the jewish supremacists have great determination to supplant real history with lies. The many make-believe jewish patriarchs were invented to supplant historic Egyptians such as Amenemhet (Abraham), Thutmose (Moses) and Imhotep (Joseph). "Exodus" was invented to supplant the Code of Hammurabi with the Ten Commandments. "Holocaust" lies were promulgated to supplant the real mass murders of the Native Americans, West African slaves, Congolese, Armenians, Ukrainians, Poles, Japanese and Germans.
Melanin responsible for skin pigmentation, is insoluble & is preserved for millions of years in Mummies skins. Although the epidermis is the main site of the melanin, the melanocytes
penetrating the derm at the boundary between it and the epidermis, even where
the latter has mostly been destroyed by the embalming materials, show a melanin
level which is non-existent in the white-skinned races.
thus classifying the ancient Egyptians unquestionably among the black races.
the sphinx is not looking like brittany spears, it is looking like typical black African man.. would an acient people build such a monument of size so far back in honour of a slave or its "non- identified people? really? lolol I love being black
Shalom - how about we as a people rise from all corners of the globe (blackman & woman) to take back whats rightfully ours (africa) - we need to demand for our own Political Government, schools, jobs, Army, Laws, Churches, Kings & queens & ect .... with the help of every participant this could be done in an orderly fashion - shalom i salam salakem (allthingsnew) 2012
She puts forth the theory that because whites are the descendants of African Albino's and were rejected because of their genetic mutation, that this rejection is part of their core psychological being.
In essence she is saying that racism specifically against Blacks is deeper than economics and religion, it's in their psychological make up.
They raped our people, our land, our history, and our identity...lets take back what is ours black people. These mutated devil CAUCAUS MOUNTAINEER CRACKKKERS time is up...these imposters are not chosen people of God, they were mere accident of freak science. God gave us the SUN, and ancient Egyptians worshipped the SUN but the CRACKKKERS hide from the SUN. It's cancer to their survival. They are completely different from the entire human race...fraud and cursed creatures without origin.
Phoenician7: You give new meaning to the saying "Dumber than a doorknob". Hard to swallow that you're from the ancient African Albino eh? Get over it. I'm sure you're accustomed to doing alot of swallowing.
• Mekota & Vermehren (2005) analyzed soft tissue from several New Kingdom Egyptian mummies, and found that the basal epithelial cells in the mummies’ skin were “packed with melanin as expected for specimens of Negroid origin.”
• Mekota & Vermehren (2005) analyzed soft tissue from several New Kingdom Egyptian mummies, and found that the basal epithelial cells in the mummies’ skin were “packed with melanin as expected for specimens of Negroid origin.”
The mummy of Hatshepsut"s father, Thutmoses the 1st, once had coarse wooly hair. There is a published photo of it in a 1930s book To see that and more pictorial evidence on blacks in Ancient Egyypt. Look at "Black Ancient Egypt; Truth Behind the Stoon SEE MY UPLOADS for more ne part 1-2
. Now, these texts do not speak about the aridity, desert conditions in the region, the change and the shift in the water regime and drying of the Sarasvati river. The fact is that these compositors knew only the mighty and the mature river. Secondly, this also shows that there is very little or no time gap between composition of the Mandal 2nd ,6th and 7th and original text of the Yajur Veda.
This description of the Yajur Veda is supported by occurrence of more than one channels in Rajasthan and the deltas in the Sindh, South - west of the Rajasthan and in the Great Rann of Kachchh ( Malik et al.1999; 163 - 174, also see the figures). This also confirms the statement of the Reg Veda that Sarasvati was Saptathi meaning the Sarasvati had five disbutaries and two tributaries of the Satudri and Drashadvati.
This clearly shows that like other mighty, mature rivers, in the flood plain of the Rajasthan, the Sarasvati eroded five channels through the horizontal erosions of the frequent floods of the very high magnitudes and used to flow through these five channels.
. This Rig Vedic descriptions thus clearly show that during the early Rig Vedic period, the Sarasvati was the most superior, the mightiest, mature and the most important river of this part of the continent. In the time of Yajur Veda, which seems to be a recomposition of the Reg Veda Mandal - 6, .the Sarasvati enjoyed the same status and the might. The details of the channels are recorded in the Vaj Sanehi Samhita of the Shukla yajur Veda
. The river had very amount of the flood discharge which must have cut the meanders and the disbutaries. During the floodings the river was roaring. The frequent floods used to spread over the vast areas recharging the lakes and bringing abundant water, silt and fertility and food and prosperity to all. That is why Sarasvati was praised by the Rsis.
.The river was very rich in the lakes, the channels and the silts. However, when the Sarasvati was in spates of the high magnitudes and of the long duration it used to become fierce, uncontrollable and destructive. During the floodings, its current was extremely swift and fast having very high velocity which naturally generated and released high degree of the energy.
In the flood plain the Sarasvati had the seven channel an it was the mightiest among all the rivers. When not in spate its glacial fed water was pure and white and the channel had golden sand.
. Now, in the Rajasthan, several lakes and playas having riverine origin have been reported ( Rammurthy. 1999:158), this strengthens the very meaning and the name of the Sarasvati and also the Rig Vedic description of the river. So, from the Rig Veda following picture of the Sarasvati emerges out. That the Rig Vedic Sarasvati had its origin in the Himalaya and it used to fall into the sea.
Secondly, the very name of the Sarasvati denotes the river of having many lakes. Reg Veda refers many lakes. Among these, the Sharyanaavaan and the Dronkalash are the examples.
One, the Sarasvati was the mother of all the rivers, the disbutaries. Second, the river was abundance in water to feed - fill the ocean like a mother feeding her child. The Sarasvati being the mightiest river must have brought such a large volume of the water into the sea, the present Ranns of Kachch, the then sea, showing her might ever the sea. This statement of the Reg Veda is supported by the numerous deltas and the bets in the Great Rann of Kachchh. ( Malik et. al 1999 : 163-174).
The Rig Veda describes the Sarasvati as Saptathi and Sindhumaataa Aam Yat Saakam Yashaso Vavashaataa Sarasvati Saptathi Sindhumaataa (RV 7:36:6) This indicates including the Sarasvati, There were seven rivers.
It says that the Sarasvati was superior to all the other rivers, best of the mother rivers as the Sarasvati was the main source of the prosperity and survival and was the life line of the inhabitants residing over there on the flood plain. The Sarasvati was also best of the goddesses as it used to bring prosperity in tremendous. The text describes its flow white in complexion indicating it was a glacial fed river.
This comparison of the Sindhu with the Sarasvati also clearly shows that the how mightier Sarasvati could be when the shatudri - present Sutlej was its tributary and how moderate the Sindhu could be without Shatudri - Present Sutlej ! Secondly, this overflowed water of the Sarasvati used to bring tremendous water and fertile silt for agriculture and faunal and floral wealth.
This behavior of the river Sindhu is recorded right from the ptolemy, the Greek auther of the Medieval writers. The records indicate that when in spate the Sindhu erodes new channels, meanders and suddenly shifts its water into the newly cut channels, recharges these lakes and the abandons channels and swings towards the west as the flood plain slopes towards the south- west.
However, in the flood of the high magnitude, the velocity in Sindh is about 12 km. per hour and the flood discharge increases to 27000 cms to 28000 cms. per second".
When the river was on its peaks of the floods, the velocity of the flood discharge at the up treamwas 8 km. per hour and the flood discharge was about 250 cms. to 800 cms. per second. But downstream the confluence, the river Sindhu becomes mightier and larger and the Sindh where the gradient is very low the width of the river channel varies from one km. to one and half km. and during the flood of the high magnitude the width of the channel increases to two kms
Now to know the might of the Sarasvati over all the other rivers here, it is essential to know the Sindhu Flood mechanism as it has also a long history of the floodings. The Imperial Gezeteer notes ( Enthovon 1909:164-65,167-168). "Before taming, upstream to the confluence with the five river including the Satlej, the ancient Satudri, the width of the Sindhu is about half a Km.
The flood water was also overflowing both the banks and the flood waters filled or say inundated the earth, that is the vast urea of the flood plain and the heaven that is the Himalayan region.
The Rig Veda also informs us that when the Sarasvati was in spate the river was becoming uncontrollable and its current was the swiftest of the swifts. It further says that the velocity of the Sarasvati was so high that it broke the hill ranges and the river carried them ( as the flood load) down like lotus stems - see below:
Rig Veda clearly describes the origin of the Sarasvati, its whole course, the nature and the behavior and its flood mechanism. It also describes its role in shaping of the life of the people residing in the flood plain. Maximum number of the references on the Sarasvati river come from the Mandala 2nd, 6th and 7th of the early text (Singh, Shivaji. 1998 : 29-33). Rig Veda clearly mentions that the Sarasvati had its origin in the Himalaya and not in the Siwalik Hills
. At the first glance, the hymns are seemed to be the prayers. But in the analytic eyes, they reveal valuable historical information of the palaeaoclimate, the types of rains, the waters in the mountains and also on the earth, the clouds and their formations, the draughts, the river beds, the floods and the river, the floodings and the waters, digging or eroding of the new channels, the takes and so on. (Griffith; 1889; Shri Swami.1972
Here,so much reliable information given from various sources of different nature,but everyone confirms the details of the other!No contradiction at all!
Most of the cities of the Saraswati and Indus valley followed these principles exactly. Since these cities were constructed as early as 6,500 to 7,000 BC, this would suggest that Sthapatya Veda may have been known as early as that. This gives another reason to put the origins of Rig Vedic tradition even before that time. This is another bit of evidence, which is not noted in previous literature, that may establish the great antiquity of the Rig Vedic tradition.
The ancient architectural system of Sthapatya Veda prescribes detailed principles of construction of homes and cities. One of the main principles of Sthapatya Veda is that cities be laid out on an exact north-south grid, with all houses facing due east. Another is that the buildings be oriented to the east with a slope to the east and any body of water on the east.
The medieval Kashmiri historian Kalhana claimed that the previous cycle had started in 3076 BC, and the present one in AD 525. J.E. Mitchiner has suggested that the beginning of the Saptarshi reckoning was one more cycle earlier, in 6676 BC: "We may conclude that the older and original version of the Era of the Seven Rsis commenced with the Seven Rsis in Krttika in 6676 BC, used a total of 28 Naksatras, and placed the start of the Kali Yuga in 3102 BC
The Puranic king-list as known to Greek visitors of Chandragupta court in the 4th century BC or to later Greco-Roman India-watchers, started in 6776 BC.Pliny wrote that the Indians date their first king, "Liber Pater", to "6,451 years and 3 months" before Alexander the Great (d. 323 BC),while Arrian puts the dynastic list at 6,042 + 300 + 120 = 6,462 years before Sandrokottos (Chandragupta), to whom a Greek embassy sent in 314 BC.Both indications add up to a date, give or take a year, of 6776 BC
Anybody interested to know the antiquity of Vedic city of Dwaraka, other details on its scientific dating and photos of underground city may visit the above site. Just put (.)where I have written as dot and before com.Dont copy and paste.You wont get the site.
The conclusion through Saraswathi river on Vedic age conformed by another gulf of cambay underwater excavation.One more proof is from harappan site of Dholavira, where many skeketons were excavated.Vedic altars also got.Artifacts found were sent to scientific dating gave value of 7000bc.One after other conforming Vedic time scale.
Another very powerful proof of Vedic age is given by Lord Krishnas Dwarka underwater excavation done in 2002.One can see online all submerged cities,fort etc and details.All forts and cities submerged were found which exactly as per Mahabharata version.Many artifiacts were found.Two drilled wood pieces were sent for scientific dating to two places in Europe.One gave value of 5500 BC and another is 7500 years.But 7500 BC is more stronger as per experts.Which conforms antiquity of vedic age.
Now proving worthyness of Rigvedic version on Saraswathi river, experts concluded that the river was mighty only in 6000BC or above.This proof pushed back the age of Rigveda atleast 6000BC or above.Another group studied proof of destruction for any invasion in all Harappan sites nothing is found to prove, it is proved beyond doubt that in 1900BC(end of Harappan period)no invasion not at all happened.Experts debunked totally Aryan Invasion theory of British period.
Another side Harappan seals were busy studied by expers.One group keeping it Dravidian script elaborately tried hell bent but finally could not move even an inch ahead.But those experts studied with open mind like S.R.Rao,the world renowned archeologist and head of Indian archeology finally proved that Harappan scripts are earlier form of sanskrit scripts.
Those experts conducted field studies, finally proved by all independent studies both Indian and western that the so called river Saraswathi dried in 1900BC before running as a mighty river for thousands and thousands of years and finally due to techtonic movements which resulted in feeding river like Dristadvati changed the course to Indus river.Now,it is proved Harappans left wonderful constructed cities in 1900bc because of severe famine.Not because of any Invasion.
As early as 1900AD,British posted in Thar desert reported big paleochannels there and opined that some big river ran once.But fnally truth exposed by satellite pictures which accurately provided entire paleochannel pictures of the river which is exact with the Rigveda details.After,this many expert groups both Indian and western conductd elaborate field study and scientiic analysis such salt content,isotopes level etc., on the river bed.
Rigveda praises river Saraswathi more than 60 times and it says it is mighty river,mightier than all and most holiest.
Rigveda says it originated in Himalaya,being south of Indus and finally merged in sea.Day to rituals also Saraswathi river is prayed along with river Ganges and Indus.Rigveda tells Saraswathi river is most holy and source of Vedic Aryan's sustenance.
with the Brahminical formulae would have been, e.g.: "Aldebaran was therefore 40' before
the point of the vernal equinox, according to the Indian astronomy, in the year 3102 before
Christ. [Modern astronomy] gives the longitude of that star 13' from the vernal equinox at the time of Calyougham agreeing within 53' with the determination of the Indian astronomy.
The whole tour is made in about 25,791 years, the longest cycle manageable for naked-eye observers. If data about the precession are properly recorded, they provide the best and often the only clue to an absolute chronology for ancient events. If we can read the Vedic and post-Vedic indications properly, they mention constellations on the equinox points which were there from 4,300 BC for the Rig-Veda
The truly strong evidence for a high chronology of the Vedas is the Vedic information about the position of the equinox. The phenomenon of the precession of the equinoxes takes the ecliptical constellations (also known as the sidereal Zodiac, i.e. those constellations through which the sun passes) slowly past the vernal equinox point, i.e. the intersection of ecliptic and equator, rising due East on the horizon.
Another,system called 'smirthi' where meaning should never allowed to change but one can expand. 'Shruthi' only meant for Vedas and 'Smirithi' applicable for other texts other than VEDAS..We can say Vedas are simply tape recorder of what Vedic Aryan ancestors chanted many many thousands of years ago in all aspects.Being totally unchanged and every details in that preserved with utmost attention, the historic details given in them are very accurate to the extent it contained in them.
Vedas are most holiest texts for Vedic people.Vedic people followed 'Shruthi' system by which a very small phonetic change also not allowed while chanting Vedas.This is followed still today.This kind of preservation of originality of Vedic texts from ancient times is unparalleled in the entire human history and unique to Vedas only.
. First,I like to disprove those Aryan Invasion theory.This theory already debunked by experts due to following details. What is Aryan Invasion theory? Aryan invasion theory says that Aryans came from outside India around 1500BC to 2000BC and destroyed already existing advanced culture,that is of Harappans.
Your German scholar pathetically lack very modern genetic study details.
The recent elaborate genetic study released on 25th Sep2009 in India confirmed that black Dravidians of South India nowhere related to any of the present day Africans.Verify.
Second,it disproved Aryan Invasion theory totally.It gives Vedic Aryans much much antiquity around 40,000 years.
@Saraswathiputra it was not a POST OF GENETIC STUDIES.. but tell me, while you blather on about resources being "outdated" YOU HAVE YET TO POST A SINGLE RESOURCE!
Ahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! "Black s definitely lacking knowledge."<<< YOU LACKING GRAMMAR & you enlighten me with NOTHING if you can't cite your RESOURCES!
You are showing us where YOU stand and its on the idiot side of the line. ;P
@Saraswathiputra Both T.A. Buckley's CITIES OF THE ANCIENT WORLD & Professor T. Inman's "Ancient Pagan and Modern Symbolism" contain the following statement concerning the African origins of the earliest gods in human history: "From the woolly texture of the hair, I am inclined to assign the Buddah of India, the Fuhi of China, the Sommonacom of the Siamese, the Zaha of the Japanese and the Quetzecoatl of the Mexicans, the same and indeed an AFRICAN, or rather NUBIAN origin."
@Saraswathiputra Despite it being obvious that your logical fallacies make someone incredible for being African vs.Eurocentric<- not that THAT adds credibility either, not only did Diop state that Buddah was an Egyptian priest, chased from Memphis by the persecutions of the Cambyses, but: Koempfer, in his Histoire du Japan claims that the Sacya Buddah of India was a priest from Memphis who fled from Egypt when Cambyses invaded it. The tradition justifies Buddah's woolly hair.
@Saraswathiputra The Buddah belonged to a culture that inhabited the Indus Valley known as the Harappa. These people were of the Black Race. It was within the rigid philosophical & scientific cultural structure of these people that gave birth to yoga, the Ayur-Veda (Eastern system of medicine), & a comprehensive understanding of the functionality of the Universe & how it relates to man.-1.Philosophies of India, Heinrich Zimmer, Boligen Series xxvi Princeton pp 196,221,228-229,281-282 cont'd..
@Saras-cont'd: 2. The Wonder That Was India, A.O. Basham pages 26-43;32 ( paragraph 2); 305 ( paragraph 2); pages 364-369. Source-Clover International
I fail to see how they depicted themselves as Indians while Nubian hieroglyphics sho Nubians with the same skin tone as Egyptians. Also, there are Ethiopians and Somalians to this day who still practice some of the traditions the Egyptians once did. And still speaking Afroasiatic languages which was of the same language family as the Egyptians. And you say these Africans are living by Indian traditions/languages.
Again, you ignore what the Egyptians themselves stated. Ok, use references from the Egyptians. Not the Indians. Oh, and don't come to me with that light skin BS. Some Egyptians were depicted with Black skin but they all were depicted with hairstyles similiar to those of Africans. Not Indians. Besides. The Nubians depicted their ppl with the same skin color as the Egyptians did. Which is light brown, to reddish to black. Black comes in all shades.
CipherQ,if ancient Egyptians Pharaohs looked like blacks,you have to check your eyes.
Ancient Egyptian old dynasty Pharaohs exactly looked like Indians which confirm the veracity of ancient Indian text that tells,Solar dynasty king Asa Manja aka Menes went from ancient India.
First off, why do you dismiss the fact that Egyptians said it themselves that they originated in Punt? What could you possibly prove? Egypt's culture had an African background. Like for instance, both King Tut and Akhenaten both had elongated skulls. It is actually an African tradition to bind one's head to make their skull longer. Not indian.
the great rulers of Egypt don't look african, they look asian...Tut looked black obviously. But if you look at all the great statues, Rameses II, Thutmosis III, Hatshepsut, Akenaten, and many many others they look nothing like africans, they look like asians. Plus we all know the Egyptians wore wigs for the most part, and they've found the wigs to prove it.
Yes, we all know that the Egyptians wore Wigs to look black, though they were still Asian despite their writting system was of African origins, their culture was African, religious beliefs-African, and so were most of their Gods. But the Egyptians had slanted eyes in Hieroglyphics and thats all the proof we need to Prove they were Asian. Nubians were also asian because they too had slanted eyes.
Either way, the Egyptians themselves stated they were from a land called "Punt." This place is said to either be in Ethiopia or in a place like Arabia. But Egyptians depicted Punt to of been a place with animals/plants indigenous to Africa. They even stated that the Nubians were from this place Punt as well. Therefore the Egyptians had the same origins as the Nubs.
Punt is in what what is presently known as Somalia.
but why do you continue to debate with this person who think Menes looks Indian? you should have asked him if Nehesi or Djoser still look Indian...i think engaging in these kind of debates degrades someone. i cannot see any way that the ancient Egyptians can be confused for any other people except black Africans (especially from predynastic period up to the 13th dynasty).
@Saraswathiputra - Professor C. Seignobos of the University of Paris in his book "History of Civilization" traces civilization back to Africa.-
"It is within the limits of Asia & Africa that the first CIVILIZED PEOPLES had their development: the Egyptians in the Nile Valley, the Chaldeans in the plains of Euphrates. Their skin was dark, the hair short and thick, the lips strong ( some terming them Cushites,others Hamites.)
@Saraswathiputra The German scholar of history, Herr Eugen Geog declared: " A splendid era of black seems to have PRECEDED all the the later races! There must once have been a tremendous Negro expansion, since the original masters of all the lands between Iberia and the Cape of Good Hope and EAST INDIA were primitive & probably dwarfed BLACK MEN. We have long had proof that a primitive "negroid" race of pigmies once lived around the Mediterranean. Blacks were the 1st to plow the mud of the Nile.
The Ancient Indians were black.. descended from the SAME CUSHITE group as the Ethiopians & Mizraim ( later called Egypt), same group as the Sumerians...all Khamitic people.
I'm talking about East Africa because the Egyptians depicted themselves with the same hair typical to the region. Seeing thats where the oldest bones are, its natural that there would be ppl with varying features.
Ginger dates back to 3300 BCE. Nubian history goes back to 3,800 BCE. This is also supported by Roman records. The Greeks first stated that the Egyptians got most of their culture and tradition from the Ethiopians. Not from any other culture.
East Africa is heavily mixed with Caucasian & Arab, it explains why those mixed negroes have such features, East Africans are not North East Africans/ Egyptians. Egypt was in the cross-roads of Europe and Asia and people migrated from there to Egypt and N.A. during the Neolithic and earlier.
Greeks are a much younger civ than Egypt and wouldnt know Egypts origins.
You dont obtain variation without admixture. The fact that northern Africa was white and that whiteness declines as one moves south and west into the Congo suggests that any migrations were by whites in to Africa, not by blacks out of Africa.
@CipherQ LOL @ "Roman records" They werent even around at the time to document any of this - they were the proto-Europeans still in the M.E. and no that is not where the "oldest bones" are. Egypt rose first and conquered Nubia, that is why Nubias tiny pyramids come much much later along with everything else they borrowed. Egyptian graves are found in Nubia.
@phoenician7 whties themselves are testimony to blacks leaving africa 1,2 all non whites arabs phonecians have admixture with the original blacks who left africa and the whties who had mutated, blonds cant make dark haired children period.
Your best arguement is that the DNA tests reveal that the Egyptians were white which makes no sence considering historical evidence. Before a certain point in time, Egyptians were described as black.
And I will admit that I can't find any blacks with long red hair. As you can also admit that there are none in Indians either. Besides, Rameses died at an old age. His hair would've naturally turned grey rather than being red.
Historical, linguistic and genetic data all coincide that they were not negroids. Look at the 13thD image of Khnumnakht, does she *realllly* look like a negroid to you are you merely engaged in self-deception!?
Who is talking about Indians? LOL They are not Egyptians and Ramses hair was gray but not his ROOTS which were red.
"Ramses hair was gray but now his ROOTS which were red."
Yeah, that does make a lot of since seeing that everybody's hair (black and white) has a miniscule amout of the RED color gene. So finding his roots to be red is no way to determine his race. Some mummies went over 5,000 years of decomposing. The red is most likely from the hyenna dye seeing that the Egyptians aimed to preserve flesh, not hair.
His hair was scientifically tested and microscopically analyzed by four independent labs. His natural hair was red, despite the henna used to preserve the redness during old age. It was also determined he had oval-cross sections - a strictly Caucasian hair trait. Never mind he had leucoderm (White) skin, but you racist are intent in claiming Whites as negroes. It is laughable to the educated.
@phoenician7 agree totally with you, my argument is if the Ancient Egyptians were Negroid peoples what happened to the rest of Africa which was basically a Wilderness up till the 18 century when Europeans brought technology there, surely a race as sophisticated as the Ancient Egyptians would have influenced land nearer their origins "assuming they originated in Ethiopia" , Egypt is nearer to Europe than Uganda say so no surprise if they were Caucasian then.
@mickeyh1961 Africa is full of evidence of technology and civilization. Thats why as soon as Europeans got guns powerful to ward off African soldiers, they rushed in and tried to destroy what they could not carry off.
Strange how the european industrial revolution took off not 30 years after pillage of Kemet by Napoleon and the British.
They had to bring every learned man in Europe to attempt understand what was in the Kemetian temples and tombs.
@CipherQMummies don't decompose for 5,000 years, otherwise they wouldn't be mummies. They are preserved naturally or artificially - as in the case of Ramses, and his hair was perfectly preserved. They never hennaed their bodies, only their hair... their bodies were covered in resinous solutions.
No, you are trying to deny that people had feet which contributed to mass migrations across continents and into others. There werent *any* sub Saharans in predynastic Egypt. That is just the way it was... the Bantu expansion took place way too late for that to happen, deal with it.
its pretty damn obvious that the Egyptians learned to burry their dead with such pompt and respect from the Nubians who's tombs predate Egyptian's tombs by two hundred years. Wheres the hint of Egypt in India?
And straight hair is not a white trait. Just about every black person in America has some white mixed in them, but none typically come with thin lips and long hair (atleast not the men). Though people in Africa do. Such as the President of Somalia.
@CipherQ East Africans are more mixed than American negroes. Now where is the evidence that Egyptians learned burials from Nubians? As far as Im aware, the oldest mummified Egyptian is Ginger, nothing in Nubia predates that, and Nubia as you know was very mixed. I have no clue what you're talking about India for other than the fact that they were described as being light-skinned like Northern Indians opposed to those in the south.
There is a reason why you've never seen Ancient Egyptians with Afros until recently. You're also never taught that the Ancient Greeks seemed to of held Ethiopians in high regard instead of Arabs. If we were mentally inferior ppl, they would've surely of noticed. That wasn't the case. But for some reason, to this day, we are taught that blacks had no history before slavery which is in fact a lie.
You've seen the Hieroglyphics and the Statues of black Egyptians.
And the reason is, because of the recent slave trade of negroids imported into Egypt during the Ottoman rule. What history does sub Saharan negroids have? You only talk about East Africans which are heavily admixed with Caucasian DNA.
Keep dreaming, none of the royal mummies are negroid.
East africans are heavily admixed with whites now?
Well then the Bushmen tribe of Africa must also be mixed with Asians seeing that when they are young, they have slanted eyes like a chinese person. Fact is that even if you're HALF chinese with black skin, you won't have these slanted eyes. If you're half white but dark skinned, you won't have a long narrow nose. There's no proof that an African with a long nose has white ancestry.
If you're half of anything, you will receive half of each parents genetic information. Mixes are in-betweens and do not fully receive from just one parent, but both.
watch?v=A7DfLZAMAkE
And yes, negroids with long narrow noses is a northern trait; they have Caucasian DNA, genitic studies CONFIRM it & you just admitted negroes have broad flat noses, but now you want to claim all types, hypocrite.
There are no Ethiopians with light skin. If they were mixed with Arabs or whatever, they would have lighter skin like Somalians. But no. Just thin lips and narrow noses.
And I'm curious to know; since Asian people have nothing BUT long hair, does that also mean that whites interbred with every Asian? If you think so, then where did they get slanted eyes from? Only ppl that I know of besides Asians who has those type of eyes are children from the Bushmen tribe of Africa. No, wait, its been scientifically proven that slanted eyes are an Asian trait and that Asians gave the bushmen ppl slanted eyes after going to Africa.
@phoenician7 : Wrong, face the truth. The anglo saxons are really Ancient African Albinos. No matter how much they try to cover it up with their incestuous inbreeding and plastic surgery, they'll always be African Albino Saxons. Why do you think the incestuous royals of england call themselves "The Black Nobility". Their dumbass m asses can't even figure it out. Get a grip. Caucasian DNA. The biggest lie ever sold to mankind. The gig is up.
@TRUTHEXPANDING Get a life you fucking nigger. 1st you claim Saxons are "albinos" then you claim they're "blacks" thus refuting your own pathetic "argument". Saxons are not "albinos" you racist fuck. This is just another desperate attempt of you degenerate have-nothings to claim civilizations that you had no part in.
@phoenician7 : Touched a subconscious tough truth. Tee Hee Hee, you jackass, Albino's are all of African descent. Learn some, then clean out your filthy mouth and soul.
"Nothing in the whole of Africa that resembles ancient Egypt"?
There is a reason why the land of Punt is thought to of been in Sudan. We've physical evidence of that. There's nothing in the whole of Asia which resembles ancient Egypt.
And no matter how much you twist it, there's no refuting these quotes. Scholars couldn't so they worked their way around it, or "tap-dance" as you say, but these quotes have definetly been found with the works of Aristotle.
You obviously havent read the descriptions of Punt as written by Hatshepsut. Physical "evidence" is LACKING for a Punt in Sudan. Punt is always described as being *eastward* of Egypt, not south. Hatshepsut herself identifies Punt as Lebanon.
No, physical evidence of Punt located in Asia is lacking.
Every animal, plant and everything else depicted in Egyptian Hieroglyphics are indigenous to Africa for the most part. Not Asia. Theres no evidence of Egypt in Asia while there are ruins of Pyramids further south.
LOL Egypts older neighbor Mesopotamia had lots of pyramids known as ziggurats. These are also the oldest type of pyramids erected in Egypt before the Great Pyramids or bent pyramids. Cedar; not renowned for growing in Ethiopia. Genetics show no migration from Somalia to Egypt. Three of the worlds leading Egyptologists have debunked Somalia as Punt.
So you claim that the Early Egyptians were Mesopatamians? Highly doubtful considering the fact that much of Egypt's religious beliefs, philosophy, traditions, kingship, architecture, musical instruments and art were undeniably African. ppl wouldn't of Migrated out of Asia, into Africa, learned of the ppl's culture and beliefs and decide to of built a civilization based off of it. Its proven that the Egyptians were native to Africa.
Egyptians would've most likely of been black ppl. Today's Egyptians wear more clothing to protect themselves from the harmful rays of the Sun. Ancient Egyptians wore a lot less clothing and their skin was oftenly naked. They needed a lot of melanin to keep themselves cool. Which is further proof that the first humans were black. They had to of been physically adapted to their climate. Africa gets the most amount of UV radiation than other continent.
No, Sub Saharans are "black" N.A received the same UV as its next door neighbors in the ME and surrounding Mediterranean. Egyptians also erected houses and temples for shade, they werent negroes. There is NO "proof" that the first humans were "black".
Not only does Egypt get the same amount of UV as the ME, but living near the Nile would've made things extremely humid. Now is there any source of shade near the Sphinx or any pyramids? And the Nubians also built many temples and erected houses. They were black, though it was claimed before that the Nubs were also white.
@CipherQ If you see the drawings of ancient nubians inside the pyramids of north sudan, you will see that they resemble those drawings found in egypt. Nubians of Sudan have the same skin colours of those drawings found in present egypt and sudan. Ancient egyptians were NOT different from nubians. They are look-a-like.
They also look like ethiopeans and eretrians. Since civilizations follow the stream of rivers, we can be sure that ethiopeans, nubians (north of sudan and south of egypt) and ancient egyptians are closely linked together genetically and ethnically.
And yet, there are those who claim that once upon a time ago, the Nile River ran from North to South, instead of South to North as it does in reality. Be that as it may, Egypt's culture is still undeniably African. Not Asian, or Mesopotamian, or what the hell ever. So many simple facts are being ignored with dealing with Egypt's history, that alone is proof that we're being lied to.
"The Ethiopians, as history relates, were the first of all menThey also say that the Egyptians are colonists sent out by the Ethiopians, Osiris having been the leader of the colonyAnd the larger part of the customs of the Egyptians are, they hold, Ethiopian, the colonists still preserving their ancient manners."
"For instance, the belief that their kings are gods, the very special attention which they pay to their burial, and many other matters of a similar nature are Ethiopian practices, while the shapes of their statues and the forms of their letters are Ethiopian." Diodorus also observed their statues (probably including the sphinx) and related it to the Ethiopians (Most likely referring to the Nubians) not Arabs.
"It is likely that the integument of the earliest protohominids was similar to that of our closest living relative, the chimpanzee, being white or lightly pigmented and covered with dark hair" (Post et al.,).
@phoenician7 so Punt was lLebanon ha ha so i guess thats why there queen was pictured with the big butt,steatopygic butt of africans wow punt was in Lebanon
Also, prove your claim. Where are the skeletal remains of caucasoids in the Horn of Africa. Blacks, being the first of all men, would naturally carry just about every trait, dude.
And there were scholars who compared Egypt with Ethiopia. Such as Lucian who seemed to also of had the impression that the Ethiopians founded Egypt. And Herodotus also stated there were 18 Ethiopian dynastic kings of Egypt while scholars tell us of only one.
Where is your evidence that negroids are "first" or that they have *every* trait? This is laughable to the educated. There is no evidence for reconstructing what the then contemporary African negro was like skeletally. One can only extrapolate from modern negroes who may not at all be like their ancestory since racial groups are not static, but evolve.
And blacks weren't the first to of evoled in Africa? Are you serious?
There's absolutely nothing recessive about black ppl. The skin color, eye color, broad noses, and thick lips alone are all dominate.
You come up with all these scientific studies which all contradict with the laws of nature. Where do you find animals indigenous to a biome which aren't even adapted to living there in the first place?
There is nothing "recessive" about any pure race, nimwit. And when two races mix you have a combination, not one that is dominate. Go look at a mulatto. Now here you are talking about broad noses, thick lips.... the mummies DO NOT have those, nor do your mixed race East Africans.
the jewish supremacists have great determination to supplant real history with lies. The many make-believe jewish patriarchs were invented to supplant historic Egyptians such as Amenemhet (Abraham), Thutmose (Moses) and Imhotep (Joseph). "Exodus" was invented to supplant the Code of Hammurabi with the Ten Commandments. "Holocaust" lies were promulgated to supplant the real mass murders of the Native Americans, West African slaves, Congolese, Armenians, Ukrainians, Poles, Japanese and Germans.
ElevenHolesInOne 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Melanin responsible for skin pigmentation, is insoluble & is preserved for millions of years in Mummies skins. Although the epidermis is the main site of the melanin, the melanocytes
penetrating the derm at the boundary between it and the epidermis, even where
the latter has mostly been destroyed by the embalming materials, show a melanin
level which is non-existent in the white-skinned races.
thus classifying the ancient Egyptians unquestionably among the black races.
Cheikh Anta Diop
DEFACTO9 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
the sphinx is not looking like brittany spears, it is looking like typical black African man.. would an acient people build such a monument of size so far back in honour of a slave or its "non- identified people? really? lolol I love being black
Entanglement9 1 month ago
hemp paper f face
donreifdk 1 month ago
The pyramids were not tombs. There are people that would like us to believe that nonsense. Sorry for them. That dog just won't hunt.
saintron60 1 month ago
Shalom - how about we as a people rise from all corners of the globe (blackman & woman) to take back whats rightfully ours (africa) - we need to demand for our own Political Government, schools, jobs, Army, Laws, Churches, Kings & queens & ect .... with the help of every participant this could be done in an orderly fashion - shalom i salam salakem (allthingsnew) 2012
KingOfAfrica2012 4 months ago
White People Are The Descendants Of African Albino's.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There is something different about being Black.
How can white be GOD of this world, if black is not the DEVIL of this world?
It is deeper than economics, it is deeper than religion.
Dr. Frances Cress Welsing wrote an excellent book about the psychology of Colors in this world: The Isis papers.
TRUTHEXPANDING 6 months ago
She puts forth the theory that because whites are the descendants of African Albino's and were rejected because of their genetic mutation, that this rejection is part of their core psychological being.
In essence she is saying that racism specifically against Blacks is deeper than economics and religion, it's in their psychological make up.
TRUTHEXPANDING 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Research:The Original Black Cultures of Eastern Europe and Asia
And their first contacts with the invading White People of Central Asia
This site explains ever thing........How the Africans gave birth to the races
dudley1957 6 months ago
They raped our people, our land, our history, and our identity...lets take back what is ours black people. These mutated devil CAUCAUS MOUNTAINEER CRACKKKERS time is up...these imposters are not chosen people of God, they were mere accident of freak science. God gave us the SUN, and ancient Egyptians worshipped the SUN but the CRACKKKERS hide from the SUN. It's cancer to their survival. They are completely different from the entire human race...fraud and cursed creatures without origin.
zxa105 6 months ago
Phoenician7: You give new meaning to the saying "Dumber than a doorknob". Hard to swallow that you're from the ancient African Albino eh? Get over it. I'm sure you're accustomed to doing alot of swallowing.
TRUTHEXPANDING 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• Mekota & Vermehren (2005) analyzed soft tissue from several New Kingdom Egyptian mummies, and found that the basal epithelial cells in the mummies’ skin were “packed with melanin as expected for specimens of Negroid origin.”
FLATFEET3 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• Mekota & Vermehren (2005) analyzed soft tissue from several New Kingdom Egyptian mummies, and found that the basal epithelial cells in the mummies’ skin were “packed with melanin as expected for specimens of Negroid origin.”
wooja54 7 months ago 2
The mummy of Hatshepsut"s father, Thutmoses the 1st, once had coarse wooly hair. There is a published photo of it in a 1930s book To see that and more pictorial evidence on blacks in Ancient Egyypt. Look at "Black Ancient Egypt; Truth Behind the Stoon SEE MY UPLOADS for more ne part 1-2
shariefwat 1 year ago
@shariefwat he was beja
LetMeTasteYa 8 months ago
Genetic study proving antiquity of Aryans in India to follow which once again disprove Aryan Invasion theory!
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
. Now, these texts do not speak about the aridity, desert conditions in the region, the change and the shift in the water regime and drying of the Sarasvati river. The fact is that these compositors knew only the mighty and the mature river. Secondly, this also shows that there is very little or no time gap between composition of the Mandal 2nd ,6th and 7th and original text of the Yajur Veda.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
This description of the Yajur Veda is supported by occurrence of more than one channels in Rajasthan and the deltas in the Sindh, South - west of the Rajasthan and in the Great Rann of Kachchh ( Malik et al.1999; 163 - 174, also see the figures). This also confirms the statement of the Reg Veda that Sarasvati was Saptathi meaning the Sarasvati had five disbutaries and two tributaries of the Satudri and Drashadvati.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
This clearly shows that like other mighty, mature rivers, in the flood plain of the Rajasthan, the Sarasvati eroded five channels through the horizontal erosions of the frequent floods of the very high magnitudes and used to flow through these five channels.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
. It says, Panchanadhya Sarasvatimapi Yanti Sasroyasah Sarasvati to Panchadhaa sodeshe abhavat sarit.( Y.S.34:19).
This indicates that the river had five mouths - the disbutaries.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
. This Rig Vedic descriptions thus clearly show that during the early Rig Vedic period, the Sarasvati was the most superior, the mightiest, mature and the most important river of this part of the continent. In the time of Yajur Veda, which seems to be a recomposition of the Reg Veda Mandal - 6, .the Sarasvati enjoyed the same status and the might. The details of the channels are recorded in the Vaj Sanehi Samhita of the Shukla yajur Veda
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
. The river had very amount of the flood discharge which must have cut the meanders and the disbutaries. During the floodings the river was roaring. The frequent floods used to spread over the vast areas recharging the lakes and bringing abundant water, silt and fertility and food and prosperity to all. That is why Sarasvati was praised by the Rsis.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
.The river was very rich in the lakes, the channels and the silts. However, when the Sarasvati was in spates of the high magnitudes and of the long duration it used to become fierce, uncontrollable and destructive. During the floodings, its current was extremely swift and fast having very high velocity which naturally generated and released high degree of the energy.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
In the flood plain the Sarasvati had the seven channel an it was the mightiest among all the rivers. When not in spate its glacial fed water was pure and white and the channel had golden sand.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
. Now, in the Rajasthan, several lakes and playas having riverine origin have been reported ( Rammurthy. 1999:158), this strengthens the very meaning and the name of the Sarasvati and also the Rig Vedic description of the river. So, from the Rig Veda following picture of the Sarasvati emerges out. That the Rig Vedic Sarasvati had its origin in the Himalaya and it used to fall into the sea.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Secondly, the very name of the Sarasvati denotes the river of having many lakes. Reg Veda refers many lakes. Among these, the Sharyanaavaan and the Dronkalash are the examples.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
One, the Sarasvati was the mother of all the rivers, the disbutaries. Second, the river was abundance in water to feed - fill the ocean like a mother feeding her child. The Sarasvati being the mightiest river must have brought such a large volume of the water into the sea, the present Ranns of Kachch, the then sea, showing her might ever the sea. This statement of the Reg Veda is supported by the numerous deltas and the bets in the Great Rann of Kachchh. ( Malik et. al 1999 : 163-174).
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
This shows that the river had six tributaries and disbutaries. The word Sindumaataa denotes two things.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The Rig Veda describes the Sarasvati as Saptathi and Sindhumaataa Aam Yat Saakam Yashaso Vavashaataa Sarasvati Saptathi Sindhumaataa (RV 7:36:6) This indicates including the Sarasvati, There were seven rivers.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
It says that the Sarasvati was superior to all the other rivers, best of the mother rivers as the Sarasvati was the main source of the prosperity and survival and was the life line of the inhabitants residing over there on the flood plain. The Sarasvati was also best of the goddesses as it used to bring prosperity in tremendous. The text describes its flow white in complexion indicating it was a glacial fed river.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Therefore, in praying the river, the Rig Veda described the Sarasvati as (Very important verse also)
Ambitame Naditame Devitame Sarasvati Aprashastaa Eva Smasi Prashastim Amba Naskrudhi (RV 2: 16:41)
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
This comparison of the Sindhu with the Sarasvati also clearly shows that the how mightier Sarasvati could be when the shatudri - present Sutlej was its tributary and how moderate the Sindhu could be without Shatudri - Present Sutlej ! Secondly, this overflowed water of the Sarasvati used to bring tremendous water and fertile silt for agriculture and faunal and floral wealth.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
This behavior of the river Sindhu is recorded right from the ptolemy, the Greek auther of the Medieval writers. The records indicate that when in spate the Sindhu erodes new channels, meanders and suddenly shifts its water into the newly cut channels, recharges these lakes and the abandons channels and swings towards the west as the flood plain slopes towards the south- west.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
However, in the flood of the high magnitude, the velocity in Sindh is about 12 km. per hour and the flood discharge increases to 27000 cms to 28000 cms. per second".
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
When the river was on its peaks of the floods, the velocity of the flood discharge at the up treamwas 8 km. per hour and the flood discharge was about 250 cms. to 800 cms. per second. But downstream the confluence, the river Sindhu becomes mightier and larger and the Sindh where the gradient is very low the width of the river channel varies from one km. to one and half km. and during the flood of the high magnitude the width of the channel increases to two kms
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Now to know the might of the Sarasvati over all the other rivers here, it is essential to know the Sindhu Flood mechanism as it has also a long history of the floodings. The Imperial Gezeteer notes ( Enthovon 1909:164-65,167-168). "Before taming, upstream to the confluence with the five river including the Satlej, the ancient Satudri, the width of the Sindhu is about half a Km.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
When in spate the might of river was sweeping away all the other waters and was mightiest among all the other rivers.
Prayaa Mahimna Mahinsu Chikite Dhumnebhiranya Apasaampastma Rath eva Bruhati Vibhvane Krutopastutya Chikitushaa Sarasvati.(RV: 6:61:13)
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The flood water was also overflowing both the banks and the flood waters filled or say inundated the earth, that is the vast urea of the flood plain and the heaven that is the Himalayan region.
Aaapashushi paarthivaanyuru rajo antariksham Sarasvati Nidaspaatu
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
.Iyam Shushmebhihibisakhaa Evaarujaatsaanu Girinam Tevishebhirumibhih Paravaathdhaneemavase Sruvruktibhihi Sarasvatimaa Vivaasemadhitibhihi. ( RV: 6:61:2)
Yasya Ananto Ahutastveshashacharishnuranavah : Amashcharati roruvat (RV: 6:61:8)
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The Rig Veda also informs us that when the Sarasvati was in spate the river was becoming uncontrollable and its current was the swiftest of the swifts. It further says that the velocity of the Sarasvati was so high that it broke the hill ranges and the river carried them ( as the flood load) down like lotus stems - see below:
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
It clearly mention that the
Ekachetaat Sarasvati Nadinaam Suchiryati Giribhya aa Samudrat. (RV :VII :95:2)
This is conformed by the work of puri. The renowned glaciologist (Puri.1998 per commu.)
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Rig Veda clearly describes the origin of the Sarasvati, its whole course, the nature and the behavior and its flood mechanism. It also describes its role in shaping of the life of the people residing in the flood plain. Maximum number of the references on the Sarasvati river come from the Mandala 2nd, 6th and 7th of the early text (Singh, Shivaji. 1998 : 29-33). Rig Veda clearly mentions that the Sarasvati had its origin in the Himalaya and not in the Siwalik Hills
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
. At the first glance, the hymns are seemed to be the prayers. But in the analytic eyes, they reveal valuable historical information of the palaeaoclimate, the types of rains, the waters in the mountains and also on the earth, the clouds and their formations, the draughts, the river beds, the floods and the river, the floodings and the waters, digging or eroding of the new channels, the takes and so on. (Griffith; 1889; Shri Swami.1972
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Before,many people dont know what exactly said on Saraswathi river in Rigveda.
We will see those details completely with Sanskrit sloka with accurate translation after some time.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Here,so much reliable information given from various sources of different nature,but everyone confirms the details of the other!No contradiction at all!
We will see also genetics!!
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Still continue.......................
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Most of the cities of the Saraswati and Indus valley followed these principles exactly. Since these cities were constructed as early as 6,500 to 7,000 BC, this would suggest that Sthapatya Veda may have been known as early as that. This gives another reason to put the origins of Rig Vedic tradition even before that time. This is another bit of evidence, which is not noted in previous literature, that may establish the great antiquity of the Rig Vedic tradition.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The ancient architectural system of Sthapatya Veda prescribes detailed principles of construction of homes and cities. One of the main principles of Sthapatya Veda is that cities be laid out on an exact north-south grid, with all houses facing due east. Another is that the buildings be oriented to the east with a slope to the east and any body of water on the east.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The medieval Kashmiri historian Kalhana claimed that the previous cycle had started in 3076 BC, and the present one in AD 525. J.E. Mitchiner has suggested that the beginning of the Saptarshi reckoning was one more cycle earlier, in 6676 BC: "We may conclude that the older and original version of the Era of the Seven Rsis commenced with the Seven Rsis in Krttika in 6676 BC, used a total of 28 Naksatras, and placed the start of the Kali Yuga in 3102 BC
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The Puranic king-list as known to Greek visitors of Chandragupta court in the 4th century BC or to later Greco-Roman India-watchers, started in 6776 BC.Pliny wrote that the Indians date their first king, "Liber Pater", to "6,451 years and 3 months" before Alexander the Great (d. 323 BC),while Arrian puts the dynastic list at 6,042 + 300 + 120 = 6,462 years before Sandrokottos (Chandragupta), to whom a Greek embassy sent in 314 BC.Both indications add up to a date, give or take a year, of 6776 BC
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
grahamhancock com/forum/BadrinaryanB1dotphp
Anybody interested to know the antiquity of Vedic city of Dwaraka, other details on its scientific dating and photos of underground city may visit the above site. Just put (.)where I have written as dot and before com.Dont copy and paste.You wont get the site.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The conclusion through Saraswathi river on Vedic age conformed by another gulf of cambay underwater excavation.One more proof is from harappan site of Dholavira, where many skeketons were excavated.Vedic altars also got.Artifacts found were sent to scientific dating gave value of 7000bc.One after other conforming Vedic time scale.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Another very powerful proof of Vedic age is given by Lord Krishnas Dwarka underwater excavation done in 2002.One can see online all submerged cities,fort etc and details.All forts and cities submerged were found which exactly as per Mahabharata version.Many artifiacts were found.Two drilled wood pieces were sent for scientific dating to two places in Europe.One gave value of 5500 BC and another is 7500 years.But 7500 BC is more stronger as per experts.Which conforms antiquity of vedic age.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Now proving worthyness of Rigvedic version on Saraswathi river, experts concluded that the river was mighty only in 6000BC or above.This proof pushed back the age of Rigveda atleast 6000BC or above.Another group studied proof of destruction for any invasion in all Harappan sites nothing is found to prove, it is proved beyond doubt that in 1900BC(end of Harappan period)no invasion not at all happened.Experts debunked totally Aryan Invasion theory of British period.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Another side Harappan seals were busy studied by expers.One group keeping it Dravidian script elaborately tried hell bent but finally could not move even an inch ahead.But those experts studied with open mind like S.R.Rao,the world renowned archeologist and head of Indian archeology finally proved that Harappan scripts are earlier form of sanskrit scripts.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Those experts conducted field studies, finally proved by all independent studies both Indian and western that the so called river Saraswathi dried in 1900BC before running as a mighty river for thousands and thousands of years and finally due to techtonic movements which resulted in feeding river like Dristadvati changed the course to Indus river.Now,it is proved Harappans left wonderful constructed cities in 1900bc because of severe famine.Not because of any Invasion.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
As early as 1900AD,British posted in Thar desert reported big paleochannels there and opined that some big river ran once.But fnally truth exposed by satellite pictures which accurately provided entire paleochannel pictures of the river which is exact with the Rigveda details.After,this many expert groups both Indian and western conductd elaborate field study and scientiic analysis such salt content,isotopes level etc., on the river bed.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Rigveda praises river Saraswathi more than 60 times and it says it is mighty river,mightier than all and most holiest.
Rigveda says it originated in Himalaya,being south of Indus and finally merged in sea.Day to rituals also Saraswathi river is prayed along with river Ganges and Indus.Rigveda tells Saraswathi river is most holy and source of Vedic Aryan's sustenance.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
These are the versions of astronomers themselves.Not of mine.I have given very clearly those names of western astronomers.
This details already there but not known to many!
Others more powerful proofs follow!
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The observations on which the astronomy
of India is founded, were made more than three thousand years before the Christian era.
Two other elements of this astronomy, the equation of the sun's centre and the
obliquity of the ecliptic seem to point to a period still more remote,
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Prof. N. S. Rajaram, a mathematician who has worked for NASA, comments: "fabricating
astronomical data going back thousands of years calls for knowledge of Newton's
Law of Gravitation and the ability to solve differential equations." Failing this advanced
knowledge, the data in the Brahminical tables must be based on actual observation. Ergo,
the Sanskrit-speaking Vedic seers were present in person to record astronomical observations
and preserve them for a full 6,000 years:
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
What Hindu astronomical lore about ancient times cannot be based on later back-calculation,
was also argued by Playfair's contemporary, the French astronomer Jean-Sylvain Bailly:
"The motions of the stars calculated by the Hindus before some 4500 years vary not even
a single minute from the [modern] tables of Cassini and Meyer. The Indian tables give
the same annual variation of the moon as that discovered by Tycho Brahe - a variation
unknown to the school of Alexandria and also the Arabs."
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
This agreement is the more remarkable, that the Brahmins, by
their own rules for computing the motion of the fixed stars, could not have assigned this
place to Aldebaran for the beginning of Calyougham, had they calculated it from a modern
observation. For as they make the motion of the fixed stars too great by more than 3"
annually if they had calculated backward from 1491, they would have placed the fixed
stars less advanced by 4 or 5 degree at their ancient epoch than they actually done
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
And what the results of back-calculations
with the Brahminical formulae would have been, e.g.: "Aldebaran was therefore 40' before
the point of the vernal equinox, according to the Indian astronomy, in the year 3102 before
Christ. [Modern astronomy] gives the longitude of that star 13' from the vernal equinox at the time of Calyougham agreeing within 53' with the determination of the Indian astronomy.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Back-calculation of planetary positions is a highly complex affair requiring knowledge
of a number of physical laws, universal constants and actual measurements of densities,
diameters and distances. Though Brahminical astronomy was remarkably sophisticated for
its time, it could only back-calculate planetary position of the presumed Vedic age with
an inaccuracy margin of at least several degrees of arc. With our modern knowledge, it is
easy to determine what the actual positions were.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Bentley did not object to astronomy per se, in so far as it could be helpful in showing up
the falsehood of Brahminical scriptures. However, it did precisely the reverse. Falsehood
in this context could have meant that the Brahmins falsely claimed high antiquity for their
texts by presenting as ancient astronomical observations recorded in Scripture what were in
fact back-calculations from a much later age. But Playfair showed that this was impossible.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
In 1825, Bentley objected: "By his [= Playfair's]
attempt to uphold the antiquity of Hindu books against absolute facts, thereby
supports all those horrid abuses and impositions found in them, under the pretended sanction
of antiquity. Nay, his aim goes still deeper, for by the same means he endeavours to overturn the mosaic account& foundation of his Xtian religion.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
His proposal was dismissed as absurd by some, but it was not refuted by any scientist.
Playfair's judicious use of astronomy was countered by John Bentley with a Scriptural
argument which we now must consider invalid.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The Vedic corpus being vast one of the earliest estimates of the date of the Vedas was at once among the most scientific.
In 1790, the Scottish mathematician John Playfair demonstrated that the starting-date of
the astronomical observations recorded in the tables still in use among Hindu astrologers
(of which three copies had reached Europe between 1687 and 1787) had to be 4300 BC.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The whole tour is made in about 25,791 years, the longest cycle manageable for naked-eye observers. If data about the precession are properly recorded, they provide the best and often the only clue to an absolute chronology for ancient events. If we can read the Vedic and post-Vedic indications properly, they mention constellations on the equinox points which were there from 4,300 BC for the Rig-Veda
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
The truly strong evidence for a high chronology of the Vedas is the Vedic information about the position of the equinox. The phenomenon of the precession of the equinoxes takes the ecliptical constellations (also known as the sidereal Zodiac, i.e. those constellations through which the sun passes) slowly past the vernal equinox point, i.e. the intersection of ecliptic and equator, rising due East on the horizon.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Iam discussing here Various proofs in the following headings.
1)Astrological study by expert astronomers
2)Archeological details of very very recent origin
Verifiable details.
Others details include outside India details which confirm the archeology and astronomical studies.
The final is genetic study of very recent origin confirming all the above!
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Another,system called 'smirthi' where meaning should never allowed to change but one can expand. 'Shruthi' only meant for Vedas and 'Smirithi' applicable for other texts other than VEDAS..We can say Vedas are simply tape recorder of what Vedic Aryan ancestors chanted many many thousands of years ago in all aspects.Being totally unchanged and every details in that preserved with utmost attention, the historic details given in them are very accurate to the extent it contained in them.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Vedas are most holiest texts for Vedic people.Vedic people followed 'Shruthi' system by which a very small phonetic change also not allowed while chanting Vedas.This is followed still today.This kind of preservation of originality of Vedic texts from ancient times is unparalleled in the entire human history and unique to Vedas only.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
VEDAS:Vedas are the oldest attested Aryan Document.Vedas are unchanged language( abrabasha)Why?
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Before I like to tell something about Vedas.If you could not understand those Vedas,simply to follow those details definitely difficult.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
. First,I like to disprove those Aryan Invasion theory.This theory already debunked by experts due to following details. What is Aryan Invasion theory? Aryan invasion theory says that Aryans came from outside India around 1500BC to 2000BC and destroyed already existing advanced culture,that is of Harappans.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Wait for the detail.I will provide!
Iam yesterday had very urgent work in between!
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Why you references so much outdated.Because it is suit your agenda.Is it not?
Now,Iam giving flood of information which you can verify yourself.
If any doubt are there,you may ask more information.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra
1.show us a indian pharoah please
failure to do so means you are talking shit as usual.
1976slater 1 year ago
Buddha belonged to a culture that belonged to Harappan!
Ha!Ha!Ha!
Black s definitely lacking knowledge.
Buddha was born in Kshatriya family being lineage of Gautama Aryan Rishi
Again,I think that you people still outdated and update your knowledge.
Akready,in the last ten years Aryan invasion theory debunked.
Now,it is proved beyond doubt that Harappans were Vedic Aryans.
I have to enlighten you, my dear.
Wait! I will show you where you people stand!!
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
Your German scholar pathetically lack very modern genetic study details.
The recent elaborate genetic study released on 25th Sep2009 in India confirmed that black Dravidians of South India nowhere related to any of the present day Africans.Verify.
Second,it disproved Aryan Invasion theory totally.It gives Vedic Aryans much much antiquity around 40,000 years.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra it was not a POST OF GENETIC STUDIES.. but tell me, while you blather on about resources being "outdated" YOU HAVE YET TO POST A SINGLE RESOURCE!
Ahaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!! "Black s definitely lacking knowledge."<<< YOU LACKING GRAMMAR & you enlighten me with NOTHING if you can't cite your RESOURCES!
You are showing us where YOU stand and its on the idiot side of the line. ;P
EbonyLoveAndMarriage 1 year ago
What you are telling is that of ancient approximations but not modern one.Even King Tut recent genetic test proved to be R1b which is not black.
Previously many people uttered many things.
Here two things more reliable.
One is ancient archeology and inscriptions. and second is the genetic test result on those Pharaohs mummy itself!.
This indicate,there were definitely black people in Egypt as civilians but Pharaohs and royals never belonged to black people.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra yet again ZERO RESOURCES CITED!! your opinions don't mean anything to me.. RESOURCES, RESOURCES!
EbonyLoveAndMarriage 1 year ago
Those Afrocentric professor it seems like Diop who is fanatic and creation of his own imagination.
I will give the book, you please study.
This book is more scientific and meaningful!
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra Both T.A. Buckley's CITIES OF THE ANCIENT WORLD & Professor T. Inman's "Ancient Pagan and Modern Symbolism" contain the following statement concerning the African origins of the earliest gods in human history: "From the woolly texture of the hair, I am inclined to assign the Buddah of India, the Fuhi of China, the Sommonacom of the Siamese, the Zaha of the Japanese and the Quetzecoatl of the Mexicans, the same and indeed an AFRICAN, or rather NUBIAN origin."
EbonyLoveAndMarriage 1 year ago 2
@Saraswathiputra Despite it being obvious that your logical fallacies make someone incredible for being African vs.Eurocentric<- not that THAT adds credibility either, not only did Diop state that Buddah was an Egyptian priest, chased from Memphis by the persecutions of the Cambyses, but: Koempfer, in his Histoire du Japan claims that the Sacya Buddah of India was a priest from Memphis who fled from Egypt when Cambyses invaded it. The tradition justifies Buddah's woolly hair.
EbonyLoveAndMarriage 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra The Buddah belonged to a culture that inhabited the Indus Valley known as the Harappa. These people were of the Black Race. It was within the rigid philosophical & scientific cultural structure of these people that gave birth to yoga, the Ayur-Veda (Eastern system of medicine), & a comprehensive understanding of the functionality of the Universe & how it relates to man.-1.Philosophies of India, Heinrich Zimmer, Boligen Series xxvi Princeton pp 196,221,228-229,281-282 cont'd..
EbonyLoveAndMarriage 1 year ago
@Saras-cont'd: 2. The Wonder That Was India, A.O. Basham pages 26-43;32 ( paragraph 2); 305 ( paragraph 2); pages 364-369. Source-Clover International
EbonyLoveAndMarriage 1 year ago
Heiroglyphics weren't a fucking picture language.. Each "PICTURE" represented a sound.
oblivion292 1 year ago
hey im learning this at school im in 6th grade
Swampertful 1 year ago
@Swampertful me too
AnnalizaBubbles 1 year ago
egypt have nice history
i like it
nice beautiful pyrimads
MegaLiverpoolfc 1 year ago
anyone ever wonder why the egyptians are given credit for building the pyramids but couldnt even draw the side view of an eye correctly?
vengencefrom1979 1 year ago
Osiris on the temple walls always look obviously Black African. But in the history books he is quite white washed. what a joke things have become...
hoodprophet 1 year ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
"It is thus clear that it was THE WHOLE OF THE EGYPTIAN POPULATION WHICH WAS NEGRO,"
GENERAL HISTORY OF AFRICA (Ancient Civilizations of Africa II)
(Abridged ed. copyright 1981 publ.1990; Chapt.1 pg.16 para.5)
U.N.E.S.C.O.(United Nations Educational Scientific & Cultural Organization)
International Scientific Committee for the Drafting of a General history of Africa
asrafoo 1 year ago
wow its funny how u idots could argue so much over a 42 second video.. get a life. and get of the computer.
gtjet1 1 year ago
Comment removed
CipherQ 1 year ago
Egyptian depicted them as Indians.Dont tell your story.
Did you study my comments.Those are from the clay tablet details of that time.
Study my comments from those videos.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra
I fail to see how they depicted themselves as Indians while Nubian hieroglyphics sho Nubians with the same skin tone as Egyptians. Also, there are Ethiopians and Somalians to this day who still practice some of the traditions the Egyptians once did. And still speaking Afroasiatic languages which was of the same language family as the Egyptians. And you say these Africans are living by Indian traditions/languages.
CipherQ 1 year ago
Follow my comment in 'Real Egypt' video.You will get proof and answer to all questions.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra
Again, you ignore what the Egyptians themselves stated. Ok, use references from the Egyptians. Not the Indians. Oh, and don't come to me with that light skin BS. Some Egyptians were depicted with Black skin but they all were depicted with hairstyles similiar to those of Africans. Not Indians. Besides. The Nubians depicted their ppl with the same skin color as the Egyptians did. Which is light brown, to reddish to black. Black comes in all shades.
CipherQ 1 year ago 2
CipherQ,if ancient Egyptians Pharaohs looked like blacks,you have to check your eyes.
Ancient Egyptian old dynasty Pharaohs exactly looked like Indians which confirm the veracity of ancient Indian text that tells,Solar dynasty king Asa Manja aka Menes went from ancient India.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra According to who and what. Give me evidence.
tw1704 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra
Umm...no.
First off, why do you dismiss the fact that Egyptians said it themselves that they originated in Punt? What could you possibly prove? Egypt's culture had an African background. Like for instance, both King Tut and Akhenaten both had elongated skulls. It is actually an African tradition to bind one's head to make their skull longer. Not indian.
CipherQ 1 year ago
the great rulers of Egypt don't look african, they look asian...Tut looked black obviously. But if you look at all the great statues, Rameses II, Thutmosis III, Hatshepsut, Akenaten, and many many others they look nothing like africans, they look like asians. Plus we all know the Egyptians wore wigs for the most part, and they've found the wigs to prove it.
flarbton 1 year ago
@flarbton You gave an opinion with no evidence. Your comment means nothing.
tw1704 1 year ago
@flarbton
Yes, we all know that the Egyptians wore Wigs to look black, though they were still Asian despite their writting system was of African origins, their culture was African, religious beliefs-African, and so were most of their Gods. But the Egyptians had slanted eyes in Hieroglyphics and thats all the proof we need to Prove they were Asian. Nubians were also asian because they too had slanted eyes.
Thats how you sound, flarbton.
CipherQ 1 year ago
Egyptian first Pharaoh Menes who united Egypt was from Solar dynasty of ancient India.Many of his supporters followed him.
Ancient Indian records are there to prove this..
This is the truth.
Saraswathiputra 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra
Menes looked black enough to me...
Either way, the Egyptians themselves stated they were from a land called "Punt." This place is said to either be in Ethiopia or in a place like Arabia. But Egyptians depicted Punt to of been a place with animals/plants indigenous to Africa. They even stated that the Nubians were from this place Punt as well. Therefore the Egyptians had the same origins as the Nubs.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
Punt is in what what is presently known as Somalia.
but why do you continue to debate with this person who think Menes looks Indian? you should have asked him if Nehesi or Djoser still look Indian...i think engaging in these kind of debates degrades someone. i cannot see any way that the ancient Egyptians can be confused for any other people except black Africans (especially from predynastic period up to the 13th dynasty).
i find these debates in 21 century to be absurd!
TheKingShakaZulu 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra - Professor C. Seignobos of the University of Paris in his book "History of Civilization" traces civilization back to Africa.-
"It is within the limits of Asia & Africa that the first CIVILIZED PEOPLES had their development: the Egyptians in the Nile Valley, the Chaldeans in the plains of Euphrates. Their skin was dark, the hair short and thick, the lips strong ( some terming them Cushites,others Hamites.)
EbonyLoveAndMarriage 1 year ago
@Saraswathiputra The German scholar of history, Herr Eugen Geog declared: " A splendid era of black seems to have PRECEDED all the the later races! There must once have been a tremendous Negro expansion, since the original masters of all the lands between Iberia and the Cape of Good Hope and EAST INDIA were primitive & probably dwarfed BLACK MEN. We have long had proof that a primitive "negroid" race of pigmies once lived around the Mediterranean. Blacks were the 1st to plow the mud of the Nile.
EbonyLoveAndMarriage 1 year ago
-The Adventure of Mankind- E.P. Dutton & Co.,1931
-----------
The Ancient Indians were black.. descended from the SAME CUSHITE group as the Ethiopians & Mizraim ( later called Egypt), same group as the Sumerians...all Khamitic people.
EbonyLoveAndMarriage 1 year ago
Phoenician7
I'm talking about East Africa because the Egyptians depicted themselves with the same hair typical to the region. Seeing thats where the oldest bones are, its natural that there would be ppl with varying features.
Ginger dates back to 3300 BCE. Nubian history goes back to 3,800 BCE. This is also supported by Roman records. The Greeks first stated that the Egyptians got most of their culture and tradition from the Ethiopians. Not from any other culture.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
East Africa is heavily mixed with Caucasian & Arab, it explains why those mixed negroes have such features, East Africans are not North East Africans/ Egyptians. Egypt was in the cross-roads of Europe and Asia and people migrated from there to Egypt and N.A. during the Neolithic and earlier.
Greeks are a much younger civ than Egypt and wouldnt know Egypts origins.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@CipherQ
You dont obtain variation without admixture. The fact that northern Africa was white and that whiteness declines as one moves south and west into the Congo suggests that any migrations were by whites in to Africa, not by blacks out of Africa.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@CipherQ LOL @ "Roman records" They werent even around at the time to document any of this - they were the proto-Europeans still in the M.E. and no that is not where the "oldest bones" are. Egypt rose first and conquered Nubia, that is why Nubias tiny pyramids come much much later along with everything else they borrowed. Egyptian graves are found in Nubia.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7 whties themselves are testimony to blacks leaving africa 1,2 all non whites arabs phonecians have admixture with the original blacks who left africa and the whties who had mutated, blonds cant make dark haired children period.
richbullva 1 year ago
3,300 BCE, I mean
CipherQ 1 year ago
Your best arguement is that the DNA tests reveal that the Egyptians were white which makes no sence considering historical evidence. Before a certain point in time, Egyptians were described as black.
And I will admit that I can't find any blacks with long red hair. As you can also admit that there are none in Indians either. Besides, Rameses died at an old age. His hair would've naturally turned grey rather than being red.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
Historical, linguistic and genetic data all coincide that they were not negroids. Look at the 13thD image of Khnumnakht, does she *realllly* look like a negroid to you are you merely engaged in self-deception!?
Who is talking about Indians? LOL They are not Egyptians and Ramses hair was gray but not his ROOTS which were red.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7
"Ramses hair was gray but now his ROOTS which were red."
Yeah, that does make a lot of since seeing that everybody's hair (black and white) has a miniscule amout of the RED color gene. So finding his roots to be red is no way to determine his race. Some mummies went over 5,000 years of decomposing. The red is most likely from the hyenna dye seeing that the Egyptians aimed to preserve flesh, not hair.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
His hair was scientifically tested and microscopically analyzed by four independent labs. His natural hair was red, despite the henna used to preserve the redness during old age. It was also determined he had oval-cross sections - a strictly Caucasian hair trait. Never mind he had leucoderm (White) skin, but you racist are intent in claiming Whites as negroes. It is laughable to the educated.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7
If his hair was proven to of been naturally red, then where are Today's Red Head Egyptians?
CipherQ 1 year ago
@phoenician7 agree totally with you, my argument is if the Ancient Egyptians were Negroid peoples what happened to the rest of Africa which was basically a Wilderness up till the 18 century when Europeans brought technology there, surely a race as sophisticated as the Ancient Egyptians would have influenced land nearer their origins "assuming they originated in Ethiopia" , Egypt is nearer to Europe than Uganda say so no surprise if they were Caucasian then.
mickeyh1961 1 year ago
@mickeyh1961 Africa is full of evidence of technology and civilization. Thats why as soon as Europeans got guns powerful to ward off African soldiers, they rushed in and tried to destroy what they could not carry off.
Strange how the european industrial revolution took off not 30 years after pillage of Kemet by Napoleon and the British.
They had to bring every learned man in Europe to attempt understand what was in the Kemetian temples and tombs.
But they still could not decipher the hi-tech.
monkhillier 1 year ago
@CipherQMummies don't decompose for 5,000 years, otherwise they wouldn't be mummies. They are preserved naturally or artificially - as in the case of Ramses, and his hair was perfectly preserved. They never hennaed their bodies, only their hair... their bodies were covered in resinous solutions.
phoenician7 1 year ago
When I said whites tried taking Egypt out of Africa, I meant it as a figure of speech. As in alienating Egypt from its continent. Smartass.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
No, you are trying to deny that people had feet which contributed to mass migrations across continents and into others. There werent *any* sub Saharans in predynastic Egypt. That is just the way it was... the Bantu expansion took place way too late for that to happen, deal with it.
phoenician7 1 year ago
its pretty damn obvious that the Egyptians learned to burry their dead with such pompt and respect from the Nubians who's tombs predate Egyptian's tombs by two hundred years. Wheres the hint of Egypt in India?
And straight hair is not a white trait. Just about every black person in America has some white mixed in them, but none typically come with thin lips and long hair (atleast not the men). Though people in Africa do. Such as the President of Somalia.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ East Africans are more mixed than American negroes. Now where is the evidence that Egyptians learned burials from Nubians? As far as Im aware, the oldest mummified Egyptian is Ginger, nothing in Nubia predates that, and Nubia as you know was very mixed. I have no clue what you're talking about India for other than the fact that they were described as being light-skinned like Northern Indians opposed to those in the south.
phoenician7 1 year ago
Comment removed
CipherQ 1 year ago
There is a reason why you've never seen Ancient Egyptians with Afros until recently. You're also never taught that the Ancient Greeks seemed to of held Ethiopians in high regard instead of Arabs. If we were mentally inferior ppl, they would've surely of noticed. That wasn't the case. But for some reason, to this day, we are taught that blacks had no history before slavery which is in fact a lie.
You've seen the Hieroglyphics and the Statues of black Egyptians.
That should be enough.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
And the reason is, because of the recent slave trade of negroids imported into Egypt during the Ottoman rule. What history does sub Saharan negroids have? You only talk about East Africans which are heavily admixed with Caucasian DNA.
Keep dreaming, none of the royal mummies are negroid.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7
East africans are heavily admixed with whites now?
Well then the Bushmen tribe of Africa must also be mixed with Asians seeing that when they are young, they have slanted eyes like a chinese person. Fact is that even if you're HALF chinese with black skin, you won't have these slanted eyes. If you're half white but dark skinned, you won't have a long narrow nose. There's no proof that an African with a long nose has white ancestry.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
If you're half of anything, you will receive half of each parents genetic information. Mixes are in-betweens and do not fully receive from just one parent, but both.
watch?v=A7DfLZAMAkE
And yes, negroids with long narrow noses is a northern trait; they have Caucasian DNA, genitic studies CONFIRM it & you just admitted negroes have broad flat noses, but now you want to claim all types, hypocrite.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7
There are no Ethiopians with light skin. If they were mixed with Arabs or whatever, they would have lighter skin like Somalians. But no. Just thin lips and narrow noses.
CipherQ 1 year ago
And I'm curious to know; since Asian people have nothing BUT long hair, does that also mean that whites interbred with every Asian? If you think so, then where did they get slanted eyes from? Only ppl that I know of besides Asians who has those type of eyes are children from the Bushmen tribe of Africa. No, wait, its been scientifically proven that slanted eyes are an Asian trait and that Asians gave the bushmen ppl slanted eyes after going to Africa.
Your science is terribly flawed.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@phoenician7 : Wrong, face the truth. The anglo saxons are really Ancient African Albinos. No matter how much they try to cover it up with their incestuous inbreeding and plastic surgery, they'll always be African Albino Saxons. Why do you think the incestuous royals of england call themselves "The Black Nobility". Their dumbass m asses can't even figure it out. Get a grip. Caucasian DNA. The biggest lie ever sold to mankind. The gig is up.
TRUTHEXPANDING 1 year ago
@TRUTHEXPANDING Get a life you fucking nigger. 1st you claim Saxons are "albinos" then you claim they're "blacks" thus refuting your own pathetic "argument". Saxons are not "albinos" you racist fuck. This is just another desperate attempt of you degenerate have-nothings to claim civilizations that you had no part in.
TRASH.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7 : Touched a subconscious tough truth. Tee Hee Hee, you jackass, Albino's are all of African descent. Learn some, then clean out your filthy mouth and soul.
TRUTHEXPANDING 1 year ago
@phoenician7 there is no such thing as caucasian DNA
richbullva 1 year ago 2
"Nothing in the whole of Africa that resembles ancient Egypt"?
There is a reason why the land of Punt is thought to of been in Sudan. We've physical evidence of that. There's nothing in the whole of Asia which resembles ancient Egypt.
And no matter how much you twist it, there's no refuting these quotes. Scholars couldn't so they worked their way around it, or "tap-dance" as you say, but these quotes have definetly been found with the works of Aristotle.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
You obviously havent read the descriptions of Punt as written by Hatshepsut. Physical "evidence" is LACKING for a Punt in Sudan. Punt is always described as being *eastward* of Egypt, not south. Hatshepsut herself identifies Punt as Lebanon.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7
No, physical evidence of Punt located in Asia is lacking.
Every animal, plant and everything else depicted in Egyptian Hieroglyphics are indigenous to Africa for the most part. Not Asia. Theres no evidence of Egypt in Asia while there are ruins of Pyramids further south.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
LOL Egypts older neighbor Mesopotamia had lots of pyramids known as ziggurats. These are also the oldest type of pyramids erected in Egypt before the Great Pyramids or bent pyramids. Cedar; not renowned for growing in Ethiopia. Genetics show no migration from Somalia to Egypt. Three of the worlds leading Egyptologists have debunked Somalia as Punt.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7
So you claim that the Early Egyptians were Mesopatamians? Highly doubtful considering the fact that much of Egypt's religious beliefs, philosophy, traditions, kingship, architecture, musical instruments and art were undeniably African. ppl wouldn't of Migrated out of Asia, into Africa, learned of the ppl's culture and beliefs and decide to of built a civilization based off of it. Its proven that the Egyptians were native to Africa.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@phoenician7
Egyptians would've most likely of been black ppl. Today's Egyptians wear more clothing to protect themselves from the harmful rays of the Sun. Ancient Egyptians wore a lot less clothing and their skin was oftenly naked. They needed a lot of melanin to keep themselves cool. Which is further proof that the first humans were black. They had to of been physically adapted to their climate. Africa gets the most amount of UV radiation than other continent.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
No, Sub Saharans are "black" N.A received the same UV as its next door neighbors in the ME and surrounding Mediterranean. Egyptians also erected houses and temples for shade, they werent negroes. There is NO "proof" that the first humans were "black".
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7
Done yet?
Not only does Egypt get the same amount of UV as the ME, but living near the Nile would've made things extremely humid. Now is there any source of shade near the Sphinx or any pyramids? And the Nubians also built many temples and erected houses. They were black, though it was claimed before that the Nubs were also white.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ If you see the drawings of ancient nubians inside the pyramids of north sudan, you will see that they resemble those drawings found in egypt. Nubians of Sudan have the same skin colours of those drawings found in present egypt and sudan. Ancient egyptians were NOT different from nubians. They are look-a-like.
bergen422 1 year ago
They also look like ethiopeans and eretrians. Since civilizations follow the stream of rivers, we can be sure that ethiopeans, nubians (north of sudan and south of egypt) and ancient egyptians are closely linked together genetically and ethnically.
bergen422 1 year ago
@bergen422
I 100 percently agree.
And yet, there are those who claim that once upon a time ago, the Nile River ran from North to South, instead of South to North as it does in reality. Be that as it may, Egypt's culture is still undeniably African. Not Asian, or Mesopotamian, or what the hell ever. So many simple facts are being ignored with dealing with Egypt's history, that alone is proof that we're being lied to.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@phoenician7
"The Ethiopians, as history relates, were the first of all menThey also say that the Egyptians are colonists sent out by the Ethiopians, Osiris having been the leader of the colonyAnd the larger part of the customs of the Egyptians are, they hold, Ethiopian, the colonists still preserving their ancient manners."
CipherQ 1 year ago
@phoenician7
"For instance, the belief that their kings are gods, the very special attention which they pay to their burial, and many other matters of a similar nature are Ethiopian practices, while the shapes of their statues and the forms of their letters are Ethiopian." Diodorus also observed their statues (probably including the sphinx) and related it to the Ethiopians (Most likely referring to the Nubians) not Arabs.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
"It is likely that the integument of the earliest protohominids was similar to that of our closest living relative, the chimpanzee, being white or lightly pigmented and covered with dark hair" (Post et al.,).
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7 the allele for hiar color in the chimp and early humans became the same one for skin color
richbullva 1 year ago
@phoenician7 so Punt was lLebanon ha ha so i guess thats why there queen was pictured with the big butt,steatopygic butt of africans wow punt was in Lebanon
richbullva 1 year ago
Also, prove your claim. Where are the skeletal remains of caucasoids in the Horn of Africa. Blacks, being the first of all men, would naturally carry just about every trait, dude.
And there were scholars who compared Egypt with Ethiopia. Such as Lucian who seemed to also of had the impression that the Ethiopians founded Egypt. And Herodotus also stated there were 18 Ethiopian dynastic kings of Egypt while scholars tell us of only one.
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
Where is your evidence that negroids are "first" or that they have *every* trait? This is laughable to the educated. There is no evidence for reconstructing what the then contemporary African negro was like skeletally. One can only extrapolate from modern negroes who may not at all be like their ancestory since racial groups are not static, but evolve.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7
And blacks weren't the first to of evoled in Africa? Are you serious?
There's absolutely nothing recessive about black ppl. The skin color, eye color, broad noses, and thick lips alone are all dominate.
You come up with all these scientific studies which all contradict with the laws of nature. Where do you find animals indigenous to a biome which aren't even adapted to living there in the first place?
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
There is nothing "recessive" about any pure race, nimwit. And when two races mix you have a combination, not one that is dominate. Go look at a mulatto. Now here you are talking about broad noses, thick lips.... the mummies DO NOT have those, nor do your mixed race East Africans.
phoenician7 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@phoenician7 homo sapiens has not evolved since he arrived on the scene so so-called racial groups do not and have not evolved at all
richbullva 1 year ago
@CipherQ
Further, your oldest true type nego is Asselar man being only 6500yo. the result of intense polygamy.
Lucian and Herodotus didnt live in predynastic Egypt, did they? Your "argumenets" have no foundation.
phoenician7 1 year ago
@phoenician7
"Lucian and Herodotus didn't live in predynastic Egypt,"
Neither than Arrian and Strabo, but knowing this, why did you choose to challenge me with their quotes in the first place?
CipherQ 1 year ago
@CipherQ
*You* brought up the argument, I refuted it. No Greeks lived in predynastic Egypt.
phoenician7 1 year ago