@YewMakeMeLolz u mad ?whole world chooses the rpg over the crapy javelin. btw ur retard u just said that a grenade-luncher from 1960 beats javelin twice... go and watch some more propaganda nubbb
Very impressive … they destroyed a tank produced in 1961 with an anti-tank missile made in 1996. Good job but with a 35 year delay. Try to do the same with a T-90 or an M1 Abrams.
Но судя по всему javelin еще и обладает термобаррическим зарядом. Тут все зависит от того насколько гермитичен танк и насколько прочные люки на нем. Если танк хорошо гермитизирован и люки были прочно закреплены - все хорошо. Если хоть один люк чуть-чуть шолохнется - пизда танкистам (их размажет по стенкам танка)... В общем, мелочей очень много.
Допустим что танку не повезло и ракета навелась на него. Скорее всего ракета наведется на излучение прожекторов, а не двигателя... То есть она попадает под большим углом сначала в фонарь, детонирует и только потом кумулятивная струя достигает лобовой брони башни.
Вариант_2 (Цель скрыта от стрелка естественным ландшафтом или постройками): Стрелок вводит необходимые данные для того, чтобы ракета не полетела хуй пойми куда. И производит пуск. Ракета взмывает вверх, естественно танкист ее замечает и включает ШТОРу. Визуальное определение типа цели невозможно, из-за помех ШТОРы Javelin просто не распознает сигнатуру танка. Тут вмешиваются многочисленные помехи (горящие машины, дома, мусорные баки), в данном случае ракета может ударить куда угодно.
Вариант_1 (Цель находится в прямой видимости.): Стрелок пытается выполнить прицеливание по танку, но это практически невозможно (всеравно что смотреть на сонце в телескоп).
Как работает система ШТОРа (подобные системы защиты есть на разных танках и выполненны они по разному, но я рассмотрю только эту):
На танк устанавливается несколько инфракрасных прожекторов. В случае необходимости, опастности, ИК прожектора включают. И они начинают излучать очень яркий свет в инфракрасном диапазоне углом примерно 120 градусов.
0:24 - flash in tank center. not near warhead, obviously there was explosives in tank
ps: SHTORa system declines rockets with infrared guidance with 80% chance
from me: Thers alot of Myths around US weaponry, remember the Stealth planes at least.. there is a reason why Russian weaponry is cheaper and better, us govn't is ruled by weapon sellers and bankers.. they start wars and kill peoples for financial profit to themselves only..
There is no way a High-speed camera was used for this video. If you look closely at the blue plastic sheeting between frames at 22 and 23 seconds you can see a huge difference in it position due to the wind. High- speed would show this change over about 50 frames. Shame, it would have looked beautiful.
Its Fake. As we can see on 0:24 (how already say abrg100) rocket from Javelin doesn't get in tank. She explodes near. But tank explosive how rocket took center. From this we can understand that in the tank was laid explosives.
If you understood weaponry you would understand that most American projectiles explode above and not on contact with the target. This allow for greater damage. Everyone says its fake when it is clearly not. What would be the benefit of faking something like this.......nothing.
I fifteen years duty in army. And I know what I say. Yours Javelin is piece of sheat. He can't blow up T-62 in two. Meanwhile Bole if his misslie explodes near target. So you can not tell me tales about yours "magic" Javelin.
let's not have a fight with the russians if we can help it
maybe we did stick dynamite in the tank or maybe our missile is that good - all i know is when we have used up all our javellins the russians will still be rolling toward us in their tanks- B(ae)ritish army will have 2 fall back 2 our ILAWs INTERIM light anti-tank thing -what does that say about our armament levels &weapons procurement? Name another army with an interim anything! maybe the ruskies will have "for the time-being" tanks:-)
@socomsix19 and try to shoot m48 patton USA was using that when russia used t-62 ( im not russian I hawe nothing against americans ore you just want to say my opinion)
@McDiezel Ignorance? FYI, Russia doesn't use 80's technology anymore. They use T-90s which are pretty modern day tanks. Talking about me being ignorant my ass.
@BigFuzzySperm Haha wow your a retard. you dont even know who your talking to do you? if i met you in person i would beat your ass. trained in mixed martial arts and working on a 2nd degree in Brazilian jujitsu. If you think thats funny i would like you to laugh in my face in person, you wouldnt have any teeth. The gavelin can penetrate any known armor in the world and i have proof.
Also stop pretending you're a US Army Ranger. With your level of intelligence its a huge insult to their organization. I doubt you're trained in any form of combat armed or unarmed let alone Brazilian Jujitsu. So yes I think its VERY funny. Go fuck your hat you waste of human resource.
@combatboots711 i would gladly give you my adress and you can meet me so i can kick your ass, or i kid give you my skype user name and we could talk face to face in front of all my other friends who were fellow rangers. your a waste of human resource, your probably some fat ass who lays around and lives in his mothers basement and trolls all day long. dont call me a kid you ass hole, im a full grown man. I have a feeling your the kid here since you have no actual facts to prove me wrong, sad...
Well considering that just goes in from the top and exploits a weak point it doesn't show how much armour it can punch through. Not a feat of strength if you ask me. The RPG-29 however can punch through the hull of a Challenger 2(Thats a British tank just so you know). And please I'd love your address phone number and skype. And I don't know where I called you kid...
@BigFuzzySperm Yes i can give you a variable source on that you ass hole, that is a well known fact. currently in the world it can destroy any known armored tank or vehicle in the world with ease. If you dont think what im saying is true see for yourself, look it up. and im not a lasy ass bastard who lays around playing video games all day. It's funny you bring up COD 4 because the realism of it is that your probably the one who plays cod 4. please stop trying to argue with facts. fuck off
The Javelin is a for sure killer if it hits its target. I don't think there's a tank that can stay acceptably operational after being hit by one. The truth with modern missiles, is, whatever it's designed to destroy, it almost all the time will. The only hope you have is destroying or diverting the weapon before it hits its target. The new Russian T-90s are boasted to have great capabilities of doing this and furthermore being able to take the damage better than any other tank.
@sjg132 I think the US Military has to make a new tank. Unless the gunner gets a really lucky shot on a missile, new foreign weaponry can't really be stopped.
@KingSalami19D And I hear the T-72 was a death trap where hitting it on the top would ignite all the munitions, but still, I wouldn't want this Javelin to hit me...
@aero3132 That is correct, more so with the bottom of the tank though. If the T72 rolled over even a small explosive device which was detonated below the turret the entire tank's magazine would ignite because it is located in the bottom of the turret housing.
@Shoppa360 do you even understand how this works. It's fire and forget. He didn't move cuz he wanted to see the tank go BOOM. In REAL war he could fire it from cover and after it's shot out he could move positions. Fire and forget.
Notice that the guy with the javelin was waiting until the missle hit the tank and then he moved...now in a real combat situation, will that a good weapon to use against people with Ak's and sniper rifles? just standing there while everyone is taking aim at your head?
$12000 per launcher and $1500 for one single missle...
I wouldnt recommend this on the Battlefield since it likely takes 5 mins to fire a round, not to mention its accurate or not, and infantry are pretty expose when using this expensive crap.
@tungkid95 you do know that they can target an enemy vehicle from behind cover to right? and its not crap as it hits its targets from above. were the armor is thinner ;)
whats weird is that in mw2 u can get another javelin missle by picking up a small bag on the floor, plus the explosions are larger for some reason, AND u can run around with it like you have superhuman strength :S
its a shame that a Javelin missile costs 60 grand a pop, if we get the price down without sacrificing the amazing power that thing has I could see this easily becoming the main AT weapon for NATO forces
@abrg100 wow im offended now (in the online Russia vs U.S.A battle over military supremacy) the Javelin hit it anyway ... why would they need to cheat?
@superiguana1 some people just refuse to believe their tank can be destroyed I guess.. even though that weapon is designed only to kill tanks and kill any tank
"Негативный". С заложили взрывное взрывов идти не вниз. Если у вас медленное движение кадры источником взрыва четко приходит снаряда Javalin не посадили взрывчатых веществ. Даже если есть система для обнаружения дальним или тепла руководствоваться missles, большинство американских missles имеют системы построить в их борьбе акта или вспышек и радиоэлектронного подавления.
This is a real video guys.I'v seen Javelin launches on reliable shows such as future weapons against tanks and they never survive a hit.Oh and spacemarine1999 do you know anything about war.This weapon is a AT a tank will never survive a Javelin missle.
@14Kristian41 your a fuckin retard, i work around these things all the time, thats exactly what it looks like, its not a damn rpg, its MEANT to DESTROY tanks not disable or put a dent in them, its the most powerful rocket launcher in the world
@iltusm176 I meant when the javelin shoots out, it looks like one of those fake credit card commercials or something. the rocket just looks animated. obviously I know that its real
@Jeisuli The missile isnt fake dude the explosion is. Javelins have nearly a perfect kill ratio. They just made it look fancy. You can tell also that they moved the sound of the explosion up with the explosion itself. Normally it would take around 3 seconds for the sound of the explosion to reach you. Also if a javelin punched thru where the ammo/fuel is kept you would have a similar explosion. Again it depends on the tank. You would never have such a explosion with a Abrams.
wonder how many of those missiles failed to ignite its propellant, and just dropped to the ground. Wonder how much time operators had to run if that happened, if it would blow up on a timer, or impact, or just go dead after ignition failure.
@joe735 these weapons have to travel a distance before arming, so you dont need to run away if the main propellant fails to ignite. Even the far less advanced and unguided M72 has to travel atleast 11m before it arms, otherwise if it lands before that it wont arm and wont go off
theres no way that was a real tank tanks have 2 inche thick or more armor all over.. that javalin coulndt make it into scrap like that with no turret anywhere....
if you look at the second explosion theres a purple flash at the tracks before the missle inpacts that flash is explosive cord detonating secondary explosives in the tank.... so its fake also the missles dont make flames like that gas was added.. explosions are black and have no if any flames... it was staged
i would bet a million dollars it would still completely destroy the tank and kill everyone inside... i can't even think of anything besides the ground that the javelin and that missile in particular could not blow the fuk to smithereens.
Yeah we call that MAD. A topol gets a polaris which gets more topols which get more polaris and MM III's which get more topols and R-36's which will get more polaris and MM III's and b-52's, b-1 and b-2s coming from the north for you, Then everybody dies, including you, and nobody wins. idiot.
I really doubt it. Although the Abrams is a sturdy tank and has a perfect service history (not one has been damaged beyond repair during its thirty years of service), the Javelin system was specifically designed to obliterate armored vehicles, regardless of size and armor. And I'm sure that the weapons experts have not only used obsolete foreign equipment, but also US vehicles to test their new weapon on.
@DZgoodTimes The US Army tells us that the Javelin can destroy ANY tank on the battlefield. However they also tell us that the M1 Abrams can defend itself from ANY rocket attack. So I'm not sure how to answer that question lol
couldn't blow up an american tank that easily.
420assfuck 1 month ago
lol m1 abrahams got destroyed by a rpg-3 wich is one of the first ones , un fucking believeble,,,
1nEGOR 1 month ago
@1nEGOR You mad? We go javelin's And you only got some 1960 RPG's? HAhahah i lough in your face
YewMakeMeLolz 1 month ago
@YewMakeMeLolz u mad ?whole world chooses the rpg over the crapy javelin. btw ur retard u just said that a grenade-luncher from 1960 beats javelin twice... go and watch some more propaganda nubbb
1nEGOR 4 days ago
Very impressive … they destroyed a tank produced in 1961 with an anti-tank missile made in 1996. Good job but with a 35 year delay. Try to do the same with a T-90 or an M1 Abrams.
FuryGearSolid 1 month ago 2
@FuryGearSolid You have no idea what your talking about.
YewMakeMeLolz 1 month ago
0:25 Cloverfield
JarheadRTR 2 months ago
@dan007iel is u'r mum !
hackerisslv 3 months ago
こんなにぐちゃぐちゃになるんだな。
bluegoat14021 3 months ago
Problem with laser guided rockets, is that most new tanks have a defensive system against it, that would simply redirect rockets.
icecremer 5 months ago
I'll take 20!
theG884 5 months ago
FUCK YO TANK!
CoryCDS 5 months ago 8
It's closer than you think?
AldenBaddy 6 months ago
No sound delay from the explosion? :|
kiddybfg 7 months ago 15
@kiddybfg too close
simonandfaerk 5 months ago
@kiddybfg
a blast wave is an area of pressure expanding supersonically outward from an explosive core
wikipedia. org/wiki/ Blast_wave
JAt0m 4 months ago
@JAt0m ...And you decided to tell me for what reason?
kiddybfg 4 months ago
@kiddybfg
it travels faster than normal sounds, so the delay is alot smaller, possibly not even recognizable. just an explanation.
JAt0m 4 months ago
Но судя по всему javelin еще и обладает термобаррическим зарядом. Тут все зависит от того насколько гермитичен танк и насколько прочные люки на нем. Если танк хорошо гермитизирован и люки были прочно закреплены - все хорошо. Если хоть один люк чуть-чуть шолохнется - пизда танкистам (их размажет по стенкам танка)... В общем, мелочей очень много.
abrg100 7 months ago
Допустим что танку не повезло и ракета навелась на него. Скорее всего ракета наведется на излучение прожекторов, а не двигателя... То есть она попадает под большим углом сначала в фонарь, детонирует и только потом кумулятивная струя достигает лобовой брони башни.
abrg100 7 months ago
Вариант_2 (Цель скрыта от стрелка естественным ландшафтом или постройками): Стрелок вводит необходимые данные для того, чтобы ракета не полетела хуй пойми куда. И производит пуск. Ракета взмывает вверх, естественно танкист ее замечает и включает ШТОРу. Визуальное определение типа цели невозможно, из-за помех ШТОРы Javelin просто не распознает сигнатуру танка. Тут вмешиваются многочисленные помехи (горящие машины, дома, мусорные баки), в данном случае ракета может ударить куда угодно.
abrg100 7 months ago
Что будет при боестолкновении:
Вариант_1 (Цель находится в прямой видимости.): Стрелок пытается выполнить прицеливание по танку, но это практически невозможно (всеравно что смотреть на сонце в телескоп).
abrg100 7 months ago
Как работает система ШТОРа (подобные системы защиты есть на разных танках и выполненны они по разному, но я рассмотрю только эту):
На танк устанавливается несколько инфракрасных прожекторов. В случае необходимости, опастности, ИК прожектора включают. И они начинают излучать очень яркий свет в инфракрасном диапазоне углом примерно 120 градусов.
abrg100 7 months ago
И еще объясню некоторые аспекты касающиеся джавелин.
Она не говно, но она и не убивает запросто любой танк.
Как произваодится пуск Javelin:
Вариант_1 (Цель находится в прямой видимости.):
Стрелок выполняет прицеливание, захват цели и производит пуск ракеты.
Вариант_2 (Цель скрыта от стрелка естественным ландшафтом или постройками):
Стрелок вводит необходимые данные для того, чтобы ракета не полетела хуй пойми куда. И производит пуск.
abrg100 7 months ago
in real war javelin are shit
Vyun1969 7 months ago
@Vyun1969 "in real war javelin are shit"
Вы неправы, любой ПТУРС очень эффективен против любого танка, или Т-90, или Abrams, или Leopard-2...
В 90% случаев при попадании ПТУРСа, танк выходит из строя. Даже если этот ПТУРС изготовлен в 1980 году
abrg100 7 months ago
Ahahah Javelin for CCCP muahahahaaha
MegaPagon 8 months ago
I'll translate the most popular comment as i can
0:24 - flash in tank center. not near warhead, obviously there was explosives in tank
ps: SHTORa system declines rockets with infrared guidance with 80% chance
from me: Thers alot of Myths around US weaponry, remember the Stealth planes at least.. there is a reason why Russian weaponry is cheaper and better, us govn't is ruled by weapon sellers and bankers.. they start wars and kill peoples for financial profit to themselves only..
6yka66RUS 8 months ago
from 0:06 to 0:15 i was like wheres the missile now?
SuperPeanut1992 8 months ago
0:02 best part
jeffrahtjuh 11 months ago
There is no way a High-speed camera was used for this video. If you look closely at the blue plastic sheeting between frames at 22 and 23 seconds you can see a huge difference in it position due to the wind. High- speed would show this change over about 50 frames. Shame, it would have looked beautiful.
SueMyChin 11 months ago
Its Fake. As we can see on 0:24 (how already say abrg100) rocket from Javelin doesn't get in tank. She explodes near. But tank explosive how rocket took center. From this we can understand that in the tank was laid explosives.
All the best.
Your Captain Obviousness.
.
Z0mbiner 11 months ago
@Z0mbiner
If you understood weaponry you would understand that most American projectiles explode above and not on contact with the target. This allow for greater damage. Everyone says its fake when it is clearly not. What would be the benefit of faking something like this.......nothing.
HeroOfTheAngels 7 months ago
@HeroOfTheAngels
I fifteen years duty in army. And I know what I say. Yours Javelin is piece of sheat. He can't blow up T-62 in two. Meanwhile Bole if his misslie explodes near target. So you can not tell me tales about yours "magic" Javelin.
Z0mbiner 7 months ago
This Soviet tank is maket (lies)
Severov7 1 year ago
silence.... HOLY SHIIT
Appleheadsk8er 1 year ago
i thas almost identical sound as its in arma armed assault
usmceflips 1 year ago
11 people wernt fast enough for the track team in high school and were stuck throwing the javelin.
strongman17 1 year ago
shitty quality
TurkWith2Legs 1 year ago
i couldent even see it flying down
MultiCarson123 1 year ago
let's not have a fight with the russians if we can help it
maybe we did stick dynamite in the tank or maybe our missile is that good - all i know is when we have used up all our javellins the russians will still be rolling toward us in their tanks- B(ae)ritish army will have 2 fall back 2 our ILAWs INTERIM light anti-tank thing -what does that say about our armament levels &weapons procurement? Name another army with an interim anything! maybe the ruskies will have "for the time-being" tanks:-)
theOGslagster127 1 year ago
see how weak russian tanks are ?? im not affraid of ww3 cause america sure is gonna win it
socomsix19 1 year ago
@socomsix19
not exactly. and this video is bullshit. how can a 40 ton 10 inch steel shell get obliterated by a 20 pound rocket?
Pause at 0:24 See the spark?
Full of explosives that's how.
patrikasLTL 1 year ago
@patrikasLTL America will still win :)
Spitefox 1 year ago
@Spitefox
yeah on TEE VEE
patrikasLTL 1 year ago
@socomsix19 that is old tank and america has no money when ww3 starst :D ( if china stops giving money to you )
pitkakorva 1 year ago
@socomsix19 and try to shoot m48 patton USA was using that when russia used t-62 ( im not russian I hawe nothing against americans ore you just want to say my opinion)
pitkakorva 1 year ago
All I have to say is when he shot that,
he spent as much money as it costs to buy a $10,000 car.
videoman223 1 year ago
@videoman223 Unit cost - $40,000 (missile) $125,000 (reusable Command Launch Unit)
Wikipedia
defmanz 1 year ago
flash in the center of the tank, not near the missile. Immediately clear that a tank advance was laid explosives.
ps RODS system rejects the infrared-guided missiles (with a probability of 80%)
aKaCraZyStaR 1 year ago
always thought it was a t-72 but a t-62 didnt make it look better
if you think your enemys will drive empty tons of steel full of TNT for some great effects
you must be wrong
who cares ... all i know is old stuff own easy new us trash
like the damn old RPG-7 easy takes out an m1a2
yes ITS A NEW TANK !!!! and no RPG -7 IS NOT NEW !!!!
GOT IT ^^
SibirianHusky 1 year ago
Even a M1 abrams would blow up like that.
Javelin hits right at the weak spot...
vava54own 1 year ago
In Soviet Russia, it is the Soviet Tank that hits the Javelin
hermitcleric 1 year ago
@hermitcleric Face it dude! Russian technology is obsolete!
What ever you do, don't attack anyone in the develloped countries cause you will suffer bad.
And this is the proof!
Your tanks does not stand a chance against ours, and even our held hand AT guns kicks your asses!
Be afraid, be very afraid!
McDiezel 1 year ago
@McDiezel Ignorant and irrational mind is ignorant and irrational.
P3RF3CTD3ATH 1 year ago
@P3RF3CTD3ATH Or as in your case live in ignorance in the beliefs that your 80'th technology will win over 00'th technology.
As seen all over the world now for a long time. Javelines takes out soviet tanks on longer range then the tanks can see.
So, ignorant and irrational.
Well!
McDiezel 1 year ago
@McDiezel Ignorance? FYI, Russia doesn't use 80's technology anymore. They use T-90s which are pretty modern day tanks. Talking about me being ignorant my ass.
P3RF3CTD3ATH 1 year ago
That looks more like a T-62 than a T-72 to me.
LucanJacups 1 year ago
@LucanJacups read description please
19texasraised92 1 year ago
@19texasraised92 Whoops, I could haves sworn he said "Probably a T-72" to me.
LucanJacups 1 year ago
@LucanJacups Whoops again, "to me" should be "somewhere in the video."
LucanJacups 1 year ago
MULTIKILL!1!!!11111!!!!!!
iFOOL5 1 year ago
@BigFuzzySperm Haha wow your a retard. you dont even know who your talking to do you? if i met you in person i would beat your ass. trained in mixed martial arts and working on a 2nd degree in Brazilian jujitsu. If you think thats funny i would like you to laugh in my face in person, you wouldnt have any teeth. The gavelin can penetrate any known armor in the world and i have proof.
iltusm176 1 year ago
@iltusm176
Also stop pretending you're a US Army Ranger. With your level of intelligence its a huge insult to their organization. I doubt you're trained in any form of combat armed or unarmed let alone Brazilian Jujitsu. So yes I think its VERY funny. Go fuck your hat you waste of human resource.
combatboots711 1 year ago
@combatboots711 i would gladly give you my adress and you can meet me so i can kick your ass, or i kid give you my skype user name and we could talk face to face in front of all my other friends who were fellow rangers. your a waste of human resource, your probably some fat ass who lays around and lives in his mothers basement and trolls all day long. dont call me a kid you ass hole, im a full grown man. I have a feeling your the kid here since you have no actual facts to prove me wrong, sad...
iltusm176 1 year ago
@iltusm176
Well considering that just goes in from the top and exploits a weak point it doesn't show how much armour it can punch through. Not a feat of strength if you ask me. The RPG-29 however can punch through the hull of a Challenger 2(Thats a British tank just so you know). And please I'd love your address phone number and skype. And I don't know where I called you kid...
combatboots711 1 year ago
@combatboots711 you calledme kid multiple times
iltusm176 1 year ago
@iltusm176
I've commented twice to you. Neither times did I call you a kid.
combatboots711 1 year ago
@BigFuzzySperm Yes i can give you a variable source on that you ass hole, that is a well known fact. currently in the world it can destroy any known armored tank or vehicle in the world with ease. If you dont think what im saying is true see for yourself, look it up. and im not a lasy ass bastard who lays around playing video games all day. It's funny you bring up COD 4 because the realism of it is that your probably the one who plays cod 4. please stop trying to argue with facts. fuck off
iltusm176 1 year ago
@mentholman702 Haha yeah, scary but true
DannyG1533 1 year ago
The Javelin is a for sure killer if it hits its target. I don't think there's a tank that can stay acceptably operational after being hit by one. The truth with modern missiles, is, whatever it's designed to destroy, it almost all the time will. The only hope you have is destroying or diverting the weapon before it hits its target. The new Russian T-90s are boasted to have great capabilities of doing this and furthermore being able to take the damage better than any other tank.
sjg132 1 year ago
@sjg132 I think the US Military has to make a new tank. Unless the gunner gets a really lucky shot on a missile, new foreign weaponry can't really be stopped.
sjg132 1 year ago
holy shit is right haha
dgaftattoo1 1 year ago
Communist piece of garbage. Beautiful explosion in my book.
Mr1234patriot 1 year ago
Remember people this is a "battle ready" tank. Meaning it is loaded with all the ammunition, fuel, etc it would have in the field.
KingSalami19D 1 year ago
@KingSalami19D And I hear the T-72 was a death trap where hitting it on the top would ignite all the munitions, but still, I wouldn't want this Javelin to hit me...
aero3132 1 year ago
@aero3132 That is correct, more so with the bottom of the tank though. If the T72 rolled over even a small explosive device which was detonated below the turret the entire tank's magazine would ignite because it is located in the bottom of the turret housing.
KingSalami19D 1 year ago
@Shoppa360 do you even understand how this works. It's fire and forget. He didn't move cuz he wanted to see the tank go BOOM. In REAL war he could fire it from cover and after it's shot out he could move positions. Fire and forget.
unbindingfloyd 1 year ago
@unbindingfloyd I see i see.
Shoppa360 1 year ago
Imagine that backfiring...
LoLHumoRz 1 year ago
Terminator - v.AT
Mq7riX 1 year ago
Notice that the guy with the javelin was waiting until the missle hit the tank and then he moved...now in a real combat situation, will that a good weapon to use against people with Ak's and sniper rifles? just standing there while everyone is taking aim at your head?
Shoppa360 1 year ago
@Shoppa360 the javelin doesn't work like that. it is fire and forget. he was just watching the impact through the optics
KingSalami19D 1 year ago
wtf?? why it took so long to reach the tank? :))
themuslimism 1 year ago
javelin is an american development right?
ramb0nat0r 1 year ago
It has to long engagement time, the MBT-LAW is faster, lighter and easier, the only downside is that the MBT-LAW is slightly harder to use.
I've tried both in simulators.
SuperRegisteredUser 1 year ago
Ruskies are going to need a better insurance plan.
kewlaid31 1 year ago
$12000 per launcher and $1500 for one single missle...
I wouldnt recommend this on the Battlefield since it likely takes 5 mins to fire a round, not to mention its accurate or not, and infantry are pretty expose when using this expensive crap.
tungkid95 1 year ago
@tungkid95 lol...one missle 68.500 USD not 1500 $....look for informtaion before commenting a video...
oMaXxio 1 year ago
@tungkid95 you do know that they can target an enemy vehicle from behind cover to right? and its not crap as it hits its targets from above. were the armor is thinner ;)
Slotty 1 year ago
@tungkid95 it worth it when it takes out a million dollar tank.
lilbeezy4utoo 1 year ago
@tungkid95 Wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong, wrong. Well that's five things that are wrong in one comment. Good job.
Hritzness 1 year ago
haha shoot it off your shoulder
Xxsideshow22xX 1 year ago
I wonder what a javelin does to a M1 tank.
FMONREAL01 1 year ago
@FMONREAL01 i would bet exactly the same
oMaXxio 1 year ago
Ours Javelin slow in comparison with RPG 32 Hashim. Will suffice to say lies to itself.
MegaPagon 1 year ago
In soviet russia.. um.. Javelin destroys tanks.
Saport95 1 year ago
whats weird is that in mw2 u can get another javelin missle by picking up a small bag on the floor, plus the explosions are larger for some reason, AND u can run around with it like you have superhuman strength :S
lLuCiiFeRl 1 year ago
@lLuCiiFeRl same with a .50 cal sniper
Zincous707 1 year ago
its a shame that a Javelin missile costs 60 grand a pop, if we get the price down without sacrificing the amazing power that thing has I could see this easily becoming the main AT weapon for NATO forces
DBjorgo 1 year ago
@DBjorgo 80 grand.
Hatinonthehaters 1 year ago
@Hatinonthehaters I stand corrected
DBjorgo 1 year ago
The Soviet Union. Where leftover military equipment goes to terrorists, paramilitary groups, Western countries for shooting up, or all of the above.
Ultramarine646 1 year ago
Looks like anyone with a russian tank is screwed.
Metalgearmadness 1 year ago
0:24 вспышка в центре танка, а не возле боевой части ракеты. Сразу понятно что в танк заранее была заложена взрывчатка.
п.с. система ШТОРа отклоняет ракеты с инфракрасным наведением (с вероятностью 80%)
abrg100 1 year ago 19
@abrg100
"Что он ел? Салат? Салат не дает такого полета"
BrotherKomissar 1 year ago
@abrg100 wow im offended now (in the online Russia vs U.S.A battle over military supremacy) the Javelin hit it anyway ... why would they need to cheat?
superiguana1 1 year ago
@superiguana1 все просто - это рекламная акция)
abrg100 1 year ago
@superiguana1 some people just refuse to believe their tank can be destroyed I guess.. even though that weapon is designed only to kill tanks and kill any tank
OlderG0ds 11 months ago
@abrg100
"Негативный". С заложили взрывное взрывов идти не вниз. Если у вас медленное движение кадры источником взрыва четко приходит снаряда Javalin не посадили взрывчатых веществ. Даже если есть система для обнаружения дальним или тепла руководствоваться missles, большинство американских missles имеют системы построить в их борьбе акта или вспышек и радиоэлектронного подавления.
HeroOfTheAngels 7 months ago
@HeroOfTheAngels Пожалуйста, никогда не пользуйтесь google-переводчиком. Если хотите чтобы вас поняли - пишите на своем, родном языке.
abrg100 7 months ago
@abrg100
Ok. Wasn't too sure if you would understand or not.
HeroOfTheAngels 7 months ago
In Soviet Russia, Javelin own you.
mattman782 1 year ago 17
Here if shot from РПГ-32 with a cumulative shell then yes, there more explosion was))))))
Charodei100 1 year ago
The quite good thing))) Here only for that time while the rocket flies the tank of 500 times will have time to drive off... LOL XDXDXD))))
Charodei100 1 year ago 2
lol where's the tank after that?
llVIU 1 year ago
Javelin may destroy modern tanks like Abrams? This "T" old crap
MegaToolbar 1 year ago
This is a real video guys.I'v seen Javelin launches on reliable shows such as future weapons against tanks and they never survive a hit.Oh and spacemarine1999 do you know anything about war.This weapon is a AT a tank will never survive a Javelin missle.
killkillm101 1 year ago
the rocket looks so fake though xD
14Kristian41 1 year ago
@14Kristian41 your a fuckin retard, i work around these things all the time, thats exactly what it looks like, its not a damn rpg, its MEANT to DESTROY tanks not disable or put a dent in them, its the most powerful rocket launcher in the world
iltusm176 1 year ago
@iltusm176 I meant when the javelin shoots out, it looks like one of those fake credit card commercials or something. the rocket just looks animated. obviously I know that its real
14Kristian41 1 year ago
fake
gardenofarcane 1 year ago
Америкосы как всегда нахуячили в танк взрывчатки чтоб взрыв казался больше))
Jeisuli 1 year ago
@Jeisuli I dont know what your saying but im gona guess its something to do with the Javelin being shit and that the Kornet owns all.
TuAFFalcon 1 year ago
@TuAFFalcon it is fake.They put C4 in tank)
Jeisuli 1 year ago
@Jeisuli The missile isnt fake dude the explosion is. Javelins have nearly a perfect kill ratio. They just made it look fancy. You can tell also that they moved the sound of the explosion up with the explosion itself. Normally it would take around 3 seconds for the sound of the explosion to reach you. Also if a javelin punched thru where the ammo/fuel is kept you would have a similar explosion. Again it depends on the tank. You would never have such a explosion with a Abrams.
TuAFFalcon 1 year ago
they just saw 80,000 dollars blow up in there face
xXR3BLECIXXLEXx 1 year ago
danger close pro!!!!! just got my 500th kill with this! ;-)
ahamm94 1 year ago
omg....
EpicSmartAss 1 year ago
thats so fake,.
TheA11i 1 year ago
@TheA11i dude your retarded
lhslakewood90713 1 year ago
im no expert, but i think they got it
RenoGregory 1 year ago
wonder how many of those missiles failed to ignite its propellant, and just dropped to the ground. Wonder how much time operators had to run if that happened, if it would blow up on a timer, or impact, or just go dead after ignition failure.
joe735 1 year ago
@joe735 these weapons have to travel a distance before arming, so you dont need to run away if the main propellant fails to ignite. Even the far less advanced and unguided M72 has to travel atleast 11m before it arms, otherwise if it lands before that it wont arm and wont go off
jadger1871 1 year ago
that is a big fuck of missile
TheWeeklyLawReports 1 year ago
doesnt shoot that fast in MW2 :(
matthew3279 1 year ago
@matthew3279 one word.... Game
santasdeath 1 year ago
theres no way that was a real tank tanks have 2 inche thick or more armor all over.. that javalin coulndt make it into scrap like that with no turret anywhere....
if you look at the second explosion theres a purple flash at the tracks before the missle inpacts that flash is explosive cord detonating secondary explosives in the tank.... so its fake also the missles dont make flames like that gas was added.. explosions are black and have no if any flames... it was staged
IRONMAIDENFAN2006 1 year ago
this is not a real tank, the jabelin would kill the tank but it wont whipe it out like that.
cloudchaser07 1 year ago
all i can think of to say is pwnt.
pimppimpdoodlydoo 1 year ago
were the tank go :( lol
MrGSTARLIVE 1 year ago
And to think that the launcher is partly made out of polystyrene...:D
KnexGod03 1 year ago 2
lol get murked
MisterGooglyEyes 1 year ago
damnnn
theresatip 2 years ago
I think it's a T-80 look at the front of the turret
joaofga123 2 years ago
If the make tanks with effective cooling system so that their armor won't stick out in a heat vision these missles will become useless
Rofl890 2 years ago
its not heat vision, its visual
69lol69 2 years ago
no its heat vision, ive used a demonstration w/o ammo
speedy135789 2 years ago
Not Really, just use a Laser to trace the tank then.. The missle could still fly up and hit whatever target the Laser would be aiming at..
LordTakahashi 2 years ago
@Rofl890 Hardly useless, you can still direct fire, anyone with knowledge of basic math could make the missile useful.
sparks12001 2 years ago
80,000 dollar missile
Dudemag 2 years ago
2 million dollar tank
joaofga123 2 years ago
Non-working structural replica. Come on now... Don't throw claims until you have been there and done it.
rmmcpher 1 year ago
now 0 dollar tank
thinyourface 1 year ago
@thinyourface
yes :D
joaofga123 1 year ago
ye the missle cost 60k the tank cost millions but then its the army who cares about money they just want stuff to blow up or go faster...
saber1717 2 years ago
When you say a missile costs £60,000 a modern tank can cost sevral million so putting it into perspective its worth it.
SteveAlexRogerLewis 2 years ago
dude jabvelin is best at infantry weapon ever designed and the most expensive too
bleushift 2 years ago
Dumb fucks who are commenting read up before you speak
Fools
Inked4l 2 years ago
u know how old that tanks is? try blowing up the newest russian tank
rice0boy0 2 years ago
i would bet a million dollars it would still completely destroy the tank and kill everyone inside... i can't even think of anything besides the ground that the javelin and that missile in particular could not blow the fuk to smithereens.
1ShoT555 2 years ago 2
the newest russian tank, is still 30 years old....idiot
ChimpouT420 2 years ago 4
Comment removed
Firefox1201 2 years ago
dude ... no matter wicht tank .... even a leopard 2 would be destroyed ...... this missle is just TOO STRONG ...!
lucashansen 2 years ago
@lucashansen
TOOO stong is only TOPOL-M and his brothers... they bomb everything back to stoneage ^^
SibirianHusky 2 years ago
@SibirianHusky
Yeah we call that MAD. A topol gets a polaris which gets more topols which get more polaris and MM III's which get more topols and R-36's which will get more polaris and MM III's and b-52's, b-1 and b-2s coming from the north for you, Then everybody dies, including you, and nobody wins. idiot.
shaftster2001 2 years ago
@shaftster2001
i have no problem with death ???
YOU MAYBE ???
b1 b2 .... dont get close for a drop ... even your trash stealth didnt work lik3e it should.. and it its work.. it also no problem to dedect them....
SibirianHusky 2 years ago
it would be the same result
Firefox1201 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
a tank cant be killed like that a javlin wont it must not be a real tank
spacemarine1999 2 years ago
You do know that the Javelin is an AT (anti-tank) weapon, right? It was developed to destroy tanks "like that".
DutchCop 2 years ago 6
@DutchCop will a m1 abrams tank handhold that??
DZgoodTimes 1 year ago
@DZgoodTimes nah man, no tank will
FonNanudon 1 year ago
@DZgoodTimes
I really doubt it. Although the Abrams is a sturdy tank and has a perfect service history (not one has been damaged beyond repair during its thirty years of service), the Javelin system was specifically designed to obliterate armored vehicles, regardless of size and armor. And I'm sure that the weapons experts have not only used obsolete foreign equipment, but also US vehicles to test their new weapon on.
DutchCop 1 year ago
@DZgoodTimes The US Army tells us that the Javelin can destroy ANY tank on the battlefield. However they also tell us that the M1 Abrams can defend itself from ANY rocket attack. So I'm not sure how to answer that question lol
DannyG1533 1 year ago
@DZgoodTimes they are trying to make certain modifications to the tank so it can hold the javelin and shoot it in the tank
NoChocolateOnlyAzns 1 year ago
They cost $80,000 per missile. They can, and they do.
Kelberwitzi 2 years ago
And in the UK that is £60,000. They Cost £60,000 Per Missile to be shot. well each missle does cost that. heh alot of fecking money!
LogikzNG9 2 years ago
gotta be awesome to pull that trigger and be member of that expensive minute ^^
antiswattt2 2 years ago