First off, the oldest light we've found is 13.7 billion years old. This was one of the reasons for the Big Bang theeory, that light couldn't move very far because it was so compressed before the Bang. Second, lol at 2:51 , 470 years left and we're still apes with jeans. xD
Darwinism is a relic unto itself as ALL human ancestral relics have been hoaxed. It's sad how folks cling to a debunked field of study; how they evolve into lumbering wrecks when their Faith is challenged point-by-point. The lifeforms of our humble planet appear, thrive, adapt and disappear for reasons yet unknown. Clouding the mystery with Latin designations & double-talk is profitable but not beneficial to the general populace whose tax money buoys this hokum.
Our universe (of multiverse) is only 15 to 20 billion years, and our solar system is approximately 5 billion year. Evolutionary time is too complicated to represent in this short humor-intended film. Remember, God is human best imaginary friend. We will one day become God once we're able to create new life-form in a lab.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Nice video, but 'evolution' is an outdated, unsubstantiated theory. It's really interesting though how humans have the ability to see patterns where there are none..
I believe you have a right to say that. Evolution isn't very logical. But, neither is Pangaea. It's just enough for us to get by until something better comes. I'll say it's more logical than God making everything the way it is right now, though.
all the biological data base on evolution "theory"..it has many accurate sides that we must accept ..but if the evolution says that there is no GOD, where the subtances which form the bacteria (the first livin organism in the video) come from????..
if anyone believe that this is video is accurate about evolution, you obviously have no knowledge of the subject. and 350 billion years? this probably wasn't even made as an informational video. mammals from reptiles? think people. stop letting people think for you.
We did not evolve from dinosaurs, but we evolved from the same organisms, it all depends on your geographic location, and the circumstances you're dealt.
Oh, how did we rise from the muck?They say it just happened by good luck!The only way we advanceIs by the hand of chanceSo prance, prance, pranceto the Darwin dance!
A frog turned into a handsome princeWe call that a fairy taleBut say that evolution did itGet a PhD from Yale Good-bye, Darwin, good-byeWe've had enough of your lieGood-bye, Darwin, good-bye
I belive in the evolution but i don't think humans were flesh eating dinosaur formed preditors before they turned to apes. I think humans began to look like apes-like creatures when the dinousaurs died out, before that i think we were the little mamals who survived.
The funniest thing about the whole "survival of the fittest/we evolved from a small species" idea is that if humans evolved from progressing through each of these species, the species that we evloved from would no longer be around. It would only be humans and no other species.
Sorry guys, try again. Make the next attempt a little more realistic because your theories sound no more plausible than the old man in the sky theory.
there are some skeletal remains of our ancestors. you can see how over time the skull gradually increased in valume.
the 'missing links' in evolution simply haven't been found yet. because its very rare for a fossil to form. most bones disintergrate over time and nothing of them remains. the conditions have to be just right for a fossil to form. that's why there are so few ancient bones left for us to find
You're right; scientists just sat in a room, blasted out of their minds and gave random names out of a latin dictionary to some chicken bones on their plate. And Dinosaurs are really just a thousand years old, and that it only took a week to make a few molecules of stardust into a fully functioning, multi-layered sphere teeming with life. That made sense, in a world that was thought to be flat.
We have found the skeletal remains of several hundred human ancestors.
The ancestral list appears to be as follows (given in radiometric date order):
Sahalenthropis Thcadensis -> Australopithecus afarensis -> Homo habilis -> Homo georgicus -> Homo ergaster -> Homo heidelbergensis -> Homo antecessor -> Homo sapien idaltu -> Homo sapiens sapiens.
And you can look up the skeleton for any of those. Note that the brain cavity size for these are in ranges that are continuous but distinct.
Really? We can fulfill all the ecological criteria of a) converting bacteria at the bottom of the ocean into refined elements like hydrogen, carbon, etc. b) eating carrion and c) eat the parasites stuck to the underside of a shark? Yup, no reasonable explanation to that. You experts really don't need science, you just "go by the gut".
Not true. Only if the ancestors lived in the same place & consumed the same resources & were significantly worse & did not themselves evolve.
The most obvious examples are chimpanzees which stayed in trees and thick jungle, while hominids split from them and lived on the savanah (they walked upright). The older hominids which *DID* live on the land *DID* get beat by the more successful hominids, but the chimps were unaffected because they weren't competing with hominids.
I think it's incrediblly good.I think that at the end it's saying that the human species is going to eventually go extinct because we're getting so lazy,but I could be trying to hard.
Very pretty, and does cover some of the major events in the evolution of human life. However, the earliest life (in the form of self-replicating RNA molecules) is estimated to have appeared around 3.9 - 4.1 billion years ago, not 350 billion years ago as suggested in this video. The age of the universe (as estimated by such models as NASA's WMAP Project or the Friedman Equation) is between 13.7 - 15 billion years.
Comment removed
websnarf 1 year ago
the name of this track
chelis26 2 years ago
First off, the oldest light we've found is 13.7 billion years old. This was one of the reasons for the Big Bang theeory, that light couldn't move very far because it was so compressed before the Bang. Second, lol at 2:51 , 470 years left and we're still apes with jeans. xD
QWNZU 2 years ago
no matter my friend,we still evolved.
smashbeans 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Darwinism is a relic unto itself as ALL human ancestral relics have been hoaxed. It's sad how folks cling to a debunked field of study; how they evolve into lumbering wrecks when their Faith is challenged point-by-point. The lifeforms of our humble planet appear, thrive, adapt and disappear for reasons yet unknown. Clouding the mystery with Latin designations & double-talk is profitable but not beneficial to the general populace whose tax money buoys this hokum.
procommenter 2 years ago
The song called right here right now.
Bwb678 3 years ago
Our universe (of multiverse) is only 15 to 20 billion years, and our solar system is approximately 5 billion year. Evolutionary time is too complicated to represent in this short humor-intended film. Remember, God is human best imaginary friend. We will one day become God once we're able to create new life-form in a lab.
Tristar10h 4 years ago
lol
maharlika329 3 years ago
FATBOY SLIM !
Drakma64 4 years ago
Whats the song called
theinsane102 3 years ago
exelente video se apega a las teoris modernas felicidadez
AXOLOT68 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Nice video, but 'evolution' is an outdated, unsubstantiated theory. It's really interesting though how humans have the ability to see patterns where there are none..
tweezy100 4 years ago
then where did we come from do you propose
theinsane102 3 years ago
I believe you have a right to say that. Evolution isn't very logical. But, neither is Pangaea. It's just enough for us to get by until something better comes. I'll say it's more logical than God making everything the way it is right now, though.
QWNZU 2 years ago
hahah fun at 2:30
turoid2 4 years ago
all the biological data base on evolution "theory"..it has many accurate sides that we must accept ..but if the evolution says that there is no GOD, where the subtances which form the bacteria (the first livin organism in the video) come from????..
hunter8435 4 years ago
The only thing that God is, is a temporary reason for the things that have yet to be explained.
IAmRodyle 4 years ago 2
yes of course there is no doubt that the GOD exists
hunter8435 4 years ago
it funny that a monkey evolved from a chameleon
sankaii 4 years ago
Love the endung !ROFL!
smoky90210 4 years ago
Good video and good sinthesis of evolution
cutterhead 4 years ago
i really need your video for a work of the school please add me !
mi msn is thiiare_ (is hotmail)
Thiareshita 4 years ago
if anyone believe that this is video is accurate about evolution, you obviously have no knowledge of the subject. and 350 billion years? this probably wasn't even made as an informational video. mammals from reptiles? think people. stop letting people think for you.
the360buddha 4 years ago
Get your head out of your ass, dude!!! Any idiot can see that this is not an accurate picture of evolution!!!!!!
1godlessmonkey 4 years ago
That's amusing though because the mammalian line did evolve from reptiles about 175 million years ago in the Jurassic period.
mastermorality09 3 years ago
Nice music and production but the evolution concept is completely silly.
fernandop1 4 years ago
We did not evolve from dinosaurs, but we evolved from the same organisms, it all depends on your geographic location, and the circumstances you're dealt.
hayes712 4 years ago
I believe in evolution, and adamns1619 you're a retard. Really... you are.
hayes712 4 years ago
wait a minutue 350 billion years ago???wasn't earth only 4.5 billion years old?
tickle155 4 years ago
Oh, how did we rise from the muck?They say it just happened by good luck!The only way we advanceIs by the hand of chanceSo prance, prance, pranceto the Darwin dance!
A frog turned into a handsome princeWe call that a fairy taleBut say that evolution did itGet a PhD from Yale Good-bye, Darwin, good-byeWe've had enough of your lieGood-bye, Darwin, good-bye
adams1619 4 years ago
I belive in the evolution but i don't think humans were flesh eating dinosaur formed preditors before they turned to apes. I think humans began to look like apes-like creatures when the dinousaurs died out, before that i think we were the little mamals who survived.
Gingagirl 4 years ago
someone who remembered their high school biology! This isn't an (absolutely) mindless thread after all.
MindForge83 4 years ago 2
The funniest thing about the whole "survival of the fittest/we evolved from a small species" idea is that if humans evolved from progressing through each of these species, the species that we evloved from would no longer be around. It would only be humans and no other species.
Sorry guys, try again. Make the next attempt a little more realistic because your theories sound no more plausible than the old man in the sky theory.
biller05 4 years ago
the animals we evolved from are not the ones that exist today. they are our cousins not our ancestors.
all the animals alive today are descendents of animals that died a long time ago
PresidentLuthor 4 years ago
So who was the human's ancestors?
Why haven't we found any skeletal remains of our ancestors?
biller05 4 years ago
the human's ancestor was an ape-like creature, from whom both the humans and the apes that are alive today came from.
PresidentLuthor 4 years ago
there are some skeletal remains of our ancestors. you can see how over time the skull gradually increased in valume.
the 'missing links' in evolution simply haven't been found yet. because its very rare for a fossil to form. most bones disintergrate over time and nothing of them remains. the conditions have to be just right for a fossil to form. that's why there are so few ancient bones left for us to find
PresidentLuthor 4 years ago
You're right; scientists just sat in a room, blasted out of their minds and gave random names out of a latin dictionary to some chicken bones on their plate. And Dinosaurs are really just a thousand years old, and that it only took a week to make a few molecules of stardust into a fully functioning, multi-layered sphere teeming with life. That made sense, in a world that was thought to be flat.
MindForge83 4 years ago
We have found the skeletal remains of several hundred human ancestors.
The ancestral list appears to be as follows (given in radiometric date order):
Sahalenthropis Thcadensis -> Australopithecus afarensis -> Homo habilis -> Homo georgicus -> Homo ergaster -> Homo heidelbergensis -> Homo antecessor -> Homo sapien idaltu -> Homo sapiens sapiens.
And you can look up the skeleton for any of those. Note that the brain cavity size for these are in ranges that are continuous but distinct.
websnarf 2 years ago
Really? We can fulfill all the ecological criteria of a) converting bacteria at the bottom of the ocean into refined elements like hydrogen, carbon, etc. b) eating carrion and c) eat the parasites stuck to the underside of a shark? Yup, no reasonable explanation to that. You experts really don't need science, you just "go by the gut".
MindForge83 4 years ago
Not true. Only if the ancestors lived in the same place & consumed the same resources & were significantly worse & did not themselves evolve.
The most obvious examples are chimpanzees which stayed in trees and thick jungle, while hominids split from them and lived on the savanah (they walked upright). The older hominids which *DID* live on the land *DID* get beat by the more successful hominids, but the chimps were unaffected because they weren't competing with hominids.
websnarf 2 years ago
I think it's incrediblly good.I think that at the end it's saying that the human species is going to eventually go extinct because we're getting so lazy,but I could be trying to hard.
warcraft125 4 years ago
nice music... whats the title of that song?
urban05 4 years ago
Right Here, Right Now (Seriously, from Fatboy Slim)
DoggySpew 4 years ago
Very pretty, and does cover some of the major events in the evolution of human life. However, the earliest life (in the form of self-replicating RNA molecules) is estimated to have appeared around 3.9 - 4.1 billion years ago, not 350 billion years ago as suggested in this video. The age of the universe (as estimated by such models as NASA's WMAP Project or the Friedman Equation) is between 13.7 - 15 billion years.
Inaccurate, but pretty.
jlfilter 5 years ago 2
HAHAHAHHHAHA
vaticinus 5 years ago