Those liberal, fruity, hippy, sissy, wimpy, tree hugging, queer, wiccan, jungle loving, trailer trash, occultist, leftist shrimps should BACK OFF. I grew up in the super democratic region of the San Francisco area as an Asian Indian and I STILL experienced prejudice in stores, at school, and in job hunting by the SAME liberal hypocrites that "want" affirmative action. Celebrities, democratic politicians, leftist corporations, college deans & administrators are selfish and classist bitches too.
Jose Angel Gutierrez,"Civil rights leader": “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the
worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”
Kamau Kambon,Africana Studies teacher:"We need to exterminate white people off the face of the planet"
Noel Ignatiev,Harvard professor:"Keep bashing the dead white males,and the live ones,and the females too,until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed."
Everything those anti-whites say and do is in the service of white geNOcide.
Those white geNOcide pushers are trying to say "there is no such thing as race" only for white people in white countries(while demanding anti-white discrimination!).
Where is the "freedom" in these "free countries" to publicly discuss the white demographic elimination(GENOCIDE) caused by "Diversity"?
Truth will out: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
All us pro-white anti-genocide advocates want is a public discussion about the attempt to turn all white countries into non-white countries,but these "tolerant" anti-whites advocate our murder in public view!
"Haters" indeed! Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.
Anti-whites like them support: Africa for the Africans,Asia for the Asians,white countries for EVERYBODY!
Maybe if Saddam Hussein had just flooded the Kurdish villages with non-Kurds,ordered the Kurds to "assimilate" with the non-Kurds to "celebrate diversity",given the non-Kurds "Affirmative action" he could have waited a few decades,wiped out the Kurds as an ethnic group,and no one would have accused him of committing genocide?
It`s so obvious: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
Nobody complains about Saudi privilege in Saudi Arabia
Nobody complains about Japanese privilege in Japan
ONLY in White countries do people complain that White people have privileges in their own country.
ONLY in White countries do Anti-Whites INSIST that we flood our countries with 3rd Worlders,and 'mix' and 'blend' our countries out of existance.ONLY Anti-Whites support this.
This attempt to Turn ALL White countries Brown is GENOCIDE
The bake sale done by the students was designed to get you talking so you can see with your OWN eyes how racist SB 185 is. Admitting students based on race/ethnicity in itself is a RACIST idea.
Unfortunately I think this idea has sailed clear over the heads of the liberals on campus. I feel sorry for the Republicans.
This is all about a law that allows colleges to consider race in admissions. Well let me say it is a great leap foreword for the colleges to acknowledge that race does in fact exist. I do how ever have one question.
How would the anti-White supporting this measure feel if a college took race into consideration and decided to admit more White men?
@Veritatis61 I don't think more or less of any race should be admitted into colleges based solely on race, as I don't think more women or men should be allowed to go to college merely for their gender. Colleges should admit students, who did their best in schools, volunteered in their communities, and wrote a great essay on how they plan to affect the world around them.
@Veritatis61 it is likely to help admit more white men, and this wouldnt bother proponents of the measure in general, but i imagine, whoever is actually anti-white would not like it.
@payasoinfeliz The Colburn study says all though declines and increases should be noted, it should also be noted that the tend to trend with a decrease or increase of the total population. During the decrease of white admissions, there was also a decrease in white population. During the increase in hispanic admissions in Florida there was an increase of hispanic population in Florida. Isn't it possible our colleges merely represent our populations?
Hilarious. The Anti-Whites are caught in such a conundrum, because if they call the bake sale "racist", then that means they are calling "Affirmative Action" "racist". They don't know what to do! So damned funny! xD
@4MyNation actually, no... the bake sale is racist because it is basing the prices on race. if the discounts were given based on the groups having been previously overcharged for the same baked goods as whites, THEN the diversity bake sale pricing wouldve been based on past disparities and not race. affirmative action redresses discrimination, this bake sale is not redressing anything; theres no precedent for the discounts, its just about race.
@4MyNation uh... no... it really has nothing to do with whether anyone is white. it has to do with whatever you got before. if whites had gotten overcharged, they wouldve gotten a discount--it comes down to what has been done in the past, not what color you are. in reality, today, affirmative action benefits whites the most, since women are the biggest minority group, making up over half of the us population, and about 3 fourths of them are white... lol
@4MyNation no, im in favor of affirmative action because it combats racism. whether whites benefit has no bearing on whether im in favor of it at all. as it happens, they are the primary beneficiaries, but this is no a problem or a boon.
@payasoinfeliz If anyone else believes that Affirmative Action is here for the BENEFIT OF WHITES, I've got some land in Arizona I'd like to sell you. You're just trying to justify Anti-White policies.
@4MyNation you think your doubt or ignorance on a subject means you know something? it doesnt. women are a protected minority group: fact. the overwhelming majority of women in the usa are white: fact. its not hard to understand. when affirmative action was done away with in california, do you know what happened? asians were admitted to college at higher rates; whites were not--in fact, whites were admitted to college at lower rates after they stopped affirmative action. its not rocket science.
@4MyNation thats like some kid saying his mom had a gender quota, because she gave his sister an extra 10 bucks allowance, after having given him 10 more than her the previous week. "you only gave her more this week because shes a girl, mom! that is sexist! you hate boys and so gave me less!" mom: "no, son... she got more this time because you got 10 more than her last week... i wouldve done the same for you, a boy, if you were shortchanged. its not about your penis..."
@payasoinfeliz As in your example you are talking about redressing for the actual victim, affirmative action is like saying because your 16th great grand dad only received $1 dollar allowance and my 16th great grand dad received $5 dollars allowance that you should receive $4 dollars until you have received what your 16th great grand dad was shorted.
@Lady0Pamela affirmative action (aa) redresses current trends; its not like reparations where people are compensated for inequities of generations past. aa mostly applies to sex and race, but i think religion and sexual orientation are admissible; i suppose any trait tied to demonstrable trends of discrimination could be factored in. im saying white admissions decreased post-aa. asians... that would depend on whether theyre being admitted in higher numbers because theyre asian.
@payasoinfeliz So blacks & hispanics are admitted into schools less because they are black & hispanic not because of grades, test scores, population ratio or ability to afford college? Asians though as we know are getting into college at greater numbers not because they are asian but because as a whole they preform better and put greater importance on education? As well as you think religion and sexual orientation are admissible because they can fall under "other factors"?
@Lady0Pamela depends on whether theyre being discriminated against for their race. ratio of qualified applicants vs accepted applicants is taken into account, not overall population. people arent accepted based on what they can afford. asians do perform better academically, but whether their acceptance rates are solely based on this would need to be studied; grades and test scores are not the only criteria schools use. i think aa applies to religion and sexual orientation too--see wikipedia.
@payasoinfeliz Well first wikipedia is written by people and thus not everything in it is accurate. Next, although SB 185 is similiar to affirmative action it is not a duplicate of affirmative action and it does not mention sexual orientation or religion as considerations but does include the words "other factors" loosely allowing a school to choose to see those as other factors or not. What happens if a qualified applicant can't afford the school?
@Lady0Pamela its got citations. if someone is accepted and they cant afford the school, then i imagine they take out a student loan and get themselves into debt like everyone else... ?
@payasoinfeliz There are scholarships for all races and genders except if you are a white male, that would be racist and sexist. For a white male to get a scholarship it would have to be because he is left handed, has a certain name, is of multiple birth, obese, tall, short, anything but his race or gender. There is a college fund sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus, could you imagine the uproar if there was one sponsored by the Congressional White Caucus?
@Lady0Pamela aa doesnt influence scholarships; those are separate things. and people are free to offer scholarships to white males--its happened before. and a lot of people dont know that you can apply for scholarships aimed at certain groups even if youre not of the target race. i dont know where to find the specific numbers/studies used to guide aa policies, but there are many studies on discrimination out there which are not necessarily used for that, but are interesting reads nonetheless.
@payasoinfeliz How do we judge if someone was discriminated upon by their race, or simply rejected by their lack of merit? Is there a site where we can see the statistics of ratio of qualified applicants vs. accepted applicants? Should over all population be somewhat of a factor? Out of all graduates if there were more whites in the class then blacks, and only some of them applied for college from both groups, wouldn't we naturally see more white kids in college then black kids?
@Lady0Pamela case by case, its going to depend on what can prove. relating to trends however, you conduct studies while controlling for variables other than sex, race, etc. to find discrepancies. dont know of a central location to find all stats, but the application of aa varies based on location. overall population is not very important; only people who apply can be rejected, so there is no need to look beyond the pool of applicants. intuitively, yes, but it depends on the situation.
@payasoinfeliz See overall population of that years graduating class should be a factor. Even if we just focus on the pool of applicants, I would love to see the statistics of those who applied vs those who were admitted seperated by race and gender to see if there is a real discrepancy. Sadly enough I have searched and can't find those facts anywhere, can you?
@payasoinfeliz Wait, first you said that Affirmative Action is here to benefit whites (!), now you are flip-flopping, trying to justify Anti-White policies because you say whites always had it better. Typical Anti-White logic.
I can promise that I've never had any "white privilege" goodies given to me; in fact we have every type of law you can think of to prevent this and we have for decades. Not only that, a huge portion of the people benefitting from these programs are IMMIGRANTS.
@4MyNation no, i said it benefits whites the most. this is not to say its "here to benefit whites," or that it is for whites. it just so happens whites benefit the most, but thats just coincidence. take the words you read at face value, and dont try to paraphrase--it will help avoid misunderstandings.
@payasoinfeliz So are you saying that the lower white race is because less white women were admitted into colleges? Are we now saying that the favored race for colleges are in fact asians and that we should ensure less of them actually get admitted into colleges?
@Lady0Pamela im saying for the bake sale to actually be analogous/comparable to affirmative action, it would have to be redressing a trend of discrimination against those groups. there is no precedent given where these discount groups were previously overcharged, so the whole concept is completely out of context.
@payasoinfeliz So again, for the bake sell to represent this properly they should hold a second bake sale to redress the over pricing? How would you say affirmative action redress' the discrimination against a group of people?
@Lady0Pamela so, redressing the first bake sale would be necessary to present a proper analogy to affirmative action. in this case, whites would need to get a discount at the second (truly analogous) sale to offset their having been overcharged previously. bucking the trend. accounting for a disparity due to bias, you offset that bias to get an outcome more representative of objective results (non biased). of course, ideally, there is no bias to remedy, but thats not the reality, unfortunately.
Those liberal, fruity, hippy, sissy, wimpy, tree hugging, queer, wiccan, jungle loving, trailer trash, occultist, leftist shrimps should BACK OFF. I grew up in the super democratic region of the San Francisco area as an Asian Indian and I STILL experienced prejudice in stores, at school, and in job hunting by the SAME liberal hypocrites that "want" affirmative action. Celebrities, democratic politicians, leftist corporations, college deans & administrators are selfish and classist bitches too.
IcedCoffee81 5 months ago
Great more racism
TheWhatupsun 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pro-whites always argue for white group survival i.e not mass immigration and "assimilation" for ALL white countries and ONLY white countries.
Anti-whites always argue for white group extinction.
GeNOcide of us whites on a global scale allegedly in the name of "Anti-racism"?
It`s a sick joke at white children`s expense: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
SickofantiwhiteBS 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
They say they are anti-racist. What they are is anti-white,and what they want is white geNOcide.
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
SickofantiwhiteBS 5 months ago
Jose Angel Gutierrez,"Civil rights leader": “We have got to eliminate the gringo, and what I mean by that is if the
worst comes to the worst, we have got to kill him.”
Kamau Kambon,Africana Studies teacher:"We need to exterminate white people off the face of the planet"
Noel Ignatiev,Harvard professor:"Keep bashing the dead white males,and the live ones,and the females too,until the social construct known as the White race is destroyed."
Susan Sontag:"Whites are the cancer of history".
SickofantiwhiteBS 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"b-but... we are all the same and equal. We all bleed red... the white team is a racist, exclusive team and besides nobody is really white."
SickofantiwhiteBS 5 months ago
Everything those anti-whites say and do is in the service of white geNOcide.
Those white geNOcide pushers are trying to say "there is no such thing as race" only for white people in white countries(while demanding anti-white discrimination!).
Where is the "freedom" in these "free countries" to publicly discuss the white demographic elimination(GENOCIDE) caused by "Diversity"?
Truth will out: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
dungeoncrawler55 5 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
All us pro-white anti-genocide advocates want is a public discussion about the attempt to turn all white countries into non-white countries,but these "tolerant" anti-whites advocate our murder in public view!
"Haters" indeed! Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.
dungeoncrawler55 5 months ago
Anti-whites like them support: Africa for the Africans,Asia for the Asians,white countries for EVERYBODY!
Maybe if Saddam Hussein had just flooded the Kurdish villages with non-Kurds,ordered the Kurds to "assimilate" with the non-Kurds to "celebrate diversity",given the non-Kurds "Affirmative action" he could have waited a few decades,wiped out the Kurds as an ethnic group,and no one would have accused him of committing genocide?
It`s so obvious: Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.
savewhitechildren 5 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Africa for Africans!
Asia for Asians!
White countries for EVERYBODY!
Save the whales!
Save the spotted owl!
TO HELL WITH WHITE CHILDREN?????
savewhitechildren 5 months ago
Nobody complains about Saudi privilege in Saudi Arabia
Nobody complains about Japanese privilege in Japan
ONLY in White countries do people complain that White people have privileges in their own country.
ONLY in White countries do Anti-Whites INSIST that we flood our countries with 3rd Worlders,and 'mix' and 'blend' our countries out of existance.ONLY Anti-Whites support this.
This attempt to Turn ALL White countries Brown is GENOCIDE
'Anti-racism' is a codeword for Anti-White
zombiekiller117 5 months ago 9
The bake sale done by the students was designed to get you talking so you can see with your OWN eyes how racist SB 185 is. Admitting students based on race/ethnicity in itself is a RACIST idea.
Unfortunately I think this idea has sailed clear over the heads of the liberals on campus. I feel sorry for the Republicans.
PanteraChick 5 months ago
Comment removed
savewhitechildren 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@PanteraChick
According to the anti-whites,anything that`s discriminatory or bad for whites is "anti-racism".
This is why so many are saying: Anti-racist is a codeword for anti-white.
savewhitechildren 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This is all about a law that allows colleges to consider race in admissions. Well let me say it is a great leap foreword for the colleges to acknowledge that race does in fact exist. I do how ever have one question.
How would the anti-White supporting this measure feel if a college took race into consideration and decided to admit more White men?
Veritatis61 5 months ago 2
@Veritatis61 I don't think more or less of any race should be admitted into colleges based solely on race, as I don't think more women or men should be allowed to go to college merely for their gender. Colleges should admit students, who did their best in schools, volunteered in their communities, and wrote a great essay on how they plan to affect the world around them.
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@Veritatis61 it is likely to help admit more white men, and this wouldnt bother proponents of the measure in general, but i imagine, whoever is actually anti-white would not like it.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@payasoinfeliz The Colburn study says all though declines and increases should be noted, it should also be noted that the tend to trend with a decrease or increase of the total population. During the decrease of white admissions, there was also a decrease in white population. During the increase in hispanic admissions in Florida there was an increase of hispanic population in Florida. Isn't it possible our colleges merely represent our populations?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
Comment removed
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
Comment removed
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
Comment removed
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
Comment removed
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
Comment removed
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
Hilarious. The Anti-Whites are caught in such a conundrum, because if they call the bake sale "racist", then that means they are calling "Affirmative Action" "racist". They don't know what to do! So damned funny! xD
Anti-Racist is a code word for Anti-White
4MyNation 5 months ago 9
@4MyNation actually, no... the bake sale is racist because it is basing the prices on race. if the discounts were given based on the groups having been previously overcharged for the same baked goods as whites, THEN the diversity bake sale pricing wouldve been based on past disparities and not race. affirmative action redresses discrimination, this bake sale is not redressing anything; theres no precedent for the discounts, its just about race.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz You're merely justifying charging white kids more than non-whites. Because you are Anti-White.
4MyNation 5 months ago
@4MyNation uh... no... it really has nothing to do with whether anyone is white. it has to do with whatever you got before. if whites had gotten overcharged, they wouldve gotten a discount--it comes down to what has been done in the past, not what color you are. in reality, today, affirmative action benefits whites the most, since women are the biggest minority group, making up over half of the us population, and about 3 fourths of them are white... lol
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz Oh okay, so you are in favor of Affirmative Action since it helps whites more than anyone else.
Is anybody else catching this horseshit?
4MyNation 5 months ago
@4MyNation no, im in favor of affirmative action because it combats racism. whether whites benefit has no bearing on whether im in favor of it at all. as it happens, they are the primary beneficiaries, but this is no a problem or a boon.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz I call outright bullshit. What you are is a liar who will lie to support Affirmative Action.
4MyNation 5 months ago
@4MyNation thats nice. feel free to explain where i lied.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz If anyone else believes that Affirmative Action is here for the BENEFIT OF WHITES, I've got some land in Arizona I'd like to sell you. You're just trying to justify Anti-White policies.
4MyNation 5 months ago
@4MyNation you think your doubt or ignorance on a subject means you know something? it doesnt. women are a protected minority group: fact. the overwhelming majority of women in the usa are white: fact. its not hard to understand. when affirmative action was done away with in california, do you know what happened? asians were admitted to college at higher rates; whites were not--in fact, whites were admitted to college at lower rates after they stopped affirmative action. its not rocket science.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz That's right because Affirmative Action was based on RACE QUOTAS. What part of that don't you understand?
4MyNation 5 months ago
@4MyNation thats like some kid saying his mom had a gender quota, because she gave his sister an extra 10 bucks allowance, after having given him 10 more than her the previous week. "you only gave her more this week because shes a girl, mom! that is sexist! you hate boys and so gave me less!" mom: "no, son... she got more this time because you got 10 more than her last week... i wouldve done the same for you, a boy, if you were shortchanged. its not about your penis..."
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz As in your example you are talking about redressing for the actual victim, affirmative action is like saying because your 16th great grand dad only received $1 dollar allowance and my 16th great grand dad received $5 dollars allowance that you should receive $4 dollars until you have received what your 16th great grand dad was shorted.
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@Lady0Pamela affirmative action (aa) redresses current trends; its not like reparations where people are compensated for inequities of generations past. aa mostly applies to sex and race, but i think religion and sexual orientation are admissible; i suppose any trait tied to demonstrable trends of discrimination could be factored in. im saying white admissions decreased post-aa. asians... that would depend on whether theyre being admitted in higher numbers because theyre asian.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz So blacks & hispanics are admitted into schools less because they are black & hispanic not because of grades, test scores, population ratio or ability to afford college? Asians though as we know are getting into college at greater numbers not because they are asian but because as a whole they preform better and put greater importance on education? As well as you think religion and sexual orientation are admissible because they can fall under "other factors"?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@Lady0Pamela depends on whether theyre being discriminated against for their race. ratio of qualified applicants vs accepted applicants is taken into account, not overall population. people arent accepted based on what they can afford. asians do perform better academically, but whether their acceptance rates are solely based on this would need to be studied; grades and test scores are not the only criteria schools use. i think aa applies to religion and sexual orientation too--see wikipedia.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz Well first wikipedia is written by people and thus not everything in it is accurate. Next, although SB 185 is similiar to affirmative action it is not a duplicate of affirmative action and it does not mention sexual orientation or religion as considerations but does include the words "other factors" loosely allowing a school to choose to see those as other factors or not. What happens if a qualified applicant can't afford the school?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@Lady0Pamela its got citations. if someone is accepted and they cant afford the school, then i imagine they take out a student loan and get themselves into debt like everyone else... ?
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz There are scholarships for all races and genders except if you are a white male, that would be racist and sexist. For a white male to get a scholarship it would have to be because he is left handed, has a certain name, is of multiple birth, obese, tall, short, anything but his race or gender. There is a college fund sponsored by the Congressional Black Caucus, could you imagine the uproar if there was one sponsored by the Congressional White Caucus?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@Lady0Pamela aa doesnt influence scholarships; those are separate things. and people are free to offer scholarships to white males--its happened before. and a lot of people dont know that you can apply for scholarships aimed at certain groups even if youre not of the target race. i dont know where to find the specific numbers/studies used to guide aa policies, but there are many studies on discrimination out there which are not necessarily used for that, but are interesting reads nonetheless.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz How do we judge if someone was discriminated upon by their race, or simply rejected by their lack of merit? Is there a site where we can see the statistics of ratio of qualified applicants vs. accepted applicants? Should over all population be somewhat of a factor? Out of all graduates if there were more whites in the class then blacks, and only some of them applied for college from both groups, wouldn't we naturally see more white kids in college then black kids?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@Lady0Pamela case by case, its going to depend on what can prove. relating to trends however, you conduct studies while controlling for variables other than sex, race, etc. to find discrepancies. dont know of a central location to find all stats, but the application of aa varies based on location. overall population is not very important; only people who apply can be rejected, so there is no need to look beyond the pool of applicants. intuitively, yes, but it depends on the situation.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz See overall population of that years graduating class should be a factor. Even if we just focus on the pool of applicants, I would love to see the statistics of those who applied vs those who were admitted seperated by race and gender to see if there is a real discrepancy. Sadly enough I have searched and can't find those facts anywhere, can you?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
Comment removed
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@payasoinfeliz So if we found that wiccans and satanist were under-represented in schools should we look at that for diversity in schools of course?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz Wait, first you said that Affirmative Action is here to benefit whites (!), now you are flip-flopping, trying to justify Anti-White policies because you say whites always had it better. Typical Anti-White logic.
I can promise that I've never had any "white privilege" goodies given to me; in fact we have every type of law you can think of to prevent this and we have for decades. Not only that, a huge portion of the people benefitting from these programs are IMMIGRANTS.
4MyNation 5 months ago
@4MyNation no, i said it benefits whites the most. this is not to say its "here to benefit whites," or that it is for whites. it just so happens whites benefit the most, but thats just coincidence. take the words you read at face value, and dont try to paraphrase--it will help avoid misunderstandings.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz So are you saying that the lower white race is because less white women were admitted into colleges? Are we now saying that the favored race for colleges are in fact asians and that we should ensure less of them actually get admitted into colleges?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz So are you saying for the bake sale to be more relevant they should hold another one next week with the prices going the opposite way?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@Lady0Pamela im saying for the bake sale to actually be analogous/comparable to affirmative action, it would have to be redressing a trend of discrimination against those groups. there is no precedent given where these discount groups were previously overcharged, so the whole concept is completely out of context.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz So again, for the bake sell to represent this properly they should hold a second bake sale to redress the over pricing? How would you say affirmative action redress' the discrimination against a group of people?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
@Lady0Pamela so, redressing the first bake sale would be necessary to present a proper analogy to affirmative action. in this case, whites would need to get a discount at the second (truly analogous) sale to offset their having been overcharged previously. bucking the trend. accounting for a disparity due to bias, you offset that bias to get an outcome more representative of objective results (non biased). of course, ideally, there is no bias to remedy, but thats not the reality, unfortunately.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz So how does affirmative action redress the discrimination of a group of people?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Lady0Pamela by offsetting the trends of discrimination.
payasoinfeliz 5 months ago
@payasoinfeliz Which trends of discrimination do you believe qualify and how do you choose them?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@payasoinfeliz So are you saying for the bake sale to be more relevant they should hold another one next week with the prices going the opposite way?
Lady0Pamela 5 months ago