Bush & McCain Debate: Choice & Justices

[cpblackangel88]

I'm pro-choice yet I know Roe V Wade should be abolished as soon as possible. The constitution wouldn't allow it and the Democrats just did it to get those pro-choice voters. And position Republicans as the party of redneck christians.

[SeventhHanyou]

Stupid argument, and your information is misleading. Roe v. Wade wouldn't outlaw abortion--it would allow the federal government to defer to the authority of the states on the issue. That's the right thing to do. I am not interested in either outlawing or mandating abortion at the federal level...since sane, reasonable people can disagree on this issue, why not let them decide at a more local level?

I don't think half the pro-Roe people understand the decision.

[ninjairoc]

this video is flawed in that right after mccain said he wouldn't have a litmus test for his judges, obama said the exact same thing! come on now! get a real argument

[chomnoamskyy]

i agree with McCain. good man. roe v wade is a disgrace.

[BubbaFartinski]

Go McCain!

[silisane]

fuck you

[Velitoptorix]

Nonsense. If it was really about privacy and not about the state's right under the tenth amendment to regulate medical practice, why don't we have other rulings concerning the PATRIOT Act, wiretapping, telecomm immunity and the like evaluated under the so-called 'pen-umbra' created by various amendments plus the 9th amendment? Meaning, why can we spy on private citizens, but can't regulate medical infanticide? Answer: Crypto-nazis funding abortion mills and an industry of death's lobby. Got it?

[Velitoptorix]

Who wouldn't feel sorry for Sen. Obama? To be beaten in terms of the right way to pick justices, and by an old injured veteran? So sad.

[y2rock]

Roe vs Wade is flawed! I dont see how anyone can argue with that (Just Read it)!

[kkanya]

The diatribe/transcript associated with this video is retarded. Calling constructionist judges ideologues is a contradiction in terms. Further, perpetuating the myth that Roe v. Wade is under attack from anything less than an activist justice in the Ginsberg mold is just wrong. The bad Roe decision aside, very few justices are willing to attempt its overturn. Moreover, if it is overturned, abortion is not illegal - but rather legislated on by the states and taken out of the discourse (finally)!

[foreignthinker]

The legal principle in Roe v Wade was not abortion it was privacy. Everyone so anxious to overturn this ruling should think real hard about the personal privacy we have lost through legislation and executive branch abuses in the last 8 years. And ask themselves if they want to reverse this landmark case in the protection of not just a woman's, but everyone's right to personal privacy.

[Velitoptorix]

Nonsense. If it was really about privacy and not about the state's right under the tenth amendment to regulate medical practice, why don't we have other rulings concerning the PATRIOT Act, wiretapping, telecomm immunity and the like evaluated under the so-called 'pen-umbra' created by various amendments plus the 9th amendment? Meaning, why can we spy on private citizens, but can't regulate medical infanticide? Answer: Crypto-nazis funding abortion mills and an industry of death's lobby. Got it?

[foreignthinker]

You toss labels that do not apply, and ignore the fact abortion IS regulated. The Patriot act is being challenged in court, as has wiretapping in the past.

There are no abortion mills in the US, but I have a sense that if one abortion is performed in a building that qualifies it in your book. Yet US planes dropping bombs on newborn to adult civilians is OK. Or denying healthcare to those in need so they die a little earlier is fine. Just another love the fetus hate the child hypocrite.

[asawbl]

my a/c is broken! omg. im on cam too lol!

i love u Kr

[sngrmnsthsm]

Get Out & Barack The VOTE For Peace & Choice!!

VOTE For Real Change With Obama/Biden '08!!!!

[sisforshayla]

they're both full of crapola