that's what so great about music , different people react in different ways to how things are played . I am old enough to have bought the original as an import in the early 60's , and fell in love with this song. However on the other hand I hate the live versions he has sung for the last 10 years . He has ruined a beautiful song it is now a total mess
I guess I just can't get enough of this wonderful music. Cathy weaves her vocals with such clever and subtle rhythmic patterns and lilting feminine dynamics that one becomes easily mezmerized, and caught up in the beconning quality of her voice. Like I've heard said, "She could sing a dictionary and draw you in".
Nanci's Griffith version is great but Cathy's Jordan's is the best cover - except for deaf and blind people - !!
maximus73f 9 months ago
The horrible Hollywood strings, the horrible Hollywood makeover, and the horrible lower register!
Boylefawsitt 9 months ago
I was fortunate enough to hear this live....I cried. Her voice is beyond amazing. I think I love you.
71moriah 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I was fortunate enough to hear this live....I cried. Her voice is beyond amazing. I think I love you.
71moriah 10 months ago
Comment removed
71moriah 10 months ago
Love this version *w*
wolveslullaby 1 year ago
She's awesome and really nice :) Knowing her was a really pleasure ^^
wolveslullaby 1 year ago
This must be the worst cover of a Bob Dylan song.
PatrickWhite85 1 year ago
Cathy is so beautiful I can't hardly watch because my heart breaks.
TheMrGoodin 2 years ago 6
Dylan does it so well, especially his Carnegie Hall version, but she makes it seem as though it's a woman's song to sing.
rvcrvc2 2 years ago 4
They're getting a bit polished these days aren't they? Still a great band though.
whigwood 3 years ago
That's a voice you can fall in love with!
bkedp 3 years ago 2
elegant....makes me wanna cry.such control over her voice. gently too.
kimaxh 3 years ago 3
great version! great voice!
74carlos46 3 years ago 8
This verison is good, but it is not as good as the other Dervish version under this same channel. The other one is mind bendingly beautiful!
I am a huge Bob Zombie but I think I like Cathy & Dervish's rendition better!
bornintime22 3 years ago
this is the only other version of this that is equal to Bob Dylan's...VERY VERY beautiful!
parhal 3 years ago
you have obviously not heard Nanci Griffiths version on the transatlantic sessions . Knocks this into a cocked hat
hankham666 3 years ago
actually I have and just didn't have the same reaction to her version that you did it seems.
parhal 3 years ago 2
that's what so great about music , different people react in different ways to how things are played . I am old enough to have bought the original as an import in the early 60's , and fell in love with this song. However on the other hand I hate the live versions he has sung for the last 10 years . He has ruined a beautiful song it is now a total mess
hankham666 3 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
her version is boring and her accent sucks 10 dicks
wiibasslife 3 years ago
@hankham666 Have to agree with you on this one. NG's version is excellent
wbrentyoung 1 year ago
I guess I just can't get enough of this wonderful music. Cathy weaves her vocals with such clever and subtle rhythmic patterns and lilting feminine dynamics that one becomes easily mezmerized, and caught up in the beconning quality of her voice. Like I've heard said, "She could sing a dictionary and draw you in".
erth2myk2b 3 years ago 3
I really like this version...I prefer Bob of course but the lead singers voice of Dervish is so unique
booper5252 3 years ago
I don'tknow. It's an argument between lovers, not a lament. slhould be faster and the progression is off.
mcob1 3 years ago
Wonderfull performance! Thanks so much for uploading, your channel is brilliant!
xXevelOnXx 4 years ago 3