "dead spots" where I hit the accelerator expecting power and it isnt there..... Why?
@TheJellybean1988 poor computer timing. Get an aftermarket tuner. Youl see better throttle response, better shift points, and better fuel economy. Youl also probabally unlock a little horsepower and definitely some torque. BEST MOD YOU CAN MAKE FOR YOUR MONEY. oh and if anything goes wrong. Just reinstall your original tuning and get the warranty work done.
@azir64 these are muscle cars. not made for competing against sport cars. if you want american cars that kick european cars' ass then look up the corvette ZR1 or 2012 viper. the ZR1 being one of the fastest in the world right now
The original 68 Mustang used in the McQueen movie could beat both its new counterparts. I'd bet my life on it. Can't beat the original 60's muscle cars. They weren't weighted down with all the earth-friendly crap of today.
Edmunds you're stupid as shit. You're comparing an srt8 to a bullitt. It's pretty much a gt. The only people who buy challengers anywhere are black people who wanna put 22's on it and some gay paint job. Do a real fuckin comparison.
@razumfrackle How ithe fuck is that racist? It's true. 90% of the people I have seen in a challenger are black and most had some big rims on it. And dumb? That's your opinion dude.
@KillaCamRon405 sure the 425 hp Challenger is gonna look pretty good next to the 315hp Bullitt. But put it next to a Shelby GT500 and i think there might be a different story.
12 seconds ? 13 seconds? Com ON! thats nothing, 10 second car ! weres that one? you aint running 10 , then get your bitch ass car off the line and park it !
@austinbbmopar very true, but the fact of the matter is they tested the 08. you responded with saying it comes in a manual as well. i corrected you and you denied correction. you later found out to find that i was correct in correcting you deeming me the victor in this controversy. GOOD DAY TO YOU SIR!
@iandude454 NO, Taylorgang9505 said that..... i told him "NOT IN 2008 bro" The first thing you said was it ONLY came in MANUAL.... how can you be right if in 2008 THEY ONLY came in an AUTOMATIC
@austinbbmopar ah thats where i have been mistaken. i meant to say automatic. this was a mistake but the truth of what i was proving is in the information i provided. due to the fact that he said only manual then i said it again means it was a typing mistake. forgive me for my mistake i meant to start off with it came in automatic only. i back that fact up with my comment saying third gen paragraph one which says it only came in automatic. just a typo. but i was saying it was only automatic
@austinbbmopar here is the link and the sentence. All (7119) 2008 models were SRT8s and equipped with the 6.1 L (370 cu in) Hemi and a 5-speed AutoStick automatic transmission.
Are you kidding me? You're going to call the Challenger better because it's got more god damn buttons on the steering wheel? It's not about that! It's about being a fucking bad ass! Both cars are bad ass! I don't give a shit how many buttons they have! Although I did wish the Challenger was available with a manual...
@SuperWhoopass I think they picked the Challenger in this test because its faster to 60, quarter mile, slalom, better ride, better interior, better exterior, and oh yeah more buttons to push......Super whoop ass did you even watch the video??? Challenger has been available with a manual since 2009, 6speed with Viper trans, anyway american muscle all day!!!!
Every compare video has the same comments....bottom line with enough money you could make a fiesta go fast. I drive my car everyday and it makes me grin. I hope whatever you are driving it does the same for you. Cheers.
@a5kylar No the fuck it isn't! Zr-1 has stomped the GTR, the R8, GTR-3, into the ground! There's even videos of it don't try and play off that bull shit. If I could get a ZR-1 i'd make it 4wheel drive and give it twin super chargers then laugh at just about anything that I pulled up next to.
LMAO!! ZR-1 Has beat the GTR-3 into dust and RUF are AFTERMARKET tuners.Meaning after you buy your car you can take it to them pay a shit load more cash to go a little faster.
Go look for the videos of the ZR-1 stomping those jap and euro cars down. It was so beautiful. I wish Ford came back with the GT and made it TT push it over 1100bhp easy. gtr is 4wd it might beat it off the line but it wont stay there for long.
@a5kylar ZR1=better grip, better brakes, better acceleration. ZR1=better car. Handling isn't quite on par with the GT-R, so I'll give "Godzilla" that much. It's got that awd advantage, but the ZR1 has smoked it before and will smoke it again.
@acdcgreat But imagine if you took the power advantage away from the ZR1 and the GTR made the same numbers at the wheel, sadly the ZR1 lose, Its a great car on paper and on a little boys bedroom wall, but the ZR1 just isn't usable everyday. the GTR was designed with all weather driving in mind, do you think a ZR1 owner would drive it in the snow? Hell no to afraid of crashing b/c it cant handle anything but dry pavement.
@NaziJewNikka It's called magnetic ride control. Put that car in sport mode. And race around the green hell over in Germany. It'll beat your precious S2000, by over a minute. Stop acting like you know what you're talking about.
mustang is so old and tired. they just keep redoing it with little changes. make it look like an original, then we`ll talk. it`s all about styling and challenger copies the original. mustang looks like a gym shoe.
challenger looks great. goes great. feel's great. pure win. though the weight of the car is insane. in little light cars that horsepower can pull 10's. the price you pay for luxury I guess.
I love it when ricers brag about how their engine puts out x amount of power per liter. Let me know when you have one that puts out over 9,000hp and cover the quarter mile in 4.8 seconds at 300mph.
Or let me know when you build a real truck. Just like with other things, Americans are just plain bigger than Japs. ;-)
well I own a 2007 supercharged Gt Mustang and a 2010 challenger RT, I think this comparrison is a little off, they should have compared the mustang GT500 to the Challenger srt8 because then it would have put the 2 companies top line cars against each other, or they should have compared the RT challenger and the GT mustang bullitt
Just my opinion. It wouldnt have gone horribly wrong for the GT500 !!!
like I said though I love em all, nothing like american muscle!
I dont think one can really know which car is better when there are different drivers for each one of them. The drivers play the most significant role
I still don't get what this idiot up there is talking about when he speaks of the MR2. In a class with the Boxter and Miata it just screeeeeeeeeeeams vagina... seriously.
Dudes ! This is funny shit ! I have listened to these arguments for 40 YEARS ! ! They are always the same ! FUUUUNNY ! I have raced many of different cars and I got to say .... these drivers SUCK ! We will never know what these cars can really do until they put some proffesionals in the seats ! My Grandmother can shift and drive better than these Goobers !
this shit is a old challenger i got a 2010 with a 6 speed and its a fucking monster i got super 44 on it a it runs 11.9 . the drive sucks on here flat out
U SEEE U PUT A 2008 MUSTANG FULLY AND ADODGE 2008 FULLLY EVEN WIT A AUTO DODGE STILL WILL WOHIP FORDS ASS!! AND WAIT TILL EARLY 2012 late 2011 DODGE IS GONNA BE BACK AND WAY MEANER!!
The Mustang HP numbers range from Motor trends 412 hp to other test of almost 420. All dyno's do not tread the same. They can differ 30+hp. just throwing that out for ppl that don't know.
(Gunforme) Your right on the numbers. I am just going from the reviews i saw online. I do not own any of these cars so can only go on what I read. I can say that the Challenger looks way better than the mustang and goes more back to the old school days with its curves and lines. I almost bought a black RT a few weeks back but need a roof on the house b4 I jump into that. Thanks for your comment. Question :what is the difference between the RT and SRT?
@wesleymattison00 Wait til dodge answers back. :P Also, didn't they say the challenger was putting out 420hp and the new 2011 Mustang puts out about 417hp? Seems about the same. Lighter mustang may benefit though.
@tenormayne Again. Power to weight ratio....the challenger has more weight so it needs more engine...where the mustang is lighter and has big power and remember the new boss 302? it has like 460 something hp....which...is about the same as the srt8 but the mustang could win...cause it is lighter and uses less power to go fast
Maybe both cars are shit? I'm sorry Ford, but... Live rear axle? Both cars are blocky and just awful looking, I hate the retro muscle car look. DESIGN SOMETHING NEW! People do it all the time! Plus... 5.5 or so seconds for 0-60 with a 5+ liter v8? A Mazdaspeed 6 with a 2.3l supercharged engine can do that. If a Japanese or German company was working with this kind of displacement, they would destroy these steroid shooting redneck jokes.
@MrJamesonStyles they could use a supercharged engine, but why not put a bigger one in that offers more durability and low to mid range power? Then you ask, why not supercharge the bigger engine then? Well as the engine becomes more powerful, the rest of the car must follow such as heat dissipation, suspension, fuel consumption, gear box. There is a reason trucks have have a high engine displacement and muscle cars are going for that exact same thing. If you want more, do some modifications.
a tank like the Challenger is quicker than the lighter Bullit in 1/4 mile ... hmmm both are nice, Bullit looks a little bland compared to the Dodge. Last I seen, Challenger does come manual now?
@Flappyization A lot longer than some big ass muscle car, that's for sure. There is a reason why most of them sit outside someone's house collecting rust and dust, praying for the day someone comes along and gives a full rebuild.
@BayAreaMuscleZ28 You do have a point there. I am not saying imports are better than domestics though. I know a muscle maxed out classes most imports (as there are few that can compete with the muscles). My Mr2 however is not, as I have yet to see a single one break 9's. I was just saying.
@gogetatr12 MR2 Turbo is STOCK dumbass. If it comes that way from factory without later modifications, it is stock, regardless if it has forced induction.
@gogetatr12 You're exact words were stock. If a car comes with it, it is stock. Now if you want to bitch because a lil four cylinder has a lil forced induction (which the CT20B is still a small turbo) and runs the same times as a big ass engine in a car that has twice the size of the motor, then that's fine. Just recognize it is still stock vs stock on times.
Um, idk what you're smokin but the MR2 comes nowhere close to an SRT Challenger. Gen 3 MR2? Those have got to be the girliest looking of the bunch. I mean, I prefer a man's car with a man's engine, not some girly little 4cyl that sounds as attractive as a swarm of bees. Why are you talking about the MR2 ratings? I doubt you even own one because can't you just drive it yourself and tell us how it is instead of speaking of ratings?
@dobadriver Really? I don't own one? Really? Why don't you have a look at my channel. I have 3 and selling one so I can put a gen 3 in my widebody. I like how you call it a girly car, when you rarely see women driving it. Although I do it give it to you, when they made the first gen MR2, the woman was their target customer. Lots of women have owned the first gen, not so many the 2nd gen (Maybe the N/A), and third gen? wow. Woman car all the day. Anyways, the 2gen motor is done on mine
Hey man, you don't look at a video then tell people that a car that is smaller, slower and more appealing to a female fan base is better. I'm sure you like your car and that's fine, everyone is entitled to their opinion.. but you threw the first punch. Look how many morons liked your post you made. It's people like you that give people false knowledge of vehicle. Now theres a bunch of dumb kids out there thinking that an MR2 is an incredibly fast man's car.
@dobadriver Then I implore you to watch "Supra RZ vs Toyota MR2 (Rev3)" stock vs stock. It's simple, someone races a car 1/4 mile and throws the viewer a time. Check the time on the MR2, then give me a ring back on here. Thanks.
Im not saying they are slow. But what do those cars weigh anyways? I'm guessing less then 2500lbs? Besides, the Jap versions were faster. You said you had a gen 3. They are slower then gen 2 and they are quite girly looking. I'd say if I ever were to buy one it would be a gen 2... but i would never buy one. I like big comfortable cars with v8 power. Not a little go cart with a turbo that will die over the years.
@dobadriver Sir, the MKII MR2 Turbo that was produced in the USA from 91-95 is the CHassis I am referring to. The Gen 3 Motor is The 3sgte as is in the MKII, which in the USA normally comes the tuned down version of the Gen 2 motor. Not Gen 3 MR2 which would be called the MKIII, which only has 140hp using the 1ZZ motor. Does that clear up the confusion? Because in the USA, only gen 1 and gen 2 3sgte here. Japan, gen 1, gen 2, and gen 3 3sgte available. Gen 4 3sgte only in Calinda GT-Four.
@dobadriver Another thing... Our cars don't die over the years. More Japanese cars are still driveable with way more miles on them then your domestics. Don't give me that shit. Toyotas are by far the most diehard cars known to man. American cars are fast, very powerful, and people pay a lot for restored ones. But how many sit dusty in people's garages and driveways? How many 66' mustangs you see with 300k miles and still being driven? Compared to our sporty Japanese cars? Yeah, thanks.
Really? How many 70's and 80's jap cars do I see around here? None really, if I do they are rusted to shit. I had a 1978 Chrysler with a 360. The engine still ran and the only problem i had with the car was when someone t boned me and I had to get rid of it 2 years ago. My bro had a 1966 Chrysler 300 with a 383, and if you knew what you were talking about you'd know they ran on leaded gas( so would a 66 mustang). It's amazing that the car ran great until 2002 with the wrong gas.
@dobadriver Ok, so you take your engine, get inducted hardened valve seats for your "Leaded" gasoline engines... What's so hard about that? They are "Classics" right? To be quite fair, you rarely see older model Japanese cars because not many were being bought in the USA during their early age. You have to remember a lot of Americans had fathers who fought in WWII and would boycott them. Also, I see more Datsun/Nissan 240z out there (car for it's time) than anything else, still running.
@dobadriver Oh and after you have the valve seats hardened induced with the exhaust valve seats, you run 89 octane. That should keep it going.... I took an Engine overhaul Class dealing with mostly domestic engines.
Um, most people never bothered to do that and I'm not 50, I'm 23. By the time I drove these cars it would be too late anyways.. i would have been better off rebuilding the engine. There were lots of Japanese cars sold here in Canada, but here most have rusted to nothing by the time they were 10 yrs old.
It all about the driver nuff said.
KX125dirtdemon 1 month ago
dodge needs to do a supercharged version
challenger srt8 SS
charliepioneer 1 month ago
@charliepioneer Bitch-slap yourself right now! SS is a Chevy thing, never to be used on a Dodge. SRT is already the Chrysler equivalent of the SS, but for something like you're talking about, namely a competitor to the Camaro ZL1, we'd need something like a Challenger SRT8 ACR. The past ACR models from Chrysler (the Viper and Neon both come to mind) have positively dominated the competition, and reserved only enough courtesy to allow everyone else to fight for second place.
JETZcorp 1 week ago
@JETZcorp supercharged sport...
charliepioneer 1 week ago
@JETZcorp and i know the ss is chevy
charliepioneer 1 week ago
Two awesome cars, they are YES. Saw on TV Discovery how they build a Challenger. 1st class job! I was impressed. Engine built in Mexico = also 1st class factory. Engine --> Canada and put together there. There is no chance to get a Monday ex.if you buy a Challenger. And I'm sure its the same with the Mustang. Go America Go!!! Wrrooom the muscle cars are back on the highway!
petereuropa 2 months ago
challenger has v8 oh
liam6g6 4 months ago
lol typical comparisin... 20k price gap... lulz
DaBluedude100 5 months ago
@faqer2007 be serious the ACR will rip the GT and GTX1 a new 1
itchytasty100 5 months ago
Well you have the manuals now. But overall for street presence, the Challenger has any mustang beat hands down.
Kweb88usnSRT8 5 months ago
lol this car weighs 17 tons its not faster than anything
g2dragon 5 months ago
@geclay That's the lamest ideea i`ve ever heard. If you wanna go down that road... how about puttin` that Viper against a Ford GT. Hell, i`ll let you tie another dodge to it's rear and it'll still smoke the Viper ;) I don't even wanna bring the GTX-1 in this discussion ;)
faqer2007 6 months ago
I thought it was car vs bullet*gun*
ET111111111 6 months ago
Myhusbands getting ready to buy me a numbered limited edition 08 Mustang Bullitt for our wedding ann. I don't care about buttons on the steering wheel! I care about having a car that's hard to find and will have my friends and co-workers drinking glass after glass of hater-aid!!!
lovecoachmore 6 months ago
If you like slower, softer muscle cars, get a mustang. If you want a hard hitting beast, go with a challenger.
penaltyto22 6 months ago
@penaltyto22 Tell that to the 2 SRT-8s that my mustang beat. I still love and respect all American Muscle though
SupremesFORCE 6 months ago
muscle cars overall suck.. my balls.. if you love muscle cars.. YOU suck my balls
n1u2t3z4 6 months ago
you suck balls
TheMomomustang 6 months ago
@n1u2t3z4 ? wtf u stoopid ass fuckeer..muscle is the best..better than tiny ass import fuckers....a fully hooked up import can beat a stock muscle....but a fully hooked up muscle can kick any cars ass
C0LDxBlooD3d 6 months ago
@C0LDxBlooD3d when you say muscle you only mean zr1 you dumb american
in reality you have to be stupid to waste your money on something thats only useful for burnouts..
any $50K,2009-2011 muscle is crap in overall performance compared to any $50K, 2009-2011 import..
start sucking my balls
n1u2t3z4 6 months ago
@n1u2t3z4 ill take the 5.0 GT with the manual trans, 3.55 gears interrior upgrade and the brembo brake kit. 40grand leaving me with 10 for mods. (vortech blower? tune suspension drop and beefed up control arms.) what import are you getting (new)? an STI or evo i suppose? there good cars but they offer no theatre for me. And for a 2.5 they offer very poor epa ratings. The mustang matches the M3 for performance and stock vs stock ill take the mustang over the STI.. (canadian prices)
DaBluedude100 5 months ago
I am totally Mopar and that is what I drive, but with the 5K difference in price, you can easily put the SRT 8 in its place with some motor work/mods. SRT 8 though can't be beat for looks, the Challenger is just nothing but BADASS hands down, no matter what motor is in it!
13612 6 months ago
I have a 2011 challenger rt automatic, same car. I got the 0-60 timer on evic, and did it in 4.82 seconds, stock. Whoever said 0-60 in 5.7 seconds doesnt know how to drive.
But then at the same time, once in a while the car has some "dead spots" where I hit the accelerator expecting power and it isnt there..... Why?
TheJellybean1988 6 months ago
@TheJellybean1988 poor computer timing. Get an aftermarket tuner. Youl see better throttle response, better shift points, and better fuel economy. Youl also probabally unlock a little horsepower and definitely some torque. BEST MOD YOU CAN MAKE FOR YOUR MONEY. oh and if anything goes wrong. Just reinstall your original tuning and get the warranty work done.
DaBluedude100 5 months ago
Its not just the car, its the driver too. A good driver in the Mustang could run away from an SRT8 in the real world, if not on the track.
Here's the problem for both cars - $4 gas. Plus, police have their own Chargers and Challegers too. No more boaty Catalinas and Furys.
paktype 7 months ago
@paktype haha 4$ gas is cheap as fuck! SMOKE EM WHILE YOU GOT EM!
DaBluedude100 5 months ago
2012 mustang boss 302. end of story.
stromghouls 7 months ago
lol, might I direct you to the 2011 Mustang Boss 302.
bmelcher9 7 months ago
It sucks that this newer Challenger do not got a manual trans compared to the classic one in the "Bullitt" flick.
SpyroTDragon 7 months ago
Too bad the Challenger is fat heavy and slow. Hahaha
Ford4Lyfe7 7 months ago
How do you compare a GT to a SRT??
devantecrim1550 7 months ago
Omg mustangs sucks!!!!!!! Fuck ford and its shitty plastic crap.
Bigalexander52 7 months ago
one corner and all this american crap lose to a simple lotus elise
azir64 7 months ago
@azir64 these are muscle cars. not made for competing against sport cars. if you want american cars that kick european cars' ass then look up the corvette ZR1 or 2012 viper. the ZR1 being one of the fastest in the world right now
steriods4champions 7 months ago
If only the new challenger wasnt a fatass.
krasus32605 7 months ago
The original 68 Mustang used in the McQueen movie could beat both its new counterparts. I'd bet my life on it. Can't beat the original 60's muscle cars. They weren't weighted down with all the earth-friendly crap of today.
Hot4Hutch 7 months ago
Edmunds you're stupid as shit. You're comparing an srt8 to a bullitt. It's pretty much a gt. The only people who buy challengers anywhere are black people who wanna put 22's on it and some gay paint job. Do a real fuckin comparison.
militarypunk87 7 months ago
@militarypunk87:"The only people who buy challengers anywhere are black people who wanna put 22's"
racist and dumb.
I know four people who own Cobra Mustangs, three are black and one is a lesbian. Overall, good people and great cars w/ stock tires.
I'll take my Chally Classic anyday, about $10k cheaper, looks way better and much nicer on the open highway.
razumfrackle 7 months ago
@razumfrackle How ithe fuck is that racist? It's true. 90% of the people I have seen in a challenger are black and most had some big rims on it. And dumb? That's your opinion dude.
militarypunk87 7 months ago
new challenger's have 7.0 hemi
matthewchckenhead12 8 months ago
@matthewchckenhead12 don't you mean a 6.4?
steriods4champions 7 months ago
hahaha if only you cold spell bullet
iiSh4d0wsxD 8 months ago
@iiSh4d0wsxD thats a joke right?
triplecstyle 8 months ago
@iiSh4d0wsxD If only you could spell "could".
Self burn...
azir64 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
iiSh4d0wsxD says, "hahaha if only you cold spell bullet"
triplecstyle replies, "thats a joke right?"
azir64 piles on, "If only you could spell "could"
That made my morning.
razumfrackle 7 months ago
Lmao... Piece of shit mustang :)
KillaCamRon405 8 months ago
@KillaCamRon405 sure the 425 hp Challenger is gonna look pretty good next to the 315hp Bullitt. But put it next to a Shelby GT500 and i think there might be a different story.
dracox0 8 months ago 2
@dracox0 well if ya want to go that route then put the GT500 up against a viper. Ill let ya pick a used one at that!!!
geclay 6 months ago
@dracox0 or put it with a new mustang. either way it wins. but damn both cars look SEXY
ogpauly 6 months ago
@dracox0 yeah heres the thing its super charged take it out or put the same one in the challenger buddy
travman11000 5 months ago
@dracox0 uh dude u probably havnt heard about the new 6.4 hemi it will leave the gt500 in the dust
cadillacowboy1 5 months ago
@dracox0 Motor Trend did.......the video should be still on youtube
bano11323 4 months ago in playlist Challenger SRT8
12 seconds ? 13 seconds? Com ON! thats nothing, 10 second car ! weres that one? you aint running 10 , then get your bitch ass car off the line and park it !
GalaticSpaceHero 8 months ago
i actully thought about a bullet
lafreak291 8 months ago
the Challenger is the best!
2229121 9 months ago
challenger srt8 comes manual also idk what this guy is smoking
TAYLORGANG9505 9 months ago
@TAYLORGANG9505 when it first came out it was ONLY in manual. learn ur facts dude
iandude454 8 months ago
@iandude454 Negative... you have the internet google it. or search on Allpar.com or even wiki im sure you will see you dont know as much as you think
austinbbmopar 8 months ago
@austinbbmopar you are wrong. look on wikipedia under third gen first paragraph. im right.
iandude454 8 months ago
@iandude454 then it says under 2009 "In addition to the SRT8, which remained unchanged except for the optional 6 speed manual"
austinbbmopar 8 months ago
@austinbbmopar very true, but the fact of the matter is they tested the 08. you responded with saying it comes in a manual as well. i corrected you and you denied correction. you later found out to find that i was correct in correcting you deeming me the victor in this controversy. GOOD DAY TO YOU SIR!
iandude454 8 months ago
@iandude454 NO, Taylorgang9505 said that..... i told him "NOT IN 2008 bro" The first thing you said was it ONLY came in MANUAL.... how can you be right if in 2008 THEY ONLY came in an AUTOMATIC
austinbbmopar 8 months ago
@austinbbmopar ah thats where i have been mistaken. i meant to say automatic. this was a mistake but the truth of what i was proving is in the information i provided. due to the fact that he said only manual then i said it again means it was a typing mistake. forgive me for my mistake i meant to start off with it came in automatic only. i back that fact up with my comment saying third gen paragraph one which says it only came in automatic. just a typo. but i was saying it was only automatic
iandude454 8 months ago
@austinbbmopar here is the link and the sentence. All (7119) 2008 models were SRT8s and equipped with the 6.1 L (370 cu in) Hemi and a 5-speed AutoStick automatic transmission.
iandude454 8 months ago
@iandude454 AUTO STICK IS NOT A MANUAL TRANSMISSION!!! Show me a clutch pedel in a AUTO STICK!!!!! You just wrote "AutoStick automatic transmission"
austinbbmopar 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iandude454 AUTO STICK IS NOT A MANUAL TRANSMISSION!!! Show me a clutch pedel in a AUTO STICK!!!!! You just wrote "AutoStick automatic transmission"
austinbbmopar 8 months ago
@TAYLORGANG9505 Not in 2008 bro....
austinbbmopar 8 months ago
@TAYLORGANG9505 at first you could only get it in automatic
GMCman82 8 months ago
@TAYLORGANG9505 in 2008 the challengers didnt have manual transmissions but in 2009 all challengers had the manual option
2001FordF1504x4 8 months ago
@TAYLORGANG9505 when it first came out it was only available in auto...but now u can get a manual
sergsrt8 8 months ago
such a sickener the challenger isnt available in manual
RehyBoiiiiiiiii 9 months ago
CHALLENGER SRT8 RULES
rurmundo 9 months ago
Are you kidding me? You're going to call the Challenger better because it's got more god damn buttons on the steering wheel? It's not about that! It's about being a fucking bad ass! Both cars are bad ass! I don't give a shit how many buttons they have! Although I did wish the Challenger was available with a manual...
SuperWhoopass 9 months ago 6
@SuperWhoopass it is......
ken0is0gay0fan0club 9 months ago
@ken0is0gay0fan0club The guy said it wasn't.......
SuperWhoopass 9 months ago
@SuperWhoopass This was in 2008. The 2009 and 2010 had a 6 spd manual as an option, and it is standard on the 2011 with the auto as an option.
peteyjamesg 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SuperWhoopass well he is wrong....
ken0is0gay0fan0club 8 months ago
@SuperWhoopass Its been available with a manual for maybe a year or so but the very first ones did not
blue1973charger 8 months ago
@SuperWhoopass I agree completely! Though, you'll be happy to hear that the Challenger is available with a 6-speed manual.
drewdlecam 7 months ago
@SuperWhoopass It has been since 2009.
NYCubeMan 7 months ago
@SuperWhoopass the challenger does have a manual trans available
Pioneers22014 6 months ago
@SuperWhoopass No manual, less fun. That's because i like vintage cars, no buttons at all. Just raw power.
MrHeavysteel 6 months ago
@SuperWhoopass
some challenger's have manual :)
roky0devil 6 months ago
@SuperWhoopass it does come with a 6speed manual
Hoveegsauseeg 5 months ago
@SuperWhoopass It is available with a manual tranny...
strikerz2x 5 months ago
Comment removed
TheJackedGamer 4 months ago
@SuperWhoopass It has been able to be manual since 2009.
TheJackedGamer 4 months ago
@SuperWhoopass it is... they gave it to the challenger cuz its an over all better car in this comparence
betwwen these cars
94probewithheaders 4 months ago
Comment removed
bano11323 4 months ago in playlist Challenger SRT8
@SuperWhoopass I think they picked the Challenger in this test because its faster to 60, quarter mile, slalom, better ride, better interior, better exterior, and oh yeah more buttons to push......Super whoop ass did you even watch the video??? Challenger has been available with a manual since 2009, 6speed with Viper trans, anyway american muscle all day!!!!
bano11323 4 months ago in playlist Challenger SRT8
@SuperWhoopass Dreams come true: Challenger R/T has a 6-speed manual.;-)
Sizuykeks 3 months ago
@SuperWhoopass Congratulations buddy! It does have a manual.
TheDigitalUndead 3 months ago
The moral of the story is that you "usually" get what you pay for. $5400 gets me quite a few performance upgrades on the Pony.
FastPonyGT 9 months ago
Every compare video has the same comments....bottom line with enough money you could make a fiesta go fast. I drive my car everyday and it makes me grin. I hope whatever you are driving it does the same for you. Cheers.
scoobydoob1e 9 months ago
Bullitts are fast?
Username1284 10 months ago
húhu_pãsst_hìèr_nét_reîn_äbá_ich_bìn_sõ_ëinsàm_will_jémànd_mît_mïå_schréìbëñ
KittyaaShelliaa505 10 months ago
@NaziJewNikka No, you will keep UP with me with a GT-R, but it just isn't quite as fast as the ZR1.
acdcgreat 10 months ago
@acdcgreat the gtr is faster than a zr1 but thats only in a half a mile after half zria has the top speed advantage
a5kylar 9 months ago
@a5kylar No the fuck it isn't! Zr-1 has stomped the GTR, the R8, GTR-3, into the ground! There's even videos of it don't try and play off that bull shit. If I could get a ZR-1 i'd make it 4wheel drive and give it twin super chargers then laugh at just about anything that I pulled up next to.
johnnyrckt 9 months ago
@johnnyrckt GT-3 smoked ZR1. You got it wrong. Porsche RUF with 2.6s 0-62mph kills anything.
m5p944 9 months ago
LMAO!! ZR-1 Has beat the GTR-3 into dust and RUF are AFTERMARKET tuners.Meaning after you buy your car you can take it to them pay a shit load more cash to go a little faster.
Go look for the videos of the ZR-1 stomping those jap and euro cars down. It was so beautiful. I wish Ford came back with the GT and made it TT push it over 1100bhp easy. gtr is 4wd it might beat it off the line but it wont stay there for long.
johnnyrckt 9 months ago
@a5kylar ZR1=better grip, better brakes, better acceleration. ZR1=better car. Handling isn't quite on par with the GT-R, so I'll give "Godzilla" that much. It's got that awd advantage, but the ZR1 has smoked it before and will smoke it again.
acdcgreat 9 months ago
@acdcgreat But imagine if you took the power advantage away from the ZR1 and the GTR made the same numbers at the wheel, sadly the ZR1 lose, Its a great car on paper and on a little boys bedroom wall, but the ZR1 just isn't usable everyday. the GTR was designed with all weather driving in mind, do you think a ZR1 owner would drive it in the snow? Hell no to afraid of crashing b/c it cant handle anything but dry pavement.
adamslurch71 9 months ago
@NaziJewNikka It's called magnetic ride control. Put that car in sport mode. And race around the green hell over in Germany. It'll beat your precious S2000, by over a minute. Stop acting like you know what you're talking about.
acdcgreat 10 months ago
@NaziJewNikka I will, in a ZR1. Dumbass.
acdcgreat 10 months ago
mustang is so old and tired. they just keep redoing it with little changes. make it look like an original, then we`ll talk. it`s all about styling and challenger copies the original. mustang looks like a gym shoe.
healthyamerican 11 months ago
challenger looks great. goes great. feel's great. pure win. though the weight of the car is insane. in little light cars that horsepower can pull 10's. the price you pay for luxury I guess.
laurence265 11 months ago
I love it when ricers brag about how their engine puts out x amount of power per liter. Let me know when you have one that puts out over 9,000hp and cover the quarter mile in 4.8 seconds at 300mph.
Or let me know when you build a real truck. Just like with other things, Americans are just plain bigger than Japs. ;-)
dougdangger 11 months ago
@dougdangger let me know how those big ol americans cars go round a corner . . . . . .
StolenMonkey 10 months ago
@dougdangger you are one of the few americans i have respect for anymore:) you know what your talking about
michelR90 10 months ago
well I own a 2007 supercharged Gt Mustang and a 2010 challenger RT, I think this comparrison is a little off, they should have compared the mustang GT500 to the Challenger srt8 because then it would have put the 2 companies top line cars against each other, or they should have compared the RT challenger and the GT mustang bullitt
Just my opinion. It wouldnt have gone horribly wrong for the GT500 !!!
like I said though I love em all, nothing like american muscle!
midniterunband 11 months ago
@midniterunband Yeah, that'd be a much better match up! I was thinking the same thing
Wojoray 11 months ago
challenger fast as a bullet!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. MY ASS!!!!!! and no manual tranny? no go for me!
scbjgs 11 months ago
challenger fast as a bullet!? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. MY ASS!!!!!!
scbjgs 11 months ago
Bullitt? its bullet dude LOL
santorz 11 months ago
@santorz its bullitt as in the bullitt mustang from the movie
jordtizzle 11 months ago
more fair would have been to compare it to the r/t.
kg0277 11 months ago
ford is shit :P
mrmoose33 11 months ago
I dont think one can really know which car is better when there are different drivers for each one of them. The drivers play the most significant role
Notis59 1 year ago
I still don't get what this idiot up there is talking about when he speaks of the MR2. In a class with the Boxter and Miata it just screeeeeeeeeeeams vagina... seriously.
dobadriver 1 year ago
Dudes ! This is funny shit ! I have listened to these arguments for 40 YEARS ! ! They are always the same ! FUUUUNNY ! I have raced many of different cars and I got to say .... these drivers SUCK ! We will never know what these cars can really do until they put some proffesionals in the seats ! My Grandmother can shift and drive better than these Goobers !
mopart426 1 year ago
lets see the new 5.0. that challenger is a joke compared to it
spikejones4567 1 year ago
this shit is a old challenger i got a 2010 with a 6 speed and its a fucking monster i got super 44 on it a it runs 11.9 . the drive sucks on here flat out
tonytone912 1 year ago
ya dumbass u got turbo lets turbo challenger an see dumbass
thiskidgarrett 1 year ago
Comment removed
xCh34pShOtx 1 year ago
i'm glad this video was made in 2008, cuz the challenger ain't even got shit on a factory GT as of 2011 ;)
budfrogluv 1 year ago
@budfrogluv 2011 srt8 has a 392 hemi 470hp cant wait to see it put a hurting to the 5.0s and camaros.
svt89 1 year ago
Nice. Check out my 70 Charger R/T SE 440 Six Pack
70CHARGERREGISTRY 1 year ago
U SEEE U PUT A 2008 MUSTANG FULLY AND ADODGE 2008 FULLLY EVEN WIT A AUTO DODGE STILL WILL WOHIP FORDS ASS!! AND WAIT TILL EARLY 2012 late 2011 DODGE IS GONNA BE BACK AND WAY MEANER!!
joey187 1 year ago
The Mustang HP numbers range from Motor trends 412 hp to other test of almost 420. All dyno's do not tread the same. They can differ 30+hp. just throwing that out for ppl that don't know.
wesleymattison00 1 year ago
(Gunforme) Your right on the numbers. I am just going from the reviews i saw online. I do not own any of these cars so can only go on what I read. I can say that the Challenger looks way better than the mustang and goes more back to the old school days with its curves and lines. I almost bought a black RT a few weeks back but need a roof on the house b4 I jump into that. Thanks for your comment. Question :what is the difference between the RT and SRT?
wesleymattison00 1 year ago
DODGE ALL THE WAY!!!
drMINDdamage 1 year ago
I love it how he says now this is where the mustang goes horribly wrong.. Like common when doesnt a piece of shit go wrong
bradleyg96 1 year ago
2011 Mustang 5.0 is a different story. Out does both the hemi and ss camaro. All nasty toys but ford is on top this year.
wesleymattison00 1 year ago
@wesleymattison00 Wait til dodge answers back. :P Also, didn't they say the challenger was putting out 420hp and the new 2011 Mustang puts out about 417hp? Seems about the same. Lighter mustang may benefit though.
gunforme 1 year ago
@wesleymattison00 meh for now wait till 2011 early 2012 WE ARE COMIN BABY !!
joey187 1 year ago
not a fair challange anyway, 425 hp vs 315
tenormayne 1 year ago
@tenormayne You have to add the weight to power ratio. so it almosts even outs
72GranTorino1 1 year ago
@72GranTorino1 yeah sure, but these cars arent even in the same class lol now, take a new 5.0 and put it against an srt and see what happens!
tenormayne 1 year ago
@tenormayne Again. Power to weight ratio....the challenger has more weight so it needs more engine...where the mustang is lighter and has big power and remember the new boss 302? it has like 460 something hp....which...is about the same as the srt8 but the mustang could win...cause it is lighter and uses less power to go fast
72GranTorino1 1 year ago
@tenormayne lol yea but then I here all the time about how the gt500 is so much better not fair any way right?
srt4driver52 1 year ago
@srt4driver52 gt 500 would be more than a match for the srt8! or even the new 5.0
tenormayne 1 year ago
bah..well, nice cars ! i prefer challenger's look, but mustang's sound = awsum !
metallinen1 1 year ago
soooooo how much is each? XD
blackman2462 1 year ago
"in this is were everything for the mustang goes horrible worng" lmmfao priceless
dumbf7y 1 year ago
Maybe both cars are shit? I'm sorry Ford, but... Live rear axle? Both cars are blocky and just awful looking, I hate the retro muscle car look. DESIGN SOMETHING NEW! People do it all the time! Plus... 5.5 or so seconds for 0-60 with a 5+ liter v8? A Mazdaspeed 6 with a 2.3l supercharged engine can do that. If a Japanese or German company was working with this kind of displacement, they would destroy these steroid shooting redneck jokes.
MrJamesonStyles 1 year ago
@MrJamesonStyles they could use a supercharged engine, but why not put a bigger one in that offers more durability and low to mid range power? Then you ask, why not supercharge the bigger engine then? Well as the engine becomes more powerful, the rest of the car must follow such as heat dissipation, suspension, fuel consumption, gear box. There is a reason trucks have have a high engine displacement and muscle cars are going for that exact same thing. If you want more, do some modifications.
helgih580 1 year ago
Im all for the Mustang in this i fucking love the green and those builit rims Fucking want it
ford1979truck 1 year ago
Wonder how many 1 wheels they did in order to actually get like like .20 min of burnout footage...
My 2.0L 4 cly is faster and costs half and looks better....
But still.. Very nice car.. (challenger)
Mustangs r ugly as fuck! They haven't changed looks in ages, MORE SLEEK NEW LOOK my ass
21fuzz21 1 year ago
The 2011 Challenger srt8's are going to have a 392c.i 6.4L Hemi.
dooformuladlx 1 year ago
Nope, a bullit from a 9mm goes faster.
GlennFalconiVEVO 1 year ago
Let me redraw You Tube.
heartlessvietboy 1 year ago
a tank like the Challenger is quicker than the lighter Bullit in 1/4 mile ... hmmm both are nice, Bullit looks a little bland compared to the Dodge. Last I seen, Challenger does come manual now?
gjg50 1 year ago
just about lost it at 2:22 stupid dodge i hate them
intel7337 1 year ago
surely for the extra money you pay for the challenger you could make the mustang a lot faster for 4500 dollars mustang wins everytime
M374EVL 1 year ago
13.7? For that big ass motor? HAH HAH HAH! My 3rd Gen MR2 Turbo is rated exactly the same thing, and my motor is 1/3 smaller.
24okay 1 year ago 12
@24okay and how many times do u think u could do a full throttle launch before it starts getting slower and tappier. lol..
not long.
Flappyization 1 year ago
@Flappyization A lot longer than some big ass muscle car, that's for sure. There is a reason why most of them sit outside someone's house collecting rust and dust, praying for the day someone comes along and gives a full rebuild.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay yeah. i got nothin
Flappyization 1 year ago
@24okay lol dude put some slicks on that mustang and see the time drop half a second. anyway edmunds' drivers are notorious for being conservative
BayAreaMuscleZ28 1 year ago
@BayAreaMuscleZ28 You do have a point there. I am not saying imports are better than domestics though. I know a muscle maxed out classes most imports (as there are few that can compete with the muscles). My Mr2 however is not, as I have yet to see a single one break 9's. I was just saying.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay And your car is 1/4 the weight and more aerodynamic
ChanceGTO1967 1 year ago
@24okay your comparing a turboed mr2 to a stock srt-8....way to go retard
gogetatr12 1 year ago
@gogetatr12 MR2 Turbo is STOCK dumbass. If it comes that way from factory without later modifications, it is stock, regardless if it has forced induction.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay im sorry i missed were a turbo is still a fucking turbo factory or not.
gogetatr12 1 year ago
@gogetatr12 You're exact words were stock. If a car comes with it, it is stock. Now if you want to bitch because a lil four cylinder has a lil forced induction (which the CT20B is still a small turbo) and runs the same times as a big ass engine in a car that has twice the size of the motor, then that's fine. Just recognize it is still stock vs stock on times.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
Um, idk what you're smokin but the MR2 comes nowhere close to an SRT Challenger. Gen 3 MR2? Those have got to be the girliest looking of the bunch. I mean, I prefer a man's car with a man's engine, not some girly little 4cyl that sounds as attractive as a swarm of bees. Why are you talking about the MR2 ratings? I doubt you even own one because can't you just drive it yourself and tell us how it is instead of speaking of ratings?
dobadriver 1 year ago
@dobadriver Really? I don't own one? Really? Why don't you have a look at my channel. I have 3 and selling one so I can put a gen 3 in my widebody. I like how you call it a girly car, when you rarely see women driving it. Although I do it give it to you, when they made the first gen MR2, the woman was their target customer. Lots of women have owned the first gen, not so many the 2nd gen (Maybe the N/A), and third gen? wow. Woman car all the day. Anyways, the 2gen motor is done on mine
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
Hey man, you don't look at a video then tell people that a car that is smaller, slower and more appealing to a female fan base is better. I'm sure you like your car and that's fine, everyone is entitled to their opinion.. but you threw the first punch. Look how many morons liked your post you made. It's people like you that give people false knowledge of vehicle. Now theres a bunch of dumb kids out there thinking that an MR2 is an incredibly fast man's car.
dobadriver 1 year ago
@dobadriver Then I implore you to watch "Supra RZ vs Toyota MR2 (Rev3)" stock vs stock. It's simple, someone races a car 1/4 mile and throws the viewer a time. Check the time on the MR2, then give me a ring back on here. Thanks.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
Im not saying they are slow. But what do those cars weigh anyways? I'm guessing less then 2500lbs? Besides, the Jap versions were faster. You said you had a gen 3. They are slower then gen 2 and they are quite girly looking. I'd say if I ever were to buy one it would be a gen 2... but i would never buy one. I like big comfortable cars with v8 power. Not a little go cart with a turbo that will die over the years.
dobadriver 1 year ago
@dobadriver Sir, the MKII MR2 Turbo that was produced in the USA from 91-95 is the CHassis I am referring to. The Gen 3 Motor is The 3sgte as is in the MKII, which in the USA normally comes the tuned down version of the Gen 2 motor. Not Gen 3 MR2 which would be called the MKIII, which only has 140hp using the 1ZZ motor. Does that clear up the confusion? Because in the USA, only gen 1 and gen 2 3sgte here. Japan, gen 1, gen 2, and gen 3 3sgte available. Gen 4 3sgte only in Calinda GT-Four.
24okay 1 year ago
@dobadriver Another thing... Our cars don't die over the years. More Japanese cars are still driveable with way more miles on them then your domestics. Don't give me that shit. Toyotas are by far the most diehard cars known to man. American cars are fast, very powerful, and people pay a lot for restored ones. But how many sit dusty in people's garages and driveways? How many 66' mustangs you see with 300k miles and still being driven? Compared to our sporty Japanese cars? Yeah, thanks.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
Really? How many 70's and 80's jap cars do I see around here? None really, if I do they are rusted to shit. I had a 1978 Chrysler with a 360. The engine still ran and the only problem i had with the car was when someone t boned me and I had to get rid of it 2 years ago. My bro had a 1966 Chrysler 300 with a 383, and if you knew what you were talking about you'd know they ran on leaded gas( so would a 66 mustang). It's amazing that the car ran great until 2002 with the wrong gas.
dobadriver 1 year ago
@dobadriver Ok, so you take your engine, get inducted hardened valve seats for your "Leaded" gasoline engines... What's so hard about that? They are "Classics" right? To be quite fair, you rarely see older model Japanese cars because not many were being bought in the USA during their early age. You have to remember a lot of Americans had fathers who fought in WWII and would boycott them. Also, I see more Datsun/Nissan 240z out there (car for it's time) than anything else, still running.
24okay 1 year ago
@dobadriver Oh and after you have the valve seats hardened induced with the exhaust valve seats, you run 89 octane. That should keep it going.... I took an Engine overhaul Class dealing with mostly domestic engines.
24okay 1 year ago
@24okay
Um, most people never bothered to do that and I'm not 50, I'm 23. By the time I drove these cars it would be too late anyways.. i would have been better off rebuilding the engine. There were lots of Japanese cars sold here in Canada, but here most have rusted to nothing by the time they were 10 yrs old.
dobadriver 1 year ago