do not at any cost, let any of your governments use nukes as weapons or deterents.in the end it will go bang. just look at history,men fighting wars for money.FOR FUCKING MONEY,YOUR LIVES FOR MONEY.dont feed into it. iran is freaked.revolution in countries around it,europe expanding.threats from america and britain. im irish thats what i see.and i have nightmares for us all.destroy all nukes they benefit no one.
@WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 Women doesn't get raped in east. Its in the US and western people were all of the sick minded people that rape and kill people not the east. The drugs and the pedophiles and stalkers are all in the west the sick minded.
IRAN SHOULD GET THERE NUCLEAR PROGRAM AND EVEN NUKES , BECAUSE THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO PROVED HOW IRRISPPOSABLE THEY R BY HAVING NUKES ARE THE AMERICANS BY NUKEING HIROSHIMA , SO BY ALL MEANS GO AHEAD IRAN HAVE THEN BECAUSE IM SURE YOUR A SANE NATION,
THESE BRITISH AND AMERICANS STILL DONT GET IT , PEOPLE DO NOT BELIEVE U ANY MORE , U LOST ALL CREDITBILITY, im pretty sure youl cause some kind of evil soon and tell everyone , you see we told u so. we read u like a book.
The reason conflict & terisum continues in the middle east is because of the 1916 British & French Sykes-Picot agreement.
This Agreement handed over control of Syria, Lebanon & Turkish Cilicia to the French. Palestine, Jordan & areas around the Persian Gulf & Baghdad to the British. While neither France nor Britain actually owned these territories, they were to effectively control them at a governmental & administrative level. Google: Time for a Syria-Israel-Lebanon Peace
britains weak they already lost in afghanistan 3 times soon it will be the fourth time brown is gay he is not even britain he american listen to his accent
@mrafghanwarrior1 i wish that retard Brown was American but sadly it isn't true hes British as for what we do in Afghanistan think again son we are slaughtering the rag heads by the thousands .
not true in 1982 the british fighted alone against argentina and they were outnumberd on the ground at sea and in the air 10 to one and they still anialated them... its all about training and quality
I'm tired of posting this but look -- the world isn't what it was in 1942 or even 1982. The UK nor any other country in Europe are weak militarily but DO NOT pretend for a second that the UK would be fine if all of Europe were to stand back (an impossibility) and let Russia get past Paris. Again, it won't happen but if there no UN, no NATO, no US, and all of Europe turned a blind eye the UK wouldn't be stomped but within weeks England wouldn't be worth fighting for.
You guys take online comments and turn them into university debates. That comment I made 4 months ago was harsh but true -- and I live in the US. Really think about it, when was the last time a LONE US or UK took on a country that had half the war time ethics of both countries, that doesn't care about civilian lives, and that fights ANYWHERE? It would be a different fight for both countries when any domestic street corner is fair game.
The British would beat the Russians easily, don't underestermate the small rock in the north pacific! you need to read up your CIA world fact book again friend. The UK spends the second most amount of money on there defense and military in the world including military science and technology... the British also have there ballistic missile interceptor to deal with any Russian nuclear missiles they might launch at the UK, the UK is also one of the five most richest country's in the world!
North Pacific? What's in the North Pacific? Japan? We're talking about England dude, not Asia. Now, the US spends more than UK and can't end terror in Iraq or Afghanistan where they're fighting people with 30 year old AK-47s and surplus ammo. It's not the money spent , it's the tactics. the UK would not 'Easily win' , it would be a battle . The UK has much less land to lose before the war would start to look bleak. If it's about money why doesn't the US win every war within 3 days?
sorry i ment north atlantic. The united kingdom is an iland and i dont think the british goverment would send over troops until they have got rid of the russian airforce and navy as it is an iland. And as it is an iland its like a fortress and is easy to defend where as russia is a huge country so it is much harder to defend and only a third of russia is actually inhabited.
and the reason why the US and UK are not succeeding in iraq and afganistan is because they are fighting an enermy that they cant see as they hide with in civilians like cowards, if the US and UK had a war with a country like russia then they will be faceing a millitary that they could see but might find resistance after the russians are defeated. this is whats going on in iraq, the british and americans have taken out sadams millitary and now its just pockets of ressitance.
UK nor USA will win a war when Iraqi or afgan troops hide behind civilians in the streets and trow boms and let of rounds at UK or USA troops.
the only way to win a war like that would be mass killings of civilians, but that wouldnt be fair on any one to have to slaughter inocent people, it isnt fair on our boys to do that.
its a tuff situation were fighting an army who use civilian crowds as body armour.
now put UK in a situation where the enemy fights open and lol UK would easily win
Britain has the best soldiers in the world. The US wouldn't win easy against the russians, but with the whole population with us, and "British Grit" we would win, be sure of that. Britain is stronger than we look, even if we are being invaded by damn paki immigrants.
Man, you're just a twat. Listen to yourself; 'British Grit' sign your dunb arse up to the army and go give some 'British Grit' and an arm and maybe paralyse yourself and after that, when you've killed a few 'paki' kids maybe you won't dicuss throwing the population into war like its some friggin video game.
Are you forgetting that the commonwealth is not under our rule anymore? Or the Empire as you still call it - still white power rules eh. Forgotten also that we created the commonealth out of inading and murdering for centuries and made ourselves strong by making others weak.
did u not read anything i wrote? if there was NO USA and NO UNITED NATIONS there would have been no pressure on Great Britain to decolonise, thus the commonwealth would still be the empire in some form. And what we did to establish an empire was common practise with practicaly ALL expanding and empire building nations in the 18th and 19th centurry!
The war with Iraq, Iran are just exensions of these. We said after Iraq that you can't import democracy it muct be gained and won by the people that live in that country. This has been proved with Iran; and should they united ask for asssitance then UN should make the decision to help not us and certainly not 'danshappy' above.
Not completely true mate,Germany are no mugs and you forget, us Brits and France have nukes.Any country silly enough to take on Britain would still get a fucking good fight even if it was the Ruskies
Germans aren't mugs no, neither is the UK, US, France or the rest of Europe but for as strong as these countries are they don't fight wars one-on-one anymore. A war between the UK and Iran wouldn't only involve those two. It would pit half the west against half the east. For one, do you think Brown is speaking on behalf of the UK in this video? He's not, this is the US and Israel speaking through him.
gotta give the British respect. they have one of the most badass counterterrorist forces on the planet the SAS. greetings from the USA and God bless the U.K. :)
Well, I think that Rodney King said it best, "Can't we all just get along"!
Stop and think for just a minute that if everyone in the world would lose the attitudes and just get along with one another. How much better would the world would be regardless of where you are from. Just a dream I know but it sure would be nice.
How can you take a british guy seriously, I mean, their accent is so ridiculous, just imagine if you were a soldier fighting a british guy, you'd be rofling all over the place because I mean, you'd laugh at someone going "Oi, yank, yank, yank, yank, you yanks, because reading all the youtubers from britain calling everyone a yank.
I'm speaking on behalf og Great Britain and all her citizens. We'll kick your ass!!!!!!!!!! If it does come to war, your facing the 6 most powerful nations on the planet.
u ass all ur queen does is take tax payer money ....fuck the queen on behalf of ireland. england has a history of rapping other weaker countries but there running out thats why u need to go all the way to iraq to fight a shit weak country
your royal family, and government raped ireland all on their own ,with paid soldiers.same for scotland dont yu know your history.fuck the queen and her arms dealing family.o dont you know what prince charles gets up to for a few quid on the side. invading dividing and stripping countries of their resources.destabilising countries,for money to pay for weapons.you live on a giant aircraft carrier for america, thats all england is
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I would like to say on behalf of the Iranian nation that british prime minister is an Israeli/Zionist puppet and agent and that he can shove his warnings up his rear end.
What the fuck they have got by the way what can you say about that u asshole england or usa or france israel controls over them they are just stones
MrBuubaaye 7 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
how would I know now? you just removed ur comments.
BlackShadow2009 8 months ago
@Rocketpeace1
you should distinguish between the people and the governments.
BlackShadow2009 8 months ago
do not at any cost, let any of your governments use nukes as weapons or deterents.in the end it will go bang. just look at history,men fighting wars for money.FOR FUCKING MONEY,YOUR LIVES FOR MONEY.dont feed into it. iran is freaked.revolution in countries around it,europe expanding.threats from america and britain. im irish thats what i see.and i have nightmares for us all.destroy all nukes they benefit no one.
rmiley38 10 months ago
Yeah the middle east cant have them because they are the middle east right?
fuck you england.
You have thousands of nukes and so does the USA,
At every moment of the day the united states has 14 nukes ready to launch at any minute.
codmod55 1 year ago
WELL SAID GORDON BROWN!!!
FUCK AHMADINEJAD, THE AYATOLLAH AND ALL THEIR APOLOGISTS
As I write, women are being raped in Evin Prison. This crackpot theocracy is a threat to the world.
LONG LIVE SECULAR IRAN
WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 1 year ago
@WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 Women doesn't get raped in east. Its in the US and western people were all of the sick minded people that rape and kill people not the east. The drugs and the pedophiles and stalkers are all in the west the sick minded.
TeamBahrain 1 year ago
This Gordon Brown is the Most Wanted Terrorist of the World
rational1512 1 year ago
IRAN SHOULD GET THERE NUCLEAR PROGRAM AND EVEN NUKES , BECAUSE THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO PROVED HOW IRRISPPOSABLE THEY R BY HAVING NUKES ARE THE AMERICANS BY NUKEING HIROSHIMA , SO BY ALL MEANS GO AHEAD IRAN HAVE THEN BECAUSE IM SURE YOUR A SANE NATION,
jangaplanet 1 year ago 2
@jangaplanet
nuking Hiroshima and ENDING WW2.
WORLD8NSH5KNIGHT1 1 year ago
ANYTHING THAT BRITS OR AMERICANS SAY IS NOT BELIEVED ANYMORE , HELL AND IM AMERICAN . PEOPLE NOW SEE YOUR PROPAGANDA AND UNDERSTAND WHAT U GUYS DO.
jangaplanet 1 year ago
THESE BRITISH AND AMERICANS STILL DONT GET IT , PEOPLE DO NOT BELIEVE U ANY MORE , U LOST ALL CREDITBILITY, im pretty sure youl cause some kind of evil soon and tell everyone , you see we told u so. we read u like a book.
jangaplanet 1 year ago
IRAN ONT LISTEN TO THEM, ITS A THREAT
jangaplanet 1 year ago
HEY PRIME MINISTER STOP THREATENING PEOPLE OR BE REMOVED .
jangaplanet 1 year ago
Shut up, Brown, you faggot loving socialist piece of shit.
MyDoominateR 1 year ago
The reason conflict & terisum continues in the middle east is because of the 1916 British & French Sykes-Picot agreement.
This Agreement handed over control of Syria, Lebanon & Turkish Cilicia to the French. Palestine, Jordan & areas around the Persian Gulf & Baghdad to the British. While neither France nor Britain actually owned these territories, they were to effectively control them at a governmental & administrative level. Google: Time for a Syria-Israel-Lebanon Peace
gkgreger 2 years ago
britains weak they already lost in afghanistan 3 times soon it will be the fourth time brown is gay he is not even britain he american listen to his accent
mrafghanwarrior1 2 years ago
@mrafghanwarrior1 i wish that retard Brown was American but sadly it isn't true hes British as for what we do in Afghanistan think again son we are slaughtering the rag heads by the thousands .
deadeye012006 1 year ago
fuckin old bastard supporting baby killers
abz3751678 3 years ago
go ahead blair kiss that israelassi
swamimans 3 years ago
not true in 1982 the british fighted alone against argentina and they were outnumberd on the ground at sea and in the air 10 to one and they still anialated them... its all about training and quality
PEARCE1992UK 3 years ago
I'm tired of posting this but look -- the world isn't what it was in 1942 or even 1982. The UK nor any other country in Europe are weak militarily but DO NOT pretend for a second that the UK would be fine if all of Europe were to stand back (an impossibility) and let Russia get past Paris. Again, it won't happen but if there no UN, no NATO, no US, and all of Europe turned a blind eye the UK wouldn't be stomped but within weeks England wouldn't be worth fighting for.
thiscantbesustained 3 years ago
You guys take online comments and turn them into university debates. That comment I made 4 months ago was harsh but true -- and I live in the US. Really think about it, when was the last time a LONE US or UK took on a country that had half the war time ethics of both countries, that doesn't care about civilian lives, and that fights ANYWHERE? It would be a different fight for both countries when any domestic street corner is fair game.
thiscantbesustained 3 years ago
The British would beat the Russians easily, don't underestermate the small rock in the north pacific! you need to read up your CIA world fact book again friend. The UK spends the second most amount of money on there defense and military in the world including military science and technology... the British also have there ballistic missile interceptor to deal with any Russian nuclear missiles they might launch at the UK, the UK is also one of the five most richest country's in the world!
PEARCE1992UK 3 years ago
North Pacific? What's in the North Pacific? Japan? We're talking about England dude, not Asia. Now, the US spends more than UK and can't end terror in Iraq or Afghanistan where they're fighting people with 30 year old AK-47s and surplus ammo. It's not the money spent , it's the tactics. the UK would not 'Easily win' , it would be a battle . The UK has much less land to lose before the war would start to look bleak. If it's about money why doesn't the US win every war within 3 days?
thiscantbesustained 3 years ago
sorry i ment north atlantic. The united kingdom is an iland and i dont think the british goverment would send over troops until they have got rid of the russian airforce and navy as it is an iland. And as it is an iland its like a fortress and is easy to defend where as russia is a huge country so it is much harder to defend and only a third of russia is actually inhabited.
PEARCE1992UK 3 years ago
and the reason why the US and UK are not succeeding in iraq and afganistan is because they are fighting an enermy that they cant see as they hide with in civilians like cowards, if the US and UK had a war with a country like russia then they will be faceing a millitary that they could see but might find resistance after the russians are defeated. this is whats going on in iraq, the british and americans have taken out sadams millitary and now its just pockets of ressitance.
PEARCE1992UK 3 years ago
UK nor USA will win a war when Iraqi or afgan troops hide behind civilians in the streets and trow boms and let of rounds at UK or USA troops.
the only way to win a war like that would be mass killings of civilians, but that wouldnt be fair on any one to have to slaughter inocent people, it isnt fair on our boys to do that.
its a tuff situation were fighting an army who use civilian crowds as body armour.
now put UK in a situation where the enemy fights open and lol UK would easily win
Englishcunts 3 years ago
Britain has the best soldiers in the world. The US wouldn't win easy against the russians, but with the whole population with us, and "British Grit" we would win, be sure of that. Britain is stronger than we look, even if we are being invaded by damn paki immigrants.
danshappy 3 years ago
Man, you're just a twat. Listen to yourself; 'British Grit' sign your dunb arse up to the army and go give some 'British Grit' and an arm and maybe paralyse yourself and after that, when you've killed a few 'paki' kids maybe you won't dicuss throwing the population into war like its some friggin video game.
r1c8e12 2 years ago
if there was no US UN or NATO the UK would have no choice but to become a strong power, might just hold its own in that case
danowest 3 years ago
"if there was no US UN or NATO the UK would have no choice but to become a strong power, might just hold its own in that case "
???? i dont under stand?? the UK is one of 5 of the worlds great powers
USA, UK, France Russia and china.
when oush comes to shove the UK has proven to come out on top, and the UK will allways have her commonwealth and the USA on her side
Englishcunts 3 years ago
yes but if the was NO USA, how could she be on our side if shes not there?
plus with no USA or UN it would be the commonwealth, it would be the empire, this is how we would make ourselves a strong power, understand now?
danowest 3 years ago
*it wouldnt be the commonwealth
danowest 3 years ago
Oh yes I got you now, I just didnt understand the way you wrote it before, sorry.
lol gee am I a dumb ass!!
Englishcunts 3 years ago
Are you forgetting that the commonwealth is not under our rule anymore? Or the Empire as you still call it - still white power rules eh. Forgotten also that we created the commonealth out of inading and murdering for centuries and made ourselves strong by making others weak.
r1c8e12 2 years ago
did u not read anything i wrote? if there was NO USA and NO UNITED NATIONS there would have been no pressure on Great Britain to decolonise, thus the commonwealth would still be the empire in some form. And what we did to establish an empire was common practise with practicaly ALL expanding and empire building nations in the 18th and 19th centurry!
danowest 2 years ago
The war with Iraq, Iran are just exensions of these. We said after Iraq that you can't import democracy it muct be gained and won by the people that live in that country. This has been proved with Iran; and should they united ask for asssitance then UN should make the decision to help not us and certainly not 'danshappy' above.
r1c8e12 2 years ago
Not completely true mate,Germany are no mugs and you forget, us Brits and France have nukes.Any country silly enough to take on Britain would still get a fucking good fight even if it was the Ruskies
arthurwhittle 3 years ago
Germans aren't mugs no, neither is the UK, US, France or the rest of Europe but for as strong as these countries are they don't fight wars one-on-one anymore. A war between the UK and Iran wouldn't only involve those two. It would pit half the west against half the east. For one, do you think Brown is speaking on behalf of the UK in this video? He's not, this is the US and Israel speaking through him.
thiscantbesustained 3 years ago
gotta give the British respect. they have one of the most badass counterterrorist forces on the planet the SAS. greetings from the USA and God bless the U.K. :)
Reaganmarine 3 years ago
hi anyone want to chat
want to chat with singles 1J
GlenEllynNigga23 3 years ago
this video was good
i liked this video :) pa
895Paddy 3 years ago
Well, I think that Rodney King said it best, "Can't we all just get along"!
Stop and think for just a minute that if everyone in the world would lose the attitudes and just get along with one another. How much better would the world would be regardless of where you are from. Just a dream I know but it sure would be nice.
Djennings16 3 years ago
I didnt know france was a world power... lol
friedchickennigga 3 years ago
How can you take a british guy seriously, I mean, their accent is so ridiculous, just imagine if you were a soldier fighting a british guy, you'd be rofling all over the place because I mean, you'd laugh at someone going "Oi, yank, yank, yank, yank, you yanks, because reading all the youtubers from britain calling everyone a yank.
roflwaffles777 3 years ago
I'm speaking on behalf og Great Britain and all her citizens. We'll kick your ass!!!!!!!!!! If it does come to war, your facing the 6 most powerful nations on the planet.
Long live the Queen.
Long live Britain.
GreatBritainJM 3 years ago
u ass all ur queen does is take tax payer money ....fuck the queen on behalf of ireland. england has a history of rapping other weaker countries but there running out thats why u need to go all the way to iraq to fight a shit weak country
jackonmsn 3 years ago
hey us english didnt rape ireland all on our own, the scots and welsh helped to! in fact so did some irish.
LONG LIVE THE QUEEN
danowest 2 years ago 3
@danowest I AGRRE, WELL SAID
djnomisdaboss 1 year ago
your royal family, and government raped ireland all on their own ,with paid soldiers.same for scotland dont yu know your history.fuck the queen and her arms dealing family.o dont you know what prince charles gets up to for a few quid on the side. invading dividing and stripping countries of their resources.destabilising countries,for money to pay for weapons.you live on a giant aircraft carrier for america, thats all england is
rmiley38 10 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bring it on gordon ...you will never beat allahs army
AllahsCreation 3 years ago
Ezekiel 38
TUInHighDef 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Brits are like an old blind dog that are barking to his tail.
artbiz45 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I would like to say on behalf of the Iranian nation that british prime minister is an Israeli/Zionist puppet and agent and that he can shove his warnings up his rear end.
Goodfellow62 3 years ago