It is overhyped. It is not WYSIWYG!!!! It looks very impressive but this demo from 2004 still has better quality graphics than BulletStorm or GoW. Shaders (and shadows and ligting effects) in UE3 games are not so soft and smoothed out. My point is you will not see such quality graphics in real UE 3 games. UE 3 games in practice have worse looks than tech demos.
@VoxHouseStudio U know what I think about your idea? I think that your idea is just excellent!!! I will do it, and I hope you prove me wrong. I really want to be wrong!!!
@BugzzLightyear You say no because you clearly have no idea about game development or game engines AT ALL! Tech 5 is alot better than the unreal engine. Faster, easier to use and looks alot better.
@phopojijo Well then, he can't use it too much. Because I have used it a little and I have used all the previous engines they have made. So I find it pretty easy to use.
@UltimateBadass007 Yeah, it looks great but it was not optomized and so I am sure Epic could do something like that if they wanted, but as even the beginning of this video shows, they develop the engine so games can look good and run fast. If Cry Engine 2 was that good, they would not have dropped it when making Crysis 2. They went back to DX9 even just because they realized that as good as they made their game look, no one could play it.
I remember when I first saw this back in 2005(?) and I was just totally impressed with this. I thought that graphics could not get better. To add to that, I was a total graphics whore.
Now, present-day 2011, well... There's better-looking engines. Also, I'm not a graphics whore anymore.
At the moment Im creating a "Re-Make" of a older game that was created on the Unreal 1 (Unreal Tournament 99) I think, anyway its coming along nicely...
Im taking ALL the maps and creating ONE HUGE one... SO you can enjoy the entire game map as one whole, totally AWESOME... :)..
Serious Engine has the most easiest and advanced way of creating Geometry in any game... This is the largest plus over any other engine... PLUS if you change a Model its updated in the map directly or the other way to..
Which version of Serious Engine do you use? Made anything good?
Is it just me, or is this video a lie. I done remember seeing any physics that good in any UT3 engine games. And have found no way to play with them in the editor. If that was the case, a garrys mod type program for UT3 would be AMAZING. I havent seen anything that good....
because its used on console who knows what unreal engine could do if it were used to its full potential on a pc. And unreal engine 4 is coming out for the next gen of consoles god knows what that will be able to do
while that's true on many engines, unreal engine 3 is actually not hampered by consoles at all. Unlike other engines, it's incredibly easy to run, and so, the consoles run it at the fullest settings. (without AA of course). If you made it have so many high polygon assets or failed to optimize the engine to the point that it must be dumbed down for a console means that most people won't be able to even play it well anyway. On other engines I would agree though.
Um....what is that supposed to mean. "All unreal editor 3 engine look similar." What do you mean? Are you saying that all games (Bioshock, Gears of war 2, mirrors edge, section 8, rainbow 6 vegas) all look the same? Tell me what engine is impressive?
i see another person who really see differences in max possibility of engine and how its presented in the games, they've simply dosent look the same, maybe Gow.. but bioshock... nope. u know dynamic shadows didint look like in this video so u somehow right.i have same feeling.
No. This full potential thing doesn't even make sense. You see, it isn't about the settings or whatever, particles and shaders aren't exactly hard to implement. You're missing the point. It's usually the developers who must implement the engine WELL. Also, the shadows do kinda do that. But the vid just presented shadows in a way that looks impressive. Also, just wanting to put this out there, bioshock uses Unreal Engine 2.5, not 3. It's just very well modified.
Modern console is simply cannot handle graphics like that
Unless someone takes this engine and develop a PC exclusive game, like Crysis, we will never see the true power of Unreal Engine 3 in our PC being rendered real time.
U do realize that consoles are limited in terms of processing power, right. I've seen that game. nothing special that we've never seen in PC exclusive engine.
You can will processing power out of nothing. x360 is a PowerPC CPU with 48 unified shader architecture for its GPU. Modern graphic card have hundreds of parallel shaders
Gamespot has some graphic comparison, if you like to see some proof. But if you know the hardware spec of the x360, it pretty much speaks for itself
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Another TL;DR bunch of drivel from a PC game nut hugger.
Yes my PC is more powerful, it's a shame I had to fork out 10x as much cash as I did for the 360 to run games that don't like twice as good.
I'm a PC gamer, but I choose not to limit myself because I miss out on superb titles on the console. You, on the other hand, do limit yourself. So you lose.
I have a 600$ custom gaming computer than can run crysis on high (albeit not *very high), and I also have a 360. The only thing you need to do is wait and save up money between buying one and the other.
Why do you think that nobody is patient or has any money.
Just so you know, the 48 unified shaders are vector shaders, not scalar shaders. The Xenon GPU is basically an X1800 or whatever, just that the pipelines dedicated.
Otherwise, wow, Xenon can produce pretty damn good results for something as powerful as a low-end GPU.
UT2004 used Unreal Engine 2.5 i think. Another good engine is Source. For 2004, Source is the best Engine ever created, because it's the first to have HDR, and high quality texures. They scan people and they put theyre pictures on the model. Quite ingenious.
Yeah man, it's one of the "effects" of the engine. "UE3 can even simulate screen tearing for that 'we cram more frames than your system can handle onto the screen' look."
Haha, I remember that vid. dates back from 2004, but I'm still waiting to see half of those effects in UT3 or other games (like Displacement Mapping and Cast shadows/lightning)
it took my wahile to realize that after watching this, Gears and UT3 are running the engine at lower quality, which really sux. I think epic was using quad core pcs for this demo, i hope that the next gen consoles won't be running in these grahpics, i'm hoping better
It's not that they're using uber PC's. The demo was running on a 6800 (which really sucks now-days) and that the only thing powering it. The reason they were able to soop up the graphics so much was because of the scene complexity. Notice they're running these in very small simple rooms (mostly) with very few different materials. In GoW power had to be split up among everything (there's about 20 things the GPU does besides graphics) and here they could focus all the power on the visuals.
haloelite is right. Seeing posts like these really make me question peoples intelligence and the amount of research they do before they decide to talk crap about other games. At least get your facts right if your going to bash games.
i think he was talking about bioshock, which did use unreal engine 3, not all the games listed and it was pretty easy to figure out that he was only talking out bioshock, so i question your intelligence
Why does he say "Unreal Engines" then? Plus he listed the games instead of saying Crysis and CoD4 and mentioning Bioshock in another sentence. Either way it is not my faultI don't understand because the comment was poorly written.
@Jigsaw5999999999 ooh i guess i've misread alot of stuff lol all of infinity ward's call of duty games uses the ID tech 3 engine. i guess call of duty 4 uses a more updated and edited version of the engine.
@haloelite11215 Wrong. They use a heavily modified version of ID Tech 3. They used the original for Call of Duty 1, an upgraded version for CoD 2, then another for 4, etc.
@caferoflz but apparently wikipedia says Unreal Engine 3.0! So somebody is wrong here. I believe Wikipedia is. Many sources say 2.5 and to me it looks like 2.5. Unreal 3 has completely differently lighting to begin with. I go for 2.5 for Bioshock.
@duckotaco Ah, well I guess I'm wrong then. I guess it makes sense that it would be UE 2.5, just based on the time frame it was released; however, it does seem heavily modified compared to the other games that used it.
@duckotaco This is taken from that same page: “Today, our version of Unreal Engine is its own animal… it’s branched out into a lot of different, very custom things that our teams have layered on top of that base.”
So yeah, not sure why we both put effort into figuring that out... but it turns out that it is a heavily customized version UE 2.5
no those sewer monsters were re created to be the wretches in gears, notice the similar characteristics of looks, structure, and movement of the sewer characters.
I'm not kidding you, the guys at Epic Games have said so themselves. Actually, they said it was a 3rd party that made that possible. Havok has been used on the Wii too.
thats because you don't have an HDTV, on the 720p it looks even better. and how you can compare youtube crappy flash video quality with real hd image ????
Well i don't agree with that assumption considering this was an early tech demo of the unreal 3 engine and not part of the game. Even if all this actualy was part of the game(which I doubt), I'd bet not everything in this demo is relevant to the gears of war series as of now.
A PC exclusive Unreal Engine 3 where they could unleash and show off what the engine is capable of would be very intresting.
CaptainRidley 2 weeks ago
Still awesome for todays graphics!
beatdathaguy98 2 months ago
wow 2004, i thought it was finished in 2005, til.
ut2k4wikichici 4 months ago
does the copyright say 2001?
ave383 4 months ago
@ave383 2004, not 2001
AnimalMotherFTW2 3 months ago
It is overhyped. It is not WYSIWYG!!!! It looks very impressive but this demo from 2004 still has better quality graphics than BulletStorm or GoW. Shaders (and shadows and ligting effects) in UE3 games are not so soft and smoothed out. My point is you will not see such quality graphics in real UE 3 games. UE 3 games in practice have worse looks than tech demos.
SOKOLEK 5 months ago
@SOKOLEK uh perhaps you should try a recent release of UDK if you think that.
VoxHouseStudio 5 months ago
@VoxHouseStudio U know what I think about your idea? I think that your idea is just excellent!!! I will do it, and I hope you prove me wrong. I really want to be wrong!!!
SOKOLEK 5 months ago
All these assets are from Gears of War, aren't they?
iLikeTheUDK 6 months ago
@iLikeTheUDK They probably planned ahead - this demo was made 2 years before Gears 1 was released on Xbox (and 3 years before PC release of Gears 1)
MouthofSaurons 2 months ago
I wonder what Unreal Engine 4 will look like.
Megollyen1 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
thumbs up if you are leaning on your left arm
Kebabmies1001 8 months ago
And a Brumak
KartKing4ever 8 months ago
4:40 LOCUST!!! Hahaha
KartKing4ever 8 months ago
@BugzzLightyear You say no because you clearly have no idea about game development or game engines AT ALL! Tech 5 is alot better than the unreal engine. Faster, easier to use and looks alot better.
oBLACKIECHANoo 8 months ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo And where have you used iD Tech 5? Because your testimonial on ease-of-use differs from Carmack's... and he made it.
phopojijo 5 months ago
@phopojijo Well then, he can't use it too much. Because I have used it a little and I have used all the previous engines they have made. So I find it pretty easy to use.
oBLACKIECHANoo 5 months ago
@oBLACKIECHANoo
easier to use? When the fuck did you get your hands on it?
xalener 5 months ago
my favorite engine
grandMasterbzkzklx 8 months ago
@UltimateBadass007 Yeah, it looks great but it was not optomized and so I am sure Epic could do something like that if they wanted, but as even the beginning of this video shows, they develop the engine so games can look good and run fast. If Cry Engine 2 was that good, they would not have dropped it when making Crysis 2. They went back to DX9 even just because they realized that as good as they made their game look, no one could play it.
hbk92701 8 months ago
tech5 > unreal engine....
oBLACKIECHANoo 9 months ago
@UltimateBadass007 it's not as fast...
QUATR00 10 months ago
Best UE3 video, with a excellent mystic music and nice environment !
Anyone now what is the music at the beginning ?
Ossinerith 11 months ago
I remember seeing this SO long ago, I thought it was mind blowing at the time. Which I guess it was.
fooblepie 11 months ago
I remember when I first saw this back in 2005(?) and I was just totally impressed with this. I thought that graphics could not get better. To add to that, I was a total graphics whore.
Now, present-day 2011, well... There's better-looking engines. Also, I'm not a graphics whore anymore.
Oh, how the times have changed..
WiredTissue 1 year ago
I remember how impressed I was by this back in 2004. Six years in, not a single UE3 game actually uses any of this. Damn you, Xbox 360.
MentalSentinel 1 year ago
Can i ask how you implant a Rag doll effect on a static mesh?
DannyWinterPortfolio 1 year ago
What is the music at the beginning please ?
Ossinerith 1 year ago
They shown in 2004 graphics that are available only in 2007, why can't they do the same thing now? SHOW ME 2013 GRAPHICS!!!
gevelegian 1 year ago
RAGDOLL is a disgusting thing
tumeg24 1 year ago
Where I can find this tech demonstration in high quality ??
I working on a map to simulate this presentation. :P
braveale 1 year ago
alguien kiere pene
ramms2 1 year ago
the environments on the first part of the demo is actually from gears of war but they have the different color scheme
those wretches and brumak have already existed since this demo
its like the viewers at this time are already seeing the upcoming game which would still be released in 2006
this demo is actually a preview of gears of war way back in 2004
lattelover16 1 year ago
At the moment Im creating a "Re-Make" of a older game that was created on the Unreal 1 (Unreal Tournament 99) I think, anyway its coming along nicely...
Im taking ALL the maps and creating ONE HUGE one... SO you can enjoy the entire game map as one whole, totally AWESOME... :)..
Serious Engine has the most easiest and advanced way of creating Geometry in any game... This is the largest plus over any other engine... PLUS if you change a Model its updated in the map directly or the other way to..
NecroViolator 2 years ago
SOURCE ENGINE FTW WTG! (its old but i love)
or the one by ID
Jadon159 2 years ago
I like Serious Engine a little better...
Its easier to build awesome Geometry with, for me that is... :)...
Also, it "mirrors" all Meshes/Models ingame so you dont take up any memory...
Tried this Map Editor before its to much shitty things to do just to get something working...
Great for Epic but not for me...
NecroViolator 2 years ago
Which version of Serious Engine do you use? Made anything good?
Is it just me, or is this video a lie. I done remember seeing any physics that good in any UT3 engine games. And have found no way to play with them in the editor. If that was the case, a garrys mod type program for UT3 would be AMAZING. I havent seen anything that good....
BuckFastZombie 2 years ago
that looks realy nice but Cryengine is way better
qTristanp 2 years ago
because its used on console who knows what unreal engine could do if it were used to its full potential on a pc. And unreal engine 4 is coming out for the next gen of consoles god knows what that will be able to do
ViolentBiscuits 2 years ago
@ViolentBiscuits
while that's true on many engines, unreal engine 3 is actually not hampered by consoles at all. Unlike other engines, it's incredibly easy to run, and so, the consoles run it at the fullest settings. (without AA of course). If you made it have so many high polygon assets or failed to optimize the engine to the point that it must be dumbed down for a console means that most people won't be able to even play it well anyway. On other engines I would agree though.
rolln2013 1 year ago
its true idk why you got a disagree
THEYELLABOI44 2 years ago
Normal Mapping is soooo cool.
TomahawxX 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
nice marketing video. Unfortunately in reality all UE3 engine look similar and not so impressive...
compare2 2 years ago
Um....what is that supposed to mean. "All unreal editor 3 engine look similar." What do you mean? Are you saying that all games (Bioshock, Gears of war 2, mirrors edge, section 8, rainbow 6 vegas) all look the same? Tell me what engine is impressive?
TruthThroughSarcasm 2 years ago
i see another person who really see differences in max possibility of engine and how its presented in the games, they've simply dosent look the same, maybe Gow.. but bioshock... nope. u know dynamic shadows didint look like in this video so u somehow right.i have same feeling.
3iHard 2 years ago
@3iHard
No. This full potential thing doesn't even make sense. You see, it isn't about the settings or whatever, particles and shaders aren't exactly hard to implement. You're missing the point. It's usually the developers who must implement the engine WELL. Also, the shadows do kinda do that. But the vid just presented shadows in a way that looks impressive. Also, just wanting to put this out there, bioshock uses Unreal Engine 2.5, not 3. It's just very well modified.
rolln2013 1 year ago
@rolln2013
bioshock2 uses unreal engine3
Capeau 1 year ago
@Capeau
no it doesnt. it has some unreal engine 3 code in it, but it's mostly unreal engine 2.5. look it up.
rolln2013 1 year ago
@rolln2013
thats the most ridiculous thing i've ever read..
it uses some ue3 code but is mostly ue 2.5?! loll
Capeau 1 year ago
@Capeau
games (dot) vainsoftgames(dot)com/?gameID=15
check this article at the "game engine" section. you honestly don't know what you're talking about. that happens all the time.
did you know, for example, the goldsrc engine used the modified quake 1 engine with partial id tech 2 integration? look that up too dumbass.
rolln2013 1 year ago
@rolln2013
i know what im talking about as i worked for different game developers and with many game engines, but thanks for the compliment kid.
Capeau 1 year ago
@Capeau
Ok. My bad, king of game engines. Let your humble domain reach far and wide.
rolln2013 1 year ago
@rolln2013
ok, you may go now. ^^
Capeau 1 year ago
Even today, Unreal Engine 3 is amazing. I think a lot should use this engine and pimp it out beyond the max! It's still good to use
SonicAnnihilator 2 years ago
what game will take this engine?
sikvel 2 years ago
Many games use the Unreal 3 Engine. Hardly any games use it to its potential.
Digitalstorm007 2 years ago 37
@Digitalstorm007 Mostly because crappy consoles limit the game graphics to their crappy video cards :(
gevelegian 1 year ago
where can you get this?
fable2fan2 2 years ago
1 word: DAAAAAAMN!
ZeroStealth117 2 years ago
I just cant belive they showed us all those cool shadow effects but still NO game i repeat NO game have them to this day.
tehkill3r 2 years ago
true... and If you have Unreal Tournament 3 game look to acid on deck or on any armor- on all speculars you can see antalus map from UT2k3:p
marusadamczyk 2 years ago
i remember sawing this in 2004... I was stunned
TerraP 2 years ago
wow they had the locust desgin in 2004 wow
ViolentBiscuits 2 years ago
Gears of War was being planned since 2004, so it does make sense that they already had the locust design done already.
iD0NUTZ 2 years ago
Amazing. I love the physics in UE3.
Muratarh 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
this is realy boring
OoIxZiiMeRxIoO 2 years ago
unreal engine FTW!!! :D
thechris14267 2 years ago 15
Alot of this tech is about 5 years old and first used in the source engine
WeEatBrainz 2 years ago 2
oh yeah true that
philgunman 2 years ago
Yea they could probably make this twice as realistic now
ViolentBiscuits 2 years ago
So they did this demo back in 2004... so in 2009 they can probably make a demo like this for the unreal engine 4 :D PLEAASE i'm so curious!
gevelegian 2 years ago
Lol appears like that dragon was originally intended to be in gears of war
koolaidmanOHYEAHHH 2 years ago
Yeah :)
I wouldn't be surprised if it was a scrapped design for Skorge's mount or something like that.
ARGHWUT 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
lol, no games have these effects..fail
freeweed 2 years ago
the engine supports all these effects just not used by the mappers yet.
bigmonkeyman44 2 years ago
*drools** omg!!!
charm11769 2 years ago
Comment removed
charm11769 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
☻/
/▌
/ \
This is bob, Copy and paste him, and soon he will take over Youtube
Jammage1 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
☻/
/▌
/ \
This is bob, Copy and paste him, and soon he will take over Youtube
Jammage1 2 years ago
God dammit I wish I had their SDK.
MGNabomb 2 years ago
can any one beleive that this was made in late 2004
this is an amazing graphics difference between this tech demo and ut2004
they were made in the same year
i wish they used this for ut2004
123MATTYABC 2 years ago
develeping an engine takes years!
Tim Sweeney (technical director of epic) is working with few engeeners on unreal engine 4 since 2008, and it should be ready between 2012 and 2018.
so when UT2004 was released (UEngine 2.5 fyi), UEngine 3 was already in progress.
PoRRasturvaT 2 years ago
I agree. I wish they would release this tech demo, it looked amazing back in '04, and still does today.
I especially like the lantern part of the video, (Where it's in the fridge room).
tarkata14 2 years ago
it's been a long time!
XHXDX 2 years ago
4:13 a geras of war drone
bernaldc 2 years ago
the dragon at 4:49, is it the monster cliff b was talking about that made the brumak look like a panda bear? please respond
Slipknot7xx 2 years ago
hellgate london should use unreal engine 3 :P
European1123 3 years ago
I hope Cod6 uses this.
emuman4evr 3 years ago
Modern console is simply cannot handle graphics like that
Unless someone takes this engine and develop a PC exclusive game, like Crysis, we will never see the true power of Unreal Engine 3 in our PC being rendered real time.
Hornet85 3 years ago 2
Play gears of war 2 on the xbox 360, and you'll eat those words.
Zer0nite 3 years ago
U do realize that consoles are limited in terms of processing power, right. I've seen that game. nothing special that we've never seen in PC exclusive engine.
You can will processing power out of nothing. x360 is a PowerPC CPU with 48 unified shader architecture for its GPU. Modern graphic card have hundreds of parallel shaders
Gamespot has some graphic comparison, if you like to see some proof. But if you know the hardware spec of the x360, it pretty much speaks for itself
Hornet85 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Another TL;DR bunch of drivel from a PC game nut hugger.
Yes my PC is more powerful, it's a shame I had to fork out 10x as much cash as I did for the 360 to run games that don't like twice as good.
I'm a PC gamer, but I choose not to limit myself because I miss out on superb titles on the console. You, on the other hand, do limit yourself. So you lose.
Zer0nite 3 years ago
I have a 600$ custom gaming computer than can run crysis on high (albeit not *very high), and I also have a 360. The only thing you need to do is wait and save up money between buying one and the other.
Why do you think that nobody is patient or has any money.
MGNabomb 2 years ago
Just so you know, the 48 unified shaders are vector shaders, not scalar shaders. The Xenon GPU is basically an X1800 or whatever, just that the pipelines dedicated.
Otherwise, wow, Xenon can produce pretty damn good results for something as powerful as a low-end GPU.
xenol 2 years ago
doesnt look half as good for real, geez
utjonny10 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
surprised cliffy's faggot ass aint in this lmao.. man i hate the guy.
TheTexanAtheist 3 years ago
Wath is the first music please ?
Ossinerith 3 years ago
and they should have kept these characters and the gun there using to move things around
123MATTYABC 3 years ago
tell me was this before ut2004 or after because the graphics are quite amazing for 2004
123MATTYABC 3 years ago
UT2004 used Unreal Engine 2.5 i think. Another good engine is Source. For 2004, Source is the best Engine ever created, because it's the first to have HDR, and high quality texures. They scan people and they put theyre pictures on the model. Quite ingenious.
L1GH7N1NG 3 years ago
I think you mean Unreal Championship 2.
Unreal19920304 3 years ago
ut is engine 2.0.......... the only game i know that use 2.5 is red orchestra
erikouwehand 3 years ago
is the "tearing of the screen" part of the engine or is it there becuase of the movie quality?
Cambesa 3 years ago
Yeah man, it's one of the "effects" of the engine. "UE3 can even simulate screen tearing for that 'we cram more frames than your system can handle onto the screen' look."
VoxHouseStudio 2 years ago
Haha, I remember that vid. dates back from 2004, but I'm still waiting to see half of those effects in UT3 or other games (like Displacement Mapping and Cast shadows/lightning)
BlueScreenJunky 3 years ago
it took my wahile to realize that after watching this, Gears and UT3 are running the engine at lower quality, which really sux. I think epic was using quad core pcs for this demo, i hope that the next gen consoles won't be running in these grahpics, i'm hoping better
IFDonutzCanFly 3 years ago
It's not that they're using uber PC's. The demo was running on a 6800 (which really sucks now-days) and that the only thing powering it. The reason they were able to soop up the graphics so much was because of the scene complexity. Notice they're running these in very small simple rooms (mostly) with very few different materials. In GoW power had to be split up among everything (there's about 20 things the GPU does besides graphics) and here they could focus all the power on the visuals.
TheKrust477 3 years ago
those r GOW character.. That a giant freak cannon creature.. Gears Of War use this character.. Or is that character belong to UT game??
DeafBlueDragon 3 years ago
FRAUD! XD
Leadwerks 3 years ago
It would be a bitch trying to run game with unreal engine on my computer.. :o
That's why i prefer X360.
Zeerohaka 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Unreal Engines are the best! Crysis, COD 4, Bioshock (Well Unreal Engne used but designers sucked) those all suck compared to unreal Tournament 3.
ShitAndLobster 3 years ago
cod 4 didn't use unreal engine it used the Proprietary engine, bioshock uses unreal engine 3, crysis uses cry engine 2. :P
haloelite11215 3 years ago 5
haloelite is right. Seeing posts like these really make me question peoples intelligence and the amount of research they do before they decide to talk crap about other games. At least get your facts right if your going to bash games.
AlbertWesker0047 3 years ago 2
i think he was talking about bioshock, which did use unreal engine 3, not all the games listed and it was pretty easy to figure out that he was only talking out bioshock, so i question your intelligence
ApachiMaru 3 years ago
Why does he say "Unreal Engines" then? Plus he listed the games instead of saying Crysis and CoD4 and mentioning Bioshock in another sentence. Either way it is not my faultI don't understand because the comment was poorly written.
AlbertWesker0047 3 years ago
@haloelite11215 Call of duty 4 use the ID tech 4 ( Doom 3 , quake wars , wolfenstein etc... )
Jigsaw5999999999 1 year ago
@Jigsaw5999999999 call of duty runs on the IW engine which is a proprietary engine. :P
haloelite11215 1 year ago
@haloelite11215 in the credits its "ID software technology" is not id tech 4 ? but another graphics engine bilb by id software for call of duty 4 ?
Jigsaw5999999999 1 year ago
@Jigsaw5999999999 ooh i guess i've misread alot of stuff lol all of infinity ward's call of duty games uses the ID tech 3 engine. i guess call of duty 4 uses a more updated and edited version of the engine.
haloelite11215 1 year ago
@haloelite11215 noooo the quake 3 engine ?
Jigsaw5999999999 1 year ago
@Jigsaw5999999999 Quake 3 used Unreal Engine 1, amirite?
Zestava 1 year ago
@Zestava no quake 3 its the ID tech 3
Jigsaw5999999999 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@haloelite11215 in the credits its "ID software technology" is not id tech 4 ? but another graphics engine build by id software for call of duty 4 ?
Jigsaw5999999999 1 year ago
@haloelite11215 Wrong. They use a heavily modified version of ID Tech 3. They used the original for Call of Duty 1, an upgraded version for CoD 2, then another for 4, etc.
l33tpete 1 year ago
@haloelite11215 Bioshock uses Unreal Engine 2.5, not 3.
duckotaco 1 year ago
@duckotaco ugh this is so confusing lol
haloelite11215 1 year ago
@duckotaco No, I'm pretty sure it uses unreal engine 3. Unreal Tournament 2004 used UE 2.5
caferoflz 10 months ago
@caferoflz wrong, search "bioshock unreal engine 2.5" on google
duckotaco 10 months ago
@caferoflz but apparently wikipedia says Unreal Engine 3.0! So somebody is wrong here. I believe Wikipedia is. Many sources say 2.5 and to me it looks like 2.5. Unreal 3 has completely differently lighting to begin with. I go for 2.5 for Bioshock.
duckotaco 10 months ago
@caferoflz the official UnrealEngine site confirms once and for all that Bioshock 2 used the 2.5 engine and not 3. Sorry! =)
duckotaco 10 months ago
@duckotaco Ah, well I guess I'm wrong then. I guess it makes sense that it would be UE 2.5, just based on the time frame it was released; however, it does seem heavily modified compared to the other games that used it.
caferoflz 10 months ago
@duckotaco This is taken from that same page: “Today, our version of Unreal Engine is its own animal… it’s branched out into a lot of different, very custom things that our teams have layered on top of that base.”
So yeah, not sure why we both put effort into figuring that out... but it turns out that it is a heavily customized version UE 2.5
caferoflz 10 months ago
@caferoflz Becuse we want to know
duckotaco 10 months ago
lol man i remember watching this in freshman year and thinking that this is the best that graphics will ever get. then came crysis.
xSubliminaLx 3 years ago
those r resistance 2 creatures sicccccckkkkkk
i saw them on the resistance screens
killbillvtwo 3 years ago
Dude-gears of war
FLAMESPARTAN363 3 years ago
I Wish Those Sewer monsters would be in Gears of War!
djjunky94 3 years ago
no those sewer monsters were re created to be the wretches in gears, notice the similar characteristics of looks, structure, and movement of the sewer characters.
CrystalCronix 3 years ago
yes, but I mean these sewer monster look (to my opinion) much more scary.
djjunky94 3 years ago
man,i wish i knew more about these engines and stuff,btw,kewl stuff on the vid :P
xCyberxCrusaderx 3 years ago
wow, that big red thing looks like a glowing dildo
spunkeez 3 years ago
Lol wtf man
FLAMESPARTAN363 3 years ago
damn i wish unreal engine was a game lol
ants909 3 years ago
games are made with that -_-
porygonvs2 3 years ago
i no im not a n00b like u. >=D
ants909 3 years ago 2
Me too.
Extnoob 3 years ago
Me too.
Extnoob 3 years ago
Well it will sooner or later
not like that but you know, it will be used by a game ;)
lunei66 3 years ago
locust dragon?
spunkeez 3 years ago
I've seen this video tons of times, yet I am utterly amazed at it everytime. This engine owns all other commercial engines.
tarkata14 4 years ago
so freaking awesome they're using this for MK8
RobSaysNo 4 years ago
you no garrys mod? they should make an unreal version of thet. that would be so much better.
sniper11235 4 years ago
simply awesome how far the progression of game technology has gotten
indymind89 4 years ago
Why cant graphics be made with a bending surface, like f(x,y) = Cos^2(x) - Sin^2(y)
and requite polygons? Anyone know?
ProxySpam 4 years ago
what do you mean exactly?
indymind89 4 years ago 2
Like making a perfect sphere and putting a texture on it without making the sphere out of polys.
ProxySpam 4 years ago 2
just add a sphere object in a 3D programm like blender. no need to build it up out of polys
indymind89 4 years ago
Because it won't be possibble to make it in 3D ,there are Nurbs and Sub-Divisions but they are only a mathematical way to make polygons !
CodeVeroby 4 years ago
i think the geometry of plane polygons is the easiest to compute but a 3D plot would require much more power let alone the rendering.
indymind89 4 years ago
omg! people will be crazy with this level of realistic thing...
raulpoli 4 years ago
Wii can actually run this engine. Along with Havok.
levdog3 4 years ago
Keep dreaming
TheRKiller 4 years ago
I'm not kidding you, the guys at Epic Games have said so themselves. Actually, they said it was a 3rd party that made that possible. Havok has been used on the Wii too.
levdog3 4 years ago
Cry Engine 2 looks better
alimetin12 4 years ago
nope
bigmonkeyman44 4 years ago
cry ia good for first person shoter but overall unreal
zishan6 4 years ago
Own it??
Hell no it will deliver it on silver platter, than gawk at the awful goo and then poke and laugh at that shit!!
Shadowcaster787 4 years ago
Yes it does, stop shitting in your pants it comes out next week. By the way this is a tech demo of unreal engine 3, not Unreal 3 dumbass.
Shadowcaster787 4 years ago 2
cant wait till unreal tournament 2007 comes out
jpaul1985 4 years ago
lol ur a drug head
bunuptoast 4 years ago
Total bullsh*t marketing hype. UT3 looks nothing like this.
RonPaulPwnz 4 years ago
Locust in the disco!
Mlink187 4 years ago
americas army 3.0 gonna be made on ue3 aswell. hooah!
Insurgent979 4 years ago
yep. can't wait. except that aa3 is gonna restart our honor... :(
wtf? everything is made from a high res and low res version and then they are shoved together.
buttersownsuall 4 years ago
OWED by CRYENGINE 2.....
vegnagunL 4 years ago
Both engines are supreme, yes, but they're both failures next to some other engines that could have been great but nobody did much with them.
DoctorAwesome 4 years ago
thats because you don't have an HDTV, on the 720p it looks even better. and how you can compare youtube crappy flash video quality with real hd image ????
chegis 4 years ago
This engine will be used on a lot of games
anarchyfps 4 years ago
its so obvious that dragon thing is gonna be in gow 2
bistoha2 4 years ago
Well i don't agree with that assumption considering this was an early tech demo of the unreal 3 engine and not part of the game. Even if all this actualy was part of the game(which I doubt), I'd bet not everything in this demo is relevant to the gears of war series as of now.
Mavidyoute14 4 years ago