Sustaining a Story: Part 1

[Peetar]

Didn't you guys say to never cut from a moving shot to a static shot in another video? That push in to the phone and then cut to a static shot kind of mixed me up.

[esotericsean]

@Peetar Never cut from a moving to a static, unless the intention is to purposely cause a break in the flow of continuity. Not sure if that was intentional or not in this case, though :P

[esotericsean]

@Peetar Never cut from a moving to a static, unless the intention is to purposely cause a break in the flow of continuity. Not sure if that was intentional or not in this case, though :P

[FoolsGoldFish]

Great film, the quality looks great, what do you shoot on? The editing was very well done as well, all in all, good job! Going to part two now...

[esotericsean]

Thanks! We shoot with a Sony PMW-EX1 :)

[toastymedia]

good job guys! 5/5!

[midprod]

are you guys really gay?...

[esotericsean]

lol

[NEWSTREAMSTUDIOS]

this is really good imformation wise and shot wise

this is really good imformation wise and shot wise or cancel

[wcbadboy21]

Favorited.

[aprilLIKES10yearolds]

a bandpass filter would have been more convincing as a phone conversation, though the cinematography was really good. i like this style!

[esotericsean]

Did you watch part 2, yet? I think it's better than this one :)

[pilamin]

That was more of a creative decision on my part. I wanted to keep the dialog more discernible than plausible. If it sounded too hollow and raspy, the "presence" (midranges) went out the window.

And besides, iPhones don't sound all that bad; especially with headphones.

[aprilLIKES10yearolds]

new take zer0 YES!