this is gobbledygook to the average person. Would you please explain in simple terms what the hell is going on here? Is this thing running on its own without any electrical source or what? If so , wouldn't it be a novel idea to actually mention that here?
its a scam... all its doing to continuing the load with reduced resistance. and he turns it off b4 it looses the load. example, if an ice skater is spinning and then she pulls here arms in, she starts to spin faster. but as with this engine, she will eventually start to slow down. he just makes sure to turn it off b4 that happens.
Since the device has no output (the coils are either shorted or open), any power it generates has to be fed back to the motor driving it. So simply remove the device and see if the motor speeds up! If the motor runs faster without the device than it does with the device and the switches closed, then it's safe to conclude that it is a net power drain. But if the motor runs slower, then you might begin to argue that it's doing something useful.
Free energy has been here for a while ,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Find the real deal, a free energy device at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,take part in the revolution!
This is hilarious, I just figured out why his observations contradict what should be happening. It's quite obvious, when he flips the switches thinking he's shorting the coils he's actually opening the circuit and when he flips it back and says he's opening the circuit he's actually shorting it. LOL. Amazing what a simple little error can cause.
rambling to one who knows nothing...enlightenment to the rest of us...this guy has discovered somehting great...we need to listen to every word he says...
lol, hysteresis, faradays law, and kirchkoffs first law. he turns off the coils, more current for the motor, hence it accelerates, the reason why you cant see the current to the motor in the demo. if it was powered magnetically, which of course it cannot be, hyteresis in steel, magnetic fields dont need matter to be 'transmitted', the coils are in the wrong orientation to the magnets on the generator, Lorentz's law. its a F A K E.
I think it is an magnetic osillating effect that has to do with the speed of the magnetic propogation. The speed of the magnetic propogation is not a parameter normally associated with anything is electricity and magnetism. Thus the inability of the MIT professors to explain.
if that was true, wouldn't it have a positive net energy output? where is energy lost? i would really like to see an explanation of this with an = sign in it.
certainly imaginative, a double helix wont create an inverse vortex though, it would create an emf and mag field opposing the 'initiator coil, if one were powered and the other not, perhaps if there were no resistance, and superconductors didnt loose superconductivity in high fields, then it just might have produced a perpetual motion machine of the third kind, no free energy though.
if the coils are switched on, ie a circuit, then they will produce a resistive force on the motor. when they are switched off, ie a loose wire, there is no effect on the rotor, ie no varying magnetic field is being producedby the coils to cancel the changing magnetic field the rotor is producing through the coils, hence the motors work is no longer being resisted. there is no free energy in this device, infact i urge you to try it yourself. You will not get free energy from a mechanical system.
The electric field is comprised of light and heavy mass components. The light mass (Fermions) undergo acceleration that produces a relativistic shift in the clock rate of the particle.
When the electric field is separated the heavy particles (Bosons) attempt to torque, and the 'Static field" is engaged and pours energy into the system.
The over unity energy is being extracted from the inertial fields of the planet, which are the zero point or static fields.
Place the coils as close to the motor as possible, and try to find the perfect number of winding in the coil to match the motor coils. Do you think this would have an ant effect?
Theres not much special about this, try a demo with a dual channel scope, Ch1: field coil(s), Ch2:Induction (generator)coil(s), the phase and magnitude of your claims will be VISIBLE. ......
Ah, thats what I was going to say, they are introducing power from the coils that make the motor run faster. I forget the rule for the reason why the motor slows down with the resistance build up on the coils, but Im sure that someone will know.
I suggest he gets a better speaker to explain what he's doing. Too many "ums", "ers", "ahs" and missed or cut words and just general monotony made the explanations quite difficult to follow.
How is this a generator if it only increases in speed when the coils are shorted out? Where's the output power tapped from? And why is he talking about 'back emf in the air gap'? I thought back-EMF was a voltage, induced in a coil by an electromagnetic field working against the current that created it.
Possible free energy from magnetic motor is,that must be inductor coil (non ferro,without core) between permanent magnets to minimize attraction or repulsion between permanent magnets.And I never seen on internet electromagnetic motor,were inductor coil is between permanent magnets.
YOu're right, it's resonance, but it's not something new. We just overlook it (I think on purpose). Factories have the ability to minimize jerking due to magnets in generators, but they left it really unbalance on purpose (and most motor u see use coils, ask yourself why). Someone hide the fact from the world all these time. It's not new Physics, it's a new era of treating each other. Myer guy use resonance to break water, magnet motor use resonance to self accelerate, now this. Wake up.
please do correct me if im wrong i dont know much about electronics but from what it looks like to me is he's just using the motor to increace rpm to begin with then just switching to the magnetic thing to up the rpm even more but as soon as you introduce resistance it just slows down so all he's doing is creating alot of potential energy then wasting it.
anyone feel free to explain where the energy is saved.
its kind of hard to understand for me too, but i think the phenomenon that hes trying to show is the increase and acceleration of rotation, run on the back emf. you could use the acceleration to generate electricity and such.
i should wait until after this demo, but from part 1 and 2 it just looks like he induced an electromagnetic field in one direction to stop turning and then reversed polarity to accelerate.
I don't think it's toping out. He is afraid of it coming apart. If this is truly whats implied lower the input voltage on the motor as it starts to rise in rpms. If it can do this it should run on it own after establishing a weak force field. Use a liner gen instead and feed the shaft.
Why would be a billionaire? By simply saying perpetual motion he loses all credibility and absolutely no one, education or commercial would be willing to help.
Therefore he would be lucky to get anyone else, other than Markus Zahn, to look at this machine. Trust me on this. Markus Zahn will distance himself very very far from this machine.
I'm not so great with physics but.. This reminds me of when a spinning ice skater can control their speed of rotation by how much they retract their limbs. Maybe this is somehow similar... Maybe feeding the back EMF into the motor makes the rotations more efficient, and instead of jumping to a higher speed instantly and then gradually losing speed, the system reacts slowly so that you can visibly see the acceleration, therefore producing the illusion that energy is coming from nowhere..
This is retarded. If this guy created a generator that violates the law of conservation of energy, he wouldn't be making stupid videos on YouTube. He'd be a billionaire.
I'm no expert on this stuff, but usually when I hear about these gadgets it turns out that they are basically running on the potential energy of one or more magnets. Then the magnets will eventually de-magnetize, and the energy required to re-magnetize them exceeds the energy that was supplied. So before I consider this as anything special, I'd want to see a demonstration that shows more energy being supplied than exists in the potential energy of the magnets themselves.
So, IF the magnets' power does last 100 years.. and we can harness their power today (perhaps, soon), do we really need to find out the answer to your questions about how much energy it took to create the magnets' energy?
2. Regarding you statement about wanting to see a demonstration...
It'll be a long time before you see anything a great value.
Why?
They ARE NOT going to be manufactured & sold at WalMart, HomeDepot, etc, where you buy a take-home appliance
Evidently, he's one of those people who does NOT respond, it seems, on these pages.
I DID receive an email from a guy who HAS built machines that are C.O.P. >1...
and he taught me a lot of cool stuff!!
the terms 'perpetual motion' is a term that, as I understand it, a real scientist/engineer will not use.
Even the term 'over unity' does NOT sit well with the inventor/discoverers I have talked to... but for the spamming of "Stephan, come to over-unity dot com to discuss further"!!
Wow this really made a huge improvement to the efficiency of the electric motor!!!Cool!!! I hope the aliens that Mr. Bush control do not leave him with an anal probe. because i want this in my power wheel chair when i grow old.
Nevermind if he goes missing, we saw enough to believe that this is possible and to build another one. Pandora's Box is open, Free energy is on the way. This YouTube video is his protection. If he goes missing we'll know it's really real and someone wants to supress it.
When coils are shorted it creates "impedance mismatch" between source and load resulting in load reflecting virtually all the power back into the source which channels it back to motor via ferrous material in coupler - which induces the acceleration. The spinning wheel becomes an energy STORAGE device storing more and more kinetic energy as it spins faster with no way to dissipate it. Will continue until centrifugal forces tear it apart.
The device is not PRODUCING energy. It is STORING it!
alright im really interested in this and im already thinking on ways to improve on the system to better harness the electro magnetism but at the end of the video with the calculations chart i got a bit caught up how do you have current in a low voltage/ground and high voltage with no current theres a ratio no matter what transformer you have voltage with no current and current without voltage doesnt make scence does it? if im wrong could someone explain?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
When he's at the claimed 60 RPM, it does not sound like his wheel is spinning at 1 revolution per second. So maybe his tach is inaccurate... which leads me to wonder... what else is as inaccurate?
I'm confused because the motor involved is supposedly an AC induction motor. I thought these had to be fed with a specific frequency, and they would try to spin at that frequency. So I'm not sure how the acceleration affects the motor's ... spinning.
No doubt about it! This is a good technical series to watch over a few times because it is a good thought provoking technical demonstration. Looking at all the comments posted in all the various parts, it certainly has 'generated' plenty of pros and cons amongst all the 'experts'.
It is a good test to hire physicists if they are able to pinpoint the errors !!
A basic electomagnet brake, like used in trucks, trains like TGV.
When you change the coils connections, you increases or decreases the brake. He does not show the speed with no iron of the coils in front of the rotating magnets. A proof is that this free speed is higher than any others.
It would more convincing showing his lawnmover cutting grass with no power cord or battery !!
This system is currently being looked at with scrutiny by Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Markus Zahn. He has high hopes for the invention and wonders why people haven't invented this 1 million times over the years. It seems so simple to him but the professor is looking more closely
I agree with you on this one. it's possible that if he has managed to use the magnetic field induced in the coil(s) to increase the magnetic field in the driving motor, he might increase the efficiancy of the system, but it is never going to put out more power then it is using.
You guys actually think that the comment saying "photoshopped" was serious? More like are you guys who downvoted it and are making fun of this guy actually serious!?
"Have you ever even used photoshop?" - I ask, have you ever even used the internet? "Photoshopped" is a claim made on many popular forums as a joke in reference to the original post.
Seriously, you guys, lurk moar; its clearly a joke.
Oh, also, the video was cool; something like this deserves at least some attention.
It's not difficult to understand. Everyone who understands generators knows about back EMF. You have to ground the coil on your car engine or it will blow up. The difficult part to figure out is how to harness this power, because back EMF is a brief spike in reverse voltage. This machine here seems to do the trick. It's difficult to prove in this model, as you can see, because one would assume that the coils are just slowing down the motor, and shorting out the coil would reduce the effect.
I was actually referring to my other post about the steel core. The example without the steel core showed that the mechanism was running at a normal rpm, then stopped when the coil was shorted. According to your steel-core theory, it should have accelerated, because there was no core to interfere with the magnets, no?
I would have to watch the two clips again to comment properly and it is getting late here.
From what I saw the jist of the two clips is that shorting out the coils reduces the load on the motor and open-circuiting them increases the load on the motor, and I am pretty confident in my explanation. A lot of what he says in the clip tends towards gibberish, so that's my take on it.
I'd like to believe that Retrosurf's explanation makes sense, because in a way it does. The load taken off the motor would cause it to speed up.
But the rate of acceleration seems much slower than it would be in that case. It rises 1 rpm every 2-3 seconds or so, which seems wrong for a motor that has just lost 4 loads. It's too slow.
If you were to quarter a car's weight, you'd see an immensely significant difference in it's acceleration, not a slight one.
It looks to me like they have everything backwards. I am not exactly sure what he means when he says "shorting out the coil induces back EMF into the air gap", that makes no sense to me. What air gap? He also implies that a shorted coil somehow gives the motor more magnetizing current. How, pray tell? The coil is shorted unto itself!
None the less, he is what I think the crux of the problem is:
When he shorts out a coil he REDUCES the mechanical drag on the motor. That's because the coils is now just rushing current back and forth, with no voltage. Current times zero voltage gives you near-zero power dissipated in the shorted out coil. Hence the coil is not creating any magnetic repulsion when the rotor magnets pass by. There is no power transfer into the coil, hence no mechanical resistance. The coil effectively 'disappears' as a mechanical load on the induction motor.
On the other hand, when the coil is open-circuited, there is no current flowing, and the coil also 'disappears' as a mechanical load because there is no power dissipated in the coil, just like I said for the short-circuit setup.
However, now the ferromagnetic iron core of the coil is creating mechanical resistance. When the stator magnets fly by they induce eddy currents into the coil. The eddy currents are dissipating power in the ferromagnetic iron core itself, i.e.' a load!
OOPS: "When the stator magnets fly by they induce eddy currents into the coil." SHOULD READ "When the stator magnets fly by they induce eddy currents into the ferromagnetic iron core."
Because power is being dissipated in the iron cores themselves, the iron cores slowly heat up as the motor turns.
Thus the induction motor slows down when the coils are open-circuited because some power is going into heating up the ferromagnetic cores.
FINALLY, instead of short-circuiting or open-circuiting the coils, if he put four two-watt 100-ohm resistors across each coil, the induction motor would slow down much faster, because finally we are approaching an 'impedance match' where the coil back EMF is finally going into a REAL LOAD. The resistors would dissipate much more power than the eddy current power dissipation in the iron rods, and that would be the end of the experiment!
One last point because I know that somebody is going to ask the question: When the coils are shorted out, yes indeed, there are no more eddy currents in the ferromagnetic iron cores. That's because the outer coil has current rushing back and forth through it, canceling out the magnetic filed from the moving stator magnets, for a net zero changing magnetic field in the iron cores themselves.
Again, these well-intentioned (I hope!) guys are just duping themselves here.
please see Drevnoobes scintillating reply to the question of WHY physics student regularly perform such experiments if it(perpetual motion) is an impossibility?
Quite the opposite, in fact. I notice that you didn't mention (unless I missed it in your extravagant explanations) the differences shown when the steel bar was either removed or placed in (as shown in parts 1 and 2). The motor stopped due to the laod of the coil in part 1. Yet in part 2, it spead up.
I think this might be contrary to my earlier post, but I believe that "shorting out" the coils doesn't remove the load, it creates it.
Thus, in fact, part 2 shows that the load actually works as the opposite it should, speeding up the process instead of slowing it down.
Personally, I only have a high school knowledge of physics, and some of these terms are beyond me, but I can get the gist of it. I'm not convinced it's false yet.
Also, he brought this to Markus Zahn, a valued professor at MIT. If he hasn't figured it out yet, I doubt anyone here has.
"Speeding up" is a misnomer. You must remember that we are looking at a powered electric motor that "speeds up" because in one way or another, you have reduced the mechanical load on it. That's what is supposed to happen. Do it in 'reverse' (the correct way).... The motor slows down when you add a load to it. Wow.
I have a home backup AC generator and when it has a load plugged in, you can't even pull the starter cord on the engine. Disconnect the load and you can crank it and start it.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Constructive Criticism: Use a better cammera/video upload quality. Use a prepared script. Create a short video no longer 3 minutes long. Use a female narrator. Use exclusively flash animation along side the narrator. Avoid the use of acronyms not common to a 12 year old.
I agree with you insomuch as that he's talking about having created some sort of a breakthrough ... and then he can't really pull-off a clear record of it.
Very 'not convincing' of much of anything in my mind.
And, I say, if you are so smart why don't you simply throw your invention into a vehicle... and drive the length of Canada, or USA, or something!!
This may not be perpetual motion. But this guys could certainly have figured out a way to make motors a lot more efficient. If true, then even that itself would be a huge achievement.
He means a "back EMF" - an inductor/motor creates an electromotive force (EMF) that opposes the applied EMF - this is what stops a motor accelerating continually given an input current. The EMF is produced to oppose the applied EMF due to Lenz's Law.
EMF is what is measured in Volts.
What isn't clear here is what he is doing with the EMF from his coils and why he thinks he has stopped the back EMF inside the motor...
Apply power to a coil the magnetic field builds up. then shut off the power and you will see a voltage spike as the magnetic field returns to normal. Thats what "back emf" is, the polarity will be opposite you applied thats why they use the word back.
Yes, I think you're right. I noticed it capped out at ~110 RPM which probably has something to do with the AC current I assume he's using to begin with.
I think really its just a neat trick that appears to be more than what it is because he's measuring the wrong physical quantities.
Good explanation....
Are you looking for free energy generator?
Go to Google and search for "Top Magnet Generator Free Energy"......
Click the First Result (Skip the Advertisements)
Rick007191 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
this is gobbledygook to the average person. Would you please explain in simple terms what the hell is going on here? Is this thing running on its own without any electrical source or what? If so , wouldn't it be a novel idea to actually mention that here?
ehbseedy 4 months ago
Tesla did this about 90 years ago. He made an electric car run 90mph using nothing but the radio energy emitted by the Sun.
Nobody since then has even tried to get this far with that particular back emf recouping model and produced results like this.
Freakin Bravo! Well done.
BenZeneProject 6 months ago
its a scam... all its doing to continuing the load with reduced resistance. and he turns it off b4 it looses the load. example, if an ice skater is spinning and then she pulls here arms in, she starts to spin faster. but as with this engine, she will eventually start to slow down. he just makes sure to turn it off b4 that happens.
ThomasJeffersonMan 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Simple test to see if it is usefull!
Since the device has no output (the coils are either shorted or open), any power it generates has to be fed back to the motor driving it. So simply remove the device and see if the motor speeds up! If the motor runs faster without the device than it does with the device and the switches closed, then it's safe to conclude that it is a net power drain. But if the motor runs slower, then you might begin to argue that it's doing something useful.
CocksRobert 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Free energy has been here for a while ,But there are very powerfull forces that want to supress the technology,Find the real deal, a free energy device at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,take part in the revolution!
despinapjr 1 year ago
Great! Now give us a link to the plans on how to build it.
waterwart 1 year ago
This is hilarious, I just figured out why his observations contradict what should be happening. It's quite obvious, when he flips the switches thinking he's shorting the coils he's actually opening the circuit and when he flips it back and says he's opening the circuit he's actually shorting it. LOL. Amazing what a simple little error can cause.
dabyuboy 2 years ago
did i miss something? where's part 2? : (
imthefrogman 2 years ago
rambling to one who knows nothing...enlightenment to the rest of us...this guy has discovered somehting great...we need to listen to every word he says...
manwar999 2 years ago
lol, hysteresis, faradays law, and kirchkoffs first law. he turns off the coils, more current for the motor, hence it accelerates, the reason why you cant see the current to the motor in the demo. if it was powered magnetically, which of course it cannot be, hyteresis in steel, magnetic fields dont need matter to be 'transmitted', the coils are in the wrong orientation to the magnets on the generator, Lorentz's law. its a F A K E.
daenumen 2 years ago
Geez this guys rambles! How bout cut power to the motor and have it power itself!
jaysouth2000 2 years ago
it would stop.
daenumen 2 years ago
Fake,the pulse engine is the thing that makes clocks go and those swinging gadgets that can run for days.
Also for it's long run time it's the favo 'eternal engine' for perpetual motion freaks.
picobyte 2 years ago
I think it is an magnetic osillating effect that has to do with the speed of the magnetic propogation. The speed of the magnetic propogation is not a parameter normally associated with anything is electricity and magnetism. Thus the inability of the MIT professors to explain.
colinmaharaj 2 years ago
What more do you have about magnetic propagation speed ?
What are your sources and evidences ?
I would like to know more about it.
Regards
cmrafrica 2 years ago
Maxwell's relations, it travels at the speed of light, ie electro-magnetic wave.
daenumen 2 years ago
if that was true, wouldn't it have a positive net energy output? where is energy lost? i would really like to see an explanation of this with an = sign in it.
nosenseofhumor1 2 years ago
so what happend if the energy conservation law is false...your world comes going down?? haha
do you really belive all the people say?
bolita5 1 year ago
@bolita5 /facepalm. dude. what? jesus christ. idiot.
nosenseofhumor1 1 year ago
magnetic propogation speed is that of light, besides, magnetic fields dont need something especially a steel rod to travel down.
daenumen 2 years ago
I think it might be interesting if you try a double helix magnetic rotary system that intertwine. Inverse vortex!
lauramc2007 2 years ago
certainly imaginative, a double helix wont create an inverse vortex though, it would create an emf and mag field opposing the 'initiator coil, if one were powered and the other not, perhaps if there were no resistance, and superconductors didnt loose superconductivity in high fields, then it just might have produced a perpetual motion machine of the third kind, no free energy though.
daenumen 2 years ago
exchange cemf lag time with real time capacitance hi v not inductance...somethings strange here...open your minds...its all about TIME...
manwar999 2 years ago
if the coils are switched on, ie a circuit, then they will produce a resistive force on the motor. when they are switched off, ie a loose wire, there is no effect on the rotor, ie no varying magnetic field is being producedby the coils to cancel the changing magnetic field the rotor is producing through the coils, hence the motors work is no longer being resisted. there is no free energy in this device, infact i urge you to try it yourself. You will not get free energy from a mechanical system.
daenumen 2 years ago
si a esto s elo sumamos a una veleta en el techo no pararia jamas de dar vuetas, salvo que se acabe el mundo
ascalar 2 years ago
Maxwell would be cheering from his grave
robbosdog 2 years ago
Is this efficient enough for commercial use? Someone help me answer that, I'm not a physics major.
KrunchyGoodness 2 years ago
The electric field is comprised of light and heavy mass components. The light mass (Fermions) undergo acceleration that produces a relativistic shift in the clock rate of the particle.
When the electric field is separated the heavy particles (Bosons) attempt to torque, and the 'Static field" is engaged and pours energy into the system.
The over unity energy is being extracted from the inertial fields of the planet, which are the zero point or static fields.
Basic 'Static field technology.'
pjrsullivan 2 years ago
That's a brilliant idea. Probably doesn't break any rules, but it sure is efficient!
TheStickyNoteKing 2 years ago
couldn't it just be milking a source of energy not readily looked at, such as by slowly demagnetising the perm magnets?
RZheretic 2 years ago
Wouldn't changing from ferrite to Neodymium magnets give the system better effect?
babeluba 2 years ago
Dude you rock!
give this guy some support, we need more positive support on youtube and less flamers... let us see you build this guys
monopole2 2 years ago 4
Place the coils as close to the motor as possible, and try to find the perfect number of winding in the coil to match the motor coils. Do you think this would have an ant effect?
svesolar 2 years ago
Theres not much special about this, try a demo with a dual channel scope, Ch1: field coil(s), Ch2:Induction (generator)coil(s), the phase and magnitude of your claims will be VISIBLE. ......
dividebyN 3 years ago
Interesting, a crude self excited alternator........
dividebyN 3 years ago
Ah, thats what I was going to say, they are introducing power from the coils that make the motor run faster. I forget the rule for the reason why the motor slows down with the resistance build up on the coils, but Im sure that someone will know.
GTWCMT 3 years ago
its peripeteia...your raping the language
anarchy3E 3 years ago
Comment removed
VoyagerCSL 2 years ago
I suggest he gets a better speaker to explain what he's doing. Too many "ums", "ers", "ahs" and missed or cut words and just general monotony made the explanations quite difficult to follow.
Tonibee99 3 years ago
How is this a generator if it only increases in speed when the coils are shorted out? Where's the output power tapped from? And why is he talking about 'back emf in the air gap'? I thought back-EMF was a voltage, induced in a coil by an electromagnetic field working against the current that created it.
Fidelio76 3 years ago 2
Possible free energy from magnetic motor is,that must be inductor coil (non ferro,without core) between permanent magnets to minimize attraction or repulsion between permanent magnets.And I never seen on internet electromagnetic motor,were inductor coil is between permanent magnets.
vidmantasdd 3 years ago
YOu're right, it's resonance, but it's not something new. We just overlook it (I think on purpose). Factories have the ability to minimize jerking due to magnets in generators, but they left it really unbalance on purpose (and most motor u see use coils, ask yourself why). Someone hide the fact from the world all these time. It's not new Physics, it's a new era of treating each other. Myer guy use resonance to break water, magnet motor use resonance to self accelerate, now this. Wake up.
vietarc 3 years ago
The startling discovery of a new physical phenomenon: magnetic wave resonance...
bcfsl 3 years ago
please do correct me if im wrong i dont know much about electronics but from what it looks like to me is he's just using the motor to increace rpm to begin with then just switching to the magnetic thing to up the rpm even more but as soon as you introduce resistance it just slows down so all he's doing is creating alot of potential energy then wasting it.
anyone feel free to explain where the energy is saved.
omniwelder 3 years ago
its kind of hard to understand for me too, but i think the phenomenon that hes trying to show is the increase and acceleration of rotation, run on the back emf. you could use the acceleration to generate electricity and such.
pandaman0529 3 years ago
im still clueless what is back emf?
omniwelder 3 years ago
according to lenzs law its a voltage generated...i think based off the principle of lenz's law (trying to balance things out)
if anybody has like a degree in physics or electric engineering please help
pandaman0529 3 years ago
i should wait until after this demo, but from part 1 and 2 it just looks like he induced an electromagnetic field in one direction to stop turning and then reversed polarity to accelerate.
Havoc108 3 years ago
I don't think it's toping out. He is afraid of it coming apart. If this is truly whats implied lower the input voltage on the motor as it starts to rise in rpms. If it can do this it should run on it own after establishing a weak force field. Use a liner gen instead and feed the shaft.
mobyhunr 3 years ago
the most you can do is 99.99999...percent this thing must give off heat thus losing energy.
leanonme1 3 years ago
Why would be a billionaire? By simply saying perpetual motion he loses all credibility and absolutely no one, education or commercial would be willing to help.
Therefore he would be lucky to get anyone else, other than Markus Zahn, to look at this machine. Trust me on this. Markus Zahn will distance himself very very far from this machine.
rhbowman 3 years ago
I'm not so great with physics but.. This reminds me of when a spinning ice skater can control their speed of rotation by how much they retract their limbs. Maybe this is somehow similar... Maybe feeding the back EMF into the motor makes the rotations more efficient, and instead of jumping to a higher speed instantly and then gradually losing speed, the system reacts slowly so that you can visibly see the acceleration, therefore producing the illusion that energy is coming from nowhere..
Jinmane 3 years ago
This is retarded. If this guy created a generator that violates the law of conservation of energy, he wouldn't be making stupid videos on YouTube. He'd be a billionaire.
karl75771 3 years ago
Come to:
overunity dot com
There is all documented.
Many thanks.
Regards, Stefan.
overunitydotcom 3 years ago
the turns believed than it is to the government do you know about it already but did not they divulge. I hope that this bloke don't be withheld.
Regis2007 4 years ago
I'm no expert on this stuff, but usually when I hear about these gadgets it turns out that they are basically running on the potential energy of one or more magnets. Then the magnets will eventually de-magnetize, and the energy required to re-magnetize them exceeds the energy that was supplied. So before I consider this as anything special, I'd want to see a demonstration that shows more energy being supplied than exists in the potential energy of the magnets themselves.
bennettce 4 years ago 2
Wow, I'd never thought of that, but actually, that would be true. I agree!
PhuzyBuny 3 years ago
"bennettce"
"I'd want to see a demonstration that shows more energy being supplied than exists in the potential energy of the magnets themselves"
OR:
"more energy being PRODUCED than exists in the potential energy of the magnets themselves"?
If I understand what you are getting at, I'd like to add these comments:
1. Let's say the magnet will last 400 years, according to credible sources. And then let's take one-quarter of that estimate. Okay?
Now the magnet will last 100 years.
continued,
warrencurrier 3 years ago
"bennettce"
part 2:
So, IF the magnets' power does last 100 years.. and we can harness their power today (perhaps, soon), do we really need to find out the answer to your questions about how much energy it took to create the magnets' energy?
2. Regarding you statement about wanting to see a demonstration...
It'll be a long time before you see anything a great value.
Why?
They ARE NOT going to be manufactured & sold at WalMart, HomeDepot, etc, where you buy a take-home appliance
cont...
warrencurrier 3 years ago
Last thing I heard magnets last 400years but they have a half life kinda, bit like radioactive stuff there intensity decreases over time.
omniwelder 3 years ago
"bennettce"
part three:
2. continued: The dishwasher-sized units that will (can) power your entire house will not be for sale soon.
The technology, scaled-up, will go utility company already supplying the electricity to the grid/to your home. I assume you're on-grid
The utilities will likely charge you the same per KwH as they do now.
AND, the reliability of grid is enhanced, the greenhouse gas being produced is less, and, THEIR profit margins WILL increase.
These are only 'my ideas'....
warrencurrier 3 years ago 3
Forget all the early comments by the rednecks as they still think the earth is flat!
I share the comment by Xantos86 and am also concerned of yet another mysterious disappearance or extinction of the inventor...... muddy
GJCrabb 4 years ago
How often do you have to refill the snake oil reservoir?
lidarman2 4 years ago
How do we know you didn't just plug that motor into the wall and feed us some story about "back emf"?
guitarplayerepiSG 4 years ago
I think that his motor IS plugged into the wall!!
And also that is what the M.I.T. professor said in an article I just saw.
Also that professor is now trying to distance himself from this guy.
warrencurrier 3 years ago
very intruiging and interesting, if only i could ask questions to Mr Heins himself
swarmo8 4 years ago
Evidently, he's one of those people who does NOT respond, it seems, on these pages.
I DID receive an email from a guy who HAS built machines that are C.O.P. >1...
and he taught me a lot of cool stuff!!
the terms 'perpetual motion' is a term that, as I understand it, a real scientist/engineer will not use.
Even the term 'over unity' does NOT sit well with the inventor/discoverers I have talked to... but for the spamming of "Stephan, come to over-unity dot com to discuss further"!!
warrencurrier 3 years ago
it obvious that the machine runs on children's tears drained from the atmosphere. jk
Floydie905 4 years ago
Well, Steven Spielberg did convinced me that E.T. phoned home when I was a child.
Did you made this test under scientific condition in scientific laboratory.
Did any well known physicist has tested this system.
What king of academic background supports your claim?
moshebeeri 4 years ago
an MIT professor. do a news search somewhere
thebober10 4 years ago
Send a link
moshebeeri 4 years ago
Wow this really made a huge improvement to the efficiency of the electric motor!!!Cool!!! I hope the aliens that Mr. Bush control do not leave him with an anal probe. because i want this in my power wheel chair when i grow old.
FirstSecondThoughts 4 years ago
Nevermind if he goes missing, we saw enough to believe that this is possible and to build another one. Pandora's Box is open, Free energy is on the way. This YouTube video is his protection. If he goes missing we'll know it's really real and someone wants to supress it.
Xantos86 4 years ago
Why is your motor drawing 5 amps @ no load?
geohot 4 years ago 2
probably needs to be calibrated.
anolisporcatus 4 years ago
don't be surprised if this dude goes missing
cyber311hive 4 years ago 3
When coils are shorted it creates "impedance mismatch" between source and load resulting in load reflecting virtually all the power back into the source which channels it back to motor via ferrous material in coupler - which induces the acceleration. The spinning wheel becomes an energy STORAGE device storing more and more kinetic energy as it spins faster with no way to dissipate it. Will continue until centrifugal forces tear it apart.
The device is not PRODUCING energy. It is STORING it!
pwallace250 4 years ago 3
alright im really interested in this and im already thinking on ways to improve on the system to better harness the electro magnetism but at the end of the video with the calculations chart i got a bit caught up how do you have current in a low voltage/ground and high voltage with no current theres a ratio no matter what transformer you have voltage with no current and current without voltage doesnt make scence does it? if im wrong could someone explain?
Virius69 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
When he's at the claimed 60 RPM, it does not sound like his wheel is spinning at 1 revolution per second. So maybe his tach is inaccurate... which leads me to wonder... what else is as inaccurate?
electromaggot 4 years ago
I'm sure his electronic tach is much less precise than your highly tuned, mass produced ear.
vitr1ol 4 years ago 6
Lemme buy you a beer.
SupraCelica98 4 years ago
The flywheel wobbles quite a bit, so the only innacuracy is your interpretation of what you are hearing.
Zryuken 4 years ago 3
The thing he is calling a tachometer is apparently measuring frequency. Not 60 RPM but 60 Hz
4xj4 4 years ago
4xj4
I think you are correct with this comment.
Much more than 60 rpm .. rather a multiple of 60
perhaps.. 15 times 60(?)
warrencurrier 3 years ago
I'm confused because the motor involved is supposedly an AC induction motor. I thought these had to be fed with a specific frequency, and they would try to spin at that frequency. So I'm not sure how the acceleration affects the motor's ... spinning.
cyborgtroy 4 years ago
what are you exactly shorting when you say "shorting out the coil"? shorting it to ground, or simply closing the loop?
tozyagcilar 4 years ago
I believe he is closing the loop, so that....
THIS CONFUSES THE SHIT OUT OF ME, IT SHOULDN'T WORK!
cyborgtroy 4 years ago
This sucker's electrical, but I need a nuclear reaction to generate the 1.21 gigawatts of electricity I need.
analmist 4 years ago 11
can you make a condensed version of all the parts for people with ADD? This is cool, but I can't pay attention any longer.
josharenson 4 years ago
No doubt about it! This is a good technical series to watch over a few times because it is a good thought provoking technical demonstration. Looking at all the comments posted in all the various parts, it certainly has 'generated' plenty of pros and cons amongst all the 'experts'.
TECHKLEC 4 years ago
i love the sound of the system accelerating.. it really hightens the tension.. like the damn thing's gonna explode or something
laggist 4 years ago 2
It is a good test to hire physicists if they are able to pinpoint the errors !!
A basic electomagnet brake, like used in trucks, trains like TGV.
When you change the coils connections, you increases or decreases the brake. He does not show the speed with no iron of the coils in front of the rotating magnets. A proof is that this free speed is higher than any others.
It would more convincing showing his lawnmover cutting grass with no power cord or battery !!
or a TGV without nuclear power
lerieu 4 years ago 4
This system is currently being looked at with scrutiny by Massachusetts Institute of Technology professor Markus Zahn. He has high hopes for the invention and wonders why people haven't invented this 1 million times over the years. It seems so simple to him but the professor is looking more closely
eFlux 4 years ago 5
I agree with you on this one. it's possible that if he has managed to use the magnetic field induced in the coil(s) to increase the magnetic field in the driving motor, he might increase the efficiancy of the system, but it is never going to put out more power then it is using.
digitalhysteria 4 years ago
it's all in the magnets
hewsondion 4 years ago 3
this mans a genius.
cpnhowdie 4 years ago
i want to build this. then just run shit off of it. screw whether people believe it.
kenope 4 years ago 13
HAHAHA
You guys actually think that the comment saying "photoshopped" was serious? More like are you guys who downvoted it and are making fun of this guy actually serious!?
"Have you ever even used photoshop?" - I ask, have you ever even used the internet? "Photoshopped" is a claim made on many popular forums as a joke in reference to the original post.
Seriously, you guys, lurk moar; its clearly a joke.
Oh, also, the video was cool; something like this deserves at least some attention.
birdinator2021 4 years ago
Maybe they were being ironic
I dub it "Post-sarcasm"
kerryhall 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I agree, this is photoshopped. You can tell from teh pixels.
phatmikey 4 years ago
And what do the pixels say to you?
patchshorts 4 years ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
photoshopped
joerite 4 years ago
Photoshopped? He's done live presentations of this to universities.
Cerubois 4 years ago 7
Have you ever even used photoshop??? Did you not notice the fact that it's called PHOTOshop?
danhoch 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
retarded
Rhenthalin 4 years ago
totally...agree .
you can tell becasue his boobs are bigger and his skin has no blemishes
.. not
ruiner2501 4 years ago
It's not difficult to understand. Everyone who understands generators knows about back EMF. You have to ground the coil on your car engine or it will blow up. The difficult part to figure out is how to harness this power, because back EMF is a brief spike in reverse voltage. This machine here seems to do the trick. It's difficult to prove in this model, as you can see, because one would assume that the coils are just slowing down the motor, and shorting out the coil would reduce the effect.
harmono 4 years ago 2
I was actually referring to my other post about the steel core. The example without the steel core showed that the mechanism was running at a normal rpm, then stopped when the coil was shorted. According to your steel-core theory, it should have accelerated, because there was no core to interfere with the magnets, no?
Cerubois 4 years ago 2
I would have to watch the two clips again to comment properly and it is getting late here.
From what I saw the jist of the two clips is that shorting out the coils reduces the load on the motor and open-circuiting them increases the load on the motor, and I am pretty confident in my explanation. A lot of what he says in the clip tends towards gibberish, so that's my take on it.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
I understand what you mean, but I'm not entirely convinced by it... I think there's more going on here than we can figure out right now.
But I suggest reading the article when you have time, it explains it a bit better than he does, although it doesn't expand on theories.
Cerubois 4 years ago
So if he moved the coils away completely, there would be no load and the motor would attain the +/- 110 rpm?
nursecarmen 4 years ago
Absolutely!!!!!
jpasaure 4 years ago
I'd like to believe that Retrosurf's explanation makes sense, because in a way it does. The load taken off the motor would cause it to speed up.
But the rate of acceleration seems much slower than it would be in that case. It rises 1 rpm every 2-3 seconds or so, which seems wrong for a motor that has just lost 4 loads. It's too slow.
If you were to quarter a car's weight, you'd see an immensely significant difference in it's acceleration, not a slight one.
I don't think it's proven false yet.
Cerubois 4 years ago
this is how I remain aloft while you are on the planet.
vudukungfu 4 years ago
It looks to me like they have everything backwards. I am not exactly sure what he means when he says "shorting out the coil induces back EMF into the air gap", that makes no sense to me. What air gap? He also implies that a shorted coil somehow gives the motor more magnetizing current. How, pray tell? The coil is shorted unto itself!
None the less, he is what I think the crux of the problem is:
Drevtoobe 4 years ago 2
When he shorts out a coil he REDUCES the mechanical drag on the motor. That's because the coils is now just rushing current back and forth, with no voltage. Current times zero voltage gives you near-zero power dissipated in the shorted out coil. Hence the coil is not creating any magnetic repulsion when the rotor magnets pass by. There is no power transfer into the coil, hence no mechanical resistance. The coil effectively 'disappears' as a mechanical load on the induction motor.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
On the other hand, when the coil is open-circuited, there is no current flowing, and the coil also 'disappears' as a mechanical load because there is no power dissipated in the coil, just like I said for the short-circuit setup.
However, now the ferromagnetic iron core of the coil is creating mechanical resistance. When the stator magnets fly by they induce eddy currents into the coil. The eddy currents are dissipating power in the ferromagnetic iron core itself, i.e.' a load!
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
OOPS: "When the stator magnets fly by they induce eddy currents into the coil." SHOULD READ "When the stator magnets fly by they induce eddy currents into the ferromagnetic iron core."
Because power is being dissipated in the iron cores themselves, the iron cores slowly heat up as the motor turns.
Thus the induction motor slows down when the coils are open-circuited because some power is going into heating up the ferromagnetic cores.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
FINALLY, instead of short-circuiting or open-circuiting the coils, if he put four two-watt 100-ohm resistors across each coil, the induction motor would slow down much faster, because finally we are approaching an 'impedance match' where the coil back EMF is finally going into a REAL LOAD. The resistors would dissipate much more power than the eddy current power dissipation in the iron rods, and that would be the end of the experiment!
Give me my Myth-busters Brownie Points please.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago 2
One last point because I know that somebody is going to ask the question: When the coils are shorted out, yes indeed, there are no more eddy currents in the ferromagnetic iron cores. That's because the outer coil has current rushing back and forth through it, canceling out the magnetic filed from the moving stator magnets, for a net zero changing magnetic field in the iron cores themselves.
Again, these well-intentioned (I hope!) guys are just duping themselves here.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
please see Drevnoobes scintillating reply to the question of WHY physics student regularly perform such experiments if it(perpetual motion) is an impossibility?
in parts 1 & 2
ImWithStupidAkaDP 4 years ago
Please do.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago
Quite the opposite, in fact. I notice that you didn't mention (unless I missed it in your extravagant explanations) the differences shown when the steel bar was either removed or placed in (as shown in parts 1 and 2). The motor stopped due to the laod of the coil in part 1. Yet in part 2, it spead up.
I think this might be contrary to my earlier post, but I believe that "shorting out" the coils doesn't remove the load, it creates it.
Cerubois 4 years ago
Thus, in fact, part 2 shows that the load actually works as the opposite it should, speeding up the process instead of slowing it down.
Personally, I only have a high school knowledge of physics, and some of these terms are beyond me, but I can get the gist of it. I'm not convinced it's false yet.
Also, he brought this to Markus Zahn, a valued professor at MIT. If he hasn't figured it out yet, I doubt anyone here has.
Cerubois 4 years ago
"Speeding up" is a misnomer. You must remember that we are looking at a powered electric motor that "speeds up" because in one way or another, you have reduced the mechanical load on it. That's what is supposed to happen. Do it in 'reverse' (the correct way).... The motor slows down when you add a load to it. Wow.
Drevtoobe 4 years ago 2
Thank you for the lesson on how motors work. Now could you comment on the point of my post?
Cerubois 4 years ago
I have a home backup AC generator and when it has a load plugged in, you can't even pull the starter cord on the engine. Disconnect the load and you can crank it and start it.
rodgerdodger5 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Constructive Criticism: Use a better cammera/video upload quality. Use a prepared script. Create a short video no longer 3 minutes long. Use a female narrator. Use exclusively flash animation along side the narrator. Avoid the use of acronyms not common to a 12 year old.
charliepoor 4 years ago
Thats retarded criticism. Good criticism is to stop saying uh all the damn time.
FocusWithin 4 years ago
I agree - your criticsm is retarded. Next time keep it to yourself lamer.
SLUTM4STR 4 years ago 3
I AGREE
JO45YOU 4 years ago
charliepoor:
Wow!! People get pissed at you easily.
I agree with you insomuch as that he's talking about having created some sort of a breakthrough ... and then he can't really pull-off a clear record of it.
Very 'not convincing' of much of anything in my mind.
And, I say, if you are so smart why don't you simply throw your invention into a vehicle... and drive the length of Canada, or USA, or something!!
warrencurrier 3 years ago
That's the moment when he has to fear for his life, those in power would not let him live for long.
sarsanch 2 years ago
This may not be perpetual motion. But this guys could certainly have figured out a way to make motors a lot more efficient. If true, then even that itself would be a huge achievement.
iaansari 4 years ago
What the heck are you saying? "Back EMF"?
barophobia 4 years ago
I believe "back EMF" means back electromagnetic field. However I still don't fully understand what he means by back electromagnetic field.
charliepoor 4 years ago
He means a "back EMF" - an inductor/motor creates an electromotive force (EMF) that opposes the applied EMF - this is what stops a motor accelerating continually given an input current. The EMF is produced to oppose the applied EMF due to Lenz's Law.
EMF is what is measured in Volts.
What isn't clear here is what he is doing with the EMF from his coils and why he thinks he has stopped the back EMF inside the motor...
BewilderedKelli 4 years ago
Apply power to a coil the magnetic field builds up. then shut off the power and you will see a voltage spike as the magnetic field returns to normal. Thats what "back emf" is, the polarity will be opposite you applied thats why they use the word back.
tonytvtech 3 years ago 2
Sigh. If he were to separate his coil/magnet
arrangement from his induction motor with a 2
foot shaft, the effect will disappear, or at
least diminish greatly. Those neodymium magnets
are interacting with the induction motor. When
he "shorts the coils", they interact less,
and the motor speeds up as a result.
Sigh.
retrosurf 4 years ago 5
Yes, I think you're right. I noticed it capped out at ~110 RPM which probably has something to do with the AC current I assume he's using to begin with.
I think really its just a neat trick that appears to be more than what it is because he's measuring the wrong physical quantities.
blacklabelsk8erX 4 years ago 3
This doesn't violate the law of conservation of energy... not on a bet, crackpot physics, interesting toy to play with.
taylorcp 4 years ago