Added: 4 years ago
From: PearsonSweden
Views: 186,845
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (117)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • BORE-onia...? = Obviously that's Washington DC with a capital 'BORE' sucker...?

    Drag-onia...? = Itty-bitty part of Dixie wot never surrendered to the Union...?

  • Ha ha ha ha,You Just tell them the secret,What if they use a cyber attack,to disable any line of defense,If you know of them and their strategy, then they know yours to,this is not war about Technology,this war is about to predict enemy intentions,before they predict yours.

  • the use of robots creeps me the fuck out.

  • Ill take 4000 units and 200,000 rounds.

  • bofors makes some of the greatest stuff on earth (for killing)

  • Another Muniton of SMART-Bombs ;)

  • "Render Inoperable"

    A beautiful euphemism for "Fry that motherfucker to the gunnery sight"

  • what if the rebel is me, and this shit is in the hands of fascists...

  • It's fucking stupid adversiting joke

  • thanks for sharing

  • If it was me in outpost 7 i would get the hell outta there about a month before the rebels hit

  • this days you can call rebel any enemy. BTW THE LAST PLACE I WANT TO BE WHEN THE REBELS ATTACKS IS OUTPOST 7

  • 0:50

    The question is: Will it blend?

  • What a gay future.

  • I never did trust those damned sneaky Gordonians!

  • what if the rebels use an electromagnetic pulse?

  • @umar699 Then you nuke the shit out of the entire region. ;)

  • @umar699 if you listened to the presentation, the rebels have to get in the perimeter to disable anything. Also a lot of the major defense systems are redundant. Even if they launched something from a distance, that's exactly what these systems are built for. So yeah, sounds kind of simple just "use an electromagnetic pulse".. good luck getting it there though

  • Lucky it wasn't me in outpost 7.

    I would've been out of that DFP before the film even started rolling.

  • HOW SWEET!

    IT ALMOST MADE ME CRY SO HAPPY WAS I IN THE END!...

    It lacked only Santa Claus with bells ringing and the name "BOFORS" upon its sleigh!

  • PAKISTAN DEVOLOPED H-10 (Precision Guided Munitions BOMB)

    THEY ARE TERRORIST !

  • WTF ? a REBELS ? Is that a banks going against robbed pist off people ( rebels ) ?

  • @resistance0311

    They are getting ready. Camps for "unhappy" of the regim are beeing build as we speak and american people are still like: USA is the best ! ...well - there is no USA anymore - there is North American Union but who cares about lost independance

  • 6000 G´s? Thats like my pelvis thrust.

  • I would just hack their network. And go to war the old fashioned way

  • Ahahaha/ stupid pendoses technology )))))

    Russian military truck no have electronics!!!!

    ...and one rocket with radio-electronic warhead do destore you defence system PS: sorry for my bad speak english

  • @TheDirexe if it uses electricity it is effected by EMP, doesn't matter if it doesn't have lcds it still has cables batteries etc...

  • Comment removed

  • '

    what is the name of enemy country coming to this video

  • @freemanbrook 43 millions Americans are too lazy to find a job? As if they really enjoyed themselves to enter into decadence? This is not by spending even more in military hardware that the US economy is going to restart. China spent 2.0 % of its GNP on military, USA is spending 6% and rising. Look at the at the economy growth of both country. Don’t you see the problem? USA needs to cut defense spending and build infrastructure, not thinking on how to best destroy its enemy with gadgets.

  • Suppose you don't pay your electic bill!!

  • @HITMANxFTW and because propaganda made you gay with your subconsciousness, you are subliminally targeted by homosexual military party.

  • @HITMANxFTW swedish-gay nato training movie

  • Bofors Defence should invent an automated system to restart the economy of USA. Destruction is so simple, why construction is so hard? Especially for the 43 millions Americans on food stamps.

  • @brickandfanal

    That's rich coming from someone living in a province that's essentially a welfare bum living off our taxes.

  • @XKS99 Good to hear your constructive comment; I was on the belief that people from Ontario didn’t have the brain to do any critical thinking. On second thought, I see no relation between my initial comment and your, nor the video, so I might be right on Ontarian after all.

    Sure, your province is wealthy. But I dwarf 99% of the population of your province on culture, history, politic or sciences knowledge. Most importantly, I can use my knowledge for critical thinking.

  • i love bofors : )

  • Wow.. we dont need the humans anymore!!

  • Gorgonian Bastards!

  • Russians are using guided anti-tank ammunition on mini-parachutes from 1980-s :)

  • and where does the shrapnal land?

  • @robinbob56 On any rebel that doesn't move of course.

  • Technology of aggression will always lead technology for defense.

  • nice proof by animation!

  • lol... highly sophisticated missile defense systems like that probably won't be desgned around 2022... unless there is another world war. that generally speeds advances in millitary technology up.

  • thanks to technologies like this the USA can finality surround and destroy Russia then the rest of the world.. well i hope not

  • @Zaharkl It's not a US technology u dumbassQ

  • @carllundstrom dumbassQ? did i say it was? i said thanks to technologies like this the USA can... didnt say thanks to usa for making this technology.. dumbass

  • @Zaharkl usa suck Russian dick in all ways

  • @DisgorgeKILLusa3 oooh internet tough guy haha. You can hate the US all you want, I would too if I was second best.. hell russia isn't even second anymore! Haters are going to hate :)

  • @Cartmanland98 bla-bla-bla-bla. I agree boy Russia isnt second< Russia is first. Of course you may go anal love your fat failed country lol.

  • Stupid rednecks

  • nice one!!!!

  • We need this tech to defend ourselves against all the niggers

  • That first artillery shell that kills the tanks is already in operation today, it's called SADARM.

  • @soundslave and so is the missile defense but I don't think Bofors bought it.. yet.

  • @soundslave or SMArt

  • well this defense systems are real.... but they do need some time to mature and be perfected... so maybe in 2022 we'll be expecting this

  • "Forced to negotiate." lol

  • its really like C&C

  • good idea!!

  • Those launchers better be mobile. On the ground any sandnigger could blow them up.

  • What a giant load of bullshit to sell deadly weapons to the public.

  • @pspkiller1234xx well our technology is already almost to this probably but either in a prototype or is distibuted and used on a "need to know" basis

  • ok this is nice but do people actually think all this technology will be available by 2022???

  • Надо домой,такую херь взять)

  • lol i love the hugely neutral aspect that bofors takes, they are an arms manufacturer. i love (if it actually exists the).... well all that stuff.

  • Having just read "Wired for war", there is some truth to it, but all it will do is just change the way warfare is done and not prevent it.

  • thoes fucking gorgoinians!!!!!

  • Watch out for Gorgonia! Help me, Baby Jesus, the Gorgonians are coming...

  • any decent new cruise missle is almost impossible to intercept because of hypersonic speed and random trajectory changes

  • Cruise missiles aren't hypersonic you retard. They're not even supersonic. Much like your thought processes.

  • @rob583 maybe you should do a little research before talking shit. Look up kh-90 tested 20 years ago, speed of mach 5 with 4000 km range at altitude of 20+ km designed for tu160. Some other examples are meteorit-a and brahmos. And what does my thought process have to do with cruise missile speed?

  • The KH-90 never got out of devevlopment. Neither did the Koala/Meteorit-a. The Brahmos is the only supersonic one in the field, and only India has them so they're not a threat even considered by the West. It does a measly Mach 2.5 which is easily intercepted by PATRIOT, a phalanx, rolling airframe or even air to air missiles

    So yes, if you want to fight phantom missiles that don't exist you'd be right. But in the real world you're still a moron who doesn't know what the fuck he's talking about.

  • @rob583

    I mentioned them because they were flight tested. You claim that cruise missiles aren't supersonic then suddenly agree the brahmos is supersonic? You want deployed examples, sure, p-270, p-500, p-700, p-800 all supersonic and those are just russian designs.

    And thanks for the laugh, Id love to see a patriot (not even mentioning the fantasy plane and ata missile) that is going to intercept a surface skimming mach 2.5+ missile.

    Btw put some coherent thought into your next response.

  • What do you do for a living? I actually operate Patriot missile systems, and we're pretty well trained and well versed on the threats that are out there. Supersonic cruise missiles are not very prevalent because they have a substantially reduced range compared to subsonic, jet powered cruise missiles.

    PATRIOT can very, very easily engage cruise missiles. Speed doesn't even matter, the only thing that does is putting the missile at the right place at the right time. It scans from the surface up.

  • You're quoting anti-ship missiles? The only reason they're supersonic is to increase the chance of a kill. They're easily defeated by US ships. PATRIOT would never engage those because it's on land.

    You originally claimed there were hypersonic cruise missiles. There aren't. Anti ship cruise missiles fall into a completely different category for obvious reasons.

    You're a fucking retard, and you don't know what you're talking about.Go run back to wikipedia and find some more garbage to spit up.

  • Zing!! nice one.

  • network centric warfare is not something new

  • LOL this video is ancient history, as obsolete as the military itself!

  • thetotalvidwatcher :

    Please enlighten us with your knowledge.

    You do know most of the munitions in this video already exist and was developed by a Swedish arms manufacturer.

    Your own Excalibur weapons systems was built in part by using Swedish technology.

    You shouldn't talk when you know nothing.

    This little video is just a future scenario and it is built on current technology.

    Check out proper real live video of the BONUS shell.

    How about the fastest deployed artillery in the world.

  • The artillery is called Archer, search for it.

    How about programmable 40mm munitions.

    Lets not forget that USA bought a shitload of the AT-4 anti-tank weapon from Sweden.

    You would think USA would be able to build their own, right, so why chose ours.

  • I was joking, the reason I said it was ancient history was because the video looked really old, not because the technology was obsolete. And I said that it was as "obsolete as the military itself" becuase, now more than ever, the military is slowly becoming less important as gurrila warfare and diplomacy replace lines of infantry, tanks and artillery. But in all due respect, did you think I was actually being serious?!? Also, no hard feelings against Sweden, if that is what you thought.

  • OK.

    I thought you were dissing Sweden or something.

    I agree the graphics in this video is quite deplorable, so it must be quite old.

    It's all good :-)

  • I'm calling you bullshit. the Bonus system is already operational. take a look at watch?v=WLqjoyEkE8Q and tell me that it doesn't work

  • Dramatic animation and narration, versatile but simple technology.

  • this reminds me of the first C&C cinematic videos between maps :)

  • Bofors is the shit!

    Guess what weapon killed some of Sadams cusins.. think "gustav"

  • remember that there will be hardly any more fosil fuels which means the battlefield will be different .

  • yeah - no more coal to throw at the enemy. :(

  • I think its a watse to blow them up.

  • well, how the technology is looking in the future it looks good, bu i don't think in 2022

    it it already possible...but maybe i am wrong

  • You never know. Sometimes they'll tell you that it won't be possible for the next decade, but in fact, they already have them all worked out.

  • yeah true...you never know what they do in Area 51 :P

  • holy shit, when is the movie going to be out?

  • I love the EMP Idea but a metal cage will stop it

  • That's just how things go in weapons technology. Someone develops a better rock thrower, someone develops a better shield, then someone develops a rock to go through that shield, and it goes on and on.

  • Wavelengths.

  • • Though metal cages is quite heavy, dont you think? :d

    • Modern anti-EMP principles are:

    1) Metal dense grid - old. B2 for example

    2) The object has composite insulator layer - eurocopter tiger, jas39gripen

    3) The object has extremely conductive layer on its body, electricity is conducted and send to air - also eurocopter tiger. (has both layers.)

  • gorgonia. get redy to get pooned by swedish tech!!, we should honestly stop selling our tech to other countrys and keep it NORDIC

    gorginan evil fuckers .)

  • Swedish tech is the best!

  • swweeeeeeeeeett

  • Pretty sweet video, makes you wonder what warfare will be like in a century or so.

  • It will be like in the movie, a bunch of cloned Kurt Russell's called Todd.

  • danm rebels

  • Nice video

  • Kriegsprofiteure rausschmeißen wäre effektiver und billiger. Die Völker sind alle nicht an Kierg interessiert und müssen endlich selber sprechen.

  • Propaganda :D niiiiice.. Swedish tech allways good!

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more