Added: 1 year ago
From: razethew0rld
Views: 17,312
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (205)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 8 CORES!?!?! FUCK I still have a dual core!

  • Bulldozer sucks mad hard.

    

  • what about the FAILdozer?

  • @lockecole21 i know i have owned 2 i7 processors I overclocked them,, should still work i used water cooling to assure me that they would not burn, the processor was always around 45-60 celsius... how the hell is that possible..? Then i bought Amd, overclocked to the max, low temp around 50celsius and NEVER had problems with it...

    but i have to agree that the bulldozer did not quite live to its expectations.

  • @lockecole21 better performance and more fair price... amd is for pr0z

  • you know i never knocked intel for thier processors, so i dont understand why people should knock amd if they make a really good product and it performs like they say, shouldn't that be good enough? i mean shit it is not like the cpu is working alone anyway! theirs the ram ,then the graphics card and the motherboard as well and depending on what you have that is what makes for a really good computer for gaming to me! and from what ive seen and heard this bulldozer does kick some serious ass!

  • @dan75robot Well, that's because Intel doesn't hype their products to Narnia, and then it turns out that it fucking sucks. AMD did that. They also miscalculated how many transistors were in the Bulldozer line of CPU's. By 800 MILLION.

    The Bulldozer uses up alot of power, it's warm and not worth the money. An FX 8150 at stock uses 243w in load, which is fucking ridiculous.

    Bulldozer sucks, for the price you would be alot better off with an i5 2500K.

  • @TriggaTap

    What are you talking about.

  • Minor correction from talking out my ass, **2600/2700K**

  • AMD = Another Major Disappointment. It's dogshit, I can't believe anyone spends $340 on that garbage when there's no performance leap above their previous Phenom II X6 processors. Buy an i5 2500K, i7 2600/2007, overclock, and it's better performance right out of the box. AMD doesn't realize this at all, it's not the quantity of cores that matter, it's the quality and efficiency that matters most. Four core Sandy Bridge beats eight cores? Come on man. Just absolute dogshit.

  • @Phenomental1ty Wow dude you can read stats from a box +1 too bad you are dumb enough to throw 7X more money at them for it -10 for stupidity...

  • ..cuz it suckssssss

  • dude..if they had sent him a setup..they wouldn't have made as many sales..lol

  • 3:24 goddamn it AMD send that guy a 8 whores oh shit cores bulldozer

  • ADVANCED MICRO DOGSHIT

    EPIC FAILURE FX CHIP

  • Lol you can get 5 GHZ of just air... Tink about water-cooling xD also it's not 8 full cores, it like 8 3/4ths cores.. That's it!

  • Anyone knows how these bulldozers run bf3 considering the game is optimized for more then 4cores?

  • @FullFledged2010 just get a good VIDEO CARD like HD6850 will do fine as for cpu phoenom 2 or 1gen i core will do fine.

  • @21boxhead Already got a set of dual gtx570's and a phenom 965 @ 4.2 and it maxed out my cpu at 95-100% constand load getting only about 35-50fps.

    And when i put it back to stock speeds the fps dropped below 30fps so it was deffinitly bottlenecking my graphiccards

  • @FullFledged2010 turn off some background programs that are eating away your cpu performance

  • @21boxhead i checked for cpu eating background apps, that wasn't the problem. Besides other games were running fine with not even 50% cpu usage.

  • @FullFledged2010 check for viruses and if dont work clean install and if the same then that cpu sucks

  • @21boxhead I have seen the same thing happen to other guys with sick graphiccards and this type of cpu.

    Bf3 is very VERY cpu demanding especially in 64player maps so i'm not surprised this would happen.

    All i want to know if these 4 extra cores make a huge difference?

  • @FullFledged2010 well one that most overlook thing is the hard drive, switch to SSD and everything will improve in gameplay 8cores that 16cores wont matter they can even make 50cores and still it wont matter if doesn't performance well. Phenom 955 is weak compare to the new A3850 apu for around the same price.

    if you still loyal to the brand just upgrade to 1100T to save money vs the FX8150. definitely look into hard drive first.

  • @21boxhead I had the beta installed on an Ocz agility 3 so that wasn't the problem eighter

  • @FullFledged2010 Also i have ddr1600 mhz @ 1600mhz and a 990fx chipset all powered by an 850watt xfx psu before you think that could be the problem.

    I'm not loyal to any brand but they say the 8150 smokes the 2600k in bf3.

  • @FullFledged2010 what beta?

  • @21boxhead Bf3 open beta?

  • @FullFledged2010 what video card you have?

  • @21boxhead 2x evga gtx570 classified (almost at 580 speeds) in sli.

  • @21boxhead And again the metro map was running fine getting around 70fps no problem but caspian border with 64 players in busy area's it dropped down to around 30 fps and lagging all over the place (no internet lag)

  • @FullFledged2010 what video card?

  • @21boxhead For for the 3th time 2x gtx570 @ 580speeds

  • @FullFledged2010 yeah time for a 1100T or A3850 or switch to intel 2500k.

  • @21boxhead A3850 probably because i also do a lot of 3d rendering

  • @FullFledged2010 in my opinion I think you should go for 1100T if you doing 3D rendering.

  • @21boxhead At stocks speeds yes but I hoping i can get that bulldozer close to 5 ghz

  • @FullFledged2010 thats if you want to disable cores to achieve those clocks speeds but besides that 2500k uses less power and costs way less performs better then FX-8150 chip and 1100T is best if you want save money and have good performance but in the end even overclocking FX chip it still wont beat 2600k at stock speeds. A3850 is equal to i7 920

  • @21boxhead But it does beat the 2600k in bf3 and thats the mean reason i need a better cpu so it might be a better choice for me

  • @FullFledged2010 I seriously doubt that but it seems you already made your choice and also fuck EA there are the worst company on the planet too greedy too shady releasing crap most of time few are actually good and even its has small maps few levels

    i would go with COD: MW3

  • @21boxhead I agree with EA being greedy but i've played the beta + i'm a bf2 veteran so i know what i'm doing.

    These is simply nothing better out there atm.

    And i'm willing to spent another 100 euro just to make sure this game runs as smooth as possible.

  • @FullFledged2010 Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 is better then BF3 and about you being bf2 veteran really? well that's an old game either way they both new MW3 and BF3 games will have the same controls

  • @21boxhead Sorry but i think BF3 is superior in every way to any shooter today.

    MW2 (and probably MW3 as well cause its based on the same old engine) feels cheap and static compared to the fluid animations/movements BF3 has.

    And please don't compair BF3 or any real BF game to the bad company series because its a completely different gameplay.

  • @FullFledged2010 iw engine v.3.0 mw1

    iw engine v. 4.0 mw2

    iw engine v. 5.0 mw3

    and EA turn

    frostbite v1.0 bad company1

    frostbite v2.0 battlefield 1943,bad company2,metal of honor

    frostbite v3.0 bf3

  • @21boxhead iw engine v. 5.0 mw3 isnt even an official name and all it does is make distant objects a little clearer and you got better sound that is no were near as good as in bf3.

    Saying you like the gameplay of mw3 more is okay but don't compare the specs of the engines because then its all over for mw3

  • @FullFledged2010 both games just did improvements and what?

    black-ops beat down metal of honor last year i wonder why?.

  • @21boxhead Okay i'm not going to argue about which game is better of which game has the most sales because that is pointless.

    Al i can say is that the frostbite 2.0 (not 3.0) engine has the most,newest and the best features. The gameplay is a matter of personal taste.

  • @21boxhead The three Frostbite engine builds you listed aren't even correct. EA claimed Frostbite engine 1.5 for Bad Company 1 and 2. For BF3 they claimed Frostbite 2, which shows vast improvement over 1.5, as opposed to the MW games where small graphical improvement is seen, and between MW2 and MW3 the only thing that changed was how far-distance objects were rendered.

    Honestly, I don't even know what your point is.

  • @oloompop MW3 8millions copies in one day, BF3 3millions copies over a few days because most know that EA is full of shit and spread bullshit and make shitty unfinished games for release.

  • @21boxhead I don't support either game, I think both games are equally shallow and boring. BF3 still looks better. Sales figures do not necessarily relate to quality. Bieber has the most liked videos on youtube, must mean he's an amazing singer mirite?

    Either way, I'm not going to waste my time arguing over this. Both games are stupid. I'll keep Counter-strike, thanks.

  • @oloompop no bieber got more dislikes than likes, now to the game where getting this is information that BF3 is better than MW3 because is known EA is a shit company they are known to release half done games in the past and spread lies about there competitors and kids will easily buy into there lies im not surprise your one.

  • @21boxhead You just completely ignored everything I said besides the Bieber point. I won't bother replying anymore, because this whole thing is stupid and you aren't even making coherent and complete thoughts.

  • @oloompop wait for counterstrike: global offensive cant wait for zombie mod upgrade there you happy?

  • @FullFledged2010

    LOL bf3 does not have fluid animations, that is the only thing i hate about the game, jump over a ledge you like fly through the air doing flips and shit.

  • I don't think its going to *annihilate* the ' i ' series. the 2600k outperformed the i7-990 (6 cores) just because its more efficient. secondly there isnt much out there that's going to take advantage of the 8 cores. It'l outperform intel for about 6 months until intel releases its ivy bridge 22nm architexture with 3d transistors. which give it about a 25% increase, Intel will be king once again. AMD Enjoy your moment, cause it wont last long.

  • the next apu system based on bobcat and bulldozer will stagger nvidia and intel 2 birds in one stone

  • Did you get it yet?

  • well u cant complain if that information was not supposed to be seen

  • this guy is fool

  • Enter the pimp cup at 0:13

  • AMD Bulldozer 8 CORES is better than I7 2600K? Gaming 2011/2012?

  • All these benchmarks should be based on null values not overclocked values. As it stands, a 1866Mhz DDR 3 bus against 1333Mhz DDR 3 bus might have an advantage alas it depends on the rest of the architecture. 8 cores against 4(8) cores they might not be much of a difference.

  • AMD may have had a bulldozer a year ago before SB, but not now. AMD is late as usual to the game.

  • 3:21 i wanna get my hands on them!

    lol that's what he said :)

  • Wow... how can you say Bulldozer will beat Sandy Bridge? did you own one? where did you get that? in the net?? AMD website? man, thats why Marketing Strategist is the coolest job to do because it can make dumbasses to fuck themselves... remember what they say in phenom ii x6? are we having de javu here? so shut up and lets find "Ourselves"!!!

  • heyyy there you are, i thought that u went from this world i wasnt seen since you left frm tigerdirect. You are good in this!!!

    a fan From México

  • @jhcenturionespejel Oo and funny too

  • The last Cpu AMD sent you was the AMD 64 x2 6400+ BE Logan I really don't think they will send you any more cpu s if that was the last one sent lol you better Tiger Direct's C.E.O on the horn for your BullDozer

  • Is this true that amd cpus lag a little bit or something ??? Is that true ?

  • @TheXtremeGamer90 What does that even mean?

  • @onimotoko It means that i have some lags and bugs with my amd card...Previusly i had nvidia and i havent those problems !

  • @TheXtremeGamer90 Well you said CPU, so I was thinking about your processor, not video card. And BTW lag is usually having to do with RAM and in some cases VRAM. So it stands to reason that getting a new card could fix that issue.

  • Some AMD bulldozer information here watch?v=A70M-JInfIg&feature=ch­annel_video_title It looks very good for AMD since it outperforms the 2600K across the board.

  • Funny thing is that netbook with one will run crisis ha to you idiot your afraid wittle intel will go run an hide which they should an give up to amd ftw for life

  • send him one man!

  • GO TO HELL DAM IDIOT!!! more views ... more idiots...posting these genre of bullshits! die...

  • AMD: Bullshitter cpu, coming soon, HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA, HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA­AAAAAAAAA!

  • @carlhil2 I just saw another video where a guy was claiming a netbook with one of these processors was running crysis 2 with full effects! HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

  • Anyone knows when is it comming out?

  • @iiH3R3T1C After seeing the press conference. AMD said that motherboards are coming out next month and Zambezi CPUs the month after.

  • I didin't want to die.

  • Your from tiger direct! WTF

  • AMD!!! SEND LOGAN A BULLDOZER!!!

  • donanimhaber means hardware review. it's a pretty typical/mainstream-ish name for this sort of thing :) at least in turkish

  • He says "I cant wait to play on 8 cores" but isnt 4 cores gonna be the same In-game as 8 cores?

  • @SlugNation Kinda depends on the game.

  • Come on AMD, everybody is hating on you, praising Intel, this man isn't, he loves you. RETURN THE LOVE!!

  • I had to sub because banner says sub or die and im not ready to die yet :(

  • ...And you never showed the graph. Nice one, asshat.

  • So this is where Logan is.

  • but LGA 1366 despite not overclocking as well as 1155, was indeed better, for starters 1155 as of yet has to release a cpu with 6 cores, also why only have the cpu with only 16 pci lanes? the problem is Intel marketed this "second geneartion CPU" as a performance successor to their previous generations cpu's Xeon included, but for enthusiast users, despite their overclocking capabilities, having only 16 pcie lanes makes near impossible to have 3 EFFECTIVE gpu configurations aka SLI AND CROSSFIRE

  • @MrSuckmyballs32 but why do they focus so much on adding more cores? A hardcore gamer will only need 4, defiantly no more than 6... They need to make them faster, less power, less heat, and CHEAPER

  • @SlugNation because some of us will be doing CPU intensive applications as well as multitasking, look i dont hate intel and yea, more cores dont matter when most software wont even use them, but the thing is, AMD is trying to address the Core/thread question, where intel forces 2 threads out of 1 core, Bulldozer is a more effective design where a core is really 2 cores and they both have dedicated threads, so in theory they should be just as good as any Intel cpu right out now if not better

  • @MrSuckmyballs32 Actually Crysis used all 4 cores way back in 2007. Many games these days are actually requiring the multi-cores. Octocore means you are prepared for the future. I know I ain't gonna regret buying this beast.

  • @onimotoko regardless of which way we look at it, we cant deny the fact that this will be a 3.8Ghz (4.2Ghz turbo) 8 core that will put Sandy Bridge back to the drawing board.

    imagine just how far we could push this new thing with the right cooling.

    and forget about the Intel dilema, having to buy a new motherboard every time, because AMD actually tries to prolong the lifespan of their boards as much as they can.

    This is a good time for us PC enthusiasts.

  • @MrSuckmyballs32 From what I have heard from the official AMD news, the 8150p will be stock at 4.00 GHz and will be able to go to 4.40GHz with turbo. I think it could easily get to 5.00GHz with the right cooling. Think about the possibilities with 8-10 cores running at 4 GHz or more. I am very excited to see the next few years in PC hardware. One thing is for sure, consoles R in trouble again, the PC has made a real comeback thanks to AMD.

  • @onimotoko well if thats the case for the 8150p then I eat my words yet again, THAT IS INSANE!

    honestly that thing will probably hit the 7Ghz with water cooling, or maybee some bad ass air cooling. regardless of how fast it will be, atleast we know that the 990FX boards will last us a good time, and I am sure that they will also release an even higher end 8 core cpu as AMD usually does. i think the i7 2600K will find its been unfairly outclassed, sorry intel AMD is back.

  • hes fucking funny ^^

  • wow it is him from TIGERDIRECT wow this guy had me laughing so many times what every happened to him? got fired or something?

  • LOGAN OMFG !!!! FROM TIGERDIRECT <3333

  • Just In...

    Leaked benchmark for AMD Bulldozer both FX and Llano. Google it!

  • didn't this guy use to do the Tigerdirect videos?

  • @leivabernie Yes he was. Most enjoyable reviewer.

  • @indyfan2 Damn straight, I got my first video card because of his review XD

  • I don't think Intel's ankle is sprained anymore : )

  • "Stab the beast!" hahahaha!

  • I want to play with 8 whores too!!!! Oh.. wait you said cores..

  • NIGGER

  • I was reading and what i found about all that ammount of cores is becasethey are supposed work is sharing the work between 2 small cores (just imagine the size there are 8 of that stuff on 32nm o_O) and then work better than a very amazing Intel Core with shares resources to make the things easier, so unless AMD really putted a nice conection and amazing power in the small cores, the graph is a really serious doubt.

  • this guy's funny lol

  • Charlie Sheen would be proud of another winner.

  • Why would anyone need an 8 core cpu? There isn't really anything out there that fully utilizes a 4 core cpu yet.....I have a Core I7 running @ 4.2ghz with 2 GTX 580's in SLI.....why would someone need 8 cores? There isn't ANYTHING I can't run right now on 4 cores.What programs/games are gonna utilize 8 cores 100%? Answer = NONE!

  • @xlr8r2010 Hardware doesn't come out to accommodate software... it's the other way around.

  • @xlr8r2010 not yet at least. i'm the same way with an i7 and 3 6950's....but the tech world doesn't hold still. there will be software and games designed to utilize those 8 cores.

  • Send him the Bulldozer! ahahahahahas! :) I want either Llano or a Bulldozer. LoL* What do you guys think? LMAO*

  • u alive?!?!?!!!

  • wow, I bet your toilet even has a "intel inside" sticker.

  • @jabberwoccky70 Oh look! A fanboy! Get a life dude...seriously pick whichever you like and go with it. Don't TRY to insult other people. Especially on youtube, pretty low.

  • for the record it wasnt a cpu recall for intel, its was a sata controller on the chipset, but about the amd thing, as much as i love my cheap and powerful amd, i wont believe the "benchmarks" til i have one in my hands. But to top it off, its an 8 core with pipeline technology, similar to cuda from nvidia

  • for the record it wasnt a cpu recall for intel, its was a sata controller on the chipset, but about the amd thing, as much as i love my cheap and powerful amd, i wont believe the "benchmarks" til i have one in my hands

  • high son of a bitch!!! i RLY dont like YOU!!!

  • LOGAN!!! I'm happy to c ya.

  • i remember this guy from tigerdirect, & glad his still on interents, he is made for television

    i also remember the video he made for that dual core

  • @danthemanzizzle There are "modules" (building blocks) containing 2 cores each. And 8 cores mean 8 threads running on 4 modules.

  • LOGAN!!! I havn't seen this guy since he left TigerDirect =/!

  • @madzane94 I was about to say..

    I haven't either. Great to find him again.

  • @madzane94 He got fired for disclosing classified information.

  • @merts487 not true, he's still working there.

  • when is bulldozer coming? at what price?

  • Gonne buildoze that sandy bridge of intel.

    I have a feeling this will be used alot in the future :D

  • By the way. yes me again.. its not an 8 core cpu..It is 4 module with double integer corers with in..

  • Hi.. I am Towarscke from Turkey.. You can find me in "donanimhaber"(hardwarenews). Yes there is a leak from a website.. you can also see detailed tests.. There is a website.. You have to research about in google.. You can find by typing in search bar as "Bulldozer exclusiva"... yeah it a first link...

  • @Towarscke The "Bullozder exclusiva" article at Chile Hardware is a copy of the april fool's joke article published (and retracted later due to incorrectly "citing" an AMD guy) at AMDZone.

  • keep the pressure on them!!! XD

  • It wasn't a CPU recall, it was the MOBO CHIPSET.

  • @Emeianoite Word. Just them SATA ports easily fixable with a SATA PCI-E card or just use the SATA 6 gbps ports.

  • @DrSandeepluthra yea, and it was very few that were affected. The ones we heard about were the unlucky few... regardless of some P67's running like champs. I'm slightly jealous of the good ones, I was just going to order mine when I found out last month :(

  • hooooooly monkeyballs!!!!!

  • The thing that sets the new AMD cpu apart from Intels new gen, is that they aren't threading, but using multi cores as one large cpu, if I'm not mistaken. I think the benchmark numbers can be true, but it depends on the software used to benchmark it. I'm already on the fence on this, I really wanna a killer cpu from AMD, I'm tired of Intels high price=high performance, it's bs

  • Bulldozer = D12N heading straight for Intels north wall.

    1. removal of redundant elements faster through put and saving space

    2.hyper threading at 16 cores?(possibility)

    3.already has been stated 50% faster than currant Phenom II cpu's

    4. Phenom II x4 975 @ 3.6Ghz, 1100T x6 3.7Ghz turbo core?

    5. quad channel memory.

    all that you need to do is look at the old and you can see what the new will be like.

  • cant wait for these cpu's! got the cash so hurry up amd!!!!!!!!

  • bulldozer 4.0 stock 5.0 turbo core with 4 processors active on the orchi..and having 2 threads per core when only using half of the processors!!!! just a guesss

  • yeah SEND THIS MAN A BULLDOZER!

  • Lol Badgers

  • No Intel fan disliked cuz they're still busy rubbing their sprained ankles : )

  • LOLLL. Dude I think that Tiger Direct really needs to hire you back cause the guys they have now are BORING. I don't know what happened, But I don't give a shit either. OR, Newegg needs to start doing videos like Tiger does and hire you. Just my 2cents

  • @csy30076

    i agree!!!! and i believe that wat u suggested should be done as this guy was pretty good at wat he did :P

  • @csy30076 in the "employee doing the video" thing, Linus wins for NCIX, hands down

  • fucking brilliant.

    Angry badgers, live starving angry badgers :P

  • i am pretty sure zambezi will be MORE than 50% faster. and yes that leak is fake since there was 3 mistakes in that slide.

    -8 cores

    -3.5 ghz+

    -500mhz turbo when using all cores(even more while using less than 8 cores)

    -completely new architecture. which will result in 20-60% better performance clock for clock.

  • Those "leaked" slides are so fake, the faker didn't even spell Cinebench right (it shows "cinibench") lol

  • try the google voice to text caption thing is hilarious

  • Sandy Bridge showed some incredible performance upon release, so I'm hoping Bulldozer will atleast rival that for a similar price..

  • Come to Austin, I know where their offices are in here.

  • SEND THIS MAN A BULLDOZER!

    Where is my thumbs up?

  • AMD THIS MAN CAN SAVE THE WORLD WITH AN 8 CORE CPU!!!!

  • NOT THE LIVE STARVING ANGRY BADGERS!!!

  • SEND THIS MAN A BULLDOZER DAMMIT!!!!!

  • @gravediggmn man i was about to say the same thing

  • Honk if you're horny. Someone in the background is :).

  • go amd 

  • In Flames

    Colony

    You love that shirt don't you? I know i love mine.

  • They would be more than happy to send you a Caterpillar D10N

  • @crimson177 i think he leaked a nvidia stuff (its a rumor)