Added: 3 years ago
From: clackdwack
Views: 56,120
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (78)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • its supposed to run on water! thats what Paul invented

  • Someone in the know, told me that Molly told him that Paul murdered the guy that originally designed this system. Paul knew it didn't work but saw the potential to con people with it and that he has done! So much so that in Utah, they had him put in the nut house. A carburetor or fuel injection does a much better job than this system and they actually work where the Geet system does not.

  • @Progneto Murder? My oh my, You never cease do you. But I suppose such clandestine suppression acts are to be expected especially in your lair

    ATTENTION VIEWERS: Here we have a classic case of disinformation propagated by the NWO as damage control given GEET's widespread success & commercial applications ALREADY on the market with youtube videos to substantiate those claims.

  • @Begbucks I didn't say Paul murdered the guy, another person told me that Molly had told him Paul did it. If you want to be delusional and think that GEET is a raving success, so be it. I will say this, if you can drive a GEET powered pickup or car and get twice the mileage and twice the power (on a dyno) and drive it over 500 miles in one day, I'll pay you $1,000.00 cash. Believe me, I wish it really did work, I would have one on my vehicles.I watched some very smart men try to make it work.

  • @Progneto Naturally, hearsay is not admissible as evidence so why paint a facade of disdain? I find that the merits of GEET are beyond mileage but mainly the interchangeability of fuels with far lower emissions which themselves are a fuel. The Vapor carb can offer a quintuple advantage on gasoline as formulated in the 30's however counter productive additives negate these higher values. Then there is fuel injection which by design complicates conversion unlike their non-electronic brethren...

  • @Begbucks You can have the last word. I realize that people are going to continue to be suckered into this con as long as Pantone is breathing. I watched several very intelligent men give their lives to this but they were unable to get a car to drive on it. They could get one started but couldn't drive it and Pantone was there, hands on. To hear Pantone talk, all of your neighbors are running the GEET system and getting twice the mileage and twice the power. Show me the proof!

  • @Progneto Such kind sentiment indeed extends insight into your allegiance, but since you are a reluctant sort of chap when the ideal conversion subject manifests as modern cars are tremendously over-engineered to counter any benefits of a conversion so certainly there will be some bugs to be worked out. I would mainly focus on small engines for now. These are an inexpensive platform to start with....

  • @Progneto ...3.) Con't... Then step up to car & truck engines at which point I feel; you'll eagerly require the 1k to hightail to some crepuscular dungeon on Devil's Island.

    At ease; a little patience please...

  • @Progneto The only advantage to a conventional fluid gas carburetor over the vapor carb is more Shekels in Zurich.

  • why bother if u receive no millage gains..''This means it does not work...Plain and simple

    

  • @bearboneskentuck Merely a design complication on that type of car, you know; a decimal point shoved or negated under the circumspect eye of the instructor, a random urge to satisfy; is why there there are no mpg gains on this car, HOWEVER you are missing the point in that here a gasoline propelled vehicle can be converted to consume the vapor of virtually any type of fuel INCLUDING Waste Vegetable Oil (wvo) & run for free or even extract some of the hydrogen from the exhaust to extend range.

  • The idea of turning a liquid fuel into a gas fuel by using exhaust heat works, and for is still working 3 years down. Much Much cleaner way of burning fossil fuels..............

  • hi cool video guy, I am going to build one too, but I have read that they are patented ?, & only 1 can be build by 1 person, to go on to a 20hp engine or smaller, do you know any thing about that guy ?.

    Thom In Scotland.

  • I have a dumb question.If the exaust bubbles the fuel ,What if you suffer from an exaust backfire.What kind of flame arrestor could be used?This has to be a critical feature of such a system.

  • I know Paul Pantone and this is all a bunch of B.S. He is a conman through and through.

  • @Progneto Really? How so? Now that your allegiance is affirmed, you are welcome to make an a$s of yourself some more. It's really quite entertaining you know...

    Geet lives!!!

  • Pantone says he and Mollie drove a Geet powered Suburban to all 48 lower states. At the time he told me that he wanted $20,000 to pay his legal bills and get going again. I made him an offer, let me and three other guys drive his Suburban on the Geet system from Salt Lake City to Wendover, Nv and back and we would invest the money. Guess what, one excuse after another. No one is driving a vehicle with the Geet system in the U.S. simply because it DOES NOT WORK. Prove me wrong!

  • @Progneto You almost were convincing enough until the Jekyll revealed his hideous persona in the most recent comment. Paul is merely stifled by those forces who desire to retain erudite edification under an esoteric mantilla of deceit This technology is proven on small engines with displacements below 25hp a vehicle shall require further custom engineering Although I'm working on a wvo generator conversion project, I'm inclined to expeditiously attend to my GEET version to satiate your nihilism.

  • @Begbucks LOL, you have proven that you can look up big words,,,now, prove that the GEET system works in a vehicle like Pantone says.

  • @Progneto In due time, in due time...

  • I like it how these guys like Pantone suck people in by saying you don't need an education in science to make this crap. Its works for him though as they are the only people who believe this shit!

  • You are one of the few that ever got a car to run on the GEET system. I know Paul Pantone the guy is nothing but a con artist. No one has ever got an engine to run like he says they will. Its funny how people still fall for this stuff.

  • @Progneto So wait you confess that a car can be made to run on the so call "bogus" system yet a moment ago you said it's impossible. ~~ People are you going to place faith in a corrupt "investor" who is a member of the elite in opposition to this discovery?

  • @Begbucks Yes, I saw ONE 1 and 1 ONE only car actually start using the GEET system. AS long as it was run at full throttle it would continue to struggle to run. The first time you dropped the throttle and tried to drive the car, it died. Wouldn't you think Pantone could make it "drive" a car if all his claims are true. I have NEVER SEEN any proof of a vehicle actually "driving" with the GEET system. Prove me wrong, please! I would love it if it did work!

  • @Progneto I feel thats due to either an improper mixture , or more likely a limited vapor capacity in other words a pre delivery canister to "vapor inject" the fuel, but again that might be a limitation to that design/ And once again here it would be foolish to chug of the proverbial infant with it's ablution.

    Most of the punctilious "proof" is held by some patent in the name of some oleaginous elitist ~ don't you know?

  • @Begbucks Don't forget, Pantone says he has been doing this for thirty years and "drove" his GEET powered Suburban to all 48 lower states yet when I and three other financially capable investors were willing to invest,, as long as the Suburban would do what he said, he only had excuses as to why the Suburban wasn't available. Sorry for the "run on sentence" but I stand by my point.

  • @Begbucks When Pantone performs his illusion with a small engine by pouring in Mt. Dew or urine, the engine is running on the fumes of the hydrocarbons, NOT the other materials. When the show is over, Pantone has to go pour out the junk he poured in. I've seen highly intelligent men try to make this thing work and they WANTED it to work, yet with Pantone's help it would NOT. All of you who read this, don't waste your time and money. Keep your carb or fuel injection!

  • @Progneto i agree its only the hydrocarbons that are burning the water of soft drink arnt burning, i have dine this test and eventually the engines stops running because it has used all the hydocarbons all thats left it the soft drink and water, the only way to use the whole lot is to heat the liquids via exhuast heat turning the soft drink into steam and ingesting that with the hydicarbons.

  • Paul Pantone is a Scam Artist. Soon he will be tarred and feathered by his angry student-investors. I have followed the GEET plans and built it. If you think Paul is for real then he is making you look stupid. Paul William Pantone: Social Security Number: 569-74-6239

    Date of Birth: 4 August 1950

  • @OregonHerbalist The only thing Paul is guilty off is a mortal hit to your usurious domineering ego.

  • @OregonHerbalist He already has been. Because of his scheme he spent quite a bit of time as a guest of the State of Utah in their mental hospital. The guy is certifiably nuts!

  • Have been able to run it on real alternatives like water?

  • ON youtube, I saw a number of French Farmers building their own Pantone system out in their barns' workshops, (based on the pantone plan). They all claimed it worked. As one guy said (as he went driving off into his field with the tractor perculating merrily under him) The only people who won't like this are the Petrol providers & the Taxman.... and the latter is liable to Jail us simply for having diminished his "cut" of our labors.

  • @briquetaverne Yes indeed you are very correct. Since GEET operates off vapor, most any combustible fuel source can be utilized not only limited to liquids. Once again; to reiterate The only people who contravene this proven invention are those who have made their opprobrious stance against prevalent here on YT.

  • Try a simple vapor carb, geet system is a scam!

    This paul pantone scam people for over 30 years on a simple heated vapor carb.

  • how's the miles per gallon?

  • @water2gashawaii 0 miles per gallon because it simply does not work

  • @Progneto Hmm isn't that interesting, A shifty character this "Progneto" is, elsewhere in this post he actually admitted THAT THIS GEET WORKS yet again he has had a change of heart to the contrary. Could it be Progneto is infact himself delusional?

  • flickr. com/photos/37257699@N03/

  • IS that a gas engine

  • Add a HHO Cell. Use Both.

  • Good work! To bad you didn't experience mileage gains. But if the fuel is for free, you save money anyway!

    Do you use any water in to the fuel? I am experiencing that water can help the mileage increase. But I only have experience with my turbodiesel car.

  • how do you use water water does not work good in my diesels I run any kind of oil to

  • Did i hear right? smells cleaner, But no mpg gain? Well done for trying a posting, All contribute to those seeking more data wich this is. However a hho cell would be way more beneficial i feel and a lot let work too. Keep posting.

  • Google: automotive x-prize

    There is a $10 million reward for a fuel efficient car. Registration is closed, but

    you can click on the online form link and tell them you have technology to contribute. Let us know how it goes

  • @talos1964 its all bull shit They kill Stanley Meyer. the man who run car with just water

  • yo michael its grahame from moranbah,i lost ur email address mate,i wanna ask you if your old man still has some pix of my old messerschmitt. cheers grahame

  • i wont ask you, if i can connect this device to mai injector system engine?

  • did u try to mix anything like water and whatever else to run your car? and do u feel any power difference.? look up geet mod it should help

  • any new updates you could show off?

  • Very cool mate, did you make the whole setup yourself? Have you played with the Browns gas idea yet? Know where to get kits from Australia (NSW possibly)?

  • Thrttole should be befor the reactor between bubbler and reactor, use your fuel tank for a bubbler its bigger and betterm if its steel that is good, use lawnmower carborators two of them, vacumm relief valves two of them, a cork in the intake air with the valves in it, exhuast into the bubbler 1/4-3/8 diameter, fresh air into bubbler not required, but is ok somtimes. Let me know how its going ? What rod size?? reactor length? Thanks again Friend GREAT JOB!!!!

  • what is the point of the vacuum valves and how do they work??

  • The vac valves work when the engine revs up to higher RPMs the valves open and let fresh air in and alow the car to rev up faster, and use less fuel, becuase it releaves the choke on the system, the system likes to be choked or in high vacuum, so the valves allow vacuum till a certain point then open to let air in becuase no more fuel is needed also to lessen the amount of vac on the Geet system. I will show mine soon, I have to make a double one becuase i have a B17A DOHC VTEC.

  • Please make some vids on your projects!

  • Wow that is great. Too bad you did not get any more gain on the MPG.

  • That sounds like crap when you gave it some fuel beyond idle.

  • That sound is the fan clutch or clutch fan on the radiator it is stuck, becuase its a old car thay have those, trucks have them alot too. Its sounded fine.

  • unforunately i havent done much more inprovements, to many other projects that are of interest, freaking FUEL!!!, just for interest sake i have been copying the tyres into fuel from the other companys, i work at a tyre shop so tyres are cheap. i have also been running my toyota hilux diesel on compressor oil and also gear lube. i have been getting about 100km extra out of my tank then i do biodiesel.. just food for thought

    good luck everybody trying to screw the oil companys.....

  • Just curious, with time passing, have you improved your set up and noticed little things you have changed to get any gains? Respectfully...David

  • This is exactly what we want a car that can burn anything. MPG could be improved, if you notice a lot of the designs are maintaining a heat threshold between the bubbler and the exhaust heat. There has to be a true differential for this to work correctly. The colder the air intake, and the hotter the reaction chamber is the better.

    Direct hot exhaust from the port is 750F the farther you move the reaction chamber, plus underlying air movement underneath. There is a loss of heat. --sirHOAX-- :)

  • Hi guys!

    Sorry for the nonsense comment!

    I had another comment before but it's not made at threw..

    -What I was saying is that I would like to make a geet system on a car but I have no way to figure out the dimensions for at!

    I have plans for a mover but not for car.

    Please, if someone could help me that would be great!

    The exhaust diameter is 50 mm.

    And a car is diesel.

    Which is I'm not sure how would run on the geet system, but I see a lot of diesel engine conversion on French websites.

    Thanks!

  • Oh and it's diesel!

  • Also, theoretically the vertical rods are twice as efficient as horizontal ones, if they are completely enclosed by the exhaust manifold.

    So only half the length would be required.

  • i got the lenghs of a website.

    Fuel 184mm

    water 65mm

    Diesel 85mm

  • how do you tune the reactor rod?

  • Some of the exhaust gas is meant to be recirculating back through into the bubbler not air,(no air goes into the bubbler)this is critical as the carbon from the fuel and the burnt gases are required to release the hydrogen in the H2O by reacting with the oxygen in H2O. CO+H20= H2+CO2 The gases in the heat exchange part of the GEET reactor must have no air and the reactor part and rod must be made of Iron as it is a catalyst. Air doesnt enter the fuel until just before the engine intake manifold.

  • Dont get me wrong I admire your workmanship, effort and Aussie can do attitude. 5 Stars well done.

  • So I guess you haven't used SPAD or Systeme G?

    They're different than Pantone's plans, but easier and more efficient.

    You just dope exhaust gas and primary fuel in water, mix with fresh air just before it goes into the reactor.

    Very similar to this system. But this one is unique.

  • No I havent used SPAD or System G.

    But to produce the Hydrogen to enrich the gas you need something to oxidise so the Oxygen From H2O bonds with something else other than the Hydrogen,leaving the hydrogen free for combustion.(In GEET it is the carbon from both the Hydrocarbon fuel and the exhaust gas CO)If there is air fed in prior to the reactor the free oxygen from the air will bond with the carbon and there will be no Hydrogen boost to the fuel.Thats why he isnt getting better fuel economy.

  • I agree with using exhaust gases through the bubbler. After a week of reciculating exhaust gases, the mixture in the bubbler will be more potent that you can lean further the carburetor. It is also best to send the carburetor output to the reactor before going to the intake manifold. Carburetor air intake should be replaced with exhaust gases while fresh air is only added after the carburetor.

  • oops i mean increase the air

  • i have done the magnetic measurement of the reactor rod it is 184mm long it tuned for petrol. definietly will look at reducing the air going into the reactor to try lean it out a bit.cheerss

  • nice!

  • Kick ass mate!

    I aggree with mielectric1, consider increasing the volume of air going through the reactor.

    Also, consider cooling the output of the pantone, that seems to help mine.

    You've got the best looking rig I've seen in any car. Like what you did with the Holly mixing bowl.

  • wouldnt running on old sump oil be considered a gain in mileage considering it normally wouldnt get you anywhere if you put sump oil in a regular carby?

    great job BTW-have you done the reactor rod tuning they talk about?

  • thats a lot of work there m8 keep at it, and see what ya find. maybe increase the volume of air going through the reactor, and therefore lower the vacuum applied, which means it will vaporize less fuel, and hopefully lean it out. Good work, though.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more