To BrianRinner: When exposing falsehoods & deceptions in the science textbooks, how else would you present your topic? Evolutionists are biased against the idea that God created everything or, for that matter, that there even is a God. Creationists are biased against untruthful data presented. How can a person be neutral on this subject? Either something is truthful or it is not. If what Dr. Jackson states is untruthful, then enlighten us with what is true. He is only stating what he has found.
To beanberry: There are tens of thousands of peer-reviewed articles that do not pick at evolution but give very good evidences for a young earth, a world-wide flood, and the sudden appearance of all phyla of life at once! The evidence is there, very clear, and creation rather than major evolution should be inferred. Creationists do not say that change does not occur. Living organisms do change to adapt to their environment. But the amoeba to man theory is not supported by genetic evidence.
As for peer reviewed journals concerning Creation Science, The Creation Research Quarterly is just such a journal. But you evolutionists will never read it so you don't know it exists. See the video I placed on Youtube called Darwin's Junkyard Tornado. It quotes Sir Fred Hoyle, an avid evolutionist, from Nature Magazine, Vol 294, No. 5837, Nov 12, 1981, p 148 Nature is a peer-reviewed journal. Science Magazine and Scientific American refuse any articles referring to Creation Science.
You evolutionists that reply with off-the wall comments that throw darts at a dartboard never aiming at the bullseye are just wasting everyone's time. You like to assassinate the character of the spokesman, acting as if you are any better than they are, but you never, ever, make a statement that the person is lying. You know that what he says is true because it is in the textbooks. Because you cannot disprove this, you resort to name-calling.
And an other thing all creationists do if pick shit but offer nothing, no peer reviewed paper, no theory supported by facts to prove their claims, its all a scam.
Charles Jackson has a Bachelor's Degree in Biology, a Master's in Science Education, and a master's in Environmental Biology from George Mason University. He has a Doctorate in Science Education at the University of Virginia. One does not have to work in the field of science to be a scientist. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, a scientist is a person having expert knowledge of one or more sciences, especially a natural or physical science. He speaks the truth. Address that issue!
Golly .. his EdD (education) is what qualifies him to be called "Doctor" but it is a doctorate in EDUCATION. He is an ex-school teacher who went into religious ministry. Those are his ONLY two professions. He has never wrked as a scientist nor been employed in academia as a scientist, therefore he is not a scientist. Definition enough for you, dipshit?? So would you kindly go and fuck your satan, fuck your fake scientist, and fuck your god? Thank you xx
What is your definition of scientist? He has a doctorate in science. What do you have? Just because you don't like what he says does not alter the fact that what he says is true! A high school drop-out can still speak the truth, can't he? The people that listened to this lecture didn't pay a dime. It was free, just as all of our Creation Evidence Expo events are free! The god of this world (Satan) has blinded your heart to the truth. God created us whether you like the idea or not.
This guy is not a scientist, you all know that right?, he's just an ex-school teacher with his own opinions. The worst thing is, he's a really bad performer and those people deserve their money back.
@BelieveandtrustJesus You are brainwashed by religion. Every religion has a different creation story. I never said there is no God, I said science proved the bible wrong, Galileo did it hundreds of years ago.
@gregrutz Could you pleas tell me what verses in the Bible were proven wrong by Galileo? A general statement that science has proven the Bible wrong is a rather grandiose statement, isn't it? I want specific scientific evidence that has proven the Bible to be wrong. And it better be actual evidence and not just a bunch of theoretical conjectures.
@gregrutz As far as God and man is concerned, the Earth is the center of His attention. Referring to Hubble's Law that indicates the universe is expanding at an ever-increasing rate, found scientifically by measuring the doppler effect of stars moving away from us causing a red-shift, tell me why ALL of the stars, observed from every place on earth show a red shift, indicating they are moving away from the earth. If we are not the center, shouldn't we have measured some stars coming toward us?
@gregrutz The world-wide layers of the same sedimentary rock from which we get fossils show a quick deposition of life forms caused by one or more floods. Fossils don't have time to take millions of years to form. They would be destroyed quickly by decay. You need to research more on how fossils are deposited. As for a world-wide flood, there are stories from 52 different early people around the world that indicate this. Continental drift from one land mass indicates a world-wide flood also.
@gregrutz You need to thoroughly study the Mt. St. Helen's eruption and how it proved that within 7 days canyons just like the Grand Canyon with the many sedimentary layers could be formed by a flood. The latest theories about the Grand Canyon was changed by Mt. St. Helens. Their own park resources now tell that a giant flood formed it. The Colorado River came afterwards. As for the circle of the earth, it can be also translated "globe". Note that in 600 BC, Isaiah said the Earth was round.
@gregrutz As for working on the Sabbath Day, you could be killed. You could also be killed by being a homosexual or practicing beastiality, or even commiting adultery. Any sin will eventually kill you and exclude you from heaven.. Romans 6:23 states: The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus our Lord. All of us are sinners that leads to the death of us all. (Romans 3.23). If you accept Jesus as your Savior, though you will die, yet shall you live eternally.
@gregrutz I also addressed the issue that there was a flood that covered the whole earth. I have a doctorate of science and have been studying this issue for 40 years now. You appear to be an armchair scientist who just listens to what other evolutionists have to say and agree with them because you are basically against God. If you studied the layers of deposits that not only cover the entire earth at sea level, but also the mountain tops, you would find that these evidence a giant flood.
@gregrutz Concerning your saying the Bible was wrong about the earth being the center of everything. You never quoted a verse where it said the earth is the center of everything. Don't mix up what the Bible says and what the Catholic Church said. Many times they contradict each other. The Catholic church's official ruling states that when the Bible and Catholic doctrines conflict, you are to accept the Cahtolic doctrine, which may be totally false and against the Bible. Mormons think the same.
@gregrutz Gallileo lived in the latter 1500's and early 1600's. The Bible used by Cahtolics at that time was the Latin Vulgate, written by Jerome around 430. The other versions of the Bible by Tyndale in 1535 and the King James Version in 1611 were not accepted by the Catholic Church at that time. So, using any of the above Bibles, I ask you once again, what verses indicate that the Earth is the center of everything? Incidentally, the Catholic Church, itself, did not write any bible.
@debmarkproductions the bible never says that the Earth is the center of the universe. i agree here. idk where they would get that idea of it saying that
I love how he goes from the textbook to Newsweek - yes, Newsweek, that paragon of scientific journals...why not quote directly from the paper of the scientist quoted...? I can imagine why...
@amaxamon It sounds like you disagree with his presentation rather than the material itself. The textbook seems to contradict itself and his material warrants a fair hearing.
The atheist and evolutionist can't find God for the same reason that a thief can't find a police officer. Think about it. :) I would love to see Dr. Jackson go up against Mr. Dawkins..Dr.Jackson would destroy him. Here´s another quote that I mined :)
Truth is so obscure in these times, and falsehood so established, that, unless we love the truth, we cannot know it.
@stealthfighter94 Dr. Jackson would not be able to go against Dr. Dawkins. Dawkins has evidence and, unlike Jackson, does have an open mindedness, but skepticism, to claims of science. The creationist theory is not the same as the evolution theory. The evolution theory is scientific and has been tested repeatedly. The creationist theory is all about showing either outdated or misinformed data about evolution to "prove" its point as Jackson does.
To sweatytoothmadman: If you really want a lot of good science and not just "quote mining", purchase this DVD and/or his other DVD to see his entire presentation. You have to realize that what was presented here is a very small part of his lecture. Attend a Creation Evidence Expo and you will get an enormous amount of good science refuting evolutionary claims.
@gregrutz I looked at your youtube videos. You are obviously an evolutionist. If the Bible is nothing more than fairy-tales to you, then you can believe whatever you wish - it may have taken millions of years for life to evolve into its diverse species. But if the Bible is true, then millions of years of evolution must be false. I don't see anyone fighting as hard to prove there is no Easter Bunny as those who try to prove there is no God. Come to a Creation Evidence Expo and see the evidence.
@debmarkproductions Evolution proves the bible wrong. Geology proves the Bible wrong, no flood. Astronomy proves the bible wrong, the universe is old.
Science keeps discovering things that prove the Bible is wrong. It says nothing about God.
@gregrutz The Bible, which more than 2 billion people accept as truth, you say that science proves to be wrong or false. I don't know how long you have been a scientist and I don't know how much you researched the science behind the Bible, but please tell me how life came about. Give me science where they have actually created life in the laboratory. Tell me the real mechanism of how life arose and if it is a true mechanism, why can't scientists use that process to create life now?
@debmarkproductions Tell me the real mechanism for getting all the animals of the earth on a boat.
If God made the first cell then you would 'believe' in evolution?
Scientists don't have to recreate the earth's history to know what happened in the past. Life evolved WITH the earth over 4 billion years, you can't do that in a lab.
@gregrutz First, only the land-dwelling animals were in the ark. We know from genetics that all of the canines came from one progenitor, probably the wolf. All canines will breed with each other, therefore are of the same kind. The same with the cat family. These first kinds had all of the dominant, recessive, and allele genes necessary for their offspring to adapt to their environment and change characteristics, staying in their kind. It was easy to fit all the progenitors on the ark.
@gregrutz The Cambrian explosion, just discovered within the last few years shows every modern life form appearing all at once in the Cambrian layer, which was supposed to contain only simple water-dwelling life forms. The only thing fround in pre-cambrian rock were possibly worms, if even that. If everything appeared all at once, which happens to be necessary because of the requirement of symbiosis, the only explanation is the quick creative act of God.
DNA proves we did NOT evolve from Neanderthals either. That means there were two kinds of humans walking the earth at the same time ! How does that fit into the Bible story?
@gregrutz We never stated that we evolved from Neanderthals. Neanderthals are with us even today, I know one myself -- they should never have been put into a separate species than homo sapiens. Recent findings indicate that they not only lived together but also bred together. Their bones were found in the same cave. And according to genetics, if two can breed together they are of the same kind or species. We cannot breed with apes or any other primate. Ergo, we are not the same kind.
This man is doing nothing but quote mining, from individuals and random non peer review news papers. Let see a creationists actually attack the science directly.
i find it funny how atheists and evolutionists attack other creationist videos fiercely, but have left this video alone. i guess they're not comfortable arguing or cursing at their own flaws. :)
What country have these fucking idiots? u should relly do something about them....
evanlion64 4 weeks ago
To BrianRinner: When exposing falsehoods & deceptions in the science textbooks, how else would you present your topic? Evolutionists are biased against the idea that God created everything or, for that matter, that there even is a God. Creationists are biased against untruthful data presented. How can a person be neutral on this subject? Either something is truthful or it is not. If what Dr. Jackson states is untruthful, then enlighten us with what is true. He is only stating what he has found.
debmarkproductions 1 month ago
To beanberry: There are tens of thousands of peer-reviewed articles that do not pick at evolution but give very good evidences for a young earth, a world-wide flood, and the sudden appearance of all phyla of life at once! The evidence is there, very clear, and creation rather than major evolution should be inferred. Creationists do not say that change does not occur. Living organisms do change to adapt to their environment. But the amoeba to man theory is not supported by genetic evidence.
debmarkproductions 1 month ago
@debmarkproductions Why is the speaker presenting with an obviously biased attitude?
BrianRinner 1 month ago
As for peer reviewed journals concerning Creation Science, The Creation Research Quarterly is just such a journal. But you evolutionists will never read it so you don't know it exists. See the video I placed on Youtube called Darwin's Junkyard Tornado. It quotes Sir Fred Hoyle, an avid evolutionist, from Nature Magazine, Vol 294, No. 5837, Nov 12, 1981, p 148 Nature is a peer-reviewed journal. Science Magazine and Scientific American refuse any articles referring to Creation Science.
debmarkproductions 1 month ago
You evolutionists that reply with off-the wall comments that throw darts at a dartboard never aiming at the bullseye are just wasting everyone's time. You like to assassinate the character of the spokesman, acting as if you are any better than they are, but you never, ever, make a statement that the person is lying. You know that what he says is true because it is in the textbooks. Because you cannot disprove this, you resort to name-calling.
debmarkproductions 1 month ago
And an other thing all creationists do if pick shit but offer nothing, no peer reviewed paper, no theory supported by facts to prove their claims, its all a scam.
benaberry 1 month ago
Charles Jackson has a Bachelor's Degree in Biology, a Master's in Science Education, and a master's in Environmental Biology from George Mason University. He has a Doctorate in Science Education at the University of Virginia. One does not have to work in the field of science to be a scientist. According to the American Heritage Dictionary, a scientist is a person having expert knowledge of one or more sciences, especially a natural or physical science. He speaks the truth. Address that issue!
debmarkproductions 2 months ago
Why is he talking about the big bang and evolution together, they are not the same thing and this guy was an educator. Wow.......fail.
benaberry 1 month ago
See at 1:53 how he pauses to allow the audience to finish his sentence with the word "monkeys"? That is NOT a scientist .. that's just Mr Garrison :)
lizoir 2 months ago
Golly .. his EdD (education) is what qualifies him to be called "Doctor" but it is a doctorate in EDUCATION. He is an ex-school teacher who went into religious ministry. Those are his ONLY two professions. He has never wrked as a scientist nor been employed in academia as a scientist, therefore he is not a scientist. Definition enough for you, dipshit?? So would you kindly go and fuck your satan, fuck your fake scientist, and fuck your god? Thank you xx
lizoir 2 months ago
What is your definition of scientist? He has a doctorate in science. What do you have? Just because you don't like what he says does not alter the fact that what he says is true! A high school drop-out can still speak the truth, can't he? The people that listened to this lecture didn't pay a dime. It was free, just as all of our Creation Evidence Expo events are free! The god of this world (Satan) has blinded your heart to the truth. God created us whether you like the idea or not.
debmarkproductions 2 months ago
This guy is not a scientist, you all know that right?, he's just an ex-school teacher with his own opinions. The worst thing is, he's a really bad performer and those people deserve their money back.
lizoir 2 months ago
@BelieveandtrustJesus
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
Thank You for showing evolution in action.
No, the Big Bang is not Evolution.
I didn't see where he explained the fossils that were ''not Human''
gregrutz 6 months ago
@BelieveandtrustJesus You are brainwashed by religion. Every religion has a different creation story. I never said there is no God, I said science proved the bible wrong, Galileo did it hundreds of years ago.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz Could you pleas tell me what verses in the Bible were proven wrong by Galileo? A general statement that science has proven the Bible wrong is a rather grandiose statement, isn't it? I want specific scientific evidence that has proven the Bible to be wrong. And it better be actual evidence and not just a bunch of theoretical conjectures.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
@debmarkproductions The bible says the earth is the center of everything, Galileo proved it wrong.
Does the bible say there was a flood. Then it is wrong, there is no evidence for a flood.
.
Isaiah 40 : 22-24
“He sits enthroned above the circle of the earth, and its people are like grasshoppers.”
I can draw a circle on a flat piece of paper, they are 2D. FLAT.
.
- If you work on a Sabbath, you should be killed [Exodus 31:15] Nice...
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz As far as God and man is concerned, the Earth is the center of His attention. Referring to Hubble's Law that indicates the universe is expanding at an ever-increasing rate, found scientifically by measuring the doppler effect of stars moving away from us causing a red-shift, tell me why ALL of the stars, observed from every place on earth show a red shift, indicating they are moving away from the earth. If we are not the center, shouldn't we have measured some stars coming toward us?
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
@gregrutz The world-wide layers of the same sedimentary rock from which we get fossils show a quick deposition of life forms caused by one or more floods. Fossils don't have time to take millions of years to form. They would be destroyed quickly by decay. You need to research more on how fossils are deposited. As for a world-wide flood, there are stories from 52 different early people around the world that indicate this. Continental drift from one land mass indicates a world-wide flood also.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
@gregrutz You need to thoroughly study the Mt. St. Helen's eruption and how it proved that within 7 days canyons just like the Grand Canyon with the many sedimentary layers could be formed by a flood. The latest theories about the Grand Canyon was changed by Mt. St. Helens. Their own park resources now tell that a giant flood formed it. The Colorado River came afterwards. As for the circle of the earth, it can be also translated "globe". Note that in 600 BC, Isaiah said the Earth was round.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
@gregrutz As for working on the Sabbath Day, you could be killed. You could also be killed by being a homosexual or practicing beastiality, or even commiting adultery. Any sin will eventually kill you and exclude you from heaven.. Romans 6:23 states: The wages of sin is death, but the gift of God is eternal life through Jesus our Lord. All of us are sinners that leads to the death of us all. (Romans 3.23). If you accept Jesus as your Savior, though you will die, yet shall you live eternally.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
@debmarkproductions You forgot the part where the bible is WRONG.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz I also addressed the issue that there was a flood that covered the whole earth. I have a doctorate of science and have been studying this issue for 40 years now. You appear to be an armchair scientist who just listens to what other evolutionists have to say and agree with them because you are basically against God. If you studied the layers of deposits that not only cover the entire earth at sea level, but also the mountain tops, you would find that these evidence a giant flood.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
@debmarkproductions What evidence for a flood? Are you a Geologist?
Floods don't make distinct layers.
Floods don't make different kinds of rock.
Floods don't sort fossils.
Not all sediments are from a flood. Like slow growing corals, ash layers, chalk, limestone, etc.
Floods don't just go away, where did 29,029 feet fo water go?
Geology has nothing to do with God.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz Concerning your saying the Bible was wrong about the earth being the center of everything. You never quoted a verse where it said the earth is the center of everything. Don't mix up what the Bible says and what the Catholic Church said. Many times they contradict each other. The Catholic church's official ruling states that when the Bible and Catholic doctrines conflict, you are to accept the Cahtolic doctrine, which may be totally false and against the Bible. Mormons think the same.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
@debmarkproductions The Catholic Church wrote the bible dummy. Your religion broke away from them.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz Gallileo lived in the latter 1500's and early 1600's. The Bible used by Cahtolics at that time was the Latin Vulgate, written by Jerome around 430. The other versions of the Bible by Tyndale in 1535 and the King James Version in 1611 were not accepted by the Catholic Church at that time. So, using any of the above Bibles, I ask you once again, what verses indicate that the Earth is the center of everything? Incidentally, the Catholic Church, itself, did not write any bible.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
@debmarkproductions the bible never says that the Earth is the center of the universe. i agree here. idk where they would get that idea of it saying that
billynunns 5 months ago
The Washington Post is his scientific referance?!? LOL
gregrutz 10 months ago
Creation Evidence ?!? It must have been are very short Expo !
gregrutz 10 months ago
I love how he goes from the textbook to Newsweek - yes, Newsweek, that paragon of scientific journals...why not quote directly from the paper of the scientist quoted...? I can imagine why...
amaxamon 2 years ago
@amaxamon It sounds like you disagree with his presentation rather than the material itself. The textbook seems to contradict itself and his material warrants a fair hearing.
greatiam1 2 years ago
The atheist and evolutionist can't find God for the same reason that a thief can't find a police officer. Think about it. :) I would love to see Dr. Jackson go up against Mr. Dawkins..Dr.Jackson would destroy him. Here´s another quote that I mined :)
Truth is so obscure in these times, and falsehood so established, that, unless we love the truth, we cannot know it.
stealthfighter94 2 years ago
@stealthfighter94 Dr. Jackson would not be able to go against Dr. Dawkins. Dawkins has evidence and, unlike Jackson, does have an open mindedness, but skepticism, to claims of science. The creationist theory is not the same as the evolution theory. The evolution theory is scientific and has been tested repeatedly. The creationist theory is all about showing either outdated or misinformed data about evolution to "prove" its point as Jackson does.
Kamikaze34 1 year ago
To sweatytoothmadman: If you really want a lot of good science and not just "quote mining", purchase this DVD and/or his other DVD to see his entire presentation. You have to realize that what was presented here is a very small part of his lecture. Attend a Creation Evidence Expo and you will get an enormous amount of good science refuting evolutionary claims.
debmarkproductions 2 years ago
I've actually had a discussion with him and he isn't much better in a back and forth debate.
sweatytoothmadman 2 years ago
@sweatytoothmadman He never explains where the fossils came from. Did Noah take Lucy on the Ark?
gregrutz 10 months ago
@debmarkproductions ''enormous amount of good science refuting evolutionary claims.''
How is that evidence for creationism?
gregrutz 10 months ago
@gregrutz I looked at your youtube videos. You are obviously an evolutionist. If the Bible is nothing more than fairy-tales to you, then you can believe whatever you wish - it may have taken millions of years for life to evolve into its diverse species. But if the Bible is true, then millions of years of evolution must be false. I don't see anyone fighting as hard to prove there is no Easter Bunny as those who try to prove there is no God. Come to a Creation Evidence Expo and see the evidence.
debmarkproductions 10 months ago
@debmarkproductions Evolution proves the bible wrong. Geology proves the Bible wrong, no flood. Astronomy proves the bible wrong, the universe is old.
Science keeps discovering things that prove the Bible is wrong. It says nothing about God.
gregrutz 10 months ago
@gregrutz The Bible, which more than 2 billion people accept as truth, you say that science proves to be wrong or false. I don't know how long you have been a scientist and I don't know how much you researched the science behind the Bible, but please tell me how life came about. Give me science where they have actually created life in the laboratory. Tell me the real mechanism of how life arose and if it is a true mechanism, why can't scientists use that process to create life now?
debmarkproductions 10 months ago
@debmarkproductions ''the science behind the Bible'' Science does not use the supernatural.
Abiogenesis is how life started.
Tell me where all the water went from the flood. What is the name of the flood mud layer with all the bodies in it. Why didn't the Chinese all die?
gregrutz 10 months ago
@debmarkproductions Tell me the real mechanism for getting all the animals of the earth on a boat.
If God made the first cell then you would 'believe' in evolution?
Scientists don't have to recreate the earth's history to know what happened in the past. Life evolved WITH the earth over 4 billion years, you can't do that in a lab.
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz First, only the land-dwelling animals were in the ark. We know from genetics that all of the canines came from one progenitor, probably the wolf. All canines will breed with each other, therefore are of the same kind. The same with the cat family. These first kinds had all of the dominant, recessive, and allele genes necessary for their offspring to adapt to their environment and change characteristics, staying in their kind. It was easy to fit all the progenitors on the ark.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
@gregrutz The Cambrian explosion, just discovered within the last few years shows every modern life form appearing all at once in the Cambrian layer, which was supposed to contain only simple water-dwelling life forms. The only thing fround in pre-cambrian rock were possibly worms, if even that. If everything appeared all at once, which happens to be necessary because of the requirement of symbiosis, the only explanation is the quick creative act of God.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
DNA proves we did NOT evolve from Neanderthals either. That means there were two kinds of humans walking the earth at the same time ! How does that fit into the Bible story?
gregrutz 6 months ago
@gregrutz We never stated that we evolved from Neanderthals. Neanderthals are with us even today, I know one myself -- they should never have been put into a separate species than homo sapiens. Recent findings indicate that they not only lived together but also bred together. Their bones were found in the same cave. And according to genetics, if two can breed together they are of the same kind or species. We cannot breed with apes or any other primate. Ergo, we are not the same kind.
debmarkproductions 6 months ago
This man is doing nothing but quote mining, from individuals and random non peer review news papers. Let see a creationists actually attack the science directly.
sweatytoothmadman 2 years ago
i find it funny how atheists and evolutionists attack other creationist videos fiercely, but have left this video alone. i guess they're not comfortable arguing or cursing at their own flaws. :)
StarSedition 2 years ago
Maybe it's due to the fact that it only has 198 views... Not many have seen it.
sweatytoothmadman 2 years ago
Dr. Jackson Goes to my Church He is A Great Guy.
TenderLovinTeague 2 years ago
Pretty good sound quality - almost everything he says is clear. Decent movie quality too - just the words on the projector are hard to read.
rockdeworld 3 years ago