I think that the moon is manmade!!! By GIANTS!!! THE MOON USED TO HAVE GIANTS IN IT AND THE BODIES OF THE GIANTS ARE STILL TRAPPED IN THE MOON!!! I HAVE PROOF OF THIS BTW!!! I JUST MANAGED TO CAPTURE IT ON FILM AND YOU CAN DO THE SAME!!! Use your iPhone on the enlarge images of the moon!!!
What a stupid video. The spacecraft that took those images was ancient and actually developed its photos on board the orbiter in its own pressurized container. The images were then sent back to Earth as TV broadcasts. When you consider this, the imperfections in the photography are impressive for being so minimal. So no, it's not aliens. Wish it were, though.
I was looking at google moon and i found a huge alien face in the dirt...im pretty sure google put it there as a goof but its deffinitly agrey aliens face and head..its pretty cool actually
most of these markings looks like fingerprints or watermarks or film deterioration on the negatives...If I was an alien being I would not make the moon my base of choice...why?...look at it...it is a meteor magnet...even the astronauts were leary about staying too long
Wondering what this is? No, it's not an alien colony. It is a processing artifact in this image of the Moon, which was taken by one of the Lunar Orbiter satellites in the mid-1960s.
You can learn more about these artifacts, and the work currently underway to digitally scan all the old Lunar Orbiter imagery, from the U.S. Geological Survey.
Aliens are ancient people from India that left the earth, due to nuclear war and natural disaster, over 20,000 years ago in vimanas and settled in subterranean worlds of mars and our moon. They are far advanced technologically & spiritually and dont want to resettled on earth thats on a destructive path. They are monitoring earth activities. Its well documented in the Vedas.All major governments knows this. The US & England are long studying the text and trying to build similar crafts
If anyone seriously thinks that those are real then you are truly in need of help. Google always throws in a couple Easter eggs. They did in Google Earth a lot. Also, we didn't go back to the moon cuz pf budget cuts, not aliens. After the last shuttle is launched, NASA is planning on landing on an asteroid. Why would we want to land on an asteroid? Well cuz if you think about it. We can use it as a cheaper, alternative means of travel when going long distance in space (like to mars).
@TehSkalias They are. Why do you think we stopped the Space Shuttle program? By 2025 NASA plans on landing on an asteroid, then they said by like 2025 - 2035 they plan on landing on Mars.
@MrTeejaysingh i think it's koyanisqaatsi or something. its from an 80's movie. if that isn't the song just check the rest of the links it'll be in there.
I like watching this kind of vids before going to sleep, this helps me to make funny dreams and that's remind me childhood. But actually I'm getting more and more disappointed ,' cause so many of these vids are crap & absolutely not convincing
Last time, I saw a slideshow of rainbow and/or sun photos, supposed to be the sky before haarp-induced earthquakes in various parts of the world
btw, reptilians sneak inside your home to steal your sock in your washing machine, this is how they survive
@davidenespana are you saying these photos are done in an "old style photographic processing" way?i would think they are digital pictures but what do i know.
@MrGodssonsatan Yup. Most photographs of the moon pre-date digital photography. The originals are most likely transparencies somewhere in a filing cabinet at NASA. Of course they've since been scanned - but all the original analogue defects would have been transferred as well.
@Zoroasterrrr I'll have a copy of that book once you're done. Sounds awesome! lol Yeah, I get your point. There's so much weird shit on youtube that it's like a forum for the insane to think of crazy shit and post it in an attempt to get idiots to believe it. Some will say you're crazy for believing it, others for not believing it. Ridiculous!
alright everybody. we are use to this. its just alien grafiti. lol jk. but this is very intersting. iam always intrested in ufos. sense ive seen so many
those must be really secret, even nasa has not been yet covered them, oh and by the way, those "stains" are a liquid spills in the development of the film thats about how secret it gets, maybe nasa is trying to hide their bloopers....
fuck you people im going to my secret underground lair beneath Los Alomos, and the Denver airport and right a book about contrails, the locness monster, bigfoot, swampgas, solar flares, 2012, alien gray's, laserbeams, NASA, The Vector Logo, antigravity, rail guns in low earth orbit, the 4th dimension, tetrahedral mathmatics,.19.5 degrees North or South, The Cydonia Mars anomalys, the moon hoax, santa claus, the tooth fairy, easter bunny, ufo sightings, and giant lizards that fly in the sky.
Apollo 13 after they came from behind the dark side of the moon, goes something like this "Just wanted to inform you, that there is a Santa..." Many folks believe that was another way of saying that aliens are real and they are on our moon...
@Ur2ez4me81 ........one problem here apollo 13 was shot in a studio on earth, it was faked...the seven missions was entirely shot in a studio...it was a hollywood trickery...they used FRONT SCREEN PROJECTION perfected by stanley Kubrick in his 2001 space odessey....stanley kubrick faked the moon landing
@robertk131 what about the moon rocks they brought back, weren't they verified "officially?" Who really knows but I have heard about that theory as well...lol
@Ur2ez4me81 ahahahahahahahah i suggest you to see this : Moon Landing Hoax : Disney Made Apollo Rocks with Dogs & Cartoon Characters Hidden in Them......it's all fake the space shuttle, apollo, gemini, mercury...again suggestion : International Space Station Hoax : Air Bubbles Rise- Space Walks Simulated in A Massive Water Pool
@robertk131 lol, haha hold up are you saying the space staion is a hoax? I dunno about that one I've seen that a few times with binoculars...The moon landings maybe but not the space station...Thats like saying satalites aren't real...
@Ur2ez4me81 none of the five stations never existed...not even one astronauts(in fact they're only actors playing a disney film)never ever walked in space...(1)Saliout, (3)Skylab ,(5)apollo-soyouz,(6) MIR, (10) ISS...MIR was only a miniature model...ISS :all the spacewalks are filmed in Johnson space centre inside a gigentic pool with at the bottom a rotating plastic earth a spaceshuttle and the full station...check it out
@Ur2ez4me81 none of the five stations never existed...not even one astronauts(in fact they're only actors playing a disney film)never ever walked in space...(1)Saliout, (3)Skylab ,(5)apollo-soyouz,(6) MIR, (10) ISS...MIR was only a miniature model...ISS :all the spacewalks are filmed in Johnson space centre inside a gigentic pool with at the bottom a rotating plastic earth a spaceshuttle and the full station...check it out
@robertk131 id like to see soem proff, not some random dudes opinions, seems like they have more proof than you... id go with them in court in saying that they went to the moon
@robertk131 id like to see soem proff, not some random dudes opinions, seems like they have more proof than you... id go with them in court in saying that they went to the moon, should go back to 4chan
@MrBeastnare what do you mean the moon is not ours? When I made that statement I was referring to the moon that is visible in our skies & the same old "rock" which has gravitational effects on our planet. Wait, are you talking to me I'm confused?
@Ur2ez4me81 Several of the astronauts who flew to the moon during the Apollo Missions (24 men have flown to the moon) have become adament that aliens exist after leaving NASA.... Who knows? Most of the Apollo Alien claims have been debunked though.
Superb video. I have confirmed most of these anomalies on google moon myself. Astounding evidence of bases and craft flying at high altitudes, you can clearly see the shadowing from the overhead craft. These are not blotches on the film. There is a reason we never returned to the moon. In Neil Armstrong's words "We were warned off the moon" Unfortunately he did'nt elaborate further, now I can see why. The thoughts of alien beings right on our doorstep observing our every move would cause panic.
When you click that questionmark, it says: "Wondering what this is? No, it's not an alien colony. It is a processing artifact in this image of the Moon, which was taken by one of the Lunar Orbiter satellites in the mid-1960s."
NASA removes objects they do not want you to see such as building structures on the moon.NASA doesn't even take the time to fill in the blurs, blotches or black spots as if they somehow want people to know they removed something,but this is what a NASA employee said,it's just common place to remove any sign of intelligent life on other planets.Such admission could cause total chaos amongst religions. It's better that people remain ignorant so churches can make money & control their congregations
My Suggestion would be to stop messin with that 2D crap and get you Google Earth 4.2 or something. Then you will really start having some fun!!! I myself am Addicted to the Sky Map.......Hours and hours of roaming the universe fing strange looking stuff at every turn.
Wondering what this is? No, it's not an alien colony. It is a processing artifact in this image of the Moon, which was taken by one of the Lunar Orbiter satellites in the mid-1960s. ;)
I DON'T SEE FAKE. THEY JUST NEED A GOOD UP DATE! HAVE A LOOK TO THE NEW JAPANESE 2009 MISSION PICTURES... BETTER AND BETTER... BUT STILL DIFFICULT TO SEE WITH A NAKED EYE THE LEM PARKED WHERE THEY LEFT IT... THEY PROMISED THAT SHORTLY WE COULD ENJOY FULL DETAILS OF ALL APOLLO MISSIONS.
NASA isn't going to let you see whats on the moon period, well not yet anyway. As for the question did we really land on the moon or was the footage fake, the answer is yes to both scenarios. The live audio feed from that mission has 11mins missing of a description of structures and such, try finding that if you can, bet you can't but too many people who heard it remember. Hence the fake footage to cover it up. The structures on the moon imo were built by the chinese, this is in their history.
Fantastic! I'd love to know the coordinates.......
Google is right about using 60's vintage Lunar Orbiter imagery. It's the best we have (at least to the general public). A recent re-discovery of the of original data tapes has got NASA busy digitizing them with stunning results. NASA plans to make all data sets free to the public.
Fantastic! I'd love to know the coordinates.......
Google is right about using 60's vintage Lunar Orbiter imagery. It's the best we have (at least to the general public). A recent re-discovery of the of original data tapes has got NASA busy digitizing them with stunning results. NASA plans to make all data sets free to the public.
am i the only one who thinks google moon is fake like seriosly they still dont know everything do you really think there gonna let us just look so if somthing happens we can just see it? I dont think so. and also idek if we ever landed on the moon and some theorys say there are aliens on the moon but we dont know so i think google moon is fake.
Ya'know if there is life out there they are not keeping up with our technology because we keep seeing them and they ethier do'nt care or do'nt know yet,they must think that people are very stupid not to talk' no longer can the so called aliens depend on the witness being dismissed as a kook or the town drunk our tech.is catching them it will not be long before someone,somehow gets proof and show's it to the media and puts it on display.
@xprtnegotiator According to Google the images of the moon are from film that was taken by the lunar orbiters in the 60's. The images are not satellite imaging because NASA claims that the old photo's are the clearest images we can get so far...
The moon has mascons, or counterweights. So, if something big hits it it will right itself like Bozo. Moon was made by ancient universe architects. Or, it is a spaceship.
Saying what the moon is a 'proving' it are 2 different tings.
this ridiculous why is googe earth pictures so clear and up close ,you can zoom in on a dime when the satalite is so far in space but google moon you cant zoom up to anything.stop wasting our time
Wondering what this is? No, it's not an alien colony. It is a processing artifact in this image of the Moon, which was taken by one of the Lunar Orbiter satellites in the mid-1960s.
The Lunar Orbiter camera system was a marvel of engineering for its time. Built long before the advent of digital sensors, the Lunar Orbiter camera captured images on black and white film that was developed on the spacecraft and then scanned with an electron gun ...
@TheMrLusk Surprisingly, the Lunar Orbiter images are still the best images available of much of the Moon, and this is one of many reasons why NASA and other space agencies are sending a new generation of satellites to the Moon over the next few years.
You can learn more about these artifacts, and the work currently underway to digitally scan all the old Lunar Orbiter imagery, from the U.S. Geological Survey.
dude the apollo 11 one. i am in the exact place you are but that thing isnt there and the area around the apollo 11 is completely blurred out where that thing is supposed to be. send me coordinates of everything so i can double check AGAIN. v.v
google moon isn't going to show you anything the moderators don't want you to see. the seafloor just off the coast of texas where thousands of miles of pipelines have been laid on the seafloor is a perfect example. on google earth it's just one big blurred out grey. more manipulation by the man.
I am a photographer and i work with film and chemical development. I am sure such imperfections cannot occur!! So most probably aliens are there already.
I know I should not be but it still amazes me how ignorant people can be here on YouTube. They have no answers except to say its fake and throw in a vulgar insult. And most are probably writing from their parents' basement. If I were alien I would stay far away too, eventually if there are enough of those people we will wipe ourselves out and they can have a planet without lifting a finger.
i believe there is space creatures as in animals that able to survive in space and some cant be seen with our naked eyes there more colours than just our spectrum.
dumb fucks its a fucking glich, thats what u get for being a fat virgin, now go get laid at your fucking gay space nerd convention, u mean i only watched this shit cause im german
why is everyone so stupid, google is only a search engine, they have all US Goverment support must be for a reason, stop using google products or products with google stocks in them.
Switch to a private and encrypted search engine like IXQUICK,com or DUKGO.com
like some people have already mentioned its when they developed the film back in the 60's with a series of chemical processes and imperfections may of got in there distorting the images. the distortions are on top of the image not a part of the image thats clearly seen they dont follow any contours of craters or the lunar surface. one way to check is grab yaself a expensive telescope and have a look yourself.... hope people are not too dissapointed
@21Essexlad Yep, I agree, Looks like a smudge to me but good observation though. I like the music, I used it to watch the Face of Mars geometry analysis.
@21Essexlad I also looked at this in Google Earth and switched to moon view. I looked in the same place and the anomalies are not there. So how do you explain the discrepancy between Google Earth and Google Moon?
I have processed a lot of film in my day and had goofs of mis-loading the reels. I never had blotches like this.
@analogpix1 becoz the newer version of google earth as been updated to counter these blotches by satellite images taken digitally not reels like these use to use in the 60's. Also the method of transferring the images back to earth was using alot of chemical processes and electron gun usage. "go to google moon and click on the question marks. they expain"
The reason why you didnt have blotches like this is maybe your images were not being beamed from space as a tv signal like these were??
@21Essexlad dear friend i am using a telescope and a darn expensive and sensitive one but the amount of zoom a satelite lens can achieve is unreachable.
So thats not a solution.
On top of that the photos that were published back then in the press are different from the ones NASA released in their website when it 1st opened and they still insist they are the same.
Do some extended research from different sources.You will be amazed by the ''holes in the script''
@omsigbug with respect i cannot see every bit of research known to man, the originals look the same to me. but the images that we can see on the vid, are "clearly" not settlements. its clearly a overlay you must see this? it doesnt repectively follow any contours of the lunar surface or crators? The comment about grabbing yaself a telescope was not meant to be taken literally my friend :) i was merely saying the only way your gonna see it is by looking yourself, attend a observatory and see
@21Essexlad that's what it says when you click on the question mark. Google out that on there. Do you really believe that Google is telling you the truth and that they're not contributing to the cover-up?
@chubacaman1 I am a sceptic in most things but you have to just take a look at the images themselves.... like on my old post, you can see its a overlay and not part of the image... also, all the cover up stories etc whats there to gain from it?? if there is intelligent life like us, why cover it up? doesnt make sense.
@21Essexlad Have you heard of the Illuminati? Maybe they could be involved. And they might ave the cover ups because they might know something we don't. It's impossible to tell, unless we go straight up to NASA and take all their shit.
@21Essexlad yeah, back when people developed film. its 2011 and now we have satellites orbiting the moon with telescopic digital cameras, such as the LRO, which dont need to develop film. how would they get it back here anyway? thats a lot of postage.
@orange12089 how would they get what back here? the images? it was beamed using the same signals as what the conventional TV's use/used. when the data was collected and transferred to a viable image distortions and imperfections were suseptable to arise.
I am aware of the current digital technology in how we gain images now. but the images that were used here were before digital sattelite signals were used to gain more images that was used in the current updates on google earth/moon.
@21Essexlad ...i was being sarcastic, hence the joke about paying for postage to ship 1960's dated pictures back from the LRO, which only reached the moon in April, 2010 by the way, its a rather new satellite.
Oh yeah, The LROC (The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera) comprises a pair of narrow-angle cameras (NAC) and a single wide-angle camera (WAC). LROC will fly several times over the historic Apollo lunar landing sites at 31 miles (50 km) altitude; with the camera's high resolution, the lunar rovers and Lunar Module descent stages and their respective shadows will be clearly visible, along with other equipment previously left on the Moon.
The mission will return approximately 70–100 Terabytes of image data, too much to ever be sent in an analog format such as you are suggesting. The images are captured with a photocell that transfer the data into raw binary information which is then sent back to earth using conventional radio waves, received and transferred back into an image.
Oh yeah, The Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND) will also provide measurements, create maps, detect possible near-surface water ice deposits using the ultraviolet light from stars and the interplanetary medium to peer into permanently shadowed craters in search of water ice.
@orange12089 all that sounds awfully deserved of a medal and if i could id give you one myself for reeling somethings off the net i would lol, but whats that got to do with the images we see here??? considering that the title suggests that these are from google moon "2008" which does not co-inside with the LRO mission of 2009, its kind of rendered that null and void and not relating to this topic. the images they used for around the areas which are shown in this vid are the originals
@21Essexlad@21Essexlad who said they were not original photos? We are not discussing the authenticity of the photos, but rather their mode of development. Try to stay on topic. Now that you understand that, understand this. they werent chemically developed in a satellite in the vacuum of space. developing photos requires several types of chemical changes, most involving converting silver ions into silver metal using developer, but im sure you already knew that.
@21Essexlad It also involves things such as silver-halide crystals which are removed in the fixing bath. The fixer dissolves only silver-halide crystals, leaving the silver metal behind to swell to create the negative. ah, but one last problem, now the negative is covered in detached, partially dissolved silver-halide crystals which can be easily washed off with liquid water producing a clean, crystal free negative! easy!
so, the images we see here are certainly not from the "chemically developed" era but most certainly from the digital era. You, or anyone else for that matter, probably could have deduced this themselves if you had just looked up the launch date for the LRO (18 June 2009 21:32:00 UTC)
@orange12089 Originals being from the Lunar and Plantary Institute and many other sources. The sources they used in this google moon app can be seen on the "about google moon" when you first open it up. The images they used were beamed back in the old conventional methods thus these abnormalities arose... end of story really
@21Essexlad it doesnt matter how they were sent, you are claiming those are development marks which is impossible if they were developed in space. the satellite doesnt make a negative and copy it and send it back. its digital until it gets here, moron.
@21Essexlad we arent talking about how they sent the pictures to earth. we are talking about how the satellite develops them. and you seem to be claiming the photos reach an analog state while still inside of the satellite, then they develop imperfections while inside the satellite, then they are digitally beamed back to earth, imperfections permanently obscuring whatever may be under it. and im sorry, but sending a picture over radio waves wont create a water mark. nor can you make one in space
@orange12089 I never said they were chemically developed in a satellite I said they sent via TV signal and when developed here on earth there were imperfections?? It clearly explains how they were developed in the 1960's on the google moon app itself under the ? over the abnormalities... which i have discussed in prior comments?? Take a look yourself! i appreciate not calling me a moron aswell my friend. i tell you what ill save you the hassle ill explain the process.....
@orange12089 The Lunar Orbiter camera system was a marvel of engineering for its time. Built long before the advent of digital sensors, the Lunar Orbiter camera captured images on black and white film that was developed on the spacecraft and then scanned with an electron gun and photo-multiplier tube, one strip at a time.
@orange12089 The image data was then beamed back to earth as a TV signal where another system exposed film on the Earth to match the film in space, and this transfer back to film was developed using another chemical process.
@orange12089 The entire apparatus for capturing, processing, scanning, and transmitting the photographs was all housed in a pressurized, thermally controlled container. Needless to say, there were many opportunities for imperfections to creep in.
@21Essexlad haha oh yeah, and for the last time, i dont care whether or not they are the originals. that is irrelevant to what we are discussing. so, if you have half a brain, you also should realize that the originality of the photos has nothing to do with what we are talking about. What IM saying is, no matter if it was in the 1960's or yesterday, you cannot develop film, the conventional way, in space. you would need either some sort of dry fixer/developer, or a new proprietary way to develop
@orange12089 lol oh dear. my friend take a look on google moon yourself??? locate near apollo 11 landing find the imperfections and click on the question mark it explains it all...... and i was saying that they were the originals as you were talking about digital photos and the LRO which had no relevance.
@21Essexlad well then, you are right. i really must apologize. i cant blame anyone else but NASA. they really outdid themselves. Physical to analog to digital to analog. Thats ridiculously tedious. i mean, do what you have to do, i respect that. but after continuing the reading on the question mark it also became apparent that those analog pictures are still the highest quality shots of the moon we have. THAT, i dont respect.
@orange12089 Yes a tedious process i agree. No i agree i dont respect the fact that they were the best shots we had. google earth has the most recent digital sattelite imagery for the moon and until that LRO mission is complete where they will get a complete mapping of the moon as you so rightly explained, then i guess we just have to wait and make do
@21Essexlad which should be like this june, if im not mistaken. or perhaps thats when the just start releasing the 3D & color coded topographicals. im not too sure. either way, im impatient.
this doesnt even look like the real moon
letusvibe 1 week ago
I think that the moon is manmade!!! By GIANTS!!! THE MOON USED TO HAVE GIANTS IN IT AND THE BODIES OF THE GIANTS ARE STILL TRAPPED IN THE MOON!!! I HAVE PROOF OF THIS BTW!!! I JUST MANAGED TO CAPTURE IT ON FILM AND YOU CAN DO THE SAME!!! Use your iPhone on the enlarge images of the moon!!!
walitung 2 weeks ago
Looks like water drops on the camera lense
wizardtech1 3 weeks ago
What a stupid video. The spacecraft that took those images was ancient and actually developed its photos on board the orbiter in its own pressurized container. The images were then sent back to Earth as TV broadcasts. When you consider this, the imperfections in the photography are impressive for being so minimal. So no, it's not aliens. Wish it were, though.
yalision 4 weeks ago
At 5:26, The same dark ground shadow repeats three times? Like the same piece of moon was duplicated... Very strange.
henkwoodhouse 1 month ago
wait! u can google map the moon?? idk that
sonicxlc123 4 months ago 3
@sonicxlc123 the moon, earth, mars, and sky!
nemisestoic 3 weeks ago
I was looking at google moon and i found a huge alien face in the dirt...im pretty sure google put it there as a goof but its deffinitly agrey aliens face and head..its pretty cool actually
rickythepitbull 4 months ago
I have a video of a glass dome as well as an alien structure. Feel free to take a look. Thanks and Peace
bigbrotherwatcha 4 months ago
0:51 WTF is THAT??
MasterAirAang 4 months ago
that is not the moon, the moon has dinosaurs and ice cream waterfalls
joey5605 4 months ago
dome like cities. They use the black class like cover for protection for UV rays.
TaiwanSCW 5 months ago
crop circle
bavwill 5 months ago
@I @can @make @a @blue @comment
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago
most of these markings looks like fingerprints or watermarks or film deterioration on the negatives...If I was an alien being I would not make the moon my base of choice...why?...look at it...it is a meteor magnet...even the astronauts were leary about staying too long
bozo47p 5 months ago
As i see any ass hole around the world put bull sheet here and say this is secret for another fool ashole
tomspeed2005 5 months ago
Wondering what this is? No, it's not an alien colony. It is a processing artifact in this image of the Moon, which was taken by one of the Lunar Orbiter satellites in the mid-1960s.
You can learn more about these artifacts, and the work currently underway to digitally scan all the old Lunar Orbiter imagery, from the U.S. Geological Survey.
mrprosale 5 months ago
It looks like a Martian golf course inside the crater at 2.06. I am not saying this as a joke.
CardinalSinga 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Aliens are ancient people from India that left the earth, due to nuclear war and natural disaster, over 20,000 years ago in vimanas and settled in subterranean worlds of mars and our moon. They are far advanced technologically & spiritually and dont want to resettled on earth thats on a destructive path. They are monitoring earth activities. Its well documented in the Vedas.All major governments knows this. The US & England are long studying the text and trying to build similar crafts
brucaX10 6 months ago
If anyone seriously thinks that those are real then you are truly in need of help. Google always throws in a couple Easter eggs. They did in Google Earth a lot. Also, we didn't go back to the moon cuz pf budget cuts, not aliens. After the last shuttle is launched, NASA is planning on landing on an asteroid. Why would we want to land on an asteroid? Well cuz if you think about it. We can use it as a cheaper, alternative means of travel when going long distance in space (like to mars).
MADCHANCE 6 months ago
@MADCHANCE NASA should get enough fucking money to fly people to mars, since, that would be fucking epic sauce
TehSkalias 6 months ago
@TehSkalias They are. Why do you think we stopped the Space Shuttle program? By 2025 NASA plans on landing on an asteroid, then they said by like 2025 - 2035 they plan on landing on Mars.
MADCHANCE 6 months ago
@MADCHANCE The cheap ass way is good, but the old fasion way I say is the best ;D
TehSkalias 6 months ago
Nice try pal! bad overlay for the bits that require depth. once ya spot that.... it mostly looks fabricated
jonandronelle9 7 months ago
what is the name of the piece @ 2:12 pls? tx
MrTeejaysingh 7 months ago
@MrTeejaysingh i think it's koyanisqaatsi or something. its from an 80's movie. if that isn't the song just check the rest of the links it'll be in there.
HEartthrobtawd 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Internet Explorer?
Are you from the past?
sebdub42 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Internet Explorer?
Are you from the past?
sebdub42 8 months ago
wtf i looked it up and i dont see any shit of this o.o why @!!!
madkiller566 8 months ago
0:45 its aliens summer camp
SexyMushroomguy99 8 months ago
Penis
shackaduck 8 months ago
Penis
shackaduck 8 months ago
I like watching this kind of vids before going to sleep, this helps me to make funny dreams and that's remind me childhood. But actually I'm getting more and more disappointed ,' cause so many of these vids are crap & absolutely not convincing
Last time, I saw a slideshow of rainbow and/or sun photos, supposed to be the sky before haarp-induced earthquakes in various parts of the world
btw, reptilians sneak inside your home to steal your sock in your washing machine, this is how they survive
gamerananas 9 months ago
The music was great. Names of those songs please. Thanks.
berengenutti 9 months ago
Ever done any old style photographic processing? They're called drying marks
davidenespana 9 months ago
@davidenespana are you saying these photos are done in an "old style photographic processing" way?i would think they are digital pictures but what do i know.
MrGodssonsatan 9 months ago
@MrGodssonsatan Yup. Most photographs of the moon pre-date digital photography. The originals are most likely transparencies somewhere in a filing cabinet at NASA. Of course they've since been scanned - but all the original analogue defects would have been transferred as well.
davidenespana 7 months ago
@MrGodssonsatan Yup. Most of the lunar survey was done in the 60's in preparation for the Apollo landings. No digital imaging then.
davidenespana 5 months ago
Google! Ever heard of Windex?
DaddyOD13 9 months ago
@Zoroasterrrr I'll have a copy of that book once you're done. Sounds awesome! lol Yeah, I get your point. There's so much weird shit on youtube that it's like a forum for the insane to think of crazy shit and post it in an attempt to get idiots to believe it. Some will say you're crazy for believing it, others for not believing it. Ridiculous!
Itsmeeman1 9 months ago
how "secret" is it if you can just go on google and find it?
ased215er 9 months ago
alright everybody. we are use to this. its just alien grafiti. lol jk. but this is very intersting. iam always intrested in ufos. sense ive seen so many
colt45mac 9 months ago
You suck nasa.
NASAsCO2LIES 9 months ago
those must be really secret, even nasa has not been yet covered them, oh and by the way, those "stains" are a liquid spills in the development of the film thats about how secret it gets, maybe nasa is trying to hide their bloopers....
QualityCompare 9 months ago
Youuuuuuuuuu..... Peopleeeeeeeeee.......
luminositymusic 9 months ago
Looks like the stuff i draw all over my textbooks. lol
killercreek450 9 months ago
@killercreek450 you might make a good astronaught..
KungFriedChicken 9 months ago
fuck you people im going to my secret underground lair beneath Los Alomos, and the Denver airport and right a book about contrails, the locness monster, bigfoot, swampgas, solar flares, 2012, alien gray's, laserbeams, NASA, The Vector Logo, antigravity, rail guns in low earth orbit, the 4th dimension, tetrahedral mathmatics,.19.5 degrees North or South, The Cydonia Mars anomalys, the moon hoax, santa claus, the tooth fairy, easter bunny, ufo sightings, and giant lizards that fly in the sky.
Zoroasterrrr 10 months ago
Obviously the moon watches avatar and is trying to communicate with us
mrg1208 10 months ago
could it be transformer 3 ?? :p
datamini999 10 months ago 8
Someone sneezed on the camera lense
4E047RHH 10 months ago
Wanna get high?
aldrc007 10 months ago
That looks like a huge hand print.
Clayjrjr2 10 months ago
what a crock :p
LurkyMcLurkerton 11 months ago
i just checked google moon today there wasn't there, do you think they got repressed or something? drop a message, thanks, what a fascinating subject
myagalactic 11 months ago
Apollo 13 after they came from behind the dark side of the moon, goes something like this "Just wanted to inform you, that there is a Santa..." Many folks believe that was another way of saying that aliens are real and they are on our moon...
Ur2ez4me81 11 months ago 25
@Ur2ez4me81 ........one problem here apollo 13 was shot in a studio on earth, it was faked...the seven missions was entirely shot in a studio...it was a hollywood trickery...they used FRONT SCREEN PROJECTION perfected by stanley Kubrick in his 2001 space odessey....stanley kubrick faked the moon landing
robertk131 10 months ago
@robertk131 what about the moon rocks they brought back, weren't they verified "officially?" Who really knows but I have heard about that theory as well...lol
Ur2ez4me81 10 months ago
@Ur2ez4me81 ahahahahahahahah i suggest you to see this : Moon Landing Hoax : Disney Made Apollo Rocks with Dogs & Cartoon Characters Hidden in Them......it's all fake the space shuttle, apollo, gemini, mercury...again suggestion : International Space Station Hoax : Air Bubbles Rise- Space Walks Simulated in A Massive Water Pool
robertk131 10 months ago
@robertk131 lol, haha hold up are you saying the space staion is a hoax? I dunno about that one I've seen that a few times with binoculars...The moon landings maybe but not the space station...Thats like saying satalites aren't real...
Ur2ez4me81 10 months ago
@Ur2ez4me81 none of the five stations never existed...not even one astronauts(in fact they're only actors playing a disney film)never ever walked in space...(1)Saliout, (3)Skylab ,(5)apollo-soyouz,(6) MIR, (10) ISS...MIR was only a miniature model...ISS :all the spacewalks are filmed in Johnson space centre inside a gigentic pool with at the bottom a rotating plastic earth a spaceshuttle and the full station...check it out
robertk131 10 months ago
@Ur2ez4me81 none of the five stations never existed...not even one astronauts(in fact they're only actors playing a disney film)never ever walked in space...(1)Saliout, (3)Skylab ,(5)apollo-soyouz,(6) MIR, (10) ISS...MIR was only a miniature model...ISS :all the spacewalks are filmed in Johnson space centre inside a gigentic pool with at the bottom a rotating plastic earth a spaceshuttle and the full station...check it out
robertk131 10 months ago
@robertk131 id like to see soem proff, not some random dudes opinions, seems like they have more proof than you... id go with them in court in saying that they went to the moon
wrexayl 10 months ago
@robertk131 id like to see soem proff, not some random dudes opinions, seems like they have more proof than you... id go with them in court in saying that they went to the moon, should go back to 4chan
wrexayl 10 months ago
@Ur2ez4me81 first thing the moon is not ours and yes apollo 13 is real
MrBeastnare 7 months ago
@MrBeastnare what do you mean the moon is not ours? When I made that statement I was referring to the moon that is visible in our skies & the same old "rock" which has gravitational effects on our planet. Wait, are you talking to me I'm confused?
Ur2ez4me81 7 months ago
@Ur2ez4me81 Several of the astronauts who flew to the moon during the Apollo Missions (24 men have flown to the moon) have become adament that aliens exist after leaving NASA.... Who knows? Most of the Apollo Alien claims have been debunked though.
yesiamawizardjonny 5 months ago
@yesiamawizardjonny scary...makes you wonder why we haven't been back in a while.
Ur2ez4me81 5 months ago
I love the music you picked , thanks a lot!
dancingwithoutwords 11 months ago
Woops, spoke to soon, gay... (this insult not necessarily made with intention to offend homosexuals)
rgs11 11 months ago
This video only wins because of the music, which is what btw?
rgs11 11 months ago
Superb video. I have confirmed most of these anomalies on google moon myself. Astounding evidence of bases and craft flying at high altitudes, you can clearly see the shadowing from the overhead craft. These are not blotches on the film. There is a reason we never returned to the moon. In Neil Armstrong's words "We were warned off the moon" Unfortunately he did'nt elaborate further, now I can see why. The thoughts of alien beings right on our doorstep observing our every move would cause panic.
dublintoffee 11 months ago
When you click that questionmark, it says: "Wondering what this is? No, it's not an alien colony. It is a processing artifact in this image of the Moon, which was taken by one of the Lunar Orbiter satellites in the mid-1960s."
Dragonelis 11 months ago
NASA removes objects they do not want you to see such as building structures on the moon.NASA doesn't even take the time to fill in the blurs, blotches or black spots as if they somehow want people to know they removed something,but this is what a NASA employee said,it's just common place to remove any sign of intelligent life on other planets.Such admission could cause total chaos amongst religions. It's better that people remain ignorant so churches can make money & control their congregations
GlobalAwareness2525 11 months ago
My Suggestion would be to stop messin with that 2D crap and get you Google Earth 4.2 or something. Then you will really start having some fun!!! I myself am Addicted to the Sky Map.......Hours and hours of roaming the universe fing strange looking stuff at every turn.
Future0fFilm 11 months ago
Alien golf course
superdavey69 1 year ago
Great choice of music :D
theawesomeviolinist 1 year ago
Wondering what this is? No, it's not an alien colony. It is a processing artifact in this image of the Moon, which was taken by one of the Lunar Orbiter satellites in the mid-1960s. ;)
demolka20 1 year ago
I DON'T SEE FAKE. THEY JUST NEED A GOOD UP DATE! HAVE A LOOK TO THE NEW JAPANESE 2009 MISSION PICTURES... BETTER AND BETTER... BUT STILL DIFFICULT TO SEE WITH A NAKED EYE THE LEM PARKED WHERE THEY LEFT IT... THEY PROMISED THAT SHORTLY WE COULD ENJOY FULL DETAILS OF ALL APOLLO MISSIONS.
elevenby2 1 year ago
NASA isn't going to let you see whats on the moon period, well not yet anyway. As for the question did we really land on the moon or was the footage fake, the answer is yes to both scenarios. The live audio feed from that mission has 11mins missing of a description of structures and such, try finding that if you can, bet you can't but too many people who heard it remember. Hence the fake footage to cover it up. The structures on the moon imo were built by the chinese, this is in their history.
carvinemup 1 year ago
If you're not a kid, and have some knowledge of photography, you'll know what 'drying marks' are.
davidenespana 1 year ago
omg - do u really think google gives out pictures of the moon without checking them????
lol
ohh kiddo
amygrindhouse 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fantastic! I'd love to know the coordinates.......
Google is right about using 60's vintage Lunar Orbiter imagery. It's the best we have (at least to the general public). A recent re-discovery of the of original data tapes has got NASA busy digitizing them with stunning results. NASA plans to make all data sets free to the public.
Google LORIP to see:
Bmovie5000 1 year ago
Fantastic! I'd love to know the coordinates.......
Google is right about using 60's vintage Lunar Orbiter imagery. It's the best we have (at least to the general public). A recent re-discovery of the of original data tapes has got NASA busy digitizing them with stunning results. NASA plans to make all data sets free to the public.
See LORIP
Bmovie5000 1 year ago
4:45 awww it's an adorable vagina!
WalterSolano 1 year ago
am i the only one who thinks google moon is fake like seriosly they still dont know everything do you really think there gonna let us just look so if somthing happens we can just see it? I dont think so. and also idek if we ever landed on the moon and some theorys say there are aliens on the moon but we dont know so i think google moon is fake.
olunt 1 year ago
@olunt :Why not just check Google StreetView of that neighborhood of the moon? :-P
bearium 1 year ago 28
fingerprints on film
beatrice040603 1 year ago
HMM Google Moon Easter Eggs
ooijiyoung 1 year ago
Ya'know if there is life out there they are not keeping up with our technology because we keep seeing them and they ethier do'nt care or do'nt know yet,they must think that people are very stupid not to talk' no longer can the so called aliens depend on the witness being dismissed as a kook or the town drunk our tech.is catching them it will not be long before someone,somehow gets proof and show's it to the media and puts it on display.
mrchopperking1 1 year ago
Looks like water
RagingBubuli 1 year ago
Let us dream again with other video. I apreciate. Greets from France
jmstrasbourg 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Check out this site ''theufotimes'' has credible information.
Maarif59 1 year ago
Amazing!
PerfectDecalibration 1 year ago
the first 1 looks like a giant thumbprint
imafirindalazor 1 year ago
So gullible - its an overlay!!
ggwillym 1 year ago
Awesome!!
timw1959 1 year ago
google moon is made by satellite imaging not film moron
xprtnegotiator 1 year ago
@xprtnegotiator According to Google the images of the moon are from film that was taken by the lunar orbiters in the 60's. The images are not satellite imaging because NASA claims that the old photo's are the clearest images we can get so far...
prometheus882002 1 year ago
they arent a sectert anymore!!!
chil0man 1 year ago
The moon has mascons, or counterweights. So, if something big hits it it will right itself like Bozo. Moon was made by ancient universe architects. Or, it is a spaceship.
Saying what the moon is a 'proving' it are 2 different tings.
seapeddler 1 year ago
this ridiculous why is googe earth pictures so clear and up close ,you can zoom in on a dime when the satalite is so far in space but google moon you cant zoom up to anything.stop wasting our time
beahgtm 1 year ago
it's called processing artifacts, the moon was shot on film, then developed on board of spacecraft
Vitaminnn07 1 year ago
A lot of the music you use in your videos are also played in Grand Theft Auto 4 lol I like your videos keep them coming
Sasule21 1 year ago
Got answers watch?v=zu-tSA2qzag
6ho6stinthem6chine 1 year ago
Photographic Image Artifact
Wondering what this is? No, it's not an alien colony. It is a processing artifact in this image of the Moon, which was taken by one of the Lunar Orbiter satellites in the mid-1960s.
The Lunar Orbiter camera system was a marvel of engineering for its time. Built long before the advent of digital sensors, the Lunar Orbiter camera captured images on black and white film that was developed on the spacecraft and then scanned with an electron gun ...
TheMrLusk 1 year ago
@TheMrLusk Surprisingly, the Lunar Orbiter images are still the best images available of much of the Moon, and this is one of many reasons why NASA and other space agencies are sending a new generation of satellites to the Moon over the next few years.
You can learn more about these artifacts, and the work currently underway to digitally scan all the old Lunar Orbiter imagery, from the U.S. Geological Survey.
TheMrLusk 1 year ago
why is the moon moving while the white dots are standing still for a moment around 2:54 ;-)
oooAndyooo 1 year ago
water drops on photo from developing
zambot3 1 year ago
dude the apollo 11 one. i am in the exact place you are but that thing isnt there and the area around the apollo 11 is completely blurred out where that thing is supposed to be. send me coordinates of everything so i can double check AGAIN. v.v
Jrockershadow 1 year ago
NASA BLOCKED EVERYTHING
DoTaSoOo 1 year ago
It seems they have since blocked out those images on google earth/moon
there is a 360 camera you can view ant it shows a glimps of the formation you show at the begining .
heres something cool i found ... check it before they brush it out
moon co-ordinate
25D 50' 55.43"N - 147D 17' 58.06E ( MECHANICAL OBJECT )
diceman2004 1 year ago
google moon isn't going to show you anything the moderators don't want you to see. the seafloor just off the coast of texas where thousands of miles of pipelines have been laid on the seafloor is a perfect example. on google earth it's just one big blurred out grey. more manipulation by the man.
ereket 1 year ago
For those "mistery circles" watch "moon Rising" film By Escamilla here in youtube. Seing true color os the moon its cool.... and yet revealing
Palenque52 1 year ago
LOL those aren't places ....they are photo deffects ..chill
toniquix 1 year ago
I am a photographer and i work with film and chemical development. I am sure such imperfections cannot occur!! So most probably aliens are there already.
YezdiRK 1 year ago
I know I should not be but it still amazes me how ignorant people can be here on YouTube. They have no answers except to say its fake and throw in a vulgar insult. And most are probably writing from their parents' basement. If I were alien I would stay far away too, eventually if there are enough of those people we will wipe ourselves out and they can have a planet without lifting a finger.
fastdriver0 1 year ago
I just looked this up...theres nothing there ....FAIL
lovexxcharm 1 year ago
@lovexxcharm thats because this version is 2008 you retard its been updated 100's of time since then
GarethEvs3 1 year ago
This video gets my right nut's approval....
TheRudeAmerican 1 year ago
someone got their prints on the negative
macgreeny 1 year ago
This interference
satainkara 1 year ago
Most of it looks like fingerprints on a lens or a neg, or waterspots from developer . Depends on when the pictures were taken.
davedufour 1 year ago
i believe there is space creatures as in animals that able to survive in space and some cant be seen with our naked eyes there more colours than just our spectrum.
tiGGrteik 1 year ago
GOOD JOB !!!
SKORTSENI1 1 year ago
its a glitch fucktard
Falkonzzzzz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dude its a fucking glitch!dumbass!now get off your ass and leave the star trek convention nerd!
Falkonzzzzz 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
dumb fucks its a fucking glich, thats what u get for being a fat virgin, now go get laid at your fucking gay space nerd convention, u mean i only watched this shit cause im german
josiahstelzer 1 year ago
The first pattern might have been the markings of lance and buzz's crochet game haha
dougie24fresh 1 year ago
@dougie24fresh hahaha yeah because lance armstrong went to the moon right? fucking moron you mean neil? people are fucking dumb.........
EasyRyderr 1 year ago
Mad magazine's Alfred E. Newman is that first picture.
bosatsu76 1 year ago
why is everyone so stupid, google is only a search engine, they have all US Goverment support must be for a reason, stop using google products or products with google stocks in them.
Switch to a private and encrypted search engine like IXQUICK,com or DUKGO.com
ElPeruanoUFO 1 year ago
Check out an interesting pic I found of a ufo on the moon..I posted it here on Youtube
fastdriver0 1 year ago
SPACE NAZIS
Clawgern 1 year ago
wat no way
mindspeedracer 1 year ago
big cicle thing on the moon mabey a cemetary
KCTattooist101 1 year ago
They just look like rendering anomalies to me.
sharkhead7854 1 year ago 2
like some people have already mentioned its when they developed the film back in the 60's with a series of chemical processes and imperfections may of got in there distorting the images. the distortions are on top of the image not a part of the image thats clearly seen they dont follow any contours of craters or the lunar surface. one way to check is grab yaself a expensive telescope and have a look yourself.... hope people are not too dissapointed
21Essexlad 1 year ago 16
@21Essexlad Yep, I agree, Looks like a smudge to me but good observation though. I like the music, I used it to watch the Face of Mars geometry analysis.
CaptainNomura 1 year ago
@21Essexlad so how come on the Apollo mission one of the pilots say on the radio " sir we have found a base down here " ?
CloneTrooperKieran 1 year ago
@CloneTrooperKieran which apollo mission was that i have seen the full log or apollo 11 and cant see that anywhere let me know :)
21Essexlad 1 year ago
@21Essexlad I also looked at this in Google Earth and switched to moon view. I looked in the same place and the anomalies are not there. So how do you explain the discrepancy between Google Earth and Google Moon?
I have processed a lot of film in my day and had goofs of mis-loading the reels. I never had blotches like this.
analogpix1 1 year ago
@analogpix1 simple...ones google earth and others google moon,they're two seperate entity's bud ;}
weadone 1 year ago
@weadone I thought Google is Google. Wouldn't the images come from the same source? Doesn't make any sense.
analogpix1 1 year ago
@analogpix1 i was being sarcastic a bit bud. ;}
weadone 1 year ago
@analogpix1 becoz the newer version of google earth as been updated to counter these blotches by satellite images taken digitally not reels like these use to use in the 60's. Also the method of transferring the images back to earth was using alot of chemical processes and electron gun usage. "go to google moon and click on the question marks. they expain"
The reason why you didnt have blotches like this is maybe your images were not being beamed from space as a tv signal like these were??
21Essexlad 1 year ago
@21Essexlad dear friend i am using a telescope and a darn expensive and sensitive one but the amount of zoom a satelite lens can achieve is unreachable.
So thats not a solution.
On top of that the photos that were published back then in the press are different from the ones NASA released in their website when it 1st opened and they still insist they are the same.
Do some extended research from different sources.You will be amazed by the ''holes in the script''
omsigbug 11 months ago
@omsigbug with respect i cannot see every bit of research known to man, the originals look the same to me. but the images that we can see on the vid, are "clearly" not settlements. its clearly a overlay you must see this? it doesnt repectively follow any contours of the lunar surface or crators? The comment about grabbing yaself a telescope was not meant to be taken literally my friend :) i was merely saying the only way your gonna see it is by looking yourself, attend a observatory and see
21Essexlad 11 months ago
@21Essexlad that's what it says when you click on the question mark. Google out that on there. Do you really believe that Google is telling you the truth and that they're not contributing to the cover-up?
chubacaman1 11 months ago
@chubacaman1 I am a sceptic in most things but you have to just take a look at the images themselves.... like on my old post, you can see its a overlay and not part of the image... also, all the cover up stories etc whats there to gain from it?? if there is intelligent life like us, why cover it up? doesnt make sense.
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@21Essexlad Have you heard of the Illuminati? Maybe they could be involved. And they might ave the cover ups because they might know something we don't. It's impossible to tell, unless we go straight up to NASA and take all their shit.
chubacaman1 10 months ago
@21Essexlad yeah, back when people developed film. its 2011 and now we have satellites orbiting the moon with telescopic digital cameras, such as the LRO, which dont need to develop film. how would they get it back here anyway? thats a lot of postage.
orange12089 10 months ago
@orange12089 how would they get what back here? the images? it was beamed using the same signals as what the conventional TV's use/used. when the data was collected and transferred to a viable image distortions and imperfections were suseptable to arise.
I am aware of the current digital technology in how we gain images now. but the images that were used here were before digital sattelite signals were used to gain more images that was used in the current updates on google earth/moon.
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@21Essexlad ...i was being sarcastic, hence the joke about paying for postage to ship 1960's dated pictures back from the LRO, which only reached the moon in April, 2010 by the way, its a rather new satellite.
orange12089 10 months ago
@21Essexlad
Oh yeah, The LROC (The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Camera) comprises a pair of narrow-angle cameras (NAC) and a single wide-angle camera (WAC). LROC will fly several times over the historic Apollo lunar landing sites at 31 miles (50 km) altitude; with the camera's high resolution, the lunar rovers and Lunar Module descent stages and their respective shadows will be clearly visible, along with other equipment previously left on the Moon.
orange12089 10 months ago
@21Essexlad
The mission will return approximately 70–100 Terabytes of image data, too much to ever be sent in an analog format such as you are suggesting. The images are captured with a photocell that transfer the data into raw binary information which is then sent back to earth using conventional radio waves, received and transferred back into an image.
orange12089 10 months ago
@21Essexlad
Oh yeah, The Lunar Exploration Neutron Detector (LEND) will also provide measurements, create maps, detect possible near-surface water ice deposits using the ultraviolet light from stars and the interplanetary medium to peer into permanently shadowed craters in search of water ice.
orange12089 10 months ago
@orange12089 all that sounds awfully deserved of a medal and if i could id give you one myself for reeling somethings off the net i would lol, but whats that got to do with the images we see here??? considering that the title suggests that these are from google moon "2008" which does not co-inside with the LRO mission of 2009, its kind of rendered that null and void and not relating to this topic. the images they used for around the areas which are shown in this vid are the originals
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@21Essexlad @21Essexlad who said they were not original photos? We are not discussing the authenticity of the photos, but rather their mode of development. Try to stay on topic. Now that you understand that, understand this. they werent chemically developed in a satellite in the vacuum of space. developing photos requires several types of chemical changes, most involving converting silver ions into silver metal using developer, but im sure you already knew that.
orange12089 10 months ago
@21Essexlad It also involves things such as silver-halide crystals which are removed in the fixing bath. The fixer dissolves only silver-halide crystals, leaving the silver metal behind to swell to create the negative. ah, but one last problem, now the negative is covered in detached, partially dissolved silver-halide crystals which can be easily washed off with liquid water producing a clean, crystal free negative! easy!
orange12089 10 months ago
@21Essexlad oh, wait...liquid water + freezing vacuum of space = cant develop photos in space.
orange12089 10 months ago
@21Essexlad
so, the images we see here are certainly not from the "chemically developed" era but most certainly from the digital era. You, or anyone else for that matter, probably could have deduced this themselves if you had just looked up the launch date for the LRO (18 June 2009 21:32:00 UTC)
orange12089 10 months ago
@orange12089 Originals being from the Lunar and Plantary Institute and many other sources. The sources they used in this google moon app can be seen on the "about google moon" when you first open it up. The images they used were beamed back in the old conventional methods thus these abnormalities arose... end of story really
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@21Essexlad it doesnt matter how they were sent, you are claiming those are development marks which is impossible if they were developed in space. the satellite doesnt make a negative and copy it and send it back. its digital until it gets here, moron.
orange12089 10 months ago
@21Essexlad we arent talking about how they sent the pictures to earth. we are talking about how the satellite develops them. and you seem to be claiming the photos reach an analog state while still inside of the satellite, then they develop imperfections while inside the satellite, then they are digitally beamed back to earth, imperfections permanently obscuring whatever may be under it. and im sorry, but sending a picture over radio waves wont create a water mark. nor can you make one in space
orange12089 10 months ago
@orange12089 I never said they were chemically developed in a satellite I said they sent via TV signal and when developed here on earth there were imperfections?? It clearly explains how they were developed in the 1960's on the google moon app itself under the ? over the abnormalities... which i have discussed in prior comments?? Take a look yourself! i appreciate not calling me a moron aswell my friend. i tell you what ill save you the hassle ill explain the process.....
21Essexlad 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@orange12089 The Lunar Orbiter camera system was a marvel of engineering for its time. Built long before the advent of digital sensors, the Lunar Orbiter camera captured images on black and white film that was developed on the spacecraft and then scanned with an electron gun and photo-multiplier tube, one strip at a time.
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@orange12089 The image data was then beamed back to earth as a TV signal where another system exposed film on the Earth to match the film in space, and this transfer back to film was developed using another chemical process.
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@orange12089 The entire apparatus for capturing, processing, scanning, and transmitting the photographs was all housed in a pressurized, thermally controlled container. Needless to say, there were many opportunities for imperfections to creep in.
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@orange12089 That is how all photographs taken via satellite prior to the digital age was taken, analysed and process, thus imperfections arose.....
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@21Essexlad haha oh yeah, and for the last time, i dont care whether or not they are the originals. that is irrelevant to what we are discussing. so, if you have half a brain, you also should realize that the originality of the photos has nothing to do with what we are talking about. What IM saying is, no matter if it was in the 1960's or yesterday, you cannot develop film, the conventional way, in space. you would need either some sort of dry fixer/developer, or a new proprietary way to develop
orange12089 10 months ago
@orange12089 lol oh dear. my friend take a look on google moon yourself??? locate near apollo 11 landing find the imperfections and click on the question mark it explains it all...... and i was saying that they were the originals as you were talking about digital photos and the LRO which had no relevance.
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@21Essexlad well then, you are right. i really must apologize. i cant blame anyone else but NASA. they really outdid themselves. Physical to analog to digital to analog. Thats ridiculously tedious. i mean, do what you have to do, i respect that. but after continuing the reading on the question mark it also became apparent that those analog pictures are still the highest quality shots of the moon we have. THAT, i dont respect.
orange12089 10 months ago
@orange12089 Yes a tedious process i agree. No i agree i dont respect the fact that they were the best shots we had. google earth has the most recent digital sattelite imagery for the moon and until that LRO mission is complete where they will get a complete mapping of the moon as you so rightly explained, then i guess we just have to wait and make do
21Essexlad 10 months ago
@21Essexlad which should be like this june, if im not mistaken. or perhaps thats when the just start releasing the 3D & color coded topographicals. im not too sure. either way, im impatient.
orange12089 10 months ago