Here, we're listening to an unusual vocal rendition by Paul. Still very pleasant and in key, but the performance is somewhat timid sounding. This take is also much faster than they normally played it.
Remember that these Decca sessions are funny for one single, somewhat obscure reason:
This session happened on January 1st of 1962... and the night preceding it was full of partying and drinking, as to ring in the new year. The Beatles were a bit dreary for this morning performance as a result.
Lol ok taking a high standard here but what a shitshow: uneven drums, george messes up the first solo, insane vibrato on paul (his amazing potential still shines through)
This is not a offical release from Apple .... the real Beatles songs on this collection can be found on the BBC recordings CDs. Till there was you must have been Tony Sheridan.. or someone else... thats not Pauls voice... his voice is more distinctive...even to this day.
amazing how you can say, this is paul, but he's so young !!!! pauly honey, your voice is still changing !!! awsome voice before and after becoming deep though...
Paul sounds like he's doing a bit of Fred Astaire. :) One of his favourites is Cheek to Cheek by Fred Astaire. They sound kinda similar in the tone. :) I like young Paul too. Soo sweet.
When the (Silver) Beatles played clubs and dance halls in Liverpool and Hamburg then needed to do some "ballads" so the couples could slow dance, They chose this and it became one of the crowd's favorites.
@drv001 cause early when they were touring with a bunch of bands the head guy said they needed a better name than the beatles so they came up with long john silver and the beetles, yes beetles, john was long john paul was paul ramon george was carl harrison and stuart was stuart de stael, eventually they stuck with the silver part in the name beatles
@rytullis Not Tony singing. Paul. I think the Silver Beatles were Lennon, McCartney, Harrison and Best. Possibly Stuart Sutcliff with them, not sure of the history to that extent. But I don't think so. Definitely Paul's voice here.
But, quite honestly, Pete's drumming here is just like a drum machine. His usual style only a little slower. No imaginative breaks or subtleties. Ringo was the missing musical ingredient.
George Martin apologized to Pete Best at Neil Aspinall's funeral stating" i didn't want you out of the band, i just didn't want you playing the session". He didn't let Ringo play on "Love Me Do" either. John Lennon said " we were our Best in Hamburg where the world never go to see us". Ringo was a great Beatles drummer....but Pete Best has his place in history. He is a Beatle...only one of 6 that can ever make that claim. He performed more gigs on drums with the Beales than anyone else.
oh this is the worst song of pete best as a beatle just lisent how he doesnt change teh tempo JUST LISTEN AND TELL ME IF AM GROWN then listen to the beatles version on the with the beATLES ALBUM YOU´LL SE THE DIFFERENCE
@georgedude77 not truetheyweremore pop with ringo however they wet´re aksked to playthis song by the newmanager
beatlesROCKED IN HAMBURG HOWEVER before epstein martin or ringo got involved pete Was best! as far as rock n roll was concerned classic rock n roll that is
Listen closely after 0:26 to the way he sings " I never soar them winging, I never soar them a-atall..." it's Paul as he sang it on Meet The Beatles. The producer hadn't gotten him to moderate his Liverpool dialect yet.
aqui es cuando se juntan por primera vez john lennon, paul McCartney y george crean la banda john silver & the beetles incluso no estaba ringo en esta banda. buen estilo con esas chaquetas de cuero jeje.
he surely wasn't on ringos level, ringo is one of the greatest drummers of all time, while best was average, would have better fitted in a band that never leaved hamburg.
i agree ringo is the better drummer but he isn't tarrible he's below average he's like a basic drummer with the same beat throught the entire songs hitting the snare every two beats
Pete Best was a less than average drummer, and might actually have held them back. What an excellent decision to hire Ringo instead. Made George Martin a lot happier too (after "Love Me Do," of course!)
with the beatles version better than that. paul's voice was good but when he said "music"...the look like "moosıkkkkk", you know. pete's drums was bad, ringo is really better than.
I haven't heard this in years. I have the bootleg album but my turntable broke before I could make a tape. This version is not as polished as the one we all know but it's still really lovely. Paul's voice sounds gorgeous. And I like the guitar break. Not as good as the intricate one George worked out, later, but interesting.
when were all these silver beatle songs recorded?
Ukuleleboy100 4 months ago
aww paulie!! he's soo young!!
barricade456 5 months ago
@xxTitanicRocksxx 19
meatloaf928 7 months ago
Pete can't even keep the beat at a steady pace
Lofgon 8 months ago
Here, we're listening to an unusual vocal rendition by Paul. Still very pleasant and in key, but the performance is somewhat timid sounding. This take is also much faster than they normally played it.
Remember that these Decca sessions are funny for one single, somewhat obscure reason:
This session happened on January 1st of 1962... and the night preceding it was full of partying and drinking, as to ring in the new year. The Beatles were a bit dreary for this morning performance as a result.
LikeWiseLikeYou 9 months ago 5
Compare Pete Best drumming to this song versus Ringo's drumming to this song....
vxenon67 10 months ago
@vxenon67 yeah, listen to his drumming in the solo and after
RylandoMusic 9 months ago
@vxenon67 lol ringo actually plays bongos on that song, anyways ringo was for surely a better drummer
angelsbeatlesfan 6 months ago
no havia escuchado esta version de esta cancion... adoro till therre was you
Stefidiaz 11 months ago
Who's singing? It sounds like Paul..
BornForSomething 11 months ago 2
@BornForSomething it is paul =)
Scaramouchemusic 10 months ago
Poor Pete....BUT ! He finally made millions when the Anthology recordings came out.
Only took 35 years ! ;-)
TacomaPaul 11 months ago
0:39 MuuusiiiCCCCC
Otakusca 1 year ago 3
Lol ok taking a high standard here but what a shitshow: uneven drums, george messes up the first solo, insane vibrato on paul (his amazing potential still shines through)
SuiChoy 1 year ago
This is not a offical release from Apple .... the real Beatles songs on this collection can be found on the BBC recordings CDs. Till there was you must have been Tony Sheridan.. or someone else... thats not Pauls voice... his voice is more distinctive...even to this day.
melh07302 1 year ago
This is not Paul...
melh07302 1 year ago
@melh07302 then who is it? It doesn't sound like John, that's for sure. Maybe it's Stu(lol) Better not get my hopes up....
albuorkka 1 year ago
@melh07302 It is Paul, he just wasnt as good at the vocals as he was later on, and plus he was younger.
CoIeStones 1 year ago
amazing how you can say, this is paul, but he's so young !!!! pauly honey, your voice is still changing !!! awsome voice before and after becoming deep though...
gili1484 1 year ago
angel voice, angel eyes, angel smile
OlgaMcCartney 1 year ago
Paul is definatly very young at this time! Ge sounds sooo cute!! XD
huntergruntetr123 1 year ago
Paul sounds like he's doing a bit of Fred Astaire. :) One of his favourites is Cheek to Cheek by Fred Astaire. They sound kinda similar in the tone. :) I like young Paul too. Soo sweet.
thebeatles102998 1 year ago
When the (Silver) Beatles played clubs and dance halls in Liverpool and Hamburg then needed to do some "ballads" so the couples could slow dance, They chose this and it became one of the crowd's favorites.
MegaObserver1 1 year ago
Голос Пола?Vois of Paul?
Bruno47602 1 year ago
well i cant see the diference between pete and ringo so please can somebody help me ?
niltonser 1 year ago
why is this call Silver beatles?
drv001 1 year ago
@drv001 cause early when they were touring with a bunch of bands the head guy said they needed a better name than the beatles so they came up with long john silver and the beetles, yes beetles, john was long john paul was paul ramon george was carl harrison and stuart was stuart de stael, eventually they stuck with the silver part in the name beatles
jias188 1 year ago
@drv001 these are gathered material that the beatles with pere best (no ringo) recorded and preformed in the cavren....
gili1484 1 year ago
Obviously not a cover band at all, no human could sound like this that wasn't Paul McCartney.
electrocuteanna 1 year ago
oh my goodness.
the vocals are so sweet
is it really Paul?
AllytheWalrus5391 1 year ago 4
@AllytheWalrus5391 I think it's Tony Sheridan singing. the beatles backed him for some time
rytullis 4 months ago
@rytullis Not Tony singing. Paul. I think the Silver Beatles were Lennon, McCartney, Harrison and Best. Possibly Stuart Sutcliff with them, not sure of the history to that extent. But I don't think so. Definitely Paul's voice here.
mickeyspinnaker 3 weeks ago
@kfoster009: Not, it was Paul in 1960
steintiebouma 1 year ago
Paul Mccartney in 1960
steintiebouma 1 year ago
Pete basicly plays the same beat all the time.
tenorismo 1 year ago
This is a cover band, folks....
kfoster009 1 year ago
who's sing?
beatlesjglv4evr 1 year ago
@beatlesjglv4evr The person singing is a very very young Paul McCartney... He sounds so sweeet....
KissMeQuk 1 year ago
GOOD GOD THEYRE SO YOUNG
Cidantis 1 year ago
But, quite honestly, Pete's drumming here is just like a drum machine. His usual style only a little slower. No imaginative breaks or subtleties. Ringo was the missing musical ingredient.
traegerico 1 year ago
they needed ringo .
michuvede 1 year ago
pete best was a disaster as a drummer... In this song you can see clearly why...
FANTOMASXXX69 1 year ago
This song is Awesome
sonicvsmario266 1 year ago
George Martin apologized to Pete Best at Neil Aspinall's funeral stating" i didn't want you out of the band, i just didn't want you playing the session". He didn't let Ringo play on "Love Me Do" either. John Lennon said " we were our Best in Hamburg where the world never go to see us". Ringo was a great Beatles drummer....but Pete Best has his place in history. He is a Beatle...only one of 6 that can ever make that claim. He performed more gigs on drums with the Beales than anyone else.
711147 2 years ago 2
This is definately Paul! I know Paul when I hear him...
melliemae 2 years ago 3
is that Pete Best singing? cuz it doesn't sound like John, Paul, or George
PARKER3688 2 years ago
@PARKER3688
It`s Paul
Chimbo65 1 year ago
oh this is the worst song of pete best as a beatle just lisent how he doesnt change teh tempo JUST LISTEN AND TELL ME IF AM GROWN then listen to the beatles version on the with the beATLES ALBUM YOU´LL SE THE DIFFERENCE
nolineintheorizon 2 years ago 2
Maby on this but in Like Dreamers Do he is good. And remember these boys had hangover after new year partying, it's documented.
timotastic 2 years ago
i love this!
lovingeveryxsecond 2 years ago 2
Ouch! Why is the drumming so poopy on this one?
stripeyhole 2 years ago
@stripeyhole i think the word ur lookin for is shitty. eveything else is good maybe its abit fast too
thatsnotagoat 2 years ago
Comment removed
georgedude77 2 years ago
and ringo wasnt there to play the drums so thats why it was so poopy
georgedude77 2 years ago
@georgedude77 not truetheyweremore pop with ringo however they wet´re aksked to playthis song by the newmanager
beatlesROCKED IN HAMBURG HOWEVER before epstein martin or ringo got involved pete Was best! as far as rock n roll was concerned classic rock n roll that is
janfreidun 1 year ago
Listen closely after 0:26 to the way he sings " I never soar them winging, I never soar them a-atall..." it's Paul as he sang it on Meet The Beatles. The producer hadn't gotten him to moderate his Liverpool dialect yet.
newporter42 2 years ago
That's clearly Paul McCartney.
stripeyhole 2 years ago 2
Pete Best doesn't suck, he's a good drummer if he sucked The Silver Beatles wouldn't of picked him, Ringo is just better.
DropkickMurphys12 2 years ago
Interesting theory................unfortunately it's just plain wrong.
04460 2 years ago
If its wrong, then why did it happen?
DropkickMurphys12 2 years ago
Pete Best was a very average drummer, the other Beatles especially John felt that he was holding them back. John really liked Ringo's drumming.
04460 2 years ago
Once A Beatle, Always A Beatle thats what i say
DropkickMurphys12 2 years ago
Sounds good to me.
04460 2 years ago
John said that Pete is a good drummer but Ringo is a good beatle... So how about that..?
timotastic 2 years ago 2
@DropkickMurphys12 but then y did they kick him out?
blackbeltbrown 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Paul sings too badly
metmet08 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
That's not Paul singing it's Tony Sheridan
Bellyflops2 2 years ago
No that's Paul
blutocampbell 2 years ago
For the record: Best was average at best, for a professional drummer.
ToolsnFire 2 years ago 2
he sounds almost like elvis in this one
williestratton 2 years ago
ringo plays thousand times better than pete best
daracenak 2 years ago
Hitler doesn't like music.
Alien8990 2 years ago
it is almost hard to even recognize pauls voice in this song
JohnStick22 2 years ago
i love you beatles although youve been gone for almost 40 years youve been a huge part of my life. i love you, plain and simple.
DayTripperLennon 2 years ago 3
who sings this one?
darioshow 2 years ago
Paulie.
OropherThranduil 2 years ago
Paul McCartney
zsacapala 2 years ago 3
The difference in Paul is because the drummer is off. Sorry but Pete misses a few beats
Who could carry a tune to that tempo.
Pete certainly wasn't the best (no Pun)
This is from someone who really sides with PBest.
Regards, JOJO
goodguys121796 2 years ago
Pete Best deserves some credit being a beatle
blutocampbell 2 years ago 6
well silver beatle lol
bigjoecampbell 2 years ago 2
Or both lol,they were known as the silver beatles when he joined,then they were the beatles .
blutocampbell 2 years ago
aqui es cuando se juntan por primera vez john lennon, paul McCartney y george crean la banda john silver & the beetles incluso no estaba ringo en esta banda. buen estilo con esas chaquetas de cuero jeje.
cristianvituperio 2 years ago 2
Pete Best was every good a drummer as Ringo; they were both excellent. Why he was offed I have no idea.
wibcam61 2 years ago
he surely wasn't on ringos level, ringo is one of the greatest drummers of all time, while best was average, would have better fitted in a band that never leaved hamburg.
OropherThranduil 2 years ago
i agree ringo is the better drummer but he isn't tarrible he's below average he's like a basic drummer with the same beat throught the entire songs hitting the snare every two beats
TheBeatlesfan1991 3 years ago
whose signing?
Guitar4Life2007 3 years ago
It's paul singing
KlurckColombus 3 years ago
why does paul sound so diffferent here than in 63?
Guitar4Life2007 3 years ago
Because he wasn't as good as a singer at the time. He got better.
ZomgRuler 3 years ago
they used to play for hours, so his voice must have faded after a while, plus he's not using it correctly
Lordlazythelast 2 years ago
the song is a halftone higher, that more difficult to sing.
Thrillhouse56 2 years ago
Paul McCartney
beatlesjglv4evr 2 years ago
Pete Best was a less than average drummer, and might actually have held them back. What an excellent decision to hire Ringo instead. Made George Martin a lot happier too (after "Love Me Do," of course!)
thelovelylinda 3 years ago
Sweet...
sgtband22 3 years ago 4
I think this is great! =D
num1Beatlesfan 3 years ago 2
He's just hitting the hi hat, but he cann't even do that right.
BMC500 3 years ago 4
Pete Blows! Ringo was clearly the right guy to replace pete.
TBROX 3 years ago 34
yes but that's pete best not blows =) oh is it a verb ?
krabou 3 years ago
@TBROX pete is beast when it comes to rock n roll songs
nightcrawler511 1 year ago
they used pete those fuckers..
karbyk62 3 years ago
YEAH I AGREE WITH U........
RichieDaggerSpadeS 3 years ago
sounds great.
kohut11 3 years ago 7
this is good stuff..
obviously the later versions are better quality, what with george's improved solo and ringo.
but this is sorta surfy..just a little.
PatRick4001 3 years ago 8
who sings?
darioshow 3 years ago 6
a very young paul.
LoooFeN 3 years ago 32
@LoooFeN Wow, really? I'm starting to see the resemblance, very young
charliemagoo 1 year ago
george does a better solo
babyshoe1 3 years ago
Oops, Pete keeps speeding up. No fills or ride. Ouch!
dlawrick 3 years ago 5
pete's drumming sounds like a damn midi metronome
scarfacehel9 4 years ago 5
That's probably the reason why George Martin told Brian to kick him out of the band...
yelserpsivle 3 years ago 11
suena mucho mejor con paul
chitoponmx 4 years ago
ese es paul
scarfacehel9 4 years ago
WOW listen to this now go listen to something paul did recently... his voice changed a lot
YellowSub33 4 years ago
Wow Pete kind of blew
beatlesimprov 4 years ago 2
with the beatles version better than that. paul's voice was good but when he said "music"...the look like "moosıkkkkk", you know. pete's drums was bad, ringo is really better than.
gofretler0vadisi 4 years ago 3
Ringo and Pete were great drummers when they beatles.
blutocampbell 4 years ago
pete's drumming sucks
ferskasito 4 years ago
ditto
BMC500 4 years ago
This version is from january 1962, so they were THE BEATLES already.
The "Silver Beatles" was the name of the band only during a short period before the first visit to Hamburg(1960).
Anyway, thank you very much for posting this version.
JaimeChile 4 years ago
paul mcartney and john lennon r too good artists in d beatles..
dayiboy 4 years ago
I haven't heard this in years. I have the bootleg album but my turntable broke before I could make a tape. This version is not as polished as the one we all know but it's still really lovely. Paul's voice sounds gorgeous. And I like the guitar break. Not as good as the intricate one George worked out, later, but interesting.
iluvjpm 4 years ago
I agree =)
jitterbug121 4 years ago
i prefer the later version, but this is still a great song.
I'm so glad the Beatles got popular, or else none of us would be listening to this
LCplDwayneHicks 4 years ago 2
I also disagree I prefer the second version but I like this one too it's interesting to know it
andilovetheBeatles 4 years ago 2
The Beatles are the greatest
blutocampbell 4 years ago
love this song
tartwivaheart 4 years ago
I disagree.
DAGPGPH 4 years ago
good to know the beginings of the beatles,this version is better even that the one that was sung years after by the beatles
55102 4 years ago