The Hebrew is actually Machmadim not MUHAMMADdim. The fact that you are forced to usea false translation really shows how silly this video is going to be.
While there are more 3 prophecies fitting Muhammad in te Bible. Deutronomy 18:18, and the nature Muhammad illiterate receives revelation placed into his mouth by divine intervention and is from among the brethren (Ishmaelite). In John 14:26 I explained spirit is prophet using the test 1:john:4 verse 3 and then I also used John 1:25 to show you 3 distinct prophets were awaited!! I COULD SHOW MORE
so you are saying that the lover of solomon was a male. IS that what you are saying ? Are you then saying that solomon was gay ? You do know that he had 700 wives and 200+ concubines, right ?
no one has mentioned this although it seems very obvious:
in view of the probable date of composition for this book (almost regardless of what school you follow), if it mentions muhammad, prophet of islam, that presupposes some presentience on the author's part. this is fine if one ascribes divine authorship to it, or even sees the book as the work of a prophetic solomon character, but this is neither proven, nor a very popular idea in academic circles. paece al
Songs of Songs chapter 5 is written by the wife of Solomon and she is talking about him!Songs of Songs is a wedding song honoring marriage it is not about Muhammad.Sorry to say it but you have false doctrine.
and jesus is david grand grand.... son so that's mean solomon is jesus grand grand grand....father too
the funny thing is muhammad story is long long time after jesus story, then how solomon know about muhammad....???? how he sing about person the one doesn't exist yet...!!!
do they have time machine back then..???hahahahhahaha
There is no prophecy in there. Muhammad was a descendant of the sin child Ishmael, who was produced when Abraham decided not to trust God and have sex with his maidservant instead of his wife. To Ishmael was born the Islamic middle east nations. This book (boring?!?! Are you kidding me?) is easily one of the most beautiful descriptions of love and courtship that I have ever read. It is between Solomon and his future/present (they get married halfway through the book) wife. That's all.
If a rose is mentioned in an English poem, we shouldn't jump to the conclusion that a woman or girl NAMED Rose is meant. There first has to be support for that in the context, textual and/or cultural.
Just for the record, the reason why we dont accept the bible is CUZ man have messed around with the tex!!! My Professor told, back in the days, when christaint got stronger in Europe, it was going to over throw the kingS, so they accepted christant and "Revised The Book"; THe kings made them self Divine
This verse could NEVER be Muhammad because it is written the PRESENT TENSE; furthermore it's estimated to have been written by Solomon between 970-930 BC. Are we supposed to believe that the bride would wait over 1500years for her beloved (supposedly Muhammad born AD 570) to appear? PLEASE!!!
This passage in NO WAY can mean mohammed. The woman is talking about her lover. That's what this Book is about, the relationship of two lovers! By the way, Acts 3:20-26 is the fulfillment of Deut. 18:18. Please read it for yourself. The Bible says nothing about mohammed. thank you!
are you then saying that solomon's lover was a MALE ? was solomon a GAY ? You DO KNOW that solomon had 700 wives and 200+ concubines right ? This clearly speaks about a beloved and friend who is a MALE. If this MALE was his lover, then apparantly solomon was a gay. Was he ? I don't think so.
Is it just a coincidence that Prophet Muhammed's exact name appears in the bible ?
Are you blind or are you really denying the obvious ?
Sura 61:6 states Jesus gave good tidyings of the coming of a messenger after him whose name will be Ahmad or the praised one for Muslims and the Holy Spirit for Christians but Jesus said the Holy Spirit would come to comfort his disciples who were to face persecution and it came days after Jesus went to the cross not 500 years later and Jesus said the Holy Spirit of Truth LIVES in all people on earth which proves it was never Muhammad thus proving by Muh's own words,he was a false prophet
lol the Sura is supporting us, you should not find any contradictions in Quran.
Anyway we are on the religion of Ibrahim PBUH who was submitting, and he was a Muslim who believed in the One God.
This is what Jews Christians Muslims Agreed about, which proves that any son of God is false. no need to prove from bible or Quran because this is what prophet Muhammad said.
Again Islam is not the name of the religion it is the description that mean submmition to One God.
i didnt got your point !! how god will send a false prophet ? that will never happened..jewish kept saying that coz the last prophet (mohhamad peace be upon hem) is arabian and they wont hem to be from them ..
Actually, 61:6 doesn't say anything about the "Holy Spirit" for Christians.
It just says that Jesus (pbuh) told people his people of the coming of Muhammad (pbuh).
How do you explain Muhammad's name mentioned in hebrew "Muhammadim" with the suffix "-im" as a plural of respect. Because there is a plural of respect, it is obvious they inappropriately translated his name! "Altogether lovely" should have just been left as "Muhammadim". You can't translate names!
Song of Song is a metaphor of God's love for his people,it has no commercial breaks in it, in which God says,by the way I will contradict myself to allow a non Jew to be a prophet and he will claim the bibles of both the Jews and Christians were falsified so that he can promote Islam
Muhammad was NEVER mentioned in any Bible on earth
Bible wasnt translated in to Arabic at the time of Prophet Muhammed and he knew no other langauge than Arabic , so its just rubbish and ignorance to say that he coppied the bible. may Allah show the right path to non belivers.
But he was nlettered unable to read and write yet he brought a consistent revelation remaining unchanged for 1400 yrs while the Christian Pauline Gospel is not consistent and riddled with contradiction and additions and ommissions.
The Qur'an has obviously plagiarised from the Jewish Talmud and Gnostic Christian doctriens. This has been clearly documented whereby the Qur'an includes KNOWN WORKS OF FICTION as if they were factual gospels.
This is documented in the book, "The Original Sources of the Qur'an" by Tisdall
it seems like many people here are straying away from the matter in hand. Muhammad's name is a passive participle of the second derived, so-called D stem (d for doubled second radical) of the root h m d(sorry i cant do a dot underneath the h i but you undertsand what letter it is im sure), the hebrew word in question is a plural of a noun derived from the same root (albeit in Hebrew), and, despite apparent similarites, would best be compared with an Arabic form mahaamid (pl of mahmad). peace al
indeed these interpretations are not impossible. nonetheless the a vowel (patax) on the first mem precludes this being the hebrew equivaelent of the pattern that makes muhammeds name- a pual particule- which would require a shwa (no vowel) on the mem preformative (the other vowels: you would need a form like MXuMad (pl MXuMDYM)). One importnat thing is that the most simple explanation is often the most liekly - no need to find a tenous explanation when the existing ones make sense peace al
What the hell do you mean. HAHAHA Why are idiots posting messages without even bothering to watch carefully my video!! It's frustrating. Read the description, watch the video CAREFULLY again, and then read the comments. If you still have questions about the goal of the video, then you need some help man.
YOU IDIOT. I have to do a version FOR DUMMIES, since you don't get it.
I say THAT'S THE ARGUMENT DEEDAT ET AL. HAVE OFFERED, then I say JUST FOR THE SAKE OF THE ARGUMENT let's accept it, if the name of the Prophet is there, then let's see if the CONTEXT confirms that. The context DOES NOT support the claim that the word "Muhammad" fits in the verse.
Incorrect understanding of the poem , the song describe Mohammed , Faith and how the author see his lover who must be naturaly faithfull,beautifull and trusty like Mohammed(sws)
ibrahim27, your childish laughter is annoying, but I most certainly believe that you fear Christian opinion! Islam is not only a faith of killing but one of fear as well, judging by your character.
AHAHAHA. Watch the video and you'll see you just made a fool of yourself, please watch it hahaha. You're missing the point or just posted a message without even watching the entire video.
NIV version is wicked in kjv its locks that were mentioned not hair......wickedness changing the truth....yesss locks!!!!! ppl who fear us call them dread locks look in the kjv ya' self
Zarabbas. . .1 John 4:1-3 says that anyone who believes Jeus is from God but those who don't are not from God. It never talks about Muhammed and in fact it says that he's an antichrist for not believing in Jesus (God)
In the Book of John - Chapter One: The pharisees approach our beloved prophet shaheed YaYa (AS) - John the Baptist and ask him;
1. Are you Elijah? - a prophet who disappeared
2. Are you the Messiah
3. Are you "that prophet"
Christians - please tell me "who is THAT PROPHET". After Saiyudina Jesus (pbuh) did you have Another Prophet? - I say yes he was the one riased from the brethren of the Israelites - an Ishmaelite a see dof Abraham - he was Muhammad (SAW)
A book which teach you to love everyone, love your enemy, that is our teaching not kill those don't follow bible or Jesus. Its teach about peace it show the love of God and Human reaction to his call. Bible never say anything about Muhammed as its just a creation of caliphate in 7AD. The Lord name is Unknown as he is mysterious and eternal
As Christian believe it's the unity between church and Jesus Christ, and Mystic believes it's the union between two soul and reach towards the God's divine love. But it never say anything about a prophet born in Arabia, the fundamental reason for that there is no need because of the confusion it create among the people, there is no need for a book God doesn't even need a book to tell what he is. He is love, that is what our great book teach us,
Song of Song, according to Jewish tradition it's the unity between Jewish people and God (nothing to do with anyone else) God is showing its love as a lover or as a Husband (Jewish tradition show different view of love, fatherhood, as a King, Husband, etc...) its simply different view of God's love (as muslims don't understand this because they believe God is God it can't be any one which I believe a genuine mistake God could be anything because he is God)
The english translation or any other translation of a poem is worthless. Why dont you read the original hebrew/aramaic version.
There is no woman involved in this song in question. Written by the kings himself.
This is a poem (5), the beginning make you think he is talking about a woman, in the middle he is talking about a "HE" not "she" and the description are quiet manly marble, lebanese tree.. and at the end he reveals the name..
Read our original scripture not the translations.. shalom
May God Almighty open your heart and eyes to his signs and show you the right path. All I can say is a request that atleast read Quran once before contesting Islam's accuracy.
very good work, ibrahim27. You easily win the debate.
One other thing you should note is that the lover is drinking wine, which mohammed forbad, so if it is the (false) prophet mohammed, he is exposed as a hypocrite by the bible.
you can't understand a story if you don't read the whole thing, it's just like reading the end of something and skiping the beginning of a story. it donse't work out :) even you send just speak about SS 5:16 you can't fullyly understand it unless you ready the whole thing. then it will make sence to you :)
let us not argue each other. I think we all just talk just what we heard. Lets go back and take the scriptures and learn it. read both the bible and the Quran by yourself. I have done it. It really changed me. We can c what is real. May peace be on all of you. May God guide us all.
How could the Bible have been tampered with? There were hundreds of copies of it, in many different translations, all over the world. For a "tampering" to be accepted, all the people who owned these copies would have had to collude with each other. Why would they? Some were Jewish, some were Christian, they would have torn holes out of each other if they'd caught each other tampering with it!
This passage is a lesson about marriage. The Shulamite is Solomon's lover and she is describing him throughout the passage and later in verses 10-16 in other words as saying Solomon is cheif among ten thousand (another way of saying "He is the best of the best."
Good. Now read 5:16 carefully. Try reading a few translations. It is not a love letter. There is more to it if you read deeply. This song has a deep meaning. Some Christians say that the "Altogether lovely" is King Solomon, some say it is Jesus. You can decide for yourself.
i have read the quran with an open mind. it is drivvel. the only reason moslems believe it is because their prayer is a mind control technique and they have no objectivity. Plus they will be murdered by their relatives for waking up from the deception.
the book is obsessed with punishing "evil-doers" for committing the same crimes moh (hellfire be upon him) and his criminal gang love doing. shameful
firstly read popshopgirly message, i think dude your misunderstanding this, remember in the bible it says that you should not rely on the testimony of just one witness :) and if you think it's been changed then look into Dead Sea Scrolls they are a perfect match to the bible of today, also look at the 5000 Manuscripts of the new testerment if you have any questions just ask and i'll Email you the ture diffrences of both the holy quran and the bible :) are you game...
lolz, any prof :)guess not... ok let me try to show you prof that the bible hasn't been changed, look into the dead Dead Sea Scrolls and the 5000 manuscripts of the new testerment. hmm if you want we can Email each other about this ^^ thats if your game. i just really want to see why you think the bible has been tampered, in the bible it says that you should not rely on the testimony of just one witness. if you have any questions just on the bible just Email me.
You need to do a little more research. The Dead Sea Scrolls are causing problems by the tons for modern Christianity...and now I don't want to email each other so don't bother offering. Just do some research besides the first 1 or 2 links that show up in a web search. There are some real issues for Christianity that have resulted by the finding of the D.S.C....and some of them are not so good for Christianity.
so maybe you in your wisdom could tell us what tons of problems the D.S.C are causing the Christians. And plz link would be nice and I have never heard anything of the kind
You're totally missing the point that the book is a progression of a maiden who is to be wed (1:1-3:5), who then marries (3:6-5:1), and how their marriage matures over time (5:2-8:4)Last time I checked, Muhammad didn't marry a Hebrew maiden 400 years out of his age range...
o.k., Explain to me the objective basis for putting Muhammad into the text. Is it because it "could" make sense to put him in there or do you have any legitimate cross refrences?
no i think popshopgirly is right, if you read the whole story it's about the marriage between two people. his kinda got a point there, maiden "400 years" oO.
Woooooow.... That's taken SO out of context. For one thing, Solomon is mentioned by NAME in the book, plus there are references throughout the book about the bride-to-be having contact with Solomon himself (3:6-11). If she is living in the time period of Solomon, how is it even POSSIBLE for the book to be talking about Muhammad as the lover??
Wow, ibrahim27, I am impressed: 5/5! Yes, you rightly read Canticles 5:16, verbal noun taken from Hebrew hamad. I've warned Muslims not to misread Bible, makes them look foolish & desperate. The only prophet predicted in Bible is Jesus the Christ; no others are cited by name in advance. So if Muhammed were a prophet, it's not necessary to predict him. One must evaluate a prophet claimant by PROPHESY CONTENT (teaching, not prediction) per Deut 18 & Jeremiah 25ff. Well done, ibrahim27!
You see, The Qur'an mentions in Surah Al-Araf chapter 7 verse 157: "Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered Prophet, whom they find mentioned in their own (scriptures) in the law (the Torah) and the Gospel". And we find Muhammad in the old testament by name; So where is the truth... I think that it's efficient to proove that Qur'an is the word of Allah (swt)
wahiduAllah, aka son of Allah, 7.157 doesn't mean illiterate, it means that the person RECEIVES New Word. That person is Jesus the Christ, Moses predicted Him to show the Genesis 3:15 promise would be fulfilled; because Messiah=Christ=God-man, YH+WH.
No other prophet is predicted by name in Torah or Injeel. Don't fret about this. We are to evaluate any claimant including Jesus, by WHAT he claims to have gotten from God, not by whether he is predicted.
Most of the Malay Muslim at the eastern never never read Bible,but they get peace with islam.And I wonder why our prophet is mentioned by name in ur Book,but why u deny it?
what is wrong with you? watch the video. the whole chapter starts with verse 1, "I have drunk my wine and my milk". Does mohammed drink wine? open your tiny mind and look at the evidence instead of remaining in your brainwashed little world.
HERE IS MY QUESTION FOR THE MUSLIMS. YOU GUYS BOAST ABOUT THE BIBLE BEING CORRUPT, so what does it matter if the word MUHAMMADIM is in the bible? after all it is corrupt. But i forgot ALLAH choses what ever verses he wants from the Torat, and NEW TEST right?, SHUKRAN brother, you have shed light on this argument. i pray that you find the TRUTH and see how muslims go to great extent to prove muhammad in the bible, when they just make themselves look like fools! ha!----Shalom Aleychem
Same happens with other groups, like the messianic jews (jews for jesus) who go to great extent as well to prove that jesus is the messiah and other say he was even a god!! Go figure!
Jerusalem, pining for Muhammad? No. But for argument sake let's assume that it refers to Muhammad just because the Hebrew sounds like the name Muhammad. Thus let's examine the other places where we found this Hebrew word and replace it with Muhammad. The word is machmad, or desirable.
1 Kings 20:6-"They will seize everything you Muhammad and carry it away.
2. they barter their Muhammad for food to keep themselves alive
Yes it is about mohammad. Why not? because mohammad was not born in this time? First think and than write because the original bible also comes from the ALMIGHTY and so he knows that Mohammad will come because he will send him.
you just state that as if it changes everything. There is nothing wrong with healthy debate. You have just made 2 statements with nothing backing them up.
thanks how many muslims have watched this video? I mean since they still insist that it's abt muhammad, and you have to excuse us because we're so use to hear that it's muhammad so sorry for our mistake ok?
it's a song about lovers, but I guess you wouldn't know that, since you said so yourself; it's annoying to read even part of a chapter. read more before you write and people will care more about what you write - just a thought...
Song of Song is a story of a man and woman's love for each other used as a metaphor to illustrate God's love for his people
In this ancient story,God never said and by the way,I will contradict myself and hint to you that even though I said no prophet was to come through Ishmael,I will make an exception for Muh was hated the Jews and who couldn't speak their language and who would say the bible was falsified.
i now believe 100 percent that it was Muhammad peace be upon him which is mentioned in the song of solomon, specially when it says he is shyining between 10thousand which is the number of the believers when they opened mecca by God's help with no sword! and his hadiths are all magnificent that is why his mouth is sweetness its self, and so on.
Yes, Makka was conquered because the pagan tribe of Quraish broke the truce that it had digned witht he Muslims. The 28 (which is actually 8 people) that died, died because they commited crimes. Also in your case, I highly doubt only 28 pagan Arabs lived in Makkah. Therefore, the pagan Arabs lived peacefully witht eh Muslims. And when they saw this mercy, they converted. Thats how it really happened.
I live how you write the Prophet names and Ahadeeth to mix poison with honey, obviously you are delusional, i suggest to you type in youtube "Converts to Islam" and see whom are converting. Just last night i watched for 20 minutes an IRISH woman that was teaching in the church converted to Islam here is the link
Watch my other videos about SoS and tell me where I "delusional". But please watch them all FIRST (3 videos in total), then post a video response. Thanks!
a false prophet who denies the father and the son. So, the bible clearly warns us of antichrists like Muhammad and tells us not to follow other gospels which contradict the bible, like the qu'ran.
Your first sentence is a contradiction in science, the bible, and language. There is no father and son to deny--and Mohammad does not appear in the bible anywhere (he is 300 years after the bible was codified in 335 AD/CE)
I'm telling you.. i am christan.. i know the bible well.. MUHAMAD IS NOT IN THE BIBLE.. WHAT EVER YOU DO YOU WILL NOT FIND HIM ! SO STOP THAT "MUHAMAD IN THE BIBLE.." HE WILL NEVER BE
Another thing.. you say that the bible is wrong and you take what ever you want from it and say that it's right and it talks about muhamad??? what are you doing.. dont you have anything else to play with..
In Arabic it's not muhamadem!!!.. it's something that you want.. anyway muhamad it means in arabic when i say thanx to god i say "nehmed alla" muhamad is here too?? DUUUHHH
u ai'nt know nofink bout ISLAM n Prophet( may the Peace and blessing of Allah be upon him)is not Allah(s.w.t),talking bout Allah(s.w.t)is even mentioned Hes name in the Bible.u inliterated.
I know Islam is a false religion because Jesus said that he is the only way to the father, but yet Muslims try to earn their way to heaven by good deeds.
That is why Jesus died on the cross as atonement for sins, and he rose again defeating death so that all may enter heaven by him and only by him.
Never said Muhammad was Allah but he was a prophet of Allah. Allah is not mentioned in the bible as Allah is not the God of the bible.
I can proof from the Bible that Jesus was not Crusified,and if u watch CHRIST the movie,focus on when they crusified Jesus(p.b.u.h) on the Cross He said Ellah...Ellah(wich means Allah) God means nothing because u can play games wid it God-Father,God's,Goddes etc... The best name for The Creater is Allah neither a male or female name He's name is pure.
Of course you can't prove he was not crucified, he was crucified - that is an established historical fact. He said "Eli, Eli, why have you forsaken me?" That means God, not Allah. Jesus never said Allah once. How does it mean nothing just because we can add an s, or add 's? - absolute nonsense. Oh really, does name really matter. The only thing that matters if your worshipping a false God like Allah or worshipping the true God.
u r so stupid i have no idia how 2 explain u,Tell me wot da real language of the Bible and wot was Jesus(p.b.u.h) Mother Tounge?English?the ansa is (NO) The word God is made by Human(British). In the Language of Hebbrew There is no such a thing as (God).Think B4 u talk.
The original languages of the Bible were Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic. It has been translated into English so that we can understand the word of God. The qu'ran is not the word of God because it is full of contradictions and scientific errors. Please don't die in your sins.
There is no ROMAN or other secular documentation, including the books of Josephus, that any Jesus was crucified. The crucifixion is not an established historical fact--it is fiction.
You are just showing your ignorance. Any educated man or woman will agree that a man lived 2000 years ago named jesus who appeared to do amazing things and he was crucified. This evidence comes from non christian sources such as jewish (who would have been against him) scholars. The debate occurs when christians claim that he rose from the dead. So pick your fights arthuride!
u tryin' 2 make fun of Islam o wot? i had 2 say,Coz He's means Wot belongz 2 Allah(s.w.t)u cant say Allah(s) there is no such a fink as Allah(s).BUT God(s) means more than 1 God u inliterated should i teach u English now o wot?May Allah (s.w.t)guide u.
You are correct--there is no Allah, and NO God, No Trinity, No Jesus--all are fiction created by knaves and those who prey on the guilibility of others so they do not have to work.
There is no Allah, but there is a God who wants all to be saved from hell, and thats why he gave his only son Jesus. You can't deny the facts: he definately lived, definately died on the cross, and definately came back to life. I hope you accept God's gift of grace before you die or you will be in hell wishing you did.
Where is there scientific proof of the existence of any god, or historical records (not the bible, as you cannot prove the veracity of a book quoting the same book) that there ever was a Jesus written at the time he allegedly lived.
Jesus never said he is the only way--that was added 73 years after the original text. Jesus never died on the cross as he was in a garden and the witnesses were "far away" --it was a hoax. The god of the bible is plural (elohim) and means gods and goddesses--even Jehovah had a wife: Asherah. Better read your bible again--like the Quran it is fiction and plagarized from far older sources (Babylonian etc)
Genesis 1 and 2 do not have the same order of creation (a world myth before science was allowed to study reality, forbidden by religious zealots protecting ancient myths)
Genesis 1 provides a chronological order of creation. The tasks of each day are for our knowledge of the creation account. Genesis 2 is not a chronological account, nor is there anything in the text which would cause us to consider it to be. It is noteworthy that in Genesis 2, Moses records the works of God's creation in relation to man.
Better read the order of creation again. Moses is fiction, as he even records his own death and burial. Neat trick--and it is not in Genesis in the Bible or Torah. The Torah is the work of courtly retainers who amused themselves by writing the fiction of the books much like the Decameron.
Nothing has been added to the orginal text because the bible has never been changed. It perfectly matches the dead sea scrolls and has been preserved By God for nearly 2000 years. = All the events actually happened, and all the words were actually said. It is an established historical fact that Jesus died on the cross so don't deny it. It is plural because of the 3 natures of God.
I helped translate fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls--and nothing supports the Bible. No event in the Bible actually happened and there is no established historical proof that Jesus lived or died--and the trinity (natures) of god are the invention of the Council of Nicea called by the Emperor Constantine. You need to study more.
Thank you for making this video.
crazyaboutsquirrels 3 years ago
Muhammad lived in the 8th century. I don't think the Song was written thereafter, so I find this whole debate confusing.
thesquonkstear 3 years ago 28
La illahha ilallah muhammad rasulallah
ccstar5 3 years ago 212
The Hebrew is actually Machmadim not MUHAMMADdim. The fact that you are forced to usea false translation really shows how silly this video is going to be.
sexyarii 3 years ago 25
definitely not muhammed in that verse.
but if muslims want to see him in there, by all means see him there, whatever turns you on!
my favourite book in the bible
PoetryEater 3 years ago
5:16 does not have muhammads name in it. unless his name is 'lovely'. pretty girly name for a man....
er...no. definitely not mohammed.
my favourite book in the bible by far.
i encourage muslims to read it, and if they want to see mohammed in it, go for it, whatever turns you on!
PoetryEater 3 years ago
While there are more 3 prophecies fitting Muhammad in te Bible. Deutronomy 18:18, and the nature Muhammad illiterate receives revelation placed into his mouth by divine intervention and is from among the brethren (Ishmaelite). In John 14:26 I explained spirit is prophet using the test 1:john:4 verse 3 and then I also used John 1:25 to show you 3 distinct prophets were awaited!! I COULD SHOW MORE
ALANSARALHAQ 3 years ago 4
so you are saying that the lover of solomon was a male. IS that what you are saying ? Are you then saying that solomon was gay ? You do know that he had 700 wives and 200+ concubines, right ?
The verse 5:16 in songs of solomon reads,
"Hikko Mamittakim we kullo Muhammadim Zehdoodeh wa Zehraee Bayna Jerusalem."
and you are saying that this is a coincidence ? that the exact name of a coming prophet reads exactly as it is in bible ?
It's clear solomon is not talking about his lover but his friend
Dexty322 3 years ago
good vid. simple clear explanenation keep up the good work may god bless you
mikerubiano 3 years ago
MOSES prophet of GOD make MIRACLES in name of GOD to proof he was in TRUTH
JESUS make Miracles by his own POWER cause HES GOD he die to make all of us free of SIN an enter into eternal LIFE and be safe from HELL
Mohamad didnt was jew didnt make miracles cause death and division, SEEK THE TRUTH
cublop 3 years ago
muhammed is found NOWHERE in the Holy Bible. Fact!
DaughterOfYashua 3 years ago 5
peace be upon him muhammad sal allahe wasalam
ARIAAI 3 years ago
no one has mentioned this although it seems very obvious:
in view of the probable date of composition for this book (almost regardless of what school you follow), if it mentions muhammad, prophet of islam, that presupposes some presentience on the author's part. this is fine if one ascribes divine authorship to it, or even sees the book as the work of a prophetic solomon character, but this is neither proven, nor a very popular idea in academic circles. paece al
madalpeters 3 years ago
get a grip on realality
simonhuddersfield 3 years ago
nutter... my lover is runny and I think you need to get a grip...
simonhuddersfield 3 years ago
i heart this
hey just msg me! G8
Polospt09 3 years ago
on a real dude, that was the biggest load of crap ive ever seen, that does'nt proove nothing looooooool
bludinit 3 years ago
Songs of Songs chapter 5 is written by the wife of Solomon and she is talking about him!Songs of Songs is a wedding song honoring marriage it is not about Muhammad.Sorry to say it but you have false doctrine.
saint858 3 years ago
this dude is so funny
solomon is david son
and jesus is david grand grand.... son so that's mean solomon is jesus grand grand grand....father too
the funny thing is muhammad story is long long time after jesus story, then how solomon know about muhammad....???? how he sing about person the one doesn't exist yet...!!!
do they have time machine back then..???hahahahhahaha
zhukent 3 years ago
There is no prophecy in there. Muhammad was a descendant of the sin child Ishmael, who was produced when Abraham decided not to trust God and have sex with his maidservant instead of his wife. To Ishmael was born the Islamic middle east nations. This book (boring?!?! Are you kidding me?) is easily one of the most beautiful descriptions of love and courtship that I have ever read. It is between Solomon and his future/present (they get married halfway through the book) wife. That's all.
rmstudent7 3 years ago
If a rose is mentioned in an English poem, we shouldn't jump to the conclusion that a woman or girl NAMED Rose is meant. There first has to be support for that in the context, textual and/or cultural.
BesACB 3 years ago
now Zionists and satanists war on God and mohammed war on islam and true religions
hamou87 3 years ago
Just for the record, the reason why we dont accept the bible is CUZ man have messed around with the tex!!! My Professor told, back in the days, when christaint got stronger in Europe, it was going to over throw the kingS, so they accepted christant and "Revised The Book"; THe kings made them self Divine
cube12083 3 years ago
This verse could NEVER be Muhammad because it is written the PRESENT TENSE; furthermore it's estimated to have been written by Solomon between 970-930 BC. Are we supposed to believe that the bride would wait over 1500years for her beloved (supposedly Muhammad born AD 570) to appear? PLEASE!!!
DaBlackhand1975 3 years ago
who do u think its refering to then?? coz it does say Mohammad.
1rle 3 years ago
This passage in NO WAY can mean mohammed. The woman is talking about her lover. That's what this Book is about, the relationship of two lovers! By the way, Acts 3:20-26 is the fulfillment of Deut. 18:18. Please read it for yourself. The Bible says nothing about mohammed. thank you!
Christbepraised 3 years ago
Muhammad sws didnt drink wine.
LailaMujahidah 3 years ago
He means Grape wine, not Alcohol wine
Bunfire123 3 years ago 2
are you then saying that solomon's lover was a MALE ? was solomon a GAY ? You DO KNOW that solomon had 700 wives and 200+ concubines right ? This clearly speaks about a beloved and friend who is a MALE. If this MALE was his lover, then apparantly solomon was a gay. Was he ? I don't think so.
Is it just a coincidence that Prophet Muhammed's exact name appears in the bible ?
Are you blind or are you really denying the obvious ?
Dexty322 3 years ago
the title of the book you refer to is called song of 'Solomon' - so it makes sense that it refers to Solomon not Muhammaed
tr0y81 3 years ago 5
i don't think that a prophet would sing and song about himself.
Bakkuto 3 years ago
do you mean psalm 16? because psalm 16 has only 12 parts... please clarify if I were mistaking!
althakafi 3 years ago
he reffers to the song of songs, song of salomon, qohelet, or simply isnt in some versions of the Bible.
RuajEsh 3 years ago
Sura 61:6 states Jesus gave good tidyings of the coming of a messenger after him whose name will be Ahmad or the praised one for Muslims and the Holy Spirit for Christians but Jesus said the Holy Spirit would come to comfort his disciples who were to face persecution and it came days after Jesus went to the cross not 500 years later and Jesus said the Holy Spirit of Truth LIVES in all people on earth which proves it was never Muhammad thus proving by Muh's own words,he was a false prophet
BonjourNuit37 3 years ago 6
lol the Sura is supporting us, you should not find any contradictions in Quran.
Anyway we are on the religion of Ibrahim PBUH who was submitting, and he was a Muslim who believed in the One God.
This is what Jews Christians Muslims Agreed about, which proves that any son of God is false. no need to prove from bible or Quran because this is what prophet Muhammad said.
Again Islam is not the name of the religion it is the description that mean submmition to One God.
Bakkuto 3 years ago 4
BonjourNuit37
a false prophet????
i didnt got your point !! how god will send a false prophet ? that will never happened..jewish kept saying that coz the last prophet (mohhamad peace be upon hem) is arabian and they wont hem to be from them ..
engg0girl 3 years ago 22
BonjourNuit37:
Actually, 61:6 doesn't say anything about the "Holy Spirit" for Christians.
It just says that Jesus (pbuh) told people his people of the coming of Muhammad (pbuh).
How do you explain Muhammad's name mentioned in hebrew "Muhammadim" with the suffix "-im" as a plural of respect. Because there is a plural of respect, it is obvious they inappropriately translated his name! "Altogether lovely" should have just been left as "Muhammadim". You can't translate names!
boredguy299 3 years ago 63
Song of Song is a metaphor of God's love for his people,it has no commercial breaks in it, in which God says,by the way I will contradict myself to allow a non Jew to be a prophet and he will claim the bibles of both the Jews and Christians were falsified so that he can promote Islam
Muhammad was NEVER mentioned in any Bible on earth
BonjourNuit37 3 years ago
Bible wasnt translated in to Arabic at the time of Prophet Muhammed and he knew no other langauge than Arabic , so its just rubbish and ignorance to say that he coppied the bible. may Allah show the right path to non belivers.
faakhir24 3 years ago
But he was nlettered unable to read and write yet he brought a consistent revelation remaining unchanged for 1400 yrs while the Christian Pauline Gospel is not consistent and riddled with contradiction and additions and ommissions.
ALANSARALHAQ 3 years ago
The Qur'an has obviously plagiarised from the Jewish Talmud and Gnostic Christian doctriens. This has been clearly documented whereby the Qur'an includes KNOWN WORKS OF FICTION as if they were factual gospels.
This is documented in the book, "The Original Sources of the Qur'an" by Tisdall
sexyarii 3 years ago
WE NEED AUDIO OF THE HEBREW SONGS OF SOLOMON CHAPTER 5!!!
xkv mmtqym vklv mxmdym zh dvdy vzh rjy bnvt yrvslm.
(Transliterated verse 16)
I don't know who to read hebrew (no vowels in that transliteration).
faro0485 3 years ago
it seems like many people here are straying away from the matter in hand. Muhammad's name is a passive participle of the second derived, so-called D stem (d for doubled second radical) of the root h m d(sorry i cant do a dot underneath the h i but you undertsand what letter it is im sure), the hebrew word in question is a plural of a noun derived from the same root (albeit in Hebrew), and, despite apparent similarites, would best be compared with an Arabic form mahaamid (pl of mahmad). peace al
madalpeters 3 years ago
i agree, however, is it possible that the pl is a sign of respect or that this could be referring to the people of mahamad
akatkhouda 3 years ago
indeed these interpretations are not impossible. nonetheless the a vowel (patax) on the first mem precludes this being the hebrew equivaelent of the pattern that makes muhammeds name- a pual particule- which would require a shwa (no vowel) on the mem preformative (the other vowels: you would need a form like MXuMad (pl MXuMDYM)). One importnat thing is that the most simple explanation is often the most liekly - no need to find a tenous explanation when the existing ones make sense peace al
madalpeters 3 years ago
Ibrahim27, why are you so intent on lying?
ExposingDeedat 3 years ago
What the hell do you mean. HAHAHA Why are idiots posting messages without even bothering to watch carefully my video!! It's frustrating. Read the description, watch the video CAREFULLY again, and then read the comments. If you still have questions about the goal of the video, then you need some help man.
ibrahim27 3 years ago 30
Now watch me disprove your stupidity in one line:
THE WORD YOU ARE CLAIMING TO BE 'MUHAMMADIM" IS ACTUALLY "MACHMAD" (PRONOUNCED MAHK-MAWD).
You are an idiot.
sexyarii 3 years ago
YOU IDIOT. I have to do a version FOR DUMMIES, since you don't get it.
I say THAT'S THE ARGUMENT DEEDAT ET AL. HAVE OFFERED, then I say JUST FOR THE SAKE OF THE ARGUMENT let's accept it, if the name of the Prophet is there, then let's see if the CONTEXT confirms that. The context DOES NOT support the claim that the word "Muhammad" fits in the verse.
If you don't get it, then you're retarded.
ibrahim27 3 years ago 30
Incorrect understanding of the poem , the song describe Mohammed , Faith and how the author see his lover who must be naturaly faithfull,beautifull and trusty like Mohammed(sws)
laghza1 3 years ago
This sounds like porn!
kab1r 3 years ago
ibrahim27, your childish laughter is annoying, but I most certainly believe that you fear Christian opinion! Islam is not only a faith of killing but one of fear as well, judging by your character.
SwordofManticorE 3 years ago
ALANSARALHAQ, how can any Christian answer your question with this cowardly sensorship.
SwordofManticorE 3 years ago
ALL of your comments have been posted. Where's my "cowardly sensorship"? Butthead!!
ibrahim27 3 years ago
My answer, NO!!!
SwordofManticorE 3 years ago
What I love about this conspiracy is that there is no Hebrew word 'Muhammadim'. The word is actually 'Machmad", and adjective.
No matter what context you put it in, the facts remain that the word is a false translation spread by Deedat and later to Naik.
And looking at your summary, you really aren't too familiar with the life of Solomon, are you?
sexyarii 3 years ago
AHAHAHA. Watch the video and you'll see you just made a fool of yourself, please watch it hahaha
ibrahim27 3 years ago
I did watch it. Care to point out this obvious point?
I think it is you using a fake translation of a word which is you making a fool of yourself.
Grab an OT Hebrew dictionary then come back to me.
sexyarii 3 years ago
How can you be so stupid. Watch the freaking video and read the description in case is NOT clear enough. I don't have to make my video fo "dummies"
ibrahim27 3 years ago
Learn Hebrew before you spread more lies.
ExposingDeedat 3 years ago
Watch the video and read the description before you make a fool of yourself.
ibrahim27 3 years ago 10
OK, I speak Hebrew as a native language -
I read this verse now from the Bible, in HEBREW -
"Hikko mamtakim, v'chulo MAHMADIM. Zeh dodi ve'zeh re'i, bnot Yerushalayim"
Mahmadim = מחמדים = sweethearts; charm, in Hebrew. Where the hell did you come up with mUhammad?
Man , this is pathetic.
DISCOnnected90 3 years ago 2
AHAHAHA. Watch the video and you'll see you just made a fool of yourself, please watch it hahaha. You're missing the point or just posted a message without even watching the entire video.
ibrahim27 3 years ago
OK, I speak Hebrew as a native language -
I read this verse now from the Bible, in HEBREW -
"Hikko mamtakim, v'chulo MAHMADIM. Zeh dodi ve'zeh re'i, bnot Yerushalayim"
Mahmadim = מחמדים = sweethearts; charm, in Hebrew. Where the hell did you come up with mUhammad?
Man , this is pathetic.
DISCOnnected90 3 years ago
It is not his fault he does not understand Hebrew but pretends to.
UltimateMuslimWarrio 3 years ago
Stupid, you didn't watch the video or didn't read the description. Do it if you are honest.
ibrahim27 3 years ago
NIV version is wicked in kjv its locks that were mentioned not hair......wickedness changing the truth....yesss locks!!!!! ppl who fear us call them dread locks look in the kjv ya' self
SOJAHSAID 3 years ago
youre an idiot
the letter of song of songs its from king solomon
GO JESUS!!!
MitchellLLockert 3 years ago 2
i really doubt it.
BestVideosEver01 3 years ago
Zarabbas. . .1 John 4:1-3 says that anyone who believes Jeus is from God but those who don't are not from God. It never talks about Muhammed and in fact it says that he's an antichrist for not believing in Jesus (God)
bacardibum 3 years ago
YES! I agree that Muhammad is mentioned very clearly in the Bible. I encourage you to read
Matt. 7:15-16
2 Peter 2:1
1 John 4:1-3
I have even more proof that Muhammad is mentioned in the Bible.
Zarabbas 3 years ago 2
lol ye those verses clearly mention muhammad
bmp5star 3 years ago
In the Book of John - Chapter One: The pharisees approach our beloved prophet shaheed YaYa (AS) - John the Baptist and ask him;
1. Are you Elijah? - a prophet who disappeared
2. Are you the Messiah
3. Are you "that prophet"
Christians - please tell me "who is THAT PROPHET". After Saiyudina Jesus (pbuh) did you have Another Prophet? - I say yes he was the one riased from the brethren of the Israelites - an Ishmaelite a see dof Abraham - he was Muhammad (SAW)
ALANSARALHAQ 3 years ago
You really that stupid?
ChomFa 3 years ago
You are correct:)
sexyarii 3 years ago
A book which teach you to love everyone, love your enemy, that is our teaching not kill those don't follow bible or Jesus. Its teach about peace it show the love of God and Human reaction to his call. Bible never say anything about Muhammed as its just a creation of caliphate in 7AD. The Lord name is Unknown as he is mysterious and eternal
mystiklife 3 years ago
As Christian believe it's the unity between church and Jesus Christ, and Mystic believes it's the union between two soul and reach towards the God's divine love. But it never say anything about a prophet born in Arabia, the fundamental reason for that there is no need because of the confusion it create among the people, there is no need for a book God doesn't even need a book to tell what he is. He is love, that is what our great book teach us,
mystiklife 3 years ago
Song of Song, according to Jewish tradition it's the unity between Jewish people and God (nothing to do with anyone else) God is showing its love as a lover or as a Husband (Jewish tradition show different view of love, fatherhood, as a King, Husband, etc...) its simply different view of God's love (as muslims don't understand this because they believe God is God it can't be any one which I believe a genuine mistake God could be anything because he is God)
mystiklife 3 years ago
The english translation or any other translation of a poem is worthless. Why dont you read the original hebrew/aramaic version.
There is no woman involved in this song in question. Written by the kings himself.
This is a poem (5), the beginning make you think he is talking about a woman, in the middle he is talking about a "HE" not "she" and the description are quiet manly marble, lebanese tree.. and at the end he reveals the name..
Read our original scripture not the translations.. shalom
67zionboy73 3 years ago 2
May God Almighty open your heart and eyes to his signs and show you the right path. All I can say is a request that atleast read Quran once before contesting Islam's accuracy.
alladin22sf 3 years ago
you know what this is somthing that a normal person like us has wrote and you can't say mohammad drank wine!
starsara100 3 years ago
May Allah reward u brother
dcfnfb 3 years ago
hope taht u know that the bible was changed. The proof: EROTIC IN HE BOOK OF GOD??? Its enough that his name is inside..
Genc85 3 years ago
You are assuming , I am not , THis is Not about Muhamed . Drink wine , yea right ,
Sammy0414 3 years ago
very good work, ibrahim27. You easily win the debate.
One other thing you should note is that the lover is drinking wine, which mohammed forbad, so if it is the (false) prophet mohammed, he is exposed as a hypocrite by the bible.
yewt 3 years ago
All muslims say the bible is corrupt but wait..maybe MoHamHead is mentioned in this part, the bible is corrupt except here..HA HA HA HA Jackasses
aperisions 3 years ago 3
you can't understand a story if you don't read the whole thing, it's just like reading the end of something and skiping the beginning of a story. it donse't work out :) even you send just speak about SS 5:16 you can't fullyly understand it unless you ready the whole thing. then it will make sence to you :)
bladezored 3 years ago
let us not argue each other. I think we all just talk just what we heard. Lets go back and take the scriptures and learn it. read both the bible and the Quran by yourself. I have done it. It really changed me. We can c what is real. May peace be on all of you. May God guide us all.
mohaah04 3 years ago
How could the Bible have been tampered with? There were hundreds of copies of it, in many different translations, all over the world. For a "tampering" to be accepted, all the people who owned these copies would have had to collude with each other. Why would they? Some were Jewish, some were Christian, they would have torn holes out of each other if they'd caught each other tampering with it!
thessalonian71 3 years ago
Well done. Now prove to us that Jesus was mentioned in the old testament.
tudungsenduk 3 years ago
He wasn't. I'm not a christian BTW.
ibrahim27 3 years ago
This passage is a lesson about marriage. The Shulamite is Solomon's lover and she is describing him throughout the passage and later in verses 10-16 in other words as saying Solomon is cheif among ten thousand (another way of saying "He is the best of the best."
detroittigsbaby 3 years ago 2
Good. Now read 5:16 carefully. Try reading a few translations. It is not a love letter. There is more to it if you read deeply. This song has a deep meaning. Some Christians say that the "Altogether lovely" is King Solomon, some say it is Jesus. You can decide for yourself.
tudungsenduk 3 years ago
read the holy Quran in an open mind...
osmantan1 3 years ago
i have read the quran with an open mind. it is drivvel. the only reason moslems believe it is because their prayer is a mind control technique and they have no objectivity. Plus they will be murdered by their relatives for waking up from the deception.
the book is obsessed with punishing "evil-doers" for committing the same crimes moh (hellfire be upon him) and his criminal gang love doing. shameful
yewt 3 years ago
Sweetheart...
had you been in that era..
your views wouldn't have been the same.
But I believe you belong to a place/family where other religions are treated like trash without even trying to apply lil brains.
vibration4u 3 years ago
thanks for showing how bible has been tampered overtime that it makes little sense!
suggestion: You've read Bible, also have A look at Qur'an as well. Must you be not disappointed!
Peace and thanks for the effort and the sharing BTW.
pakismine 3 years ago
arrhh if your thinking of converting talk to mezzzz :P ask me any qeustion and i'll give you your answer
bladezored 3 years ago
firstly read popshopgirly message, i think dude your misunderstanding this, remember in the bible it says that you should not rely on the testimony of just one witness :) and if you think it's been changed then look into Dead Sea Scrolls they are a perfect match to the bible of today, also look at the 5000 Manuscripts of the new testerment if you have any questions just ask and i'll Email you the ture diffrences of both the holy quran and the bible :) are you game...
bladezored 3 years ago
lolz, any prof :)guess not... ok let me try to show you prof that the bible hasn't been changed, look into the dead Dead Sea Scrolls and the 5000 manuscripts of the new testerment. hmm if you want we can Email each other about this ^^ thats if your game. i just really want to see why you think the bible has been tampered, in the bible it says that you should not rely on the testimony of just one witness. if you have any questions just on the bible just Email me.
bladezored 3 years ago
You need to do a little more research. The Dead Sea Scrolls are causing problems by the tons for modern Christianity...and now I don't want to email each other so don't bother offering. Just do some research besides the first 1 or 2 links that show up in a web search. There are some real issues for Christianity that have resulted by the finding of the D.S.C....and some of them are not so good for Christianity.
key2understanding 3 years ago
Listen, if the Dead Sea Scrolls had anything at all to prove against Christianity, it would be all over the media the whole time.
We'd never hear the end of it...
But what we see is hardly a mention of them, because the happen to prove that we still have the same Scriptures after all these years.
And muslims are wrong too for saying that we have corrupted Scriptures.
Their own book was corrupted the minute if left muhammed's mouth... i.e. it was never the word of God.
Ammyai 3 years ago
am
AMEN my friend we still have the same scriptures as back then the D.S.C proves it.
hannahr77 3 years ago
key
so maybe you in your wisdom could tell us what tons of problems the D.S.C are causing the Christians. And plz link would be nice and I have never heard anything of the kind
hannahr77 3 years ago
lol, yes they prove that the bible hasnt changed at all since for ever. thats not so much of a problem, more of a good sign.
BestVideosEver01 3 years ago
You're totally missing the point that the book is a progression of a maiden who is to be wed (1:1-3:5), who then marries (3:6-5:1), and how their marriage matures over time (5:2-8:4)Last time I checked, Muhammad didn't marry a Hebrew maiden 400 years out of his age range...
popshopgirly 3 years ago
Don't be so stupid. Next time watch the video before making a fool of yourself.
ibrahim27 3 years ago
o.k., Explain to me the objective basis for putting Muhammad into the text. Is it because it "could" make sense to put him in there or do you have any legitimate cross refrences?
tltltgwath 3 years ago
no i think popshopgirly is right, if you read the whole story it's about the marriage between two people. his kinda got a point there, maiden "400 years" oO.
bladezored 3 years ago
yer your right, :o
bladezored 3 years ago
Woooooow.... That's taken SO out of context. For one thing, Solomon is mentioned by NAME in the book, plus there are references throughout the book about the bride-to-be having contact with Solomon himself (3:6-11). If she is living in the time period of Solomon, how is it even POSSIBLE for the book to be talking about Muhammad as the lover??
popshopgirly 3 years ago
Wow, ibrahim27, I am impressed: 5/5! Yes, you rightly read Canticles 5:16, verbal noun taken from Hebrew hamad. I've warned Muslims not to misread Bible, makes them look foolish & desperate. The only prophet predicted in Bible is Jesus the Christ; no others are cited by name in advance. So if Muhammed were a prophet, it's not necessary to predict him. One must evaluate a prophet claimant by PROPHESY CONTENT (teaching, not prediction) per Deut 18 & Jeremiah 25ff. Well done, ibrahim27!
brainouty 3 years ago
the "holly" prophet. Ha
I love typos!
Great vid :) x
kpnuts2k 3 years ago
You see, The Qur'an mentions in Surah Al-Araf chapter 7 verse 157: "Those who follow the Messenger, the unlettered Prophet, whom they find mentioned in their own (scriptures) in the law (the Torah) and the Gospel". And we find Muhammad in the old testament by name; So where is the truth... I think that it's efficient to proove that Qur'an is the word of Allah (swt)
wahiduAllah 3 years ago
wahiduAllah, aka son of Allah, 7.157 doesn't mean illiterate, it means that the person RECEIVES New Word. That person is Jesus the Christ, Moses predicted Him to show the Genesis 3:15 promise would be fulfilled; because Messiah=Christ=God-man, YH+WH.
No other prophet is predicted by name in Torah or Injeel. Don't fret about this. We are to evaluate any claimant including Jesus, by WHAT he claims to have gotten from God, not by whether he is predicted.
brainouty 3 years ago
Most of the Malay Muslim at the eastern never never read Bible,but they get peace with islam.And I wonder why our prophet is mentioned by name in ur Book,but why u deny it?
diekaNr 3 years ago
what is wrong with you? watch the video. the whole chapter starts with verse 1, "I have drunk my wine and my milk". Does mohammed drink wine? open your tiny mind and look at the evidence instead of remaining in your brainwashed little world.
yewt 3 years ago
HERE IS MY QUESTION FOR THE MUSLIMS. YOU GUYS BOAST ABOUT THE BIBLE BEING CORRUPT, so what does it matter if the word MUHAMMADIM is in the bible? after all it is corrupt. But i forgot ALLAH choses what ever verses he wants from the Torat, and NEW TEST right?, SHUKRAN brother, you have shed light on this argument. i pray that you find the TRUTH and see how muslims go to great extent to prove muhammad in the bible, when they just make themselves look like fools! ha!----Shalom Aleychem
YshuaShmaMoshiach 3 years ago
Same happens with other groups, like the messianic jews (jews for jesus) who go to great extent as well to prove that jesus is the messiah and other say he was even a god!! Go figure!
Salaam (Shalom)!!
ibrahim27 3 years ago
Jerusalem, pining for Muhammad? No. But for argument sake let's assume that it refers to Muhammad just because the Hebrew sounds like the name Muhammad. Thus let's examine the other places where we found this Hebrew word and replace it with Muhammad. The word is machmad, or desirable.
1 Kings 20:6-"They will seize everything you Muhammad and carry it away.
2. they barter their Muhammad for food to keep themselves alive
3. and all that we [Muhammad] lies in ruins.
It's not reasonabl
Ajunpryde930 3 years ago
Yes it is about mohammad. Why not? because mohammad was not born in this time? First think and than write because the original bible also comes from the ALMIGHTY and so he knows that Mohammad will come because he will send him.
bloodykurde 3 years ago
It cannot refer to Muhammad.
1. the hebrew word machmad means "lovely" and is by no means a reference to a (non-jewish) prophet!
2. song of salomon is PORNOGRAPHIC! So if you think Muhammad is mentioned thereyou scored an own goal.
3. Als Kurde solltest Du eigentlich Yezide sein und nicht so ein dreckiger Moslem!
rapartist43 3 years ago
Masyaallah..There is no God But Allah,And Muhammad is the final Messanger.
diekaNr 3 years ago 2
you just state that as if it changes everything. There is nothing wrong with healthy debate. You have just made 2 statements with nothing backing them up.
kpnuts2k 3 years ago
Song of salomon has nothing to do with Muhammed
muhammed wasnt born in the time song was written the part in the bible that reffers to muhammed is revelation 19:17-21
Chiel1977 3 years ago
Are you a 2 year old baby?
STUPID WATCH THE WHOLE VIDEO. FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS!!
ibrahim27 3 years ago
ibra
thanks how many muslims have watched this video? I mean since they still insist that it's abt muhammad, and you have to excuse us because we're so use to hear that it's muhammad so sorry for our mistake ok?
hannahr77 3 years ago
it's a song about lovers, but I guess you wouldn't know that, since you said so yourself; it's annoying to read even part of a chapter. read more before you write and people will care more about what you write - just a thought...
grumbletiger 3 years ago
Are you a 2 year old baby?
STUPID WATCH THE WHOLE VIDEO. FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS!!
ibrahim27 3 years ago
Song of Song is a story of a man and woman's love for each other used as a metaphor to illustrate God's love for his people
In this ancient story,God never said and by the way,I will contradict myself and hint to you that even though I said no prophet was to come through Ishmael,I will make an exception for Muh was hated the Jews and who couldn't speak their language and who would say the bible was falsified.
BonjourNuit 4 years ago 2
i now believe 100 percent that it was Muhammad peace be upon him which is mentioned in the song of solomon, specially when it says he is shyining between 10thousand which is the number of the believers when they opened mecca by God's help with no sword! and his hadiths are all magnificent that is why his mouth is sweetness its self, and so on.
wisdomuser 4 years ago
BTW: mecca was conquered and according to sahih bukhari 28 persons died by... the sword.
rapartist43 3 years ago
Yes, Makka was conquered because the pagan tribe of Quraish broke the truce that it had digned witht he Muslims. The 28 (which is actually 8 people) that died, died because they commited crimes. Also in your case, I highly doubt only 28 pagan Arabs lived in Makkah. Therefore, the pagan Arabs lived peacefully witht eh Muslims. And when they saw this mercy, they converted. Thats how it really happened.
AhmedtheIV 3 years ago
lkhjlkhj
mothermoore 4 years ago
I live how you write the Prophet names and Ahadeeth to mix poison with honey, obviously you are delusional, i suggest to you type in youtube "Converts to Islam" and see whom are converting. Just last night i watched for 20 minutes an IRISH woman that was teaching in the church converted to Islam here is the link
watch?v=3sW5lvkAsNg
zoom1177 4 years ago
Watch my other videos about SoS and tell me where I "delusional". But please watch them all FIRST (3 videos in total), then post a video response. Thanks!
ibrahim27 4 years ago
Please
PLEASE POST COMMENTS ONLY ABOUT THIS VIDEO. I WON'T ALLOW ANY OFF-TOPIC COMMENTS ANYMORE.
IF YOU WANT TO COMMENT ON ANY OTHER TOPIC PLEASE SEARCH ON YOUTUBE FOR THE TOPIC YOU WANT. THANKS!!
ibrahim27 4 years ago
Muhammad is not anywhere in the bible except as
a false prophet who denies the father and the son. So, the bible clearly warns us of antichrists like Muhammad and tells us not to follow other gospels which contradict the bible, like the qu'ran.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
Your first sentence is a contradiction in science, the bible, and language. There is no father and son to deny--and Mohammad does not appear in the bible anywhere (he is 300 years after the bible was codified in 335 AD/CE)
arthuride 4 years ago
Yes there is, because Jesus is the son of God who died for your sins. Ok, but he is rendered as a false prophet by the bible.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
I'm telling you.. i am christan.. i know the bible well.. MUHAMAD IS NOT IN THE BIBLE.. WHAT EVER YOU DO YOU WILL NOT FIND HIM ! SO STOP THAT "MUHAMAD IN THE BIBLE.." HE WILL NEVER BE
RaJeNeRiEnEs 4 years ago
Another thing.. you say that the bible is wrong and you take what ever you want from it and say that it's right and it talks about muhamad??? what are you doing.. dont you have anything else to play with..
RaJeNeRiEnEs 4 years ago
In Arabic it's not muhamadem!!!.. it's something that you want.. anyway muhamad it means in arabic when i say thanx to god i say "nehmed alla" muhamad is here too?? DUUUHHH
RaJeNeRiEnEs 4 years ago
wrong!. mouahamd is not in the bible he never was
RaJeNeRiEnEs 4 years ago
Idiot! you didn't watch the freaking video. Use your freaking brain!! Don't comment on a video you haven't watched, you're making a fool of yourself.
ibrahim27 4 years ago
i know what i'm talking about.. you dont hae to tell me what u think because it's your opinion.. and thats mine..
RaJeNeRiEnEs 4 years ago
Muhammad is not in the Bible because he was not a prophet of the God of the bible, but of this false God called Allah.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
u ai'nt know nofink bout ISLAM n Prophet( may the Peace and blessing of Allah be upon him)is not Allah(s.w.t),talking bout Allah(s.w.t)is even mentioned Hes name in the Bible.u inliterated.
IloveShaiza 4 years ago
I know Islam is a false religion because Jesus said that he is the only way to the father, but yet Muslims try to earn their way to heaven by good deeds.
That is why Jesus died on the cross as atonement for sins, and he rose again defeating death so that all may enter heaven by him and only by him.
Never said Muhammad was Allah but he was a prophet of Allah. Allah is not mentioned in the bible as Allah is not the God of the bible.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
I can proof from the Bible that Jesus was not Crusified,and if u watch CHRIST the movie,focus on when they crusified Jesus(p.b.u.h) on the Cross He said Ellah...Ellah(wich means Allah) God means nothing because u can play games wid it God-Father,God's,Goddes etc... The best name for The Creater is Allah neither a male or female name He's name is pure.
IloveShaiza 4 years ago
Of course you can't prove he was not crucified, he was crucified - that is an established historical fact. He said "Eli, Eli, why have you forsaken me?" That means God, not Allah. Jesus never said Allah once. How does it mean nothing just because we can add an s, or add 's? - absolute nonsense. Oh really, does name really matter. The only thing that matters if your worshipping a false God like Allah or worshipping the true God.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
u r so stupid i have no idia how 2 explain u,Tell me wot da real language of the Bible and wot was Jesus(p.b.u.h) Mother Tounge?English?the ansa is (NO) The word God is made by Human(British). In the Language of Hebbrew There is no such a thing as (God).Think B4 u talk.
IloveShaiza 4 years ago
The original languages of the Bible were Greek, Hebrew and Aramaic. It has been translated into English so that we can understand the word of God. The qu'ran is not the word of God because it is full of contradictions and scientific errors. Please don't die in your sins.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
son go n read ur Bible o ask an Older o an Scholar of Bible He ws not Crusified.
i will reply 2 u tmr when i am guna hav' da refrences.peace be on you
IloveShaiza 4 years ago
You can't deny the established historical fact that he was crucified.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
There is no ROMAN or other secular documentation, including the books of Josephus, that any Jesus was crucified. The crucifixion is not an established historical fact--it is fiction.
arthuride 4 years ago
You are just showing your ignorance. Any educated man or woman will agree that a man lived 2000 years ago named jesus who appeared to do amazing things and he was crucified. This evidence comes from non christian sources such as jewish (who would have been against him) scholars. The debate occurs when christians claim that he rose from the dead. So pick your fights arthuride!
kpnuts2k 3 years ago
"neither a male or female name"
and then you say
"He's[his] name is pure." HAHA, that was funny!
Brother please comment on SoS only. thanks!!
ibrahim27 4 years ago
u tryin' 2 make fun of Islam o wot? i had 2 say,Coz He's means Wot belongz 2 Allah(s.w.t)u cant say Allah(s) there is no such a fink as Allah(s).BUT God(s) means more than 1 God u inliterated should i teach u English now o wot?May Allah (s.w.t)guide u.
IloveShaiza 4 years ago
There is no Allah in existance to guide anyone.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
You are correct--there is no Allah, and NO God, No Trinity, No Jesus--all are fiction created by knaves and those who prey on the guilibility of others so they do not have to work.
arthuride 4 years ago
There is no Allah, but there is a God who wants all to be saved from hell, and thats why he gave his only son Jesus. You can't deny the facts: he definately lived, definately died on the cross, and definately came back to life. I hope you accept God's gift of grace before you die or you will be in hell wishing you did.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
Where is there scientific proof of the existence of any god, or historical records (not the bible, as you cannot prove the veracity of a book quoting the same book) that there ever was a Jesus written at the time he allegedly lived.
arthuride 4 years ago
how it comes god and dies !!!! do u have brain to think
smaweee 3 years ago
ridiculous statement
hyperqube714 4 years ago
Jesus never said he is the only way--that was added 73 years after the original text. Jesus never died on the cross as he was in a garden and the witnesses were "far away" --it was a hoax. The god of the bible is plural (elohim) and means gods and goddesses--even Jehovah had a wife: Asherah. Better read your bible again--like the Quran it is fiction and plagarized from far older sources (Babylonian etc)
arthuride 4 years ago
Exacty brapp.datz wot i meant.2 da little kid "Rapidfire".Peace be on u.
IloveShaiza 4 years ago
Oh how immature? Calling someone a little kid for telling you the truth.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
u dun no nofink about urself hao u goin' 2 teach me a religion,first of all correct thr101 contradictions in the Bible than talk abou Quran.
IloveShaiza 4 years ago
Sure. Post me some seemed contradictions in the bible and I will show you that they are not actually contradictions.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
Genesis 1 and 2 do not have the same order of creation (a world myth before science was allowed to study reality, forbidden by religious zealots protecting ancient myths)
arthuride 4 years ago
Genesis 1 provides a chronological order of creation. The tasks of each day are for our knowledge of the creation account. Genesis 2 is not a chronological account, nor is there anything in the text which would cause us to consider it to be. It is noteworthy that in Genesis 2, Moses records the works of God's creation in relation to man.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
Better read the order of creation again. Moses is fiction, as he even records his own death and burial. Neat trick--and it is not in Genesis in the Bible or Torah. The Torah is the work of courtly retainers who amused themselves by writing the fiction of the books much like the Decameron.
arthuride 4 years ago
Nothing has been added to the orginal text because the bible has never been changed. It perfectly matches the dead sea scrolls and has been preserved By God for nearly 2000 years. = All the events actually happened, and all the words were actually said. It is an established historical fact that Jesus died on the cross so don't deny it. It is plural because of the 3 natures of God.
Rapidfire220 4 years ago
I helped translate fragments of the Dead Sea Scrolls--and nothing supports the Bible. No event in the Bible actually happened and there is no established historical proof that Jesus lived or died--and the trinity (natures) of god are the invention of the Council of Nicea called by the Emperor Constantine. You need to study more.
arthuride 4 years ago