L200'S SUCK !!! WOULD NEVER BUY ANOTHER THESE PIECES OF SHIT FALL APART WHEN TAKEN OFF ROAD LET ALONE CRASH DAMAGE ..BOUGHT A NEW FORD AND CANT BEAT IT ..... L200 CAC....
My main concern with a pick-up crash is what if there is a load in the back for example fence posts or scaffolding. Surely it would ram through the rear window and knock out/spear passengers and pin them to their seats.
Great truck, especially for it's 28 thousands US dollars cost. I drive the same more than year and I like it. It's a good four-drive truck. And it has very good 2,5 liter turbo-diesel engine.
Good result this one. I like SUV/4x4s and have driven them for 11 years now. They give you a feeling of safety but have basic faults. One being that rigid chassis/frame vehicles usually do not have progressive crumple zones and whiplash causes neck injuries. The Landrover Discovery crash test against the big French Renault Espace kinda was an eye opener too!
@knausspiano Most good SUVs have rigid and strong passenger cabins to stop intrugen and protect the occupants but have crumple zones to absorb the impact.
best 4x4 in its class. wouldnt drive anythin else especially not the ranger or hilux. they are both made to a cheap budget weras mitsubishi have made a fantastic motor.
I too would have considered a flexible frame in an accident being less desirable than a rigid frame, but I would recommend that you should research your statement and discover the information that has changed my mind.
I overturned one of this last year, it rolled three times and crashed a tree, I had to throw it away, but walked away from it without a scratch. I recomend L200 !
I'll never buy a Ford Ranger. One slammed into the back of my H3. This was my first accident on the highway ever! His car was smashed inward while mine was completely intact. Ranger build quality is TERRIBLY UNSAFE.
even in the rear, were there was no impact, with the shock it took it began to disintegrate,that means it's not that heavy duty on the long run...toyota hilux is tougher
It may seem nothing, but on the long run, giving it hell and bumps on the roads and rough terrain I think it won't last long as the old L200's, and mits suffer a little from rust too, great engine though. The Isuzu Dmax had it worse, even the roof folded, and the Hilux didn't pass the moose test. What it is happening with trucks today??? The old ones were tougher.Still confused on which to buy from those 3. Maybe and old Hilux will do
The chassis structure in these new ones is stronger than in old ones, because of these saftey reasons. :)
The front is only soft, because it has to be crumble zone. I bet if you drive old hilux there, it will get quite more smashed. And good feature is, now they are offering more locking differentials. In many ways, I think this new L200 is clearly better than the old.
Thanks for the reply. I know about the crumpling zones in the front being softer for better inpact. Still am confused what to buy. Got a softness for Hilux's :) lol
sharausha busca bien y econtrarás el video de la nissan navara y dmax de isuzu, pero de la hilux no hay, no se atrevieron, aunque de verdad lo hubieran hecho, la clasificación de la prueba de choque de la l200 fue de 4 estrellas, la isuzu dmax con 2 estrellas y la navara q fue la peor de todas con 2 estrellas y una tachada, total, q la nissan navara es una porquería, Mitsubishi rules!
Favor pongan el video de la toyota hilux o de la mazda bt-50 o nissan......, porque solo la mitsubishi tiene esta prueba. O es que las otras camionetas no se atreven?
We know that the Dodge Dakota here in US is a piece of crap truck, and because of that, it's always a hard sell for Dodge.....and Mitsubishi doesn't know that!
Since I love the Outlander, I'd like to ask this: is the Mitsu Outlander selling fairly in Europe alongside with its VW Tiguan & Land Rover Freelander competitors?
yeah mitsubbishi has been really stupid with their trucks in usa the raider is a peice of shit and who the hells idea was it to drp the montero and add the edavedor
Endeavor's not bad, but dropping the Montero in US was ridiculous. The 3rd gen Montero's the last one we got, while overseas, the Montero (a.k.a. Pajero) is already on its 4th gen. For Australian market, the 4th gen's 3.8 V6 has been retuned to match the HP & torque of the 4.0 V6 of the Nissan Pathfinder.
look 0:56, motor site goes shit, but the space of passengers doesn't notice nothing of impact
hhh41110 4 months ago
this is a strong van but the 3.2 gls triton is much more reinforced
nevadaragoonanan 1 year ago
whats the speed ? o0f the crash test
aamaritoo 1 year ago
all Mitsubishi 1 ton truck are available in all around the world at this time (since about 8 years ago) are assembly from THAILAND.
thaichubby101 1 year ago
@thaichubby101
Yes , at MMCT plant in Cholburi Thailand
It's debut with slogan "New era of mid-sized pick up"
It's having a less Cd
streesmut70 11 months ago
D-max is better!
nikooliver1 1 year ago
@nikooliver1 watch?v=pCtqFPfuKWs
bew2s 1 month ago
mutch better then nissan
okoskutya35 1 year ago
L200'S SUCK !!! WOULD NEVER BUY ANOTHER THESE PIECES OF SHIT FALL APART WHEN TAKEN OFF ROAD LET ALONE CRASH DAMAGE ..BOUGHT A NEW FORD AND CANT BEAT IT ..... L200 CAC....
facsache 1 year ago
sorry whee do i see how much stars this car got.. is defenitely than the ranger and navara but what about the hilux.. in terms of security--
fgarsa 1 year ago
Better than Ford.....
this is why we buy japanese the most.....
Athrunwong 1 year ago
@Athrunwong we live in america not japan but american stuff thats actually doesnt look like a piece and fall apart ford last way longer
TheGiggity999 1 year ago
ITS BETTER THAN THE FORD RANGER!
ljcayie 1 year ago
The crash test dummies have opened the tap of the fuel tank back there....
MDIVISIONRULES 1 year ago
@MDIVISIONRULES better than explode that, isnt? kkkkk
jampagm 1 year ago
safe...
igorribeiroleao 1 year ago
nice and safe!
pergousongandra 1 year ago
My main concern with a pick-up crash is what if there is a load in the back for example fence posts or scaffolding. Surely it would ram through the rear window and knock out/spear passengers and pin them to their seats.
HoodedFig900 1 year ago
Unless its pointing into the window, I highly doubt it.
wheeman999 1 year ago
flex is good.!.....stiff is bad if you are involved in a crash.
vikingforyou 2 years ago 2
good for you not the truck but i guese the person is all that matters but still imports dont make pickups like americans
atgskater14 2 years ago
to many small pieces of plastic is flying every where
jorgeykami 2 years ago
I agree, it would cut and fuck up everyone inside. Theyd come out alive but only bearly..
what speed is this? it looks like 100k but i bet its only 50
Dynaverse 2 years ago
the frontal impact is usually done about 60km/h.
for amazing crash test at 100km/h search for "old commodore crash test"
boothyno19 1 year ago
POS!
theedevious1 2 years ago
Great truck, especially for it's 28 thousands US dollars cost. I drive the same more than year and I like it. It's a good four-drive truck. And it has very good 2,5 liter turbo-diesel engine.
vadimmart 2 years ago
Good result this one. I like SUV/4x4s and have driven them for 11 years now. They give you a feeling of safety but have basic faults. One being that rigid chassis/frame vehicles usually do not have progressive crumple zones and whiplash causes neck injuries. The Landrover Discovery crash test against the big French Renault Espace kinda was an eye opener too!
knausspiano 2 years ago
@knausspiano Most good SUVs have rigid and strong passenger cabins to stop intrugen and protect the occupants but have crumple zones to absorb the impact.
1ohtaf1 2 years ago
best 4x4 in its class. wouldnt drive anythin else especially not the ranger or hilux. they are both made to a cheap budget weras mitsubishi have made a fantastic motor.
Shadow1066 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wat a flexable peice of shit check out toyota hilux crash test strongest 4x4
chris8beach 2 years ago
I too would have considered a flexible frame in an accident being less desirable than a rigid frame, but I would recommend that you should research your statement and discover the information that has changed my mind.
Qrazii 2 years ago
the result?
it seem ok to me...
btw, the L200 scored the best in its category...
shunichi 2 years ago
looks like paper.
samdam1000 2 years ago
I overturned one of this last year, it rolled three times and crashed a tree, I had to throw it away, but walked away from it without a scratch. I recomend L200 !
facmibaity 2 years ago 4
recycle
SneakieBillTV 2 years ago
really good! much better than ford ranger
kikecacique 2 years ago 28
Comparing to its competitors, .ie., Ford Ranger, Nissan Nevara, Isuzu D-Max. This one score the best for EuroNCAP.
tsripramong 2 years ago 3
@kikecacique hahahahahaha!!! your a joke
lovethesouthcoast 1 year ago
@kikecacique
I'll never buy a Ford Ranger. One slammed into the back of my H3. This was my first accident on the highway ever! His car was smashed inward while mine was completely intact. Ranger build quality is TERRIBLY UNSAFE.
Rsimon859 1 year ago
gerard 12668 the fasist
BledaTurk 2 years ago
even in the rear, were there was no impact, with the shock it took it began to disintegrate,that means it's not that heavy duty on the long run...toyota hilux is tougher
Ayrton4everrr 2 years ago
You are talking about the plastic cover on the load bin ?
jgoosen 2 years ago
Yes , the piece of plastic behind the rear door.
It may seem nothing, but on the long run, giving it hell and bumps on the roads and rough terrain I think it won't last long as the old L200's, and mits suffer a little from rust too, great engine though. The Isuzu Dmax had it worse, even the roof folded, and the Hilux didn't pass the moose test. What it is happening with trucks today??? The old ones were tougher.Still confused on which to buy from those 3. Maybe and old Hilux will do
Ayrton4everrr 2 years ago
Rubbish. Do you know how much forces it put to the chassis to drive 60km/h to wall? Hilux would do exactly same, it aint any stronger.
In front suspension arm design and differentials hilux have always been weaker than L200.
offfiman 2 years ago
The chassis structure in these new ones is stronger than in old ones, because of these saftey reasons. :)
The front is only soft, because it has to be crumble zone. I bet if you drive old hilux there, it will get quite more smashed. And good feature is, now they are offering more locking differentials. In many ways, I think this new L200 is clearly better than the old.
offfiman 2 years ago
Thanks for the reply. I know about the crumpling zones in the front being softer for better inpact. Still am confused what to buy. Got a softness for Hilux's :) lol
Ayrton4everrr 2 years ago
Hilux aint bad either, I didnt mean that. :) Choose the one which you feel best for your use.
offfiman 2 years ago
Thanks man ;)
Ayrton4everrr 2 years ago
nice, i wish they made something solid like this for the US. i don't think they made one for the US because it's so damn.......ugly.
dude198player 3 years ago
se hace mierda xD
ieverlikesex 3 years ago
i like how it did
Unterseegrenadier 3 years ago
I've been in a crash like that.
indomitablefae 3 years ago
that dummy cant drive...He went straight for the wall... Drives like a Asian.
gerard12668 3 years ago 8
do u have problem with Asian?
tenjo10 3 years ago
No I don't have a problem with Asians I just don't like how they drive.....
gerard12668 3 years ago 2
Yes, you're right. Asians are crappy drivers. They are rich people and employ drivers. That's the reason why they cant drive like you do.
GME300 2 years ago
ouch
nasa186 3 years ago
glad we bought this truck than the isuzu rodeo
jedsebastian 3 years ago 2
hahah Mitsubishi must teach GM how to make a truck, a safe truck. (Isuzu = GMC)
mrbufon 2 years ago
nice tho !
XAerozX 3 years ago
sharausha busca bien y econtrarás el video de la nissan navara y dmax de isuzu, pero de la hilux no hay, no se atrevieron, aunque de verdad lo hubieran hecho, la clasificación de la prueba de choque de la l200 fue de 4 estrellas, la isuzu dmax con 2 estrellas y la navara q fue la peor de todas con 2 estrellas y una tachada, total, q la nissan navara es una porquería, Mitsubishi rules!
FBonillajr 3 years ago
Gracias, tienes toda la razón.
sharausha 3 years ago
Favor pongan el video de la toyota hilux o de la mazda bt-50 o nissan......, porque solo la mitsubishi tiene esta prueba. O es que las otras camionetas no se atreven?
sharausha 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
kiss the duck and call me santa. i won`t get one of those trucks. iam driving a dodge.
becky334 3 years ago
Mitsubishi here in US should've brought this real Mitsubishi pickup to North America, rather than that piece of shit Dodge Dakota-based Raider.
markiepolaris78 3 years ago 2
Yeah, here in Europe they have these L200s/Tritons, and i've been to the US and seen the Raiders and theyre horrible.
ViolentPear 3 years ago
We know that the Dodge Dakota here in US is a piece of crap truck, and because of that, it's always a hard sell for Dodge.....and Mitsubishi doesn't know that!
Since I love the Outlander, I'd like to ask this: is the Mitsu Outlander selling fairly in Europe alongside with its VW Tiguan & Land Rover Freelander competitors?
markiepolaris78 3 years ago 2
yeah mitsubbishi has been really stupid with their trucks in usa the raider is a peice of shit and who the hells idea was it to drp the montero and add the edavedor
spookypensreturns 3 years ago
it has a 2008 model well they sell it as the pajero not montero by me
firedemon101 3 years ago
yeah iknow but here they dont sell anymore the closest to here they sell them from is mexico
spookypensreturns 3 years ago
thats sad cuz the 2008 model is really nice
firedemon101 3 years ago
i know it sucks dam them
spookypensreturns 3 years ago
Endeavor's not bad, but dropping the Montero in US was ridiculous. The 3rd gen Montero's the last one we got, while overseas, the Montero (a.k.a. Pajero) is already on its 4th gen. For Australian market, the 4th gen's 3.8 V6 has been retuned to match the HP & torque of the 4.0 V6 of the Nissan Pathfinder.
markiepolaris78 3 years ago
i know and the new engin is good but the heavy mitsu should have a v8
spookypensreturns 3 years ago
haha, this vid has the same amount of stars as the l200 got from euroncap.
alexkvaskov 3 years ago
lol
firedemon101 3 years ago
Yeah, L200's are the best.
Mitsubishi own.
kr00s 3 years ago 2
My dad wanted a Navara, and so did I, but after the NCAP ratings, Im definitely going to advise him to go for the L200
s14asr20det 3 years ago 15
@s14asr20det go for the lancer ex :D
Akash1440 4 months ago
Yap, 4 stars. Its best pickup in Nissan Navaras and Toyota Hiluxes class. Best 4wd system, best engine and now its also most saftey.
offfiman 3 years ago 3
I own an L200 it has a good engine, transmission but the quality of all the others components are not so good :( ... anyway i like this car (pick-up)
ropoly 3 years ago
a lot better than nissan nivara
wyunaboy 3 years ago 7
Yep that car was worse than a Rover 100 i think judging by the score
573W1E6R1FF1N 3 years ago
yay i'm the 1st
classifires 3 years ago
And?
573W1E6R1FF1N 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
and u suck.
why cant u juz ignore me & watch the vid
YOU ASSHOLE
classifires 3 years ago
Because its a pointless comment
573W1E6R1FF1N 3 years ago 3
you should learn how to respect other people classifires.
If you like the triton good for you, just 1 question if you find this boring then y are you watching it?!?!
faz117 3 years ago
I allready did
573W1E6R1FF1N 3 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
yeah juz watch it & shut the fuck up bastard
i like the triton btw
classifires 3 years ago
Still and?
573W1E6R1FF1N 3 years ago 2
he is right ur a dip shit
acidicdeathlord 3 years ago