@SlamdogX It is somewhat complicated... I cannot argue with your basic statement of facts, because it is in effect true, apart from the fact ER was not directly involved, and her family has only been ruling for less than 300 years, the Hanover and Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (renamed Windsor) lines... but much of the infrastructrure put in place... ie railways, diplomacy, even culture , has remained in place and has allowed new (actually very old) peoples like India to emerge with strength.
SO MANY SCHOOLS YET SO MANY FOOLS KNOWLEDGE IN THE HANDS OF THE WISE IS CREATIVE AND KNOWLEDGE IN THE HANDS OF THE FOOLISH IS DESTRUCTIVE TIME TO KNOW THY SELF PEACE AND LOVE
@mcgrewrich 1867 Canada Left British Power And Became A Country. The Queen Is Just A Figure In Our Government Yet She Is Not The Final Say In It. Maybe Read Up On Your Facts Before Going All Retard On This Video.
Canada finally gained independence in 1982 (Constitution Act). Prior to that there was the Balfour Declaration and the Westminster Statute which eased a very peaceful and friendly separation.
Canada isn't a real country, it's just a British crown colony, as the Queen of Canada delightfully gloats in this video. Tell me, Canadians, when did Canada become an independent nation and cease to be a British colony? It never did! Canada's head of state is still the Queen of England, who exercises power over Canada's Parliament through her appointed Governor-General. The Governor-General can suspend Parliament, choose which party should form a government, etc., on the Queen's behalf.
Canada eased away from the U.K. starting with the BNA Act 1867, Balfour Declaration 1926 & the Westminster Staute 1931 and finally the Constitution Act in 1982. Technically it ceased to be a colony in 1926 and gained full independence by 1982.
The Queen, and or the Govenor General serve at Canada's request. She is not thrust upon us by London. We choose a Constitutional Monarch. It can be changed if enough Canadians wish it so.
@feindhortmit most people dont understand this and make silly bigoted comments about the Royal family while unaware that there not thrust upon anyone British Canadians and Australians chose to keep them as we value tradition and culture .
@TommyGun8142 get your facts right before you come up with crap like that, we pay 70p a year in taxes to the royal family and tourism alone makes that money back and even makes money to the uk.
@andrewm153351 She is, and has been the world's most famous woman for near 60 years now. And in truth she does not "rule" any country, merely retains her office as the head of state. Plus, people love her. Presidents wish that had that much star power.
@SamuraiChick7777 I'm not saying it as an insult. You could literally see it on the video, that the flag was upside down. The one who created this video, did insult Canada, for putting their flag the wrong-way round.
@bermudarailway And contributed not alot, the french, a nation of cowards as can be seen right now sucking up to the Germans in the EU,after being taken over in WW2.As General Patton said "I would rather have a German division in front of me than a french one behind me ."
we let you win... you were beginning to drag us behind, wait... even after the war the white guys that we left over there were still... well not to be racist but you see where this is going, dont you!
Canada is not more wealthy than great britain that's way your military bay second hand equipment from the uk and britain is one of the largest forces on the ground in afghanistan and britain is building the two largest aircraft carriers in the world with the most advanced air craft and London is the trading capital of the west.
we are more wealthy than they why should we alow this nonsense to continue monarchys are dead old blood lines are watered down no one can truly say they are one specific race or of complete royal decent i as a member of a unconquered native race the cree would never bow to any monarchy as of much as our government which is ever falling from its grace as a peoples government and more turning into a buisness for the elite we have more resources and natural land than any other country
@LLOYD19851012 No there not they rebeled and the French, Spanish and The Netherlands backed them up kicking are arses into Canada but they were still unable to defeat us in Canada.
@LLOYD19851012 The US WAS (past tense) colonized by the British a long time ago, but no longer, since they've gained independence from the UK in 1776.
@iSorrowproductions Like I said go back to history class maybe you might learn or you know looks at The Bill of Rights, Deceleration of Independence or The Constitution
@iSorrowproductions its pretty funny how much about how we won The Revolution and and the war of 1812 that they dont teach you about over your pretty stupid to say if you took history in any other country you would fail oh wait my bad you failed it over there to
@iSorrowproductions You lost I find it funny that mother nature won us the battle and we re built dumbass the White House got burned not the Capital Building tard
Do you know WHY our whitehouse was burned? Because days before WE went into toronto (then called yorktown) and burned the ENTIRE CITY down, including many parliament buildings, and even looted from the whole town
It's so funny how your history books never teach you this fact.
And the war of 1812 was a draw. BOTH sides didn't get what they wanted. Canada and the uk wanted sole authority of the great lakes, which they didn't get, and many other things
@andrewm153351 You know the U.S. has tried to invade Canada, or had plans to invade Canada, several times in its history. It did not succeed any of the times.
First of the ONLY time we actually tried to invade canada was in the war of 1812. All of those other times were plans for war in case war broke out between us. That didn't mean we were planning to invade.
And nobody won the war of 1812. Canada wasn't even a country then.
Also, Obama is the most important and powerful human being on the planet. EVERYONE wishes they had his power.
And the queen controls the commonwealth's military, so yeah, she rules you.
@andrewm153351 Mate, I know that, I grew up in California since I was 4. I have taken U.S. history enough times (including Advanced Placement). I do not say anyone won the war of 1812.I merely said that the U.S. did not succeed in conquering Canada. And I said star power, not actual power. The while the Queen retains some powers, she will not, and indeed has not, used them for decades(and as far as I know, ever).The government controls the military, the queen really has nothing to do with it
Regardless of what happened in 1812, you know, and every canadian knows that NOWADAYS the US could take over canada in a matter of days. They have something like 100 jet fighters. We have THOUSANDS, that are also way more advanced. That's just ONE example.
It doesn't matter if the queen hasn't used the military, she is still head of the military of the commonwealth, which includes the silly little canadian military.
@andrewm153351 And what is the point of this? The U.S. can attack other countries? And how do you think NATO would take it if Canada invaded the U.S. . Honestly what is this stupidity.
Yes shes the head of the military, I get that. But the point you're trying to argue is is that a car (the military) is steered by the logo (the Queen), when in actuality it is steered by the government. Frankly, she makes the country look nice, something which Presidents have infinite trouble doing.
Obviously im not considering NATO you dumwit, being that the US is the leader of NATO. i was talking about IF, let me say it again, IF we went to war with canada, we would completely rape them, just like we would the uk. Obviously im not talking about scenarios in the real world, being that both countries are our allies.
The queen makes a country look better? LOL if anything it makes you look like an old stone-age country.
By the way, brits AND canadians pay taxes to the queen
@andrewm153351Frankly you sound like an idiot right now.Considering such things is a complete waste of time and I'm tired of responding to these never-going-to-happen matchups.And hint hint,the UK makes more money off of the Queen that it costs to fund her, and earns the respect (obviously not from you) and adoration the world over. How many people watched her coronation or any of the royal weddings? How many people watched Presidential inaugurations, or even the superbowl? Not nearly as many
So because people watch her coronation and weddings, that means they like her? LOL
Please, don't' even get me started on how superior American culture is to british.
And no, the entire royal family does NOT make more money for the government than what they are given. The queen might, but not the entire royal family. I can't believe that YOU believe that silly myth.
No, they watch her because she is the queen. That doesn't mean they like her. She's a stupid old ugly bitch in my opinion.
And no, considering how many royal family members get money for doing absolutely nothing from the government, they take more money than they make.
Also, all of the property is actually owned by the uk government, so the royal family isn't the one making the money, being that all of the land is actually owned by the government.
@andrewm153351 Actually they do own the Crown estate. So her family won the land through wars etc CENTURIES ago, how do you think ALL land was allotted in the past?
Are you just jealous that we have some a magnificently graceful Head of State, whos portrait is reproduced more than anyone bar Jesus? Because when she dies billions will mourn her, whereas when a US president dies its just another death? Or is it because Constitutional monarchies are more democratic than republics?
Lol you are one uneducated idiot if you think the crown owns those estates. I've read up on it. The crown does NOT own those estates. i can send you the url if you need it. The crown operates off of ALLOWANCES from the uk government.
Lol i highly doubt people would mourn the queen's death. She does absolutely nothing. The president on the other hand is the most powerful person in the world. There's a difference ;)
She does masses of charity work, her whole life is devoted to that in fact. And she represents billions of people, beautifully, she is so gracious and warm. Your presidents are often arrogant fools who spend most of their time for themself, at least they have the humility to bow to the Queen.
An American could never understand role and duty, and devoting ones entire life to a cause.
Sorry but you wouldnt. If you attacked Canada, you attack the Commonwealth and the Commonwealth would obliterate the US, unless someone was stupid to use nukes, then there would be no habitable planet left.
Canada doesnt pay any tax to the Queen, nor does any other Commonwealth member.
LOL you do realize America's military budget is equal to THE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED right? The commonwealth are mainly small countries with puny militaries.
The entire military of the commonwealth couldn't even take on the military that's based in Texas you idiot.
And yes, canada AND commonwealth members pay taxes to the queen. Besides dividends, the taxpayers pay for the estates that the queen owns in canada.
Yes but the Commonwealth has numbers and and groups in India such as the Gurkhas, and technology and training in Britain such as the SAS, to mention a couple of strong points, Money doesnt equal strength. The US has proven time and time again for the past few decades how incompetant its military is.
US uni is some of the Western worlds most expensive but the quality isnt any better.
Lol if you really think india would fight for the commonwealth, you're seriously mistaken. They are part of the SCO which is an alliance of russia and china. And SAS training isn't going to mean nothing when you're standing up against the largest air force, largest navy, etc etc.
"The US has proven time and time again for the past few decades how incompetant its military is"
No money is paid directly to the Queen only to cover the institution and visits in Canada for example. Youre just sore because the US is rated lower democratically than the UK and four Commonwealth countries.
"no money is paid directly to the Queen only to cover the institution and visits in canada" The queen is paid tens of millions of pounds you idiotic twat.
"Youre just sore because the US is rated lower democratically than the UK"
Actually we're ranked #17 and the uk is ranked #23. Need the link?. By the way, the US has a lower poverty rate, higher quality of life, higher standard of living, higher average income, and lower % of debt.
First off, york WAS the capital back then. Get YOUR facts straight. Secondly, we burned down MANY legislative buildings and even looted from you (all while winning the battle).
All the british/canadians did to our whitehouse was burn it. They didn't burn it DOWN, they only burned it.
lastly, look up the battle of york OR the battle of toronto
A people so proud that they were made up of criminals, prostitutes, and Europes failures, and the best they could do was make their leaders house a remake of a British monarchs palace.
@andrewm153351 LoL It is VERY easy to look up and find that the majority of democracies are based of the Westminster system system, due largely in part to the British colonial influence. There are dozens of Republics and Presidential systems predating the US discovery.
Also Ill add per persons income the US has the Western worlds LOWEST charity rates. The US is one of places where they think a biggest size is everything but the reality is the whole thing is as hollow as a vacuum.
No you did not and neither did I. Many countries are based off the Westminster system (are we speaking the same language?) There are few nations based off the US system.
Federations federations existed before the US and claiming other nations copied it is baseless. Although the EU is trying now.
More % of the US population give than in Europe but per persons wealth they give Very little. So your comment "the US are more charitable" doesnt ring true.
No you did not and neither did I. Many countries are based off the Westminster system (are we speaking the same language?) There are few nations based off the US system.
Federations federations existed before the US and claiming other nations copied it is baseless. Although the EU is trying now.
More % of the US population give than in Europe but per persons wealth they give Very little. So your comment "the US are more charitable" doesnt ring true.
I never said anything about being angry. Im a friend of the USA, you have a problem with the UK thats why I commented.
Judging from the fact youve never heard of the Westminster style of government its not surprising you think the US system is so copied. Westminster has been a seat of power for around 1000 years.
The Charity Giving Index is about what percentage of the population did anything, regardless of how little, per person the US gives the least in the West
Actually, the percent of people who give to charity matters way more than the amount given. It means more people give to charity in America. And that's not including the fact that our GOVERNMENT give the most money to charity as well.
You seem to be getting modern law and governing mixed up with old style theatrics. I was referring to MODERN governance. There is no denying the fact that today's democracy is directly copied from America. America was free BEFORE britain.
@andrewm153351 How was America free before Britain, our parliament dates back almost 1000 years. And Achieved complete rule over the Monarch 400 years ago. Get your history straight. No I am not mixing it up (again are we speaking the same language?) I said Government systems are messy its easier to see by law systems as these are the driving force of a country. Per person the US are the measliest for example most many European nations give near to half of what the entire US gives
LOL you think a parliament makes you free? WOW. First off, even TODAY britain's freedom of speech isn't anything close to how free America's is. For instance, that lady that was shouting racist remarks on a train in london while back got arrested for it. You can shout racist things all you want over here. Lets also not forget gun rights ;)
No, i have already proved to you that per person, America isn't "measily". We give more per person than the uk.
As we say in Europe, Britain invented freedom of speech but we understand it has limits such as Abhu Hamza, Americans are too simple to understand it and allow extremists to shit over fallen soldiers funerals. My government has no right to listen to my phone calls, no right to watch my bank actions, and no right to lock me up indefinately in Guantanamo without just cause.
Regardless, the Democracy index rates the UK as more democratic than the US so yes I am more free.
@andrewm153351 European words, not my own. Liking the US does not entail liking every idea it has. I love ikea but I think the quality it shit. Freedom of Speech should only be rarely questionned when there is a danger or complete lack of sense. The British woman was not arrested for her speech but because of her behaviour, if she had been shouting something else not racist she would stil have been in danger of being charged with disturbing the peace.
because of her behavior? Lol what nonsense. she was arrested for being racist, plain and simple.
Oh, by the way, you do realize that America was/is voted the most admired country on the planet by an INTERNATIONAL poll right? I can send the link for that as well.
@andrewm153351 Yes you can read what she was charged with, Racially Motivated Harrassment. That is behaviour not speech. I could say racist things as much as I wanted providing I dont use it to harrass people and I dont disturb the peace.
Judged by an American company, I wonder how many foreign companies would also conclude America was the "most admired".
Are you to present a new idea everytime I prove you wrong until you find one youre actually corerct about?
LOL that is absolutely wrong. She was being racist because of her SPEECH, and her OPINION. Meaning the government regulates citizens opinions over there.
"I wonder how many foreign companies would also conclude America was the "most admired"
Actually, the company that did the ratings is headed by a BRITISH man. Look it up.
Lol you haven't proven me wrong ONCE. Quite the contrary actually.
and as I said its all about "just cause" you cannot listen in and arrest people on whim, there needs to be just cause. The UK was ranked as a higher democracy in the latest ratings. I can only conclude you are not looking at the most recent or its some kind of twisted over patriotic American one. The most recent ranks the UK as 18, US 19.
Just cause? you think that doesn't apply to Americans? And do you think EVERY terrorist will give just cause? You do realize that regular every-day people become terrorists right?
"The UK was ranked as a higher democracy in the latest ratings."
Lol not in the rankings that i have. And it's funny how everytime you non-Americans get confronted with data, you merely call it patriotic and biased. Quite pathetic if you ask me.
@andrewm153351 No I have searched for several rankings and all the 2011 data I can find rates the UK as one above the US. Please enlighten me on this one that says different from all the others.
Fine, if you enjoy the government watching your bank transactions and recording your phone calls, censoring your internet thats your priority, but I prefer to have my freedom.
Theres is an expression in Europe "the US is built on paranoia"
Terrorists things happen, its impossible to avoid them without sacrificing freedom. Its risky freedom vS. Totalitarian safety. Its not as if other nations dont have problems with terrorists. I went to your page it listed the UK as 13th and the US as 15 on the Democracy Audit.
"Terrorists things happen, its impossible to avoid them without sacrificing freedom."
Completely untrue. There have probably been DOZENS of cases where thousands of people's lives have been saved due to vigorous monitoring by the government. Honestly, i would rather know im safer with the government watching me (because i have nothing to hide) than to be told what to say in public by said government.
Vigourous monitoring is sacrificing ones freedom. The UK never tells people what to say, again that women was arrested for behaviour not words, if youre so obsessed with finding racially motivated speech in the UK that is not punished go ahead, the BNP is one fine example that Im sure you will admire, a Whole government party of racists.
"The UK never tells people what to say, again that women was arrested for behaviour not words"
The woman was arrested AFTER the whole ordeal. Meaning just behavior wasn't the only thing that got her arrested. She was arrested because she spouted racist remarks to people. If someone was shouting in public in the US, then days later a video came out showing them doing it, they wouldn't be arrested after the fact. The BNP isn't remotely as racist or free-thinking as other organizations
She was arrested for harrassment, her racial abuse was directly aimed at people and that is not acceptable in any civilised society. That is behaviour and freedom of speech will not protect you for harrassment, it comes to the brink of assault.
Rich that an American would preach about freedom of the press considering the US News' obnoxiously biased nature
That's the difference here in America. You can direct your opinion to anyone you want. The government doesn't regulate what we say (for the most part).
Well apparently our news isn't as biased as yours now is it? Being that we rate better in press than you? It's allllll about freedom of speech.
Key word is abuse. Its a sad day when a country as "civilised" as the US allows abuse.
Our speech isnt regulated our actions are, and it is the same in all democracies. You cant grasp the simple fact the charge was nothing to do with the racism, the BNP are racist on a party scale they arnt arrested. Why are you so simple you cant get that simple notion through your mind?
We allow verbal "abuse" because we're very careful on what the government can make us say. Many european countries don't allow inflammatory things to be said, including britain. For instance in france and other countries, you can be arrested for simply saying the holocaust didn't happen.
Now, i have to go to Uni, so ill be back. I will be more than happy to completely own you, as i have already done, when i get back. ;)
@andrewm153351 Own me? Youve lost almost every item youve brought up and only brought more up to try and find a winning clause. Apparently the stereotype of Texans being obsessed with guns, size, and racism is not fallacy.
And in the US you can be arrested for no reason other than hear-say. Atleast in Europe we only imprison those who are in the wrong, and give them trial. Guantanamo bay is a shame on the whole of the US.
Guantanamo bay is for TERRORISTS. When you are a terrorist, you lose all of your American rights. And you do know that some of the inmates at Guantanamo were caught by british, and other intelligence agencies right?
At the end of the day, that woman was arrested for being racist. Plain and simple. Her opinion was regulated by the government.
I have already explained to you WHY our GINI is low. How are we on par with china when we have a far higher standard of living, income, etc?
@andrewm153351 Abuse is abuse, you put someone in fear of their safety you are breaking the law. Im glad I live in countries where when I feel in danger the law protects me.
For a country screaming freedom you really are lacking in it. Internet censorship, GINI on par with China, no welfare, no rights to privacy, lack of human rights. The truth of it was the settlers never left Europe for freedom of persecution, they left for the freedom to persecute. My guess is youre antigay too
God Save the Queen! :D
LilCorpJanie18 2 days ago
puke on you
Silverwolf352 6 days ago
that old dried up cunt should be shot.
SlamdogX 1 week ago
@SlamdogX Why?
TheFatmat5 1 day ago
@TheFatmat5 because her and her family have been killing and stealing from people for hundreds of years.
SlamdogX 9 hours ago
@SlamdogX It is somewhat complicated... I cannot argue with your basic statement of facts, because it is in effect true, apart from the fact ER was not directly involved, and her family has only been ruling for less than 300 years, the Hanover and Saxe-Coburg-Gotha (renamed Windsor) lines... but much of the infrastructrure put in place... ie railways, diplomacy, even culture , has remained in place and has allowed new (actually very old) peoples like India to emerge with strength.
limefrog77 2 hours ago
Go on Canada! your queen bitch wants more "charitable contributions in "our" honor." lol, Canadians. "What the hells wrong with their heads!?"
divinechaosTHC 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SO MANY SCHOOLS YET SO MANY FOOLS KNOWLEDGE IN THE HANDS OF THE WISE IS CREATIVE AND KNOWLEDGE IN THE HANDS OF THE FOOLISH IS DESTRUCTIVE TIME TO KNOW THY SELF PEACE AND LOVE
sol2soul77 1 week ago
The Horst Wessel Lied...... Very good grade 9 humour. Got anything from grade 12?
feindhortmit 1 week ago
obviously-you-do-or-i-would-not-be-responding-to-your-ridiculous-remarks-which-began-this-whole-thing-i-dont-care-about-this-issue-at-all-i-hurt-myself-skiing-in-one-of-the-most-beautiful-places-in-the-world-all-my-friends-are-in-helos-going-to-the-top-of-a-mountain-and-you-are-to-stupid-to-defend-your-own-premiss-what-about-legally-she-is-canadas-sovereign-never-mind-i-will-look-elsewhere
paul1x1 1 week ago
Off with her head!
shauntnichols 1 week ago in playlist BilderBuggers and ROTchilds'.
The face of the manipulation, brainwashing with a crown.!
spectech3000 1 week ago
us Brits love Canada :)
parasean22 2 weeks ago 10
@mcgrewrich 1867 Canada Left British Power And Became A Country. The Queen Is Just A Figure In Our Government Yet She Is Not The Final Say In It. Maybe Read Up On Your Facts Before Going All Retard On This Video.
xcars454 2 weeks ago
@xcars454
Canada finally gained independence in 1982 (Constitution Act). Prior to that there was the Balfour Declaration and the Westminster Statute which eased a very peaceful and friendly separation.
feindhortmit 1 week ago
shes-not-even-ruler-of-england-where-i-live-she-could-walk-down-the-street-and-not-a-soul-would-know-who-she-is-nor-would-they-care-if-they-were-told-monarchy-in-canada-will-die-out-without-anyone-noticing-different-head-on-the-money-who-cares
paul1x1 2 weeks ago
WTF The Nazi anthem. You fking retarded or something. God Save The Queen is British national anthem. Get a life
jakelee1991 2 weeks ago
@jakelee1991 who-cares
paul1x1 2 weeks ago
@paul1x1 I care dumbass
jakelee1991 1 week ago
the old bitch has to read from a piece of paper
SKERLOK 2 weeks ago
Canada isn't a real country, it's just a British crown colony, as the Queen of Canada delightfully gloats in this video. Tell me, Canadians, when did Canada become an independent nation and cease to be a British colony? It never did! Canada's head of state is still the Queen of England, who exercises power over Canada's Parliament through her appointed Governor-General. The Governor-General can suspend Parliament, choose which party should form a government, etc., on the Queen's behalf.
mcgrewrich 2 weeks ago
@mcgrewrich 1867
paul1x1 2 weeks ago
@mcgrewrich That is well said I couldn't agree more. I stated that very same fact Canada is a British crown colony and a corporation as well.
mrtheoriginalschool 2 weeks ago
@mcgrewrich the-govenor-general-is-a-figurehead-like-the-queen-it-would-be-a-thought-before-death-that-he-would-try-to-suspend-a-canadian-parlimentry-session-or-even-that-the-queen-would-try-to-suspend-a-parliment-of-great-brittain-she-and-her-family-are-a-joke-even-in-the-country-they-live-in-never-mind-in-canada-here-she-is-like-one-of-those-celebritties-that-nobody-can-remember-why-they-are-famous-
paul1x1 2 weeks ago
@mcgrewrich
Canada eased away from the U.K. starting with the BNA Act 1867, Balfour Declaration 1926 & the Westminster Staute 1931 and finally the Constitution Act in 1982. Technically it ceased to be a colony in 1926 and gained full independence by 1982.
The Queen, and or the Govenor General serve at Canada's request. She is not thrust upon us by London. We choose a Constitutional Monarch. It can be changed if enough Canadians wish it so.
feindhortmit 1 week ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@feindhortmit most people dont understand this and make silly bigoted comments about the Royal family while unaware that there not thrust upon anyone British Canadians and Australians chose to keep them as we value tradition and culture .
Deadeye012011 4 days ago
Canada is still a colony and a corporation under the British monarchy not a country.
mrtheoriginalschool 3 weeks ago
@mrtheoriginalschool nope
paul1x1 2 weeks ago
@paul1x1 Yes it is and it's still a corporation.
mrtheoriginalschool 2 weeks ago
@mrtheoriginalschool so-wrong-it-cant-be-explained-to-you-too-nonsensical-to-try-to-explain-google-it
paul1x1 2 weeks ago
God Save the Queen; we've got our parliament.
speedstriker 4 weeks ago
God save the Queen.
WTFBBQ5 1 month ago 6
well think of it this way; as long as queeny thinks she's the poop, it might be good for trade relations with the UK
787ram 1 month ago
Long live the Queen of Canada!
myViewQueens 1 month ago
Stupid woman XD Does she know she has lost her power?
TheJackGinger 1 month ago
@TheJackGinger you are either ignorant or retarded
SKERLOK 2 weeks ago
not many people in britain like the queen tbh
TommyGun8142 1 month ago
@TommyGun8142 and you got your source from where? your head?
mrmattusftw 1 month ago
@mrmattusftw everyone i know, i live in britain. all she does is waste tax payers money
TommyGun8142 1 month ago
@TommyGun8142 get your facts right before you come up with crap like that, we pay 70p a year in taxes to the royal family and tourism alone makes that money back and even makes money to the uk.
mrmattusftw 1 month ago
@mrmattusftw i wouldnt mind 70p a year from 60 million people
TommyGun8142 1 month ago
@TommyGun8142 I do to and he is right XD greedy old lady with no power
TheJackGinger 1 month ago
Nazi music? DISGUSTING
ThePalaeontologist 1 month ago
Comment removed
MrEasilee 1 month ago
Comment removed
andrewm153351 1 month ago
lol i don't understand why a country would be PROUD of having a foreign ruler....lol that's pretty pathetic.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 She is, and has been the world's most famous woman for near 60 years now. And in truth she does not "rule" any country, merely retains her office as the head of state. Plus, people love her. Presidents wish that had that much star power.
randomguy564 1 month ago
nice video wrecked by unpatriotic editing.
MapleBalls 1 month ago
YOU AIN'T MY QUEEN, BITCH.
WRITE THAT THE FUCK DOWN SO YOU CAN COME GET ME WHEN IT'S TIME, YOU CANNIBALISTIC INBRED PSYCHIC VAMPIRE.
beggarz 1 month ago
@beggarz Calm down dear. I think you'll strain yourself
thebigJM92 1 month ago
You'll take the greatest...that
hydra8888 1 month ago
and they applaud her ...hahahaha
914light 1 month ago
@Scottish036 that was added on at the end by the uploader... note the Nazi-German anthem to go with it... :/
Spencervs 1 month ago
why is the Nazi Germany national anthem on at the end? :/
Spencervs 1 month ago
May I enquire as to why your video has the Anthem of the German National Socialist Party (Nazi) at the end, along with an upturned Canadian flag?
Bassplayer2735 2 months ago 2
May I question the reason for the video to contain the Third Reich anthem at the ending part?
gothicfan51 2 months ago
Commonwealth brothers and sisters forever :D
andydenissmith 2 months ago 12
Why is the Canadian flag waving upside down?
wahinesurfergirl 2 months ago
@wahinesurfergirl lol wow.... that's an insult
SamuraiChick7777 2 months ago
@wahinesurfergirl the flag being upside down I mean
SamuraiChick7777 2 months ago
@SamuraiChick7777 I'm not saying it as an insult. You could literally see it on the video, that the flag was upside down. The one who created this video, did insult Canada, for putting their flag the wrong-way round.
wahinesurfergirl 2 months ago
That is good that we have a monarch. I'm happy that institution doesn't rule with absolute power
blinds88 2 months ago
God save the Queen.
God bless the Commonwealth.
codownni 2 months ago
why did the nazi national anthem come on at the end?
andyisapro 2 months ago
@andyisapro Because the real name of this fraudulent band of murderers is Saxbourg-Gotha and they are GERMAN, NOT BRITISH.
So a GERMAN 'royal' family runs England and Canada - ha ha ha ha ha you can't make this shit up!!!
Canada is a FAKE COUNTRY.
beggarz 1 month ago
She is the head of the English -speaing peoples, (ESP) who have set the standards of civilised behaviour for decades.
But for the ESP we would all be speaking Kraut or JAP, if we were allowed do speak at all!
an dont you forget it!
mmcceng77 2 months ago
@mmcceng77 Ha ha ha a german family saved us from speaking 'kraut' ha ha ha ha TOOL
beggarz 1 month ago
FREEDOM TO CANADA FROM ANGLO-BARBARIC CANCER
unfukkkmee 2 months ago
Dear Queen, We love you, Your first home-england <3
MattySP34Ks 2 months ago
FUNNY HOW U PUT THE NAZI ANTHEM ON THE BACKGROUND
sabsthebest 2 months ago
Why do you Canadians put up with your French cotingency.Why should you have to speak French inToronot or Vancouver.
bermudarailway 3 months ago
@bermudarailway because the french lived their before the british
TranceExplosion 2 months ago
@bermudarailway And contributed not alot, the french, a nation of cowards as can be seen right now sucking up to the Germans in the EU,after being taken over in WW2.As General Patton said "I would rather have a German division in front of me than a french one behind me ."
bermudarailway 2 months ago
we let you win... you were beginning to drag us behind, wait... even after the war the white guys that we left over there were still... well not to be racist but you see where this is going, dont you!
MrSquirrelsTV 3 months ago
@Jakeakdreday she is possessed
DerBotoxPapst 3 months ago
@Jakeakdreday because canada has to languages and shes playing to both
deadeyetheclown 3 months ago
Stinky bitch, I can smell the fish through my computer.
Riccoh21 3 months ago
@Riccoh21 xD!!!!!!!!!!!! Prince William is gonna kick your ass
ItalianBlackheart123 3 months ago
Always taking...never giving.....
88MPJ 3 months ago
I wonder what this return is about.
Queen signed herself off of our rights and responsibility 29 years ago.
The queen hasnt been un rule of Canada for 29 years now.
First Citizen In Right of Canada for 20 years now.
FCIRCanada 4 months ago
@FCIRCanada We have been stock on her tax the whole time, the rest is misdirection providing an illusion of freedom.
Dehzee 2 months ago
Canada is not more wealthy than great britain that's way your military bay second hand equipment from the uk and britain is one of the largest forces on the ground in afghanistan and britain is building the two largest aircraft carriers in the world with the most advanced air craft and London is the trading capital of the west.
MrAndrew941 4 months ago
this woman is an imposter, she is in place without officially being crowned
nethy02 5 months ago
we are more wealthy than they why should we alow this nonsense to continue monarchys are dead old blood lines are watered down no one can truly say they are one specific race or of complete royal decent i as a member of a unconquered native race the cree would never bow to any monarchy as of much as our government which is ever falling from its grace as a peoples government and more turning into a buisness for the elite we have more resources and natural land than any other country
immortalchief21 5 months ago
i already knew she's tha queen of canada she reminds mie of my grandma:-)
steve154life 5 months ago
Behehehehe
batsondceiling 5 months ago
sheep!!!
Dadge42 5 months ago
so much hate in the comments. so what steps have you ppl taken against this "dictatorship" besides youtube comments?
kamillark 6 months ago
believe me.... she spread her legs much in her day!!!
normheil 10 months ago
@eclipsed1001 oh well,, i'm going to the garden to eat worms...
pamaspamas 10 months ago
CANADA HATES YOU!!!!
This evil lizard is the HEAD of the CORPORATION called CANADA.
Check the Security and Exchange commission website..this troll Claims to OWN ALL OF US!!!
overlogg 10 months ago
@overlogg She is the head of Canada and America. America Is Still A British Colony
LLOYD19851012 4 months ago 13
Treaty of Paris (1783) Article 1.
oatmeal964 3 months ago
@LLOYD19851012 Bullshit.
BasilFawlty4444 3 months ago
@LLOYD19851012 No there not they rebeled and the French, Spanish and The Netherlands backed them up kicking are arses into Canada but they were still unable to defeat us in Canada.
1tjos 3 months ago
@LLOYD19851012 Naw the americans kicked there ass's for freedom.
darksword793 3 months ago
@LLOYD19851012 The US WAS (past tense) colonized by the British a long time ago, but no longer, since they've gained independence from the UK in 1776.
wahinesurfergirl 2 months ago
@LLOYD19851012 not the USA isnt still a British colony
MrAverageRetro 2 months ago
@MrAverageRetro it is
iSorrowproductions 2 months ago
@iSorrowproductions nope its not we won the Revolutionary war
MrAverageRetro 2 months ago
@MrAverageRetro /watch?v=D47-8b8BrkA&feature=related
Nope.
iSorrowproductions 2 months ago
@iSorrowproductions nope your wrong sorry go back to school
MrAverageRetro 2 months ago
@MrAverageRetro I think you're in denial here child
iSorrowproductions 2 months ago
@iSorrowproductions sorry to hear how you failed history class your wrong
MrAverageRetro 2 months ago
@MrAverageRetro Its nice to see you failed your common sense class.
iSorrowproductions 2 months ago
@iSorrowproductions its nice to see you failed history class please go back to elementary school
MrAverageRetro 2 months ago
@MrAverageRetro You already said that one, keep up kid.
iSorrowproductions 2 months ago
@iSorrowproductions Like I said go back to history class maybe you might learn or you know looks at The Bill of Rights, Deceleration of Independence or The Constitution
MrAverageRetro 2 months ago
Comment removed
iSorrowproductions 2 months ago
@iSorrowproductions its pretty funny how much about how we won The Revolution and and the war of 1812 that they dont teach you about over your pretty stupid to say if you took history in any other country you would fail oh wait my bad you failed it over there to
MrAverageRetro 2 months ago
@MrAverageRetro You lost the war of 1812?
You invaded Canada and got your capital burned to the ground and lost all northern territory...
American education system at its finest
iSorrowproductions 2 months ago
@iSorrowproductions You lost I find it funny that mother nature won us the battle and we re built dumbass the White House got burned not the Capital Building tard
MrAverageRetro 2 months ago
@MrAverageRetro Mother natutre won you the battle that you lost?
You do understand that the whole capital was burned right?
And America ceded all territory to Britain?
I seriously hope you don't think America won the war of 1812 because a storm killed 3 british troops...
iSorrowproductions 2 months ago 4
@iSorrowproductions
Do you know WHY our whitehouse was burned? Because days before WE went into toronto (then called yorktown) and burned the ENTIRE CITY down, including many parliament buildings, and even looted from the whole town
It's so funny how your history books never teach you this fact.
And the war of 1812 was a draw. BOTH sides didn't get what they wanted. Canada and the uk wanted sole authority of the great lakes, which they didn't get, and many other things
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 You know the U.S. has tried to invade Canada, or had plans to invade Canada, several times in its history. It did not succeed any of the times.
randomguy564 1 month ago
@randomguy564
First of the ONLY time we actually tried to invade canada was in the war of 1812. All of those other times were plans for war in case war broke out between us. That didn't mean we were planning to invade.
And nobody won the war of 1812. Canada wasn't even a country then.
Also, Obama is the most important and powerful human being on the planet. EVERYONE wishes they had his power.
And the queen controls the commonwealth's military, so yeah, she rules you.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 Mate, I know that, I grew up in California since I was 4. I have taken U.S. history enough times (including Advanced Placement). I do not say anyone won the war of 1812.I merely said that the U.S. did not succeed in conquering Canada. And I said star power, not actual power. The while the Queen retains some powers, she will not, and indeed has not, used them for decades(and as far as I know, ever).The government controls the military, the queen really has nothing to do with it
randomguy564 1 month ago
@randomguy564
Regardless of what happened in 1812, you know, and every canadian knows that NOWADAYS the US could take over canada in a matter of days. They have something like 100 jet fighters. We have THOUSANDS, that are also way more advanced. That's just ONE example.
It doesn't matter if the queen hasn't used the military, she is still head of the military of the commonwealth, which includes the silly little canadian military.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 And what is the point of this? The U.S. can attack other countries? And how do you think NATO would take it if Canada invaded the U.S. . Honestly what is this stupidity.
Yes shes the head of the military, I get that. But the point you're trying to argue is is that a car (the military) is steered by the logo (the Queen), when in actuality it is steered by the government. Frankly, she makes the country look nice, something which Presidents have infinite trouble doing.
randomguy564 1 month ago
@randomguy564
Obviously im not considering NATO you dumwit, being that the US is the leader of NATO. i was talking about IF, let me say it again, IF we went to war with canada, we would completely rape them, just like we would the uk. Obviously im not talking about scenarios in the real world, being that both countries are our allies.
The queen makes a country look better? LOL if anything it makes you look like an old stone-age country.
By the way, brits AND canadians pay taxes to the queen
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351Frankly you sound like an idiot right now.Considering such things is a complete waste of time and I'm tired of responding to these never-going-to-happen matchups.And hint hint,the UK makes more money off of the Queen that it costs to fund her, and earns the respect (obviously not from you) and adoration the world over. How many people watched her coronation or any of the royal weddings? How many people watched Presidential inaugurations, or even the superbowl? Not nearly as many
randomguy564 1 month ago
@randomguy564
So because people watch her coronation and weddings, that means they like her? LOL
Please, don't' even get me started on how superior American culture is to british.
And no, the entire royal family does NOT make more money for the government than what they are given. The queen might, but not the entire royal family. I can't believe that YOU believe that silly myth.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 No, they watch it because the hate her obviously -_- .
And trying to argue cultural superiority for ANY country simply announces your ignorance, keep that one to yourself mate ;)
And yes they do, consider how many people go to see the estates and assets of the British monarchy. Look it up
And I'm not going to respond anymore because, quite frankly, I have better things to do that argue with blind and stubborn people on the internet.
randomguy564 1 month ago
@randomguy564
No, they watch her because she is the queen. That doesn't mean they like her. She's a stupid old ugly bitch in my opinion.
And no, considering how many royal family members get money for doing absolutely nothing from the government, they take more money than they make.
Also, all of the property is actually owned by the uk government, so the royal family isn't the one making the money, being that all of the land is actually owned by the government.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 Actually they do own the Crown estate. So her family won the land through wars etc CENTURIES ago, how do you think ALL land was allotted in the past?
Are you just jealous that we have some a magnificently graceful Head of State, whos portrait is reproduced more than anyone bar Jesus? Because when she dies billions will mourn her, whereas when a US president dies its just another death? Or is it because Constitutional monarchies are more democratic than republics?
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
continued-
Lol you are one uneducated idiot if you think the crown owns those estates. I've read up on it. The crown does NOT own those estates. i can send you the url if you need it. The crown operates off of ALLOWANCES from the uk government.
Lol i highly doubt people would mourn the queen's death. She does absolutely nothing. The president on the other hand is the most powerful person in the world. There's a difference ;)
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
She does masses of charity work, her whole life is devoted to that in fact. And she represents billions of people, beautifully, she is so gracious and warm. Your presidents are often arrogant fools who spend most of their time for themself, at least they have the humility to bow to the Queen.
An American could never understand role and duty, and devoting ones entire life to a cause.
animesis 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
Sorry but you wouldnt. If you attacked Canada, you attack the Commonwealth and the Commonwealth would obliterate the US, unless someone was stupid to use nukes, then there would be no habitable planet left.
Canada doesnt pay any tax to the Queen, nor does any other Commonwealth member.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
"and the Commonwealth would obliterate the US"
LOL you do realize America's military budget is equal to THE REST OF THE WORLD COMBINED right? The commonwealth are mainly small countries with puny militaries.
The entire military of the commonwealth couldn't even take on the military that's based in Texas you idiot.
And yes, canada AND commonwealth members pay taxes to the queen. Besides dividends, the taxpayers pay for the estates that the queen owns in canada.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
Yes but the Commonwealth has numbers and and groups in India such as the Gurkhas, and technology and training in Britain such as the SAS, to mention a couple of strong points, Money doesnt equal strength. The US has proven time and time again for the past few decades how incompetant its military is.
US uni is some of the Western worlds most expensive but the quality isnt any better.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
Lol if you really think india would fight for the commonwealth, you're seriously mistaken. They are part of the SCO which is an alliance of russia and china. And SAS training isn't going to mean nothing when you're standing up against the largest air force, largest navy, etc etc.
"The US has proven time and time again for the past few decades how incompetant its military is"
Give me some examples.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
No money is paid directly to the Queen only to cover the institution and visits in Canada for example. Youre just sore because the US is rated lower democratically than the UK and four Commonwealth countries.
animesis 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@animesis
continued-
"no money is paid directly to the Queen only to cover the institution and visits in canada" The queen is paid tens of millions of pounds you idiotic twat.
"Youre just sore because the US is rated lower democratically than the UK"
Actually we're ranked #17 and the uk is ranked #23. Need the link?. By the way, the US has a lower poverty rate, higher quality of life, higher standard of living, higher average income, and lower % of debt.
So WHY would i be jealous again?
andrewm153351 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@iSorrowproductions
First off, york WAS the capital back then. Get YOUR facts straight. Secondly, we burned down MANY legislative buildings and even looted from you (all while winning the battle).
All the british/canadians did to our whitehouse was burn it. They didn't burn it DOWN, they only burned it.
lastly, look up the battle of york OR the battle of toronto
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
A people so proud that they were made up of criminals, prostitutes, and Europes failures, and the best they could do was make their leaders house a remake of a British monarchs palace.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
continued-
Remake of british monarchs palace? Sorry but American-style democracy was copied by nearly the entire modern world.
Doesn't matter if our presidents are fools, they're still 100x more powerful than the queen, or anyone in britain for that matter.
So Americans don't understand devoting ones life to a cause? So can you please explain why the US has a higher charity rate than the uk?
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 LoL It is VERY easy to look up and find that the majority of democracies are based of the Westminster system system, due largely in part to the British colonial influence. There are dozens of Republics and Presidential systems predating the US discovery.
Also Ill add per persons income the US has the Western worlds LOWEST charity rates. The US is one of places where they think a biggest size is everything but the reality is the whole thing is as hollow as a vacuum.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
"majority of democracies are based of the Westminster system"
In a very vague way. The standard democratic structure of today's world governments are almost directly copied off of the American system however.
I didn't say America invented democracy or republics you idiot, but our TYPE of democracy is copied. Can you read that?
And actually, no i can send you a source showing that America does more charity than the uk percent wise. Would you like for me to send it to you?
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
No you did not and neither did I. Many countries are based off the Westminster system (are we speaking the same language?) There are few nations based off the US system.
Federations federations existed before the US and claiming other nations copied it is baseless. Although the EU is trying now.
More % of the US population give than in Europe but per persons wealth they give Very little. So your comment "the US are more charitable" doesnt ring true.
animesis 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
No you did not and neither did I. Many countries are based off the Westminster system (are we speaking the same language?) There are few nations based off the US system.
Federations federations existed before the US and claiming other nations copied it is baseless. Although the EU is trying now.
More % of the US population give than in Europe but per persons wealth they give Very little. So your comment "the US are more charitable" doesnt ring true.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
The system that i use is the world giving index, which is much more used than the "westminister system" that i've never even heard of.
Lol you can't get angry at the US for being the richest. We still give the most money as a % of population.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
I never said anything about being angry. Im a friend of the USA, you have a problem with the UK thats why I commented.
Judging from the fact youve never heard of the Westminster style of government its not surprising you think the US system is so copied. Westminster has been a seat of power for around 1000 years.
The Charity Giving Index is about what percentage of the population did anything, regardless of how little, per person the US gives the least in the West
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
Actually, the percent of people who give to charity matters way more than the amount given. It means more people give to charity in America. And that's not including the fact that our GOVERNMENT give the most money to charity as well.
You seem to be getting modern law and governing mixed up with old style theatrics. I was referring to MODERN governance. There is no denying the fact that today's democracy is directly copied from America. America was free BEFORE britain.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 How was America free before Britain, our parliament dates back almost 1000 years. And Achieved complete rule over the Monarch 400 years ago. Get your history straight. No I am not mixing it up (again are we speaking the same language?) I said Government systems are messy its easier to see by law systems as these are the driving force of a country. Per person the US are the measliest for example most many European nations give near to half of what the entire US gives
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
LOL you think a parliament makes you free? WOW. First off, even TODAY britain's freedom of speech isn't anything close to how free America's is. For instance, that lady that was shouting racist remarks on a train in london while back got arrested for it. You can shout racist things all you want over here. Lets also not forget gun rights ;)
No, i have already proved to you that per person, America isn't "measily". We give more per person than the uk.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm
As we say in Europe, Britain invented freedom of speech but we understand it has limits such as Abhu Hamza, Americans are too simple to understand it and allow extremists to shit over fallen soldiers funerals. My government has no right to listen to my phone calls, no right to watch my bank actions, and no right to lock me up indefinately in Guantanamo without just cause.
Regardless, the Democracy index rates the UK as more democratic than the US so yes I am more free.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
"too simple to understand it"
But i thought you like the USA? lol let's hear the excuses roll in...
Freedom of speech should have no bars, because it's never good when the government can tell you what to say and what not to say.
You act like it's ok to be able to use the phone freely if you're a terrorist, but it's bad to "shit on" a soldier's funeral.
And no, i have already told you, according to worldaudit(.)org, the uk DOESN'T have a better democracy. Do you need the link?
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 European words, not my own. Liking the US does not entail liking every idea it has. I love ikea but I think the quality it shit. Freedom of Speech should only be rarely questionned when there is a danger or complete lack of sense. The British woman was not arrested for her speech but because of her behaviour, if she had been shouting something else not racist she would stil have been in danger of being charged with disturbing the peace.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
because of her behavior? Lol what nonsense. she was arrested for being racist, plain and simple.
Oh, by the way, you do realize that America was/is voted the most admired country on the planet by an INTERNATIONAL poll right? I can send the link for that as well.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 Yes you can read what she was charged with, Racially Motivated Harrassment. That is behaviour not speech. I could say racist things as much as I wanted providing I dont use it to harrass people and I dont disturb the peace.
Judged by an American company, I wonder how many foreign companies would also conclude America was the "most admired".
Are you to present a new idea everytime I prove you wrong until you find one youre actually corerct about?
animesis 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@animesis
"That is behaviour not speech"
LOL that is absolutely wrong. She was being racist because of her SPEECH, and her OPINION. Meaning the government regulates citizens opinions over there.
"I wonder how many foreign companies would also conclude America was the "most admired"
Actually, the company that did the ratings is headed by a BRITISH man. Look it up.
Lol you haven't proven me wrong ONCE. Quite the contrary actually.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
and as I said its all about "just cause" you cannot listen in and arrest people on whim, there needs to be just cause. The UK was ranked as a higher democracy in the latest ratings. I can only conclude you are not looking at the most recent or its some kind of twisted over patriotic American one. The most recent ranks the UK as 18, US 19.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
"you cannot listen in and arrest people on whim"
Just cause? you think that doesn't apply to Americans? And do you think EVERY terrorist will give just cause? You do realize that regular every-day people become terrorists right?
"The UK was ranked as a higher democracy in the latest ratings."
Lol not in the rankings that i have. And it's funny how everytime you non-Americans get confronted with data, you merely call it patriotic and biased. Quite pathetic if you ask me.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 No I have searched for several rankings and all the 2011 data I can find rates the UK as one above the US. Please enlighten me on this one that says different from all the others.
Fine, if you enjoy the government watching your bank transactions and recording your phone calls, censoring your internet thats your priority, but I prefer to have my freedom.
Theres is an expression in Europe "the US is built on paranoia"
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
google "Press Freedom survey on 186 countries".
Us is built on paranoia? Lol yeah as if 9/11 never happened.....
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
Terrorists things happen, its impossible to avoid them without sacrificing freedom. Its risky freedom vS. Totalitarian safety. Its not as if other nations dont have problems with terrorists. I went to your page it listed the UK as 13th and the US as 15 on the Democracy Audit.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
"Terrorists things happen, its impossible to avoid them without sacrificing freedom."
Completely untrue. There have probably been DOZENS of cases where thousands of people's lives have been saved due to vigorous monitoring by the government. Honestly, i would rather know im safer with the government watching me (because i have nothing to hide) than to be told what to say in public by said government.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
Vigourous monitoring is sacrificing ones freedom. The UK never tells people what to say, again that women was arrested for behaviour not words, if youre so obsessed with finding racially motivated speech in the UK that is not punished go ahead, the BNP is one fine example that Im sure you will admire, a Whole government party of racists.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
"The UK never tells people what to say, again that women was arrested for behaviour not words"
The woman was arrested AFTER the whole ordeal. Meaning just behavior wasn't the only thing that got her arrested. She was arrested because she spouted racist remarks to people. If someone was shouting in public in the US, then days later a video came out showing them doing it, they wouldn't be arrested after the fact. The BNP isn't remotely as racist or free-thinking as other organizations
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
She was arrested for harrassment, her racial abuse was directly aimed at people and that is not acceptable in any civilised society. That is behaviour and freedom of speech will not protect you for harrassment, it comes to the brink of assault.
Rich that an American would preach about freedom of the press considering the US News' obnoxiously biased nature
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
"her racial abuse was directly aimed at people"
That's the difference here in America. You can direct your opinion to anyone you want. The government doesn't regulate what we say (for the most part).
Well apparently our news isn't as biased as yours now is it? Being that we rate better in press than you? It's allllll about freedom of speech.
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351
Key word is abuse. Its a sad day when a country as "civilised" as the US allows abuse.
Our speech isnt regulated our actions are, and it is the same in all democracies. You cant grasp the simple fact the charge was nothing to do with the racism, the BNP are racist on a party scale they arnt arrested. Why are you so simple you cant get that simple notion through your mind?
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
We allow verbal "abuse" because we're very careful on what the government can make us say. Many european countries don't allow inflammatory things to be said, including britain. For instance in france and other countries, you can be arrested for simply saying the holocaust didn't happen.
Now, i have to go to Uni, so ill be back. I will be more than happy to completely own you, as i have already done, when i get back. ;)
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 Own me? Youve lost almost every item youve brought up and only brought more up to try and find a winning clause. Apparently the stereotype of Texans being obsessed with guns, size, and racism is not fallacy.
And in the US you can be arrested for no reason other than hear-say. Atleast in Europe we only imprison those who are in the wrong, and give them trial. Guantanamo bay is a shame on the whole of the US.
animesis 1 month ago
@animesis
Guantanamo bay is for TERRORISTS. When you are a terrorist, you lose all of your American rights. And you do know that some of the inmates at Guantanamo were caught by british, and other intelligence agencies right?
At the end of the day, that woman was arrested for being racist. Plain and simple. Her opinion was regulated by the government.
I have already explained to you WHY our GINI is low. How are we on par with china when we have a far higher standard of living, income, etc?
andrewm153351 1 month ago
@andrewm153351 Abuse is abuse, you put someone in fear of their safety you are breaking the law. Im glad I live in countries where when I feel in danger the law protects me.
For a country screaming freedom you really are lacking in it. Internet censorship, GINI on par with China, no welfare, no rights to privacy, lack of human rights. The truth of it was the settlers never left Europe for freedom of persecution, they left for the freedom to persecute. My guess is youre antigay too
animesis 1 month ago