Yeah, concentrated listening to your breath is all you need to transcend the duality of doing an being. It´s something you do, but it´s also just something that is.
This is why I believe music to be superior to art. Art is most often a static statement of which we can only register the surface. In contrast, music is a continuous flow of audiable ideas that change and reveal which I find infinitely more satisfying. What is your opinion?
Visual art goes deeper than you admit. Of course it depends on whether the visual artist thinks meaning and depth is significant to art. If one doesn't, then visual art is as bad as you say.
Art seems to spoonfeed us the artist's intentions, (taking for granted that we have the capacity to realise the artists intentions). By knowing a painting we may know the artist, but by knowing a piece of music we come to know the composer and also ourselves.
Words to me, are simple prisms for our infinite light.
We are psychic by nature, words to me, are like an 8bit version of understanding. not communication, understanding hint hint. Words, are linear, reality, is not. So how then are words anything but temporary "prisms" for consciousness?
I agree for the most part with what you say, but its a tricky thing talking about spirit and words with words, and with so many varying definitions.
"Sapir" is the Hebrew word for light, and the root of the word "Sipur", meaning story. In many religious texts the soul is described in terms of light. If the soul's purpose is to reveal itself in it's purest form (each individual soul), then breath, language, words... gives us the way in which to do so. The Hebrew word for air, breath or spirit, is Ruach - it is invisible, we cannot see it, as Anton mentions. Through spirit (breath, wind, air) we are able to reveal our soul's light.
I like your "prisms for light" analogy for words. We are all - as individual souls - prisms of light for spirit when we communicate and connect... when we "return spirit" back to itself in our individual way (as in the Bible "And the spirit will return to G-d who gave it." Eccles. 12:7). By allowing spirit to move through us in the form of language and symbols (any act of creating in order to connect with other souls and spirit) we tell our unique "soul stories", thus reveal our inner light.
Yes, I understand and I also agree with you that as individuals we do not need the "middle man", in order to "tap into" spirit, or that which is invisible, timeless and infinite. It is interesting to note the similarities - in essence - of the various religions, however. I was illustrating with the examples (in ancient language and the biblical reference - there are many more) in order to add to or "flesh out" the argument for language giving "voice" to spirit.
it's the non-locality of identity... partially what i wanted to mumble about in your asynchronicity vid. book is asynchrous but it is local. e.g. books one is forced to read in school have their local raison d'etre... etc.
Spirit is one of the words of which the context is everything - every possibility, every eventuality, every. It is what has never changed, and also it is what has always changed. It is not a thing or a phenomenon. It is the truth that exists despite the cynicism, ect, and not just that truth, but the All.
inspire verb (inspired, inspiring)
1to stimulate them into activity, especially into artistic or creative activity.
2 to fill someone with a feeling of confidence, encouragement and exaltation.
3 to create in them.
4 to be the origin or source of.
5 relig said of supposed divine power or influence: to guide or instruct someone. 6 tr & intr to breathe in; to inhale.
ETYMOLOGY: 14c: from Latin inspirare to breathe into.
interesting perspective, the word "resonance" is applicable also is it not.
mistaAnthonyWilson 4 months ago
Yeah, concentrated listening to your breath is all you need to transcend the duality of doing an being. It´s something you do, but it´s also just something that is.
mickmle1 5 months ago
Comment removed
erdal0 5 months ago
Very good vid, Corey.
tranquil87 5 months ago
Wow! Great to watch a second time round - probably one of your finest uploads.
amabodei 5 months ago
read Hazrat Inayat Khan. He has a lecture called "The Power of the Word" which is really nice.
atessmann 5 months ago
in other words.. to emote
the motion of spirit/energy
and whats ever said that isnt first felt to evoke?
boileau88 2 years ago
Awesome
Metanoeia 2 years ago
One of your best video's. Thank you for sharing :)
adznruses 2 years ago
many thanks to you
Professoranton 2 years ago
Theopneustos! Enigmatic logos of Genesis.
adznruses 2 years ago
This is why I believe music to be superior to art. Art is most often a static statement of which we can only register the surface. In contrast, music is a continuous flow of audiable ideas that change and reveal which I find infinitely more satisfying. What is your opinion?
EdwardWhelanPiano 2 years ago
Visual art goes deeper than you admit. Of course it depends on whether the visual artist thinks meaning and depth is significant to art. If one doesn't, then visual art is as bad as you say.
1PostPoMoMaN1 2 years ago
Art seems to spoonfeed us the artist's intentions, (taking for granted that we have the capacity to realise the artists intentions). By knowing a painting we may know the artist, but by knowing a piece of music we come to know the composer and also ourselves.
EdwardWhelanPiano 2 years ago
There are some paintings that point out oneself as well, but these are paintings constructed specifically for that purpose.
1PostPoMoMaN1 2 years ago
language; a beautiful cast of spells.
Words to me, are simple prisms for our infinite light.
We are psychic by nature, words to me, are like an 8bit version of understanding. not communication, understanding hint hint. Words, are linear, reality, is not. So how then are words anything but temporary "prisms" for consciousness?
I agree for the most part with what you say, but its a tricky thing talking about spirit and words with words, and with so many varying definitions.
lysergicaddict 2 years ago
"Sapir" is the Hebrew word for light, and the root of the word "Sipur", meaning story. In many religious texts the soul is described in terms of light. If the soul's purpose is to reveal itself in it's purest form (each individual soul), then breath, language, words... gives us the way in which to do so. The Hebrew word for air, breath or spirit, is Ruach - it is invisible, we cannot see it, as Anton mentions. Through spirit (breath, wind, air) we are able to reveal our soul's light.
LittleBookNook 2 years ago
I like your "prisms for light" analogy for words. We are all - as individual souls - prisms of light for spirit when we communicate and connect... when we "return spirit" back to itself in our individual way (as in the Bible "And the spirit will return to G-d who gave it." Eccles. 12:7). By allowing spirit to move through us in the form of language and symbols (any act of creating in order to connect with other souls and spirit) we tell our unique "soul stories", thus reveal our inner light.
LittleBookNook 2 years ago
True. Such concepts are beautiful no doubt.
Still; there is much to be said, lol, about taking out the middle men SO to speak.
Im not putting down creation or our 'soul stories' by any means, I AM saying it can all be a bit distracting at times.
lysergicaddict 2 years ago
Yes, I understand and I also agree with you that as individuals we do not need the "middle man", in order to "tap into" spirit, or that which is invisible, timeless and infinite. It is interesting to note the similarities - in essence - of the various religions, however. I was illustrating with the examples (in ancient language and the biblical reference - there are many more) in order to add to or "flesh out" the argument for language giving "voice" to spirit.
HealingGaia 2 years ago
This is my other channel, btw... I'm "LittleBookNook" too :)
HealingGaia 2 years ago
Sol briliant its beautiful
JimBootstrap 2 years ago
Thank you so much.
Professoranton 2 years ago
No, I don't think so...
theosophers 2 years ago
it's the non-locality of identity... partially what i wanted to mumble about in your asynchronicity vid. book is asynchrous but it is local. e.g. books one is forced to read in school have their local raison d'etre... etc.
jogayot 2 years ago
Nice. Literacy introduces a kind of repetition with the ability to point to that which is reproduced. Sound is trickier than this.
Professoranton 2 years ago
Having seen this video, I can certainly say that I still haven't got the slightest clue about what the hell the word spirit means.
RadicalAwesomeness 2 years ago
Spirit is one of the words of which the context is everything - every possibility, every eventuality, every. It is what has never changed, and also it is what has always changed. It is not a thing or a phenomenon. It is the truth that exists despite the cynicism, ect, and not just that truth, but the All.
1PostPoMoMaN1 2 years ago
And the all is the One, and the One is the None, and the None alone truely is... that is the one and the all and the none.
1PostPoMoMaN1 2 years ago
sound is reality its all a frequiancy
richardmccaul 2 years ago