i think u need a life u wanna say 911 was a conspiracy then tell that to the over 5000 people who died and over 100000 people who lost some one that day
Ok, this is just plain retarded. The plane did crash, and the reason there is nothing that resembles a plane, bodies, or luggage is because the plane impacted the ground at such an extreme speed and nose-down angle, causing the entire plane and everything in it to disintegrate on impact. And there was no fire because although jet fuel was all over the site, there was no spark to set it off. Lastly, they found wreckage big enough at the site to distinguish UNITED AIRLINES' livery. Enough for ya?
I heard there was a phone call from someone about an hour after Flight 93 "crashed" in Pennsylvania, that a plane landed in Cleavlandm Ohio because there were threats of a bomb on board. It was later confirmed that this flight was flight 93.
@1947rande I think you sound very much like a RETARD and an ignorant conspiracy theorist...am I right? Let me guess, TARD......you voted for Obama, right?? I'll bet the 911 attacks, in YOUR mind, were perpetrated by the Bush administration... And I'll just bet you voted for Obama because you're so damn dumb that you ACTUALLY believe that that LOSER somehow offered hope for some kind of positive "CHANGE." Well, thanks to assholes and fools like you, this country is in REAL trouble.
For all who say that the plane would have incinerated, jet fuel can't melt titanium engines. If the plane went in at full speed there would still be evidence of it. Turkish airlines flight 981 went into the ground at full speed and there was tons of wreckage from it at the crash site. Also, debris was spread over 4 miles away, I don't think a crash could send debris 4 miles. The plane could have been shot down.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@1947rande why don't you shut the fuck up and try and use some common sense and exercise your smarts a little bit? You dumb shit, you're expecting to to find any "drops of blood" at a jetliner crash site?? ...or body parts, even..where the plane was known to have gone almost straight down into the ground? You really should do your family AND yourself a favor and HANG YOURSELF IN YOUR BASEMENT.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@laMino2192 Oh, OK tough guy. I'll be there in a day or two...let me get a flight lined up. . what's the matter, douche bag? my comments make too much sense for you and you just don't know how to explain your conspiracy theory adequately enough to establish credibility with intelligent people? Look, you and anyone and everyone on this site who somehow believe there was some sort of Government conspiracy behind these hijackings is a DUMB, MOTHERFUCKING ASSHOLE WITH NO BRAIN OR ABILITY TO THINK.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
ok ur a fucking idiot..the reason there are no plane parts are because of the effect of the impact it wud have incinerated everything in a second with a crash that hit that hard...and the bodies were burnt...flight 93 crashed and thats that...
ok ur a fucking idiot..the reason there are no plane parts are because of the effect of the impact it wud have incinerated everything in a second with a crash that hit that hard...and the bodies were burnt...flight 93 crashed and thats that...
Don't put "proof" because you didn't prove anything to me. Think about this... 99% of crashes the pilot can at least come in at some kind of angle but does anyone really know what it looks like when a plane going hundreds of miles an hour crashes straight into the earth? The planes that went into the trade center bldgs made a very similar scare. The plane could have been 100 ft deep crushed way more than the parts left by a plane that crashes at an angle. HAVE SOME RESPECT FOR THE FAMILIES!
@soslokingb I will respect the families if I can get some sort of factual evidence that the passengers on the flight 93 list had Social Security info, school records, childhood pictures, proof of residency, health records and so on... that information should all be publicly accessible.
There may be peril in "waking up." Perhaps we should keep all of our tidbits of evidence OFF of YouTube until the right time. No use in setting off red flags.
Then were did it crash then genius, those men, women, of all ages deserve the right to heros for what they did. And if you can't give them the smallest amount of respect fuck you get out of America BITCH.
Now if you were refering to the begining, where I mention the WTC, its because they say the jet fuel "caused the collapse".. look at the crash site of flight 93.. WHERE IS THAT FIRE THAT WAS SOOOOO BAD IT MADE WTC COLLAPSE??
@ThaNME33 I grew up at La Aurora International Airport in Guatemala City, I have seen so many airplane accidents in my life and I totally agree with you. There are no body parts or airplane remains
from several reports the flight landed in cleveland international, and the passengers were shuffled off to a NASA base at the airport.. who knows what for... maybe experiments. who really knows
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ThaNME33 ARE YOU ON DRUGS YOU ASSHOLE? ...."several reports" the flight landed????????? reports from whom, you fucking idiot? ...reports from WHOM?
You really ARE a typical, ignorant conspiracy theorist, aren't you? tell me, did you even graduate from High School? You really should shut your computer down and do yourself a favor and just sit and play with yourself or something so you don't hurt yourself.
Is it not the case that the American people cannot accept the fact that the American government tried to con them but they accept the lie or expose their country to worldwide condemnatation. To dig up the real truth would open a pandoras box. A rock and a hard place you could say.
heafers84.......Give it up pal. No plane crashed there. The wreckage and the carnage would have been awful. This site was prepared by people unknown to misslead the American population. There is enough crash scene footage around to show that this was no crash scene....but it is a crime scene. A crime against the people of america., and humanity for highly political reasons.
@lovetogokiev .........Its easy to kid Americans, they are so gullable, most of them are in therapy anyway. Father Christmas does not exist....if he did one of you dickheads would blow him away as an intruder.
i like how you show plane wreckage of planes that didn't crash in the same manner as flight 93 at all, in all of the video that you show of plane crashes, the planes weren't nose diving, they were trying to crash land, very different. Flight 93 basically buried, these planes skidded accross the ground shedding large parts. Flight 93 nose dived into the ground, buried the engine, which was dug up, there are pictures, and scattered luggage bodies and smaller plane parts all over the area
Moron. can you show us other videos of planes that vanished after hitting the ground? also, once you pull your head out of the sand, also try to explain how the fbi found the terrorist passport in nyc in the debris of the twin towers?
well the plane didn't vanish, that just makes you sound ignorant. It was just torn into small parts except for the engine that was buried 45 feet down, but here's videos of planes with very small debris pieces just flight 93
watch?v=ff7h7Ll8Dl4
watch?v=HRJQaBOUXp0
flight 4184, there are pictures on google, couldn't find a good video
actually here's a truther website citing multiple crashes
911research . wtc7 . net / pentagon / analysis / compare / jetcrashdebris . h t ml
the reason they found a passport is the same reason they found a thread patch after the challenger explosion. During the explosion the heat made light weight material rise above the flames then blown by the wind. I mean if a thread patch can survive an explosion that had exponentially more fuel and a debris field that would have covered more area than than any of the flights on 911. Then it doesn't sound to far fetched they could find a passport.
curious, are you a man or woman and what industry do you work in? i am not trying to expose you but only want to know what type of americans still think this way...did you go to college for 4 years and get a degree?
I'm 24 male, grew up in Hereford England, graduated with a bachelors degree in computer science from Chester, spent a year studying abroad at the University of Central Arkansas. Very pretty state, during which i became a part of the truth movment with friends i met named shane and brandon. Shane and I no longer believe in this nonsence and Brandon sort of doesn't but still has his doubts.
All the evidence points to a plane crashing in shanksville: eyewitness, dna, pictures, video
ok..thanks for the info...so you now believe the govt story? do you also believe that jfk was killed by a lone gunman? and okc bomb blast was done only by Mcveigh?
no idea on those two, i'm not even sure what okc stands for.
I believe the gov. used 911 to go to war for oil, but if the gov. was in on it why would almost all of the hijackers be from saudi arabia and not Iraq. The idea that SO many people were ok with the war in the beginning (BUSH had an 80 approval rating when it was announced about going to Iraq) just shows how stupid some people are though.
But no I don't believe the gov. had anyting to do with 9/11
okc is oklahoma city...there were no hijackers...i promise you that much...it was impossible for them to hit the towers and even more impossible to hit the pentagon. it was done by rogue members of our govt with the help of subcontracters..blackwater, kroll etc. lead up by our cia and covered up by our fbi...not all cia and not all fbi but top members and then they used rogue judges as needed to stop any attempts at legal challenges. it was clearly an inside job by a few people.
see that's the problem with the truth movement. there's not one subject that all agree on, everyone has their own opinions, and yes opinions.
You can never prove the cia, fbi, or blackwater were in on it. Saudi Arabia and the other countries would also have to be in on it, since they released a statement apologizing for the hijackers actions and confirming their involvment with terrorist organizations. Saudia Arabia also put to rest the claims that the hijackers were still alive
the problem is the government did a coverup job on the 9/11 commission report...that is the real problem...only an independent investigation will ever find the real truth...but, I will bet you now, that my version is closer to the truth than yours..why? because only the government had the ability to remove the evidence and cover it up. they also had the most to gain...bush, defense contractors, and oil companies...then you add in the coverup of enron, aig, etc. by detroying wt7.
destroying WTC7 would not have destroyed all information on enron. Companies and govs since the 90s have always backed up on multiple hdds/RAIDs and in multiple locations. And if they couldn't keep enron covered up, what makes you think that 9/11 could stay covered if it was an inside job.
What makes me think 911 could remain covered up. Look at JFK, RFK, and MLK. Each of those were covered up. If your government and media work together, they always stay covered up.
wow, the fires were never hot enough to melt the steel only weaken it. Plus in the WTC the jet fuel would have burned up in 10 minutes, the remaining fire was other stuff burning, what was flight 93 going to catch on fire DIRT?. You're no plane parts is absurd, witnesses found plane parts, 95% of the wreckage was found, and the coroner found over 1000 body parts, all which were DNA identified with the victims on the plane. the scar you find is in a different area also
wow. your pretty ignorant, arent you. (heafers84) LOL the hole in the ground is like 20 feet in width MAYBE.. not nearly big enough to fit a plane into.. USE LOGIC!!!! IF ANYTHING YOUR A FUCKIN AGENT!!!
wow logic, you say maybe 20 feet wide and that's your proof. Again, they found the engines, there were eyewitnesses, they found the black boxes, the coroner who didn't work for the gov. started collecting body parts that day, and through the next months identified all passengers through DNA, and all first responders saw plane debris and smelled burning fuel.
yea well funny how u try to bring up body parts.. since tho coroner said he stopped being coroner after about 15 minutes because there were no bodies... and just fyi there were NO plane engines, and a boeing 757 is 155 ft long, 44 ft high, with a 124 ft wing span... u try to tell me that an aircraft that size fits into a hole that size? HA HA thats like you trying to argue the incident at the pentagon... neither have evidence that a plane hit them.... WAKE UP. YOUR IN DENIAL..
the coroner was taken out of context, he said he was no longer a coroner b/c there were no "intact" bodies, but he states that he found over 1500 remains over the next few months. There were two engines found, one buried 45 feet down and it's at 911research and the other one rolled about 800 feet away. the main hole would be the size of the body of the plane not the wings, one wing hit while the other was torn apart as the plane rolled, as seen by eyewitnesses.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
@ThaNME33 how about YOU waking up and learning to at least spell before you post on here. The word is "you're" not "your" if you ever had even a small chance at legitimacy or credibility, you lost it with your ignorance about spelling such simple words.
If this were a court case and you brought 20ft wide hole( which the planes body is only 17ft in diameter) and I brought all of the evidence above, you'd be laughed out of the court room in about 5 minutes
i think u need a life u wanna say 911 was a conspiracy then tell that to the over 5000 people who died and over 100000 people who lost some one that day
tirebay123 2 weeks ago
Ok, this is just plain retarded. The plane did crash, and the reason there is nothing that resembles a plane, bodies, or luggage is because the plane impacted the ground at such an extreme speed and nose-down angle, causing the entire plane and everything in it to disintegrate on impact. And there was no fire because although jet fuel was all over the site, there was no spark to set it off. Lastly, they found wreckage big enough at the site to distinguish UNITED AIRLINES' livery. Enough for ya?
737boeing8 3 weeks ago
Another fact about 911 thats great put it with the rest of the 100s facts we all ready know.
berlinrelic 2 months ago
Wow, your a idiot. Why dont you grow a pair and suck it, also learn your facts before you try brainwashing people,stupid F****N GUY!
mikebr2592 5 months ago
I heard there was a phone call from someone about an hour after Flight 93 "crashed" in Pennsylvania, that a plane landed in Cleavlandm Ohio because there were threats of a bomb on board. It was later confirmed that this flight was flight 93.
fliktonik 5 months ago
9/11: INTERCEPTED - check this out. Good info, based on facts and evidence provided by the FAA, can't deny facts.
PurePowerPunk 7 months ago
I guess I'm still in denial then. Ecept about the fact that you are an idiot. This didn't prove a damn thing. Tyr harder or shut the fuck up.
dayradio65 7 months ago
I would like to see how far the united states could get with some of you cry baby bitches running the show...
lyonslife 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No scientist very true you are not but you are an idiot.
Cetawin 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1947rande I think you sound very much like a RETARD and an ignorant conspiracy theorist...am I right? Let me guess, TARD......you voted for Obama, right?? I'll bet the 911 attacks, in YOUR mind, were perpetrated by the Bush administration... And I'll just bet you voted for Obama because you're so damn dumb that you ACTUALLY believe that that LOSER somehow offered hope for some kind of positive "CHANGE." Well, thanks to assholes and fools like you, this country is in REAL trouble.
lovetogokiev 1 year ago
idk i say the impact that hard over 500 mph would have burnt evrything but ur rite bout the big scar so where did it actually crash
laMino2192 1 year ago
For all who say that the plane would have incinerated, jet fuel can't melt titanium engines. If the plane went in at full speed there would still be evidence of it. Turkish airlines flight 981 went into the ground at full speed and there was tons of wreckage from it at the crash site. Also, debris was spread over 4 miles away, I don't think a crash could send debris 4 miles. The plane could have been shot down.
TheDisturbedCow 1 year ago 20
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@1947rande why don't you shut the fuck up and try and use some common sense and exercise your smarts a little bit? You dumb shit, you're expecting to to find any "drops of blood" at a jetliner crash site?? ...or body parts, even..where the plane was known to have gone almost straight down into the ground? You really should do your family AND yourself a favor and HANG YOURSELF IN YOUR BASEMENT.
lovetogokiev 1 year ago
@lovetogokiev come to dallas 317nrthoakcliff and say shit to me c wat happens
laMino2192 1 year ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@laMino2192 Oh, OK tough guy. I'll be there in a day or two...let me get a flight lined up. . what's the matter, douche bag? my comments make too much sense for you and you just don't know how to explain your conspiracy theory adequately enough to establish credibility with intelligent people? Look, you and anyone and everyone on this site who somehow believe there was some sort of Government conspiracy behind these hijackings is a DUMB, MOTHERFUCKING ASSHOLE WITH NO BRAIN OR ABILITY TO THINK.
lovetogokiev 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ok ur a fucking idiot..the reason there are no plane parts are because of the effect of the impact it wud have incinerated everything in a second with a crash that hit that hard...and the bodies were burnt...flight 93 crashed and thats that...
minakoaino19 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ok ur a fucking idiot..the reason there are no plane parts are because of the effect of the impact it wud have incinerated everything in a second with a crash that hit that hard...and the bodies were burnt...flight 93 crashed and thats that...
minakoaino19 1 year ago
Don't put "proof" because you didn't prove anything to me. Think about this... 99% of crashes the pilot can at least come in at some kind of angle but does anyone really know what it looks like when a plane going hundreds of miles an hour crashes straight into the earth? The planes that went into the trade center bldgs made a very similar scare. The plane could have been 100 ft deep crushed way more than the parts left by a plane that crashes at an angle. HAVE SOME RESPECT FOR THE FAMILIES!
soslokingb 1 year ago
@soslokingb I will respect the families if I can get some sort of factual evidence that the passengers on the flight 93 list had Social Security info, school records, childhood pictures, proof of residency, health records and so on... that information should all be publicly accessible.
GOATBOYthaFAM 1 week ago
There may be peril in "waking up." Perhaps we should keep all of our tidbits of evidence OFF of YouTube until the right time. No use in setting off red flags.
6of6 1 year ago 2
Then were did it crash then genius, those men, women, of all ages deserve the right to heros for what they did. And if you can't give them the smallest amount of respect fuck you get out of America BITCH.
"This is our country"
Red-White-Blue fly it true.
rancheres07 2 years ago
Comment removed
JazTrumpett 2 years ago
Now if you were refering to the begining, where I mention the WTC, its because they say the jet fuel "caused the collapse".. look at the crash site of flight 93.. WHERE IS THAT FIRE THAT WAS SOOOOO BAD IT MADE WTC COLLAPSE??
ThaNME33 2 years ago 5
But YOU need to get your facts straight before you believe something so damn rediculous like the "offcial" gov't story..
dont believe what you hear do your own research.. wake up, 9/11 was a cover -up.period.
ThaNME33 2 years ago 7
@ThaNME33 I grew up at La Aurora International Airport in Guatemala City, I have seen so many airplane accidents in my life and I totally agree with you. There are no body parts or airplane remains
vetarossa 2 years ago
@JazTrumpett I highly doubt any of the cellphone calls originated on the planes. Just not possible. I tried it.
infoseeker264 1 year ago 16
Ok, if you don't think if that's Flight 93..Then where do you think it went?
fldoughboy72 2 years ago
from several reports the flight landed in cleveland international, and the passengers were shuffled off to a NASA base at the airport.. who knows what for... maybe experiments. who really knows
ThaNME33 2 years ago 14
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ThaNME33 ARE YOU ON DRUGS YOU ASSHOLE? ...."several reports" the flight landed????????? reports from whom, you fucking idiot? ...reports from WHOM?
You really ARE a typical, ignorant conspiracy theorist, aren't you? tell me, did you even graduate from High School? You really should shut your computer down and do yourself a favor and just sit and play with yourself or something so you don't hurt yourself.
lovetogokiev 1 year ago
Is it not the case that the American people cannot accept the fact that the American government tried to con them but they accept the lie or expose their country to worldwide condemnatation. To dig up the real truth would open a pandoras box. A rock and a hard place you could say.
ronald2394 2 years ago 5
heafers84.......Give it up pal. No plane crashed there. The wreckage and the carnage would have been awful. This site was prepared by people unknown to misslead the American population. There is enough crash scene footage around to show that this was no crash scene....but it is a crime scene. A crime against the people of america., and humanity for highly political reasons.
ronald2394 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ronald2394 and YOU'RE on drugs
lovetogokiev 1 year ago
@lovetogokiev .........Its easy to kid Americans, they are so gullable, most of them are in therapy anyway. Father Christmas does not exist....if he did one of you dickheads would blow him away as an intruder.
ronald2394 1 year ago 21
wow you really are an idiot arent you? @ heafers84.. glad you can show your level of brainwashing. Good job
ThaNME33 2 years ago
i like how you show plane wreckage of planes that didn't crash in the same manner as flight 93 at all, in all of the video that you show of plane crashes, the planes weren't nose diving, they were trying to crash land, very different. Flight 93 basically buried, these planes skidded accross the ground shedding large parts. Flight 93 nose dived into the ground, buried the engine, which was dug up, there are pictures, and scattered luggage bodies and smaller plane parts all over the area
heafers84 2 years ago
Moron. can you show us other videos of planes that vanished after hitting the ground? also, once you pull your head out of the sand, also try to explain how the fbi found the terrorist passport in nyc in the debris of the twin towers?
cotullaguy 2 years ago
well the plane didn't vanish, that just makes you sound ignorant. It was just torn into small parts except for the engine that was buried 45 feet down, but here's videos of planes with very small debris pieces just flight 93
watch?v=ff7h7Ll8Dl4
watch?v=HRJQaBOUXp0
flight 4184, there are pictures on google, couldn't find a good video
actually here's a truther website citing multiple crashes
911research . wtc7 . net / pentagon / analysis / compare / jetcrashdebris . h t ml
heafers84 2 years ago
the reason they found a passport is the same reason they found a thread patch after the challenger explosion. During the explosion the heat made light weight material rise above the flames then blown by the wind. I mean if a thread patch can survive an explosion that had exponentially more fuel and a debris field that would have covered more area than than any of the flights on 911. Then it doesn't sound to far fetched they could find a passport.
heafers84 2 years ago
curious, are you a man or woman and what industry do you work in? i am not trying to expose you but only want to know what type of americans still think this way...did you go to college for 4 years and get a degree?
cotullaguy 2 years ago
I'm 24 male, grew up in Hereford England, graduated with a bachelors degree in computer science from Chester, spent a year studying abroad at the University of Central Arkansas. Very pretty state, during which i became a part of the truth movment with friends i met named shane and brandon. Shane and I no longer believe in this nonsence and Brandon sort of doesn't but still has his doubts.
All the evidence points to a plane crashing in shanksville: eyewitness, dna, pictures, video
heafers84 2 years ago
ok..thanks for the info...so you now believe the govt story? do you also believe that jfk was killed by a lone gunman? and okc bomb blast was done only by Mcveigh?
cotullaguy 2 years ago
no idea on those two, i'm not even sure what okc stands for.
I believe the gov. used 911 to go to war for oil, but if the gov. was in on it why would almost all of the hijackers be from saudi arabia and not Iraq. The idea that SO many people were ok with the war in the beginning (BUSH had an 80 approval rating when it was announced about going to Iraq) just shows how stupid some people are though.
But no I don't believe the gov. had anyting to do with 9/11
heafers84 2 years ago
okc is oklahoma city...there were no hijackers...i promise you that much...it was impossible for them to hit the towers and even more impossible to hit the pentagon. it was done by rogue members of our govt with the help of subcontracters..blackwater, kroll etc. lead up by our cia and covered up by our fbi...not all cia and not all fbi but top members and then they used rogue judges as needed to stop any attempts at legal challenges. it was clearly an inside job by a few people.
cotullaguy 2 years ago
see that's the problem with the truth movement. there's not one subject that all agree on, everyone has their own opinions, and yes opinions.
You can never prove the cia, fbi, or blackwater were in on it. Saudi Arabia and the other countries would also have to be in on it, since they released a statement apologizing for the hijackers actions and confirming their involvment with terrorist organizations. Saudia Arabia also put to rest the claims that the hijackers were still alive
heafers84 2 years ago
the problem is the government did a coverup job on the 9/11 commission report...that is the real problem...only an independent investigation will ever find the real truth...but, I will bet you now, that my version is closer to the truth than yours..why? because only the government had the ability to remove the evidence and cover it up. they also had the most to gain...bush, defense contractors, and oil companies...then you add in the coverup of enron, aig, etc. by detroying wt7.
cotullaguy 2 years ago
destroying WTC7 would not have destroyed all information on enron. Companies and govs since the 90s have always backed up on multiple hdds/RAIDs and in multiple locations. And if they couldn't keep enron covered up, what makes you think that 9/11 could stay covered if it was an inside job.
heafers84 2 years ago
What makes me think 911 could remain covered up. Look at JFK, RFK, and MLK. Each of those were covered up. If your government and media work together, they always stay covered up.
cotullaguy 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@cotullaguy people with empty heads like yours shouldn't even be allowed to vote, you dumb ass
lovetogokiev 1 year ago
wow, the fires were never hot enough to melt the steel only weaken it. Plus in the WTC the jet fuel would have burned up in 10 minutes, the remaining fire was other stuff burning, what was flight 93 going to catch on fire DIRT?. You're no plane parts is absurd, witnesses found plane parts, 95% of the wreckage was found, and the coroner found over 1000 body parts, all which were DNA identified with the victims on the plane. the scar you find is in a different area also
Worst video ever!
heafers84 2 years ago
wow. your pretty ignorant, arent you. (heafers84) LOL the hole in the ground is like 20 feet in width MAYBE.. not nearly big enough to fit a plane into.. USE LOGIC!!!! IF ANYTHING YOUR A FUCKIN AGENT!!!
ThaNME33 2 years ago
wow logic, you say maybe 20 feet wide and that's your proof. Again, they found the engines, there were eyewitnesses, they found the black boxes, the coroner who didn't work for the gov. started collecting body parts that day, and through the next months identified all passengers through DNA, and all first responders saw plane debris and smelled burning fuel.
heafers84 2 years ago
yea well funny how u try to bring up body parts.. since tho coroner said he stopped being coroner after about 15 minutes because there were no bodies... and just fyi there were NO plane engines, and a boeing 757 is 155 ft long, 44 ft high, with a 124 ft wing span... u try to tell me that an aircraft that size fits into a hole that size? HA HA thats like you trying to argue the incident at the pentagon... neither have evidence that a plane hit them.... WAKE UP. YOUR IN DENIAL..
ThaNME33 2 years ago
the coroner was taken out of context, he said he was no longer a coroner b/c there were no "intact" bodies, but he states that he found over 1500 remains over the next few months. There were two engines found, one buried 45 feet down and it's at 911research and the other one rolled about 800 feet away. the main hole would be the size of the body of the plane not the wings, one wing hit while the other was torn apart as the plane rolled, as seen by eyewitnesses.
WAKE UP "YOU'RE" IN DENIAL
dhs03001 2 years ago
Comment removed
dhs03001 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ThaNME33 how about YOU waking up and learning to at least spell before you post on here. The word is "you're" not "your" if you ever had even a small chance at legitimacy or credibility, you lost it with your ignorance about spelling such simple words.
lovetogokiev 1 year ago
If this were a court case and you brought 20ft wide hole( which the planes body is only 17ft in diameter) and I brought all of the evidence above, you'd be laughed out of the court room in about 5 minutes
heafers84 2 years ago 4
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@ThaNME33 why don't you grow some fucking brain cells before posting on Youtube??
lovetogokiev 1 year ago
awsome video ! and the truth
stoneycwb 2 years ago 2