Hot Asian Girls Discuss Anarchy!

[serialkiller1990]

Ah yes. And i like the naked force of hot asian girls.

[serialkiller1990]

Rape is bad? Seems i owe apologize to some hot asian girls.

[plarfusa]

...hmm. this one's gonna look great in my browsing history. ;)

[stuntbaby63]

Stef. How do you define the word "murder"? Ted Bundy was killed by the State. Jeff Dahmer was killed by a fellow inmate. Are they both murder victims? Are their killers equally guilty of equal crimes? One mother kills her fetus. Another kills her newborn baby. Are both mothers murderers? Are both babies equally human? When do human rights begin? In WW2, my dad killed defenders of Hitler's grand plan. Did he murder them? Were they wrongfully killed? You must define your terms.

[MVPacMan23]

The two serial murderers deserved death. They are as equally guilty of immoral destruction as any government, and were held culpable for their depraved actions. A fetus isn't human, so the first mother is not a murderer. Anyway, she would have to share part of the blame with the doctor administering care (were abortion murder), as he would be fulfilling the role of a contract killer. A baby-killer is by definition a murderer, and your thus guiltless father was in effect protecting his own life.

[stuntbaby63]

@MVPacMan23 wrote, "A fetus isn't human." Folks realized they could live more convenient and profitable lives by enslaving blacks or by gassing Jews. They justified this evil by arbitrarily depriving these people of their humanity. The D.O.I. states, "all men are CREATED equal;...endowed by their CREATOR with...UNALIENABLE rights..." Scholastic Books lies about this history in 2 ways. 1) They delete the words "by their Creator". 2) They replace the word "created" with "born". Why?

[stuntbaby63]

@MVPacMan23 wrote, "The two serial murderers deserved death." I didn't ask if they deserved death. I asked if the State that kills is morally comparable to an inmate who kills. I'm trying to understand how Stef defines the word "murder".  In other videos, he seems to toss the words "kill" and "murder" around very loosely, as if they are interchangable. And in one video, he mistranslates "The 10 Commandments", saying "Thou shalt not KILL" instead of "Thou shalt not MURDER". See my point?

[stuntbaby63]

@MVPacMan23 wrote, "A fetus isn't human, so the first mother is not a murderer." OK. How would you judge these different cases: Mother #1 aborts her son because she wants to have a free and easy sex life. Mother #2 aborts her son because she is told she will die otherwise. Mother #3 aborts her daughter because she wants a son. Mother #4 aborts her son because he has Down's Syndrome. Mother #5 aborts her son because he has the "gay gene". Mother #6 aborts her son because it's her hobby.

[MVPacMan23]

The use of "her son" is inappropriate here. A fetus is a prenatal future human being, not a fully develope person wothy of the moniker "son".

All the examples you discussed are allowable, though 3, 4, and 5 are morally reprehensible. 1 and 6 are my heroes.

[stuntbaby63]

@MVPacMan23 wrote, "The use of 'her son' is inappropriate here." No, it's not. 1st, we identify the gender of fetuses all the time! "Oh, I just felt my son kick!" Wiktionary defines a fetus as "an unborn...vertebrate showing signs of the mature animal." -- "signs", as in genitalia? 2nd, "Son" illustrates the global problem of babies being aborted BECAUSE they're girls. You also wrote, "A fetus is a prenatal future human being". You may arbitrarily call it subhuman, but I refuse to. See?

[kwaal]

anarcho-capitalism is an oxymoron.

[SuperNick419]

Holy crap! Hot asian girls on youtube, no way!!! lol

[dopejoel]

hahaha!

[SofozMc]

How can I get the book mentioned in the video from the internet? I live in Cyprus and they don't sell it here. I do travel in the UK often in case they sell it there.

[graphattic]

StefHot

[libertarianjury]

Damn, I thought it was anarchist philosophy + hot asian girls! ...Back to the drawing board, stef! BTW: You should become a well-armed tax resistor, Stef. ...Down with the blue dudes in a costume!

[shehananadini]

Travel around the world with your Asian wife lushfmlk.info

[Raptoreyes]

What a title! However this video has only 7000 hits which is low for one of Stephens vids. I guess the promise of gratutius nudity or simple beauty is not enough for this gentelmans listeners. Perhaps people want deep discussion on issues... or perhaps they know they can find better p0rn elsewhere and come to Youtube for the more refined things. Hard to say what the motiviations of others are.

[BlancGivre]

In Quebec, they would physically remove you from your property but I doubt they would actually shoot you. Quebec blue uniforms are now experts at taking your good without shooting you. "We want your good and we will get it." is the Quebec gov motto. Of course if you were to use violence to resist them, then you'd be the instigator of the violence that befell you...

[VALsacount2]

@BlancGivre So? Haters gonna hate, haters hate on me and I stomp 'em in the nuts!

[pretorious700]

I'll watch hot Asian girls do anything

[VyseLegend]

LMAO! This is amazing. So true too.

[MHUnited1]

WIN.

[alennna]

hahaha! thank you Stefbot!

[robertwc82]

you needed to buy a book to figure that out? lol

[asdimd]

Stefbot, I love your work and have bought your books. I don't know if this has already been addressed, but what do you think about the use of non-lethal weapons by the State (e.g., tazers, ADS, etc.)? This has caused me a problem in my conception of Corporatist-Statism (which I think is a fuller concept than Statism) and the idea of legitimate implementation of violence.

[MutantBamHammer]

@asdimd Non-lethal? Torture. Also, resist long enough and the oppressors will delightfully switch to lethal, just to "end the problem."

[sonofagunM357]

Stefan is on the way to the top thanks to this new strategy

[nonantianarchist]

FALSE ADVERTISING!

[MarmaladeINFP]

I'm interested in how stateless capitalism would work. Oppression and violence isn't dependent on a state. Before a central police force existed in the US, capitalism had it's own hired police force (i.e., Pinkerton). Without a state regulating capitalism, capitalism will create act as a state. The only stateless capitalism that has ever existed would be small isolated hunter-gatherer cultures. I don't think stateless capitalism is possible with large concentrated populations.

[TombaFanatic]

@MarmaladeINFP

one could argue isolated hunter-gatherer societies were anarcho-communists

anarcho-communism isn't possible with large concentrated populations either. I think the big issue is the state. if a large population center NEEDS a government, then they will have to have one. but there's no reason that government should have control over an area the size the world's nations, or that it's rule should be absolute (medeival iceland for example, where there were multiple governments)

[arcanekrusader]

@MarmaladeINFP Keep watching ;)

[GIRL89cute]

what he talked about??? somebody can translate it to me in russian?...i know the capture, but when he talking...i just can t understand

[fujikokun]

i think that people are somehow unconsciously aware of what you're saying and are okay with it. the government is a bully the majority contract because they feel it does a better job of protecting them than they themselves could. the problem with anarchy is that few people want it.

government fucks up survival of the fittest (but this is not exactly the same as it is for other creatures, is it?), which is why most people fear anarchy. anarchy favors the interested.

just some thoughts. cheers

[wherearewegoing]

@fujikokun Not to be a jerk here, but you could say that about anything. "The problem with peaceful parenting is that not very many wants it." Is that an argument against peaceful parenting? I consider myself anarcho-syndicalist if I have to put a label on me, but I keep an open mind about everything. I don't suppress a single thought or opinion. I don't believe in anarcho-capitalism because it is kind of like survival of the fittest. "Convince people that your life has value or die" kind of.

[InternetArgument]

STOP TALKING ABOUT ANARCHY PEOPLE THIS VIDEO IS ABOUT HOT ASIAN GIRLS GOSH

/allcaps

[wiscsnowlover]

I heard there was gonna be hot asian girls provided at this discussion...

[nate556]

The reason people like japanese girls is because they look like 12 year old boys....

[Loathomar]

In what area can police shot an unarmed non violent person without reproductions? Most of the case that you speak of that will merely take your money, easy as they control most of the money flow. You are off there money flow and they can try to take your propriety, normally choosing a war of attrition rather then any violence. By your argument, any rule government or not is a threat of death. End of space

[Loathomar]

I don't see way it is any different if the government send man in blue customs or if the mob sends ppl in suits, other then the fact that society has agreed as a whole to the rules of the government. Is that the best from everyone? Probably not. Is there inefficiencies? Yes. Are there other example of how Anarchy works well on a large scale? Not really. I know the system the we are under is not great, and at times it really sucks, but is still better then anything else I have seen.

[eflonmusic]

mmm, the red room is hot~

[JTsmiley14]

"in a defiant geographical area like...Japan."

 LOL.

[robertdog0]

"if u pull a gun hes going to shoot you" or you could shoot him... think about it.

[Halboy10]

Once I but my knob away and started listening, I really enjoyed the talk!

[EgoTailTRAILCIRCLE]

I just rated your video

vote 111............. in our country the emergency number

[eman737]

lol thats so funny

im a fan of your videos and books man

[ufee]

Truly, the only reason I clicked on this video is because "Hot Asian Girls" was in the title. I don't have time to watch ALL your videos, after all.

[nate556]

Same. But I gotta say, I've seen, i've dated, asian girls that were hotter. I was with this chick once, she was about 35, but man... she knew her stuff. She did this thing where she... ohh nevermind.

[7oas7y]

You don't deserve so many thumbs up.

[McConsumer]

How dare you sir!1 To take the idea of a group of hot asian girls and use it so flippantly. I have half a mind to join the religious right, because at least they RESPECT the sacredness of hot asian girls.

[iamzacky]

This vid made me sOOoOoOo wet LOL v

[bigcatz4455]

i came to listen to hot chicks talk about shit!!!

[detriplea]

very funny

[ltshinta]

ahh wtf if you resist arrest they wont kill you, they will use a higher amount of force, but not kill you

[ultimategoobah]

well what if you use higher amounts of force? eventually they gotta' kill you.

[ltshinta]

but thats teh whole point. there isa cap on the force they are allowed and will use.

[ultimategoobah]

I truly doubt that. what will they do if they don't succeed? let you be?

[ltshinta]

You American? then no doubt. I on the other hand come from a country where we doint kill people for stealing a car or some other minor offence

[ultimategoobah]

where do you come from and can I go?

[firedog501]

5 stars for hot Asian girls

[verymaddog]

So libertarians are moral relativists. HAHAHAHAHAHA. Sorry, but just how ignorant can people be ? It's amazing.

[ultimategoobah]

I know. It's amazing. Everyone is ignorant calling each other ignorant. Can we really get any lower? xD

[ultimategoobah]

but libertarians arent really moral relativists.. they just believe morality is natural, not forced.

[DotPaulish]

I like your sense of humor. You got me here.

[wndy1975]

Anarchy is the fairest way. SWEET discussion, thanks! 8)

[NiceYourself]

False advertising

[BIZKID25]

You just want your cake and eat it too. You should just be a libertarian. You are a moral relativist.

[stefbot]

I am no moral relativist. You need to make rational arguments if you want to discuss this.

[BIZKID25]

Anarcho- capitalism is WHY you have to pay. Fuck capitalism that is true anarchy.

[RamblingsOfGarDyual]

LOl what??

[GeneralZaroff]

A+ would watch again.

[kulza23]

Great vid.

[xelenty]

Stef, your insights are truly depressing..... But all the same very compelling as always...... Keep up the good work....

[Shandalaybgood]

am i a lesbian now?

[Shandalaybgood]

this was cool, but you ruin it by mentioning anarchy. nobodys gonna wanna hear about anarchy, but the hot asian girls...yeah.

[idonthavemyid]

omg soooo hot

[Mattes50A05]

lol very nice

[lukeev]

GENIUS.

[Brothergeorge]

I expected hot asian girls, but when I noticed this was about a bald man talking about anarchy, I became so enraged that I masturbated and subscribed to your channel!

Piss me off again, and the consequences will be much worse than masturbation and a subscription. I might just come over to your house, and give you a thousand dollars!

[lukeev]

Stick with it, just 32 hours after subscribing to this channel hot asian girls appeared on my doorstep, it's part of the stefbot package, one group of hot asian girls guaranteed for every subscriber. Promise.

[Laguna727]

Brothergeorge: that was one of the funniest things I've read for a while. So....thanks.

[liviawillow]

Stef! You are brilliant! Rock on, FDR!

~l

[Durgeofcerberus]

i fapped

[demonique666]

lol, I may make a vid response.

[dysurian]

Hey...that was neither hot, nor Asian. I think I actually even learned something! What is the internet coming to these days?! I'd threaten you in the usual internet geek manner, but I agree that all threats are threats of murder, and I'm no murderer. Keep it up!

[pyrrho314]

try to stick to thing I've actually said. No, I do not think slavery is moral, AS YOU KNOW, eh?

You are born on your parent's property... how does that relate to it being their property? not at all.

My point is not to legitimaize US claim to this territory really, see also the genocide of the native American, but the claim to property that YOU might have is superceded by the claim of the US, because, it's printed on a document that only has weight in a US court!

[pyrrho314]

Whatever your claim to real property is, it canot be greater than the US claim because it's predecated on it. Deny the US owns the US, and we don't give the property to you as a result, but back to indigenous people. You don't seem to advocate that, right, you want the deed you have to be valid, but without the justice system it refers to.

thanks for replying... even if you disagree, do you understand the challenge?

[ultimategoobah]

No more property? sounds good to me.

[LibertyIsNotGiven]

**"My point is not to legitimaize US claim to this territory really, see also the genocide of the native American, but the claim to property that YOU might have is superceded by the claim of the US, because, it's printed on a document that only has weight in a US court!"**

You do realize this is completely circular, yes?

[pyrrho314]

It's not circular. I realize you will ignore the point to try to get a trivial win. The point is... the US claim to the US may be illigitimate, but it HAS to be at LEAST as legitimate to any Deed which holds weight ONLY in the US system. You cannot say the US claim to the US is not valid but think your deed to your real estate is valid. That deed is only as valid as the original US claim. Simple.

Are you saying we need to return the land to the Native Americans? Or not?

[Newbeeses]

Where are the hot azn girls. Why is there a bold middle white man?

[lemur257]

You know, there actually are youtube channels with hawt azn girls extolling anarchy. Subscribe to demonique666, for instance.

[pyrrho314]

if the slave could leave but chose not to, doesn't he have to live by the rules set out by the property owner?

or do you think the slave has claim to the owners land?

[LibertyIsNotGiven]

Ah, the failed "love it or leave it" (LIOLI) argument. I'm fairly certain Stef has a podcast on this. Strike the Root addresses it as well.

strike-the-root[dot]com/3/bake­r/baker1[dot]html

And to that article's conclusion I would add that falling back on cop-outs #2 and #3 creates a bizarre double-standard in which certain individuals are immune to the very principles used to justify the LIOLI assertion in the first place. So one has to claim the ideas to be simultaneously true and false.

[pyrrho314]

say what? so that is supposed to answer why your property deeds are valid but those the US upon which all current property claims are based are false. Does MA give the land back to the native americans or not?

[pyrrho314]

short version: this is how I found molyneux, I had questions/issues with DROs and was sent to listen to Stefan here... my question remained... it's a run around in terms of getting an answer. It's always "it's answered over here" but it is not, in fact, answered over there.

[regresseur]

Problem I see there is that by-in-large no choice is ever being made in the first place, let alone informed decision making. Average Joe doesn't ponder his government and weigh it against other forms of government. Susie and Joe slave, get wasted and slave, have a kid and slave, slave a little more and then die.

And the owner's land thing: well, all I wanted to say here is that no land truly belongs to anyone... IMO....

[Genowulf]

So, do you ladies like sushi? I've got a whole crate at my place. :D

[EntertainedWatcher]

I came!

[stefbot]

i conquered ;)

[EntertainedWatcher]

You're so naughty..

[DMU555]

@stefbot And I saw O_O

[pyrrho314]

stefan, I get this all the time, and this is not my only approach, this is why I must come to you... Either I accept their point right off or they go mum.

I consider myself a progressive libertarian, an anarchist of the anti-hierarchy, not anti-communal sort... I'm friendly to many of your principles... I appreciate your point about self-change leading to social change... feel free to outline how you think I should approach this fairly.

[pyrrho314]

please, I'm sure such a bold system has bold defenders besides stefan? anyone? what about you stefbot, I'm sure you are not daunted by my point, nor others I'd bring... this one is to face the concept that the US is a holding corp for common property got by settlement.

Surely you get at least my point that a property deed in the US is a US legal document.

Granted... the US rents even private property, cause it really owns everything within the border. Not saying that's good... but true.

[lemur257]

Hawt Azn girls!!! Hey wait a minute...

[pyrrho314]

seriously... I think I'm dealing with this fairly, and with humor, non-derisive, to make a point clear. The response is unimpressive. Nothing against the fans, but really, study up or something. I can drop the humor if you prefer it dry, but seriously, I have some strong arguments for you that you will be stronger for surviving... given that your ideas do survive them.

[pyrrho314]

raters, please understand, you want to change the whole world to your system... I have little need to hear back from you in that I can analyze the system from Stefan's writing etc etc.

But I am giving you a chance to defend your system answer answer the flaws I find.

I'm open to being swayed as I believe in NAP, I believe in personal sovereignty, personal autonomy.

There are a lot harder people to convince than me... though, I do have some seriously difficult dillemas for you, but be brave.

[stackedmidgets]

Hello,

Where can I meet other girls like you?

[undefinedego]

"hot asian girls discuss ana..." is what it says on the thumbnail, very misleading! XD

[Snowball99]

I would be interested in hearing you critique Thomas Paine's "Agrarian Justice" and "Rights Of Man"

[Snowball99]

If thats what hot asian girls look like in an anarcho-capitalist society, then I fear we are doomed to tyranny! ;-)

[pyrrho314]

excuse me... you say you didn't agress anyone when you didn't pay taxes, but you used US property, did you not, you are on OUR property.

We charge a fee to be on our property, held by US Inc. (more or less), and if you don't want to pay, emmigrate to another nation... shazam you don't pay our taxes/fee.

[realworldplayer]

Whos we?

[pyrrho314]

me and the rest of the property holders... the US is nothing but a holding corporation for our common property.

granted we stole it from the native americans but hey, your Deed to that property is a US legal document... even having a deed means you used US legal infrastructure. Pay up. (j/k a little)

[OparinsBulldog]

That would only be true if he were using more of the property than that which was stolen from him. Given that he makes a decent amount of money, it is highly unlikely that he would ever use enough government "property" to be greater than that amount.

[pyrrho314]

what is this money you talk about... I think my holding corporation prints that stuff.

[LatinYoung20]

Thats just nonsense.

Why would you argue that YOU are the owners of the properties on America, why would you argue that if Stef doesn't want to pay taxes he would have to leave? I mean you really have to have your head fucked up to think that the use of the gun will make you the owner of the land. Besides with what you are saying, that would mean that if Stef doesn't want to leave, he will be shot. So Stef is right in everything he says here. Your are just making murder threats.

[pyrrho314]

because my ancestors came over on the Mayflower and claimed it.

Why would YOU own it if we can't? We took it so you could own it!

I believe in non-aggression, I'm making no threats.

please calm down.

I think you get what I'm saying.

[pyrrho314]

if the US doesn't own the property it claimed, then no citizen does either... it all goes back to the Native Americans, and not the ones that were here when we got here either... the ORIGINAL first claimers prior to any dislocation due to conflict among those people's descendants.

I hope they have deeds on record.

[Genowulf]

pyrrho, you can download an audio version of "the ethics of liberty" by Rothbard on mises(dot)org where he walks through logical ways of coming into ownership of property and addresses some of these arguments.

Of course, do what you want, by no means is this an order.

[pyrrho314]

thanks for the recommend, but why can't I get a discourse on this? I've been sent to liten to a lot of expert... the things I listen too/read always have the same issue... why no direct defense? I'm supposed to be convinced by listening but what about an answer to my charges? does MA not work like that? Did you hear an answer to my plea in that podcast/recording? what is it? Thanks for trying to be helpful but really...

[pyrrho314]

if the gun doesn't make you the owner, then it all goes back to the native americans and stef can't have a thing.

[pyrrho314]

see, "thumbs down" is not a compelling counterargument to my point.

this is why I have sought out stef, because of people that "believe" the same ideas but "thumbs down" is the extent of the defense they can give them.

The ideas (like DROs) are obviously good enough to at least deserve better defense than that, CLEARLY.

[pyrrho314]

mr. thumb, you just downrated this summary "The ideas (like DROs) are obviously good enough to at least deserve better defense than that, CLEARLY."

You don't think they deserve a better defense then "nuh-huh!"

[pyrrho314]

lol, stef I disagree with you on many things, I still owe you a message to see if we can debate a few issues some of your fans have recommended I take straight to you... anyway, later on that... but "hello, I'm a group of hot asian girls"... roflmao.