You're quite good. Question, though, why such a fast tempo? I've always heard this much slower and almost meditative. What's the actual score say about tempo?
Is a Gavotte a fast dance? I know a giga is since in lute works of that period, I always note that they are played allegrissimo or presto. There are slow dances for baroque music too, not just fast ones. I believe alemands and sarabandes are among these. Where do Gavottes fall?
Actualy by 'lute' Bach meant the Lautenwerk a type of clavier strung with lute like strings, so it is certainly not a lute piece as such. So many people seem to wrongly think it was for the lute. Perhaps only the bwv995 suite was intended for the lute itself.
The 'Lute Suites' (actually marked "Aufs Lautenwerk") were BWV 996, BWV 997 and BWV 998. There was also a contemporary transcription,definitely for lute of BWV 1001, the fugue for violin, but that was by 'Weyrauch', not Bach. While there was also a contemporary transcription of BWV 1006 (for violin) which some think to be intended for lute, it was not actually marked as such. The attribution of the solo violin suites as 'lute suites' is thus a modern speculation, a myth.
Hi guitaresida!!! Great version, excellent playing! I have a request for you...since I know you're a music teacher I'd like to learn how to play this song the way you do it because the way I play it is out of a crappy tablature off the internet and it doesn't sound half as good as your version (besides I'm not as good as you, lol). So my request would be: can you put the camera really close to your guitar so we can have a closeup of your playing? Please? : )
Tu es trop gentil !! merci du compliment, mais je suis juste passionné et j'aime partager et communiquer mon plaisir car tous vos commentaires m'aident à avancer.
Belle Gavotte Connaissez-vous la mienne ?
Michel Démarez
demarezmichel 11 months ago
That was absolutely beautiful! The discipline and dedication shows in your magnificant playing style and technique. Excellent! :)
Ron.
( ;-} >
moonpagan 1 year ago
Bravissimo!!!
Mi piace molto la Partita nº 3!
dricaaudi 2 years ago
un tantinet trop rapide a mon goût, mais bravo vous avez tout mon respect
poupoule22 2 years ago
Excelent, vous savez vraiment comment jouer ce sorte de pièce. Great job dude.
Bravo!!!!
krometor 2 years ago
merci pour le compliment
amitiés
pat
guitaresida 2 years ago
Ornamentation mor intricate than anything I ever heard from Christopher Parkening, and so fluid! Bravo!
badflamenco 2 years ago
thanks a lot
best regard
Pat
guitaresida 2 years ago
Very good, I haven't seen something this good in a long time. Superb Job.
crn40 2 years ago
thank you very much
best
Patrick
guitaresida 2 years ago
The best performance in the net. Congratulation.
Cheers/Tarik
Ataral 2 years ago
Hi , Tarik !
thank you very much
Best
guitaresida 2 years ago
une interprétation magnifique!!
biigzen 3 years ago
Very well!!!Bravo!
I like the background... nice idea!
galliard1981 3 years ago
You're quite good. Question, though, why such a fast tempo? I've always heard this much slower and almost meditative. What's the actual score say about tempo?
philomelodia 3 years ago
I admit that it is a bit fast. I wanted to remember that it was a dance too
guitaresida 3 years ago
Is a Gavotte a fast dance? I know a giga is since in lute works of that period, I always note that they are played allegrissimo or presto. There are slow dances for baroque music too, not just fast ones. I believe alemands and sarabandes are among these. Where do Gavottes fall?
philomelodia 3 years ago
I like what you did with this piece. The dynamic range is a little narrow, but no more than a typical John Williams performance, for example.
What is missing in the dynamics is more than made up for in changes in timbre and tempo. I found this very expressive and interesting. Bravo!
3Giogiogio 4 years ago
you cant include bach in the seventeenth century
bach has a different style..
bach wrote this suite and this piece for lute and its played very soft, you need to listen this piece in lute
spainguitar901 4 years ago
Actualy by 'lute' Bach meant the Lautenwerk a type of clavier strung with lute like strings, so it is certainly not a lute piece as such. So many people seem to wrongly think it was for the lute. Perhaps only the bwv995 suite was intended for the lute itself.
Nac3rd 4 years ago
thank's for all these informations
guitaresida 4 years ago
i think it's for violin buddy
ErikStephenGilgen 4 years ago
It is from the Violin Partita No. 3 in E, BWV 1006
Fippletest 4 years ago
and also for the 4th lute suite
crudosoy1 3 years ago
The 'Lute Suites' (actually marked "Aufs Lautenwerk") were BWV 996, BWV 997 and BWV 998. There was also a contemporary transcription,definitely for lute of BWV 1001, the fugue for violin, but that was by 'Weyrauch', not Bach. While there was also a contemporary transcription of BWV 1006 (for violin) which some think to be intended for lute, it was not actually marked as such. The attribution of the solo violin suites as 'lute suites' is thus a modern speculation, a myth.
Fippletest 3 years ago
Thanks for the info dude!!
Stay well
crudosoy1 3 years ago
Wonderfully sprite. Love it!!!!xxx
Leonmitch 4 years ago
you played very fast and you didn't understand the piece. you must play with Dynamics (piano,forte,crescendo and diminuendo)
because without Dynamics it's very boring...
but yuo are very talented
shai901 4 years ago
SLOW down champ..it didnt sound at all like bach...
aleque1111 4 years ago
bravo ! C'est vraiment magnifique. Avez-vous écouté la version de Filomena Moretti?
bonne continuation et merci encore.
missacacia58 4 years ago
Merci
Je suis complètement convaincu même si je vais juste un peu moins vite que toi. MERCI!
Que du Bonheur!
Charlesbex 4 years ago
WHY, WHY,WHY, bother to learn that lovely piece-but not learn the proper speed CANT YOU HEAR THAT WAS WAY TOO FAST!-WHATS THE MATTER WITH YOU!?.
peteryyz43 4 years ago
Hi guitaresida!!! Great version, excellent playing! I have a request for you...since I know you're a music teacher I'd like to learn how to play this song the way you do it because the way I play it is out of a crappy tablature off the internet and it doesn't sound half as good as your version (besides I'm not as good as you, lol). So my request would be: can you put the camera really close to your guitar so we can have a closeup of your playing? Please? : )
Thanks!
mgalbu 4 years ago
OK thanks a lot ! I'll try to satisfy what you asked me to do for a next post of "gavotte en rondeau" as soon as I"ll have any time. Warm salutation
guitaresida 4 years ago
tres bon
SebastheG 4 years ago
je la reécoute tu es vraiment très fort !
anmeyna 4 years ago
Tu es trop gentil !! merci du compliment, mais je suis juste passionné et j'aime partager et communiquer mon plaisir car tous vos commentaires m'aident à avancer.
guitaresida 4 years ago
Alors merci de partager ca avec nous :)
anmeyna 4 years ago
excellent, i am learning this piece for my grade 8 exam. Its good to hear how the piece should sound, thanks!
123456789dave123 4 years ago
very very nice
crudosoy1 4 years ago
i want the sheet can you bring me ? XD
pochol123 4 years ago
the"gavotte en rondeau" is a Rafael Andia's transcription (Transatlantique)
guitaresida 4 years ago
^^ thxs for the tip
pochol123 4 years ago
pardon !!!! Amazing !!!! Good job !
anmeyna 4 years ago
Very nice! I wish I could play classical guitar!
UrosR 4 years ago
I'm occasionaly a professional player. Above all a teacher
guitaresida 4 years ago
Thats a hard one to play. You did it very good!
Are you a professional player?
HermannCordes5 4 years ago
Great! you are excellent!
ovidiov 4 years ago