Hypocrisy: HannibalBarca13 loses the debate before it even begins.

[TheNarcMan]

Why do the "pwnage" videos of the mentally unwell always a) fail and b) leave you felling dirty?

[TheGzeus]

@theticketybooboo I have a video on my channel with explicit instructions on the correct way to address pyrrho.

[GirlonFilm1969]

We must've been thinking the same thing at the same time. Damn, I just found this video.

[HeavyTrafficAhead]

Why, exactly, is this hypocrisy? So I believe in proper sourcing for when I get my news, but because I enjoy a sitcom that makes me a hypocrite? It does not follow. Why are you comparing a parody, no matter your taste, to a request for properly sourced material in a debate? The material in this video has no relation to the subject of the matter. Sorry, FAIL

[pyrrho314]

@theticketybooboo : also, I have said recently that he's wrong in this projection of a cult, and that this is clear in one of his exchanges with ImaDot as well as elsewhere. But hey, that's what we're here to discuss.

[MrWarrenLO]

@pyrrho314

Sorry Pyrrho but no.

He interjected himself into the subject with rhetoric which wouldn't have been out of place in a movie like 300; he's misrepresented, perverted and distorted the argument and the people making said argument time after time all before writing the argument off as trivial so he could explain to retards that chimps don't have tails.

Then he comes back does the exact same shit but cranks it up to 11 by calling us mass murders and cultists.

He's a twat.

[pyrrho314]

@theticketybooboo : um, did you see gary calling him fat etc etc right off the bat. When you lower the bar, it's lowered. You have to swim with the other guys shit too, you don't just get to provide all the sewage personally.

That doesn't make him sleazy any more than it makes gary sleazy. Some people don't take as kindly to such insults as I do.

[pyrrho314]

@theticketybooboo : he's obviously not sleazy. You should realize if it seems that way this is rhetorical distortions... this is how something looks through a prism. Hannibal is pretty obviously not sleazy at all.

You have nothing to base such an accusation on unless it's a personal sense of protection that requires demonizing anything at all intellectually threatening. Sleazy? pleeeaaauuuz. That's like letting sleazy people off the hook to use that word in this case.

[pyrrho314]

@theticketybooboo : oh, perhaps I have missed it. Do you have an example where Hannibal lied about his sources? or otherwise? not "was wrong in his interpretation" but lied about the source material?

[GirlonFilm1969]

@pyrrho314 well i have an example. The guy lied about scientific data in order to try and 'catch' the person he was debating in some trap. We all know Pyrrho that if you are serious about scientific inquiry you don't do that to the person you're debating. So yeah, there's the example. And if you need proof of this watch this

watch?v=EEr2hdzs3fA

there

[pyrrho314]

@theticketybooboo : I mean not trusting that he's honest with his sources.

[pyrrho314]

@theticketybooboo : bs, you don't want to face it.

[theRoseofmyheart]

omg that guy is such pig weiner